Military Review

A short comment about the National Guard

104
Contrary to popular misconception, Putin is not a dictator, not an autocrat, and not even the leader of "patriotic siloviki". Putin is a fair arbiter, and his leadership and power is built on the ability to build a fair consensus among all segments of the Russian political and economic elite competing and hating each other. There are many of these segments and there are certainly no good ones among them. And will not.


If it seems to someone that, for example, it is necessary to “give all power to the patriotic security officials,” then this someone is a very naive person. A country that functions as a Russian army from the period before Serdyukov may, of course, terrify others and accomplish great things, but living in it will be rather uncomfortable. In general, the main problem of our managerial elite is that all its segments (no matter how they compete with each other) perceive the people ("population") as a resource. One Putin is a humanist and is not ready to pay with human lives and destinies for progress and breakthroughs. And the elites no longer have the right to treat people as a resource. There are too few of us left, about which Putin speaks at every opportunity.

Patriotic liberals (under this umbrella term, I sign all those who believe that Crimea is ours, but they don’t carry a shoulder strap) would gladly turn Russia into an analogue of the Vietnamese 90's factory. For them, the people are a resource that can and should be exchanged for the growth of GDP, KPI, and the production of conditional "Russian iPads", even if the workers themselves cannot buy them. It would have been fierce GDP growth, but the project "Russia as a Foxconn Factory" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LF6ivkWQqCc) is not the best Russia.

Patriotic security officials (by the way, many for some reason forget that we have the most evil Westernist groups or commercial structures densely populated by immigrants from the KGB and other "organs", so that not every security official is a patriot) would have turned Russia into an analogue of the barracks with pleasure. Soviet barracks. It would be almost the same as in the liberal version, only there will be “tanchiki” instead of gadgets. And of course, "dig from fence to sunset." People are a resource.

Putin (this is a real miracle) treats people as a value. Nobody appreciates him for that, and few people understand this Putin’s feature at all, and especially gifted turbo-patriots even fire him for not introducing a "mobilization economy", apparently counting on the fact that they themselves for the machine seven days on 20 hours will not stand.

Putin, despite the stories about the "dominance of St. Petersburg" and other nonsense, was still in a not very pleasant position, with the constant need to balance between different elite groups. Very slowly and very carefully, elements of an economic and power nature were created that would work specifically on Putin’s team. We will talk about the economic segment separately, but few people believed in the creation (and so fast!) Of the power Putin structure to the end. Here she appeared. This is wonderful, as it strongly unties the hands of the president. This is great newswhich dramatically increases the chances that the future of our country will be made not in the style of "barracks" and not in the style of "Vietnamese sweatshops", but will be comfortable, efficient and polite. From what I congratulate you.
Author:
Originator:
http://crimsonalter.livejournal.com/89788.html
104 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. bubalik
    bubalik April 12 2016 21: 39
    +1
    ,,, but maybe for the better ,,, if only He is a good man and cares for the country ,,, request recourse
    1. ibirus
      ibirus April 12 2016 21: 46
      +38
      Let's just say that he is the right person in his place.
      1. vodolaz
        vodolaz April 12 2016 21: 57
        +21
        Quote: ibirus
        Let's just say that he is the right person in his place.

        I fully support. I once wrote here myself in the comments: You can love Putin, but you can not love, but the person is in his place. But I can say one thing for fans of criticism: what would you do in its place?
        1. iConst
          iConst April 12 2016 22: 28
          +33
          Quote: vodolaz
          I fully support.

          - Yeah, I just want to ask - Watson, what was that?

          A brilliant ode in the style of a TV trollo show. The author, without swinging, throws the thesis: "Contrary to the widespread misconception, Putin is not a dictator ... blah blah blah."

          Where is this "delusion" common? Among my friends this there are no stray sheep and especially sheep.
          Many of them do not really favor the president although they have claims to the president, there are definitely no such primitive "raids".

          If I am not against a number of theses of the author, but I just want to ask about the presentation style, so what was it, Watson?
          1. Cat man null
            April 12 2016 23: 16
            -6
            Quote: iConst
            Where is this "delusion" common?

            - in the world

            Quote: iConst
            so what was it

            - sea, son (s) joke
            1. mihasik
              mihasik April 12 2016 23: 29
              +12
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Where is this "delusion" common?
              - in the world

              If the world is constantly told that: "Peace, you are threshing floor"! Will they believe too? Although ... Now it seems that a worldwide epidemic of cretinism has come.
            2. iConst
              iConst April 13 2016 01: 42
              +3
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Quote: iConst
              Where is this "delusion" common?

              - in the world

              - Or maybe - in the Universe? Are you the official interpreter of the Crimson Alter?

              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Quote: iConst
              so what was it

              - sea, son (s) joke

              “What was that, trololo?” ... Trololo ...

              smile
              1. Cat man null
                April 13 2016 01: 59
                .
                Quote: iConst
                “Or maybe in the universe?”

                - challenge in fact or don’t curtail yourself .. negative

                Quote: iConst
                - Yeah, I just want to ask - Watson, what was that?
                Quote: iConst
                trololo? ... trololo

                - they answered themselves ..

                Nothing personal. What is the question - that is the answer. Something like this yes
          2. ty60
            ty60 April 13 2016 00: 05
            +10
            And the second side of the coin is drug control and the FMS in the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the structure. Try to guess who will be reduced first of all, given that the heads of departments have left. Prompt? The most corrupt structure will survive. As a result? Yes, now the communications engineers go to the teaching staff once a week, g ..number of managers more than people ON THE EARTH working. Technicians instead of the rank and file! I'm not funny
          3. Blondy
            Blondy April 13 2016 00: 41
            +8
            Yes, here the main problem is different: the non-dictator Putin will be replaced, but the National Guard will remain, and another "good man" will come to replace him, but who is not "considered a value" to people.
            1. Ros 56
              Ros 56 April 13 2016 09: 38
              +1
              Quote: Blondy
              but buyout for people is not "as a value."


              We did not have the National Guard under the time of Khrushchev, and he organized two executions, in Georgia, if I am not mistaken in 56, well-known to everyone is Novocherkassk. So it’s not a matter of the guard, it would be a desire, and who shoots will not matter. hi
          4. bovig
            bovig April 13 2016 04: 30
            +10
            . If I am not against a number of theses of the author, but I just want to ask about the presentation style, so what was it, Watson?

            The author showed his "genius" - firstly, he knows everything about everyone and can easily evaluate everyone (who is worth a lot and what is worth), and secondly, he licked so technically ...)))))) And without him ( the author of the article), we would hardly know that Putin made a strong move, anticipating possible urges from the revolutionary-minded persons of the fifth column to take advantage of the potential of the internal troops ... Well, narcissism is not extremism, after all, so everything is fine!)) )
          5. derik1970
            derik1970 April 13 2016 06: 26
            +9
            And yet, if the president is so good, then why is everything in the country so bad ?! We are created the image of a man who is very positive in itself, but his environment does not allow him to do anything ... And this absurdity is being imposed on us by all means. In the discussions here on the site and in classmates, I noticed literally the same texts from my opponents three times in the same spirit. They say the president is good, but they interfere with his work, therefore, for example, he needs the National Guard, the Russian Guard, etc. ... hi
            1. ARES623
              ARES623 April 13 2016 09: 21
              -3
              Quote: derik1970
              And yet, if the president is so good, then why is everything in the country so bad ?!

              How bad is it? How is it in Ukraine? How is it in Latvia? Or why, under such a president, we are not ready to work for the good of our state? The question of the National Guard, in my opinion, is quite simple. NG is needed in order not to involve the Ministry of Defense in conflicts of the Chechen type. By bringing SOBR, OMON, etc., under a single command, we will get a powerful mobile unit capable of solving tasks on a larger scale than a bunch of combined units. The return of the Federal Drug Control Service and the Federal Migration Service to the Ministry of Internal Affairs is a return to the old system that existed until the end of the 90s. In theory, this makes it possible to strengthen the work "on the ground", in practice it will be traditional - some subjects will strengthen the "ground", others "hat". Any good deed can be perverted and brought to the point of absurdity. I don’t think that in terms of developing the structure of law enforcement and countering terrorism, our country is so bad. However, I also disagree with the fact that "Putin (this is a real miracle) treats people as a value." These are all "snot". At the level of the scale of a state like Russia, one cannot think in such categories. Rather, people as a value are a phrase without content. There are the interests of the citizens of the state, the interests of the state as a geopolitical unit, there are actions aimed at maintaining the image - these are all events with specific content. Managing a large structure, the state is often a cynical matter, many useful things cannot be voiced, because how to evaluate this will be possible only if you have the full information background.
        2. mihasik
          mihasik April 12 2016 23: 34
          +15
          Quote: vodolaz
          But I can say one thing for fans of criticism: what would you do in its place?

          Communism, his mother!
          Where did they strive for 70 years and what did they dream about? To each according to his ability, to each according to his work. Who works, he eats!
          1. The right of public ownership of state and municipal means of production:
          the right to common property (in legal terminology - property) of all citizens of a communist country to all state and municipal (respectively, central, regional and local) property - with the obligatory issuance to each citizen of his respective registered certificates of ownership of each such property.

          2. And the principle of genuine democracy (PPD) - as the only possible basis for the mechanism for the implementation of the above rights;
          as the only possible basis for the organization of genuine democracy (democracy) - a truly popular and highly professional state apparatus of power and management.
          ps True, all this excludes oleghorhat and the right of one to own the resources of the whole country. Well, this is such a trifle, isn’t it?) That’s why the coup took place in the 91st ...?
          1. Cat man null
            April 12 2016 23: 55
            -1
            Quote: mihasik
            Communism, his mother! ... To each according to his ability, to each according to his work

            So stop

            Communism: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.
            Socialism: from each according to his ability, to each according to his work.

            Quote: mihasik
            1. The right of public ownership of state and municipal means of production ... - with the obligatory issuance to each citizen of his respective registered certificates of ownership of each such property.

            2. And the principle of genuine democracy (PPD) - as the only possible basis for the mechanism for the implementation of the above rights;
            as the only possible basis for the organization of genuine democracy (democracy) - a truly popular and highly professional state apparatus of power and management

            - agree, neither (1) nor (2) - was not even under the Union

            Voooot request
            1. mihasik
              mihasik April 13 2016 00: 00
              +10
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - agree, neither (1) nor (2) - was not even under the Union

              Voooot

              And who is arguing? They strove for this. And the movement, as you know, is life! Or not? Again, I repeat: As the only possible basis for the organization of genuine democracy (democracy) - genuinely popular and highly professional state apparatus of power and administration... and with this and in the USSR there were problems, you know the party nomenclature). But the ideas are "bright" agree.
              1. Cat man null
                April 13 2016 00: 13
                -1
                Quote: mihasik
                As the only possible basis for the organization of genuine democracy (democracy) - a truly popular and highly professional state apparatus of power and management. and there were problems with this in the USSR, you know the party nomenclature)

                - we know .. firsthand, I managed to feel yes
                - apparently, this was one of the reasons why the shirnarmasses allowed the existing system to collapse. It seemed-take away the dictates of the party, and everything will be .. hurt yourself
                - only miscalculated slightly. Those same party members, mixed with farthing bandits and others, now billionaires (I studied counting with one of the seven bankers), and the mass, as usual - figs

                Quote: mihasik
                They strove for this

                - crookedly, IMHO, aspired. At least in the 80s - it was already .. "at the end", it was clear that something was wrong

                Quote: mihasik
                movement, as you know, is life!

                Quote: E. Bernstein
                Movement is everything, purpose is nothing

                Kidding sad
                1. mihasik
                  mihasik April 13 2016 00: 35
                  +6
                  - we know .. firsthand, I managed to feel yes
                  - apparently, this was one of the reasons why the shirnarmasses allowed the existing system to collapse. It seemed-take away the dictates of the party, and everything will be .. hurt yourself
                  - only miscalculated slightly. Those same party members, mixed with farthing bandits and others, now billionaires (I studied counting with one of the seven bankers), and the mass, as usual - figs

                  So this is the personal factor of the party nomenklotura of those times, or simply grabber. Are they now in the "bright democratic present" less?) By the way, in the collapse of the country did not they participate with the security forces? Where is the party's gold?) Oops, has it evaporated?) And how could such "affairs" be done without special services and the state apparatus?)
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. Baloo
        Baloo April 12 2016 23: 26
        -4
        Let's just say that he is the right person in his place.

        and professionally trained for the position of head of state, whose competence is confirmed by a specialized dissertation. If I’m not mistaken: the state and prospects of the economy of the development of the resource-producing state (or something like that), so that everything is going according to plan, in accordance with verified calculations and forecasts.
        Whoever whined, but the country rose from its knees in spite of the active opposition of Western "partners" and modern challenges in the economy, politics, frenzied counter-propaganda against Russia and Putin himself. I voted for him twice and will support it again if necessary. Performance is striking.
        Sanctions also hit my pocket, but we won’t jump, we are Russians.
        1. Baloo
          Baloo April 13 2016 14: 30
          -2
          It affects performance.

          Especially for those who reacted negatively to my koment. I am a free man, who did not give subscriptions and did not wear a shoulder strap, I respect GDP for competence, hard work, firmness and flexibility, rationality and responsibility. Whether someone likes it or not, the GDP of those people who want to imitate, who want to focus on, who have something to learn from life. Something like this. think for a moment: would you do it, would you be able to work at that pace?
          For starters, try to learn how to play the piano with just one finger, learn a foreign language, master a hang glider, learn how to play hockey, if you've never done this before before 50. And if only force yourself to get up early and do gymnastics for 40 minutes, if you have never done it before. This will be your personal achievement, it will be something to be proud of, although it is more difficult than pushing the clave.
      3. Drmadfisher
        Drmadfisher April 13 2016 01: 49
        +7
        maybe so, but at my 53 years I can’t get a job, before 49 we take everything, somewhere someone said about the abolition of the age limit, huh?
        1. Baloo
          Baloo April 13 2016 13: 41
          +1
          I can’t get a job at 53 years old

          At 53, it’s difficult to learn a new craft, but sometimes it’s worth it. hi
          Unfortunately, at 59, I'm afraid to take risks for a number of reasons. But if there was an opportunity, he would be retrained as a tailor. Beautifully dressing people from the smallest to the oldest, this is also a worthy occupation and art, as well as what I do more than half my life. hi
          In any case, you should be registered at the labor exchange. Theoretically, they can offer you to retrain for other professions for free and help with employment. And most importantly, in case of problems with health, you will have a sick leave.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt April 12 2016 22: 03
      +8
      It is, as it were, crawling along some abstract branch and licking from it, which God sends, of course, is better for not straining the "brain muscle". But without even having a general idea of ​​the state structure, such articles are written at the level of a comprehensive school on the topic "with whom will you spend time at night after graduation." laughing Author on the wall "meeting with the madmen"! laughing
      Comment on the obvious nonsense, do not respect yourself. hi
      1. vsoltan
        vsoltan April 12 2016 22: 08
        -3
        sibirbalt

        Oleg, since January 2014 you have not written a single article. ..This publication, of course, is not perfect, but the author showed his civic position. ..and you? Only in the comments? Or are there any constructive suggestions?
        1. dauria
          dauria April 13 2016 02: 28
          +9
          Oleg, since January 2014 you have not written a single article


          Oops, I really didn’t think it was punishable by law.
          Is it necessary to compose an article for a constructive proposal? In the theory of relativity of everything two postulate in two offers request

          Well, according to the article. The author decided that Putin is a man of love. My opinion is I I DO NOT KNOW who is Putin. He did not grow up with him, did not serve, did not work. I did not meet people who knew him personally.
          Basta. Believe the media without me.
      2. Cat man null
        April 13 2016 00: 00
        .
        Sibiralt, hi

        Quote: siberalt
        Author on the wall "meeting with the madmen"!

        - "author" is a very good analyst, it's just not an article, but, so to speak, a sketch for an article
        - you can - write better, I read with pleasure yes

        Quote: siberalt
        Comment on the obvious nonsense ...

        - did not see "obvious nonsense" ..

        Quote: siberalt
        ... not respect yourself

        Almost a joke: the inscription in the restroom in one office, where I was somehow .. in a snap:

        "Men! Use a brush, respect yourself" .. Doesn't it look like anything? wink
        1. Basarev
          Basarev April 13 2016 06: 41
          +5
          Quote: Crimson Alter
          Putin (this is a real miracle) treats people as a value.

          Oh, come on! Forgot, probably, who appoints these cannibals and approves their hateful laws?
      3. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn April 13 2016 09: 09
        +4
        The author, even Kamenev, has surpassed, in terms of style of approval - from reading such articles anecdote is immediately recalled
        The king complains to the doctor of constipation. He looks from behind and says:
        -So you have there, king-father, and there is no anus ...
        Tsar: -Licked again, you bastards !!!
  2. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 12 2016 21: 43
    +3
    Russia is a multinational country.
    What nationality are we talking about in the name of the new structure - the national guard?
    Maybe the name of the Russian Guard would be better?
    1. nazar_0753
      nazar_0753 April 12 2016 21: 49
      +5
      Generally speaking, you are slightly behind the news. The National Guard of the Russian Federation will be officially abbreviated as Rosguard; look for news
    2. bubalik
      bubalik April 12 2016 21: 49
      -1
      Pvi1206 RU  Today, 21: 43 What nationality are we talking about in the name of the new structure - the national guard?
      Maybe the name of the Russian Guard would be better?

      ,,, and where did you see the words in the article about
      National Guard
      ? (except for the header) ,,
      1. opus
        opus April 12 2016 22: 15
        +6
        Quote: bubalik
        ? (except for the header) ,,

        Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 158 of April 5, 2016 "On the Director of the Federal Service for Troops national Guard of the Russian Federation - Commander-in-Chief of the Troops national Guard of the Russian Federation. ”




        Quote: nazar_0753
        The National Guard of the Russian Federation will be officially abbreviated as Rosguard; look for news

        What the hell is it in the "news". Clowns are looking for the news

        Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of April 5, 2016 “Issues of the Federal Service of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation”.
        Not a word .. neither the President nor his office says that the NG of the Russian Federation
        Quote: nazar_0753
        officially abbreviated will be called Rosguard





        razi that nazar_0753 in a dream dreamed
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. bubalik
          bubalik April 12 2016 22: 31
          -2
          opus (7) RU  Today, 22: 15 ↑
          ,,, at the moment we are not discussing a presidential decree, but an article ,,, winked
          1. opus
            opus April 12 2016 22: 43
            +5
            Quote: bubalik
            ,,, at the moment we are not discussing a presidential decree, but an article,

            This article is about what?
        3. nazar_0753
          nazar_0753 April 12 2016 22: 40
          +1
          Dear opus, just go to the federal portal of draft regulatory legal acts (official site) and open the project "On the Federal Service of the National Guard of the Russian Federation." For those who cannot adequately use the search, I give a link: http://regulation.gov.ru/projects#npa=47818. We press "Project text" and enjoy reading. Next time, be more careful in evaluating the statements of other users, and first think and check, and then comment hi
          1. opus
            opus April 12 2016 22: 49
            +4
            Quote: nazar_0753
            Dear opus, just go to the federal portal


            Dear Nazar_0753 ....
            I do not need ANYWHERE "to go" and nothing to "enjoy", especially on
            FEDERAL PORTAL PROJECTS REGULATORY LEGAL ACTS

            fool


            You can not read? or pretend to be?
            I brought the OFFICIAL ORDERS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION VV PUTIN.
            And he gave a link, not to some "project portal, but to

            http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/iZMYtGM3AIC8dZEHTkQIogGXzoaqD9OJ.
            pdf


            http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51648

            belay
            ???????????? Why are you "handing" the portal to me?
            On the question of "adequacy" and "search" .... doubts crept into my mind, regarding you.
            Oh well.
            You to me right here
            http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/iZMYtGM3AIC8dZEHTkQIogGXzoaqD9OJ.


            pdf


            Or here, yourself, not in pdf:
            http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51648
            Firsthand so skaaat

            Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 157 (sorry I missed) dated April 5, 2016 “Issues of the Federal Service of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation”.

            Crib
            Quote: nazar_0753
            National Guard of the Russian Federation officially abbreviated as Rosguard,

            How? weak or in
            Quote: nazar_0753
            look for news

            ?
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. opus
                opus April 13 2016 00: 27
                +5
                Quote: AlexDARK
                I see you are a lover of shit **

                diagnosis to you: shitstorm

                Y. Hasek, “The Adventures of the Good Soldier Schweik” about those (like you) correctly noticed


                Quote: AlexDARK
                Well, don’t write at all.

        4. Sharapov
          Sharapov April 12 2016 23: 19
          +11
          Our structure of law enforcement agencies is changing in five minutes. And with a frequency of 5 years. The Organized Crime Control Department was removed by the police, then they attached the tax police, disconnecting the drug police and the FMS. Now they took the SOBR, riot police, returned the drug police and the FMS. Tens of thousands of human destinies reared, and you clung to terminology ... It's ridiculous.
          One stroke of the pen and everything will be as it should. And not necessarily as they say in the press.
          1. opus
            opus April 12 2016 23: 47
            +1
            Quote: Sharapov
            and you cling to the terminology ...

            I didn't "clung" to anything at all, I simply refuted (provingly) the stupidity of empty statements.
            Although I myself am against it.
            Quote: Sharapov
            they removed the Organized Crime Control Department in the police, then they attached the tax police, disconnecting the drug police and the FMS. Now they took the SOBR, riot police, returned the drug police and the FMS.

            All that is stupidity (from a logical point of view), and so in general: the opportunity to get rich (signs, certificates, uniforms, sp, etc. _) + new positions, denyuzhki, sanatoriums, etc. (and not "earth" and then celestials).


            Quote: Sharapov
            One stroke of the pen and everything will be as it should. And not necessarily as they say in the press.

            1. I doubt it.
            2. We still live in the legal.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Kos_kalinki9
      Kos_kalinki9 April 12 2016 21: 54
      0
      Russia is a multinational country.
      What nationality are we talking about in the name of the new structure - the national guard?
      Maybe the name of the Russian Guard would be better?
      Your words are heard
      IN, Events
      The National Guard of the Russian Federation is invited to call Rosgvardia
      Today, 06: 19 Print
      Discussion of the news that a new power structure is appearing in Russia - the National Guard - has been going on for the past few days (since the signing of the corresponding presidential decree). The main questions were raised by the name of the structure in the light of what constitutes, for example, the Ukrainian structure with the same name. Public concerns about this led to the fact that the short name of the National Guard of Russia was proposed to be used in the following form: Rosguard.
      1. opus
        opus April 12 2016 22: 56
        +3
        Quote: Kos_kalinki9
        Your words are heard

        the press is not that.
        Quote: nazar_0753
        look for news

        You find here:

        http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51648
    5. Homo
      Homo April 12 2016 22: 56
      +8
      Quote: Pvi1206
      Russia is a multinational country.
      What nationality are we talking about in the name of the new structure - the national guard?

      Firstly, there are practically no mono-ethnic states. But they have national guards. So what's the problem?
      Secondly, the Nation (from lat. Natio - tribe, people) - the socio-economic, cultural, political and spiritual community of the industrial era [1].
      There are two main approaches to understanding a nation: as a political community of citizens of a certain state and as an ethnic community (a form of existence of one or several ethnoses living together) with a single language and self-awareness.
      In international law, it is a synonym for a nation state. The concept of “nation” should not be confused with the concept of “nationality”.
      Any questions? hi
      1. opus
        opus April 12 2016 23: 59
        +3
        Quote: Homo
        Firstly, there are practically no mono-ethnic states. But they have national guards. So what's the problem?

        Firstly, did you meet the NATIONAL GUARD in the FEDERAL (or Confederate) STATE? (Swiss Guard, do not take too much, it is for the Vatican)

        Well, for example: the national guard of the Federal Republic of Germany, the national guard of the SFRY, the national guard of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the national guard of the Federated States of Micronesia ...
        The USA is falling out ... but there is an American nation

        Firstly (A) ASH STUMP EXIST
        Quote: Homo
        mono-ethnic states
        :

        Japan, North and South Korea, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Bangladesh, Denmark, Brazil, Poland, Iceland, Hungary, many Arab countries (primarily the Arabian Peninsula), etc.
        These are mono-ethnic states, and the concept is antonym to the concept "Multinational state." : "The nation-state is an area where the cultural boundaries match up with the political boundaries.

        Quote: Homo
        Secondly, the Nation (from lat. Natio - tribe, people)

        You then run through the wiki, once you start:
        Tribe can designate a form as ethnicAnd political organization
        I mean, from the "nation" well, not far from ....

        nation: tribe; homogeneous people speaking one common language, all classes
        and la garde nationale?
        and the national guard of Ukraine?
        1. Homo
          Homo April 13 2016 17: 38
          0
          Much has been written, but essentially chatter is demagogy!
          1. opus
            opus April 13 2016 19: 42
            0
            Quote: Homo
            Much has been written

            Count the number of signs of mine and yours. You will be surprised: almost equality
            Quote: Homo
            but essentially chatter

            I'm not HOMO (erectus?), But HOMO SAPIENS.
            that's why I got used to DEFEND my point of view and prove, at least something (preferably not "Vicky")


            Quote: Homo
            - demagogy!

            D.- "leadership of the people; fawning on the people») - a set of oratory and polemic techniques and means allowing mislead the audience and persuade it to their side. Most commonly applied to achieve political goals, in advertising and propaganda.

            You HOMO, a wiki expert needs to know this.
            And now apply your statement / definition of "demagoguery" to me and to YOURSELF (to your statements).

            Conclusion?
      2. Ermak
        Ermak April 13 2016 06: 05
        0
        Quote: Homo
        Quote: Pvi1206
        Russia is a multinational country.
        What nationality are we talking about in the name of the new structure - the national guard?

        Firstly, there are practically no mono-ethnic states. But they have national guards. So what's the problem?
        Secondly, the Nation (from lat. Natio - tribe, people) - the socio-economic, cultural, political and spiritual community of the industrial era [1].
        There are two main approaches to understanding a nation: as a political community of citizens of a certain state and as an ethnic community (a form of existence of one or several ethnoses living together) with a single language and self-awareness.
        In international law, it is a synonym for a nation state. The concept of “nation” should not be confused with the concept of “nationality”.
        Any questions? hi

        All true.
    6. pv1005
      pv1005 April 12 2016 22: 57
      0
      Quote: Pvi1206
      Russia is a multinational country.
      What nationality are we talking about in the name of the new structure - the national guard?
      Maybe the name of the Russian Guard would be better?

      And what nationality will the military be? That nation will be NG, that is, the multinational peoples of Russia.
  3. Nikolay82
    Nikolay82 April 12 2016 21: 49
    +10
    "The tsar is good, the boyars are bad," this is not even funny. Putin is an intelligent man and knows everything perfectly well how his "boyars" rule. He created a system when an ordinary person has no one to choose besides him, from those who flicker in the media.
    1. Flinky
      Flinky April 12 2016 22: 04
      -9
      From Estonia, of course, it is more visible. However, envy you in silence.
      1. Nikolay82
        Nikolay82 April 12 2016 23: 19
        +2
        I look you're advanced, I could only recognize the flag. Probably sitting in the right place, warming your fifth point.
    2. Dym71
      Dym71 April 12 2016 23: 31
      -1
      Quote: Nikolay82
      Created a system when an ordinary person has no one to choose but him


      Nikolay, share for the triumph of democracy in Estonia, please, I really want to know for Estonian overpower and the path to its achievement laughing

      Quote: Nikolay82
      I look you are advanced, I could only recognize the flag

      And I could find out yes And what are you offended by? request
      it’s written in your profile that you are from Estonia.
      1. Nikolay82
        Nikolay82 April 13 2016 00: 14
        +4
        for the Estonian "Nokia", let the citizens of this "state" tell you. Although, there can still be those who consider the Russophobic policy of the Estonian managers to be normal. Which have Russian roots, but look into the mouth of the local "elite".
        For Estonians we are occupiers, for people like "Flinky" we are emigrants.
  4. Tambov Wolf
    Tambov Wolf April 12 2016 21: 50
    +14
    Some article is muddy, and even in the style of obscurity. What the author wanted to say is incomprehensible. Perhaps he came for the pluses?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. bubalik
      bubalik April 12 2016 21: 58
      +1
      Tambov Wolf (2) RU  Today, 21: 50 New What the author wanted to say is incomprehensible. Probably came for the pluses?
      ,,, yes the author why our advantages ,,, can work out a minimum ,,,
      So, according to paragraph 13 "Regulations on the order of awarding scientific degrees" (approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 24 September 2013 N 842), the number of publications that set out the main scientific results of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Science in peer-reviewed publications should be: in the field of art and cultural studies, socio-economic, social and human sciences - at least 15, in other areas - at least 10.

      The number of publications in which the main scientific results of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of sciences are presented, in peer-reviewed publications should be: in the field of art history and cultural studies, socio-economic, social and human sciences - not less than 3, in other areas - not less than 2.
      ,,, bully
    3. Cat man null
      April 12 2016 22: 36
      -6
      Quote: Tambov Wolf
      Probably come for the pros?

      Wolf, welcome hi

      - to this author, I assure you, our advantages are absolutely parallel laughing

      Quote: Tambov Wolf
      What the author wanted to say is unclear

      - the author explains why the Rosguard is being created, no? wink

      Quote: Tambov Wolf
      Some article is muddy, and even in the style of obscurity

      - this is your aberration of vision sad
    4. ty60
      ty60 April 13 2016 00: 10
      +1
      Most likely, but not so simple
  5. vanavatny
    vanavatny April 12 2016 21: 54
    +11
    somehow everything is simplified to the level of political information in the eighth grade
    1. Flinky
      Flinky April 12 2016 22: 05
      -9
      And correctly simplified. Because the stubborn ones need to explain on the fingers why the President does this and not otherwise.
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 April 12 2016 22: 42
        +16
        Well, explain to me, stubbornly, why the president canceled the confiscation of property.
        1. Cat man null
          April 12 2016 23: 11
          -4
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          President abolishes confiscation of property

          - and when did he do it?
          - And is it exactly what he did?

          Just in order to clarify yes
          1. Mordvin 3
            Mordvin 3 April 12 2016 23: 21
            +9
            This was in the 2003 year. Deputies joyfully supported.
            1. Cat man null
              April 12 2016 23: 34
              0
              Quote: mordvin xnumx
              This was in the 2003 year. Deputies joyfully supported.

              - thanks for the tip hi

              Everything is a little funnier there, in fact:

              Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 153 of July 27.07.2006, 15.1 introduced in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Chapter XNUMX Confiscation of property. In this chapter, confiscation refers to the compulsory gratuitous seizure and appeal to state property on the basis of a guilty verdict of property.
              Property subject to confiscation (Article 104.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation):

              Money, valuables and other property obtained in the commission of a grave or especially grave crime;
              Income from property acquired by criminal means;
              If money and other property went to finance terrorism or a criminal organization;
              Means of committing a crime (tools, weapons and devices);
              A part of property acquired by honest means if money acquired by criminal means was invested during the acquisition;


              according to the Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 107 dated July 10.07.2012, 104.2, in Art. 2. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, an amendment was made, namely paragraph XNUMX.

              In clause 2. Art. 104.2. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the legislator provided for the possibility of a court considering criminal cases to consider the confiscation of the property of the accused in compensation for harm suffered as a result of the crime.

              But paragraph 2 of Art. 104.2. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is applied only if the damage caused by the unlawful act of the convicted person cannot be covered from property recognized as obtained by criminal means


              So everything, of course, is somewhat worse than it was before 2003, but still, IMHO, it is not hopeless yes
              1. Mordvin 3
                Mordvin 3 April 12 2016 23: 49
                +6
                Well yes. Not at all hopeless. I was recently taken away, asked: what article? Answer: 224 part B. Home came, and did not get it, what kind of article is this.
                1. Cat man null
                  April 13 2016 00: 24
                  -2
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  I was recently taken away, asked: what article? Answer: 224 part B

                  Article 224. Careless storage of firearms

                  1. Careless storage of firearms, which created the conditions for its use by another person, if this entailed the death of a person or other grave consequences, -

                  2. The same act resulting in the death of two or more persons

                  - part B is not there belay
                  - a loaf, I suppose? wink
                  1. Mordvin 3
                    Mordvin 3 April 13 2016 04: 16
                    +5
                    Quote: Cat Man Null
                    - a loaf, I suppose?

                    Yeah. He walked home, didn’t hurt anyone. And then they drew themselves. They have a plan.
                    1. Throw
                      Throw April 13 2016 05: 06
                      +1
                      If "came home" - then there is no article. And the cops had no plan. Like the detainee wassat
  6. Vadim237
    Vadim237 April 12 2016 21: 54
    -3
    And it’s good that they created the national guard — fewer different kinds of thoughts will be for certain guys to overthrow power by force.
  7. Altona
    Altona April 12 2016 21: 58
    +11
    I did not understand the article, to be honest. The only thing that I accept as a thesis is that Putin is the elected president and in this his power is legitimate. And the second is that Putin is the only sane and adequate politician in the world, and in this his name is already a brand like Stalin. The rest, in general, is propaganda, it is very PR in the world with both minus and plus. For some reason, not a word about the national guard. And our people are a resource for power. She is considered a credit herd.
    1. Cat man null
      April 12 2016 22: 41
      -3
      Quote: Altona
      The rest is propaganda.

      But this too?

      his leadership and power is built on the ability to build a fair consensus between all competing and hating each other segments of the Russian political and economic elite. These segments are many and certainly not good among them. And will not be

      There’s nothing to highlight with color, every word is the main thing yes
  8. Pinkie F.
    Pinkie F. April 12 2016 21: 59
    +10
    Patriotic Liberals

    away we go. Online fraud - now everything is ours. We make combinations of tags. Clever.
    Putin (this is a real miracle) treats people as a value.

    Как the state refers to people (as a matter of fact, GDP is not the essence, and, in fact, it doesn’t matter anyway) - it is necessary to judge by the real state of things, and not by the outlook of network connections. From them from someone (shhhh!) The whole ass is now in zacocax, then in bites. They got it. And liberal democrats (or liberal democrats, if aftop likes to shuffle tags) have suggested a cool way to replenish the budget - hell, cigarettes aren’t covered yet! Excise tax increased for gas, shawl people? And 200 for a pack shavat. The health of the nation is priceless !!!
  9. Barakuda
    Barakuda April 12 2016 22: 00
    +6
    I really didn’t understand, there’s something article

    Kalash taught me to shoot Father more vigorously. A fun little article about nothing.
  10. demo
    demo April 12 2016 22: 02
    +22
    Contrary to popular misconception, Putin is not a dictator, not an autocrat, and not even the leader of "patriotic siloviki". Putin is a fair arbiter, and his leadership and power is built on the ability to build a fair consensus among all segments of the Russian political and economic elite competing and hating each other. There are many of these segments and there are certainly no good ones among them. And will not.

    As our President says: "I am not a groom, I am not a bride. I should not be liked by anyone. I am the President of Russia, where about 150 million people live. And I must take care of them."
    Heard.
    So.
    Despite your efforts to remove him from the blow and responsibility - this is not so easy to do.
    If you took upon yourself these responsibilities, then try so that a large, if possible, part of the population, at least 60%, considers you a worthy leader.
    If there are only enemies around you, and you are still alive, then this may mean that not all enemies are.
    If your judges take illegal actions for money, then you don’t have to disperse the entire judiciary, it’s enough to have loyal people in the College of the Supreme Court who are charged with the duty of removing the bribe takers from their ranks.
    If racket protection, corruption, lawlessness flourishes in the internal affairs bodies, then justice should not be administered independently.
    It is enough to have a normal Minister and the heads of the Central Internal Affairs Directorate and the Internal Affairs Directorate.
    And they will fiercely tear their subordinates.
    And if your Minister of Defense turned out to be either incapable, or worse, self-serving, then you yourself, not afraid to get your hands dirty, tear his head off, so much so that the rest of the ministerial r.v.o.lo.h.ch. sleep, a month or two, after this action could not.

    May be enough?
    After all, the principle - divide and rule, was invented back in the days of the first democracies, and maybe even the pharaohs.
    How to properly manage your subordinates - you can read in our history, which are well reflected in the processes of the time of Stalin.

    I remember one article about the Chairman of the USSR State Planning Commission, Baibakov.
    Stalin summoned and set a task before him, then the Minister of the Oil Industry, to find a source of oil that could replace Baku and Grozny.
    Baibakov began to say that it would take four to five years to find, study, etc.
    Stalin snapped: "In six months, there is oil - there is Baibakov. No oil, there is no Baibakov."
    Everything was completed on time.
    And what, did Stalin put a gun to his temple?
    No.
    Baibakov simply knew for sure what would follow.
    And if you are not able to cope with the task, then there is nothing to take a place.
    You’ll be alive and well.

    Yes. No way our compassionate leader does not want to start tightening the nuts.
    After all, every new official caught in billions of kickbacks and bribes is not an indicator of the work of law enforcement agencies, but an indicator of complete lack of control and irresponsibility, both of the official and those who should keep an eye on him.
    1. Flinky
      Flinky April 12 2016 22: 06
      .
      Critic, what did you do to prevent this from happening?
    2. Barakuda
      Barakuda April 12 2016 22: 10
      +7
      Yeah, I'm FOR. Only fuck I do not need, in the same Ulyanovsk plant, I will continue to rivet blanks on Germany. Antonov would have rolled over in his grave. ALREADY.
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 April 12 2016 22: 49
        +3
        And we have gypsum knauft. Investments, b ..
    3. Warrior Hamilton
      Warrior Hamilton April 13 2016 07: 51
      +1
      Himself that he will tighten the nuts?
      One real devil had a nut instead of a belly button. He twisted it after running constantly and twisted the thread ........ his ass fell off. request
  11. Rader
    Rader April 12 2016 22: 07
    +2
    Heh ... Put the article (unexpectedly) minus. Put this minus by the fact that Putin does not need advertising, and so wink And I did not find other goals for writing this article ... Instead of parsing the decision to create the National / Rosgvradia, we received a laudatory ode to Putin, a man-lover! wassat
    As for the creation of the National Guard, here I agree with the thesis that this decision is more dictated by political expediency than by other factors. We will wait and see if this decision was correct.
    Ps Personally, my opinion is: philanthropists and other pacifists / voluntarists can’t give a seat at the helm of the power! Yes, these people can have exceptionally good intentions (and we all remember: where the paved road leads them), but in case of a crisis situation they will not be able to make a Tough decision, even if it will be the only right one.
  12. akudr48
    akudr48 April 12 2016 22: 16
    +8
    The author wants to be more delicate, more respectful with big bosses, while preserving his dignity and, as it were, independence in judgments, demonstrating the real Shvekov approach of a member of the "party of moderate progress within the framework of legality." It happens.

    But then he could not stand it and from an unbearable love for the rower gave out a true loyal masterpiece:
    Putin (this is a real miracle) treats people as a value.

    Trying to understand what the author has in mind, until the question comes to mind, "how much is the unit of value now?"
  13. Forever so
    Forever so April 12 2016 22: 22
    +4
    for some reason they forgot the corrupt liberals in power today, for them Russia and its peoples inhabiting it are not even a resource, but a means of sale.
    1. populist
      populist April 12 2016 23: 37
      +5
      Forever so

      for some reason they forgot the corrupt liberals in power today

      Yes, they specifically forgot, they are silent.
  14. Bizer
    Bizer April 12 2016 22: 32
    -1
    Article plus. The content is faded, the conclusions are correct. Maybe something like an oprichnina army formed in the state?
  15. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov April 12 2016 22: 39
    +4
    As I understand it, the author writes that Putin is a centrist. and this is good. What I do not accept in this article is exaggeration. Where are these labels "Vietnamese sweatshop", "fierce GDP growth"? These labels give off intellectual hysteria, or, to put it another way, the statements of the bad political officer "don't do as I do, but do as I said." Everyone has become familiar with labeling everyone, for example, I would like to finally read a competent analysis of what would have happened if, for example, we had adopted Glazyev's model with simultaneous strict currency control. I myself can describe without name-calling. but with logical proofs the lack of economic education hinders, but the logic is ready to understand. like all the others, and hang labels all much.
  16. gendir.grifon
    gendir.grifon April 12 2016 22: 42
    +8
    Already painfully loyal little article. More objectivity ...
  17. Was mammoth
    Was mammoth April 12 2016 22: 46
    +7
    According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the President stands above three branches of power. Does not suit the President - he can remove any one according to the same Constitution, even remove the Prime Minister, or even dissolve the Duma. Therefore, the tendency for Putin to directly re-subordinate himself from the security forces to the State Archives raises questions. Say, the same creation of the National Guard - a return to the original meaning of the Guard, the protection of the "crown bearer"? Then from whom? And how does this correspond to the Constitution of the Russian Federation? Yes, and the name was chosen, well, like the police.
    PS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAJryS7N_Tg
    Briefly, but, pay attention, with what flags the "rebels".
  18. Cat man null
    April 12 2016 22: 59
    0
    IMHO the main thing with the article is still this:

    Putin is a fair arbiter, and his leadership and power is built on the ability to build a fair consensus between all competing and hating each other segments of the Russian political and economic elite. These segments are many and certainly not good among them. And will not be

    Once again, by division:

    - the "power elite" is not homogeneous
    - it consists of "competing and hating each other segments"
    - all these segments, from the point of view of mine (and, apparently, yours), are bad, and nevertheless:

    - all these swan-shell-pike must be made to work .. constructively
    - the created Rosguard is one of the tools that will help the President of the Russian Federation in this difficult and thankless task

    It seems to me that most colleagues with HE do not understand (or misunderstand) these simple things.

    It is precisely in order to (maybe) understand at last that I brought here this article of a highly respected analyst. From here: http://crimsonalter.livejournal.com

    PS: there, by the way, there is a lot about what else is, and in much more detail. Perhaps some of the comrades will find there answers to some of their questions (not advertising) laughing
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 April 12 2016 23: 17
      +4
      Quote: Cat Man Null
      It seems to me that most colleagues with HE do not understand (or misunderstand) these simple things.

      Everyone understands everything, kotyara, only while we are silent.
      1. Cat man null
        April 12 2016 23: 38
        +1
        Quote: Mordvin 3
        Everyone understands everything

        - let me disagree with you .. request

        Quote: Mordvin 3
        kotyara

        belay

        Quote: Mordvin 3
        just keep quiet

        - why - silent?
        - bye - what are we waiting for? wink
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 April 12 2016 23: 56
          +2
          Unfortunately, the working class is extinct. You know.
          1. Cat man null
            April 13 2016 00: 30
            -1
            Quote: Mordvin 3
            Unfortunately the working class has died out

            - yes well .. though if in the sense of "class-conscious proletarians"? So they never existed, IMHO yes

            Quote: Mordvin 3
            You know

            - Listen .. I'm here with everyone on you, and so used to it. If there are other suggestions - in PM. Good? wink
  19. von_Tilsit
    von_Tilsit April 12 2016 23: 07
    +6
    You can argue around the National Guard indefinitely, but the fact remains that from now on the President has in his hands a powerful instrument of force, a half-million army with extra-judicial powers, the ability to conduct operations abroad (sounds interesting, right?)) And heavy artillery to boot. And at least zaminusuyte me in the plinth, but I wonder - HOW DOES IT DISPUT IT ???
  20. Papapg
    Papapg April 12 2016 23: 19
    -3
    I am for Putin! But someone needs to be suspended for one or two "places", for example, the same Serdyukov-Taburetkin, otherwise how the water came off a duck's back, but I don't agree with that!
  21. stas
    stas April 12 2016 23: 20
    +8
    The true goal of creating an additional power structure that has become higher in rank than the Ministry of Internal Affairs, we will probably find out by the end of autumn.
    While fortune-telling on coffee grounds.
  22. atamankko
    atamankko April 12 2016 23: 35
    -5
    Article 4 on a five-point system.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. kamski
    kamski April 12 2016 23: 57
    +8
    Only the welfare of the PEOPLE can achieve peace in society, and not a handful of APPROXIMATE. No HUMAN OWNERS people who will begin to starve to get to sit at home will fail.
    1. eleronn
      eleronn April 13 2016 00: 30
      +3
      I agree 100%! When will they tell me about the phenomenal abilities of Prokhorov, Abromovich, Chubais (and similar individuals) that predetermined dizzying financial success? Personal success.
  25. asiat_61
    asiat_61 April 13 2016 00: 24
    +7
    Putin (this is a real miracle) treats people as a value... The tsar is good, the boyars are bad. But only the tsar can disperse the government. However, the tsar is happy with everything, he is pleased with everything, a philanthropist. There is nothing about the article.
    1. kamski
      kamski April 13 2016 02: 33
      +4
      Of course, the KING has arrived from a different planet, he wants to know the TRUTH, but those around him are Hiding the TRUTH !!!
  26. corporal
    corporal April 13 2016 01: 51
    0
    I still cannot understand the role of OVO and FSUE Okhrana. These structures are designed to provide security services on a contractual basis.
    True, there is a list of state objects subject to protection only by these units (state bank, for example)what
  27. Foofighter
    Foofighter April 13 2016 04: 18
    0
    The word "national guard" in the article (more precisely in the commentary), despite its name, has never been encountered winked
    by the way in Switzerland the whole country is the national guard
  28. major124
    major124 April 13 2016 04: 46
    -2
    Yes, there is no alternative to GDP yet, and it is not known how soon it will appear ... In any case, I cannot imagine anyone (without a shudder) in the president’s place, except for Putin
  29. major124
    major124 April 13 2016 04: 51
    -5
    By the way, about the National Guard. "National" - what is it like? Russian or Russian? If Russian, then this is not correct. We have both Mordovians, Chechens, and in general, Russia is a multinational and multi-confessional state .... So what nation or nationality is this guard? , they are all Ukrainians there .... By the way, there is no such nationality - Ukrainians ... A nation can be .... So how?
  30. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 April 13 2016 06: 40
    0
    Russia must get rid of the self-styled "elite" creeping before foreigners and not respecting or appreciating the great Russian people.
    Ivan the Terrible made Russia a single strong state with a stable population growth, regular army, printing, mining, metallurgy, etc. The territory of Russia during his reign increased 5 times.
    The boyar elite after his death proclaimed him a villain and invited the Pole to the kingdom. The people had to take the dispensation of Russia into their own hands.
    Peter I grovelled in front of any foreigners, historians write with affection that the Swedes who came to Russia to rob, rape and kill, he called "teachers" in state institutions there was a dominance of foreigners, the population of Russia decreased by a third, the economy was ruined and survived only thanks to the surviving reforms of Ivan the Terrible, which were attributed to Peter. He is held in high esteem by the elite.
    Stalin from an agrarian country created a Great Power, the population of Russia under him increased by 40 million people, the "elite" lists him as a villain.
    Scoundrels and traitors Gorbachev and Yeltsin destroyed the USSR and undermined the forces of Russia, but for the "elite" they are reformers and democrats. The results of perestroika - the loss of more than 10 million people due to increased mortality and the complete collapse of the economy inherited from the Stalinist USSR.
    Putin is trying to revive the army and economy of Russia, so for the greedy selfish "elite" he is a tyrant and dictator.
    Brotherhoods, or maybe our "elite" is just ... it just pops up when the country is reforming.
  31. ramzes1776
    ramzes1776 April 13 2016 07: 43
    0
    Quote: Corporal
    I still cannot understand the role of OVO and FSUE Okhrana. These structures are designed to provide security services on a contractual basis.
    True, there is a list of state objects subject to protection only by these units (state bank, for example)what

    And I don’t understand why they gave the permit system to the guard ???
  32. sa-ag
    sa-ag April 13 2016 07: 56
    0
    "... but in the creation (and even so fast!) of Putin's power structure, few believed to the end. Here it appeared. This is great, as it greatly unties the hands of the president. This is great news, which dramatically increases the chances that the future of our country will not be made in the "barracks" style and not in the "Vietnamese sweatshop" style, but will be comfortable, efficient and polite. I congratulate you on this. "

    What delightful illusions does an author's power structure ever make life comfortable, because it is 100% costly, and who will replenish the budget? Accessibility of medicine, quality education, development of industry, which provides jobs and, in general, a goal for society, can make life comfortable.
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. lopvlad
    lopvlad April 13 2016 08: 04
    +3
    If it seems to someone that, for example, it is necessary to "give all power to the patriotic security officials," then this someone is a very naive person. A country that functions like the Russian army of the period before Serdyukov, of course, can terrify others and make great achievements, but it will be rather uncomfortable to live in it.

    the patriotism of the siloviki is the guarantee of the existence of an independent and sovereign state under any president and not under a patriotic president.
    As for life in such a country, we lived in it and the name of the USSR lived in it comfortably. We began to live uncomfortable in the 90s and now you will not find someone who would not fear for his future (except for officials and oligarchs, of course).
  35. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn April 13 2016 08: 27
    +1
    "With what I congratulate you ...." There is nothing to congratulate us with - we have already gone through civil strife in the power structures many times: NKVD and MGB, KGB and MVD, KGB and GRU .... From modern after " prosecutor's "case of the FSB with the Investigative Committee against the GP and the Ministry of Internal Affairs? This is a new stage or further development of this confrontation or struggle for influence in the country! Putin decided to play it safe and defend the presidential power in the event of an aggravation of the situation in the country, and in the event that the above-mentioned confrontation becomes radical, that is, real "combat" actions between the security officials? As for Zolotov, an attempt was made on him at the end of February (thank God, unsuccessful), because is he the President's man and loyal to Putin, which naturally does not suit any of the parties seeking to "pull" Putin onto their "scales"?
  36. user3970
    user3970 April 13 2016 08: 31
    +5
    ramzes. Yes, this is a cop (police) feeder! If I am a soldier who wants to have a self-defense weapon, why and who should teach me how to use them "correctly" and moreover for the money that I pay to some murky private structure? On the bill, if you allow the free possession of short-barrels, "the Russians will shoot each other." In the Baltics and Moldova, the same former Russians live and free possession of ANY weapon, so what? Shoot each other? With regards to Vova Tambov ... a little out of topic ...
  37. guzik007
    guzik007 April 13 2016 08: 53
    +1
    Putin (this is a real miracle): =): =): =)
    --------------------------------------------
    I don’t remember where I read it: The best method of government is an absolute monarchy, provided that the king is a good, honest, decent, erudite person. : =)
  38. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh April 13 2016 10: 21
    +5
    "Putin (this is a real miracle) treats people as values" ////

    How old is a miracle?
    For another 15 years he will be able to "treat people
    (30-40 closest multi-millionaire friends) as value. " smile
    And then what?
  39. Demeter
    Demeter April 13 2016 13: 34
    +2
    What they are doing now is not the national guard. The National Guard is civilians who receive certain payments for being listed in the National Guard, having military weapons and equipment at home, in a sealed safe, which is opened in the event of an emergency. Such people periodically participate in military training and are a reserve of the Ministry of Emergencies and explosives.
    1. ramzes1776
      ramzes1776 April 13 2016 14: 00
      0
      Now to extend the permit for the trunk will not be the cops, but the national guards)))
  40. Mentat
    Mentat April 13 2016 17: 34
    0
    Quote: mihasik
    Quote: vodolaz
    But I can say one thing for fans of criticism: what would you do in its place?

    Communism, his mother!
    Where did they strive for 70 years and what did they dream about?

    Communism is a theoretical system that is impossible at the current level of a person’s personal and ethical development. You can dream as much as you like, but you have to work in the real world.
    1. Corsair5912
      Corsair5912 April 13 2016 17: 43
      0
      You are mistaken, communism is one of the oldest models of economics, and not a theoretical system.
      Communism (socialism) differs from capitalism in that under communism the tools and means of production are common, the results of labor are distributed according to the labor contribution and therefore it is impossible to live off parasites on other people. Who does not work, he does not receive anything from public funds, if he is able to work.
      In the Stone Age, people hunted large animals together, and prey was divided according to their contribution to the common cause; those who sat in bushes did not get anything.
  41. Mentat
    Mentat April 14 2016 23: 56
    0
    Quote: Corsair5912
    You are mistaken, communism is one of the oldest models of economics, and not a theoretical system.
    Communism (socialism) differs from capitalism in that under communism the tools and means of production are common, the results of labor are distributed according to the labor contribution and therefore it is impossible to live off parasites on other people. Who does not work, he does not receive anything from public funds, if he is able to work.
    In the Stone Age, people hunted large animals together, and prey was divided according to their contribution to the common cause; those who sat in bushes did not get anything.

    You have pink glasses a meter thick. Where did you get them, adult seemingly intelligent person, mysteriously and surprisingly.

    First, communism <> socialism, as you put it in brackets. These are completely different systems. If elements and whole structures of a full-fledged socialist society ("developed socialism") worked in the USSR and even now work in a smaller volume in some Western countries (Sweden, Finland, Norway), then communism is not possible at the current level of psychological, ethical, moral development of a person in general, in principle.

    Secondly, about the Stone Age, you generally have porridge, vinaigrette and pasta in your head. "Primitive communism" has nothing to do with what you dream about, and what was previously called the theoretical system. Only one word matches.

    If you are so interested in primitive society, read in more detail what orders reigned there, and do not build yourself blissful illusions.

    To build a really working communist system, a person needs to change a lot. This is not a matter of the near (probable) future.
  42. Shadow of darkness
    Shadow of darkness 6 September 2017 16: 12
    0
    What nonsense! All around artiodactyls, one king, we have God's dandelion. Since when did a politician become a philanthropist? The author decided to troll others using Aesop language ?! This is how readers should be despised in order to write such scandalous articles!