The Hague court will not initiate proceedings on the deaths of civilians in the Donbass

87
The International Criminal Court in The Hague (ICC) refused to initiate proceedings on the facts of civilian deaths in the unrecognized republics of Donbass due to the fact that the circumstances stated in the statement do not fall under its jurisdiction, the newspaper reports Look.

The Hague court will not initiate proceedings on the deaths of civilians in the Donbass


“The court can only exercise jurisdiction over international crimes if (I) its jurisdiction was recognized by the state in whose territory the crime was committed, (ii) its jurisdiction was recognized by the state of the accused person, or (iii) the situation is transferred to the prosecutor Security Council, acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter ",
the ICC prosecutor’s lawyer Igor Trunov said in an official response.

The prosecutor noted that “none of the conditions is fulfilled in relation to the situation described, the alleged violations do not fall under the jurisdiction of the court”.

At the same time, he said that the received "information is stored in the court archives in case the conditions change."

Last January, Igor Trunov reported that “a statement about the investigation into the facts of crimes against humanity committed by officials of Ukraine was accepted for consideration (by the court in The Hague) and communication was started on it”.
87 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +25
    April 9 2016 12: 03
    ... uki !!!!! what else to say am
    1. +16
      April 9 2016 12: 05
      At the same time, he said that the received "information is stored in the court archives in case the conditions change."


      And they are afraid that the wind may change, well, well.
      1. +11
        April 9 2016 12: 18
        It is clear from whose supply everything happens in the south-east of Ukraine. Once again, the West burned!
        1. +14
          April 9 2016 17: 12
          In fact
          A court may only exercise jurisdiction over international crimes if (I) its jurisdiction has been recognized by the state in whose territory the crime was committed,
          wherein
          In February 2015, the Verkhovna Rada asked to take war crimes committed in Ukraine under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court since February 20, 2014. The corresponding resolution was supported by 271 deputies.

          Consequently, the Hague court recognizes that the territories of the DPR and LPR in which murders and crimes against humanity were committed is not part of Ukraine, i.e. in fact recognized their independence.
          It remains the case for small. The LNR and DNR parliaments ratify the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and submit an instrument of ratification to the Hague Court on their own, on behalf of independent states.
    2. +29
      April 9 2016 12: 05
      Quote: maximNNX
      ... uki !!!!! what else to say am

      The Hague Court will not institute

      Such only bananas on palm trees excite and fried on a spit enemies of a neighboring tribe: the ICC prosecutor Fatu Bensuda
      1. +37
        April 9 2016 12: 25
        I do not want to say anything bad about women, but mind you, as soon as something connected in politics with dirty, unscrupulous and simply mean, so more and more Westerners are led by "women".
        Short list: Carla Del Ponte, A. Merkel, H. Clinton, M. Albright, Condoleezza Rice, Ashton, Psaki, Samantha Power, etc., and for the most part terrible that there will not be enough vodka or like Dahl, formerly body, and now political
        1. +17
          April 9 2016 12: 49
          and you thought they would judge themselves, they can only judge Serbs, Russian and other Slavs, as well as Arabs, Copts, Asians. but they will never judge their minions.
          1. +1
            April 9 2016 17: 29
            Quote: hedgehog in the fog
            and you thought they would judge themselves, they can only judge Serbs, Russian and other Slavs, as well as Arabs, Copts, Asians. but they will never judge their minions.

            Yes, just in those territories there is NO OIL OR GAS! And coal to transport from Ukraine is expensive!
            So there is no interest, therefore:
            The International Criminal Court in The Hague (ICC) refused to initiate proceedings on the deaths of civilians in the unrecognized republics of Donbass due to the fact that the circumstances set forth in the application do not fall under its jurisdiction
          2. +6
            April 9 2016 17: 51
            james
            I do not want to say anything bad about women, but mind you, as soon as something connected in politics with dirty, unscrupulous and simply mean, so more and more Westerners are led by "women".

            You correctly noticed, but did not understand why this is happening.
            The fact that exposing a woman to such high posts is an important psychological technique for the men who stand behind them to evade these men from responsibility.
            For example, this technique was used by psychologists during the collapse of his financial pyramid "MMM", whom Mavrodi hired to save his personal life from the hand-to-hand anger of the angry crowd of investors he had deceived, and also to simply keep the crowd from pogrom the main office while to evacuate with the loot abroad. Therefore, for this, instead of Mavrodi, a woman psychologist who was allegedly a high-ranking employee of MMM constantly communicated and spoke to the people with the crowd of robbed MMM depositors on his behalf at the risk of her own life. Moreover, psychologists for this role deliberately chose the WOMAN, not the MAN. It is noteworthy that no one from the crowd even asked about her identity documents, or who she actually works in the company and whether she works at all. And she gave people bliss-reassuring bluff promises, urging everyone to just wait a little while the situation was cleared up. As a result of dragging out the time to "clarify" the situation and NOT submitting a timely application against Mavrodi to the prosecutor's office, Mavrodi successfully hid from depositors with all the stolen money, if I am not mistaken, right abroad. It took Mavrodi, in my opinion, a month. And the lady psychologist, who during all this time pretended to be almost the main employee of "MMM" and urged the victims of Mavrodi to wait, immediately disappeared from sight, and the lock on the doors of the main office of "MMM" hung forever.
            The fact is that, according to the laws of psychology, women are trusted more in vital matters than men, since it is believed that a woman, as a physically weak and fearful being, will not lie to people - she will simply be afraid of physical retribution. This is an erroneous opinion, for there may be exceptions to any rule. Firstly, a woman can also be bribed for a lot of money, which makes her "lose" her head. Secondly, she can also be manipulated if she has a pronounced inferiority complex. (Hence, many women leaders are ugly from a young age.) A man, psychologically, compared to women, is characterized by adventurism and perseverance due to the superiority of his physical data. As a result, it is sometimes easier to pressure a woman leader than a man. This feature of the psychological difference between men and women began to be widely used in the West in psychological wars in countries with external control. Namely, if the Minister of Defense is a woman, then this, as a rule, is done by the authorities not because of their professional military training and suitability for waging war, but only for appearance - so that the population of the country would more trust in their comprador government representatives who are under external control. Behind her, the decision is still made by military men, as a rule, from other countries. Currently from the USA.
            1. 0
              April 9 2016 23: 42
              Bent you, buddy :-)
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. +14
          April 9 2016 13: 09
          I do not want to say bad things about women, but mind you, as soon as something connected in politics with dirty, unscrupulous and simply mean, so more and more Westerners are led by "women".

          Very, very rarely women in politics and in general in power bring at least some benefit, they usually leave behind chaos and smoking ruins, there are thousands of examples in history. The business of women is the family and the upbringing of children, but as soon as she gets into power, the main thing in her life becomes career, fame, universal reverence, and as they say "we will not stand the price", mountains of corpses and ruined economies are nonsense, even their wealth and money not as seductive as a photo on the cover of a famous magazine, even if it is associated with some kind of scandal or blunder, Grybauskaite (a communist from the Baltic states) is a vivid example of this. am Although, of course, among men it is full of politicians similar to women ... laughing
          1. +7
            April 10 2016 03: 48
            Even in the "aquarium" they taught that the most cruel murderers are women, never turn your back. The last example is this Ukropovskaya maniac, let her sit "softly"
            Kinder, kirchen, kitchen seems to have said the classic - and rightly so.
        3. +7
          April 9 2016 14: 25
          ... I’ll continue the list, the ministers of defense of Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland are also women.
      2. +1
        April 9 2016 14: 12
        Quote: Baikonur
        Quote: maximNNX
        ... uki !!!!! what else to say am

        The Hague Court will not institute

        Such only bananas on palm trees excite and fried on a spit enemies of a neighboring tribe: the ICC prosecutor Fatu Bensuda

        Oh yo !!!
        Yeah! (C)
        Here, as they say, without words.
      3. 0
        April 9 2016 23: 40
        Hmmmm joy
    3. +36
      April 9 2016 12: 31
      Cynical and that says it all. They would simply say that the genocide of the Russian-speaking population is not our competence and we do not consider them to be people and we do not need publicity / hype. Now, if fagots or lesbians there infringed on that is another matter.
      Rotten European court system of double standards.
      1. +1
        April 9 2016 13: 20
        Quote: seti
        Cynical and that says it all.


        Meanwhile, the right-wingers are doing something that even Himmler's bone-crushers have not thought of. Sometimes seditious thought comes to mind - is such a state entitled to BE?
        (cry.)
      2. +12
        April 9 2016 13: 22
        but the "genocide" of the Kosovars, which did not exist, turned out to be very much within their competence.
        in general, they themselves admitted that in their competence only pro-Western tales.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +11
      April 9 2016 12: 43
      If the Hague Court was to be consistent, then he screwed up the Serbian leadership. After all, Serbia at the time of the civil war was part of Yugoslavia. Although attempts to strain the Hague against Russia in Chechnya or Georgia in the South O. ended with nothing.
      However, the first hundreds of claims from residents of the Donbass to the state of Ukraine for compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage went to Helsinki. So let's see.
      As for the war crimes of the Kuyeva Junta, the court will certainly be. And the Ukrainian people will judge them.
    6. +2
      April 9 2016 13: 05
      That's right, the law is the law! As much as we would not like and it was fair! There remains the option of creating a court ourselves and judging juntas and dogs from the right sector and others like them!
      1. +1
        April 9 2016 13: 32
        This so-called ICC, by its refusal, clearly and clearly showed in whose interests it "works" and whose pocket tool it is.
        In addition, it is shown that “a court may only exercise jurisdiction over international crimes if (I) its jurisdiction was recognized by the state in whose territory the crime was committed, (II) its jurisdiction was recognized by the state of which the accused person is a citizen, or ( III) the situation is referred to the prosecutor by the Security Council acting on the basis of Chapter VII of the UN Charter, ”from which it becomes clear that those who died at the hands of ukrofascists are not the right kind for them. What can we talk about further?
        Here she is - an evil empire. In his best.
    7. +2
      April 9 2016 14: 12
      Quote: maximNNX
      ... uki !!!!! what else to say am

      It is high time to judge this gang of judges of the Hague court, it is necessary to search for hypocritical bastards.
      1. +1
        April 9 2016 23: 48
        I went out for a cigarette, you fagots forbidden to sell alcohol, they did not beat the creature ... I hate it.
        1. 0
          April 9 2016 23: 57
          Quote: Ik Cat
          Went out for a cigarette You are forbidden to sell fagots alcohol, not beaten critters ... I hate it.

          Cat, sorry, of course .. I re-read your phrase many times, something like the following happened in my brain:

          Went out for cigarettes you homosexuals told me that you can’t sell me alcohol .. a little not beaten, creatures .. hate.

          So?

          And even if so - did you like to go for cigarettes, but what about alcohol? wink

          No offense, only really interested Yes
    8. +1
      April 9 2016 15: 13
      Why. Saakashvili is wanted by the ICC for war crimes. The point is that Durkaina refused to join the protocol "until the end of hostilities", without mutual consent, a UN Security Council resolution is needed, and there are two vetoes guaranteed from the United States and GB.
      But the prosecutor is culturally trolling. On the Maidan, Ukraine itself appealed to the ICC, and the Donetsk and Odessa events were a continuation of the Maidan.
      In general, Mishiko’s fate should kind of hint: he isn’t allowed in the United States, the EU is on the international wanted list as a war criminal, in Georgia he is wanted for the murders of competitors and the dispersal of demonstrations - here and there the PZhZ shines. And after Israel they may not let him go to Israel for cooperation with the Nazis. Only in Turkey, on Erdogan, as well as Poroshenko already alone naked on a hanger. The fate of the products number 2 - used and abandoned. The states will not protect anyone from the Ukrainian authorities in the event of a coup, or even democratic removal (which the VNA is impossible).
    9. 0
      April 9 2016 17: 10
      The Lord is not the topic, but in the wake of Kasyanov, Mr. Ryzhkov got into a hidden cell. One of the leaders of the opposition, is studying party lists. wassat
      Strictly 18 +
      https://vimeo.com/161907217
    10. 0
      April 10 2016 17: 37
      Double standards policy in action! Serbs can be judged, but dill not - this is disgusting (to say the least!).
  2. +14
    April 9 2016 12: 04
    I don’t even want to read after the title of the article ... Yes, one boy or girl. Killed in the Donbass is not worth thousands of tolerant adults e
  3. PKK
    +4
    April 9 2016 12: 05
    The prosecutor, who has dismissed the initiation of the case of the murder of the civilian population of Ukraine, thinks that he will be safe after that. He is unintelligent after that.
  4. +2
    April 9 2016 12: 05
    The level of Russophobia in Europe rolls over. From European Russophobia, one could not have expected anything else.
  5. +8
    April 9 2016 12: 06
    Then the OSCE is not fucking doing there !!!
  6. +5
    April 9 2016 12: 06
    Another classic example of European hypocrisy.
    1. +2
      April 9 2016 14: 27
      Quote: Abbra
      Another classic example of European hypocrisy.

      But many here in every post called for sending the Kiev junta to The Hague. So what now say, tolerant seekers of justice in sub-judicial courts?
      The same goes for appeals to the UN, OSCE, and other crap.
  7. +8
    April 9 2016 12: 09
    Well, you have to send this "court" in The Hague to a well-known address.
    1. +5
      April 9 2016 13: 00
      Quote: user3970
      Well, you have to send this "court" in The Hague to a well-known address.

      Yes, it seems like they already sent it.
      in December, the Federation Council approved a law giving the federal Constitutional Court the right to declare impossible the enforcement in Russia of decisions of international courts. According to the amendments, the Constitutional Court may declare unenforceable the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and other international courts if they conflict with the Russian Constitution.
  8. +2
    April 9 2016 12: 11
    Attention! Who is surprised by this decision - that ... well, for example, a nerd! Or goof.
    But in general, we FSUs for all the decisions of this booth.
    1. +1
      April 9 2016 14: 32
      Quote: erased
      us FSUs for all decisions of this booth.

      One side:
      “The Russian Federation signed the Rome Statute on September 13, 2000, but has not yet ratified it and, therefore, is not a member of the International Criminal Court. At the same time, Russia cooperates with the ICC and participates in its work as an observer.
      A number of countries are fundamentally opposed to the very idea of ​​the ICC as limiting the sovereignty of states and giving indefinitely broad competences to the court; among them the United States, China, India, Israel and Iran. "

      And we, as it were, did not ratify, but we "cooperate", as they wrote about the All-Belarusian father - "on two chairs ..." wink
      1. 0
        April 9 2016 18: 11
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: erased
        us FSUs for all decisions of this booth.

        One side:
        “The Russian Federation signed the Rome Statute on September 13, 2000, but has not yet ratified it and, therefore, is not a member of the International Criminal Court. At the same time, Russia cooperates with the ICC and participates in its work as an observer.
        A number of countries are fundamentally opposed to the very idea of ​​the ICC as limiting the sovereignty of states and giving indefinitely broad competences to the court; among them the United States, China, India, Israel and Iran. "

        And we, as it were, did not ratify, but we "cooperate", as they wrote about the All-Belarusian father - "on two chairs ..." wink

        We don't have one ass! There is, for example, the butt of the liberal-comprador government and others like it (in a different interpretation "the fifth column") ... The main thing is to put the right ass in the right place at the right time!)))) It is desirable in bulk, like pieces of meat on a skewer. ..
  9. +2
    April 9 2016 12: 12
    “None of the conditions are met in relation to the described situation, the alleged violations do not fall within the jurisdiction of the court.”

    Signal to Ukraine - continue your atrocities, as you are not jurisdictional. Top cynicism and hypocrisy. In addition, this statement once again emphasized that crimes against residents of the whole region are not interested in the ICC.
    1. +3
      April 9 2016 13: 13
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Signal to Ukraine - continue your atrocities

      Kolomoisky’s lawsuit against Russia, by the way, was accepted for consideration.
      These are the faces:
      1. +4
        April 9 2016 14: 05
        What do you want? Evgey evgeev will always protect!
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +6
    April 9 2016 12: 15
    Someone expected another? That is, formally, you can burn out the entire Donbass and nothing will happen? Does Assad fall under the jurisdiction of The Hague? With the disappearance of the USSR, the concept of "justice" has clearly lost its meaning. "Heavenly hundred" is "onizhedeti" and the children of Donbass are "larvae kol..da"? My vocabulary allows me to write a few phrases about Europe, but the moderators will not miss it, and dots will not bring complete satisfaction.
  12. +8
    April 9 2016 12: 18
    as for jurisprudence, I can argue with the prosecutor refusenik, but this is so, a pipe dream. but in our_ The Hague court on trial! for systematic inaction regarding our application. but when on the contrary claims are made against us, then they have excessive zeal manifested. even prosecutors appoint cannibals.
  13. +7
    April 9 2016 12: 22
    This is not a court for a long time, but an international criminal court on concepts. Since the time of the bombing of Yugoslavia. request
  14. +9
    April 9 2016 12: 28
    In the Ukrainian school, the teacher talks with the children: - Do you want stats, cola? -I will be rich in prazuvaty, hunted richly pennies, buy gold for my Zhinka, preciousness, fur coats ... - Well, and you, Patro, who want stats? - Zhinkoy Mykoly!
  15. HAM
    +9
    April 9 2016 12: 28
    Well, who is behind "Charlie" now! ?? Somehow it's not a pity these fat Brussels ... They can say: "ordinary people are not to blame!" - they are guilty and how! They are guilty of their own hypocrisy when they get hot in their own ... so "guard" !! And in Donbass, it turns out, not people live! ?? Further untranslatable slang ...
    1. +1
      April 9 2016 12: 48
      They will probably understand it, but it can be very painful and expensive. Although they’re lying, they don’t understand anything and are used to solving their problems by thinking that everything can be bought. Poor folly and cynicism are new features of European behavior + good controllability of another country + easily fooled.
  16. +5
    April 9 2016 12: 33
    The Hague court will not initiate proceedings on the deaths of civilians in the Donbass
    The Hague court is instituted only when a command is given. As the team acted, they begin to excite themselves. In a word, ananis .. they. hi
  17. +5
    April 9 2016 12: 38
    That's how it is.
    During the hostilities in the territory of the former Yugoslavia, I wonder who was the subject of international law?
    Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, Albanians are citizens of the SFRY.
    The restoration of constitutional order, the fight against separatism, the prevention of mass repression in enclaves against the titular nation - this is recognized as a sufficient condition for initiating criminal cases against officials, prosecution, their arrest and conviction.
    And then the recognition of mass repressions is necessary and sufficient condition for the restoration of constitutional order, previously violated by the coup.

    Those. I, as a result of a coup d'etat, who came to power, organized or allowed to intimidate, with my tacit consent, to carry out auto-da-fe, as a result of which my fellow citizens clearly expressed disagreement, make a decision to restore order in accordance with the constitution, which I did not give a damn about.

    Back side.
    I, the legitimately elected president, seeing the imminent destruction of the state, as a result of the unleashed domestic struggle of all against all, make the only available decision - the destruction of the hotbeds of separatism aimed at destroying the state, eliminating dissent, and genocide on ethnic and religious grounds.
    And they judge me for it.
    Because I acted within the framework of the rights granted to me.

    Oh.
    These tolerags will play out.
  18. +1
    April 9 2016 12: 39
    “The court can only exercise jurisdiction over international crimes if (I) its jurisdiction was recognized by the state in whose territory the crime was committed, (ii) its jurisdiction was recognized by the state of the accused person, or (iii) the situation is transferred to the prosecutor Security Council, acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter ",

    It is interesting which of these points in this case was judged by officials from the former and bombed NATO of Yugoslavia ???
    In general, it is high time to score on all these international bodies - the truth must be sought on the battlefield - who is stronger is right.
    1. +2
      April 9 2016 13: 37
      “A court may only exercise jurisdiction over international crimes if
      (I) its jurisdiction was recognized by the state in whose territory the crime was committed,
      (Ii) its jurisdiction has been recognized by the state of which the accused is a national,

      I don’t understand any foie gras.
      (I) Has the Hague court recognized Donbass as a state?
      (Ii) Ukraine does not recognize the jurisdiction of the Hague court?
      1. +1
        April 9 2016 13: 44
        Quote: sabakina
        “A court may only exercise jurisdiction over international crimes if
        (I) its jurisdiction was recognized by the state in whose territory the crime was committed,
        (Ii) its jurisdiction has been recognized by the state of which the accused is a national,

        I don’t understand any foie gras. Ukraine does not recognize the jurisdiction of the Hague court? Or did the Hague court recognize Donbass as a state?

        (in joke order): None. This Hague court does not recognize LDNR as the territory of Ukraine .. which is good wink

        PS: for "no foie gras" - thanks Yes
  19. 0
    April 9 2016 12: 41
    The Hague court will not initiate proceedings on the deaths of civilians in the Donbass
    And what, someone else expected from them?
  20. 0
    April 9 2016 12: 42
    The concept of the Hague court and justice - has turned into an axymoron.
  21. +1
    April 9 2016 12: 44
    At the same time, he said that the received "information is stored in the court archives in case the conditions change."



    It’s not right to call this court a court. This is not an international court, but a banal trial of selective execution. And you see, they kept it just in case, yeah, when they give a team. In Yugoslavia there were reasons and there aren’t any in Donbass ???? In the Donbass that no people live ??? am am
    In this case, understand me as you like, but in order for those creatures in the trial in The Hague to see the grounds, they themselves need to go through everything that people living in Donbass have gone through and are going through. European hamsters without any compassion for others, but with a very great self-pity and understanding, if it comes to such creatures, it is only through colossal "joy" unfortunately. Ugh on such.
  22. +1
    April 9 2016 12: 49
    Hmm ... So Karadzic can be judged, although he defended his country from collapse and from the Amer’s fascists, and the Natsiks, led by Poroshenko, are beyond jurisdiction for killing civilians of their own country. And do these humanoid toothy judges decide the fate of humanity? Yes pah on you. By their actions, these magistrates rally the Russian people even more. The court in the Hague only deals with stolen knickers from a rope in the yard - this is its level.
  23. +1
    April 9 2016 12: 51
    The Hague court has outlived itself! We need to create a new alternative court with a system of compulsory execution of its decisions, which, through its objective and professional actions, would show The Hague all its flaws and bankruptcy. What would they understand in their West that t / w / a / r / and those who kill Russian people will be unambiguously convicted and held accountable despite their Russophobic cries!
    1. +2
      April 9 2016 14: 07
      Quote: qwert111
      The Hague court has outlived itself! We need to create a new alternative court ...


      First you need to once again (???) announce to the whole world, stop that Russian legislation prevails over all sorts of The Hague and other legislative "vyors" ...

      Russia is a self-sufficient country, and has every right not to build its future according to someone’s model and not to evaluate actions on any scale of Euro-values ​​...
      1. 0
        April 11 2016 08: 14
        Quote: yuriy55
        The Hague court has outlived itself! We need to create a new alternative court ...


        But to creep and condemn that Gagaga court in Perm, Barnaul, Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk, Anadyr, Norilsk, and no matter what court, if only justice would triumph. And the entire Hague trailer, for a week at least. So that it would be disgraceful in the future. Dib..la, b..t.
  24. +2
    April 9 2016 13: 03
    "But there is also God's judgment, the thimbles of depravity,
    there is a formidable court
    he is not subject to the ringing of gold ... ".
    Something like that with Mikhail Yuryevich.
    Although on a different topic, Lermontov actually wrote. And stop waiting for the Judgment of God. TIME TO SOLVE the issue with these bloody clowns.
    These obsemartishki corpses of raped girls in the Donbass point blank will never see, they are sick all over the head. What tries for 4 days to the war with dill, if Shoigu for the day half of the western region throws to the Far East, with technology ??? A day or two. We waited until the power in the Donbass arises. No, they squabbled among themselves. Azarov to Kukan and to the presidency of Eastern Ukraine, who opposed to the west. We’ll fly into the money again, but you have to solve something with these zombies. I do not have a single relative from Ukraine and have been there only on business, but I simply can’t look at IT. Damn it . We received a good piston aft from the states, we must admit it. It’s time to behave like a plowman in the zone, such a time, well, deer do not understand differently, and if someone is dissatisfied, then you can give it in the face. Good nafig.
  25. 0
    April 9 2016 13: 17
    And who was waiting for something else? To judge the pro-fascist Bandera junta? But how can you, these are the "fighters for democracy", future EU members ... And, what, has even the association covered up? Well, all the same - ours in the board. Have you killed your people? And who saw? Boeing shot down? So the "lop-eared hegemon" himself gave permission, otherwise Merkel "did not break down" on the sanctions. No, gentlemen - not the power of law (this is for suckers), but the right of power!
  26. +2
    April 9 2016 13: 26
    They will answer us for Chinganchkuk ...!
  27. 0
    April 9 2016 13: 29
    Let them wit for now. After all, history develops in a spiral ... and Natalya Poklonskaya in Crimea is already honing her professionalism and claws stop
    1. +2
      April 9 2016 14: 19
      Quote: skaramaks27
      Let them wit for now. After all, history develops in a spiral ... and Natalya Poklonskaya in Crimea is already honing her professionalism and claws stop

      This woman will still show the whole world ..! PROSECUTOR .. with a capital letter!
  28. 0
    April 9 2016 14: 02
    Europe played with concepts. Tomorrow the Bormaleans will be offended by Europe because there are no lawsuits against ISIS and those who have joined them and will arrange their own court for them (God forbid the victims).
  29. 0
    April 9 2016 14: 05
    "" A court can only exercise jurisdiction over international crimes if (i) its jurisdiction has been recognized by the state in whose territory the crime was committed, (ii) its jurisdiction has been recognized by the state of which the accused is a national, or (iii) the situation is transferred to the prosecutor by the Security Council acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter "...

    The question is - and why the goat button accordion ??? !!!

    And, in general, for Russia for a long time it is necessary not to take into account the decisions of this incomprehensible organization ... They are not worth it ... It’s simple - the Hague court is the same bastard merde — the servant of one owner, like the others, including not only PACE, but also the UN ...
  30. 0
    April 9 2016 14: 11
    Of course, do people live in the Donbass? so that the international Hague court, the fairest court on planet Earth, will spend its precious time for them.
  31. 0
    April 9 2016 14: 16
    I did not expect anything else ... Justice is there for the elect am
    1. +1
      April 9 2016 14: 22
      Quote: Gypsy
      I did not expect anything else ... Justice is there for the elect am

      Guess to Russia ... Dear ..! hi
  32. +1
    April 9 2016 14: 34
    Do not want - do not! People living there will conduct their own trial. But then - do not complain!
  33. +8
    April 9 2016 15: 10
    There could be no other, there was no go-ahead for the so-called "trial."
  34. +1
    April 9 2016 15: 18
    Mra ** zi, there is nothing more to say.
  35. +1
    April 9 2016 15: 41
    yes send entugaaga with her court to hell!
  36. 0
    April 9 2016 15: 49
    Everything is clear. Nuremberg. Only Nuremberg will help.
  37. 0
    April 9 2016 15: 51
    There is nothing surprising in such a verdict. There are no doubts about the double or triple standards of the West for a long time. And the word "democracy" is a cover for promoting their interests. Well, for our hamster ...
  38. +1
    April 9 2016 16: 42
    To paraphrase a little ... What a parish, such a pop ... sad
  39. 0
    April 9 2016 16: 44
    This court is afraid of shouting from the USA; it will never be objective.
  40. 0
    April 9 2016 17: 11
    Who would doubt that !!! Double standards, and what if the crime was committed against “just” a person? the same su..ki will look for statehood ??? !!!
  41. 0
    April 9 2016 17: 12
    This court is completely a project of the arrogant Saxons. What kind of objectivity can we talk about ...
  42. +4
    April 9 2016 18: 07
    The Hague court will not initiate proceedings on the deaths of civilians in the Donbass


    This is not why the court in The Hague was created to judge the true killers !!! Moreover, "who are the judges ?!" It's time to create a judgment of the peoples of the world over fascists of all stripes and their patrons !!!
  43. +1
    April 9 2016 18: 45
    We will have our own Hague. Somewhere near Rostov. And documentary evidence of the crimes of the Kiev junta, more than enough ...
  44. 0
    April 9 2016 19: 11
    Applying the logic of the Hague Tribunal, in his reply to the Donbass, to the Tribunal itself - we must urgently begin the bombing of the Hague - they will not object ANYTHING !!
  45. The comment was deleted.
  46. +2
    April 9 2016 19: 59
    The highest degree of hypocrisy of European crap democracy.
  47. +1
    April 9 2016 20: 03
    The International Criminal Court in The Hague (ICC) And what did this arbiter generally decide on its own in truth and justice? What decision was made on the crimes of p.i.d.o.s.i.i. and their mongrel regarding the countries they plundered and destroyed? And for what kind of merit do we have to recognize the decisions of a bunch of idiots controlled by money tolthosums? Speak international so it is necessary to include in the composition and representatives of those countries that are real patriots of their country, and destroyed by these bourgeois. Then we’ll see what decision will be made on certain facts of crimes. And be sure to put on the dock the perpetrators of the unleashed wars, starting with the leaders of the gang called lice and ending with the last bucket with his stomps. And then it will be both international and fair and accepted by all. And now this is just a mockery of justice.
  48. 0
    April 9 2016 20: 13
    The Hague court, cynical rabble!
  49. 0
    April 9 2016 20: 40
    Arab emigrants have already arrived !! .... Inhumans from Europe will soon choke on their shit! Debaltseve.
  50. 0
    April 10 2016 00: 01
    The Hague thing, "Well, it's not a face, it's not a face, it's her / him / her face like that," a phrase from an old h.f., and another phrase - M.N. Zadornov, they say that's why they became ...., well and n ... s and in Africa -..., country 404 should become a ceurope, maybe then they will suck.
  51. 0
    April 10 2016 00: 13
    This means that the Hague Tribunal is aware of its guilt, but is not yet ready to repent. But if the United States is forced to accept “Dynamo Kiev” into the league of the chosen ones, then perhaps... And they will also add Boeing and stolen paintings.
  52. +1
    April 10 2016 01: 45
    Quote: sergeybulkin
    Very, very rarely do women in politics and in power in general bring any benefit; they usually leave behind chaos and smoking ruins,

    Thank God our women belong to these rarities. Ekaterina 2, even though she is German, is OURS!
  53. 0
    April 10 2016 02: 06
    The Hague is not a court, but a trial seat. If there were a court there, then D. Bush, who never found chemical weapons, but turned the whole country into ashes, should have been hanged on the same rope as Saddam.
  54. 0
    April 10 2016 04: 44
    The events in Donbass are not within the jurisdiction of the ICC, but no one denies the crimes themselves and the need to condemn them. It is necessary to initiate the creation of an alternative international criminal court, taking into account the changed situation in the world. There will be work for him.