Military Review

Testing of satellite navigation system for spacecraft completed in RF

23
The RSC Energia designers have successfully completed flight tests of the autonomous satellite navigation system (ASN) for the Soyuz MS and Progress MS series spacecraft, as well as for the manned transport ship of the new generation, reports press office corporations.



“Flight tests have been successfully completed, now we are preparing documentation for putting the system into normal operation. There are no such satellite systems for spacecraft in the world capable of solving navigation tasks with such high accuracy ”,
quoted by the press service of one of the developers of the system Mikhail Mikhailov.

“The set of ASN equipment installed on the Progress MS and Soyuz MS spacecraft is 5-6 times cheaper than their foreign counterparts. We managed to achieve cost reduction by replacing many hardware with software solutions, ”he stressed.

It is noted that "a new autonomous navigation system that works with signals from GLONASS and GPS navigation satellite systems is being installed on the Soyuz MS and Progress MS series spacecraft, and is also expected to be installed on a new generation manned transport ship."

According to the information, “the system determines the parameters of the orbit of the spacecraft, its orientation, the solution of the relative navigation problem when approaching the ISS”.

“ASN includes four multidirectional receiving antennas installed on the ship, which are mathematically combined into one virtual antenna with a wide field of view. This allows for any orientation of the spacecraft to conduct continuous measurements on signals from 20 to 24 navigation satellites. This scheme provides high accuracy and reliability, “- said in a release.

According to the press service, “the system allows you to determine the parameters of the orbit of the ship by coordinates with an accuracy of 5 meters, regardless of its orientation. Orientation accuracy is 0,5 degrees. Relative coordinates at convergence are calculated to the accuracy of 1 m, but in the future it is planned to bring it to 3-4 cm. ”

Unique characteristics have been achieved, in particular, “due to the ability of the system to work simultaneously with two satellite constellations: GLONASS and GPS, while most Western space navigation systems work exclusively with GPS,” the corporation noted.
Photos used:
RSC Energia
23 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. 17085
      17085 April 9 2016 09: 36
      +8
      Not funny...

      In practice, this is the first step towards creating a second generation of spacecraft capable of independently (without telemetry from the ground) determining its location, and as a result, independently and accurately maneuvering in orbit.
      1. Baikonur
        Baikonur April 9 2016 11: 47
        +1
        Quote: 17085
        In practice, this is the first step towards creating a second generation of spacecraft

        Today it was shown in the news that the Ameripedes (SpaceX) successfully launched and landed (on the offshore platform their "Flacon 9" launch vehicle. Damn, the second generation of the launch vehicle is already working out.
        And this second generation of our spacecraft with ASN should have been there for a long time. Nothing complicated in the automation of the navigation system is not much. But the reusable 1st step is a serious step. To reduce the cost of putting the cargo into orbit (first let it be 2-3 tons).
        We also have developments, but something even on the "east" in the next min. It's not even planned to start for 10 years.

        PS:
        Quote: 17085
        without telemetry from the ground
        Incorrect. Telemetry is not from the ground, but vice versa, from spacecraft and launch vehicles - to the ground. ("Tele" - reception by means of radio communication, information about the state ("metry") of the LV or SC systems on the ground. He himself worked at the PRA stations (receiving and recording equipment, in the People's Republic - "PRASHKA" smile ), MA-9MKTM (in the folk - "Mashka" wink )
        hi
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 April 9 2016 12: 45
          +2
          Quote: Baikonur
          But the reusable 1st step is a serious step.

          ... really ?! ... firstly, it turned out for the first time out of many unsuccessful ones, and secondly, it could become the same dead end as the Space Shuttle program ... the most promising direction in the development of reusability and cheapening of cargo delivery into orbit is the development of aerospace aircraft ... well, developments on this topic were still under the USSR ... now it is not customary for us to shout at every corner what we are working on and what we have achieved and, from my point of view, an absolutely correct decision, a vivid example with hypersound, quietly and without excess noise and dust were planed-sculpted and taken out for testing "Zircon" ... hi
        2. 17085
          17085 April 9 2016 17: 50
          0
          Quote: Baikonur
          Today it was shown in the news that the Ameripedes (SpaceX) successfully launched and landed (on the offshore platform their "Flacon 9" launch vehicle. Damn, the second generation of the launch vehicle is already working out.
          And this second generation of our spacecraft with ASN should have been there for a long time. Nothing complicated in the automation of the navigation system is not much. But the reusable 1st step is a serious step. To reduce the cost of putting the cargo into orbit (first let it be 2-3 tons).
          We also have developments, but something even on the "east" in the next min. It's not even planned to start for 10 years.

          That's what I can’t understand, so why take fuel there and back, and not for a space plane, but for a rocket !? Who will answer if this block falls apart when reused? Where is the step forward? This is a squat in a circle ...
          The reusable first stage is at least a specialized aircraft, the rest from the crafty one.

          PS
          Quote: Baikonur
          Incorrect. Telemetry is not from the ground, but vice versa, from spacecraft and launch vehicles - to the ground. ("Tele" - reception by means of radio communication, information about the state ("metry") of the LV or SC systems on the ground. He himself worked at the stations PRA (receiving and recording equipment, in the People's Republic of Prashka), MA-9MKTM (in nar.- "Mashka")


          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%80%D
          0% B8% D1% 8F
          http://astronaut.ru/bookcase/books/sharp01/text/40.htm?reload_coolmenus
          develop, dear
          1. NordUral
            NordUral April 9 2016 20: 35
            0
            That's for sure (I'm talking about today's landing). Everything is too shaky and unreliable with such landings and with repeated launches.
            But this, if we also refine it with new technologies, is the song of the winners.
            http://epizodsspace.airbase.ru/bibl/pervushin/loz-loz/loz.html
            And what the hell knows what they are doing in "our" Roskosmos. If we are old songs, then such as in the picture and the like. Fortunately, the Union has done a lot of similar things.
          2. Baikonur
            Baikonur April 9 2016 23: 53
            +1
            I'll start with the second. (1st link - 404!)
            From 2 of your links -
            The word "telemetry" comes from the Greek tele - in the distance, far and metreo - measure ...
            That is exactly what I said. Transmission to a distance (in this case, by means of a radio signal), to the ground, to the one who controls, the operating parameters of the launch vehicle or spacecraft (or something else) for correction, control of what is being controlled. And not vice versa (on earth, what to measure with a spacecraft or a launch vehicle for its flight ?????) fool
            Now to the 1st question:
            Quote: 17085
            That's what I can’t understand.
            If you cannot understand, this does NOT mean at all that it is incomprehensible to others! laughing The development of reusable launch vehicles, and not launch vehicles, is not just underway.

            develop, dear
    2. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 April 9 2016 09: 37
      +2
      “The set of ASN equipment installed on the Progress MS and Soyuz MS spacecraft is 5-6 times cheaper than their foreign counterparts. We managed to achieve cost reduction by replacing many hardware with software solutions, ”he stressed.

      Oh, and if we had our own modern element base, where would this west be?
      1. PKK
        PKK April 9 2016 10: 41
        +1
        It is important not to forget when the states pulled into space one and a half megatons because of this, any connection became impossible for a day and a half, both with us and with them. The main struggle with the nuclear impulse.
  2. ZONE
    ZONE April 9 2016 09: 30
    0
    Your zone should be independent ... and MAIN RELIABLE!
  3. Abbra
    Abbra April 9 2016 09: 32
    +3
    Well, the news is very good ... I fantasized here: can you imagine, military operations begin with the United States. Our people board the Soyuz, leaving the Americans on board the ISS: - Well, we went on business!
    1. ZONE
      ZONE April 9 2016 09: 49
      -3
      Quote: Abbra
      Well, the news is very good ... I fantasized here: can you imagine, military operations begin with the United States. Our people board the Soyuz, leaving the Americans on board the ISS: - Well, we went on business!

      You cruel frayer ... Go out to the godfather! laughing
    2. NordUral
      NordUral April 9 2016 20: 38
      0
      Do not confuse astronauts with the State Department and the Pentagon.
  4. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 9 2016 09: 32
    +3
    The Russian alphabet and the words on the navigators' displays warm the soul and bursting with pride, others stare at Amer's letters and learn their language (although ours will also have to be learned), and after all, once we were "buried" even without music.
    1. nazar_0753
      nazar_0753 April 9 2016 09: 33
      +1
      If you did not know, Russian is the language of international communication in space (mainly on the ISS). And all astronauts are sure to learn it before sending it into orbit
  5. nazar_0753
    nazar_0753 April 9 2016 09: 34
    +2
    In general, good news from the domestic space sphere always warms the soul laughing
    1. forester
      forester April 9 2016 09: 48
      +2
      Quote: nazar_0753
      In general, good news from the domestic space sphere always warms the soul laughing

      Undoubtedly !!! But it does not diminish the bitterness from the destruction of the Buran program
  6. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 9 2016 09: 40
    0
    Quote: nazar_0753
    If you did not know, Russian is the language of international communication in space (mainly on the ISS). And all astronauts are sure to learn it before sending it into orbit

    I'm talking about GLONASS in principle!
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 April 9 2016 09: 49
    +2
    Perhaps this can be considered a gift for Cosmonautics Day.
  8. eskela
    eskela April 9 2016 09: 53
    +1
    something is being prepared, recently the topic of a nuclear engine has flashed now navigating, they want to build a base on the moon, well, not the Air Force but the VKS bully laughing
    1. Bramb
      Bramb April 10 2016 09: 34
      0
      A nuclear engine has been developed since the 60s of the last century. Even a plane was made.
      Here the difficulties are not in the engine itself, but in protecting it and safety.
      The design of the base on the moon was developed in Soviet times. The Americans have it too. Given the development of materials and technology, it must be adjusted. Another thing: when we really need helium 3. As soon as there will immediately be such a leap in technology that we can only dream of now.
      For the rest, yes, I agree: we are on the verge of something really great.)
  9. volodya
    volodya April 9 2016 10: 01
    +2
    Well done guys, they work! They still would not interfere!
    1. MIKHAN ..
      MIKHAN .. April 9 2016 10: 29
      0
      Quote: volodya
      Well done guys, they work! They still would not interfere!

      Our "calibers" were well oriented and there was a surprise for the West! Good job guys ... Thank you, keep it up and continue in the same spirit!
  10. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn April 9 2016 11: 29
    0
    Quote: forester
    Quote: nazar_0753
    \laughing

    Undoubtedly !!! But it does not diminish the bitterness from the destruction of the Buran program

    It is undoubtedly a pity that the "Buran" was buried, but it will rise from the ashes like a Phoenix bird, of course not in the same form with other performance characteristics, because the invaluable experience gained during its development, individual systems and elements are already working and will work today.
  11. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 April 9 2016 12: 01
    +1
    Quote: avg-mgn
    It is undoubtedly a pity that the "Buran" was buried, but it will rise from the ashes like a Phoenix bird, of course not in the same form with other performance characteristics, because the invaluable experience gained during its development, individual systems and elements are already working and will work today.

    Truly sorry. But! After all, the developments have remained and they are moving forward and something tells me that we are not far from multi-media devices and one day a statement will be made on the creation of this device. To see !!!
  12. Demeter
    Demeter April 10 2016 02: 11
    0
    This is the thing.
  13. Bramb
    Bramb April 10 2016 07: 39
    0
    Quote: PKK
    It is important not to forget when the states pulled into space one and a half megatons because of this, any connection became impossible for a day and a half, both with us and with them. The main struggle with the nuclear impulse.

    This is not entirely true.
    A space nuclear explosion was in 1962. And he disabled a third of the satellites. It sounds awful, but then there were only 30 of which 10 were out of order. 3 immediately, the other 7 - after a few months due to radiation. Well, ours had to adjust the launches of two or three ships.
    So, there is no question of any loss of "any connection".))
    And yes: we must not forget that the main damaging factor of nuclear weapons is the shock wave, and not the EMP at all.