Military Review

Pentagon: Launch of aircraft carrier John F. Kennedy is scheduled for 2020 g

64
The nuclear aircraft carrier John F. Kennedy, the second ship of its class, will be launched in 2020 g, reports RIA News Pentagon spokesman Shawn Stackley


Pentagon: Launch of aircraft carrier John F. Kennedy is scheduled for 2020 g


“In March, work on the construction of CVN79 (John F. Kennedy) was completed by 18%,” Stackley reported at a hearing in the Senate.

He also clarified that "the aircraft carrier CVN78 (Gerald Ford, which became the first of this series), is completed on 97% and will be handed over to the Navy in September after carrying out sea trials, which will begin in July."

According to the official, "the construction of the third CVN 80 (Enterprise) serial aircraft carrier is scheduled to begin in the 2018 year."

The first aircraft carrier Gerald Ford was laid in 2009. Since that time, its construction costs exceeded the initial estimate by 22%, reaching $ 12,9 billion. Due to the huge cost of the ship and regular delays during the construction phases, the Pentagon has been repeatedly criticized by US lawmakers.
Photos used:
Flickr / cmccain202dc
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Magic archer
    Magic archer April 8 2016 09: 52
    +10
    And why is Harrier in the photo ?! As far as I know on US nuclear carriers, they are not in the wings.
    1. Byshido_dis
      Byshido_dis April 8 2016 09: 54
      0
      And this despite the fact that in the states themselves there is a lot of debate about the effectiveness of aircraft carriers as a class! And despite the fact that the fleet itself recognized their inefficiency in the conditions of long-range anti-submarine missiles. In general, everything is as always, huge sums for construction are not clear for what, and a big, big sawed off ...
      1. bulvas
        bulvas April 8 2016 10: 00
        +3
        Quote: Magic Archer
        And why is Harrier in the photo ?! As far as I know on US nuclear carriers, they are not in the wings.


        Because they posted a photo of some ancient ship, very far from the described aircraft carrier John F. Kennedy.


        1. Shuttle
          Shuttle April 8 2016 10: 06
          +1
          A photo in 2013 was already on the Internet.
          http://www.eucom.mil/media-library/photo/25440/protectors-on-the-deck

          These are generally Italian Harriers.
          1. Thrall
            Thrall April 8 2016 10: 13
            +17
            The main thing is not to let Ukrainian officials into the aircraft carrier laughing
            1. _Vladislav_
              _Vladislav_ April 8 2016 10: 32
              +7
              Quote: Magic Archer
              And why is Harrier in the photo ?! As far as I know on US nuclear carriers, they are not in the wings.

              About 80 aircraft, helicopters and UAVs
              Planned: F-35C, F / A-18E / F, EA-18G, E-2D, C-2A, MH-60R / S.
              Multifunction radar AN / SPY-3. SAM Evolved Sea Sparrow. A number of escort ships (submarines) attached to the AUG.
              The aircraft carrier of the new series organically fits into the US offensive doctrine.
              AUG is basically a powerful connection. Of course, for the Pentagon military organization this is a success.

              PS
              On November 10, 2013, an aircraft carrier launch ceremony was held at the Newport News shipyard in Virginia. The bottle on the side of the ship was broken by Susan Ford Base, the daughter of Gerald Ford, whose name is the aircraft carrier.
              Carriers are beautiful creations, despite the fact that American, for the most part.
              1. Foofighter
                Foofighter April 8 2016 11: 05
                +1
                Quote: _Vladislav_
                Carriers are beautiful creations, despite the fact that American, for the most part.

                Also beautiful ... they also carried democracy and carried mainly opium
                1. Foofighter
                  Foofighter April 8 2016 11: 31
                  -2
                  ... and just as useful now.
              2. Zoldat_A
                Zoldat_A April 8 2016 13: 12
                +2
                Quote: _Vladislav_
                The aircraft carrier of the new series organically fits into the US offensive doctrine.

                The submarine "Lee Harvey Oswald" and the minelayer "Jack Ruby" are still there. And why - to perpetuate - so all the participants ... Moreover, there is still a big question, who won the bullet more - Kennedy or Oswald, who has all the fault - that he escaped to the Soviet Union ...
            2. Dormidont2
              Dormidont2 April 8 2016 11: 51
              0
              who knows if a vertical plane hangs in the air like a helicopter, does it continue to glow on the radar or not?
        2. Bayonet
          Bayonet April 8 2016 10: 26
          +5
          Quote: bulvas
          Because they posted a photo of some ancient ship, very far from the described aircraft carrier John F. Kennedy.


          This is generally an Italian ship!
          (cry)
      2. Yuri Y.
        Yuri Y. April 8 2016 10: 04
        +7
        Quote: Magic Archer
        And why is Harrier in the photo ?! As far as I know on US nuclear carriers, they are not in the wings.

        Well guys, it's time to get used to it. They usually mold a plot shot rather than an informational one. In the picture is an aircraft carrier? Aircraft carrier. Talk about them? About them. )))
      3. little girl15
        little girl15 April 8 2016 10: 05
        0
        Well, in principle, not a bad target for the Zircon. Which, I think, will be adopted by this time.
        1. ametist415
          ametist415 April 8 2016 10: 51
          0
          Estimate if the Russian commander of a ship goes off the roof and launches a rocket in the US nuclear power AB. The whole world will gang up against Russia. I think that the highest leadership of the country and the commanders of the ships are people with good intellect, not like some ordinary everyday Russians.
      4. Ze Kot
        Ze Kot April 8 2016 10: 48
        -1
        Quote: Byshido_dis
        And this despite the fact that in the states themselves there is a lot of debate about the effectiveness of aircraft carriers as a class! And despite the fact that the fleet itself recognized their inefficiency in the conditions of long-range anti-submarine missiles. In general, everything is as always, huge sums for construction are not clear for what, and a big, big sawed off ...


        The other day they said on TV that we were going to lay an aircraft carrier ... Something from the realm of fiction
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 8 2016 11: 07
          +3
          What's so fantastic about this?
          1. mvg
            mvg April 8 2016 11: 47
            +1
            Have you really presented a nuclear carrier at 90 tons in a Baltic shipyard? And 000 meters long? This is fantastic.

            // http://www.vedomosti.ru/management/articles/2016/04/08/636937-peterburgskie-rabo
            todateli-planiruyut-sokratit-bolee-sotrudnikov //

            But this is in the appendage.
            1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 8 2016 15: 25
              +1
              Quote: mvg
              Have you really presented an atomic aircraft carrier at the Baltic shipyards under 90 000 tons?

              As I understand it, it was about building an aircraft carrier, and not about building an aircraft carrier in the Baltic.
              Quote: mvg
              And 330 meters long? This is fantastic.

              I dare to ask, is the construction of two hundred and fifty-two-meter nuclear cruisers in the Baltic also fantastic? And if not, what is the fundamental difference between 252 meters and 330 meters? And why is it obligatory 330? Because the Krylovites, having smoked something thermonuclear, put the plague model of "Storm" on public ridicule?
              Ulyanovsk had 302 meters, 10,7 meters of precipitation (Kirov - 9,1м).
              Quote: mvg
              But this is in the appendage.

              Just what is it for?
          2. Ze Kot
            Ze Kot April 8 2016 22: 38
            0
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            What's so fantastic about this?



            Have a project?
            Is there a shipyard for this size?
            Are there people who have such experience?
            Do you have any equipment?
      5. weksha50
        weksha50 April 8 2016 11: 31
        -3
        Quote: Byshido_dis
        And despite the fact that the fleet itself recognized their inefficiency in the conditions of long-range anti-submarine missiles.



        Strange any these huge expenses ...

        For the nuclear triads of Russia and China, Amer’s AUGs are simply big targets, even with their most effective air defense ...

        And another question - will Russia or China let their aircraft approach their shores within the range of their aviation ??? In any case, they will "render them unusable" for combat use ...

        Chase-scare "banana" republics - aren't these "cool" aircraft carriers too expensive ???
      6. retardu
        retardu April 8 2016 15: 06
        +3
        Who acknowledged? Destroying aug is harder than it sounds. And if they are so useless, why are all countries with a developed fleet trying to build them?
    2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 8 2016 11: 05
      0
      So in the photo, and not an American aircraft carrier (no corner deck)
    3. Engineer
      Engineer April 8 2016 11: 07
      +1
      Quote: Magic Archer
      And why is Harrier in the photo ?! As far as I know on US nuclear carriers, they are not in the wings.


      Duck and CVN79 itself (John F. Kennedy) is not there yet)
  2. MIKHAN.
    MIKHAN. April 8 2016 09: 52
    -5
    Time has passed AUG USA ...))) Russia has tried!
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. kirpich
    kirpich April 8 2016 09: 55
    -7
    Well, let them build and launch them into the water. There will be goals for our SUSHK and MIGs
    Z. About TU I will not say anything
    1. ametist415
      ametist415 April 8 2016 10: 52
      +2
      Another one. oh ... and not one.
    2. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K April 8 2016 11: 32
      +3
      Quote: kirpich
      Well, let them build and launch them into the water. There will be goals for our SUSHK and MIGs
      Z. About TU I will not say anything

      Still who would let our planes to the American aircraft carrier strike group. It is only in peacetime that they are allowed to go to a certain distance, and during military operations they will be shot down without warning.
      Maybe I'm wrong, but I don’t remember something that Sushki and Migi were armed with heavy anti-ship cruise missiles.
      1. MIKHAN.
        MIKHAN. April 8 2016 13: 09
        -3
        Quote: Алексей_К
        Quote: kirpich
        Well, let them build and launch them into the water. There will be goals for our SUSHK and MIGs
        Z. About TU I will not say anything

        Still who would let our planes to the American aircraft carrier strike group. It is only in peacetime that they are allowed to go to a certain distance, and during military operations they will be shot down without warning.
        Maybe I'm wrong, but I don’t remember something that Sushki and Migi were armed with heavy anti-ship cruise missiles.

        Well, they are different ... Yes, they will destroy these coffins from afar with a massive blow and finish them off from the nuclear submarine! (or vice versa ..) coffins that can scare the "small countries" of Yugoslavia, Iraq, and the EU! In which case, these troughs will be immediately destroyed by Russia! ... And the US knows this ...
  5. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod April 8 2016 09: 56
    0
    The larger the target, the better - said the shooter
  6. Lemon1972
    Lemon1972 April 8 2016 09: 57
    +2
    Well, how could a picture be replaced ?? request Where did such rarities come from ??
    1. RUSS
      RUSS April 8 2016 10: 01
      +1
      Quote: Limon1972
      Well, how could a picture be replaced ?? request Where did such rarities come from ??

      It's all right?
  7. Altona
    Altona April 8 2016 09: 58
    +5
    Two things are unpleasant: 1) That the USA can still afford the construction of ships of this class and displacement; 2) That the US is building them pretty quickly compared to us. 6 years is not enough for such a ship of this class.
    1. kirpich
      kirpich April 8 2016 10: 00
      -3
      Let them build! The budget is not rubber.
    2. ametist415
      ametist415 April 8 2016 11: 07
      +5
      Which is not pleasant, some people who leave comments on this site think that we will drown the entire US fleet of the USA with several super nano rockets and one or two submarines. The fact that we nearly burned down two nuclear submarines during the repair, or built Project 22350 for almost ten years, and Project 11356, became outdated on the slipway. Few people think about this. When you cannot build large-scale high-tech ships in series, you just have to think that the Americans are fools, they are sawing the budget, and we will tear them into strips.
      1. MIKHAN.
        MIKHAN. April 8 2016 13: 35
        -1
        Quote: ametist415
        Which is not pleasant, some people who leave comments on this site think that we will drown the entire US fleet of the USA with several super nano rockets and one or two submarines.

        Do not believe it, but think about it, day and night, and since the days of the USSR! And I'll tell you a secret .... CAN! A simple torpedo ... We can from our territory, we can from the air from far away ....! And we can morally dig ...))) (which we are doing now ..)))) hi
  8. RUSS
    RUSS April 8 2016 10: 00
    +1
    If there was an aircraft carrier, there would be a war, or rather it would be unleashed.
  9. VP
    VP April 8 2016 10: 01
    +4
    The feeling that soon the entire Pentagon budget will go only to the content of what is.
    F-35 flight hour - throw 50 thousand bucks, and a raid was put in 200 hours on one plane with the claimed batch of 2,5 thousand
    Aircraft carrier with a group - 7 million per day.
    Base somewhere in the Baltic states - lay it out.
    The contingent in Afghanistan or Iraq - pay.
    Defile past the Chinese - drive the loot.
    Relocate some thread battalion to Europe - pay for infrastructure, for relocation, for higher salaries.
    Etc. etc. etc.
    1. SPACE59
      SPACE59 April 8 2016 10: 12
      +3
      Just have time to bring paper with paint to the machine))
    2. AdekvatNICK
      AdekvatNICK April 8 2016 10: 19
      +2
      they print, so no problem for them.
      1. SPACE59
        SPACE59 April 8 2016 10: 27
        +1
        it’s not clear where they got such crazy debts from?
      2. Kronos07
        Kronos07 April 8 2016 16: 47
        +1
        working people pay for it hi
    3. retardu
      retardu April 8 2016 15: 07
      0
      Where do you get these nonsense for 50k? In an Internet in the public domain, only the words of a general who spoke about 25 thousand.
  10. Historian
    Historian April 8 2016 10: 04
    +4
    We need a submarine to name Lee Harvey Oswald! .. :-)
    1. Shuttle
      Shuttle April 8 2016 10: 14
      0
      Quote: Historian
      We need a submarine to name Lee Harvey Oswald! .. :-)

      In general, it’s really strange. They slammed the president in their country in front of a crowd of people and could not find a real killer.
      But the airport should be named after him, and then the boat - that’s patriotism. It is now clear where the cult of death came from on the Maidan.
      1. Altona
        Altona April 8 2016 10: 50
        +2
        Quote: Shuttle
        In general, it’s really strange. They slammed the president in their country in front of a crowd of people and could not find a real killer.

        ------------------------
        And then Jack Rubinstein quite calmly slammed Lee Harvey Oswald himself and ends in the water, as they say. Died so dead. And Jack Ruby owned a nightclub, which means the mafia, then the mafia banged Kennedy. Just like in Ukraine, criminals became stronger than a powerful state armed to the teeth.
        1. sa-ag
          sa-ag April 8 2016 11: 13
          +1
          Quote: Altona
          And Jack Ruby owned a nightclub, which means the mafia, then the mafia banged Kennedy.

          For the mafia it’s very cool, besides Jack somehow intersected with the office of Rank Corporation, and this is not the mafia at all
          1. Altona
            Altona April 8 2016 14: 35
            0
            Quote: sa-ag
            For the mafia it’s very cool

            --------------------
            My comment is not serious. It is ridiculous that an ordinary Jew, Yakov Lvovich Rubinstein, so simply slammed the killer of the US President himself.
      2. Vetal999
        Vetal999 April 8 2016 12: 17
        +1
        They killed people on the Maidan and in Odessa and found? What is so strange here? Abuse of power. Scum she scum everywhere.
    2. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K April 8 2016 11: 34
      +2
      Quote: Historian
      We need a submarine to name Lee Harvey Oswald! .. :-)

      Several people shot at Kennedy, but the fact that Oswald shot was not proven. The real killers were never found.
  11. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 8 2016 10: 06
    0
    Again, the comparison begs, how much does it cost? Billion $ 12-15? What about 10 P-1000 missiles? Millions of $ 100 maximum? The question arises against which country can this aircraft carrier fight? Mozambique? Serbia? Somalia? That is, against those who do not have missiles capable of turning 15000000000 into a pile of metal lying at the bottom, I understand when there were no missiles, cruise missiles, especially supersonic missiles, aircraft carriers were a formidable force, and now?
    1. retardu
      retardu April 8 2016 15: 11
      +3
      Yeah, 10 missiles. Therefore, the USSR provided for the strike of 2 regiments of Tu22 under the guise of fighter aircraft. Do you really think that all such stupid people want to build aircraft carriers when you can build 10 missiles laughing
    2. Altona
      Altona April 8 2016 16: 31
      +1
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      Again, the comparison begs, how much does it cost? Billion $ 12-15? What about 10 P-1000 missiles? Millions of $ 100 maximum? The question arises against which country can this aircraft carrier fight? Mozambique? Serbia? Somalia?

      --------------------
      The budget of each of these countries is less than the cost of this aircraft carrier ...
  12. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 8 2016 10: 11
    -6
    The big and expensive ship turned out.
    A good target will be for our VKS ...
  13. drilled
    drilled April 8 2016 10: 15
    0
    Don't understand, is this new? They had John F Kennedy, his father photographed in the Atlantic in the 80s. Will there be two?
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet April 8 2016 10: 34
      +2
      Quote: Burieway
      Don't understand, is this new? They had John F. Kennedy,

      That was the first.
      On May 29, 2011, the US Department of Defense announced that the aircraft carrier John F. Kennedy (CVN 79) would be named after John F. Kennedy (1917-1963), the 35th president of the United States who served in the Navy during World War II war. The new aircraft carrier will be the third in the US Navy fleet, named after a member of the Kennedy family, and the second aircraft carrier, named after John F. Kennedy, replacing the USS aircraft carrier “John F. Kennedy” (CV-67), which served from 1967 to 2007 year. hi
      1. Bayonet
        Bayonet April 8 2016 11: 43
        +2
        Immediately minus? Well, it’s clear - the patriot cheers reflex! smile And in the mind, is there anything to argue with?
        1. drilled
          drilled April 8 2016 11: 51
          +2
          Quote: Bayonet
          Immediately minus? Well, it’s clear - the patriot cheers reflex! smile And in the mind, is there anything to argue with?

          If this is for me, then I wasn’t minus one. Do not be nervous.
          1. Bayonet
            Bayonet April 8 2016 13: 31
            +2
            Quote: Burieway
            If this is for me, then I wasn’t minus one. Do not be nervous.

            I didn’t mean you! hi Calm like a boa constrictor and I know who it is wink
            1. MIKHAN.
              MIKHAN. April 8 2016 13: 42
              -1
              Quote: Bayonet
              Quote: Burieway
              If this is for me, then I wasn’t minus one. Do not be nervous.

              I didn’t mean you! hi Calm like a boa constrictor and I know who it is wink

              I shot! For fun ..)))) laughing Here's how it hurts you .... Do you think yours took ..? (the partisans still remained ...)))
              1. Bayonet
                Bayonet April 8 2016 14: 11
                +1
                Quote: MIKHAN.
                I shot! For the sake of interest ..)))) This is how you are jarred ..

                And that Meehan, has long recovered, or is it in any way? laughing
    2. Kronos07
      Kronos07 April 8 2016 17: 01
      +2
      14 Million Feet of Electrical and Fiber Optic Cable Mounted by Gerald Ford (CVN 78)
  14. RUS-MAN
    RUS-MAN April 8 2016 10: 21
    +1
    That's what Facebook, McDonald's, tolerance and adult tinning with people do.
  15. vanavatny
    vanavatny April 8 2016 10: 23
    +1
    I still hope that in the event of a truly serious conflict, all these aircraft barges will be at the bases
    1. Foofighter
      Foofighter April 8 2016 10: 56
      -4
      Now everything is decided by space and aviation, and its submarines (as well as countermeasures from it) just do not carry.
    2. vanavatny
      vanavatny April 8 2016 12: 03
      +2
      ahhh, I understand it seems, that is, the whole project, ash, profanation and sawing, a submersible bucket with mine and torpedo rubbish and worthless rockets? And the invincible Amer’s aug is frightening only the will of God, so what? And 7 boats of this project ( 885 (0885) is in order for the Ort to have something to please us, and the modernization of the B-239 “Karp” and B-276 “Kostroma” (formerly K-276 “Crab”) of project 945 is like that - Norwegian seiners to sink
      1. Foofighter
        Foofighter April 8 2016 12: 20
        +1
        I realized that you with such a nick at the expense of non-aircraft barges were joking from the very beginning laughing bully

        why not build at least one aircraft carrier by 7 instead of selling it to India?
        1. vanavatny
          vanavatny April 8 2016 12: 30
          +3
          during the construction of the aug, the aircraft carrier itself is the last to be built, and I do not believe that if something happens, the Americans will risk checking the stability of their group in the confrontation with the aplos designed to destroy them. and where do you think such a collision can take place? It’s unlikely that off the coast of North America, that is, the Americans will fall under the influence of much more. And we will have an aircraft carrier this summer off the coast of Syria - you can train as much as you like, while the TARKs are modernized and new ships are designed ,
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Foofighter
            Foofighter April 8 2016 13: 03
            -2
            during the construction of the AUG AB goes in the center ... then the Americans will attack in the winter
            1. vanavatny
              vanavatny April 8 2016 13: 34
              0
              But did I talk about a marching warrant? I meant the order in which ships were built in shipyards
              1. Foofighter
                Foofighter April 8 2016 14: 42
                -1
                you wrote about anything just not about the matter, if so then AB should be started to build earlier because it takes longer to build, in addition, other types of ships are already there
                1. vanavatny
                  vanavatny April 8 2016 16: 10
                  0
                  I wrote about the dangers of apl for the aircraft carriers, and the latter, precisely because the very other ships we have, is also only in the project (except for takr, one of which is for modernization, and the next one) the technical condition and modern equipment of the others will be unknown by the time the aircraft carrier is completed, or we’ll be collecting from all fleets what is available to create a full-fledged grouping
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. Foofighter
                    Foofighter April 8 2016 16: 20
                    -1
                    you wrote incorrectly ... and about this too.
  16. Taygerus
    Taygerus April 8 2016 10: 27
    -5
    another barge for scaring Papuans laughing
  17. urik62
    urik62 April 8 2016 10: 31
    0
    Quote: VP
    The feeling that soon the entire Pentagon budget will go only to the content of what is.
    F-35 flight hour - throw 50 thousand bucks, and a raid was put in 200 hours on one plane with the claimed batch of 2,5 thousand
    Aircraft carrier with a group - 7 million per day.
    Base somewhere in the Baltic states - lay it out.
    The contingent in Afghanistan or Iraq - pay.
    Defile past the Chinese - drive the loot.
    Relocate some thread battalion to Europe - pay for infrastructure, for relocation, for higher salaries.
    Etc. etc. etc.

    What is the budget ??? Print as needed!
    1. ametist415
      ametist415 April 8 2016 11: 12
      0
      The main thing is that there should be personnel, people who know how to make an ocean multi-purpose fleet.
      "Cadres decide everything" I.V. Stalin. "I decided in frames - and that's it ..." (Pi ... ts)
    2. Kronos07
      Kronos07 April 8 2016 17: 03
      0
      What is the budget?
  18. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 April 8 2016 10: 39
    -4
    Pentagon: Launch of aircraft carrier John F. Kennedy is scheduled for 2020 g

    Russian Aerospace Forces: launch under the aircraft carrier John F. Kennedy is scheduled for 2020
    1. Prager
      Prager April 8 2016 11: 00
      0
      it would be just great to let it UNDER water!
  19. Vetal999
    Vetal999 April 8 2016 10: 43
    -5
    “If you want to ruin a small country, give it a cruiser…” Winston CHURCHILL.
    They think that their economy will not sink until 2020, optimists.
  20. MIKHAN.
    MIKHAN. April 8 2016 11: 09
    -3
    Their AUG is no longer close to the shores of Syria .. They are afraid! (Remember that it was 3 years ago ..))) And in the 90s there was general chaos ...! If that is an excellent target for our supersonic ... (I am silent about the nuclear submarine at all ..)))) Am I right "comrades from Israel" put it? You do have the opportunity to buy one, but you know that a good target will be ..))) wink
  21. Engineer
    Engineer April 8 2016 11: 11
    +4
    Nothing ... the construction of a large dry dock should begin at the Severnaya Verf this year ... yes, yes, for the construction of aircraft carriers. To be a Russian aircraft carrier.
    1. MIKHAN.
      MIKHAN. April 8 2016 11: 30
      +1
      Quote: Engineer
      Nothing ... the construction of a large dry dock should begin at the Severnaya Verf this year ... yes, yes, for the construction of aircraft carriers. To be a Russian aircraft carrier.

      We will definitely build it ... But for now, Missiles, nuclear submarines, fighter jets and, most importantly, our air defense (throughout the country and not only) And everything will be fine!
  22. Kibl
    Kibl April 8 2016 11: 35
    0
    A large ship is good! A convenient target, a large torpedo or a large ship, a rocket, a matter of taste!
  23. The comment was deleted.
    1. MIKHAN.
      MIKHAN. April 8 2016 12: 31
      -2
      Quote: Vetal999
      Some pease de nyshes here we are stamped with cons.

      There is such a thing for a long time ... Now they will begin to ban! bully This is called website optimization ..! bully
  24. kamski
    kamski April 8 2016 13: 00
    +3
    The United States will print as many dollars as necessary, then they will buy resources on these pieces of paper all over the world, build what they need, pay their salaries, replenish their gold and foreign exchange reserves, etc.
  25. kirpich
    kirpich April 8 2016 13: 17
    -4
    Quote: Алексей_К
    It is only in peacetime that they are allowed to go to a certain distance, and during military operations they will be shot down without warning.


    It is only in peacetime that our airplanes denote attacks. During the fighting they will drown without warning!
    ZY One DRYING "DONE" the corvette so that a third of the crew requested a call to the nearest friendly port and canceled the contract. Do you have doubts? Google to the rescue.
    1. MIKHAN.
      MIKHAN. April 8 2016 13: 50
      -1
      Quote: kirpich
      Quote: Алексей_К
      It is only in peacetime that they are allowed to go to a certain distance, and during military operations they will be shot down without warning.


      It is only in peacetime that our airplanes denote attacks. During the fighting they will drown without warning!
      ZY One DRYING "DONE" the corvette so that a third of the crew requested a call to the nearest friendly port and canceled the contract. Do you have doubts? Google to the rescue.

      I put you a plus, but now the gang will run over ... And you will get bored, the rules of conduct on the site! In general, we won’t heat with dryers (if we finish it off only ...))) We will wet from the heart EVERYWHERE!
  26. AID.S
    AID.S April 8 2016 14: 08
    +2
    Since the Americans in the aircraft carriers ate the dog and bake them like pies, we, by virtue of our circumstances, only have to do what to prepare asymmetric answers in the foreseeable future. Well, or hats that are always ready.