Military Review

Belarusian Defense Ministry to get the fourth C-300 division

36
In the near future, the next division of the C-300 air defense system will go into service with the Belarusian army, TASS message of the Commander of the Air Force and Air Defense of the Armed Forces of Belarus Oleg Dvigalev.


Belarusian Defense Ministry to get the fourth C-300 division


“At present, the delivery of four C-300 anti-aircraft missile battalions from the Russian Federation is being completed, they will be part of the interregional air defense system. Three divisions are already on the territory of the Republic of Belarus, the fourth is on the way ”,
said the major general.

Also, “the contract for the purchase of combat-training aircraft Yak-130 is being implemented - the first four (link) has already been put into service and mastered by Belarusian pilots,” he noted.

“By the end of the year, we are expecting another four of these aircraft to the Air Force of Belarus. In addition, contracts for the purchase of radar stations for radio engineering troops in the Russian Federation are practically implemented, ”said Dvigalev.

"We are actively developing cooperation in the field of operational training, we also, together with Russia, continue to improve the unified regional air defense system," he added
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of Belarus
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov April 7 2016 11: 33
    +2
    Yes, it is necessary to close the Western direction tightly, from Belarus it is easier to control the airspace of Poland and the Baltic states, and even svidomye nearby.
    1. Pravdarm
      Pravdarm April 7 2016 11: 42
      +13
      Weapons are accepted with pleasure (S-300). But Lukashenko does not want to let Rosaviabazu (so that our VKS are there). Unpleasant. Yulit.
      1. vkl.47
        vkl.47 April 7 2016 11: 47
        +1
        "Dad" is that beetle. With everyone wants to drive friendship. Both ours and yours. Slippery type
        1. Communist 1
          Communist 1 April 7 2016 12: 21
          -2
          You will figure it out in politics first, and then make judgments.
        2. Prager
          Prager April 7 2016 16: 50
          0
          I completely agree with you to the last of your words.
      2. jjj
        jjj April 7 2016 11: 48
        +2
        And, note, they transmit C-300, not C-400, although the location would seem to be a trump card
        1. Lt. Air Force stock
          Lt. Air Force stock April 7 2016 11: 55
          0
          Quote: jjj
          C-400

          S-400 could control the entire airspace over Belarus. Placed in the center and order (800 kilometers diameter of the covered zone).
          1. alexmach
            alexmach April 7 2016 22: 03
            +1
            S-400 could control the entire airspace over Belarus. Placed in the center and order (800 kilometers diameter of the covered zone).


            Yeah .. at an altitude of how many kilometers?
        2. MARGO
          MARGO April 7 2016 11: 57
          +2
          Old Man "begged" for free all the same ...
          1. gur4enk
            gur4enk April 7 2016 18: 51
            0
            I read comments on an article on joint exercises, well done people write there, waved something in front of Poland, brotherhood, friendship, chewing gum, mutual assistance. I read the comments on this article - beg, freebie, begged, gave away the old stuff, etc. Gentlemen, decide already!
        3. Bongo
          Bongo April 7 2016 13: 25
          +4
          Quote: jjj
          And, note, they transmit C-300, not C-400, although the location would seem to be a trump card

          C-300PS built in the middle of the 80's transmit, the production of missiles for these systems ceased about 20 years ago. Transferring newer systems under the control of Belarus with the unpredictability of the leadership there is the height of shortsightedness.
        4. gergi
          gergi April 7 2016 13: 46
          +3
          Transmit, not sell. Favorite word father give! And give father’s Kremlin a present. He has been dreaming about him for a long time. And we’ll give him the whole fleet and aviation. I think he will not refuse. Before the Russian air base in Belarus, the American base would be more likely. Golem freeloader. Collective farm, he and the collective farm in Africa. And the collective farm thoughts, like a neighboring collective farm, beg for manure.
      3. Altona
        Altona April 7 2016 11: 57
        +5
        Quote: Pravdarm
        Weapons are accepted with pleasure (S-300). But Lukashenko does not want to let Rosaviabazu (so that our VKS are there). Unpleasant. Yulit.

        ----------------------
        Somewhere I recently read an article that the military doctrine of Belarus does not provide for military action on the side of other states. That is, our union state with Belarus is a fiction. Our guys will defend Belarus, and when they attack Russia, Belarus will not intervene. It's a shame, I myself served there in air defense in Minsk and my grandfather died near Mogilev in July 1944.
        1. Belarus
          Belarus April 7 2016 12: 04
          +1
          All right, you say.The troops of the Republic of Belarus will never participate in hostilities abroad and this is fixed at the legislative level and declared by the president himself.
          So yes, then I myself do not understand why we need membership in the CSTO? request
          1. Lt. Air Force stock
            Lt. Air Force stock April 7 2016 12: 18
            +2
            Quote: Belarus
            So yes, then I myself do not understand why we need membership in the CSTO?

            Lukashenko once stated that if NATO attacks Belarus, then Russia will come to the rescue. Perhaps Belarus needs this treaty to make the country more serious in Europe.
          2. 33 Watcher
            33 Watcher April 7 2016 14: 11
            +3
            Quote: Belarus
            All right, you say.The troops of the Republic of Belarus will never participate in hostilities abroad and this is fixed at the legislative level and declared by the president himself.
            So yes, then I myself do not understand why we need membership in the CSTO? request

            request Maybe, what, do not pay for weapons? wink laughing
          3. alexmach
            alexmach April 7 2016 22: 07
            +1
            So yes, then I myself do not understand why we need membership in the CSTO?


            Well, why, how many years did the "last dictator of Europe" hold out thanks to the Russian roof? And now it suddenly turned out that the roof did not seem to be needed. It is possible to overstep into the camp of the enemy.
        2. 33 Watcher
          33 Watcher April 7 2016 14: 15
          +3
          "Somewhere I recently read an article that the military doctrine of Belarus does not provide for"

          Yes Yes..! Damn, does not provide ... laughing Both legislatively and in the doctrine is written down. Soon on all the fences of Belarus laughing
          Abroad neither, nor. I also thought earlier that allied relations, they are, as it were ... Mutual! In! But no, here for you, not here, the "Belarusian Nipple" system ... laughing
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. siberalt
        siberalt April 7 2016 12: 04
        0
        It’s even a little pity that in Belarus there is no sea with a peninsula. laughing
        Somehow it’s more reliable.
      6. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris April 7 2016 12: 06
        +1
        In the Smolensk region, the furniture maker was completely disarmed .. There is no tactical aviation or air defense (with the exception of the base of the air defense academy of the ground forces, missiles with tactical nuclear weapons disappeared earlier. If Luka continues to bustle, then everything needs to be placed in Smolensk region. with pleasure because it is FREE.
        Quote: Pravdarm
        Weapons are accepted with pleasure (S-300). But Lukashenko does not want to let Rosaviabazu (so that our VKS are there). Unpleasant. Yulit.
        1. Communist 1
          Communist 1 April 7 2016 12: 24
          -1
          Another great strategist with ... brains!
      7. Communist 1
        Communist 1 April 7 2016 12: 19
        -5
        Rosaviabaza is not accepted because Lukashenko offers to use Belarusian pilots. What does not suit you?
        1. Cartalon
          Cartalon April 7 2016 12: 50
          +6
          It does not suit that in the event of a conflict between the Russian Federation and NATO in the Baltic states, Belarusian pilots will observe the strictest neutrality, and they will need to be equipped with at least SU-35
        2. LastLap
          LastLap April 7 2016 16: 16
          0
          Wonderful! Using Belarusian pilots on what? How Bo requires air transport under them with all the ensuing and flowing. 130 great, but nevertheless ....
    2. Talgat
      Talgat April 8 2016 22: 46
      0
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      it is necessary to close the Western direction tightly, from Belarus it is easier to control the airspace of Poland and the Baltic states, and even svidomye nearby.


      Everything is done right!

      Belarus is at the forefront of the main probable strike - right on the border with all the "foes"
      There, it is necessary to strengthen air defense in the first place, and aviation (to set the base unambiguously) and ground forces to be. C-300 which are replaced by c-400 in Russia probably makes sense to relocate to Belarus. At the airbase there to keep Su-30 and interceptors Mig-31

      At the same time, I think everyone will agree, you should not put the most modern - like C-500 or c-400 - or to base PAK FA - too close to the border - too vulnerable

      We don’t need to strengthen much here - with China, it seems like it’s normal now - but we don’t see others against whom you need to keep C-400 and Su-35 here - you can save
  2. vglazunov
    vglazunov April 7 2016 11: 34
    +2
    Belarusians are not Ukrainians and azerbaots, they will not betray. We need to help them strengthen the defense.
    1. MARGO
      MARGO April 7 2016 12: 38
      +2
      Quote: vglazunov
      Belarusians are not Ukrainians and azerbaots, they will not betray. We need to help them strengthen the defense.

      And why .. ??? We ourselves at any frontiers, we can protect ourselves and our interests! Pay for loyalty ...? Enough..!
    2. Winnie76
      Winnie76 April 7 2016 12: 39
      +4
      Where such confidence? Share it. Because like brotherly people? Maybe enough rake dancing?
      1. MARGO
        MARGO April 7 2016 13: 13
        +4
        Quote: Winnie76
        Where such confidence? Share it. Because like brotherly people? Maybe enough rake dancing?

        There are no more brothers ....! It is time to understand this already ... (the brothers have already betrayed us 10 times, and some even declared war ..))) During the time of tsarist Russia, everyone understood and acted accordingly ..! hi
        1. LastLap
          LastLap April 7 2016 16: 20
          +1
          Hmmm, those brothers too. With such a family, strangers are not needed.
    3. gergi
      gergi April 7 2016 13: 50
      +2
      There are no questions for Belarusians, brothers. Doubts about their father, they don’t like double-dealing.
    4. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris April 7 2016 15: 05
      +1
      There is no complete certainty here. Lukashenko will not lead his country to a slaughter .. It’s in Sochi that they are bosom friends, that vacationers, that local people don’t get through, don’t drive .. It’s unlikely they will fulfill allied obligations, knowing that they will be the first to be distributed ..
      Quote: vglazunov
      Belarusians are not Ukrainians and azerbaots, they will not betray. We need to help them strengthen the defense.
  3. xam0
    xam0 April 7 2016 11: 35
    +4
    Strengthening the borders of fraternal Belarus is strengthening the borders of Russia.
  4. samoletil18
    samoletil18 April 7 2016 11: 40
    +6
    I'm not sure if I'm on the subject, but I remembered the episode of the 90s with the sale of the S-300 to the Americans by the Belarusians. And now the sediment remaining does not warm the soul: no matter how bam the course for "multi-vector" is not taken.
    Nevertheless, I hope that this news is only about strengthening the defense capability of the Union State.
    1. Belarus
      Belarus April 7 2016 11: 58
      +3
      That’s why there’s essentially no discussion about the S-400 with our country. And then, yes, the S-300 was averted to the Amers, however, it’s really training, but still it was not pleasant to agree.
    2. alexmach
      alexmach April 7 2016 22: 18
      +1
      And now the sediment remaining does not warm the soul: no matter how bam the course for "multi-vector" is not taken.


      You see, the fact is that in a small country without this multi-vector approach, there is no way. Is this the only way to pursue any independent policy?
  5. Masya masya
    Masya masya April 7 2016 11: 43
    +3
    Something did not announce the amount ... Again fraternal help?
  6. RUS-MAN
    RUS-MAN April 7 2016 11: 46
    +2
    Listen, guys, is it even possible to even think about sometime the reunion of at least these two eternal fraternal East Slavic peoples?
    1. Belarus
      Belarus April 7 2016 11: 56
      +2
      Oh, I would also like to believe in it. But I grew up already from childhood and do not believe in fairy tales. In the short term, this certainly will not happen unfortunately due to many disagreements on many issues.
      1. samoletil18
        samoletil18 April 7 2016 12: 27
        +1
        Again the 90s remembered. Then the media drove this topic cool. It was all in one duduk: we do not like Yeltsin, and Lukashenko has authority in Russia, as he reunited, so Lukashenko will reign in Moscow in a week. Then it was still possible, now we will not unite. And with time, long, maybe. But only on an economic basis. Who wants to lose power from rulers?
    2. Communist 1
      Communist 1 April 7 2016 12: 22
      -3
      It is possible when Russia breaks out of external control.
    3. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris April 7 2016 15: 08
      +2
      As long as thieves and oligarchs rule in Russia, there will be no reunion.
      Quote: RUS-MAN
      Listen, guys, is it even possible to even think about sometime the reunion of at least these two eternal fraternal East Slavic peoples?
  7. Victor jnnjdfy
    Victor jnnjdfy April 7 2016 12: 30
    +7
    Quote: vkl.47
    "Dad" is that beetle. With everyone wants to drive friendship. Both ours and yours. Slippery type

    Friendship implies disinterestedness, and friendship is when, honestly, "you tell me, I tell you." There is neither the first nor the second between the Russian Federation and Belarus. Stop using the term "fraternal peoples".

    The people of Russia need to equip Russia and restore order in it (starting with garbage collection). First of all, observe your interests, taking into account the interests of neighboring countries and neighboring peoples, if possible. Russia will be a powerful country with a fair system of governance and high welfare of the population — neighbors will be drawn to it themselves, without persuasion.

    While "statists" like Zhirinovsky are broadcasting on our TV screens and runaway Soviet Jews are claiming the place of national ideologists, and state power is being formed according to the feudal-mafia principle, one should not expect anything good from our neighbors regarding Russia.