Military Review

About the proximity of the collapse of Saudi Arabia (part 2)

44
About the proximity of the collapse of Saudi Arabia (part 2)

The alliance between the United States and Saudi Arabia was mutually beneficial before the start of the 2010s. Saudi Arabia, like Turkey, became the tools of London and Washington to destabilize a huge region - from North Africa to Iran. A new mutation of radical, “black” Islam - “Caliphate” was created. At the same time, the countries of the NATO bloc, the USA, the Arab monarchies and Turkey demolished a number of countries that maintained the left-nationalist ideology and maintained stability in a vast region. This is primarily Iraq, Libya and Syria. On the verge of collapse, 85 million Egypt has been and remains, the demolition of which will cause a huge wave that will finally “drown” the Middle East in chaos.


The main reason why the masters of the West began the chaos and defragmentation of the countries of the Middle East (and in the whole of Eurasia) is a global systemic crisis. The “Matryoshka Crisis”, which includes the biosphere-ecological crisis, the crisis of capitalism and Western civilization, the crisis of man himself (his involution, degradation), the crisis of the white race, the crisis of biblical culture (Christianity and Islam). As a result, the global financial and economic crisis is only the tip of the iceberg.

The masters of the West see the problem and solve it in the usual way. They unleashed a world war in order to “reload the matrix,” that is, to destroy the former world and create on its fragments the so-called The new world order is a non-slave civilization with castes of gentlemen and "two-legged tools." The war allows to solve the main tasks: to destroy or extremely weaken competitors, having received their resources at full disposal; move to a new way of life; create a new global religion - ecumenism, which will replace the old projects; to utilize most of the biomass, and dramatically reduce the level of consumption of the remaining humanity, except for the caste of the “elect”, which will solve the problems of ecology and restoration of the biosphere; create a sustainable system, since the rest of humanity will be so lowered that it simply will not be able to resist the “gods” that own the most advanced technologies, etc.

The main blow is delivered to the states of Eurasia. The British Isles, the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand are the “islands of security”, the core of the future new order. In the role of "collective Hitler" appears radical, "black" Islam. This mutation of Islam created the Anglo-Saxon, Saudi and Turkish secret services. Its basis is jihadism and Wahhabism, which oppose not only “infidels”, but also traditional Islam. "Caliphate" acted as a ram for demolishing the old states and led to the creation of the Middle East Front of the Fourth World War. Major hostilities are currently under way in Syria and Iraq. Another bridgehead of the “Caliphate” is Libya. However, the metastasis of this tumor has already spread from Central Africa and the Middle East to Europe, Central Asia and Indonesia. The latest large-scale terrorist acts in France and Belgium are a sign of the approach of activation of the so-called. hybrid, irregular war on the territory of European states. Europe is completely unprepared for such a war. In 2015, the “Caliphate” began minting gold dinar and silver dirham, that is, challenged the “petrodollar” system.

The fourth world war (the third was the so-called cold war between the USSR and the West, it ended in defeat and the collapse of the Soviet civilization) - this is a war of civilizations. The masters of the West caused a clash between the North and the South, the western (post-Christian) -Islamic civilization. Also in the confrontation with the "black" Islam Russian civilization is involved. Next up are Indian and Chinese civilizations. In particular, the conflict between India and Pakistan, which was previously created by the Anglo-Saxons, can be intensified at any time. The current conflict between Christian Armenia and Muslim Azerbaijan also has the character of this civilizational fault. According to the architects of the New World Order, the civilizational war should end with the mutual destruction, the almost complete destruction of the old Europe, the Russian and Islamic civilizations, the collapse and the extreme weakening of the Indian and Chinese civilizations. That is, Eurasia is becoming the battlefield of civilizations and will suffer major losses.

Saudi Arabia (plus other monarchies) and Turkey in this scenario acted as figures in the Big Game. London and Washington used them as skirmishers who set fire to a huge region. Their large resources, including the religious sphere, finances, and possibilities of informational influence, were used to destroy previously relatively stable states. They were beaten on key points, pillars that kept a huge region in balance: Iraq - Saddam Hussein, Libya - Gaddafi, Egypt - Mubarak, Syria - Assad. Egypt was saved literally at the last moment, when Riyadh realized that its collapse would lead to chaos in the Saudi kingdom.

Saudi Arabia and Turkey solved the problem of strengthening their positions in the region and gladly crushed competitors. In addition, they were promised a "carrot" - Saudi Arabia and Qatar were hoping to lead the project "Caliphate", to unite the Sunni world and to destroy the Shiite Iran. The Turkish leadership, embarking on the path of Islamization of the state, tried to push its project “Caliphate” - “Ottoman Empire - 2” into the future, claiming leadership not only in the Islamic, but also in the Turkic world.

However, having supported the United States and other Western countries in dismembering Iraq, Libya and Syria, as well as fomenting a big war in the region, the Arab monarchies themselves put themselves at risk. The funnel of chaos, having swallowed up the first blows of the state, began to absorb new territories. The war came to Turkey and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are bogged down in the war in Syria and Yemen, the Turks in Iraq and Syria. At the same time in Turkey there was a threat of civil war - the Kurdish problem. There was a threat that the Arab monarchies, Turkey and Egypt, supported by the Saudis, would also be destroyed, dismembered.

In Riyadh, apparently, they realized that they themselves were under attack. First, the United States withdrew its main forces from Iraq and Afghanistan, sharply reducing its military presence in the region. In 2013-2014 Obama refused to send American Aviation for the bombing of Syria, on which Riyadh insisted. Also, Americans did not supply some types weapons Syrian "moderate" gangs. Then anti-Iranian rhetoric abruptly subsided. Although before that, the United States and Israel had actually threatened Tehran with war, which was in the interests of Saudi Arabia. Things reached the point that sanctions were lifted from Iran (partially), financial assets were unfrozen. An agreement has been reached on the Iranian nuclear program. Iran got the opportunity to start supplying black gold. It became obvious that Obama was playing the Iranian card as opposed to Saudi Arabia. In addition, in the conditions of the Middle East conflict, the United States relied on the Kurds in Iraq and Syria. That is, continued the course to defragment the region.

For Saudis, the withdrawal of the main US forces from the region and a decrease in US dependence on energy supply (shale boom), as well as the expansion of the conflict zone around the perimeter of the Kingdom, which inevitably leads to the spread of war to Saudi Arabia, as well as the course towards rapprochement with Iran are unacceptable. An objective basis has emerged for a rift in relations between Saudi Arabia and the United States. Washington is creating two new footholds in the region - the Kurdish state and Iran. Tehran has already lost its former revolutionary fervor. Part of the Iranian elite and middle class are ready for mutually beneficial cooperation with the West, which has already led to large contracts with Western companies. Saudi Arabia has lost the status of "beloved wife."

All this has led to the emergence of enormous problems for Saudi Arabia, which has lost the power of the "roof" of the United States and is facing a threat from the strengthening of its position in the region of Iran, as well as the unrecognized "Caliphate". At the same time, Riyadh will be involved in the wars in Iraq, Syria and Yemen. Hushits and jihadists may well begin fighting in the territory of Saudi Arabia itself. The fall in the price of black gold has dealt a blow to the mono-economy of Saudi Arabia.

Not surprisingly, the sheikhs became nervous and took a number of steps to strengthen their position. So, the Saudis pulled Egypt out of the pit, providing it with financial resources and supporting the military elite. "Muslim Brotherhood" driven underground. As a result, Egypt has become a kind of power tool in the hands of Riyadh. Egypt was provided with resources to purchase a number of modern weapons, including in Russia. True, the underlying socio-economic problems, as well as the long-term water problem and demographic problems have not been resolved and this is only a delay. Egypt will still face these problems and its collapse is quite possible.

Then Riyadh began to flirt with Moscow. There were rumors about possible financial investments in the Russian Federation, the signing of large-scale military contracts. The Saudis have unleashed the "oil war", trying to undermine the capabilities of competitors and seize their market share, including American shale companies. However, the tool that the kingdom used for the purpose of destroying competitors over the past three years — a simple increase in oil production — turned out to be not as effective as planned. Although American shalers began to pour in, Saudi Arabia itself was in a difficult position. The budget has formed a hole and foreign exchange reserves are rapidly depleted.

Attempts to diversify the economy continue. Riyadh has announced the creation of the world's largest national wealth fund in 2 with over a trillion dollars. Future cancellation of the Saudi rial peg to the US dollar has also been announced. This will allow KSA to arrange a new wave of dumping in world markets - to strike at US competitors and shalers. True, this measure may lead to a large-scale capital outflow and a sharp rise in inflation in Saudi Arabia.

In addition, Saudi Arabia hastily put together its own power unit. In 2015, Riyadh formed its own anti-terrorist coalition from 34 Islamic countries. Now the Saudis are planning to create another military organization, but in the image and pattern of NATO. Officially, the "Muslim NATO" must fight with world terrorism (under this pretext almost any wars now begin). In reality, Riyadh wants to be able to fight the main enemy - Iran. It is possible that the “Muslim NATO” will be created on the basis of the already existing anti-terrorist coalition of Islamic states. The leading military powers in this coalition are Pakistan and Egypt.

Tehran and Riyadh are already fighting, but the struggle is still on foreign territory - Iraq, Syria and Yemen. For example, in Yemen, the Arab coalition, created and headed by the Saudis, has been waging a war against the Hussites supported by Tehran for a year. In Syria, Tehran supports Damascus, and Riyadh supports gangs of various kinds, fighting against the legitimate government. Moreover, if the Iranians did not support Damascus economically, as well as direct military force, the regime of Bashar al-Assad would have fallen.

Thus, it is obvious that Saudi Arabia (like Turkey) has become a victim of its own policies in the region. The Saudis helped the US to create confusion in the Middle East, but now they themselves are dragging themselves into a funnel of chaos.
Author:
Articles from this series:
About the proximity of the collapse of Saudi Arabia
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy April 7 2016 06: 18
    +15
    We welcome the collapse of Saudi constituents.
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 April 7 2016 06: 32
      +2
      Mavrikiy RU Today, 06:18 AM New
      We welcome the collapse of Saudi constituents.

      I am for" !
      1. ver_
        ver_ April 7 2016 09: 46
        +1
        ... I really do not want to go down into the depths of time - the minuses will fall off like a cornucopia .., however, the planting of the cult of Christ by the Semites led to the split of the ancient faith with many Gods to ersatz - for Christ is not God, but the son of God, like the whole male sex .. And they got a split .. Islam, which began to divide ... As a result, they got what they got - a bunch of sects, religions and a lot of trouble of all stripes ... Well, than Zeus, Apollo .., Perun prevented this God-chosen people ..
        1. 0255
          0255 April 7 2016 09: 53
          +3
          Quote: ver_
          ... I really do not want to go down into the depths of time - the minuses will fall off like a cornucopia .., however, the planting of the cult of Christ by the Semites led to the split of the ancient faith with many Gods to ersatz - for Christ is not God, but the son of God, like the whole male sex .. And they got a split .. Islam, which began to divide ... As a result, they got what they got - a bunch of sects, religions and a lot of trouble of all stripes ... Well, than Zeus, Apollo .., Perun prevented this God-chosen people ..

          Offer us to go to the temple to atone for sins before Perun and Dazhbog? laughing
          1. sergo42
            sergo42 April 7 2016 15: 32
            -2
            And why are they worse?
            1. Weyland
              Weyland April 7 2016 23: 21
              0
              Quote: sergo42
              And why are they worse?


              Are you with these cults enough are you familiar?
        2. Stirbjorn
          Stirbjorn April 7 2016 11: 12
          +5
          Quote: ver_
          however, the planting of the cult of Christ by the Semites led to a split of the ancient faith with many Gods to ersatz - for Christ is not God, but the son of God, like the entire male sex .. And they got a split ..

          Comrade, there’s a topic about Saudi Arabia - are they Muslims in general, what is the cult of Christ ?! Just to get in with his dolbloslaviyu
      2. 0255
        0255 April 7 2016 09: 55
        +2
        Quote: aszzz888
        Mavrikiy RU Today, 06:18 AM New
        We welcome the collapse of Saudi constituents.

        I am for" !

        The collapse of what we just did not promise - Ukraine, Turkey, Israel, the United States with their dollar system ... Where are all these collapses?
    2. sherp2015
      sherp2015 April 7 2016 10: 05
      +1
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      We welcome the collapse of Saudi constituents.


      They set fire to this snake-holder in the Middle East, well, now where the wind will drive the fire ...
      1. Basarev
        Basarev April 7 2016 10: 32
        -5
        Rather, Russia will fall apart than Arabia. If only because in Arabia heads are cut for embezzlement, and we are awarded.
        1. Weyland
          Weyland April 7 2016 23: 29
          0
          Quote: Basarev
          in Arabia cut heads for embezzlement


          The question is whose of property the treasury itself - the state or the royal family!
        2. Weyland
          Weyland April 7 2016 23: 30
          0
          Quote: Basarev
          in Arabia cut heads for embezzlement


          The question is whose of property the treasury itself - the state or the royal family!
          1. Basarev
            Basarev April 8 2016 05: 54
            +2
            And yet in Arabia, with equal dependence on oil and equal population density (plus desert conditions, nothing is softer than the tundra), the standard of living is an order of magnitude higher than ours. A well-fed and rich, even an Arab, is unlikely to trample against the authorities who gave him this wealth. While we easily close hospitals in small towns to save the pants of another stealing money bag. And for the treatment of cancer patients collected messages. This is because in Arabia, competent domestic politics and the treasury owned by the royal family does not change anything: anyone is punished for embezzlement from the treasury, even the king will be easily bled. There are no untouchables in Arabia - that’s the point!
            Well, in Russia we don’t come to power to make the country better — they go to power to steal and mock those who are not in power.
            1. ramzes1776
              ramzes1776 April 8 2016 07: 52
              0
              There will be no oil production in Saudi Arabia; there will be no Saudi itself. They only live thanks to it. It is worth just sending ISIS to their territory !!!
              1. Basarev
                Basarev April 8 2016 09: 26
                0
                Is it not so in Russia? As soon as the price began to return to its natural values, all of an economic miracle suddenly rained down.
            2. Cat man null
              Cat man null April 8 2016 09: 33
              +1
              Quote: Basarev
              for theft from the treasury equally punish anyone, even it’s quite easy for the king to bleed

              - Oh really? Saudi - an absolute monarchy yet, do not forget laughing

              Quote: Basarev
              living standards are much higher than ours

              - I will disappoint you .. to the impossibility: this applies only to the indigenous population .. migrants and their descendants it does not affect
              - in Saudi, with its nearly 30 million people - about 10 million migrants .. this is so, by the way ..

              Quote: Basarev
              There are no untouchables in Arabia - that’s the point!

              - someone deceived you ..

              Somehow laughing
              1. Basarev
                Basarev April 8 2016 11: 49
                +1
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                I will disappoint you .. to the impossibility: this applies only to the indigenous population .. migrants and their descendants it does not affect

                And why in general in a normal state should migrants be on an equal footing with the indigenous?
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 7 2016 06: 31
    +1
    At the same time, a threat of civil war arose in Turkey - the Kurdish problem.

    And it could very well be a military coup. Then, the main Basurman, and they will sink into the Black Sea! fellow
  3. Ayujak
    Ayujak April 7 2016 06: 34
    +2
    All the efforts of the Saudis to create a modern army and a coalition led by them are simply not worth a penny. Everyone already knows what's going on in Yemen. What can I say that they can oppose themselves to the United States? With Iran, it can and will turn out to butt, and then if the same US helps, and so the result will be deplorable. Everything is simple - the Saudi army - a soap bubble. A pair of missiles (non-nuclear) in Riyadh (in the palace) and all. There is no top — there is no army.

    In economic terms, the United States is not profitable to remove such a fat dairy cow for slaughter. There are no allies in this region except Israel. Significant that can help in the war with Iran.
  4. crasever
    crasever April 7 2016 07: 20
    +1
    These obese descendants of the warlike Bedouins allowed the armed infidels from America to trample the sacred land of Mecca and Medina. Break up - will be right!
  5. shinobi
    shinobi April 7 2016 07: 40
    -6
    Nothing, but the USSR formula lost in the Cold War, enrages us. We didn’t take pains, we began to solve our internal problems. We got rid of leeches. This was extremely dislike for leeches, now they scream loudest.
    1. hartlend
      hartlend April 7 2016 09: 40
      +4
      We did not lose, the USSR was destroyed by the Anglo-Saxons. The remnants of the Union were completely dependent on them. They wrote us a constitution, even the colors of their flag. When Putin was able to start taking small steps to get out of this addiction, then everyone got up against Russia.
      1. 0255
        0255 April 7 2016 09: 51
        +5
        Quote: hartlend
        We did not lose, the USSR was destroyed by the Anglo-Saxons.

        The USSR was destroyed by the Communists themselves, who sold themselves to the West. I think that Gorbachev, EBN, Gaidar, Chubais had a choice - to serve their country or sell it with giblets. Chose the second option am I wonder why in the USA the same traitors do not get to power?
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh April 7 2016 15: 38
          +4
          "I wonder why in the USA the same traitors do not get to power?" ////

          Indeed? Presidents regularly change: now and then,
          senators, ministers, clowns - leapfrog ... - but there are no traitors (and conspiracies).
          The question is worth its weight in gold.
          1. gray smeet
            gray smeet April 7 2016 16: 35
            0
            Quote: voyaka uh

            Indeed? Presidents regularly change: now and then,
            senators, ministers, clowns - leapfrog ... - but there are no traitors (and conspiracies).
            The question is worth its weight in gold.


            Key (!):
            The question is worth its weight in gold.

            I applaud while standing! good
            1. Basarev
              Basarev April 8 2016 06: 09
              -2
              That's because in the USA it’s not like ours - in the USA the law is binding. There is no such thing that anyone who is called upon to enforce the law himself violates it. Plus, a real civil society - when ordinary people can easily throw off the crown from a arrogant official of any rank. More real elections and real change of power. Not like ours, where the story of 146% was released on the brakes. Finally, the constitutional right to own weapons. Not really betraying a country full of armed citizens who know their rights and know how to defend them ...
  6. 72jora72
    72jora72 April 7 2016 09: 08
    -1
    It is possible that “Muslim NATO” will be created on the basis of the already existing anti-terrorist coalition of Islamic states. The leading military powers in this coalition are Pakistan and Egypt.
    Pakistan, on the contrary, emphasizes in every way that it will not enter into any alliances with the Saudis, much less send its troops somewhere.
    In particular, Pakistani Foreign Minister Aizaz Chowdry said that he learned from newspapers about this new coalition and its affiliation. According to him, he even called the ambassador to Saudi Arabia to clarify the situation. It is reported that joining the coalition was not discussed with the Pakistani authorities.
  7. Burmistr
    Burmistr April 7 2016 09: 12
    0
    dog - dog death
  8. hammer stalker
    hammer stalker April 7 2016 09: 18
    -1
    Do not dig a hole to another.
  9. Achilles
    Achilles April 7 2016 09: 40
    +1

    as well as a course towards rapprochement with Iran

    The author is not quite right when he says that Washington began a course towards rapprochement of Iran (they only supported a little on some issues), if that were so, then why is the United States opposed to us putting the S-300 and Su-30 to Iran and on this occasion they themselves They said that they would fight by all means so that these supplies of weapons would not exist, which means that they still have plans for the destruction of Iran, and they are doing everything so that the conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia is ripe, possibly with Turkey. The author is right, the United States wants to turn the entire Middle East into a house and they are doing it as we see it, gradually supporting Iran a little and a little turned away from Saudi Arabia, I think everything is still ahead, time will tell
  10. Dam
    Dam April 7 2016 10: 01
    0
    These crowned freaks decided that money is everything. I think soon the map of BV will change a lot
  11. ratfly
    ratfly April 7 2016 10: 14
    +1
    Americans get thrown all, and friends and enemies.
    1. iouris
      iouris April 7 2016 11: 09
      0
      "Competitors" and "partners", not "enemies" or "friends".
    2. iouris
      iouris April 7 2016 11: 12
      +2
      I suspect that the shtA in Istanbul, Riyadh, Kiev (and yak same) and elsewhere write about the "imminent collapse of the Russian Federation." Let's take a look.
  12. 19max70
    19max70 April 7 2016 10: 27
    0
    There is a good proverb "Don't dig a hole for another, you'll get there yourself."
  13. saruman
    saruman April 7 2016 12: 27
    +2
    Quote: 0255
    The collapse of what we just did not promise - Ukraine, Turkey, Israel, the United States with their dollar system ... Where are all these collapses?


    Look how many states there were at the beginning of the 20th century and now ... You will be very surprised. The world is constantly in the process of "collapse" of states. There are only three connection cases in my memory:
    1) Germany with the GDR;
    2) China with Hong Kong;
    3) Russia with the Crimea.
    Moreover, the last case is just characterized by the "collapse" of Ukraine.
    The Turkish Republic is the result of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the United States of America is the result of the collapse of the British Empire (for the sake of justice, I will add the plus as a result of the collapse of the Spanish colonial empire, the former territories of which were captured or bought).
  14. iouris
    iouris April 7 2016 12: 40
    +4
    The United States is not the result of the collapse of the British Empire, but the first product of the globalization of capitalism and financial capital, which needed capitalism, free from the estate remnants of Europe that still exist there. The collapse of empires began when the United States became the first economy in the world.
    The USA was impossible in Eurasia. In this sense, the USA is Anti-Europe and even Anti-Eurasia.
    1. ydjin
      ydjin April 7 2016 13: 56
      +2
      Quote: iouris
      The United States is not the result of the collapse of the British Empire, but the first product of the globalization of capitalism and financial capital, which needed capitalism, free from the estate remnants of Europe that still exist there. The collapse of empires began when the United States became the first economy in the world.
      The USA was impossible in Eurasia. In this sense, the USA is Anti-Europe and even Anti-Eurasia.

      I agree with you, not in vain in literature and cinema before the era of the so-called globalization noticeable a certain piety of American inhabitants in front of aristacrotic Europe. Now, having objected to themselves as the navel of the Universe, the Americans resemble a presumptuous card sharper. Repeatedly deceiving, they considered themselves infallible rulers of the World !? I hope that it will be more painful for them to face the asphalt! fool Will be cut to the fullest!angry
  15. ydjin
    ydjin April 7 2016 13: 43
    +1
    Thanks to Alexander for the article, the chronology of this issue is clearly and stepwise laid out. Perhaps the motives of the current players are just a hunch (the dog knows them), but like Kipling. -The big game will never end until at least 2 players remain.
  16. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh April 7 2016 15: 32
    +2
    "Matryoshka crisis, which includes
    1) biosphere-ecological crisis,
    2) the crisis of capitalism and Western civilization,
    3) the crisis of man himself (his involution, degradation),
    4) the crisis of the white race,
    5) the crisis of biblical culture (Christianity and Islam). "////

    Cool! fellow
    Samsonov cannot be denied scale ...
    But from such a chic apocalypse he rolls to the small things -
    Saudi Arabia that rose to oil and will disappear
    after oil. The Bedouins will remain there, of course, as before.

    Compared to "involution, degradation of the person himself", somehow
    boring to read about the saudi problem sad .
  17. Arkan
    Arkan April 7 2016 18: 18
    0
    Anglo-Saxons bastards! Nothing, they dig a hole for their loved ones. The year of the war in Ymen, showed that the Saudis are a paper tiger. In general, the Anglo-Saxons do not have real allies, their entire pack is pugs. If Russia, China and India mobilize, then we cannot be defeated.
    1. Basarev
      Basarev April 8 2016 06: 20
      +1
      That's just China and India need only our technology and resources. It is foolish to consider them real allies, which in the Soviet years were Cuba and the GDR. In this light, India and China look as freebies as African socialist regimes.
  18. tracer
    tracer April 7 2016 21: 20
    0
    Off topic, just noticed. Today I listened to one of the FM channels in Kiev. Do you know people that something is changing there, in any case, the eyes of the local man in the street are cleared. No, we are of course "vanka" and "less brothers" but have not received attacking Colorado and the embodiment of universal evil on earth. "They are at least" NOT AGAINST US. "Tobish are for themselves .. and their brothers are now Belarusians first. But at least "not opposed" is already something .... And two years ago, after watching "ukrokanal", I almost attacked myself with all the Vlyska with a gilyaka.
    1. ramzes1776
      ramzes1776 April 8 2016 14: 27
      +1
      Quote: tracer
      Off topic, just noticed. Today I listened to one of the FM channels in Kiev. Do you know people that something is changing there, in any case, the eyes of the local man in the street are cleared. No, we are of course "vanka" and "less brothers" but have not received attacking Colorado and the embodiment of universal evil on earth. "They are at least" NOT AGAINST US. "Tobish are for themselves .. and their brothers are now Belarusians first. But at least "not opposed" is already something .... And two years ago, after watching "ukrokanal", I almost attacked myself with all the Vlyska with a gilyaka.

      But now we are against. With those who betrayed nothing even to begin to communicate.
  19. A_Alex
    A_Alex April 18 2016 13: 57
    0
    I think that many problems can be solved if the US is gouging and England is economically crushed