Complex "Zoo-1M" under the Syrian Palmyra

91
Western journalists published on the website gettyimages a photograph of the 1L261 radar machine of the 1L260 “Zoo-1M” rocket and artillery reconnaissance complex, which, judging by the inscription, was moving towards the Syrian city of Palmyra ( ancient Syrian city of Palmyra ”).



In this regard, the blog bmpd recalled a recent report by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, which stated: “Over the past three days, three modern complexes with unmanned aerial vehicles were additionally transferred to Khmeimim’s airfield, Two radar stations for detecting small targets that can detect the use of artillery weapons systems by terrorists ”.

According to the authors of the article, “it is primarily about the counter-battery radar" Zoo-1 ", which the Russian ground forces received in service in the 2007 year.

This complex “It is intended for reconnaissance of the positions of enemy fire weapons by calculating the ballistic trajectories recorded by the radar of shells and missiles, as well as for adjusting the fire of its own artillery. He can also monitor the airspace and control unmanned aerial vehicles ", - the article says.
  • Joseph Eid / gettyimages
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

91 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +35
    April 4 2016 16: 28
    Sneaky quasi-journal.
    1. +26
      April 4 2016 16: 40
      The system needs to be renamed to "Monkey 1M" - to specify who it is against.
      1. +9
        April 4 2016 17: 40
        You can "Basmachedav 1M" or "Basmachegon 1M".
      2. +9
        April 4 2016 22: 09
        Here the State Department can express resentment for hints wink
      3. +2
        April 5 2016 05: 23
        just the right name, designed to detect animals, there is a separate species, monkeys have nothing to do with it, they do not belong to such a dirty look
    2. +22
      April 4 2016 16: 41
      Probably specially shown, could at night or sheathed. Let them tremble.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +32
      April 4 2016 16: 59
      Quote: tiredwithall
      Sneaky quasi-journal.

      their fate is quite unenviable ...
    5. +28
      April 4 2016 17: 03
      Quote: tiredwithall
      Sneaky quasi-journal.

      I don’t think so. Rather, it is the work of our "journalists" in civilian clothes. Would such a thing just ride around Syria during the day and without covers? And even without cover.
      This is most likely an intentional "leak". In any case, this photo should make any mortar or artillery crew on the other side think seriously about their position.
      War is gradually acquiring the aspect of smoking cockroaches from crevices. Such a radar - it is like an AWACS aircraft - an important part for gaining dominance. Only he is in the air, and this one is on the earth.
      1. +5
        April 4 2016 17: 07
        Great name ... I really like it! Well damn give men ... good [media = http: // https: //youtu.be/xBFg3iGcL4M]
      2. +3
        April 4 2016 17: 12
        If this version is not zhurnalyugi, although quasi. But why warn potential customers. Surprise is better.
        1. +12
          April 4 2016 19: 31
          Quote: tiredwithall
          If this version is not zhurnalyugi, although quasi. But why warn potential customers. Surprise is better.

          "The best fight is the one that did not take place, where the victory was won without a fight" (孫子兵 法) - Sun Tzu, "The Art of War".
          1. +4
            April 5 2016 10: 06
            Quote: Shuttle
            "The best fight is the one that did not take place, where the victory was won without a fight" (孫子兵 法) - Sun Tzu, "The Art of War".

            In Syria, victory is not needed. We need the complete extermination of terrorists.
            1. +1
              April 5 2016 13: 01
              Somehow you contradict yourself, no?
            2. +1
              April 5 2016 17: 55
              Who doesn’t need! You?
              That is, Assad is fighting, and with it we, not until victory but before the complete destruction of terrorists? Will we give the victory to the Americans?
          2. +2
            April 6 2016 04: 17
            Yes, you’ve already defeated your Sun Tzu, what is interesting to learn about the fight that didn’t take place? This is the saying of a great Chinese man, a great Chinese nation, who at all times snatched from whom it was possible, teaches only one thing ... avoid a direct collision, try to defeat by cunning and deceit, use any goals to deceive your opponent! Does this teach you courage, valor and courage, maybe teach courage eh? Before you write, think about it, take an interest in the statements of the great generals about the treatise of the Chinese! uet much more really great people taking part in the great battles, whose statements seem more attractive for Russian man! luck Zi Zi ... even China ogrebaet with their great treatise for a thousand-plus years, all in a row with!
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +1
        April 4 2016 20: 13
        Quote: Shuttle
        Rather, it is the work of our "journalists" in civilian clothes

        With tongue removed. Such leaks are not random. Surely planned. The exact location is not disclosed. And then let them wait for the answer to arrive. Containing information. And the result will be, with which we will also be informed, in due time
    6. +2
      April 5 2016 00: 24
      Sneaky quasi-journal.

      Why quasi? Quite normal sneaky zhurnalyugi.
    7. +1
      April 5 2016 20: 22
      Sneaky quasi-journal.

      So the journalist’s ID has always been (and is) the perfect cover for a scout / spy.
  2. cap
    +3
    April 4 2016 16: 31
    Just a scribe!
    1. +10
      April 4 2016 16: 38
      Quote: cap
      Just a scribe!

      "Zoo" went to track the zoo. Yes
      1. +6
        April 4 2016 16: 59
        Jackals will be tracking. Big and small.
        But unlike the quite humane treatment of animals at the zoo, in this case humanism is a crime.
    2. +18
      April 4 2016 16: 53
      Quote: cap
      Just a scribe!

      Well yes ! Putin withdrew most of the group from Syria - the broads breathed a sigh of relief - after that, Iskander and the Zoo appeared there - the broads can be congratulated on another relief ...
      1. +7
        April 4 2016 17: 03
        Quote: lelikas
        Babakhs can be congratulated with another relief ....

        Now they will lighten up ... winked
        1. +3
          April 5 2016 07: 28
          It's as simple as an orange: this demonstration is aimed more at Erdogan and his gunners, who are shelling the territory of Syria with impunity! And now let them "scratch their turnips" before opening fire on the Syrian troops!
  3. +13
    April 4 2016 16: 31
    Our aircraft received "Zoo 1" in 2007. Maybe after repair or modernization .. This system has long been in service since the 80s. But anyway it is a good bream for all our partners and enemies ..
    1. +2
      April 4 2016 16: 37
      Quote: dmi.pris
      Our aircraft received "Zoo 1" in 2007 ??

      I agree. It also caught my eye. This is approximately the same as the fact that in 2007 our troops entered service with the T-34.
    2. +10
      April 4 2016 16: 43
      Quote: dmi.pris
      Our aircraft received "Zoo 1" in 2007. Maybe after repair or modernization .. This system has long been in service since the 80s. But anyway it is a good bream for all our partners and enemies ..

      Hmm ... you don't confuse him with "Lynx"? In the late 1s, the development of Zoo-80 was just started.
      The first reports of the entry into the troops of the Zoo radar appeared in the media in 2004. However, in this case, most likely, it was about the arrival of new equipment for military tests. February 19, 2008 it was officially announced the completion of tests of the "Zoo" in 2007.

      And the "Zoo-1M" ​​mentioned in the article was officially rolled out only in the summer of 2013.
      1. 0
        April 4 2016 17: 51
        Yes, here I agree with you. "Zoo1m" was indeed adopted recently.
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Quote: dmi.pris
        Our aircraft received "Zoo 1" in 2007. Maybe after repair or modernization .. This system has long been in service since the 80s. But anyway it is a good bream for all our partners and enemies ..

        Hmm ... you don't confuse him with "Lynx"? In the late 1s, the development of Zoo-80 was just started.
        The first reports of the entry into the troops of the Zoo radar appeared in the media in 2004. However, in this case, most likely, it was about the arrival of new equipment for military tests. February 19, 2008 it was officially announced the completion of tests of the "Zoo" in 2007.

        And the "Zoo-1M" ​​mentioned in the article was officially rolled out only in the summer of 2013.
        1. +2
          April 4 2016 18: 05
          Quote: dmi.pris
          "Zoo1m" was indeed adopted recently.

          It was not called "Zoo-2" only because the Ukrainians have such a machine ...

          Not only that, outwardly they look very much alike 8)))
    3. +1
      April 4 2016 19: 03
      In what other 2007? Wikipedia writes that it has been used since 2008))) ... We had such a battery in the artillery reconnaissance from 2004 to 2007 ... Moreover, there was already Glonass, although the number of satellites was not enough then ... Zoo is a new development ... From what other 80s, there is a phased array antenna there, I can be mistaken of course, but before this was not on such machines ... In the 80s there were Snar-10, PRP, ARK ...
  4. +3
    April 4 2016 16: 32
    Well, to find the target and adjust the fire on the enemy, what you need
    1. +1
      April 5 2016 03: 42
      Does the Zoo 1 name and metric calculation does not give yet?
  5. +3
    April 4 2016 16: 33
    Yeah, the Igil artillerymen will be in tense
    1. +9
      April 4 2016 16: 40
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Yeah, the Igil artillerymen will be in tense

      It would be nice to even say Bandera artillery!
      1. +6
        April 4 2016 16: 50
        Quote: Vita VKO
        It would be nice to even say Bandera artillery!

        is it that the very first thing that came to mind was it not possible on the basis of the data of this machine to prove and bend the high school students when the Donets fired at themselves? Or did the skis go or did I rub my ebony stick request can anyone explain? and judging by your ava you are approximately in the know smile the range is not enough or do we have these machines worth their weight in gold?
        1. +3
          April 4 2016 17: 04
          Quote: midivan
          Quote: Vita VKO
          It would be nice to even say Bandera artillery!

          here is the very first thing that came to mindcouldn’t it be possible, on the basis of the data of this machine, to prove and bend the high school students when the Donetsk residents fired on themselves?or the skis don’t ride or I rubbed my ebony stick request can anyone explain? and judging by your ava you are approximately in the know smile the range is not enough or do we have these machines worth their weight in gold?


          Who to prove?

          Who needs it, and so they know who does not need it, pretend that it is not

          Little is known about Boeing?

          1. +3
            April 4 2016 22: 07
            Quote: bulvas

            Who to prove?

            Who needs it, and so they know who does not need it, pretend that it is not

            Little is known about Boeing?

            let's say the world community, but about the Boeing it’s clear to many, but I don’t understand how to prove it is possible, but here it would be enough to stick a nose and suppress the firing points of the skaklah, but they can be said with impunity for the people hollowed, and I think if there is iron evidence, this is a trump card in the sleeve and at the right time it may appear, and now you can hint at the Dutch as well, you vote right on the 6th, otherwise you can get a Boeing and tell the world what investigators you are request something like that. IMHO
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          April 4 2016 17: 10
          Quote: midivan
          the range is not enough or do we have these machines worth their weight in gold?

          Yes, its weight in gold, and there are not many of them at all. I read correspondence on one site who had to participate in 2008 in South Ossetia. The machine didn’t show itself there, there were constant breakdowns and breakdowns until 08.08.2008. The unit could not immediately go to South Ossetia, the contractor who quit said that his car was in good condition for his entire service only a few days, or even not a single one, I don’t remember exactly.
          1. +3
            April 4 2016 17: 56
            That's how this jerk off so immediately everything became normal! And in Donetsk there are such mobile complexes.
            1. +1
              April 4 2016 19: 13
              Quote: Mercenary
              That's how this jerk off so immediately everything became normal! And in Donetsk there are such mobile complexes.

              That dope was not an officer, and something vryatli depended on him.

              Even Sergei Zgurets did not report the presence of such people in Donetsk. And vryat it can be quickly mastered, and wait for photographs of similar equipment from the DNI and LNR. Although it is likely that the use of such installations anywhere at the junction of the borders of Independent, LPR, Russia and on Russian territory is quite possible. The transported shtatovskie radars will sooner appear in the Donbas from the militia than "Zoo-1" or "Zoo-1M".
              1. +2
                April 4 2016 19: 29
                Quote: Captain Nemo
                Even Sergei Zgurets did not report such in Donetsk. And whether it can be quickly mastered, and wait for photos of similar equipment from the DNI and LC

                Need photos? You are welcome. laughing
                1. 0
                  April 4 2016 19: 48
                  Quote: Spade
                  Need photos?

                  This is "Stork", not "Zoo". According to its performance characteristics, it can track mines flying along a hinged trajectory, and not howitzer shells flying along a creeping trajectory.
                  1. +5
                    April 4 2016 22: 25
                    Quote: Captain Nemo
                    This is "Stork", not "Zoo". According to its performance characteristics, it can track mines flying along a hinged trajectory, and not howitzer shells flying along a creeping trajectory.

                    You know ... And this is essentially absolutely a drum, a mortar or a howitzer. Just drum, what is the trajectory. Because, for example, the height of the trajectory of the 82-mm mortar when shooting is basically much less than the height of the trajectory of the 122-mm D-30, firing at the maximum range.

                    This is just a matter of accuracy. In the ascending section of the trajectory, it is higher, in the descending section, lower. Any shell / mine at an ascending / descending station can be detected at a range of up to five kilometers.

                    This is a battalion level station, and no longer needed. In addition, it is universal, ARSOM / SNAR
                2. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +4
              April 4 2016 22: 16
              Quote: Mercenary
              That's how this jerk off so immediately everything became normal! And in Donetsk there are such mobile complexes.

              Well, firstly after that, a lot of time was sloppy, they could work on the mistakes and fix them. and what do these complexes work? judging by the nickname, I correctly understood that you were there? if so then enlighten if not a secret of course it worked no about this system? is there a result? (it is possible very briefly without attendance and passwords smile )
          2. +6
            April 4 2016 18: 11
            [
            Quote: Captain Nemo
            that in fully operational condition for his entire service his car was only a matter of days

            There was also an officer in my unit who served at the very first Zoo-1 and said the same thing. But already in 2006, he managed to study the Zoopak-1M radar, modernized by the Almaz-Antey concern. The difference between "earth and sky" is enormous both in terms of reliability and performance characteristics. These are practically different cars, even from the photograph.
          3. +3
            April 4 2016 21: 52
            Quote: Captain Nemo
            Yes, its weight in gold, and there are not many of them at all. I read correspondence on one site who had to participate in 2008 in South Ossetia. The machine didn’t show itself there, there were constant breakdowns and breakdowns until 08.08.2008.

            I realized thanks, now it has become clearer drinks hi
          4. 0
            April 6 2016 07: 49
            I do not think that the contractor, and even quit, is able to evaluate the product’s bg and still impartially declare it.
            externally, the 1L261 radar resembles SOC 9S18M1 of the Buk-M1 air defense system - according to operating experience, the machine is reliable (there were no serious equipment and chassis failures), if the calculation of 3 people does not try, and the contractors are not in the first roles there
        4. -5
          April 4 2016 17: 10
          Quote: midivan
          the range is not enough or do we have these machines worth their weight in gold?

          Yes, its weight in gold, and there are not many of them at all. I read correspondence on one site who had to participate in 2008 in South Ossetia. The machine didn’t show itself there, there were constant breakdowns and breakdowns until 08.08.2008. The unit could not immediately go to South Ossetia, the contractor who quit said that his car was in good condition for his entire service only a few days, or even not a single one, I don’t remember exactly.
          1. +3
            April 4 2016 19: 26
            Quote: Captain Nemo
            in South Ossetia. The car didn’t show itself there.

            Due to absence.

            They still had the old Soviet ARC / "Lynx" there. Which did not capitalize in any way in the hope that "they are about to be replaced"
        5. +1
          April 5 2016 09: 22
          Quote: midivan
          couldn’t it be possible, on the basis of the data of this machine, to prove and bend the high school students when the Donetsk residents fired on themselves?


          But how do you imagine the evidence * based on the data of this machine *?
          it’s not an optical reconnaissance satellite, it doesn’t give a video recording of the projectile’s flight, from the firing gun to the hit target ... it gives the parameters of the projectile’s trajectory, the direction from which the firing is being conducted + range, while it gives a graphical representation, at best ... and if there is a GLONAS link, no one will, moreover, will not give this info for free access ... and the picture there, again, isn’t on any media ...
        6. +1
          April 5 2016 20: 34
          couldn’t it be possible, on the basis of the data of this machine, to prove and bend the high school students when the Donetsk residents fired on themselves?

          For the West, ANY evidence of the atrocities of the punitive in New Russia are not! Especially the numbers in the logs of Russian equipment.
          There is a video where the Turks trade with ISIS oil, but there is no reaction to this. There are shots of shelling by Georgians in Tskhinval and peacekeepers - there is no reaction.
          The list goes on and on.
        7. 0
          April 6 2016 04: 22
          Do not judge by Ava, but you will not be judged hi !
    2. 0
      April 6 2016 04: 21
      These are what ..))), which shoot with cast-iron balls from pipes, or rather from large "ignition" ..? There will definitely be Turkish ones!
  6. +5
    April 4 2016 16: 34
    Great name "Zoo" - just right for black animals!
  7. +3
    April 4 2016 16: 34
    The zoo has arrived. The beards seem to be free, but at the same time in a cage. You will have to think a hundred times before "barking".
  8. +4
    April 4 2016 16: 39
    I read the word "zoo" and thought that again about Ukraine ...
  9. +1
    April 4 2016 16: 39
    The zoo has arrived. The circus left, though the clowns remained, but there will be no kin.
  10. +9
    April 4 2016 16: 42
    I like the humor of our designers ... Zmey Gorynich, Pinocchio, Zoo ... there the Goblin wanders, the Mermaid sits on the branches ... laughing
    1. +8
      April 4 2016 16: 46
      And this is not only the army. The Ministry of Internal Affairs also has full annealing in its names: a rubber stick "argument", handcuffs "tenderness", handcuffs with a stationary attachment "trick", escort handcuffs for 5 people "bouquet". laughing
  11. +1
    April 4 2016 16: 48
    I hope ours will give the zoo to the Syrians! After the war, it will be possible to cover Israeli points clearly.
  12. 0
    April 4 2016 16: 49
    This name is peaceful, and consonant, "Zoo" for a zoo. It seems that we will now fill Syria with our advanced developments so that the amer coalition itself will ask Assad to go for the next presidential term if only we would stop this coalition to "lower"
  13. +1
    April 4 2016 16: 55
    Exercises in real life or running-in equipment in a combat situation?
    And according to the results - modernization.
  14. -3
    April 4 2016 17: 10
    The "Zoo" can already be exhibited in museums of prehistoric animals in the Urals, where it was born in vain.
    1. +4
      April 4 2016 17: 25
      Quote: SergeyZel
      The "Zoo" can already be exhibited in museums of prehistoric animals in the Urals, where it was born in vain.

      ?
      Materiel you would do ... Study. Or geography.

      The Urals have nothing to do with Zoo-1, Zoo-1M, or Zoo-2.
      1. +1
        April 4 2016 17: 36
        Quote: Spade
        Materiel you would do ... Study. Or geography.

        The Urals have nothing to do with Zoo-1, Zoo-1M, or Zoo-2.

        Partially has. If you consider Yekaterinburg "Ural".

        But they gave birth to this complex really far from the Urals - in Tula.
        1. 0
          April 4 2016 18: 03
          And what is there in Yekaterinburg?
  15. +1
    April 4 2016 17: 21
    Only our designers can give such funny names for military equipment)
  16. +1
    April 4 2016 17: 59
    In the 1979 Rules of Shooting and Fire Control, there was already targeting with the help of ARSOM, aka ARC. What has grown into a "park for animals". Let's wait for information on the results of the use in Syria.
  17. 0
    April 4 2016 18: 55
    Quote: Mercenary
    And in Donetsk there are such mobile complexes.

    What else is there? And what is not there? Please share, but not everyone knows.
  18. 0
    April 4 2016 18: 57
    fur turn everyone up!
  19. hartlend
    0
    April 4 2016 19: 16
    There is a planned rotation of weapons. Those that have fulfilled their task are being deduced; for fulfilling new tasks, they are being introduced. Normal phenomenon.
  20. 0
    April 4 2016 20: 12
    Zoo-1M will understand all this flying back and forth in a zoo of missiles, mines, and shells of various calibers. smile
  21. 0
    April 4 2016 20: 58
    Cool stuff! In modern conflicts is very necessary. We need a couple in the Donbass, for the return destruction of artillery vsu.
  22. +1
    April 4 2016 21: 26
    The zoo came to catch the last beast. Techniques in Russia - mothers are immensely new - we must have time to test everything in combat conditions.
  23. 0
    April 4 2016 23: 04
    I would have bought a couple of such complexes wink
    1. 0
      April 6 2016 14: 51
      Will there be enough pennies?
  24. +1
    April 5 2016 00: 06
    But I looked at the road in Syria, and sighed, in Ryazan, the road is just terrible, and here you can see the old, but good road ... eh ..
  25. -2
    April 5 2016 01: 55
    All the time the question arises: who in today's Russia gives names to weapons systems, in particular, what kind of ZOO. Well, really it was impossible to come up with something harmonious close to this system. Under the USSR, it was at least much better.
  26. +1
    April 5 2016 09: 03
    As I understand it, there is nothing to discuss so far. There are no personal acquaintances with this technique. The results of the application will be later. But it is still nice to have them in battle formations.
  27. 0
    April 5 2016 14: 52
    Quote: Shuttle
    Quote: tiredwithall
    If this version is not zhurnalyugi, although quasi. But why warn potential customers. Surprise is better.

    "The best fight is the one that did not take place, where the victory was won without a fight" (孫子兵 法) - Sun Tzu, "The Art of War".

    Can’t you bring our wisdom?
  28. 0
    April 5 2016 20: 27
    Quote: In100gram
    With tongue removed. Such leaks are not random. Surely planned. The exact location is not disclosed. And then let them wait for the answer to arrive. Containing information. And the result will be, with which we will also be informed, in due time

    As with the Iskander in Khmeimim.
  29. 0
    April 5 2016 21: 13
    And why without security?
    1. 0
      April 6 2016 14: 52
      And where is it that without security?
  30. 0
    April 5 2016 22: 18
    Testing all types of weapons in combat conditions. Crew training and calculations.
  31. 0
    April 5 2016 22: 34
    The name of the radar amuses.
    While reading the article, I also thought about the Donbass.
  32. 0
    April 6 2016 03: 52
    And when such complexes will be in the Donbass. There, the Cops hit the peaceful people from all calibers.
  33. 0
    April 6 2016 04: 42
    With our "Zoo" Karabas will have a hard time .. The Russians will surely and carefully gut their monkey house ..
  34. 0
    April 6 2016 11: 35
    I am happy to read materials about the advantage of our weapons systems! Levsha could do talentedly. Piece. With fiction. Alas, in a single copy. Can we provide troops with hundreds or thousands? How are they waiting ...
  35. 0
    April 6 2016 12: 45
    The presence of such equipment in Syria (with a playful name) is a good warning and deterrent.
  36. 0
    April 6 2016 14: 44
    I was always impressed by the names "Zoo", "Aistenok", "Carnation" "Chrysanthemum" ... What cannot be taken away from the MO is the sense of humor!
    1. +1
      April 6 2016 20: 48
      Assignment of names to models (products) of types and types of weapons is usually carried out in accordance with one of the established traditions:

      by the name of R&D, competition or the desire of designers: “Rook”, “Judge” and the like;
      according to the letter of modification: “Angara” - S-200A, “Vega” - S-200V, “Dubna” - S-200D, etc .;
      abbreviation: “Kord” - Kovrov Orzujnikiki-Degtyarevtsy; "Nona" - the New Land Artillery Cannon, etc .;
      according to the logic of the series: self-propelled guns - “flower series”: “Hyacinth”, “Tulip”, “Peony”; air defense systems - “river series”: “Shilka”, “Tunguska”, “Dvina”, “Neva”; MLRS - natural disasters: “Grad”, “Tornado”, “Hurricane”;
      associative: man-portable air defense systems - "Arrow", "Needle"; jamming system - "Moshkara"; camouflage sniper costumes - “The Hobbit”, “Kikimora”;
      military humor or military jargon: handcuffs - "Tenderness"; infantry shoulder blade and a family of radio stations - "Excitement", a heavy flamethrower system - "Pinocchio";
      in honor of the creators: tank "Vladimir" (named after the chief designer); Antey-2500 anti-aircraft missile system (according to the name of the developing company);
      by a pronounced property or action: tank dynamic protection "Contact" (triggered upon contact); fire extinguishing system "Hoarfrost" (sprays powder), a shot to the under-barrel grenade launcher - "Foundling" (after colliding with an obstacle, an expelling charge throws a grenade to a height of 2-3 meters, where the explosion occurs) "
  37. 0
    April 7 2016 10: 06
    Quote: Alexey RA
    Hmm ... you don't confuse him with "Lynx"? In the late 1s, the development of Zoo-80 was just started.

    In the GSVG, at the Magdeburg firing range in 1980, I gave canals from Don-12 vs P-404 to the artillerymen, who said they were "working" at Zoo-1.
    Or am I confusing something?
  38. 0
    April 7 2016 10: 16
    freedom of speech

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"