Military Review

"Admiral Kuznetsov" in the fall will enter the Mediterranean Sea with fighters Su-33 and MiG-29K on board

81
Airborne cruiser "Admiral Kuznetsov" will lead the Russian naval grouping in the Mediterranean Sea, on board will be carrier-based aircraft Su-33, Su-25UTG and MiG-29K, reports MIC with reference to tass.




“In accordance with the plans of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Admiral Kuznetsov will enter the Mediterranean Sea in September-October, where he will head the permanent grouping of ships of the Russian Navy. The cruiser will carry on board the mixed air group of carrier-based Su-33, Su-25UTG and MiG-29K aircraft, ”a military source told the agency.

He noted that "MiG-29K / KUB fighters were tested on the Kuznetsov in the 2009 year, but since then they have not been stationed on a cruiser on an ongoing basis."

“In the months remaining before the start of the cruise, the crews of the aircraft will hone skills of takeoff and landing on the deck of the aircraft carrier at ground test training complexes in Saki and Yeisk,” the source added.

Help "MIC": “MiG-29K is a new Russian carrier-based fighter designed for the air defense of ship formations, gaining air supremacy and destroying surface and ground targets. The contract for the supply of Navy 24 aircraft in single and double versions was concluded in February 2012 year. "
Photos used:
http://blackseafleet-21.com
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. SHAMAN
    SHAMAN April 3 2016 09: 32
    +1
    I hope our pilots misbehave in the middle of the world ...!
    1. svp67
      svp67 April 3 2016 09: 38
      +13
      Quote: SHAMAN
      I hope our pilots misbehave in the middle of the world ...!

      Do not hope that everything wakes up decently - they will beat hard and accurately ...
      1. Kos_kalinki9
        Kos_kalinki9 April 3 2016 10: 02
        +1
        and right on target.
    2. Finches
      Finches April 3 2016 09: 40
      +3
      It's good! Speaking a little Aesopian language, through a joke about a husband and wife - When I come in - this is us come in. But when you will go - this is us will go. laughing
    3. ECT
      ECT April 3 2016 11: 07
      +2
      I think it is planned to work with the new "Egyptian" helicopter carriers. By this time they will already be completed.
    4. Sergei1982
      Sergei1982 April 3 2016 17: 41
      0
      I don’t know where to place, a new contract for the Su-30SM
      As part of the implementation of the state defense order GOZ 2016-2018, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and PJSC Irkut Corporation, part of the United Aircraft Corporation, entered into a contract for the supply of multipurpose fighters to the Russian Aerospace Forces
      Su-30SM.

      The state contract for the supply was signed by Deputy Minister of Defense Yuri Borisov and President of Irkut Corporation Oleg Demchenko.

      In accordance with the terms of the contract, by the end of 2018, more than 30 Su-30SM multi-role fighters will be handed over to the Air Force.
  2. Observer2014
    Observer2014 April 3 2016 09: 32
    +4
    "Admiral Kuznetsov" will enter the Mediterranean in autumn with Su-33 and MiG-29K fighters on board "
    What gang was trying to attack Aleppo yesterday?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 April 3 2016 10: 24
      +6
      Watching about what episodes. Only Nusra achieved success - taking Eys. And there, the Hezah with the Iraqis perished mainly, that is, the most trained and persistent.

      An SSA was advancing on Khan Fog - that is, the most that are not moderate. Also yesterday Ahrar began to push in the south of Aleppo, also on the Fog.

      In Latakia, Ahrar and the SSA are trying to overcome the village of Nahshebe and are fighting on Kitsaba with tanks and artillery. There are fights.





      Only Kuzya will not come soon, but you need to crush cast iron now. And there are basically forces for this, however, while the Moscow Region has taken such an official position:
      HMEIMIM (Syria), April 2 - RIA Novosti. Syrian troops were forced to leave their positions in the El-Es area of ​​Aleppo province after the shelling and attack of Jabhat al-Nusra, Sergei Kuralenko, head of the Russian Center for the Reconciliation of Warring Parties in Syria, told reporters.
      "In the area of ​​the settlements of El-Es, Abur-Rvel and Khan-Tuman of the Aleppo province, the Jabhat al-Nusra gangs, after half an hour of artillery preparation, went on the offensive and forced the government troops, who had an order not to respond to provocations, to leave their positions in the region El Es and move off in a northeast direction", - he said.
      1. dyksi
        dyksi April 3 2016 13: 00
        -1
        Yes, with such orders, you can retreat to Damascus. Once again I am convinced that there is nothing peaceful in the truce. You can also remember the Donbass, where the ukrovoyaks, taking advantage of the truce, meter by meter, absorb the territory of Dobass. I hope the Armenians in Karabakh will take this into account and do not buy such gizmos. In Syria, the militants need a truce only to lick their wounds, replenish "personnel" and weapons, regroup and voila, a new offensive. All the most combat-ready Syrian units are now in the south of the country, and in the north, through Idlib, convoys with people and weapons are quietly passing. We took the VKS out early. Map of battles in the south of Alepo. El-Eis is surrendered, there are battles for Khan-Tuman, Barn was able to return.
  3. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 April 3 2016 09: 35
    +3
    And he will continue to test in a situation close to the combat ...
  4. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 April 3 2016 09: 36
    +2
    Also test the decks in a combat environment.
  5. Safer
    Safer April 3 2016 09: 36
    +6
    Oh, there will be a cry ... I already see these headlines "The EU and NATO strongly condemn the actions of Moscow, which has sent an aircraft carrier group to the Mediterranean." ...
    1. midivan
      midivan April 3 2016 22: 15
      +3
      Quote: Safer
      Oh, there will be a cry ... I already see these headlines "The EU and NATO strongly condemn the actions of Moscow, which has sent an aircraft carrier group to the Mediterranean." ...

      and we will tell them that he took "Mildronate" meldonium "to help the Syrian army smileand who will slam the fins and meldonut the might, either shallow or the bottom laughing
  6. Leprekon
    Leprekon April 3 2016 09: 40
    +2
    Still, and "Nakhimov" with calibers in PU!
  7. KnightRider
    KnightRider April 3 2016 09: 42
    +5
    And they wanted to send it like in the summer ... Well, okay, then it’s going to work with Migami soldier
    1. cesar65
      cesar65 April 3 2016 10: 08
      +14
      I'm glad that MiGs are finally included in the air group. 25 years ago took part in the creation of the first MiG-29K
      1. ametist415
        ametist415 April 3 2016 10: 52
        +1
        Sukhoi always pressed Mikoyan's design bureau.
      2. aviator65
        aviator65 April 3 2016 11: 12
        +1
        Greetings, colleague! drinks
  8. WE ARE MAKING
    WE ARE MAKING April 3 2016 09: 43
    +11
    And you say the Russian aircraft carriers are not needed ... Not 11 of course like the United States, but at least one for each fleet is necessary :)
    1. Winnie76
      Winnie76 April 3 2016 11: 14
      +2
      So far, they have done well without Kuzi. Maybe we will finally see in business ...
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich April 3 2016 14: 38
      0
      Quote: AGAIN
      And you say the Russian aircraft carriers are not needed ...

      and then he directly helped out?))) while he’s walking, you can iron out from the territory of the Russian Federation at least something ... and then, just annoying that pilots with at least experience, how will it be? this is for staff members a hundred landings, a common thing, but ours? on the fingers ... not ours, not ours. there is no serious contribution, there will be no serious return.
  9. kamski
    kamski April 3 2016 09: 45
    -8
    Without a catapult and the springboard itself does not look very serious.
    1. Safer
      Safer April 3 2016 09: 49
      +11
      Not very serious? It is itself a combat unit, and even carries an aviation group on itself, which can work for any purpose. Where is it more serious? Does your catapult make an aircraft carrier serious?
      1. ametist415
        ametist415 April 3 2016 10: 55
        -6
        Load the plane to the maximum of bombs and missiles, fill up a full tank and you will not take off. Trampoline - sabotage, only catapult.
        1. Safer
          Safer April 3 2016 11: 21
          +8
          With a full BC (10 suspension units) and 9 tons of fuel on board the SU-33, they easily take off. I don’t quite understand what are you appealing to? Only one SU-33 sank while landing on the TAKR Admiral Kuznetsov (cable breakage aerofinisher). 100% take-offs were successful. Well, except for the incident, during the SU-27k test, when the afterburners burned the shield.
          1. ametist415
            ametist415 April 3 2016 15: 24
            -9
            At the springboard, the aircraft has to bring out engines with full boost. Increased turbine wear and fuel consumption, the aircraft will fly by less and the operating time will be shorter.
            1. midivan
              midivan April 3 2016 22: 22
              +4
              Quote: ametist415
              At the springboard, the aircraft has to bring out engines with full boost. Increased turbine wear and fuel consumption, the aircraft will fly by less and the operating time will be shorter.

              and what is our problem? no engines? ran out of oil for fuel?
          2. ametist415
            ametist415 April 3 2016 15: 34
            -7
            At 4:15 minutes you can see how they take off from the catapult. The Americans specifically criticized their aircraft carriers and at the same time they were built so that the Russians would rely on it, and they succeeded, we built a pre-aircraft carrier with a springboard.
            1. Safer
              Safer April 3 2016 15: 49
              +1
              Thank you, now I understand more. In this case, the question is - Do you start planes from American and European aircraft carriers without afterburner? Well with a catapult then? Start exactly the same. Explain: Why is one take-off system worse than another?
              1. ametist415
                ametist415 April 3 2016 16: 42
                -4
                Read all my comments on this article, everything is clear there, I hope. The bitter truth is the truth that many do not like.
                1. Drmadfisher
                  Drmadfisher April 4 2016 18: 28
                  0
                  take a look at your little hooks, maybe you’ll understand, though ....... laughing
                  1. ametist415
                    ametist415 April 4 2016 21: 25
                    -1
                    what are you fucking chtoli
            2. Boa kaa
              Boa kaa April 3 2016 17: 33
              +6
              Quote: ametist415
              the Russians turned to it, and they succeeded, we built a pre-aircraft carrier with a springboard.

              The pioneers in such, with a springboard, aircraft carriers were the British. Then we built a series. Today GB is building 2 AVUs with jumps. And what from this?
              Who was "led" where? Maybe something else?
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh April 3 2016 18: 10
                +2
                Saving. A full-fledged aircraft carrier with a catapult is very expensive.
                The British saved for their light Harriers.
                Their latest Queen Elizabeth class under construction has a springboard, but
                the project also provides for the possibility of mounting a catapult
                (dimensions and layout allow). Insured ...
                1. albert
                  albert April 3 2016 20: 00
                  0
                  On "Ulyanovsk", which was never completed, they also planned a catapult and a springboard.
            3. midivan
              midivan April 3 2016 22: 30
              +5
              Quote: ametist415
              At 4:15 minutes you can see how they take off from the catapult. The Americans specifically criticized their aircraft carriers and at the same time they were built so that the Russians would rely on it, and they succeeded, we built a pre-aircraft carrier with a springboard.

              I’m certainly not competent in this industry, I could be wrong, but I heard (read) a long time ago that ours refused a catapult (steam), primarily due to the fact that in conditions of negative subzero temperatures, freezing occurs on the steam, ice and so on and so on, and we seem to have everywhere the middle-earth smile
            4. Stanislas
              Stanislas April 4 2016 10: 18
              +1
              Quote: ametist415
              The Americans specifically criticized their aircraft carriers and at the same time they were built so that the Russians would rely on it, and they succeeded
              Criticize your aircraft carriers and continue to build them so that the Russians are led ... Why are you doing this with logic? Well, you didn’t have a relationship with her, what now, immediately kill her?
          3. kamski
            kamski April 3 2016 20: 13
            0
            When starting without a catapult, the engines are put into the "emergency afterburner" mode before the start of the takeoff run, which leads to premature depletion of their resource and increased fuel consumption. In addition, the lower rate of the air group's ascent into the air dictates the condition of a longer waiting period at the assembly point, which also leads to excessive fuel consumption, a decrease in the combat radius, etc.
      2. kamski
        kamski April 3 2016 20: 00
        0
        Yes, of course, with a catapult, the aircraft carries a heavy load, the time it takes for the aircraft to fly into the air is also not many times, but an order of magnitude higher. In addition to the advantages of a catapult is its lower threshold for sensitivity to take-off conditions. An aircraft carrier with a catapult can continue to carry out take-off operations with more stringent parameters of pitching, wind, waves, etc.
        1. ism_ek
          ism_ek April 3 2016 21: 59
          +2
          The catapult allows you to start from the deck of a turboprop aircraft drills (early warning radar). The rest of the catapult has no significant advantages. But there are a lot of shortcomings. The catapult is difficult to operate and requires a lot of energy. Catapult, significantly complicates the ship and reduces its sailing time.
          If our Kuznetsov floats as much as being repaired, then American aircraft carriers equipped with a catapult are repaired twice as much as they are floated.

          Remember, the French president threatened ISIS with his atomic aircraft carrier with catapults ....
          1. kamski
            kamski April 4 2016 18: 18
            0
            for a ship with a nuclear reactor there is no such thing as a lack of energy will be as much as needed. The operation of aircraft carriers in the United States showed very high reliability, by the way 4 catapults stand on them. Look at which Air Group the United States carrier carries and what is on board Kuznetsov. And this is not a big difference, I won’t write about the pros earlier. With all the apparent simplicity of the Catapult, the USSR could not finish it, so Kuznetsov was born without a catapult
        2. midivan
          midivan April 3 2016 22: 34
          +3
          Quote: kamski
          An aircraft carrier with a catapult can continue to carry out take-off operations with more stringent parameters of pitching, wind, waves, etc.

          and landing? or not the main thing? the main thing is to kick him, but is another story going to sit down or not? laughing
  10. igorra
    igorra April 3 2016 09: 56
    +7
    There is not much sense in sending militarily, I think testing and gaining experience come first.
    1. ism_ek
      ism_ek April 3 2016 22: 02
      0
      In Syria, it was possible to do without the "Caliber", but the ship must sail, otherwise it must be sent for scrap.
  11. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa April 3 2016 09: 57
    +3
    Looking forward to. I hope there will be combat sorties.
  12. Severok
    Severok April 3 2016 10: 02
    +6
    If only the power plant "Kuzi" did not fail again .... And so - seven feet under the keel and clear sky!
    1. ametist415
      ametist415 April 3 2016 10: 58
      .
      Can he do this more than once? I don’t think so.
      1. cap
        cap April 3 2016 11: 29
        +5
        Quote: ametist415
        Can he do this more than once? I don’t think so.


        Rotten photoshop. Do not disgrace. At IN not kindergarten.
        Or do you not understand yet?
        The main thing is not clear, what are you pursuing with provocative questions?
        Already three throws provocative. If I am not mistaken.


        1. ametist415
          ametist415 April 3 2016 11: 56
          -3
          This is not photoshop.
          1. mike_z
            mike_z April 3 2016 12: 14
            +4
            So what? What do you want to prove these videos? Guys are experiencing pitching sedatives. And we do this periodically, in accordance with the requirements of the regulations. Are they raising planes dynamically? And then we created a stationary roll and are happy. What is so special? Please explain.
            1. ametist415
              ametist415 April 3 2016 12: 25
              .
              My position is this, my old comment is:
              Etc. 11435 trough, and CVN - high-tech, fairly versatile ships. Is it idiocy or deliberate wrecking to have RCC on an aircraft carrier if you are always guarded by a missile cruiser and not one. Instead of launching shafts, free space is best used for the needs of an air wing. Due to the relatively small displacement, it shakes it elementarily, and you will not take off. In general, AB should be large, atomic and with catapults. It's a shame that we were going to make such a ship - pr. 1160, but the top leadership blocked this decision and instead did the pre-Avian carriers pr. 1143. This is wrecking with elements of treason.

              As a result, we have normal ships in the pictures, and they have:
              - What did you do today?
              - Drifting on an aircraft carrier!))
              1. kamski
                kamski April 3 2016 20: 37
                -3
                That's right, you need to look at things objectively
                1. ametist415
                  ametist415 April 3 2016 21: 47
                  -4
                  Thank you!
                2. Drmadfisher
                  Drmadfisher April 4 2016 18: 30
                  0
                  two govnososa ..............................
              2. mike_z
                mike_z April 3 2016 22: 04
                +2
                Quote: ametist415
                In general, AB should be large, atomic and with catapults.

                I repeat once again for major specialists: the VM doctrine of the USSR did not provide for the construction of aircraft carriers. Right or wrong not to judge me, I'm just a mechanic. The cruiser was built. But an aircraft carrier! What the hell is the Kuznetsov missile cruiser guarding? In life, this was not, he is self-sufficient, because the cruiser in the first place. And you are trying to compare ships of different classes. It is nonsense. Its tasks are not the same as those of an aircraft carrier. And, I dare to assure you, as a squadron headquarters officer who traveled many miles on the Kuznetsov, that this is a combat ship. Although there are many disadvantages.
                1. ametist415
                  ametist415 April 4 2016 13: 38
                  -2
                  That's right, it's not right not for me to judge, I'm just a mechanic.

                  This is a fear of responsibility for oneself, one’s thoughts and actions. Let others decide, I'm just a mechanic. This is slave psychology, a big problem for many people. One of the main reasons for the collapse of the USSR.
                  1. mike_z
                    mike_z April 4 2016 14: 11
                    0
                    Quote: ametist415
                    This is a fear of responsibility for oneself, one’s thoughts and actions. Let others decide, I'm just a mechanic. This is slave psychology, a big problem for many people. One of the main reasons for the collapse of the USSR.


                    Sweetheart! You messed up the sites. This is not "Censor" or "Glory to Ukraine", but "Voennoye Obozreniye". They discuss technical issues here, mostly.
                    Well, but in essence the next stupidity you expressed ... I would like to look at the state where everyone is responsible for making political decisions. In my opinion, this was the last time practiced at the Novgorod veche. And even then, the people spoke out, and the prince made a decision and was responsible. And I took the Oath and served where the Motherland sent. Russian officers were never slaves. And for such statements do not get too short for the full.
                2. ametist415
                  ametist415 April 13 2016 11: 29
                  0
                  Tighten a little intelligence to solve one simple operation, to understand with the advent of Khrushchev and the elimination of Stalin, who was going to build an ocean carrier fleet, the VM doctrine of the USSR became wrong.
      2. mike_z
        mike_z April 3 2016 11: 33
        +1
        Quote: ametist415
        I do not think.

        Do not think in vain. He can do this and have done it more than once. And what are the doubts, actually? The sea is different, does it shake wrong? Or do you think that Americans raise aviation with such a roll? Do not raise. And we do not raise. Or did you mean something else? Besides the roll?
        1. ametist415
          ametist415 April 3 2016 12: 11
          -7
          All Full Ahead and Hard Port or Hard Starboard. I certainly exaggerate, but:

          In any case, the ABG power plant should be reliable and able to operate at maximum
          mode for a long time. So, when conducting military operations and the average rate of up to 3-4 sorties per plane per day, it will be necessary to provide up to 200 daily sorties. Consequently, the duration of all take-offs and landings will be about 480-500 minutes (landing of one aircraft 1.5-2 minutes, take-off of one aircraft 0.5 minutes). All this time, about 8-8.5 hours, AB should go at a speed of 28-30 knots. If you add time to this set of this
          speed (at least 3-4 such speed sets for takeoff and 3-4 for landing), then the total duration of the AB movement at a speed of more than 25 knots can be about 9 hours. Thus, about 38% per day of a power plant should operate at a mode close to maximum.

          Excerpt from the book of V.P. Kuzin, V.I. Nikolsky Navy of the USSR 1945-1991.
          1. mike_z
            mike_z April 3 2016 12: 39
            +5
            Complete nonsense! When flying aircraft, the US aircraft carrier has a stroke of no more than 9 knots !!! Where did the authors of this opus get such data? And he develops 30-32 nodes during relocation, usually at night. I participated in tracking the most at that time (1985, Mediterranean, EM "Sovremenny" pr.956) by the modern CCV USA "Dwight Eisenhower", for 3 weeks in a row! Every night we announced BG-1 for BCH-5, because developed up to 32 knots and kept the course up to 5 hours! Never lost an aircraft carrier! Never! Then we chased Chester Nimitz for a couple of days. almost the same. The rest of the timing is set out correctly - takeoff - 2 aircraft per minute, landing 1 aircraft in 2-150 minutes, up to 8 takeoffs and landings per shift at XNUMX o'clock.
            1. kamski
              kamski April 3 2016 21: 23
              -2
              Dear you are talking nonsense, who told you this. The speed of an aircraft carrier when launching aircraft depends on weather conditions. At launch and landing, the wind speed and direction of the aircraft carrier are taken into account, the aircraft carrier turns in the direction of the wind if conditions allow. The rest is done with screws, there are certain requirements
              1. mike_z
                mike_z April 3 2016 21: 51
                +1
                What did I write? I don’t know about the Amers, but the “Kuznetsov” speed of the oncoming air flow must be at least 9 knots. I am not a navigator or a pilot, so I explain simply. If the wind is strong (headwind of course), then the ship can have a speed of 9z.-Vwind "Eisenhower" during the work of aviation never developed a high speed, we did not even develop an average speed (13 knots), went small.
      3. VP
        VP April 3 2016 12: 04
        +2
        And why such a roll so that everything goes in the hangar?
        Purely something poikikovsky?
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich April 3 2016 14: 41
        +4
        Quote: ametist415
        Can he do this more than once? I don’t think so.

        I would like to ask obscenely, but I just left the "bathhouse", so I will ask in print: why? my child, this is not a boat, and in general, go do your homework already ... well, or crush pimples ... also more benefit.
        1. ametist415
          ametist415 April 3 2016 16: 59
          -4
          Do not be distracted, work.
      6. Drmadfisher
        Drmadfisher April 4 2016 18: 29
        0
        go to guano. penguin driver
        1. ametist415
          ametist415 April 4 2016 20: 51
          0
          you got into a bad matrix for you
  13. vglazunov
    vglazunov April 3 2016 10: 03
    +2
    This news should affectionately bury the hopes of terrorists and their accomplices in the person of the USA, Turkey, Saudi Arabia ...
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 April 3 2016 10: 31
      +6
      Why? There are more planes at Khmemim now than Kuzya can even accommodate on paper. In reality, there will be 4 Su-25UTG (which do not carry any weapons at all, to lighten the weight and improve the aerodynamics of the 4 pylon under the PTB, the rest are tightly cut), 4-6-8 MiGs and as many Dryers.

      The transfer of 12 Ducklings to Khmemim much more lowers the chances of broads and sponsors than Kuzya. That's real.
      1. vglazunov
        vglazunov April 3 2016 13: 37
        +2
        It is inappropriate to compare the base on the mainland and Kuzya, but mobile support "from different angles" on the battlefield does not even hurt laughing
  14. X Y Z
    X Y Z April 3 2016 10: 03
    +5
    I foresee a new article by our friend Dave Majumdar, in which he compares our aircraft carrier and the latest American aircraft carrier.
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk April 3 2016 10: 18
      +1
      And in conclusion he writes that it is incorrect to compare them laughing
      1. ametist415
        ametist415 April 3 2016 11: 00
        .
        Would you compare the Lada "four" with the Mustang?
        1. mike_z
          mike_z April 3 2016 11: 43
          +6
          I see you are an expert in our fleet. I can explain - we took "Kuznetsov" to the Federation Council in 1992. Yes, shipbuilding has stepped forward since then. But I dare to assure you that the ship is modernized and fully operational. And not his age in this case is the decisive factor. This is not an aircraft carrier in the full sense of this class of ships, but an aircraft-carrying cruiser, so your comparison has nothing to do with reality. Kuznetsov has his own tasks and he fulfilled them even in the worst times. It was not easy for us, these were not pleasure cruises, of course, but, I repeat, we completed the tasks. And the Americans, by the way, have always had a high opinion of us.
        2. ferdiperdozzz
          ferdiperdozzz April 3 2016 11: 51
          +3
          Quote: ametist415
          Would you compare the Lada "four" with the Mustang?

          With a horse in the sense of? Well, more precisely with a horse.
        3. VP
          VP April 3 2016 12: 05
          +3
          You are terribly blazing.
        4. the villain
          the villain April 3 2016 12: 24
          +9
          Quote: ametist415
          Would you compare the Lada "four" with the Mustang?

          It depends on what the car is for, it may come out that the comparison of nichrome is not in favor of the Mustang hi
  15. shinobi
    shinobi April 3 2016 10: 05
    +3
    It will help the Syrians to clean the coastline from the ISIS, and cut off the supply by sea. Something like that.
  16. Stas157
    Stas157 April 3 2016 10: 36
    +3
    Finally! This is exactly what Syria still lacked! An aircraft carrier with the new Mig-29K in Syria, in addition to Caliber, is like a cherry on a cake! Without this, the picture of a demonstration of Russian power would not be complete. Maybe, of course, there is no urgent need for practical application. But the pilots and sailors need to run in and check in a serious matter.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 3 2016 18: 16
      +9
      Quote: Stas157
      But the pilots and sailors need to run in and check in a serious matter.
      I patiently waited for sound thought. Waited.
      In the North - the polar night, frosts. To keep the flyers from losing their skills, they need to train all the time. Therefore, even in prosperous Soviet times, TAKRs all the time went to Mediterranean for the winter. “Kiev” was more fortunate. He went to Cuba in 1982. Received the Order of the Red Banner.
      Yes, the commander will receive a combat order to maintain the operational regime and prevent the naval activities of the unfriendly Syria sides off the coast of the SAR. Most likely in the Latakia region. But, even if all this had not happened, TAVKR would have gone to the Mediterranean for the winter anyway.
      Pilots need to train, fly. And here it will even be interesting: in the role of a real enemy, NATO members will play along. So much for the "interception of the VTs", and if you're lucky, then you can "tinker". And there was such a practice in Soviet times. Alifanov and Kolya Edush on a flying log (YAK-38M) managed to put the French into a stupor. And this also happened. Again, it will be possible to work out the combat use of the BC. If such a task is set. It all depends on the tasks set.
      Yours faithfully, hi
  17. demiurg
    demiurg April 3 2016 10: 40
    +4
    I wrote in a different topic, they just run around the su-33 and instant-29k in combat conditions. On an aircraft carrier, fuel for aircraft and ammunition for another week. And replenish only from the shore. The SVVP-24 decks do not have, just like the Su-24m will not be able to throw simple cast-iron, only guided weapons. But it’s expensive, and there’s no sense in it anymore, everything that can be processed into ferrous metal before them from Khmeinima. They scare the Turks, they will see the world, they will get acquainted with the new theater. It’s also a necessary thing.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 3 2016 18: 21
      +3
      Quote: demiurg
      And replenish only from the shore.

      But have tankers already run out? Or does KKS not count?
      Quote: demiurg
      get acquainted with the new theater.
      It's a good thing, of course. But "theater" has been studied. Unless, of course, svidomye new islands were not poured there and fairways were not laid ... laughing
  18. aszzz888
    aszzz888 April 3 2016 10: 40
    +2
    Again, bubuinia will conquer that we are sending troops! Already before September, in advance, they will begin to worry! laughing
  19. mvg
    mvg April 3 2016 11: 23
    +1
    Quote: vglazunov
    This news should affectionately bury the hopes of terrorists and their accomplices in the person of the USA, Turkey, Saudi Arabia ...

    Already crap ... As soon as the news of the media was opened ... It was yours, Kuzya himself went out to sea, and NEVER the last time to work out air defense (an aircraft carrier goes out on exercises to shoot with Daggers or Wasps lol ), and right already with the planes !!!
  20. samoletil18
    samoletil18 April 3 2016 12: 46
    0
    Maybe it was possible to implement the SVVP-24 aircraft. Well or something like that. High-precision marine-based cast iron will appear wink. Let the partners be scared.
  21. goblin xnumx
    goblin xnumx April 3 2016 12: 50
    +1
    at least painted - it’s nice to look, but if they brought the GEM to life, it’s very good, it’s already the benefit of the preparation for the trip :)
  22. Wiruz
    Wiruz April 3 2016 13: 53
    -2
    But have you already prepared a squadron for him? The destroyers there, cruisers, well, frigates at least?
    What is the point in AB if there is no full AUG? Ah, yes, Ponte. Zhurnalyugi still say "an aircraft-carrying cruiser that has no analogues in the world" laughing
    1. albert
      albert April 3 2016 20: 07
      +1
      By that time "Ustinov" will be out of repair. Here it is to send with a couple of frigates for escort.
  23. Evil 55
    Evil 55 April 3 2016 15: 10
    +1
    I don’t know if it’s worth driving a ship from the Northern Fleet to Mediterranean, which in fact has no seats that are not shot by "Calibers" from the Caspian, Sevastopol or Tartus .. Geyrop is already shaking in a fit at the sight of the St. ...
    1. niksan2002
      niksan2002 April 3 2016 18: 05
      +1
      They must constantly be reminded of their presence, and all the same advertising, any kind of. They are afraid, then respect.
  24. PSih2097
    PSih2097 April 3 2016 21: 48
    -1
    Aircraft cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov will head the Russian naval group in the Mediterranean Sea; on board will be carrier-based aircraft Su-33, Su-25UTG and MiG-29K, the military-industrial complex reports with reference to TASS.

    There is no such ship in the Russian fleet. The author, at least read the wiki before writing.
    There is a Heavy Aircraft Carrier Cruiser (TavKr) "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov".
    It is a pity that there are no "Varyag" and "Ulyanovsk" ... It is a pity crying...
  25. Phosgene
    Phosgene April 3 2016 21: 57
    0
    Turkey has 14 submarines. I hope the command has the intelligence to drive the nuclear submarines to cover the only aircraft carrier in the Russian Federation.
    1. mike_z
      mike_z April 3 2016 22: 43
      0
      According to international rules, boats of a nuclear power plant cannot enter the Mediterranean Sea. But it happened ... I’m silent.
  26. Yugra
    Yugra April 3 2016 23: 10
    0
    It’s a pity that we have only one handsome man ...
  27. Olegi1
    Olegi1 April 4 2016 01: 00
    0
    Quote: mike_z
    According to international rules, boats of a nuclear power plant cannot enter the Mediterranean Sea. But it happened ... I’m silent.


    Can I have a link? Something is not believed, one of my acquaintances, being the commander of the nuclear submarine, even as I drove to Middle-earth under the USSR, told me personally. As there now - I do not know.
    1. mike_z
      mike_z April 4 2016 11: 01
      0
      Quote: Olegi1
      a friend of mine, being a submarine commander

      You are silent about your friend. Don't tease the geese. And about the status of the Mediterranean, delve into the internet, I have no time. The fact that they "stopped by", I know no worse, but I think one case was made public, when our nuclear submarine ripped open our cargo ship with grain "Vozrozhdenie", I don’t remember the year, but it smelled like crazy! But! Then the USSR was! Shut up, how cute. Today all the liberals would pour out tubs of mud.
  28. The comment was deleted.