The leader of China warned about the inadmissibility of actions that violate the sovereignty of the country

Beijing does not accept actions that "under the pretext of freedom of navigation" violate the sovereignty of China and harm its national interests, reports RIA News Statement by country leader Xi Jinping, made in Washington during a conversation with Barack Obama on the sidelines of the summit on nuclear security held there.

China "firmly stands for the protection of peace and stability in the South China Sea, and all disputes should be resolved peacefully through negotiations," said the PRC Chairman.

“China respects and protects the freedom of air navigation and maritime navigation of all countries, based on international law, at the same time does not accept any actions that, under the pretext of freedom of navigation, damage the state sovereignty and security interests of the PRC”,

Jinping added.

He expressed the hope that "the United States will not take anyone’s side in territorial disputes and will play a constructive role in ensuring peace and stability in the region."

Recall that, in the opinion of the Chinese leadership, a number of countries participating in the territorial dispute regarding the islands in the South China Sea, specifically use the support of the United States to escalate tensions.

Comments

[Bureaucrat]

We are for the nose, China for the cf ... ku, educate the bully!

[Kostyar]

Kitayozam svoygo is not necessary, they have enough of someone else .....
But seriously, well done! We will look further at the development of events .....

[Vend]

China is able to figure it out without a mattress presence.

[skrabplus.ru]

Wend (2) RU Today, 11: 07 ↑ New
China is able to figure it out without a mattress presence.
this is the mattress and the egg !!!

[Tatyana]

From the text of the article
According to the Chinese leadership, a number of countries participating in the territorial dispute over islands in the South China Sea specifically use US support to escalate tensions.

On the contrary! It is the United States that incites the war with China and sets on China a number of countries participating in the territorial dispute over the islands in the South China Sea. At the same time, US globalists are creating from these countries for their US foreign policy their ASIAN anti-China, like the colonial-pro-American EU against Russia.

[cniza]

Quote: Bureaucrat

We are for the nose, China for the cf ... ku, educate the bully!

Let them spin, there is still the DPRK sausages them.

[Blondy]

The United States, of course, is inciting (and in some places not), But, China does not need to put a finger in its mouth regarding foreign territories. At one time, I got involved with all the neighbors, though I got it almost everywhere on the nose. And the Chinese sovereign over the Spratly Islands in historical retrospect is somehow hard to see.
Sovereignty, of course, is such a thing that you can declare it yourself and even defend it, but it is equally important whether others recognize it so that no conflicts arise. And even if China considers this matter to be internal, it is not necessary that the United States should think so. And other countries have their own reasons (or appetites) for these islands

Recall that, in the opinion of the Chinese leadership, a number of countries participating in the territorial dispute regarding the islands in the South China Sea, specifically use the support of the United States to escalate tensions.

Here, everyone tries to grab his piece as best he can, to the best of his abilities and capabilities.
Although I have already forgotten the arguments (and I am too lazy to go into the historical and architectural jungle), but for some reason I have long believed that Vietnam still has the most rights to these islands. But again, this is just a matter of "historical justice".

[Altona]

Quote: Blondy

Although I have already forgotten the arguments (and I am too lazy to go into the historical and architectural jungle), but for some reason I have long believed that Vietnam still has the most rights to these islands. But again, this is just a matter of "historical justice".

------------------
It's much easier now, girl. Whoever previously rolled an airstrip on the "island" and placed an air wing with an air defense complex there, then the island. And about "freedom of navigation". This "freedom" is determined by the course passage of the US 6th Fleet and the reach of its weapons. The rest are remnants of the sailing fleet and international maritime law.

[papik09]

Quote: skrabplus.ru

ovitis

Not "test", but - sausage

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Bone

We will look further at the development of events .....

And then there’s nowhere to look. Jinping himself said what will happen next

He expressed the hope that "the United States will not take sides in territorial disputes and will play a constructive role in ensuring peace and stability in the region ”

If it is logical, in accordance with common sense, not to do anything, then the United States will definitely do it. That is, if the common sense of Jinping is given above, US actions will look like this

Contrary to hopes, “the US will take an active part in the territorial conflict on any side and play a key role in the destruction of peace and stability in the region”

How many times ....

[siberalt]

And what, the Chinese can and "blink". Recall their military provocations on the border of the USSR on about. Damansky and in Zhalanshkol (Kaz. SSR). True, then the Americans incited them. Now they themselves need to scratch their turnips.

[Amurets]

Quote: siberalt

And what, the Chinese can and "whip"

Quote: siberalt

True, then the Americans incited them. Now they themselves need to scratch their turnips.

The Americans are already scratching their turnips. Congress is concerned that China is rapidly buying up American IT enterprises. At the beginning of the week, economic news reported that China bought more US enterprises in two and a half months of this year than in all last year. '' Americans combed their turnips and were concerned that soon they would have nothing left.

[Remover]

And why is it on the site?

[vlad66]

Quote: Mate

And why is it on the site?

What would you leave a comment.

[Remover]

Quote: vlad66

Quote: Mate

And why is it on the site?

What would you leave a comment.

Thanks for explaining :)

[ovod84]

Another strain in the South China Sea is ripening

[guzik007]

“China respects and protects the freedom of air navigation and maritime navigation of all countries, based on international law, at the same time does not accept any actions that, under the pretext of freedom of navigation, damage the state sovereignty and security interests of the PRC”,
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
here it is, classical diplomacy. What a language! And how many veiled meanings. Song! Especially against the background of the current skirmish, sometimes turning into an open market and graters of real boys: =))

[Boa kaa]

Quote: guzik007

What a language! And how many veiled meanings. Song!

And in my opinion, you can’t say clearer:

Jinping
expressed hope that "the United States will not take sides in territorial disputes and play a constructive role in ensuring peace and stability in the region."

Translated into the public: "do not meddle in my garden. We will figure it out here ourselves .."
But it seems to me that the United States will support its allies Japan and ROK, and thereby provoke the second "Tonkin Incident." And then they will try to warm their hands on this.
But to us, in addition to moral and military-technical hongfuza support - do not bother with more.

[Barakuda]

According to the Chinese leadership, a number of countries involved in the territorial dispute over the islands in the South China Sea specifically use the support of the United States to escalate tensions.

Who would doubt that..

[Pvi1206]

Russia should support Beijing’s position on non-interference of outside forces in the situation in this region of the planet.

[Oldwiser]

Quote: Pvi1206

Russia should support the position of Beijing

If we support Beijing’s position on the South China Sea, we will complicate relations with Hanoi. No, in the East, the Russian bear is better off not getting into a showdown of dragons.

[Oldwiser]

Quote: Pvi1206

Russia should support the position of Beijing

If we support Beijing’s position on the South China Sea, we will complicate relations with Hanoi. No, in the East, the Russian bear is better off not getting into a showdown of dragons.

[pig killer]

China is surrounded along the sea perimeter by US allies - Japan, Taiwan, plus a group in South Korea, tension with Vietnam, creeping separatism of the northwestern Muslim regions. Russia is the only friendly neighbor of the PRC. IMHO

[dobrik10]

Slowly squeeze a couple of the atolls and of course be sure to declare inadmissibility to assume that he squeezed them out.
And these territories have always been Chinese!

[V.ic]

According to the Chinese leadership, a number of countries involved in the territorial dispute over the islands in the South China Sea specifically use the support of the United States to escalate tensions.

One thousand one hundred and sixtieth Chinese warning to "hegemon". Americans, as always, do not care.

[Bacha]

One thousand one hundred and sixtieth Chinese warning to "hegemon". Americans, as always, do not care.

Yes, and China is somehow violet. The dog barks, the caravan goes on. What mattresses will impose sanctions on them? Well, well))) China is not sitting on oil and gas, it is the largest producer in the world. God is said to have created the world, and the rest is done in China.

[pig killer]

Already not "on the fig", judging by the reaction of the Empire of good.

[atamankko]

China said, but let the US think.

[xam0]

China, slowly and steadily bending its line, only politely warns everyone against trying to put pressure on it. Such creeping diplomacy will still succeed.

[drilled]

"China sleeps ... Let it sleep further. God forbid us all if China wakes up ..." (Napoleon)

[Strezhevchanin]

Recently, the US reminds me of a hulk. A big star-striped guy who somehow damn shatters everything in the neighborhood and when he speaks; hulk excluded, hulk can !!! The question of why does the whole world disappear .....

[koshmarik]

I'm talking about something else. I am surprised by the passivity of China in the events in the Middle East. It delves into itself in the coastal zone and even though the grass does not grow.

[PalSanych]

They crush Africa with a glanders !!!

[PalSanych]

They crush Africa with a glanders !!!

[Wheel]

Quote: koshmarik

I'm talking about something else. I am surprised by the passivity of China in the events in the Middle East. It delves into itself in the coastal zone and even though the grass does not grow.

Why is China an extra headache?

[pts-m]

Pendos should not tease the dragon. They play it out, and Pendos dohlyary will burn in the flame with an erupted hit.

[Corsair5912]

China is a great ancient country, and all sorts of arrogant Saxons are one-day. For thousands of years, many such folk as the arrogant Saxons climbed out, parasitized, dirty, boasted of power, fell into insignificance and disappeared without a trace.
China has nowhere to rush, it can wait for the collapse of the West, where dominance is dominant.

[Sergei64]

Quote: Corsair5912

China is a great ancient country, and all sorts of arrogant Saxons are one-day. For thousands of years, many such folk as the arrogant Saxons climbed out, parasitized, dirty, boasted of power, fell into insignificance and disappeared without a trace.
China has nowhere to rush, it can wait for the collapse of the West, where dominance is dominant.

I thought the same thing, after reading the article, they wouldn’t have enough gunpowder to control the serpent.

[mr.grin19z]

everywhere you gash your sting wherever a beak breaks

[el-nino]

The Great Game of China against the United States begins. Place of protestation: the whole World ...

G2 we will be all ...