Military Review

This year, China may adopt the new Dongfeng 41 ICBM.

43
The latest Chinese ballistic missile "Dongfeng 41" (DF-41), capable of reaching any point in the United States, can be adopted by the PLA this year, reports TASS a message from the magazine Canva Effect Defense.




"Tests of the rocket entered the final stage," - notes the publication.

“Dongfeng 41 will initially be deployed in the new strategic missile military unit of the People’s Liberation Army of China (PLA) in Xinyang district in the central province of Henan,” the magazine says.

"Having a range of flight to 14,5 thousand km, it will be able to reach the US from there within half an hour if it flies through the North Pole, or it takes a little longer if the trajectory lies through the Pacific Ocean," the article says.

Meanwhile, it is not yet clear to the experts whether “the new Chinese solid-fuel rocket will be able to overcome the multi-level missile defense system deployed by the United States in the Asia-Pacific region,” the newspaper writes.

According to Professor He Tsisun from Shanghai, quoted by the South China Morning Post, published in Hong Kong, “the maximum flight range of the DF-41 is almost 15 thousand km. However, within a few minutes after the launch of the ICBM, it can be blocked by the US missile defense system on the island of Guam. ”

It is noted that rocket tests from the summer of 2015-th are held in the area of ​​the Taiyuan cosmodrome in northern China.

Andrei Chan, editor-in-chief of Kanva Emergency Defense magazine, explained that “the accuracy of the DF-41 will increase in 2020, when China fully deploys its own global navigation satellite system, Beidou.”
Photos used:
https://cont.ws
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 30 March 2016 16: 40
    -14%
    Great rocket. Allies, however.
    1. Observer2014
      Observer2014 30 March 2016 16: 43
      +1
      This year, China may adopt the new Dongfeng 41 ICBM.
      Something in the photo of course reminds me. Only painfully healthy and fat through too much? Although the Chinese comrades are still those with a savvy.
      1. Eugene-Eugene
        Eugene-Eugene 30 March 2016 17: 10
        +3
        The Chinese probably also say that their new products have no analogues in the world.
        1. crazyrom
          crazyrom 31 March 2016 03: 36
          +1
          what a small car they have for such a big rocket!
      2. Voha_krim
        Voha_krim 30 March 2016 18: 00
        +1
        Quote: Observer2014
        Only painfully healthy and fat over the top?

        Compared to a vehicle, yes. But here "Topol-M" and "Yars" are placed on 8-axle vehicles and the rocket from the crown to the nozzle lies completely on the platform, and in the photo there is a 6-axle "miracle-yudo", and, accordingly, the ground pressure more. But maybe they don't need it due to the lack of "directions", but the presence of roads.
      3. guzik007
        guzik007 30 March 2016 18: 13
        +3
        Only painfully healthy and fat over the top
        -----------------------------------------
        In terms of miniaturization and compactness, they still have seven versts in the forest with cancer: =)
        1. Bayonet
          Bayonet 30 March 2016 22: 54
          0
          Quote: guzik007
          In terms of miniaturization and compactness, they still have seven versts in the forest with cancer: =)

          What about range? 15000 km. it's wow! If so then ...
          At Poplar – m and Yars - 11000 km.
          1. zennon
            zennon 30 March 2016 23: 33
            0
            Quote: Bayonet
            What about range? 15000 km. it's wow! If so then ...

            Fake golimy! Solid fuel with such a range is not real. Look who communicates such passions! There is only one Hong Kong newspaper. What kind of "analysts" ?! The rank-and-file fills his own worth. Well, like Khrushchev at parades drove something out of the ordinary on Red Square, which was never in service.
            Under Khrushchev and Brezhnev, huge anti-aircraft missiles were transported along Red Square, which Soviet television announcers, commenting on the passage of troops and equipment through the cheat sheet approved by the Central Committee of the CPSU, proudly called “distant unmanned interceptors”. That sounds! In fact, these were just mock-ups of missiles of the Dal anti-aircraft complex, which had never been brought to mind. The fake was a kind of hint to the Americans: they say, the Soviet Union became the owner of the next "miracle weapon".
            The same can be said about the GR-1 experimental global missiles, which, as conceived by their creators, were to launch an Earth satellite orbiting the Earth’s orbit, capable of "falling" from space directly, say, to the White House at the right time, so much so that its owners simply would not have time to deploy their missile defense. Before the production of the GR-1, the matter never came to pass, but a couple of these gigantic “cigars” were rolled for several years along the First See on November 7, keeping our “sworn friends” in good shape. A similar task in the Moscow parades was carried out by the experimental strategic missiles RT-15 and RT-20 on self-propelled caterpillar launchers.
      4. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 30 March 2016 23: 12
        0
        Quote: Observer2014
        Something in the photo of course reminds me. Only painfully healthy and fat through too much? Although the Chinese comrades are still those with a savvy.

        Yeah, the Soviet joke was remembered about a Chinese space rocket with stokers on board!
        Although the quote confused:
        Having a flight range of up to 14,5 thousand km

        How much was printed here and in other sources of the Network, neither the Americans nor the USSR had ballistic missiles with such a range! Orbiting-satellite systems do not count.
    2. Michael67
      Michael67 30 March 2016 16: 46
      +11
      Yeah. Especially if, God forbid, they launch it through the north pole. Those. she will fly to Omerigu from the Russian Federation. The psi will have an option to declare that she flew from the Russian Federation. I'm kidding, of course. From launch to ... everything is recorded. But still. For "partners" it is in the order of things to call black white and vice versa.
      1. gas113
        gas113 30 March 2016 16: 51
        +2
        I think if hi from China flies then from us too. If it smells somewhere, then there will be no time to understand.
        1. kamski
          kamski 30 March 2016 17: 41
          +3
          I agree to stand it is no longer necessary to launch our own, too, towards our "STRATEGIC" US allies
        2. Bayonet
          Bayonet 30 March 2016 22: 58
          +1
          Quote: gas113
          e. If somewhere it smells then time will not be sorted.

          And we all seem to never mind! Maybe someone who lives somewhere in the taiga will also last some time ...
      2. kamski
        kamski 30 March 2016 17: 39
        +2
        If this thing is launched in the USA then it doesn’t matter who and what will say
  2. Trigger-Happy
    Trigger-Happy 30 March 2016 16: 45
    -1
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    Allies, however.

    Here the USSR helped them in the struggle against Japan, but they do not remember us helping so seriously. We now have allies, except, perhaps, countries participating in the CSTO.
    1. Michael67
      Michael67 30 March 2016 16: 48
      +10
      We had allies, are and will be only the ARMY AND Navy!
  3. gas113
    gas113 30 March 2016 16: 46
    +4
    It confuses that accuracy will be enhanced by navigation systems. Surely satellites and radars are the first target in a mess. What I mean is that delivery vehicles should have autonomous guidance.
    1. Michael67
      Michael67 30 March 2016 16: 51
      +2
      Offline guidance should be present.
      Our stars have orientation. (not a joke).
      1. adept666
        adept666 30 March 2016 18: 01
        +3
        Our stars have orientation. (not a joke).
        astro correction not only among ours, but also among Americans.
        1. sandrmur76
          sandrmur76 30 March 2016 18: 39
          +1
          And the Chinese Taikanauts will be sent to orient wassat
    2. Observer2014
      Observer2014 30 March 2016 16: 51
      +4
      "gas113 (1) US Today, 16:46 PM New
      It is embarrassing that the accuracy will be improved by navigation systems. Satellites and radars are probably the first target in a mess "
      And then! I won’t be surprised if several satellites are right now full of steel balls circling the earth. And on command, an hour x once and for about 200 years nothing will fly up
    3. Yasha Gypsy
      Yasha Gypsy 30 March 2016 17: 03
      +2
      This is normal, they will finalize it. Not quality, so quantity will be taken. On the other hand, the Americans do not have enough interceptor missiles for all. And besides this, our "non-brothers-Ukrainians", on the sly from the Amers, "pushed" the Chinese documentation on the missiles we have eliminated (according to START) from the Molodets railway complex (BZHRK). They were also produced at Urkain, so soon the Chinese will have their own BZHRK. I think the Yankees will not be very happy with this and I doubt that they will say thanks to the ukram.
  4. drilled
    drilled 30 March 2016 16: 55
    +5
    Something I remember is only one successful test of pindoPRO, and for a predetermined target. Everything else flew anywhere. So what about "blocked" got excited
  5. demiurg
    demiurg 30 March 2016 16: 56
    +1
    Nobody will write a petition to the UN Security Council that China is clearly developing a missile capable of carrying nuclear weapons?
    If I understood correctly, is it the same MBR as the new one on submarines with an increased first stage? By the way, she has 10 BBs, richer than Yars, with the worst quo. But I did not find all the other data.
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus 30 March 2016 17: 50
      0
      Quote: demiurg
      If I understood correctly, is it the same MBR as the new one on submarines with an increased first stage?

      No, this is the previous version of the DF-31.
  6. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 30 March 2016 17: 00
    +1
    And the chassis of this ICBM MZKT?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 30 March 2016 17: 11
      +6
      In the photo, in general, the chassis with a container for the missile defense A 135 - 51T6
  7. demiurg
    demiurg 30 March 2016 17: 04
    +1
    Quote: Primus Pilus
    And the chassis of this ICBM MZKT?

    His honestly copied. There are only six axes; everything weighs one hundred tons, if not more. It can only ride on asphalt, and on hard ground.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 30 March 2016 18: 20
      0
      They are already making their platforms for ICBMs.
  8. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 30 March 2016 17: 39
    +2
    For some reason, no one says that these missiles can hit anywhere in Russia.
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus 30 March 2016 17: 52
      +2
      Quote: VohaAhov
      For some reason, no one says that these missiles can hit anywhere in Russia.

      This is a missile specifically against the United States, for Russia there are other missiles there.
      1. Prisoner
        Prisoner 30 March 2016 18: 11
        0
        laughing With consumer goods?
        1. Odysseus
          Odysseus 30 March 2016 18: 26
          0
          Quote: Captive
          With consumer goods?

          With consumer goods there are not rockets, but whole starships smile
    2. Avantageur
      Avantageur 30 March 2016 18: 30
      +2
      Quote: VohaAhov
      For some reason, no one says that these missiles can hit anywhere in Russia.

      They’re afraid to get it ...


  9. Vadim237
    Vadim237 30 March 2016 18: 26
    +1
    Soon, China and the new fourth-generation nuclear submarine - Tour 098, will begin to build.
  10. darksoul
    darksoul 30 March 2016 19: 17
    0
    a huge copy machine works at 100% ....... at least one thing at least would have been invented by everyone in the world ..... I don’t understand they only steal technology and know how to copy ... well, at least there should be one
    1. BABA SHURA
      BABA SHURA 30 March 2016 22: 49
      0
      Arims are not creatures and never invented anything. They are performers. If people invented before, and now invents. A people cannot breathe out creatively if there is a creator in it, at the level of the mentality.
  11. Old26
    Old26 30 March 2016 20: 54
    0
    Quote: Michael67
    Offline guidance should be present.

    but it is
  12. demiurg
    demiurg 30 March 2016 21: 02
    +1
    Quote: darksoul
    a huge copy machine works at 100% ....... at least one thing at least would have been invented by everyone in the world ..... I don’t understand they only steal technology and know how to copy ... well, at least there should be one

    The Japanese in the 50s also began with copying. Koreans copied from the Japanese in 70-80. the next generation, after a maximum of one, and they will have hereditary engineers. And 1.5-2 billion people.
  13. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander 30 March 2016 22: 17
    +3
    ICBMs may be blocked by the US missile defense system on the island of Guam


    Over Guam, the warhead will fly at an altitude of about 8-9 thousand km. at a speed of 5-6 km / sec. And by what means can this warhead be "blocked"? It looks like "eksperD" here is something "eksperdanul". Little.
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 30 March 2016 23: 07
      0
      Quote: Former battalion commander

      Over Guam, the warhead will fly at an altitude of about 8-9 thousand km.

      As a rule, the height of the ICBM trajectories does not exceed 1300 km. hi
  14. mik6403
    mik6403 30 March 2016 23: 43
    +1
    Where will these missiles be aimed ... that's another question ... ???
  15. Evil 55
    Evil 55 31 March 2016 03: 03
    +1
    Instead of the Dunfun, the Chinese plan to put into service the DunObam missiles against the United States, DunBrit-Britain, DunKang-Canada, and DunVon missiles against Zhopania ..
  16. Nelepost
    Nelepost 31 March 2016 07: 30
    0
    The photographs at the beginning of the article on Voenny Obozreniye cannot be trusted at all. Constantly the photo does not fight with the article :). It seems that whoever censors incoming articles, for the sake of picola, constantly replaces the photo, well, the authors who write all this cannot put left photos: /