Military Review

London responded to the UN decision to expand the territorial waters of Argentina, which now also includes the Falkland Islands (Malvinas)

116
The United Nations actually recognized the Malvinas (Falkland) Islands beyond Argentina. This took place as a result of granting Argentina the right to extend Argentina’s territorial waters from 200 miles to 350 miles. It is in this zone that the Malvinas (Falkland) Islands are located.


London responded to the UN decision to expand the territorial waters of Argentina, which now also includes the Falkland Islands (Malvinas)


In 1997, Buenos Aires began to collect the necessary evidence of ownership of the Argentina continental shelf. After 9 years, all data was collected and transferred to the UN. It took the United Nations another 10 years to recognize the continental shelf beyond Argentina, and to include the Malvinas (Falkland) Islands in the zone of the territorial waters of this state.

In London, have already commented on the decision taken today at the UN. The British authorities noted that the decision of the special UN commission, associated with the expansion of the territorial waters of Argentina, "does not affect the fact that the Falkland Islands are part of the UK." With this british The Guardian published a material in which it says that the residents of Falkland are "concerned about the territorial claims of Argentina." It is also reported that the local Falkland authorities (and de facto the Falklands annexed by Britain from Argentina) sent a letter to London asking them to explain how to be in connection with the decision of the UN commission.
Photos used:
http://www.theguardian.com
116 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. GSVG 86-88
    GSVG 86-88 29 March 2016 19: 45
    +46
    So Anglo-Saxons on the nose!
    1. asadov
      asadov 29 March 2016 19: 49
      +21
      most likely a little below the belt .. Let's see what Old England will do.
      1. Pravdarm
        Pravdarm 29 March 2016 19: 55
        +29
        Argentines: "THE MALVINS ARE OUR"! soldier
        Return to their home harbor! laughing
        drinks good
        1. ruAlex
          ruAlex 29 March 2016 22: 45
          +3
          So much for the annexation of the gentlemen of the arrogant Saxons laughing
        2. Zoldat_A
          Zoldat_A 29 March 2016 23: 06
          +6
          Quote: Pravdarm
          Argentines: "THE MALVINS ARE OUR"! soldier
          Return to their home harbor! laughing
          drinks good

          He worried about Argentina as his relatives, when they fought for them with small britis. good drinks

          And at the same time a call to the entire "democratic world" from the UN. Like, run smaller paws themselves, God knows where - it will be easier for you to live. "Either take off the cross, or put on your panties." And then, by the way, there is talk of dividing Antarctica, so small-shaven climb there, like we have with Gorbat for beer ...
          1. atakan
            atakan 30 March 2016 00: 15
            +12
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            And at the same time a call to the entire "democratic world" from the UN.

            What does the UN really have to do with it?
            I see most are not up to date on the topic.
            This is a personal reverence for Obama Argentina, a splash for the Naguls, and an exacerbation of tension in the region.)
            Plus they scored a couple of small birds with one stone.
            1. Zoldat_A
              Zoldat_A 30 March 2016 05: 27
              +4
              Quote: atakan
              What does the UN really have to do with it?
              I see most are not up to date on the topic.
              This is a personal reverence from Obama Argentina, a splash for the Naguls, and an exacerbation of tension in the region

              Well, the UN decided. But the Americans still at least MAKE THE APPEARANCE that they respect the decisions of the UN.

              It is clear that the UN has long become a pocket office under the US State Department, but if Obama has decided to flop down the shallow-shaven SO much, then here is "Obama's cunning plan."

              Although the small-shavens are unlikely to aggravate the situation - well, they will not fight again the territory that the UN has recognized as a sovereign part of Argentina! But what about democracy and world peace, under the guise of which the Naglo-Saxons have been shedding blood all over the world for 250 years? Rather, they will start some kind of "zhydnost" revolution and show the whole world how dictatorial and undemocratic Argentina will crush it.
              1. atakan
                atakan 30 March 2016 15: 23
                +1
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                It is clear that the UN has long become a pocket office under the US State Department

                This is the worst part in this article.
                Just sadness for all of us.
              2. shuhartred
                shuhartred 30 March 2016 16: 00
                +2
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                Well, the UN decided

                And what does the UN have to do with it? If something is decided there, so what? Let them hold a referendum among the inhabitants of the islands, as they decide it will be so, all by analogy with the Crimea. But if the results are recognized, then we will have a magnificent trump card.
      2. Kasym
        Kasym 29 March 2016 20: 38
        +5
        asadov. Good evening. There was an article on the VO about the dirty construction of two aircraft carriers in England (Elizabeth and ...) in 17 and 19 ... That's why the British are in a hurry - they knew that the issue was being discussed at the UN. hi
      3. zao74
        zao74 29 March 2016 20: 48
        +9
        Let's see what Old England will do.
        They will send the UN to a known address and all matters.
      4. Volgobalt
        Volgobalt 29 March 2016 22: 32
        +3
        No, it's just horseradish on a blunt forehead !!!))) Let's see what happens next? Again Anglo - Argentine war?
      5. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 30 March 2016 03: 59
        +2
        Quote: asadov
        The decision of the special UN commission related to the expansion of the territorial waters of Argentina, “does not affect the fact that the Falkland Islands are part of the UK”

        "... the decision of a special UN commission related to the expansion of Argentina's territorial waters" does not in any way affect the fact that the Falkland Islands are part of Great Britain "
        All this is true, but ... Malvins will be Argentine in 10 or 20 years. The moment will be chosen, certificates will be collected and pinned. And given the fact that the United States run the United States, a symptom however.
      6. Wiruz
        Wiruz April 1 2016 00: 23
        +1
        that the decision of the special UN commission related to the expansion of the territorial waters of Argentina, "does not affect the fact that the Falkland Islands are part of the UK"

        Oh, and these impudent Anglo-Saxons. They turn the UN in a famous place and at least henna. Why are they so clinging to these islands? bully
      7. OlegLex
        OlegLex April 1 2016 17: 56
        0
        Yes, he will not do anything, for a long time the UN does not weigh anything. Remember the conclusion of the UN commission regarding Asange, they did not care and rubbed. It will be the same here.
    2. Kostyar
      Kostyar 29 March 2016 19: 51
      -4
      The Anglo-Saxon stumble under the shonar has begun, there will be more further !!!

      py.sy .: Roosters place at the bucket .... !!!
      1. Gorodovik
        Gorodovik 29 March 2016 20: 34
        +18
        Let's be respectful and we will not use this under-lexicon anymore7 This is really annoying. And it puts you on the wrong side.
      2. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 29 March 2016 21: 55
        +4
        Quote: Bone
        Roosters place at the bucket .... !!!


        Why are they bouncing around so much, this empire over which the sun did not set? These ghouls who robbed India-Pakistan, America, Africa, the Middle East? Now savages came to them with serious questions - like, this, but where is our heritage, why did you slow down our development? Answer, Britain. The savages are in brackets, but the question of civilization excites me - how can such miserables try to steer the world after everything that they have done (and America in this matter is only a derivative of England, it will answer for Indian civilization when the time comes, as well as the Spanish and Portuguese for South America). But if you use sports terms, they are dead, not nyfig styer, fatty steel. Eat yes shri, the whole philosophy, they also try to steam this garbage to us for export. Here is E2-E4, well, it will not work with them. They don’t even understand what they’ve done, but will answer in full. And I don’t feel sorry for them when the cities start to burn, and when their savages will be cut, let them go, scum. And those who have itchy hands of friendship itching to help Brussels - calm down, scratch the iron curtain, enough to be good-natured-loshars. Dot .
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain 29 March 2016 19: 52
      +8
      We got the Anglo-Saxons on a brazen nose at the UN, now let's see how Washington's doggies respond. request
    4. Observer2014
      Observer2014 29 March 2016 19: 52
      +7
      "GSVG 86-88 RU
      That's how the Anglo-Saxons are on the nose! "
      These Anglo-Saxons are no longer diarrhea for them, but they should be kicked on the face with their feet.
      I read somewhere that ours like Argentina are su24 bu. We were going to lease. Piece 25. I would even give a hundred "Brahmos" to Argentina.
      I want to add. Why boo and rent. Because Argentina finances sing romances. But you can give aircraft loans for such a thing.
      1. opus
        opus 29 March 2016 20: 47
        +5
        Quote: Observer2014
        I read somewhere that ours like Argentina are su24 bu. Going to rent to give

        no.

        These were rumors about the sale of twelve Russian Su-24 fighter-bombers

        So far they have from us: Russian high-quality and inexpensive Mi-8 helicopters (in the export version of the Mi-171E)

        and sea tugs of the Neftegaz class


        The Air Force is dead:


        six Mirage III, four Mirage 5 and four copies of the Israeli modernization Mirage 5 - IAI Neshe, etc. on trifles

        and in 2016, the UK should replace its obsolete air defense systems (Rapier air defense systems) with more modern air defense systems CAMM (FLAADS) and Patriot BMC4I




        2,5 billion PESOS for 2015 ... you won’t run too much.
        Turnover with us, at the level of 1,5-2 billion $ per year ...


        They would have 10 pieces of pr. 877EKM Halibut ...
      2. Yak-3P
        Yak-3P 29 March 2016 21: 07
        0
        25 rooks are already there ... in the summer they sent ... with service ...
        1. opus
          opus 29 March 2016 21: 15
          +2
          Quote: Yak-3P
          25 rooks are already there ... in the summer they sent ... with service ...

          No, these are rumors, and winters of 2014.
          hence


          Britain did not even increase the Typhoon group

          what "rooks" are there?
    5. GSH-18
      GSH-18 29 March 2016 19: 54
      +2
      London responded to the UN decision to expand the territorial waters of Argentina, which now also includes the Falkland Islands (Malvinas)

      Such a response is already like a dead poultice. Poznyak rush gentlemen naglosaksa lol
      A flag in the picture is cool lol
      1. Mintai
        Mintai 29 March 2016 19: 58
        +1
        Spit naglosaksam ... They only understand the power! Here Russia Crimea legally took away (without firing a shot) ... This is our territory and watered with blood!
    6. donavi49
      donavi49 29 March 2016 19: 56
      +16
      London will ignore - this is not a binding decision.

      Actually, they are already pushing for it:
      A spokesman for the British Prime Minister said that the government has not yet reviewed the document, emphasizing that this commission is an advisory body.

      And Argentina now completely collapsed militarily. That is, if tomorrow is a war, they will fight on the technique of the Falkland era with minimal modernization.

      In the Navy, their 4 destroyers fell apart (the engines died, there was no money for repairs). 2-3 Esporas are alive through the cannibalism of 6. But it’s the Suicide bombers they have air defense - MANPADS and 40mm Bofos. 2 old submarines - not the fact that on the go. And that’s all. The rest are patrolmen and transports.

      In the Air Force all the same 10 SuperEntendants, only in a state Allah knows how it flies. 20 A-4 - all that remains of more than a hundred A-4 in 80's. 20 own Pamps, which have been constantly hanging at the plant for years, because the Air Force has no money for redemption. 30 Pukar, which only drug dealers drive.
      1. Botanologist
        Botanologist 29 March 2016 20: 46
        +9
        Quote: donavi49
        That is, if tomorrow is a war, they will fight on the technique of the Falkland era with minimal modernization

        In addition to the untimely deceased General Belgrano, even during the time of the Falklands crying there was nothing to frighten England. The maximum air wing during the attack was, EMNIP, 4 aircraft. With half not exploded Exozet.
        Until they accumulate at C-400 and Ball or Bastion, they may not remember about the islands.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    7. gergi
      gergi 29 March 2016 20: 42
      +2
      Acid to collect manat and fall into their shaving. Jackals.
    8. 13 warrior
      13 warrior 29 March 2016 20: 55
      +1
      The UN poured British pepper under the tail - an oxymoron!
      But how funny and nice!))
    9. vodolaz
      vodolaz 29 March 2016 21: 06
      +2
      What good news)))
    10. Altona
      Altona 29 March 2016 22: 48
      +4
      Quote: GSVG 86-88
      So Anglo-Saxons on the nose!

      ------------------
      Translated into an understandable, public language: "Your heaps of rubble, water and shelf-Argentine!" laughing
  2. akims
    akims 29 March 2016 19: 49
    +4
    Arms to Argentina!
    Extremely defensive of course!
  3. Berserks
    Berserks 29 March 2016 19: 50
    0
    Can agrentinsky muzhachos su-30 offer?
    1. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 29 March 2016 20: 09
      +3
      Quote: akims
      Arms to Argentina!
      Extremely defensive of course!

      Quote: Berserks
      Can agrentinsky muzhachos su-30 offer?

      Just no gifts! What do they have there besides meat of cattle and football players?
      1. Dym71
        Dym71 29 March 2016 20: 24
        +5
        Quote: Barkhan
        What do they have there besides cattle meat and football players?


        Port in Buenos Aires.
      2. sdc_alex
        sdc_alex 29 March 2016 20: 26
        +6
        Well, in principle, you can and the players, also for rent wink
        1. BARKHAN
          BARKHAN 29 March 2016 22: 34
          +2
          Quote: sdc_alex
          can and footballers

          And they will not become sluggish in our frost, like flies in October?
        2. tomatokin
          tomatokin 29 March 2016 22: 43
          +1
          nah football players !!! stop Current areas for football, hockey, water polo, aerospace and naval sports !!! laughing It really hurts the place and the climate is more or less suitable for entogo ... winked
      3. yehat
        yehat 31 March 2016 17: 26
        0
        valuable wood species (for decoration and furniture), some cx cultures
    2. Winnie76
      Winnie76 29 March 2016 22: 10
      +1
      Club-k let them take it. There are no new ships on the Su-30 - they will cost container ships. They haven’t tested it in Syria, maybe we can check it in the British ...
    3. tomatokin
      tomatokin 29 March 2016 22: 35
      +2
      Mozhnos finnos. But amigas nemas pesos, eskudos, dolaros ... shorter nemas kapustos !!! stop repeat fellow
      1. yehat
        yehat 31 March 2016 17: 28
        +1
        You can trade barter. dry cargo banana for 1 modern RCC
    4. Ezhaak
      Ezhaak 30 March 2016 11: 39
      +1
      Quote: Berserks
      Can agrentinsky muzhachos su-30 offer?

      Yes, you will offer a lot more money. And irrevocably. That's what they need.
  4. avvg
    avvg 29 March 2016 19: 50
    +2
    Is it possible that the UN did not support the Anglo-Saxons? Apparently, the United Nations explained to the "Little Britons" that the Malvinas Islands are located on another continent.
    1. max702
      max702 29 March 2016 21: 51
      +1
      Quote: avvg
      Is it possible that the UN did not support the Anglo-Saxons? Apparently, the United Nations explained to the "Little Britons" that the Malvinas Islands are located on another continent.

      Slowly and set fire to South America ...
  5. Lanista
    Lanista 29 March 2016 19: 51
    +1
    Stocked up with popcorn, betting ...
  6. vanavatny
    vanavatny 29 March 2016 19: 56
    0
    no one tell me? Now, after the article and before the comments, some idiotic news appeared in my mind, what is it and how to fight it? sorry that is not the topic hi
    1. Roman 11
      Roman 11 29 March 2016 20: 27
      +1
      Quote: vanavate
      now I have after the article and before comments some kind of idiotic news appeared

      It was like this hi
    2. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental 29 March 2016 20: 30
      +2
      There are glitches here .. somehow I couldn’t write comments for a week (sends them, but doesn’t write from someone ...
  7. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 29 March 2016 19: 58
    +1
    2016 is not 1982, and the authorities in both countries are slightly different. Maybe the British will have at least some kind of business instead of:
    a) constantly we pig for any reason and without reason;
    b) periodically nightmare the EU with exit threats, bargaining for preferences;
    c) to panic about the Russian threat from land, air, water, and from under the ground too (also, by the way, for the sake of money);
    d) cuddle with obvious potential enemies, which already their soldiers have seen the Bosko in the streets;
    e) incessantly produce their scientists who are engaged in crap (although the last point can be omitted, let them fool further, they are harmless).
  8. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 29 March 2016 20: 14
    +3
    It would be good to assist Argentina in resolving this issue.
    Colonial times are a thing of the past ...
    1. sdc_alex
      sdc_alex 29 March 2016 20: 38
      0
      As there: "At the request of the Argentine government to provide military assistance in the fight against colonial invaders and at the request of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin, the Federation Council unanimously decided to approve the deployment of a limited contingent of the Russian Aerospace Forces on the territory of the fraternal Argentine Republic!" fellow

      PS science fiction of course, but it’s interesting how the Naglosaxon assemblage would react to IT?
      1. yehat
        yehat 31 March 2016 17: 32
        +2
        Why do we need a contingent stay in Argentina? what did we forget there, except for trade? I understand the meaning of the base, say, in Venezuela - there you can control the shipping of the entire region, you can put a radio intelligence station and a base for ships. You can buy high-octane fuel. You can participate in supporting the construction of the second channel instead of Panama.
        and what to do in Argentina? From Brazil and Chile to defend ??? Or from the penguin invasion?
        It is possible to organize support for our fishing fleet there, but again, a military contingent is not needed for this, although a desirable universal base with a small fleet, an airfield and a response group is needed. There are prospects for a floating spaceport.
  9. demiurg
    demiurg 29 March 2016 20: 17
    +12
    Right now Argentina does not need a war. If at the age of 80 they had a chance and did not use it, now they don’t have a half chance. Neither the navy nor the air force. And the British have new destroyers and frigates, and an aircraft carrier on the way. And the garrison on the islands, and airfields, which are none but there.
    So this resolution provokes Argentina. They need a lot of money for rearmament, something like we did in 2000. Then they told us everything they wanted, they laughed at the words of the Darkest when he promised to wet it in the outhouses. And now, having pressed his ass in a handful with a polite smile, they are skating to put questions to Moscow. South Americans need three things: money (a lot), time 10-12 years, and GDP (fix knows where they will find the second one).
    1. max702
      max702 29 March 2016 22: 03
      +2
      You are right, that’s exactly how they are trying to take Argentina weakly. Today they have no chance at all from the word .. If then the USSR and the USA agreed that they would not climb .. then today the USA does not interfere with playing along at the right time, and England itself can handle it ..But the islands, the territory of the state island that is part of NATO will not be alarmed about this because there is no one to risk anyone to intervene for Argentina ..
      1. yehat
        yehat 31 March 2016 17: 39
        +1
        England will soon have 2 modern aircraft carriers in service. Do not forget about this.
    2. Winnie76
      Winnie76 29 March 2016 22: 21
      +1
      Of course it is sad. We would have to experience Zircons. And the target does not have to splurge. Crazy about Daring - and we are well and pleased with Argentina fellow
  10. X Y Z
    X Y Z 29 March 2016 20: 19
    +2
    It is also reported that the local Falkland authorities (and de facto the Falklands were annexed by Britain from Argentina) sent a letter to London asking them to explain how to deal with the decision of the UN commission.


    Why is it incomprehensible? Suitcase Station London!
  11. izya top
    izya top 29 March 2016 20: 20
    +7
    the worst thing in this case is that the decisions of this commission are advisory and not binding. And certainly, three permanent members from the UN Security Council will be opposed to a meeting on this issue. So Churkin will only be constantly dipping his Britons with his nose. spoil their nerves
    1. sdc_alex
      sdc_alex 29 March 2016 20: 45
      +1
      As the history of recent years shows: all the UN is already recommendatory in nature! Forgot the devils how and why it was created !!!
  12. Roman 11
    Roman 11 29 March 2016 20: 24
    +2
    But this is interesting! Argentina is our potential ally. The Falklands theme will be heated more, our supplies of military equipment to Argentina will be stronger !!
    1. Pinkie F.
      Pinkie F. 29 March 2016 21: 13
      +1
      Quote: Novel 11
      But this is interesting! Argentina is our potential ally. The Falklands theme will be heated more, our supplies of military equipment to Argentina will be stronger !!

      brilliant!
      Sorry -
      1. and at whose expense, why the fuck?
      2. about the "ally" in more detail - no?
      3. "strong supplies of military equipment" is ...
      1. Roman 11
        Roman 11 29 March 2016 22: 27
        +1
        Quote: Pinky F.
        Sorry -
        1. and at whose expense, why the fuck?
        2. about the "ally" in more detail - no?
        3. "strong supplies of military equipment" is ...

        What the fuck is this?

        Argentinean .....
        2. A purely personal, modest view - the UN thereby provided legitimacy to the demands of the Argentines ..... What else to add, well, there they may receive an additional incentive, inspiration, after such a decision, which may entail searches in support of this difficult path. Who will they seek this support from? Question ...... But it is doubtful that in the West, it is unlikely that among the neutrals like Africans or there are any Ostrava. A third party is seen as possible - countries that are not directly in confrontation with the West, but are still arguing and diverging in many matters ....... all the more so for Russia as a prince with the return of the disputed territory and generally an individual view of international politics. Whether they will grit their teeth alone and for nothing, or cling to the side of the countries - we, China, Iran, Syria, + + to give our position more weight, it is up to them to decide! If they want their international weight to increase (this is possible only as part of an UNSUPPORTED alliance, as we have with China, I think), then it will be necessary to somehow reinforce it financially, technically, etc. - all sorts of contracts for the supply of equipment, technologies and other cooperation will begin. There is confidence that this is their most effective way, so together we all have more opportunities, in all sectors, including dealing with financial markets ...... we have a larger population, also +, the West has shown everyone how merciless with their policies, therefore it is better to stick together, to those who are not with him ..... And Argentina after 1982 does not seem to be with him if he wants the Falklands to return.

        The third paragraph in the second.
  13. Holsten
    Holsten 29 March 2016 20: 31
    +2
    The main thing in the situation is a change in trend. It turns out that both the Angles and the Saxons can begin to nibble on tender places and spit on their shoes. Let them get used to it.
    1. Pinkie F.
      Pinkie F. 29 March 2016 21: 39
      0
      Quote: Holsten
      It turns out that both the Angles and the Saxons can begin to nibble on tender places and spit on their shoes.

      interesting behavior - either mongrels, or homeless people.
      Quote: Holsten
      The main thing in the situation is a change in trend.

      what trend? Before substituting the ass for the States, the new president decided to walk on the strings "Argentinean Aga to the people"It's a fucking trend.
  14. Every
    Every 29 March 2016 20: 32
    +1
    Quote: iza top
    the worst thing in this case is that the decisions of this commission are advisory and not binding. And certainly, three permanent members from the UN Security Council will be opposed to a meeting on this issue. So Churkin will only be constantly dipping his Britons with his nose. spoil their nerves


    I totally agree. There is not much sense from such a decision, but there was a reason to poke these snobs with their noses, otherwise they go after Crimea most of all, after Ukraine.

    P / S: (off topic) so what with the flag, where is the tricolor?
  15. engineer74
    engineer74 29 March 2016 20: 49
    +4
    Toko circus begins! wassat
    EMNIP, in the 90s the Britons held a referendum there, 80-90 percent voted for England!
    Now let them try to refer to the results of this referendum! laughing
    How will they delimit it with Crimea? lol
    I feel, neighing !!! good
    1. yehat
      yehat 31 March 2016 17: 46
      +1
      what is the point of voting if they carried out ethnic cleansing?
      there the British or from their world live, there are few locals.
  16. Vladislav 73
    Vladislav 73 29 March 2016 20: 52
    +2
    Yes, the Anglicos wanted to spit on all UN decisions, at least recommendatory, even mandatory .... What, haven’t they bombed anyone bypassing the UN? belay And what, to whom was it? belay I don’t understand the euphoria prevailing here in VO, like, the answer came to them, for the Crimea, for the sanctions ... requestIt has long been understood that the UN and other international institutions are either dancing to the tune of the Saxon, or they just spit on them! negative
  17. andrew42
    andrew42 29 March 2016 20: 54
    +2
    Well the solution. Well UN. So what? Firstly, the Brits don't give a damn about such "decisions" from the high bell tower. Secondly, as already correctly noted, the people of the Falklands want to go to Argentina as a ballerina on a collective farm. Thirdly, this is certainly not our war. Although it is possible to trade in equipment for a prepayment. The only thing that, in my opinion, can be useful for us such "expansion along the shelf" is the topic of our Arctic. As a precedent strengthening our rights. Here you can express your satisfaction.
    1. Roman 11
      Roman 11 29 March 2016 22: 36
      0
      Quote: andrew42
      Thirdly, this is certainly not our war.

      I dispute that someone who is not with them may be with us - this is always beneficial, and not necessarily in the military sphere.
  18. Corvetkapitan
    Corvetkapitan 29 March 2016 21: 06
    +1
    I wonder where the legs grow from ?! The fact that the UN could not make a decision without the go-ahead of the United States is understandable to the horse, but what did the Anglo-Saxons not divide so ?! Maybe this is the US reaction to Britain’s desire to leave the euro zone ?!
  19. Pinkie F.
    Pinkie F. 29 March 2016 21: 07
    +4
    Quote: engineer74
    I feel, neighing !!!

    over whom? Seems to me - over Argentos, no? Brittam generally does not care about these attacks of "Falklandnash!" Everything is as simple as a Columbian egg - the president has changed, some new bauble is needed, the plebs must be occupied. Argentina is in the ass, the Kirchner clan has retired - a fresh idea is needed - oh! "And do not we swing, you know ..." (c)
    So - "eat oats and grind" (c)
    1. Roman 11
      Roman 11 29 March 2016 22: 38
      0
      Quote: Pinky F.
      So - "eat oats and grind" (c)

      It's too early, time will tell ......
  20. Pinkie F.
    Pinkie F. 29 March 2016 21: 22
    0
    Quote: sdc_alex
    As the history of recent years shows: all the UN is already recommendatory in nature!

    last? And Korea and Algeria of the 50s? I don’t take an African routine.
  21. simbirzit
    simbirzit 29 March 2016 21: 29
    +4
    In 1982, the Soviet construction battalion was sent to the Falkland Islands at the port of Stanley to lengthen the concrete runway. It was at this time that British troops invaded the islands, disputing control over these territories with Argentina. According to the participant in those events, Soviet soldiers mined all approaches to the airfield, armed themselves with captured weapons and withstood the siege of the British military for three days. Only thanks to the intervention of Moscow, the local military conflict was stopped - Soviet soldiers were ordered to lay down their arms http://hodar.ru/post/27453/
    1. Pinkie F.
      Pinkie F. 29 March 2016 21: 32
      -1
      Quote: simbirzit
      In 1982, the Soviet construction battalion was sent to the Falkland Islands at the port of Stanley.

      laughing super. TruthAarmu this nonsense will like it.
  22. skeptic
    skeptic 29 March 2016 22: 16
    -1
    Where are the Saxons brazenly?
    And where is Argentina?
    What did the pirates on the far shores forget?
    Punish them, Davy Jones!
    You can’t do it yourself, whisper, we wail!
  23. tehnokrat
    tehnokrat 29 March 2016 22: 25
    +1
    Quote: zao74
    They will send the UN to a known address and all matters.

    And I have the same opinion!
    However, Argentina will be able to demand to cease any UK activity on its shelf around the islands, from fishing to oil production, and to use it itself, regardless of the inconvenience of the naglosaks.
    This, of course, is not a blockade, but London's spending on the maintenance of the Falklands will grow even more:
    http://topwar.ru/71613-london-otpravit-na-folklendy-dopolnitelnye-sily-opasayas-
    ataki-argentiny.html
    1. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 29 March 2016 22: 50
      +3
      Quote: tehnokrat
      However, Argentina will be able to demand that all UK activities be stopped on its shelf around the islands.

      It would certainly be fun, but Argentina has no strength for such actions. I agree with Pinky F This is a bucha for domestic consumption. Well, like, like the Japanese have "northern territories" ... like the Russians will go west beyond the Urals, then we wow ... So that the Argentines do not shine. To defend their right to land you need to fight for centuries, maintain an army, build ships and missiles ... and not dance samba, wallow on the beach, and chase a ball.
  24. sharp-lad
    sharp-lad 29 March 2016 22: 31
    +3
    Crimea, after the referendum, Russian? Well, tads and Falklands, after a local referendum, British! Gentlemen, let's be consistent! hi
    1. RusDV
      RusDV 30 March 2016 05: 10
      +1
      Quote: sharp-lad
      Crimea, after the referendum, Russian? Well, tads and Falklands, after a local referendum, British! Gentlemen, let's be consistent! hi

      hi It is so, of course, only consistency must be observed in the recognition of such referendums by a "civilized society". Those. They do not recognize the Crimean referendum, but the Falklands - ..... but that's another matter! ..... And what about the consistency?
    2. yehat
      yehat 31 March 2016 17: 56
      0
      the British held a referendum after ethnic cleansing!
      brought the staff of oil companies, service staff and then voted.
      let's bring to Kiev because of the Urals, 10 million people and arrange a referendum there on accession to the Russian Federation. That will be exactly the same referendum.
  25. atamankko
    atamankko 29 March 2016 22: 45
    0
    Let's see what the SIRs will do next.
  26. Makarov
    Makarov 29 March 2016 23: 16
    0
    the commission is not official. Bring information in full, please ...
  27. mvnmln
    mvnmln 30 March 2016 00: 10
    +1
    For ten years the problem "matured" and here is the UN decision. What is it for?
  28. romandostalo
    romandostalo 30 March 2016 00: 19
    +1
    No, I'm just stunned !!! But what about the war? After all, how many people died?
  29. iouris
    iouris 30 March 2016 00: 45
    +1
    After Cuba, Obama arrived in Argentina and, on behalf of the United States, asked for forgiveness from the people of Argentina.
    Perhaps the Argentine military delegation will arrive in Moscow soon.
  30. certero
    certero 30 March 2016 02: 02
    +2
    Quote: tehnokrat
    However, Argentina will be able to demand to cease any UK activity on its shelf around the islands, from fishing to oil production, and to use it itself, regardless of the inconvenience of the naglosaks.

    British sovereignty over the Falklands also gives them the right to an economic zone. So Argentina cannot ban the Britons from doing anything there. Neither de jure, nor even de facto, as they have already explained above - they are weak militarily.
  31. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 30 March 2016 02: 10
    +1
    Now, our Foreign Ministry needs to announce that it will not like small Britain that the Falkland Islands belong to Argentina, which was annexed by small Britain. Here they will go around our Crimea.
  32. Evpatiy.
    Evpatiy. 30 March 2016 02: 13
    0
    Have you ever been to the Malvinas? "Well, roughly speaking, I have not been!"
  33. Wolka
    Wolka 30 March 2016 05: 15
    +2
    and the Britons do not seem to care about UN decisions, the next collective war game will be called try take away
  34. Panabebis
    Panabebis 30 March 2016 06: 39
    +1
    On a campaign on this topic, Obama did not come to Argentina for a long time. They decided to make a deal on the campaign. The islands in exchange for America's influence on Argentina ...
  35. Senior manager
    Senior manager 30 March 2016 07: 08
    +1
    According to Russian logic (Crimea), and international law, the Falkland people decided to live in small Britain, and let them live on their health. Argentina has more water - it’s also good, it remains to settle the issue with the transport links of the islands; There is nothing to solve this question by war.
  36. Putnik_16
    Putnik_16 30 March 2016 08: 55
    0
    Drive them am in the neck !!!
  37. Every
    Every 30 March 2016 09: 24
    +2
    Quote: andrew42
    Well solution. Well un. So what?


    In principle, nothing. For Russians, this is not cold, not hot. There was just a reason to point the Britons to their own punctures, otherwise they make up reference and infallible ones. Sin is such an excuse not to use when communicating with them.
  38. Rossinant
    Rossinant 30 March 2016 10: 30
    +2
    But how is it similar to us - to declare sanctions to the old woman of England until the Falklands are returned to their former owners?
  39. Normal ok
    Normal ok 30 March 2016 11: 04
    +2
    United Nations Actually Recognizes Malvinas (Falkland Islands) as Argentina

    Well, why lie then, because there is a pancake Google: "The Commission for Determining the Limits of the Continental Shelf at the UN recognized the waters surrounding the disputed Falkland Islands as Argentine. This commission is not an official UN commission, but a group of experts created on the basis of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and her decisions are advisory".
  40. Sasha_Sar
    Sasha_Sar 30 March 2016 11: 30
    +3
    The 1982 conflict erupted out of the blue. I could be mistaken, but oil deposits were discovered in this zone. Now, Argentina can fully (individually) develop them without violating international laws. It's like we have with the Lomonosov Ridge in the Arctic Ocean ...
  41. dvg1959
    dvg1959 30 March 2016 13: 23
    +1
    Let’s see how Great Britain will behave now and what the UN will say.
  42. dvg1959
    dvg1959 30 March 2016 13: 40
    +2
    They must be imposed sanctions for the annexation of the Malvinas (Falkland Islands).
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 1 2016 00: 27
      0
      Excuse me, who are the judges? winked
  43. Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn 31 March 2016 07: 15
    +2
    It would be nice to remember about Crimea in this regard ... And about the sanctions, and about the hype in the press. False Anglo-Saxons will now begin to puff out their cheeks. It is very interesting to hear what they will mutter there.
  44. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 31 March 2016 13: 58
    +2
    The UN decision deserves respect, only England is the decision before the lantern.
    When he drowns his fleet, only then will it begin to come that something is not right.
    True, this is almost from the realm of fiction.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz April 1 2016 00: 26
      0
      The Royal Navy is far from the most powerful on the planet. They have only one trump card - nuclear weapons. Everything else is so-so. Oh, if, ours, the fleet re-equipment program would be carried out accurately and on time ....
  45. Old warrior
    Old warrior 31 March 2016 16: 55
    +1
    They will not give. There are no fools like ours in 1991.
  46. behemot
    behemot 31 March 2016 19: 52
    0
    Water reptiles need to, in all directions.
  47. Gippo
    Gippo 31 March 2016 21: 47
    +1
    Here is my attitude
  48. Prisoner
    Prisoner April 1 2016 00: 30
    0
    Get Occupants Get! Bring back the islands of Argentina, vrazhin.
  49. Lily
    Lily April 1 2016 01: 33
    0
    "The local Falklands authorities (and de facto the Falklands have been annexed by Britain from Argentina) sent a letter to London asking them to clarify how they should be in connection with the decision of the UN Commission."
    Gather moneywigs and dump on the homeland.
  50. bsk_mna54
    bsk_mna54 April 1 2016 09: 13
    0
    For the invaders, this is "god's dew". The Anglo-Saxons do not have such barriers, they have long lost the spirit of honor, conscience and responsibility, the habit of killing others has already been introduced into the blood and flesh of such senile people