Military Review

Nikita Mikhalkov’s “Besogon” inflicts information attacks on the main “charm” of ultra-liberals - the era of Gorbachev and Yeltsin

286
This material is not about the Yeltsin Center specifically. He is not talking about whether it is worth or not at the official level to recognize the activities of Gorbachev and Yeltsin at the helm of a huge country as criminal today. There is even material about how people suddenly turned out to be in power, for whom a timely call to “friend George” or “Friend Bill” was many times more important than the interests of the people who turned slander, betrayed and thrown into the throat of a meat grinder, called the “transition to democracy”.


This material is about what a significant transformation occurred during this time with Russian society, that such topics are openly wanted and can be discussed by an increasing number of citizens, and even those who were considered completely loyal to the first persons of the era of “democratic changes” for some time.

Just a few days ago, I’m not afraid of this word, stunning in its emotional glow of Nikita Mikhalkov’s BesogonTV program. One of these programs is "On the imaginary and true conjuncture"another "Is there a way out of the historical labyrinth of the Yeltsin Center". In their programs, which can be seen on YouTube’s “BesogonTV” channel, Nikita Mikhalkov publishes information and its analysis, which is a real earthquake for all members of the ultra-liberal world, who have taken hold of what’s called 90’s since the beginning of democracy’s conquests ". The team of Mikhalkov cites such facts that strike a blow to the most painful place of the ultra-liberal stratum of Russia, who considered that she and she alone can give free interpretations not only to what is happening today, but also to what is connected with the thousand-year Russian history.

The “Bezogon” demonstrates the indignation of representatives of ultra-liberal “fauna” who have fallen into a stupor because of the programs of a person whom they have all been thinking about on the board for all these years, the truth suddenly appears both about themselves and those participation of whom this, excuse me, mold on the body of Russia appeared and fairly expanded. The ultra-liberals experienced a real shock when they heard the following statement from Mikhalkov:

I am sure that nothing can be built without clearing the site. And clearing the ground is at the state level recognizing the crimes of Gorbachev and Yeltsin. They committed a real crime. Voluntarily, involuntarily, guided by ambitions, not ambitions, this is not the point now. Their accomplishments led to the collapse of our country! And this is the greatest geopolitical catastrophe that happened during this century.


Nikita Mikhalkov’s “Besogon” inflicts information attacks on the main “charm” of ultra-liberals - the era of Gorbachev and Yeltsin


And it’s not even a matter of how justified or unjustified is the loud statement by the People’s Artist of the RSFSR, how much is the reaction to this statement from those who believed (and trying to assure others of this) that the collapse of a huge country, that pain and suffering its peoples as a result of this collapse is the main democratic victory of the country in the twentieth century.

And if Mikhalkov had said only what was presented in the form of a quotation above - the ultra-liberals could have considered that Nikita Sergeevich simply overturned and confused the terms. But Mikhalkov a) confirmed his point of view in one of his programs on “Bezogon” and b) presented another program, in principle, on the same topical topic - on how from the collapse epoch of a huge country and the grief of its citizens tried to blind something much more monumental than the Lenin mausoleum (talking about the Yeltsin center in Yekaterinburg).

If any of our readers did not have time to get acquainted with the material of Nikita Mikhalkov on "BesogonTV", it is worth presenting this material here - as the main subject of discussion of this article in “Military Review” (I hope Nikita Sergeevich will not make claims for allowing himself to discuss his materials).

Material on the "Yeltsin Center" and the Yeltsin era itself. The material is worth our readers to give him a few tens of minutes of their precious time. There is something to think about, there is something to give an assessment.



We looked at the materials of Nikita Mikhalkov, not only those who consider the collapse of the Russian Empire, the collapse of the USSR - the geopolitical catastrophes of the last century. We looked and ...

Nikita! - cried adherents belolentochnyh ideals. Is it you, Nikita ?! - barely moving away from the shock and with volleys squeezed this shock with expensive cognac, they continued. They shouted and dozapivyvalis to the point that, for example, Mr. Svanidze, apparently, really, stayed until now in firm confidence about the liberal handshake of Mikhalkov, declared the director "conjuncturer", and his statements and materials "Zhirinovshchina." They say it was “almost ours”, voted for EBN, spoke about its strengths. And here - the Kremlin took you, Nikita, into a turn ... Or you yourself, Nikita, decided to curry favor with the Kremlin. And the term “Zhirinovshchina” Nikolai Karlovich apparently decided to weave in red (not in the sense, of course, communist ...) literally because exactly some time ago the permanent leader of the Liberal Democratic Party declared the need to recognize the Gorbachev and Yeltsin regimes as criminal.

Well, the ultraliberal party-goers simply cannot understand that in those years, while they felt themselves masters in a huge country, both the structure of society and the ability of society to adequately (and not through the glasses given by Big Joe) perceive reality has changed. Mikhalkov himself says that he did not become an opportunist, and it was not millions of people who became opportunists, but everything was much simpler and more important - the situation itself changed. The country simply does not want to be the one that supporters of the plantation of Western idolatry constantly wiped on their feet. The people have already cheated on the transatlantic chewing gum and sipped their coca-cola "freedom" to allow themselves to remain the same mass slandered at the end of 80-beginning of 90-s, confident that 90-e are the donors of freedom ...

And now, when the belolentochnaya team tried to marvel at the same Yeltsin center, which in terms of the personality cult even surpasses everything that took place in the Soviet years (except for comparable in scope to the pyramids of the Egyptian pharaohs), it receives a blow to the temech. A group of people squealing about the personality cult of Stalin applauds the world, which is the personification of the true personality cult. He applauds, but, receiving a portion of truth and criticism, he suddenly tries to make offended people. Representatives of the supreme power do not seem to applaud, but they are laying flowers.

You offended ultra-liberals ... They are offended because they slanted a rotten cartoon about the “type” of our history, where Russia is a black, stinking stain that saved us from the shackles, You see, only Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin. Offended by the fact that they showed how Chubais gives an interview aboard an airplane and explains the essence of barbaric privatization by the need to “kill communism” - to kill, by selling all state property, even for pennies, even for the latest rogues who called themselves biznesmen ... Offended by the fact that Mikhalkov , whose work can be treated as you please (the personal matter of each), demonstrates Gorbachev’s amorphousness and Yeltsin’s servility, who reported about the collapse of the USSR, first of all to the American president, who pretended that he was not aware of all yty ... Offended ... they bucked ...

In general, the material of Nikita Mikhalkov is not just material. This is a marker that perfectly identifies all those who continue to believe that the country and the people remained the same as 25 years ago - ready to listen to nonsense about building democracy (by putting people off), ready to pick out only the worst and most rotten from the country’s history. desire - and give out for the rotten that which never was. It is to these people (Mikhalkov says about them) that it is important for all of us to be concerned about how to properly charge water and cream from the next Kashpirovsky through the TV screen, rather than why and how our army and navy were killed; by how to ride the square and shit on everything and everyone around instead of working and respecting the interests of others, not forgetting, first of all, about their own dignity.

In conclusion, I will allow myself to say this: Nikita Sergeevich, honestly, I can’t identify myself as ardent admirers of your work (as a director of most films) of recent times (it just so happened, I can’t do anything with myself), but for BesogonTV "And for the topics that are raised by your team in this program, thanks! It is for the truth - thanks!
Author:
Photos used:
http://www.besogon.tv
286 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. RUSOIVAN
    RUSOIVAN 30 March 2016 06: 12
    +39
    Mikhalkov recently even began to watch!)
    1. sdc_alex
      sdc_alex 30 March 2016 06: 21
      +48
      Besogon began to watch it too, and you know that the worst is that I will run into how he selects topics for discussion and how he submits material.
      1. KOH
        KOH 30 March 2016 06: 40
        +80
        You watched a lot, if only you started to look ..., Besogon is the best, from Mikhalkov ... (my opinion), the whole essence of our liberoshors, show tourods, and other scum, puts on public display, applause for him ...
        1. Stas57
          Stas57 30 March 2016 08: 43
          -8
          Quote: CON
          Besogon is the best, from Mikhalkov ... (my opinion), the whole essence of our liberoshors, show tourods, and other scum, puts on public display, applause for him for this.

          the whole essence of Besogon is Barin himself.
          Himself licking to power, making a shitty movie about the war with sailing for wild loot, fighting with women (albeit gulpy) from the movie, and lyingly reading moral about how to live.
          Barin have fun in morality.

          and these people forbid me to pick my nose!? (c)
          let him start with himself.
          1. arnulla
            arnulla 30 March 2016 10: 14
            +18
            Specifically, do you have any questions about Besogon? Or is "master Mikhalkov" more relevant to you than the topic of the program?
            1. Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 30 March 2016 10: 28
              +3
              Quote: arnulla
              Specifically, do you have any questions about Besogon? Or is "master Mikhalkov" more relevant to you than the topic of the program?

              Specifically, according to Besogon, what did Migalkin himself not remember his beloved in 90? How much, for example, he asked for on the Siberian barber. And more specifically, the ending did not like.
              1. arnulla
                arnulla 30 March 2016 12: 13
                +16
                And we, beloved ones, in the 90s do not want to remember? Many citizens fit into the defense of the USSR, the party, then bureaucrats? .. That's the same. Therefore, we are all not sinless. And we are all responsible for what happened
                1. Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 30 March 2016 13: 02
                  +5
                  Here, Damir, few people understood what was happening there in Moscow. Only here from this film, in addition to the moronic cartoon, I did not learn anything new. But the position of Nikita is squeamish, which, while coaxing the 90, itself at that time, very well raised at the expense of the state. Kremlin stars were extinguished at his request.
                  1. avia1991
                    avia1991 30 March 2016 15: 31
                    0
                    Quote: Mordvin 3
                    raised very well at the expense of the state.

                    Were you a bookkeeper, my dear? Or again "OBS"? "Where are the firewoods from", share? Desirable with evidence-based links. Or, in your opinion, did he come from the USSR to Russia as a beggar?
                    1. Mordvin 3
                      Mordvin 3 30 March 2016 18: 48
                      +5
                      I’m not a bookkeeper, and not a tax one, but the fact that all of his films, starting with the barber, were financially disastrous - everyone knows about this.
                      1. barbiturate
                        barbiturate 31 March 2016 14: 02
                        +1
                        Everybody knows - strong evidence
                      2. Urfin
                        Urfin 31 March 2016 14: 50
                        +1
                        Cash gathering
                        http://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/16445/box/

                        you will find the rest
                    2. avia1991
                      avia1991 31 March 2016 17: 56
                      +1
                      Quote: Mordvin 3
                      all his films, starting with the barber, were financially disastrous - everyone knows about it.

                      Highlighted key phrase. This means that you have no concrete evidence of its "rise" at the expense of the state. And if so - there is no need to throw accusations! Or do you think that the questions he raises in "Besogon" are nonsense, not worthy of attention ?!
                      By the way, contradict yourself: if all the films were a failure, how did he rise "at the expense of the state"? Did the state pay him "compensation" for non-cash films?
                    3. shasherin.pavel
                      shasherin.pavel 31 March 2016 18: 58
                      0
                      And "The Young Lady" is also a disastrous work for those times, everyone said that this could not be. And "The Inspector General" ... it is now considered a classic, and at that time, the author could have hit him on the head ... or rather received it with a delay. Failure today does not mean anything yet ... the descendants will think it will be so.
                    4. Mordvin 3
                      Mordvin 3 31 March 2016 19: 48
                      +3
                      Air
                      Barber Data
                      Budget 35mln dollars.
                      Cash gathering 2mln. 600thousand dollars.
                      In the West, as far as I know, money for a film is taken on credit from a bank. Or at the sponsor. By the way, I remember very well how, at the time of the barber’s release, the media wrote about a budget of 47 million. The Mikhalkovs in the USSR were underground millionaires? And he has problems with finances, yes. That year, a billion asked for folk bakeries. And to listen to the opinion of a person who was a communist the day before yesterday, was a democrat yesterday, and today he became a monarchist, I personally, just disgusted.
            2. andrew42
              andrew42 31 March 2016 18: 25
              +2
              No, no. Will not work! What kind of Chernomyrdin "we have made a ..li country" ?! There is nothing to hang dogs on the people. It is necessary to hang, of course, but not dogs, but it is clear who and for what. For the collapse of the Union in 1991. For the shooting of Parliament in 1993. Many persons involved in those crimes are still happily smoking this light.
            3. shasherin.pavel
              shasherin.pavel 31 March 2016 18: 53
              0
              And the statement in 1982 on the early voluntary withdrawal from the Komsomol is considered a protest? True, to say, when I learned that people from the KGB are interested in me, I even know that the director of the ORS base in Monchegorsk Petukhov riveted me after the Komsomol meeting, three months later he quietly merged into the Pobeda collective farm in the Pushkinogorsk region ...
        2. Gray brother
          Gray brother 30 March 2016 10: 45
          +11
          Quote: arnulla
          Specifically, do you have any questions about Besogon? Or is "master Mikhalkov" more relevant to you than the topic of the program?

          There are no complaints about the content of the transfer, but there are claims against the presenter. Therefore, cognitive dissonance arises.
          It would be interesting to listen to his opinion about Stalin, it seems to me that Mikhalkov is unlikely to go against his own work in this matter.
          1. antoXa
            antoXa 30 March 2016 11: 40
            +2
            Gray brother
            they are not interested in topics) they have a different task! Even if he will be right a thousand times and will say the right things, they will still pour mud on him, such people!
            1. Gray brother
              Gray brother 30 March 2016 12: 04
              +6
              Quote: antoXa
              Even if he will be right a thousand times and will say the right things, they will still pour mud on him, such people!

              I also can’t calmly pass him by, I’ll definitely throw a shit at him.

              And think if Venediktov from "Echo of Moscow" decides to change his image and also on one of the TV channels will say the right things (I believe that he is capable of this - his mouth opens).
              There will be exactly the same effect, only more pronounced. Because yes, they are such people. Do not spit, as they say, into the well.
              1. antoXa
                antoXa 30 March 2016 13: 44
                +16
                Gray brother
                In everyday life, I quite often observe how people change their minds about the same things in a fairly short period of time.
                A number of my acquaintances, for example, were extremely happy with their lives and shouted, "Putin is our President", then "Medvedev for the President"))))))), exactly as long as their life was good, until they had the opportunity to do business, buy in China and Europe and sell in Russia at 3-10 times more expensive, such a good business is "useful", drive Lexus and Infinity, and then once and over the past couple of years all this has gone to dust, you know why ... And now I can't meet with them, because now, in their opinion, we now have the most suck power in our country!
                So why do you deny the right to change opinion and position Mikhalkov? Today, in my opinion, he makes a positive contribution, including to the formation of public opinion on many issues, so why throw kakahi into this positive undertaking? I can’t understand this.
                1. Gray brother
                  Gray brother 30 March 2016 14: 40
                  +2
                  Quote: antoXa
                  So why do you deny the right to change opinion and position Mikhalkov?

                  I don’t deny the benefit of his undertaking, but I don’t believe that he has "reformed" either.
                  Pereobulsya once, reprogrammed and the second.
                  After all, there are reverse precedents, like Strelkov-Girkin’s example - at first he drowned for Russia and went in heroes, but now he is creating a committee against the cursed Putin.
                  1. avia1991
                    avia1991 30 March 2016 15: 36
                    +2
                    Quote: Gray Brother
                    now creates a committee against the sworn Putin.

                    ??? You didn’t mix anything up? As far as I know, the goals and objectives of that committee are completely different.
                  2. Gray brother
                    Gray brother 30 March 2016 16: 18
                    +5
                    Quote: avia1991
                    ??? You didn’t mix anything up? As far as I know, the goals and objectives of that committee are completely different.

                    Goals can be proclaimed as you like. They have:
                    “First you need to save the country within the borders of the Russian Federation, to prevent its disintegration, as in 1991, and then to pursue a policy of reuniting the Russian people in one state. At the same time, Russians for us are, as before 1917, the trinity of Great Russians, Little Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians ”
                    Ask any Ukrainian legal guard - he will tell you that he is a patriot of his country and his soul hurts for Ukraine - for United Ukraine, please note.
                    Maxim Kalashnikov (member of the committee):
                    “The current government is sick and preoccupied with self-destruction. We do not intend to impose on her as assistants. And smear in it - too. She is now turning into a walking dead before our eyes ... ".

                    Eduard Limonov (member of the committee):
                    “Why is this (the creation of the“ Committee ”) a major event? Because now you have where to run, to whom to join and under whose banners to become in the event of a cataclysm. In addition to power and pro-Western liberals, a third force has emerged. ”

                    The presence in the committee of the Nazis Prosvirin and Krylov is generally without comment.
                    "Patriots" of this kind are the future muscles of the Maidan.

                    Details and with historical parallels here:
                    https://cont.ws/post/188927
              2. pl675
                pl675 30 March 2016 16: 49
                +3
                So why do you refuse the right to change opinion and position Mikhalkov? Today, in my opinion, he makes a positive contribution, including to the formation of public opinion on many issues, so why throw kakahi into his positive undertaking?

                this pseudo-moralist should change his shoes, how do you blow your nose - tomorrow is the president of Kadyrov / hypothetically / - the day after tomorrow Mikhalkov is converted to Islam, and he will still be given money to shoot thematic feces like "Ichkerian sun-scorched - 14"
        3. avia1991
          avia1991 30 March 2016 15: 33
          +5
          Quote: Gray Brother
          It seems to me that Mikhalkov is unlikely to go against his own creativity in this matter.

          Look at the annotation of the Besogon issues: I don’t presume to say 100%, but it seems like there is something about it. Look - then conclusions can be drawn. And thinking out for another is a thankless task hi
          1. antoXa
            antoXa 30 March 2016 15: 56
            +3
            avia1991
            I agree! Someone’s own soul is sometimes dark, but to get into the soul of other people and try to understand them, let alone judge them, look for pitfalls there - this is not a very good thing.
        4. Severianyanin
          Severianyanin 31 March 2016 17: 30
          +2
          Yes, he already spoke about Stalin .. It’s like they wouldn’t say it, but it was with him that the country rose very much and won the war, with all the mistakes made then ... Not literally, but the meaning is that.
    2. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 30 March 2016 15: 05
      +3
      but says something on the case
      1. natakor1949
        natakor1949 31 March 2016 17: 20
        -2
        Lyashko on the outskirts also seems to say the case, and WHAT?
    3. Alena Frolovna
      Alena Frolovna 30 March 2016 15: 07
      +5
      * Now a lot depends on us, on our attitude to life, on memory for the sake of those who recently laid down their lives for the sake of our Fatherland, and therefore for all of us: both bad and good, and white, and red, and loving their country, and "khataskrayniks".

      One choice for everyone: Will we cover Russia - by ourselves?..
    4. avia1991
      avia1991 30 March 2016 15: 25
      +6
      Quote: Stas57
      warring with women (albeit gulpy) from the movie, and deceitfully reading moral how to live
      What are you saying ?! belay That's about morality - somehow I didn’t notice ..
      Perhaps you have WHAT to say to modern liberals .. maybe there are even FACTS that irrefutably prove the rotten essence of specific ones .. AND WHERE ARE THEY SAME? Why are you silent?! AND?!
      Yes because NOBODY WILL ALLOW YOU to get out on the big screen, and just like that - specifically with facts - to convey information to most viewers! YOU WILL NOT BE ALLOWED! .. And Mikhalkov CAN DO it - and thank him for what he does. There are not many among famous personalities of people who are able to openly ask such questions.
      By the way .. you don't have to shout about your "free opinion on VO" - in comparison with the general mass of the population, we can say that NO ONE HEARS YOU. Besides the regulars of the site, what a drop in the bucket .. hi
      1. Victor Demchenko
        Victor Demchenko 30 March 2016 16: 49
        +3
        you know Seryozha, but you're right ... belay and the most annoying:
        Quote: avia1991
        By the way .. you don't have to shout about your "free opinion on VO" - in comparison with the general mass of the population, we can say that NO ONE HEARS YOU

        hi
    5. oracul
      oracul 31 March 2016 08: 01
      +1
      It is necessary to be able to distinguish the main from the secondary. It is not necessary to be in love with Mikhalkov’s work as a filmmaker, you can always remember such a feature of the Mikhalkov clan — as being loyal to any government, it is much more important how relevant his assessments of events are and whether it helps to strengthen the state. This is the main thing today, and everything else is secondary.
      1. natakor1949
        natakor1949 31 March 2016 17: 27
        +2
        Tomorrow Ivanov-Petrov-Sidorov will come to power, and I’m sure Mikhalkov will scold the time of Vladimir Putin’s reign. Naughty, father, does not die, especially in their clan clan.
        1. avia1991
          avia1991 31 March 2016 18: 01
          +1
          Quote: natakor1949
          Mikhalkov, I am sure, will scold the time of the reign of Vladimir Putin

          NEVER try to think for others - you will always be wrong.
          When “tomorrow” comes, and another person comes to power, then you will draw conclusions. And now you just wishful thinking, based on YOUR LOGIC - which is not the fact that the most true. hi
      2. Stanislas
        Stanislas 31 March 2016 19: 54
        0
        Quote: oracul
        remember such a feature of the Mikhalkov clan - how to be loyal to any government
        Let me disagree with you. The genus, about which you, like many here, are speaking so much, is rather a love for Russia, which can be expressed creatively under any authority, whether local art critics like it or not, is the second question. On the other hand, without equally high-profile repentance for the support of that power, harsh and fair criticism of Yeltsin, time, all of us who fit into this era and who fell out of it, somehow does not stick to the National Assembly. For a sincere conversation with the viewer does not pull. That looks like a visiting lecturer, and in some places a gentleman who, in his dirty estate of his protégé — the village headman — and dismantles his handy.
  2. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 30 March 2016 08: 57
    +4
    Quote: CON
    Besogon is the best from Mikhalkov.

    How about Burnt by the Sun 2? wink
  • smel
    smel 30 March 2016 08: 42
    +25
    I waited ... I waited for when this topic will finally appear on the site. Thanks to the author for appearing, which gives once again the opportunity to think, to remember ...
    Special thanks to Mikhalkov. Like the author, I am not a fan of the works of either Mikhalkov or his family. I am skeptical because of the frank subservience of the Mikhalkovo-Konchalovsky clan to the authorities. But Besogo is luck, luck for our society with the opportunity to learn about the surrounding problems and evaluate them. The theme of the last Besogon is a masterpiece in general. A lot has been said truthfully, frankly and strictly. Thanks to Mikhalkov for his citizenship, thanks and for the courage to talk about this problem. But the ending of the program is still Lisoblyudsky. Although I understand that if there had not been such a finale, this program would not have come out.
    1. Oorfene Deuce
      Oorfene Deuce 30 March 2016 09: 36
      +11
      Barin certainly surprised ... Not the right word. But what lies behind this?
      I admit that what is told in "Besogon" is done sincerely and frankly, although the ending is certainly blurred. A kind of small spoonful of honey in defense of the current government.
      But on the other hand, why was this not done in the harsh and dashing 90s? The country was drunk and sold before everyone's eyes, where were all these figures? Why now, in hindsight, are they earning bonuses? Surely just now eyes have opened? It’s hard to believe it.
      I don’t know, personally, my opinion is twofold ... I want to trust, but it’s difficult.
      1. Executer
        Executer 30 March 2016 10: 03
        +6
        "But on the other hand, why was this not done in the harsh and dashing 90s? The country was drunk and sold before everyone's eyes, where were all these figures?"
        I will try to answer. These figures grabbed for themselves zemaritsa for nothing, built mansions there and paved large roads to them, bypassing the existing villages aside (leaving devastation for subsequent shootings).
        Let the National Assembly better show its estate at least in the Vologda Oblast.
        And even shorter said W. Gaft:
        "Russia! Do you smell this strange itch ?!
        Three Mikhalkov are crawling over you! "

        Only now is Nikita himself itching: how so? They drank together, had fun. Yeltsin Center built, and Mikhalkov Center where?
      2. sherp2015
        sherp2015 30 March 2016 12: 45
        +9
        Quote: Oorfene Deuce
        Barin certainly surprised ... Not the right word. But what lies behind this?
        I admit that what is told in "Besogon" is done sincerely and frankly, although the ending is certainly blurred. A kind of small spoonful of honey in defense of the current government.
        But on the other hand, why was this not done in the harsh and dashing 90s? The country was drunk and sold before everyone's eyes, where were all these figures? Why now, in hindsight, are they earning bonuses? Surely just now eyes have opened? It’s hard to believe it.
        I don’t know, personally, my opinion is twofold ... I want to trust, but it’s difficult.


        I think now I’ll be stuck with the minuses of the ... policy, but I will speak out anyway.
        These figures of art and culture, and their colleagues from Mass Media at that time begged for billions to create worthless films, and all sorts of stupid TV programs like "Smakov" with the Makorevichs, Yulia Vysotsky. Supported by the Eltsyn government, which fired at the legally elected parliament in 93 with tank guns, and threw mud at the army after being dragged into the war in Chechnya.
        And now they sensed the direction of the wind, and all of them hit patriotism as one.
        Our television is clearly not ours, but alien, in any case, much larger part
        1. avia1991
          avia1991 30 March 2016 15: 38
          0
          Quote: sherp2015
          And now they sensed the direction of the wind, and all of them hit patriotism as one.

          AND WHO are "THEY"? List on your fingers? I think one hand will be a lot.
          1. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 30 March 2016 15: 53
            0
            Quote: avia1991
            AND WHO are "THEY"?

            Hi Seryoga! hi Yes, there are a lot of them in fact, Dorenko, Solovyov, Kedmi. This is from odious figures.
            1. avia1991
              avia1991 30 March 2016 16: 09
              +3
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              there are many of them actually

              Hi, Igor! hi
              Jews do not count! And Dorenko - who hears it? And who is listening? For example, I point blank do not see his speeches denouncing the Yeltsin era request To promote on this topic - yes, many are happy! But "Besogon" was born quite a long time ago, and I watch it not for Mikhalkov's sake - from whom I have never been delighted - but for the sake of information and how it is presented. And I must admit: interesting, competent and useful for the cause.
              And Mikhalkov can be perceived as ... a "demon-possessed priest": when such a priest leads the service in the Temple, the Lord himself controls his lips! Using the possessed body like a microphone lol
          2. Victor Demchenko
            Victor Demchenko 30 March 2016 16: 53
            +1
            Well, let's start by growth:
            1. Mikhalkov N.S.
            2. well this one ... the singer is about a general ... well, he remembered the song about the squadron of his crazy thoughts.
            and more examples are needed?
      3. antoXa
        antoXa 30 March 2016 13: 48
        +3
        Oorfene Deuce
        And what did you do in the 90s, if not secret?
        I've wanted to become a bandit), I dreamed of stirring up a couple of tents in the market)))
        1. Oorfene Deuce
          Oorfene Deuce 30 March 2016 16: 05
          +4
          Quote: antoXa
          And what did you do in the 90s, if not secret?

          The 90th long term to stop on something concrete ...
          And so - he migrated from the sunny republic of Central Asia to his historical homeland to Russia. Studied. He served in the army, then went to work in law enforcement. There was no thought to become a bandit.
          1. antoXa
            antoXa 30 March 2016 18: 30
            +3
            Oorfene Deuce
            I think it means that we also saw enough then what the people who were "presented" with freedom are capable of and saw what actions seem to be normal people are capable of ...
            Since the collapse of the union, a lot has changed in the life and in the minds and souls of people, I can judge by myself, by the people of whom I knew and know.
            And I honestly wouldn’t dare to judge Mikhalkov, unlike many here, we don’t know anything about him and his life.
            This article is about his specific project, which I unequivocally put +
            It’s just that I am openly enraged by people who immediately start looking for everything, it’s not about you, specifically ...
            They begin to recall those weary of the sun right away ... and to blame Mikhalkov as a director.
            Honestly, but I immediately remember the film "my own among strangers, a stranger among my own" I just adore this film, it is oh, oh, no! The game of wonderful actors and a very good and correct plot in the film!
            1. avia1991
              avia1991 31 March 2016 18: 06
              0
              Quote: antoXa
              This article is about his specific project.

              What many people here "quickly" forgot about, switching to personalities.
          2. avia1991
            avia1991 31 March 2016 18: 04
            0
            Quote: Oorfene Deuce
            went to work in law enforcement. There was no bandit to become thoughts

            laughing ! "Law enforcement agencies" and "bandits" were synonymous for many in the 90s! ..
            No offence hi
  • The comment was deleted.
  • siberalt
    siberalt 30 March 2016 11: 42
    +3
    Will we discuss the author’s message or the personality of Mikhalkov and Saakashvili’s brooks? bully
  • yastr
    yastr 30 March 2016 16: 42
    0
    This program was shown in Russia 24
  • Private IITR
    Private IITR 31 March 2016 14: 29
    0
    Let it be better then to release these programs than to film
  • Finches
    Finches 30 March 2016 06: 51
    +67
    We have a country of paradoxes! Stalin, who left the country that broke the ridge of fascism, with industry and astronautics, nuclear technology, not only liberals, but also senior executives, scientists, political scientists ... consider their murderer to be a murderer, and put down monuments to those who ruined and sold everything to Gorbachev and Yeltsin ! The first one has not died yet - otherwise it would be the same somewhere. The Mausoleum would have been banned already! In the Stavropol Territory - with a monumental composition at the entrance - Misha and a combine, and next to Raisa in a peasant scarf, serving a lid of milk .... laughing

    And the Mikhalkovs - they lived well under all the rulers - you must be able to do the same! laughing
    1. Corporal Valera
      Corporal Valera 30 March 2016 08: 26
      +14
      And so the thought is spinning that Nikita Sergeevich himself put his creative hand to distort our history. As I can see now a poster where he butts with Stalin. And what about the "stick assault" of the citadel ... What is it? Awareness? Or bending to match the batch line?
      1. Gray brother
        Gray brother 30 March 2016 08: 33
        +8
        Quote: Corporal Valera
        Or bend according to the line of the party?

        No, the "party" is kissing Yeltsin in the ass now - it doesn't fit.
        Maybe conscience woke up in old age, although I doubt something.
        Rather, he decided to publish his memoirs with reflection.
        1. sherp2015
          sherp2015 30 March 2016 12: 48
          +4
          Quote: Gray Brother
          Maybe conscience woke up in old age, although I doubt something.


          ))))))))))))))))) Migalkin and conscience? What are you talking about...
      2. THE_SEAL
        THE_SEAL 30 March 2016 16: 08
        +2
        Maybe our furry bumblebee "saw the light"? And if before filming "Weary Sun", where the main character strangled Stalin in his sleep. Now that's how it is. And mind you, in 91, a lot of such figures went out to support democracy. I remember the film "Genius" with Abdulov. A lot of fighters for freedom of Russia there turned out against the Soviet Union, who now recall with breath the Soviet era. How can you trust them? Another PR. Putin gave the command - "The collapse of the Union is the greatest catastrophe." And so. They work out. Mikitka would be ashamed. Ugh.
    2. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 30 March 2016 08: 48
      +2
      Quote: Finches
      And the Mikhalkovs - they lived well under all the rulers - you must be able to do the same!

      Mr. Svanidze, apparently indeed still firmly convinced of the liberal handshake of Mikhalkov, declared the director a "conjuncturist," and his statements and materials "Zhirinovschina." Like, he was "almost ours", voted for EBN, spoke about his strengths. And here - the Kremlin took you, Nikita, into circulation ... Or you yourself, Nikita, decided to curry favor with the Kremlin. And the term "Zhirinovschina" Nikolai Karlovich, apparently, decided to weave for the red (not in the sense, of course, the communist ...) word exactly because some time ago the permanent leader of the Liberal Democratic Party declared the need to recognize the Gorbachev and Yeltsin regimes as criminal

      Although I can’t stand Svanidze, I completely agree with his expression regarding Mikhalkov.
      You have to beg for some money for filming the next absolutely unattainable "opuses", with the involvement of the entire Migalkov family.
      1. Bongo
        Bongo 30 March 2016 08: 57
        +18
        In his programs, which can be seen on the BesogonTV channel on YouTube, Nikita Mikhalkov publishes information and its analysis, which is a real earthquake for all representatives of the ultra-liberal world, with sharp teeth clutching at what has been called “democratic gains” since the beginning of the 90’s ".

        But did Mikhalkov keep silent before, or had his eyes opened just now? It is easy to expose rulers who have lost power or gone to another world negative With the same pathos, another "mikhalkov" creeping now before the current leadership will expose him when today's "God-given" rulers are deprived of power.
        1. avia1991
          avia1991 30 March 2016 15: 46
          +3
          Quote: Bongo
          But did Mikhalkov keep silent before, or had his eyes opened just now? It is easy to expose rulers who have lost power or gone to another world

          And before the "EBN-center" was not, and SUCH exaltation of the "feat of the alcoholic" too: everything that was expressed was done in an extremely restrained form. Liberators who stuck, such as Chubais, Gref, Dvorkovich, etc., were vilified, both by the "Duma members" and senators, and the EBN was "left alone": well, he died and died. And now it turns out that he is taller than Lenin and Stalin! Oh how! .. Therefore, the topic of the transfer arose because they decided not to rewrite the TU History, which we studied from books - TU, the witnesses and participants of which we ourselves were!
  • viktorrymar
    viktorrymar 30 March 2016 09: 39
    +8
    But I don’t look, because I’m sick, that he was silent under Yeltsin when he received grandmothers for his films, what’s this called? .... Market analyst!
    1. arnulla
      arnulla 30 March 2016 10: 19
      +11
      We are all smart with a backward mind ... Many of us who write here have taken to the streets to prevent the collapse of the country and chaos after? It's the same thing. Is it easy to condemn others, and ask the gut from yourself?
      1. viktorrymar
        viktorrymar 30 March 2016 11: 54
        +7
        arnulla

        We are all smart with a backward mind ... Many of us who write here have taken to the streets to prevent the collapse of the country and chaos after? It's the same thing. Is it easy to condemn others, and ask the gut from yourself?

        Well, I don’t know how old you are arnulla, then I was 16 years old and I remember that the people trusted the state leadership in everything, and it never occurred to anyone to go out into the streets
        ...
        1. arnulla
          arnulla 30 March 2016 12: 25
          +5
          Well, at that time I was a little more. But that's not the point. You are sick of Mikhalkov, who was silent at that time. But I lead to the fact that the majority was silent, you know, the majority. Does the majority also feel sick? Or somehow selectively?))) As for the "grandmother for his films", how could he get them yet? And millions of other citizens who also received salaries from the budget at that time or worked in commercial structures? Who received from the budget for the development of their business (there were some, probably)?
        2. Captain nemo
          Captain nemo 30 March 2016 14: 33
          0
          Quote: viktorrymar
          Well, I don’t know how old you are arnulla, then I was 16 years old and I remember that the people trusted the state leadership in everything, and it never occurred to anyone to go out into the streets

          You have a very bad memory, unfortunately I also lived at that time only 10 years older than you. If by the word "people" you meant the whole of Russia, then you missed the mark. Moscow and the miners of Vorkuta did not trust the leadership of the USSR / the state, and they just went out to Moscow streets / squares in order to "fight" Gorbachev and Ryzhkov, so hated by them, who did not give them the square meters of Moscow apartments and "fair" ( according to Gorbachev) demands for an increase in "meager" wages Vorkuta miners mining anthracite in "difficult conditions" because those proletarians did not know how to feed their wives and children "tomorrow" because they did not have any money or products in stores, so how they stole it all from them Gorbachev with Ryzhkov and other members of the CPSU and ate it themselves, so that the children of the Vorkuta miners would remain hungry.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • RUSS
    RUSS 30 March 2016 10: 13
    +6
    Quote: RUSOIVAN
    Mikhalkov recently even began to watch!)

    Nikitos did not say anything new .... pouring a trend now fashionable.
  • SU69
    SU69 30 March 2016 10: 22
    +2
    Quote: RUSOIVAN
    Mikhalkov recently even began to watch!)

    Is able to lick the mustachioed power.
    As a director, it ended completely.
    With a hunchback he pushed for perestroika.
    In 1996, he actively campaigned for Yeltsin.
    One word - "man" of easy virtue! [Media = http: //img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/4508/varjag-2007.c9/0_4a2cf_bd6378d7_XL]
  • Vend
    Vend 30 March 2016 10: 41
    +4
    Quote: RUSOIVAN
    Mikhalkov recently even began to watch!)

    But because he is telling the truth. The cartoon is obscene, it is such cartoons that children should not watch.
    1. avva2012
      avva2012 30 March 2016 10: 52
      +5
      it is such cartoons that children should not watch.

      A child after watching such a cartoon can become anyone within the borders: a maniac-killer victim, without other options. The image of Ivan the Terrible is at first worth it. Everything will fall into the subcortex, take it ready.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • siberalt
    siberalt 30 March 2016 11: 28
    +6
    Respect to the author, definitely!
    The Mikhalkovs have always been in the stream with the "current ruling". This is their lot and merit, including. Being "at court" is not always a bad thing. There would be an understanding and scale of vision of this or that event. What Mikhalkov sends to the viewer, perhaps, is a single concept of the essence of Russia's existence. Here, or from "hair on end", to complete denial and complete sweeping away with the removal of the brain, to a concrete understanding of reality. Strong transmission, there is almost nothing to say.
    But one thing I can say is that people like Mikhalkov have the finest instinct for the smallest "movement" in power. Be sure of this. Everything is still ahead. hi
    1. Senior manager
      Senior manager 30 March 2016 13: 11
      +3
      sibiralt. I hope that Mikhalkov's stirring suggests that Russian statesmen have the strength and confidence in victory over the pseudo-liberals, but for some reason Chubais is inviolable, the President speaks positively about the EBN's board, although he knows more than we do about his rule, the Head of Great Russia in the 90s. e drunk dancing next to amerovsky president. It was vomiting to watch. And, in a purely Soviet way, VO commentators do not discuss the author's article or "Besogon", but give their assessments of the personalities of these and the freshness of the linen. Och constructive.
  • sherp2015
    sherp2015 30 March 2016 12: 24
    +1
    Quote: RUSOIVAN
    Mikhalkov recently even began to watch!)

    Quote: sdc_alex
    the Besogon began to watch it, and you know that the worst is that I will run into how he selects topics for discussion and how he submits material.


    Everything would be fine, he says now of course correctly.
    If only a normal person, Patriot, and sybarite did not roll like cheese in oil, would lead this program instead, then I think there were a hundred times more listeners.
    MiGalkov has his nose downwind as a hereditary factor from his father
  • max702
    max702 30 March 2016 14: 40
    +6
    Yeah .. It looks like it really began to change in the country .. Well, if Mikhalkov started singing about the change of course, it means yes they decided to anathematize the liberals and everything connected with them .. Why? And it's just that the Mikhalkov family has NEVER been mistaken in the course of power! It is straightforward for them to genetically catch the slightest change in the course of those in power .. So everything will change in the near future, and for all actinically passive liberals this is a direct signal to think about it, and it is desirable to collect things .. If Zhirinovsky's statements were the first touchstone (and as you know Zhirik and they hold them to voice the delicate ideas of the leadership and study the reaction to them) then Mikhalkov's rhetoric is a 100% hint to all these "comrades" "In short, if the road is a skin to quickly collect things and get rid of Russia .. Then there will be chances, although personally I would allocate strength and funds for the return of these characters home, conducting the trial and for soap with a rope .. and who can not be returned to dig in a foreign land .. you can live .. They deserve it ..
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 30 March 2016 15: 54
      +1
      Quote: max702
      Oh, if Mikhalkov started singing about a change of course that means yes they decided to anathematize the liberals and everything connected with them

      Have you ever seen the issue number? "Ah, Mikhalkov sang in a new way!" .. No. 94. Think how long he "sings" like that? It didn’t happen "yesterday", and the authorities were not going to change anything at that time. And it - "Besogon" - was already "closed", by the way ..
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 31 March 2016 08: 24
        +2
        In conclusion, I will allow myself to say this: Nikita Sergeevich, honestly, I can’t identify myself as ardent admirers of your work (as a director of most films) of recent times (it just so happened, I can’t do anything with myself), but for BesogonTV "And for the topics that are raised by your team in this program, thanks! It is for the truth - thanks!
        For the truth about the Yeltsin, and about the late Gorbachev pages of the history of our country - thank you. Mikhalkov is much smarter than many thought before. Yes, and civil courage not to occupy, well done - this is about the Yeltsin Center to say to the whole country!
  • starshina78
    starshina78 31 March 2016 09: 37
    +2
    This morning in the "Replica" section on the "Vesti 24" channel, this Svanidze was scattered with hatred and reproaches in relation to Mikhalkov. Once again, he showed his vile nature. Mikhalkov, I'm surprised! Honestly, I don't like him as a director, as a person. He seems too pretentious, arrogant. And now he began to respect. Subscribed to Besogon TV. Look! Mikhalkov says the right thing!
    1. Basarev
      Basarev 31 March 2016 16: 25
      +2
      Peredul on the go, infection. Does he really think that for a couple of dirty words he will be forgiven and forgotten by all his works?
      1. avia1991
        avia1991 31 March 2016 18: 11
        0
        Quote: Basarev
        He really thinks that for a couple of dirty words they will forgive him

        ??? This is about the highlighted.
        Start watching with the 1st issue of "Besogon" - by the way, there are already 94 of them, so it is somehow incorrect to talk about "a couple of" dirty "words".
        And when you look at least a dozen programs - maybe other conclusions will appear?
        1. Basarev
          Basarev 31 March 2016 21: 10
          0
          But we understand that he just repainted. Personally, I have always been firm in my views: the death of the Union is a tragedy. Market reforms are a scam. To be friends with the West and surrender to it are two different things.
  • venaya
    venaya 30 March 2016 06: 17
    +9
    The Besogon demonstrates the indignation of representatives of the ultra-liberal "fauna"

    The impression of Mikhalkov has only recently been improving, I’m not talking about his films, I’m talking about his civic position - and this is not the same thing.
    I am beginning to understand what he tried to show in films, and what he did, there is a noticeable difference, due to the problematic principles of financing modern film production. The last "Besogon" just delighted me, never expected this from anyone.
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 30 March 2016 08: 07
      +10
      Quote: venaya
      , I’m not talking about his films, I’m talking about his civic position - and this is not the same thing.

      He is a professional and tries to be trendy. In fairness, I must say that even a pro-government position cannot be sewn onto him, because the Russian leadership is promoting the idea of ​​"St. Yeltsin".
      1. sherp2015
        sherp2015 30 March 2016 12: 53
        +1
        Quote: Gray Brother
        Quote: venaya
        , I’m not talking about his films, I’m talking about his civic position - and this is not the same thing.
        He is a professional and tries to be trendy. In fairness, I must say that even a pro-government position cannot be sewn onto him, because the Russian leadership is promoting the idea of ​​"St. Yeltsin".


        What? He will create and the image of a saint?
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 30 March 2016 15: 09
          +4
          Quote: sherp2015
          What? He will create and the image of a saint?

          They created the second Nicholas (Bloody), despite the fact that, as a ruler, he was approximately at the level of Yeltsin and, plus everything, he loved the whole Empire.
          Today it is customary to blame the Bolsheviks who were brought in the sealed car, but in fact, their own generals and ministers overthrew him and fed him, and he, according to the current status, is now like the Dolly innocent sheep.
          Here is an example of the successful formation of public opinion.

          Obstructing such things is possible and necessary, you just need to tell your children more often how it really was.
          Look out from Stalin how many hundred people have been sculpting already - from the time of Khrushchev and even henna smile and Yeltsin not be an angel.
  • jetfors_84
    jetfors_84 30 March 2016 06: 17
    +5
    Yeltsin’s mausoleum was built more.
    1. Nsk 54
      Nsk 54 30 March 2016 06: 30
      +9
      Why a mausoleum when there is already a "Yeltsin Center".
    2. Imperialkolorad
      Imperialkolorad 30 March 2016 06: 49
      +26
      Quote: jetfors_84
      Yeltsin’s mausoleum was built more.

      The mausoleum, unfortunately, would be much cheaper than this center. Finally, we decided to inflict maximum economic damage on us. As if EBN did little damage and misfortune to the country.
      1. andj61
        andj61 30 March 2016 07: 42
        +1
        Quote: ImperialKolorad
        The mausoleum, unfortunately, would be much cheaper than this center.

        Cheaper, and for sure ...
        So let it be a monument to the era of the drunkard and destroyer Boris, and, God forbid, one of the few and perhaps the last monument - since you foolishly spent the money on this!
        1. KOH
          KOH 30 March 2016 07: 56
          +3
          It is also necessary for schools to forbid schoolchildren to drive there so that children do not break their minds there ...
  • BecmepH
    BecmepH 30 March 2016 06: 30
    +4
    Mikhalkov recently even began to watch!)
    The same nonsense ... I have a feeling that the command "face" has been given. Outwardly, we have determined the "boundaries" for jackals, it is time to bring out evil spirits at home.
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 30 March 2016 08: 51
      +3
      Quote: BecmepH
      I have a feeling that the command "fas" has been given. Outwardly, we have determined the "boundaries" for jackals, it is time to bring out evil spirits at home.

      There are also such suspicions. Vaughn and Zhirinovsky, the master of keeping his nose upwind, recently called for the official regimes to recognize the Yeltsin and Gorbachev regimes.
      1. sherp2015
        sherp2015 30 March 2016 12: 54
        +2
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        and Zhirinovsky, the master of keeping his nose upwind, recently called for the official regimes to recognize the Yeltsin and Gorbachev regimes.


        Well, duck, it's time to admit!
  • Pitot
    Pitot 30 March 2016 06: 31
    +12
    Quote: jetfors_84
    Yeltsin’s mausoleum was built more.

    Yeah, in the outhouse and that all shit on him.
  • Severok
    Severok 30 March 2016 06: 33
    +7
    After all, people change. A little, but all the same. At the time of Boris Mikhalkov did not say that - he was silent, now he speaks. It's just not clear - is it his own opinion or did he fulfill a certain "order"?
    1. KOH
      KOH 30 March 2016 06: 44
      +3
      During the time of Yeltsin, in general, only a few spoke about this, most of them wearing pink glasses of shit democracy walked and took freedom as much as they wanted, now they seem to have had enough freedom ...
    2. Al_lexx
      Al_lexx 30 March 2016 07: 25
      +5
      This is his opinion and it has always been that way. Another thing is that now it coincides with the main trend, in the widest masses. And the fact that he was silent under Yeltsin ... well, so his father was also silent under Stalin, which did not prevent him from writing two texts for our anthem.
      I say this because I know this family a little, not from newspapers and TV. I worked for him, at the moment when the "Fund of Russian Culture" was transferred under his supervision and helped clean it out of crime. It was in the 90s. Then a huge number of architectural monuments of Moscow culture turned into gambling salons and VIP baths.
    3. Al_lexx
      Al_lexx 30 March 2016 07: 25
      0
      This is his opinion and it has always been that way. Another thing is that now it coincides with the main trend, in the widest masses. And the fact that he was silent under Yeltsin ... well, so his father was also silent under Stalin, which did not prevent him from writing two texts for our anthem.
      I say this because I know this family a little, not from newspapers and TV. I worked for him, at the moment when the "Fund of Russian Culture" was transferred under his supervision and helped clean it out of crime. It was in the 90s. Then a huge number of architectural monuments of Moscow culture turned into gambling salons and VIP baths.
    4. mihasik
      mihasik 30 March 2016 07: 41
      +12
      Quote: Severok
      After all, people change. A little, but all the same. At the time of Boris Mikhalkov did not say that - he was silent, now he speaks. It's just not clear - is it his own opinion or did he fulfill a certain "order"?

      And whose "order" was they fulfilled with the construction of the "Yeltsin Center" that even Putin and Medvedev did not fail to attend the opening ceremony?
    5. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 30 March 2016 08: 52
      +5
      Quote: Severok
      Still, people are changing.

      ... depending on the direction of the wind.
      Here Migalkov - like a weather vane.
      Where the wind is, there he is.
      It's my personal opinion.
    6. sherp2015
      sherp2015 30 March 2016 12: 55
      -1
      Quote: Severok
      it is not clear - is this his own opinion or did he fulfill a certain "order"?


      Of course the order.
  • parusnik
    parusnik 30 March 2016 06: 37
    +12
    I am glad .. Mikhalkov, began to cast out demons from himself ... And about 20 years ago he didn’t understand this type ..
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 30 March 2016 08: 10
      +18
      Quote: parusnik
      ..And about 20 years ago, he didn’t understand this type ..

      He understood everything. Cultural workers are like a weather vane.
      1. Cap.Morgan
        Cap.Morgan 30 March 2016 08: 56
        0
        Come on you.
        A talented director, actor ... what a grudge you are.
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 30 March 2016 09: 43
          +16
          Quote: Cap.Morgan
          Talented director, actor ...

          For "Burnt by the Sun" he should be drowned in the outhouse, moreover, together with the discloser of the topic of boobs Bondarchuk.
          In general, the need is needed on a colossal scale, because practically everything that the Russian cinema on the subject of the Great Patriotic War removes does not go into any gates.
          About the last "masterpiece" shown, by the way, on the first TV channel:

          When Panfilov's 28 are released, how long can we wait.
        2. sherp2015
          sherp2015 30 March 2016 12: 58
          +10
          Quote: Cap.Morgan
          A talented director, actor ... what a grudge you are.


          Talented does not mean decent.
          How many talented villains are there in the country ...
          1. Cap.Morgan
            Cap.Morgan 30 March 2016 13: 59
            +3
            Quote: sherp2015
            Quote: Cap.Morgan
            A talented director, actor ... what a grudge you are.


            Talented does not mean decent.
            How many talented villains are there in the country ...

            Is he dishonorable.
            He just raises these questions. Attracts attention to problems.
            Well, they’re just making money, not at all interested in anything.
          2. avia1991
            avia1991 31 March 2016 00: 23
            +2
            Quote: sherp2015
            Talented does not mean decent.

            And how do you determine who is decent and who is not? What are the criteria?
            Right, "one-two-three .."? More?
  • Pencil
    Pencil 30 March 2016 06: 37
    +27
    How so? Nursed on EBN reforms, put CD producers under you and on you? Besogon in the rib? I want to live in socialism, but as a capitalist?
    1. Darkness
      Darkness 30 March 2016 06: 42
      +17
      And a couple of villages with serfs
    2. Oldwiser
      Oldwiser 30 March 2016 13: 47
      0
      About movie figures in the 90s there was such a joke:
      Eldar Ryazanov wants to shoot like Ryazanov, and get - like Fellini
      laughing
      А
      Besogon - rib
      - this is class! For the record!
      1. avia1991
        avia1991 31 March 2016 00: 27
        +1
        Quote: OldWiser
        Eldar Ryazanov wants to shoot like Ryazanov, and get - like Fellini

        What do you want to say: that Ryazanov is nothing compared to Fellini?
        Well, that is, it is not you who are talking, but you are citing this "joke" - quite offensive, by the way! - what does it mean that you agree with the meaning?
    3. Oldwiser
      Oldwiser 30 March 2016 13: 47
      -2
      About movie figures in the 90s there was such a joke:
      Eldar Ryazanov wants to shoot like Ryazanov, and get - like Fellini
      laughing
      А
      Besogon - rib
      - this is class! For the record!
  • avva2012
    avva2012 30 March 2016 06: 38
    +5
    a one-sided (to say the least - a lying) rotten cartoon about the “type” of our history, where Russia is a black, stinking spot that has been saved from the shackles, you see, only Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin.

    The cartoon is actually scary. It is built on one technique called NLP.
    And it is classic! Some kind of tv-ry, creating such a "work", apparently badly realized what It was doing! NLP, due to the force of impact on a person, is completely prohibited in many countries or has restrictions and is used only in medicine. It would be interesting to know what our prosecutor's office thinks about this?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Oorfene Deuce
      Oorfene Deuce 30 March 2016 10: 04
      +4
      It would be interesting to know what our prosecutors think about this?
      Oh, don’t tell ... Are you serious?
      1. avva2012
        avva2012 30 March 2016 10: 19
        +1
        Oh, don’t tell ... Are you serious?

        how to know. Maybe it's zhzhzhzh, not casual? Miаlux, as an indicator of radical change? Here, another evacuation from Turkey. what
    4. sherp2015
      sherp2015 30 March 2016 13: 01
      +7
      Quote: avva2012
      It would be interesting to know what our prosecutors think about this?


      And the prosecutor’s office is spreading the true patriots. For example, article 282 is mainly applied against the Russian people
  • strelets
    strelets 30 March 2016 06: 38
    +8
    After this program, a particularly painful impression remained: we were robbed and betrayed, and no one was punished.
    1. avia12005
      avia12005 30 March 2016 06: 45
      +17
      We were killed, and no one was punished.
      1. bocsman
        bocsman 30 March 2016 11: 12
        +12
        Quote: avia12005
        We were killed, and no one was punished.


        Therefore, I could not watch his programs on these topics. Resentment and hatred of the "figures" of that era and a keen desire to payback for everything they did!
        After all, by and large, what did he say new? Who lived at that time saw and felt all this on himself! Well, maybe we didn’t know any behind-the-scenes nuances, but we felt and understood that treason was happening on an incredible scale, and it was precisely those people who were obliged to observe the interests of the people! And here is not only material wealth and confidence in the future that we have all lost. The most important thing that came to power rubbish killed the morality and spirituality of the people! Destroyed those conquests obtained by the sweat and blood of our ancestors! Giving in exchange the moral of freaks - Steal, rob, enrich yourself by any means! Homeland-trash, the army and even worse, morality for the wimps, etc. But, thank God, Russia somehow survived, endured! It is clear that all this muck is not outlived to the end. But every honest person should strive for this. And no matter what N. Mikhalkov everyone has their own opinion on this subject, but he does it in his programs! It was time to collect stones, apparently the same to him. So I think it is necessary to discuss the topic of the programs, their quality and not the personality of the author. What the author of the article emphasized.
    2. mihasik
      mihasik 30 March 2016 07: 47
      +10
      Quote: strelets
      After this program, a particularly painful impression remained: we were robbed and betrayed, and no one was punished.

      Well, the "Guarantor" said that there would be no revision of "privatization", which means that the "privatizators" would not be touched for "soft" positions, at least under this government.
      1. Cap.Morgan
        Cap.Morgan 30 March 2016 11: 40
        +1
        Quote: mihasik
        Quote: strelets
        After this program, a particularly painful impression remained: we were robbed and betrayed, and no one was punished.

        Well, the "Guarantor" said that there would be no revision of "privatization", which means that the "privatizators" would not be touched for "soft" positions, at least under this government.

        Start touching and they will all run away, and with money, they will close their offices, and the workers will be thrown out into the street. Then the working people get together in gangs and away we go.
        1. mihasik
          mihasik 30 March 2016 17: 39
          +5
          Quote: Cap.Morgan
          Start touching and they will all run away, and with money, they will close their offices, and the workers will be thrown out into the street. Then the working people get together in gangs and away we go.

          Tyk laws that allow you to freely and most importantly uncontrollably withdraw cash abroad with whom was introduced? And why hasn't it been canceled yet? Didn't wonder why they haven't canceled it yet? And on the nose again the elections of "servants of the people" to the State Duma.
          As the saying goes: "Think for yourself, decide for yourself to have or not to have!"
  • Good cat
    Good cat 30 March 2016 06: 39
    +11
    Is it not time for Mr. Vanidze to emigrate?
  • Darkness
    Darkness 30 March 2016 06: 44
    0
    Migalkov, as he was a political "woman of easy virtue, remained.
    Come on, they stopped giving money for "real Keno", so he switched over.
    1. Darkness
      Darkness 30 March 2016 07: 04
      +3
      Tired of Mikhalkov's minus?))))
      1. oborzevatel
        oborzevatel 30 March 2016 08: 56
        +2
        Quote: Darkness
        Tired of Mikhalkov's minus?))))

        Truly so!
        For he was already tired.
        Vane!
      2. arnulla
        arnulla 30 March 2016 12: 31
        +5
        And who plus? Tired of Yeltsin and Chubais?)))
  • X Y Z
    X Y Z 30 March 2016 06: 46
    +19
    Liberators are unable to understand that no amount of the country's highest awards, no construction of pompous memorials, no so-called "Gaidar readings" will change anything. The opinion of the people about the leaders of that era has already taken shape, forever.
    1. de naturat
      de naturat 30 March 2016 06: 59
      +12
      And the opinion is that they were grabbers and traitors, ditching, plundered, sold the country's economy ...
      1. Cap.Morgan
        Cap.Morgan 30 March 2016 11: 45
        +2
        Quote: de Naturat
        And the opinion is that they were grabbers and traitors, ditching, plundered, sold the country's economy ...

        They have an opinion on this opinion.
        Examples. Please.
        All Moscow is discussing the wedding of the son of an Ingush oligarch.
        Western stars, Pugachikha, among salads and omelettes, national dances and fireworks as on Victory Day.
        Where did he get the money? Stolen.
        He suggested how the working masses would react to this? Naturally.
        But he doesn’t care about us.
        Who are we?
        Dust under his boots.
    2. Gray brother
      Gray brother 30 March 2016 08: 26
      0
      Quote: XYZ
      . The opinion of the people about the leaders of that era has already developed, forever.

      Such things are done for the future, for decades. It seems to you now that "forever", and you yourself increasingly hear about "the bloody dictator Stalin", "millions of repressed", "filled up with corpses", "one rifle for three" and about "won not thanks to, but in spite of", but after all, this hurdy-gurdy can be twisted in the other direction, and in 70 years the same beard will go about the "benefactor" Yeltsin.
    3. Executer
      Executer 30 March 2016 11: 47
      +10
      I still remember that in childhood, at the word Gaidar, I had one association:
      "Ships are sailing - Salute to the Boy
      Airplanes are flying .... "
      And now, when I hear this name - nodules on the cheekbones and the hand reaches for the gun!
      And at the word Kasparov once pride arose for the USSR, and now - see about Gaidar.
      The list goes on and on ...
  • aszzz888
    aszzz888 30 March 2016 06: 48
    +9
    I watched these programs. Mikhalkov smashed the liberals to pieces. For the record! good
  • Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 30 March 2016 06: 52
    +12
    For the truth - thanks!
    Finally, these figures are called by their own names: TRAITORS!
  • avva2012
    avva2012 30 March 2016 06: 52
    +2
    It is interesting, and to what extent will society be raised until it comes to real purges of the upper echelons and radical reforms in the economy?
    Mikhalkov (emphasis on "a"), we must pay tribute, the conjuncture with his nose (or something else) a mile away. Under Gorbachev he said one thing, under EBN another. And, what he just said in the program is the undermining of the foundations. All liberal power rested on him (on ideology). Are the times coming? soldier
    PS And this one there? "Ksenia Sobchak, during a regular broadcast on the opposition Internet channel Dozhd, predicted the overthrow of the government in Ukraine and offered to write it down in" vatnitsa ". belay
    1. dauria
      dauria 30 March 2016 18: 55
      +3
      Are the times coming?


      I'm afraid that everything is simpler. Power (real, not a few dolls) is not stupid. Learned to vent excess steam (especially elections). This is what you see.
      1. avia1991
        avia1991 31 March 2016 18: 20
        0
        Quote: dauria
        Learned to vent excess steam (especially elections). This is what you see.

        Where do you see the "bleed off"? This is more about building up pressure! And one day the "pipe" may burst. For questions are being asked addressed to the authorities - those to which the authorities cannot answer directly, since for this they have to recognize themselves as corrupt and treacherous in relation to Russia! ..And the people are waiting for these answers, and without waiting, they may want to come to power - and "ask directly"!
  • sa-ag
    sa-ag 30 March 2016 06: 53
    +12
    you need to be consistent in your views, and at first the Soviet government was good, then Yeltsin, now the current one, Lenin somehow aptly described this phenomenon :-)
    1. Oldwiser
      Oldwiser 30 March 2016 13: 58
      +2
      Quote: sa-ag
      Lenin somehow aptly characterized this phenomenon.

      Is this about Lev Davydovich?
      political prostitute Trotsky
  • Yak28
    Yak28 30 March 2016 07: 05
    +19
    Mikhalkov is an excellent adapter who is good under any government, he was comfortable with the communists, under Yeltsin, under Putin and will be good under any government. As for me, he is a fan of supporting the Kremlin’s policy and the ruling system under any regime. Personally, I don’t like that Putin He didn’t condemn or punish people who ruined the country, plundered state property, fooled people, destroyed the army, undermining the country's defense, on the contrary, Vladimir Vladimirovich builds the Yeltsin Center, defends the interests of the rich, condemns Lenin. Doesn’t Putin see how many illiterate migrant criminals filled large cities, he doesn’t know that prices for everything are constantly rising? And what are the differences in the salaries of superiors and subordinates, rich and poor, conditionally free medicine and education worse than in the 80s. Thanks to the success of foreign policy, you can ignore the affairs of the country
  • rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 30 March 2016 07: 11
    +3
    mold on the body of Russia appeared and pretty grown

    This is a very capacious comparison that fully characterizes the "liberals". Moreover, the mold is a parasite (in the literal sense of the word).
  • Million
    Million 30 March 2016 07: 20
    +5
    The Mikhalkov family can adapt to any power!
    1. Makarov
      Makarov 31 March 2016 13: 33
      +1
      and what about you personally? What power have you not adapted to?
  • Al_lexx
    Al_lexx 30 March 2016 07: 21
    +3
    Yes, N.S. I just noticed everything. I also have a very difficult attitude towards him. I will say more, there was a moment when I worked for him and I know different nuances of his personality. Not all of these nuances are to my liking. But what he does in his programs "Besogon", in my opinion, deserves the most sincere respect from those who really love Russia and root for it.
  • L. A. A.
    L. A. A. 30 March 2016 07: 24
    +5
    Mikhalkov is not ours. Not proletarian.
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 30 March 2016 07: 42
      -1
      Quote: L.A. A.
      Mikhalkov is not ours. Not proletarian.

      Do you want to say that he is not a "proletarian of mental labor"?
    2. Cap.Morgan
      Cap.Morgan 30 March 2016 08: 59
      +2
      Quote: L. A. A.
      Mikhalkov is not ours. Not proletarian.

      Are we flyers?
      To drink vodka and yell thieves' songs behind garages?
      Then fill the face of some passerby.
      It is good that Mikhalkov is not yours.
  • bastard
    bastard 30 March 2016 07: 24
    +5
    I absolutely agree with Yak28, sa-ag, darkness, pencil. N. Mikhalkov is an ordinary domestic political weather vane and opportunist. There were always sloths at the throne.
  • Totalwar
    Totalwar 30 March 2016 07: 30
    +5
    Quote: Nsk 54
    Why a mausoleum when there is already a "Yeltsin Center".


    If the consciousness of society continues to transform at this pace, then soon the "Yeltsin Center" will be renamed into the "Yeltsin Center of Shame"
  • Leprekon
    Leprekon 30 March 2016 07: 45
    +19
    After showing the commercial about the role of the drunk in the history of Russia, I want to "launch what is at hand"! This is exactly the phenomenon of soft power, when in Russia, the descendants of a traitor to the interests of Russia, using the money stolen by this family in due time, are building lifelong "historical" tombs. At the time of Lomonosov, Nemchura rewrote Russian history for herself, now Judas of all stripes have joined this business.
    And the scope then, what scope? The first hall - "The History of Russia from 1914 to 1987 and the History of the Yeltsin Family" - an idol? No Judas! The area of ​​the complex is 85 thousand sq. meters! Almost twice the area of ​​the Winter Palace (45 thousand square meters).
    This should not only surprise, but shock the whole of Russia! And normal Russia should have its say, not the liberals who gave the historical assessment and significance of this "wasp's nest"! Some are right to raise the issue of recognizing Gorbachev and Yeltsin as state traitors.
  • Alexander S.
    Alexander S. 30 March 2016 08: 04
    +8
    By the way ... by the way ... they all say ... hollow government ... officials of traitors ... but why? The opening of the Yeltsin center shows that the era of the 90s ... and those people ... still rule the country. Strongly rule. In the program, this can also be seen. Here Putin is still ... like he just works .. does not destroy the past. And how not to destroy ... how to build the future ... if we are now standing on the rotten foundation of the 90s. No way. The only thing that needs to be saved is a lesson ... in our heads. And the rest ... I’ll clean it up.
    1. udincev
      udincev 30 March 2016 08: 16
      +5
      Quote: Alexander S.
      The only thing that needs to be saved is a lesson ... in our heads. And the rest ... I’ll clean it up.

      It has already been in Russia many times. To the bottom, and then ...
      It is gratifying that Putin, unlike the Yeltsinists, does not depict the history of the righteous one as a black hole, but returns Russia to its place, which has been tormented by its entire history.
      God and people to help him!
      1. Turkir
        Turkir 30 March 2016 08: 25
        +2
        Yes, the builders of the "new" love to clear the site for themselves.
        They just forget that if there is no "foundation", one site is not enough.
        1. Cap.Morgan
          Cap.Morgan 30 March 2016 09: 08
          -2
          How interesting such a clearing is supposed.
          For example, take everything away from everyone. Complete and universal nationalization. So that no more than three rooms and in each workshop was a party.
          Rulers so that everyone can ride a Lada, preferably dress in a cult tunic and overcoat ...
          Yes, the patriarch’s watch haunted many.
          Let him go with the sand.
          And in general - pop.
          Judge him.
          Yes to judge all.
          Because we are all thieves.
          A short course, so to speak.
          The question is, where do we go with all this?
          Yeltsin and Gorbachev are krivoruky y-clans. They are not traitors; they are donkeys and clumsy. The mediocre products of the previous period, where the one who best spoke at meetings and intrigued was exalted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. V.ic
            V.ic 30 March 2016 10: 07
            +3
            Quote: Cap.Morgan
            They are not traitors; they are donkeys and clumsy.

            One did not stop the other, however ...
          3. The comment was deleted.
    2. Grbear
      Grbear 30 March 2016 08: 54
      +1
      Here Putin is still ... like he just works ..does not destroy the past. And how not to destroy ... how to build the future ... if we are now standing on the rotten foundation of the 90s. No way. The only thing that needs to be saved is a lesson ... in our heads. And the rest ... I’ll clean it up.

      Do you need great shocks? ... And we need Great Russia! P.A. Stolypin
      1. Alexander S.
        Alexander S. 30 March 2016 11: 48
        +5
        Great Russia cannot be built on privatization ... everything and everything ... which they are now trying to do again.
        And I'm not talking about all kinds of revolutions ... but about the inevitability of punishment for a crime ... without statute of limitations. And in the 90s they are full of .. at the state level. And for the sake of peace of mind, you can’t turn a blind eye to the actions of thieves and traitors. If you skip the 90s ... then you can also skip the 00s ... and now .. and in the future. It is the habit of the inevitability of punishment that will just help build a great Russia.
  • Turkir
    Turkir 30 March 2016 08: 10
    +10
    Mikhalkov is right in his position. And Besogony is his best film.
    We can only agree with the conclusions of the author of the article Volodin.
    By the way, I'm not a fan of Mikhalkov, but in this case I have to agree with him.
    ---------
    The history of the Yeltsin family on 85 thousand square meters. What small kings we had - the first peters, the second Catherine ... some. They could not build anything worthwhile, oh, no scope.
    Only these queens were able to add thousands of square kilometers to the state, mediocrity.
  • Mangel olys
    Mangel olys 30 March 2016 08: 16
    +7
    Quote: Finches

    And the Mikhalkovs - they lived well under all the rulers - you must be able to do the same! laughing

    That's for sure - like chameleons. But in general, once betrayed, he will betray the next time.
  • Engineer
    Engineer 30 March 2016 08: 26
    +2
    I don’t even recognize this anti-adviser and Russophobe! But behind his door on the back of forgiveness he does not and never will be!
  • Dimy4
    Dimy4 30 March 2016 08: 26
    +2
    ... Persons in power suddenly found themselves for whom a timely call to “friend George” or “Friend Bill” was many times more important than the interests of the people, who turned out to be slandered, loyal and thrown into the throat of a meat grinder called the “transition to democracy”.

    Thanks to all this activity, I apologize for the expression, c.o.dl., the very word "democracy" causes an attack of nausea and a HUGE desire to use foul language.
  • Putnik_16
    Putnik_16 30 March 2016 08: 41
    +4
    There would be more such Mikhalkovs in modern Russian
    reality. Cleverly and competently debunked "exploits"
    the great "reformer" Yeltsin and his friend Gorbachev! hi
  • Crown
    Crown 30 March 2016 08: 56
    +9
    The people will always give an assessment of justice.
  • excomandante
    excomandante 30 March 2016 09: 03
    +7
    Mikhalkov surprises. You will see him in the role of a "talking head" in Besogon - at least write an icon from him. You will see his "great films" - at least put him on a count, Russophobe-anacephalus-zoological anti-Soviet. How it coexists in one person - this secret is great.
    1. Oldwiser
      Oldwiser 30 March 2016 14: 21
      +1
      Quote: excomandante
      this mystery is great there

      Elementary Watson!
      this "great secret" is simply called -
      what you please
    2. Oldwiser
      Oldwiser 30 March 2016 14: 21
      0
      Quote: excomandante
      this mystery is great there

      Elementary Watson!
      this "great secret" is simply called -
      what you please
  • vmo
    vmo 30 March 2016 09: 06
    +6
    Mikhalkov recently even began to watch!)

    Everything is correct, even one dared, for crimes against his country need to be answered.
  • Karayakupovo
    Karayakupovo 30 March 2016 09: 19
    +6
    Mikhalkov turns out, as it were, "One of our own among strangers, a stranger among our own."
    1. Oorfene Deuce
      Oorfene Deuce 30 March 2016 09: 47
      -1
      And you done!
      It is 5+ good
  • Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 30 March 2016 09: 22
    +7
    Oh, no actors need to get into politics. This is how political gains are made.
    1. Shpagolom
      Shpagolom 30 March 2016 10: 34
      +4
      ..so in a world where money rules in a different way ..... there are no values ​​now ... unfortunately!
      Mikhalkov is still a fruit, but do not we care about the questions he raises?
  • Dragon-y
    Dragon-y 30 March 2016 09: 34
    +4
    Let him first return the money that he received for his work from "that" government ...
  • bober1982
    bober1982 30 March 2016 09: 38
    +1
    And here is what A. Prokhanov said in his article: "On the hunting of dogs on Mikhalkov"
    There is a hunt for Mikhalkov. Hunting with flags, with traps, gun hunting .... Beat from a thousand trunks.
    ..... Dear Nikita Sergeevich, do not make excuses, do not seek justice from the frantic crowd.

    As they say, comments are redundant.
  • Mestny
    Mestny 30 March 2016 09: 49
    +2
    Quote: sdc_alex
    Besogon began to watch it too, and you know that the worst is that I will run into how he selects topics for discussion and how he submits material.

    He is a professional of the highest standard. Both the actor and the director.
    Therefore, it turns out, despite the fact. which side he is currently advocating.
    Only one thing is alarming. As much as possible from the bright adherents of liberalism (and his previous films are a bright propaganda of the very thing that is happening in the "Yeltsin Center" and the heads of liberals) will suddenly turn into a patriot-truth-teller.
    Was mistaken, and then received his sight? Well what are you. People of such flight and level of talent are so elementarily not mistaken.
    So the wind of change sensed.
    Well, it’s so with us. While he is saying and writing this now, we are asking for favors.
    ... But as they say, we keep in mind his previous actions. And then suddenly again? the wind of change will smell ...
  • magician
    magician 30 March 2016 09: 54
    +6
    what is most interesting, Mikhalkov does not impose an opinion but states facts, and these facts are real for those who lived and worked in those days. And to draw conclusions to us.
  • then
    then 30 March 2016 09: 54
    +3
    After the collapse of the USSR, they joked that talking in the kitchen destroyed the state. Now it seems that the kitchens are different, but the conversations are about the same. Without getting personal, the latest programs of "Besogon" really deserve attention, why was it necessary to destroy what did not interfere with democratic reforms - education, science, medicine ... Or the liberals could not sacrifice principles - profit at any cost? Finally, at least someone began to speak publicly not about money, but about equally important things - PEOPLE.
  • Wanda
    Wanda 30 March 2016 09: 57
    +6
    He speaks very correctly .. very. Effectively, strictly, informatively ..
  • Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 30 March 2016 10: 07
    +4
    It’s good that the Russian liberals were rebuffed by such famous people as N. Mikhalkov.
    After all, before so many thought, but were afraid to talk about it publicly.
    They were afraid of the reactions of the West, first of all.
    Now the times have changed. For every blather of the liberals, a response destroying them appears ...
  • barsik92090
    barsik92090 30 March 2016 10: 07
    0
    Although I can’t stand Svanidze, I completely agree with his expression regarding Mikhalkov.
    You have to beg for the filming of the next absolutely unattainable "opuses", with the involvement of the entire Migalkov family. [/ Quote]
    Not everything is measured in money, that for 25 years the "democrats" drummed into you, there are still feelings of patriotism and justice among people, even among the successful, horrified by the result of the "tricks" of rotten, corrupt "democrats" that they immortalize in the Center of Traitors to Russia.
  • engineer
    engineer 30 March 2016 10: 23
    +6
    I do not believe Mikhalkov. The conjuncturist.
    1. Bulrumeb
      Bulrumeb 30 March 2016 12: 46
      +8
      That's for sure, Mikhalkov himself is the fruit
      1. clidon
        clidon 30 March 2016 19: 18
        +1
        If the Americans had seized the Kremlin, this gentleman would have been one of the first to come and seek for the position. "Not we such, Life is such". Barin.
  • Sergey824
    Sergey824 30 March 2016 10: 30
    +4
    I watched the programs of Mikhalkov, this one too. What are we discussing, the author or the program, or rather the topic of the issue? The author can love or not, a private matter. But to the topic, to the transfer, the approach should be different, it seems to me. It is important for us, it takes for the soul, does it find a response? I think so! Then, thanks to him.
  • Military Builder
    Military Builder 30 March 2016 10: 33
    +2
    Nikita Sergeevich, honestly, I just can’t rank myself as an ardent admirer of your work (as the director of most films) of recent times (it just so happened - I can’t help myself), but for Besogon TV and for the topics that are in this program your team go up, thanks! For the truth - thanks!
    + + + + + + + + + + + +
  • Alfa-jet
    Alfa-jet 30 March 2016 10: 48
    +6
    Thanks again to Mikhalkov! In fact, he showed the activities and state policies of Yeltsin, which caused tremendous damage to Russia and that we still disentangle it. He committed a crime against our people.
  • syndicalist
    syndicalist 30 March 2016 10: 57
    +2
    Quote: udincev
    and it returns Russia to its place that has been tormented by all its history.

    So far, the return is elsewhere. Here is Madame Vasilyeva, for example, returns the acquired back-breaking labor http://www.mk.ru/social/2015/09/29/sud-vernul-vasilevoy-kartiny-no-ostalnoe-imus
    hhestvo-ostavil-pod-arestom.html
  • user3970
    user3970 30 March 2016 11: 39
    +6
    First, with regards to Mikhalkov ... All in dad. Service to the existing government. When I tried to make historical films, professionals, historians wrote with boiling water. But if you follow the chronology of events (the Belovezhskaya Agreements and the collapse of a great country for the sake of achieving personal and absolute power, and then a call to the owner "did I do the right thing?"). But let us continue the chronology of the latest historical events ... "I am leaving ..." Borya was a brute with an animal instinct for self-preservation. He could not transfer power to a random person. This means that the Semya organized crime group has iron arguments that allow him to hold his balls with a stranglehold. I remember the first two decrees of the Great Patriotic War, when he changed the war. 1) on the non-prosecution of Yobn and his family members under criminal laws; 2) on the redemption of Sibneft shares (at the time of sale with a market value of $ 500 million) for $ 13,8 billion with Gazprom's money. Considering that Sibneft was owned by Roma Abramovich - the purse of the Semya organized crime group. And further . When ebn, after four heart attacks, became a vegetable, the country was ruled by the so-called seven bankers. Isn't that what we are seeing in Russia now? And the construction of the FUCKING memorial is it not a fact that the most sensitive was pressed on the wow?
    1. Captain nemo
      Captain nemo 30 March 2016 14: 51
      0
      Quote: user3970
      1) about not prosecuting Ebn and his family members under criminal laws

      Well, he is not a "man" or what?
      He also wants to see him, so that he would not be persecuted when he is physically blown away and he is not persecuted for "what have you done."
      And further . When ebn after four heart attacks became a vegetable, the country was driven by the so-called seven-bankers. Now we are not observing this in Russia?

      No, this is not because for people like Vova and Generalisimus Stalin money really does not matter. They are higher than money, they print them for others to manage them, but not for themselves.
    2. Captain nemo
      Captain nemo 30 March 2016 14: 51
      0
      Quote: user3970
      1) about not prosecuting Ebn and his family members under criminal laws

      Well, he is not a "man" or what?
      He also wants to see him, so that he would not be persecuted when he is physically blown away and he is not persecuted for "what have you done."
      And further . When ebn after four heart attacks became a vegetable, the country was driven by the so-called seven-bankers. Now we are not observing this in Russia?

      No, not for this, because for people like Vova and Generalisimo Stalin, money really does not matter and my opinion is 100% they are really right. They are above money, they print them for others to control others, but not for themselves, because they were chosen by the "people".