Military Review

Does the “Russian nationalists” need Crimea?

35
Does the “Russian nationalists” need Crimea?Each region of Russia has its own “Russian nationalism”. There is no common “Russian nationalism” in Russia, as well as the generally accepted “Russian patriotism”. Worse, the “Russian nationalists” of different directions are not only not friendly, but also have no common basic values. Well, the same concept can not be called by the fans of the “right sector”, or “navalisty”, and “krymnashisty”.


The Crimea, the attitude towards its return to Russia, quite accurately showed that today's “Russian nationalism” had exhausted itself, ordered a long life, something else had to come in its place. If you have time.

March 18 is the only day of the year when you can say something important and be heard by the maximum number of people, when you can deploy your flags and don’t shake a fine for it or worse. The authorities of Tatarstan, for example, understand this well, and according to this, they did not allow representatives of the Russian public to the Kazan "Crimean" rally "We Are Together", about which the RNL wrote a year ago.

A year ago, Kazan nevertheless came, and stood at the fence that fenced the rally site, and expressed support for the Russian Donbass and rejection of the fascist ideology. They came this year, as evidenced by the video of Mikhail Shcheglov.

But the so-called “Russian nationalists” from other regions of Russia ignore the Crimean rallies. Why? The main reasons are two “zashkvvar” and “It is impossible to celebrate the Crimea, looking at what we did with the Donbas”. In the Donbas, of course, terrible things are happening. But how justified is youthful maximalism like “all or nothing”? “Crimeans are lucky, congratulations to them, very happy for them. But they are not ready to sing and dance over the unmourned and unrequited corpses of those who are not so lucky. ” It is very colorful, but not without distortion, and, more importantly, without answering the pressing question: how will the refusal of the support of the inhabitants of Crimea help the people of New Russia? And how to properly mask their inability to scale active real actions under the touching care of the inhabitants of New Russia?

Especially since the residents of Novorossia 18 March were celebrated! In Pervomaisk Square on the central square of Donetsk gathered about three thousand people. Head of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) Alexander Zakharchenko, chairman of the People’s Council Denis Pushilin, mayor of the capital of the DPR Igor Martynov spoke at the rally. Zakharchenko recalled that the Crimea two years ago was the first to stand up "to fight fascism." The events were observed by the residents of Donbass and were happy when the Crimeans managed to achieve the goal, the head of the DPR said.

The response of the “Russian nationalists” is staggering. “They were forced!” - explain “Russian nationalists” the approval by Donbassians of the return of the Crimea. These people? Made? How do you need not respect the Donbassians to suggest this.

Region region discord, I own the situation in Bashkiria.

On the eve, the Ufimets Mark Sagadatov lucidly explains why caring Ufa people who love Russia need to come to the rally:

- Need to go. Everybody. At least in order to show that we are the people of Russia FOR the restoration of our Fatherland. This should see everything. And the President, and the liberal community, and our enemies and our friends. It is important. It works. I remember how in 2012, the brain exploded from the liberal public from millions of queues to the Belt of the Most Holy Theotokos. They could not believe that there are so many people in Russia, the overwhelming majority in reality, living in a different, different from them, reality. Now they say that Russia does not need Crimea, and that the Russians do not support the idea of ​​reunification. They are lying. As usual. Because when they lie, they say theirs. And on our side of the truth. Therefore, we must go out Anyone who is for Russia.

Because of this call, or because of some other, but some representatives of the Russian public came to this rally. A young girl, a writer, a representative of the parent community. Not all of them consider themselves to be Russian nationalists. NOD-sheep came (in each region this movement has its own essential features), and with them a resident of Donbass. He, a resident of Donbass, knows better - is it possible to celebrate the Crimea, looking at what was done with his native Donbas.

But some of the Ufa "Russian nationalists," that is, a small group that claims to represent all Russian nationalists, and indeed Russians in Bashkiria, explained their unwillingness to participate in this event by saying that "if the Russian Spring was renamed the Crimean authorities, then, apparently, Russians have no place on this celebration of life. ” These people seriously believe that their refusal of public approval of the return of the Crimea to Russia will somehow help the situation in the Donbas. A simple fact does not fit in their intellectual heads: the maximum approval of the reunification of Crimea with Russia will contribute, and not prevent the indefinite postponement of reunification with Russia of Donbass, as well as Odessa, Kharkov, which they allegedly bake so zealously.

Here we need to take into account regional realities. If Ufa's “Russian nationalists” could at this time, here and now, carry out certain mass actions, fully support Novorossia and the Crimea, actively and effectively express the interests of Russian Bashkiria, then, of course, they absolutely would have nothing to do at the Ufa rally “ For the Crimea "according to their highly moral aspirations.

But what do we see in practice? The lonely, somewhat abstract poster of a two-year-old “Russian of Ukraine, we are with you!”, Who attended the 9 picket in March of 2014, is now giving them a shrewery for today's approval of the return of the Crimea. It’s time to think, but is it, approval of the annexation of the Crimea by the so-called “Russian nationalists”?

The current scope of the actions of the Ufa "Russian nationalists" can be judged by how they celebrated on November 4 on the 2015 of the year. In the evening of November 3, 3 people attended the NOD event, two of them eagerly took pictures under Putin’s portrait (there’s nothing wrong with that). November 8 more than 20-ti, but less than 30-ti people gathered on the outskirts of Ufa in a deserted place, away from passers-by, with imperials, but without slogans, knocking, muttering, dispersed. It's all! This is the most massive event of the Ufa "Russian nationalists" over the past year, except for the laying on of flowers 2 in May 2015 of the year in memory of those who died in Odessa, held mostly by ordinary Ufimians and all the same NOD-sheep.

What could the “Russian nationalists” of Ufa get by attending the March 18 rally in a more or less organized way?

Try to speak publicly. The texts of the speeches at the rally were very different, the communists, for example, were asked a completely reasonable and important question for Ufa: “Why is one of the main streets of Ufa, 2007, still bears the name of Turkish citizen Ahmetzaki Validov, who wanted to defeat our country in World War II? .

Demonstrate something from their attributes and slogans to a large, really large number of people, not only the elderly, but also young people, since students represented most of the rally participants? Declare - we are! We are for the Crimea and Novorossia!

Experiences for Novorossia from the Ufa "Russian nationalists" are wonderful. But lately, in what concrete way have these experiences been expressed? How much humanitarian supplies were sent by them in the last six months? How many funds raised? How many shares held?

And it would be okay if ignoring the 18 rally in May would be caused by a special scrupulousness - well, these elevated, crystal clear souls cannot otherwise. So there is no, just these “Russian nationalists” are not particularly picky, since their scrupulousness didn’t prevent them from walking with the Imperials in the same system, in the same column with the Bashkir national separatists in the form of Kuk-Bure and GMS , Navalny fans, the Left Front and the same Communists. How is it that “conscience” does not allow them to speak out for the Crimea, but in the same column with the portrait of Navlny and the “Valid” flag - does it allow?

Each region has its own characteristics - its Russian nationalists, its nodovtsy, even their "Yabloko". One Ufimets, close to Yabloko, was also at the rally "We are together," greeted. “Do you need anything here?” I asked, not quite politely. “I need to show that I, in spite of everything, are glad that the Crimea is in Russia,” answered the yablok, a good-natured, no longer young Tatar named Raphael. And how can you not remember that among other things we were with him when raising our regional issues - at the Avrony Kronoshpan plant, on educational problems of teaching Russian ...

I have a very reverent attitude to the “imperka”. From my ladies' shoulders, her 4 November 2014, the police tried to take off - was not given. But lately, I have noticed with regret for myself - our urgent regional problems, including the problems of the Russians, are more actively raised by anyone, but not waving imperials by the “Russian nationalists”. There is something to think about, is not it?

What to do? Yes, all the same - to find common points of contact, while they are, and work on common topics. Perhaps the maximalists will someday understand that “singing and dancing over corpses” and showing approval for the return of the Crimea are not the same thing. Perhaps, I will understand something from the fact that I do not understand now. On all God's will.
Author:
Originator:
http://ruskline.ru/special_opinion/2016/mart/nuzhen_li_krym_russkim_nacionalistam/
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Shtyn dwarf
    Shtyn dwarf 29 March 2016 12: 24
    +6
    "Each region has its own peculiarities - its own Russian nationalists, its own Nodovites, even its own Yabloko people."
    ---
    all mixed in one heap. NOD members are not a party, they are those who recognize that Russia is in a semi-occupation, and set as their goal sovereignty. If Yabloko admits these problems, then he is also a Nodovite.
    1. Pravdarm
      Pravdarm 29 March 2016 12: 41
      +7
      I think the author is a provocateur-liberal, from NovoDvorsky Innovation Oppositionists.
      today's “Russian nationalism” has exhausted itself, ordered to live long, something else should come in its place. If you have time.
      What is “Russian nationalism” ?!
      The authorities of Tatarstan, for example, understand this well, and therefore did not let representatives of the Russian public attend the Kazan “Crimean” rally “We Together”, which RNL wrote about a year ago.
      But the so-called "Russian nationalists" from other regions of Russia ignore the Crimean rallies.
      Oh how! You know everything (the same) about other regions too ?!
      unanswered question: how will it help the residents of New Russia, the refusal to support the inhabitants of the Crimea? (what a rejection? what inhabitants?) And how right to mask their inability to large-scale active real actions under the touching care of the inhabitants of New Russia? (what is this for dirt?) The response of the “Russian nationalists” is staggering. “They made them!” (Who answered this ???) - “Russian nationalists” explain the Donbass approval for the return of Crimea. These people? Forced? So how do you not respect the Donbass people to suggest this.(what is this for Kasparov?)

      Here you need to take into account regional realities. If Ufa "Russian nationalists"(who are they? could at this time, here and now, carry out some mass actions, fully support Novorossia and Crimea, actively and effectively express the interests of the Russians of Bashkiria, then, of course, they would have absolutely nothing to do at the Ufa rally “For Crimea” according to their high moral aspirations .

      All God's will.

      In short, is it not God Rylsk has come to us ?! laughing
      1. gergi
        gergi 29 March 2016 13: 32
        +3
        A clear provocation.
        1. Mahmut
          Mahmut 29 March 2016 14: 11
          +1
          Skinhead, how much in this sound has merged for the Russian heart. Author's rights. There are no Russian nationalists, and there never were. They were not on the side of the Russians either in the first or in the second Chechen war, nor were they among the defenders of Donbass. All their belligerence and bravery ends at a deserted stop, where a lone migrant worker can be stumbled with impunity with impunity. They do not suffer from pride for their country, but they are very arrogant. Recently, they have generally developed a fad to accept Islam, explaining their decision by the fact that they see power in it. That is, the complex of another "Russian" hero named Trufaldino (and I am always for those who win) is no less close to them than the image of Adik Hitlerov, whose birthday they celebrate with such passion every April.
          1. Boos
            Boos 29 March 2016 19: 04
            0
            Why interfere with German National Socialism with Russian national consciousness? I am a Russian nationalist and have the right to reject what is foreign to my people. And the "skinheads" were created to provocate and discredit the Russian people, by the "hunchbacked" themselves ... The time will come, Mahmud ...))) Let's laugh, the Russian people will shake off the parasites who have arrived and are fattening for added value under the guise of diasporas and thieving officials ...
      2. Lelek
        Lelek 29 March 2016 17: 40
        +1
        Quote: Pravdarm
        In short, didn’t Bozhena Rylsk come to us ?!


        Very similar even, but the signature is clearly invented. yes
    2. 79807420129
      79807420129 29 March 2016 12: 53
      +10
      Quote: Shtynsky Dwarf
      NOD members are not a party, they are those who recognize that Russia is in a semi-occupation, and set sovereignty as their goal. If Yabloko admits these problems, then he is also a Nodovite.

      That’s interesting, but Navalny, Kasyanov and other riflemen are NODovtsy or not? requestWell, yes, Lenya Goizman with Grishka Otrepyev, oh, excuse me; are Yavlinsky such cool Yabloko Nodovtsi? belay
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 29 March 2016 13: 11
      +1
      If Crimea did not take Dzhemilev, to whom the Turks sponsored about 5 bucks for that, then where are our nationalists laughing The Apple Majlis somehow does not even channel.
    5. avt
      avt 29 March 2016 15: 42
      +1
      Quote: Shtynsky Dwarf
      all mixed in one heap. NOD members are not a party, they are those who recognize that Russia is in a semi-occupation, and set as their goal sovereignty. If Yabloko admits these problems, then he is also a Nodovite.

      I actually saw this "mighty" heap with my own eyes on Bolotnaya and Arbat in Moscow. In fact, everyone mingled in the ecstasy of a single impulse against the Kremlin tyrant - the "Yabloko", "Navalners" with the late Borisik, who joined them. pavement, "homosexuals with rainbow banners for a couple of nationalists with the imperial tricolor. Here Strelkov / Girkin Malek was late with his committee on January 25. Well, nothing, although he lost Pedichka Limonov on the way, he will catch up, here he will sew a banner with the image of the new Tsar Michael of Kent, Well, when Belkovsky through Prosvirin there, or Ksyusha Sobchak will give Michaela a photo, in order to know what to embroider on a banner, then he will immediately catch up with the fighters against the regime. Do not even doubt. They wrote to you here that this Denikin plum, who was offended after the reconstruction, will be picked up and will certainly be put into politics like that.
  2. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 29 March 2016 12: 26
    +8
    Our Crimea and that’s it. People for the most part supported the accession. The Russian people are the most divided people in the world. What kind of nationalists can be, what rallies are there. Nationalists should be least concerned about this connection. Because with the accession of Crimea, there was a big decision spiritual problems of a large number of the Russian population. They never tire of repeating with tears in their eyes that they had been waiting for accession all these years. And there was also a huge problem in the danger of the NATO fleet entering and crowding out its fleet. Therefore, nationalists and reasons for rallies should not have questions here. Not for the Ufa or for any other regions. There are regional problems. By the way, nationalists are not very willing to know about social projects. They can only go out and scream at the authorities. A typical nationalist is average. a shaven-headed man dodging armies at football stadiums, secretly dreaming of a clean race. Such nationalists definitely do not need the country and their opinions should absolutely not bother anyone. Often organizations use these antisocial elements to lure them with loud slogans. But then wear the badges and national flags and a pub with songs combined with regular receptions at local police departments for petty hooliganism and planting of some frostbitten, openly tangled shores.
    1. sherp2015
      sherp2015 29 March 2016 15: 19
      +3
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      Our Crimea and that’s it. People for the most part supported the accession. The Russian people are the most divided people in the world. What kind of nationalists can be, what rallies are there. Nationalists should be least concerned about this connection. Because with the accession of Crimea, a large spiritual problem was solved in large numbers. Russian population. They never tire of repeating with tears in their eyes that they had been waiting for accession all these years. And there was also a huge problem in the danger of the NATO fleet entering and crowding out its fleet. Therefore, nationalists and reasons for rallies should not have questions here. Not for the Ufa or for any other regions. There are regional problems. By the way, nationalists are not very willing to know about social projects. They can only go out and scream at the authorities. A typical nationalist is average. a shaven-headed man dodging armies at football stadiums, secretly dreaming of a clean race. Such nationalists definitely do not need the country and their opinions should absolutely not bother anyone. Often organizations use these antisocial elements to lure them with loud slogans. But then wear the badges and national flags and a pub with songs combined with regular receptions at local police departments for petty hooliganism and planting of some frostbitten, openly tangled shores.

      We must always figure out who is the leader of the so-called "Russian" nationalists.
      If there are people like the Belovs (Potkins) in Russia, or such "broads" as the Tyagniboks (Frotmans) in Ukraine, then everything becomes clear ...
      What to hide if the so-called "God-chosen" head (with the help of funding from abroad) any national movement, then nothing good can be expected from this leadership. They will certainly lead the people into some kind of "shit ... s ... mo", provoke some kind of "St. Bartholomew's night", "set fire to the Reichstag", shed blood and lead them to be shot. You can never trust such leaders, in 99% of cases they are paid provocateurs on the part of the Western special services or on the part of the authorities (for example, the Yeltsin ones in 93, when the parliament was shot)
  3. Lukich
    Lukich 29 March 2016 12: 32
    +4
    Perhaps the maximalists will someday realize that “singing and dancing over the corpses” and showing approval for the return of Crimea is far from the same thing

    typical liberal fraud and freaks. any arguments come into play. the ethical side of the issue does not bother them at all
  4. Altona
    Altona 29 March 2016 12: 33
    +2
    "Russian nationalists" are a sect, such a symbiosis of Vlasovites and monarchists, and of football fans, for them the distinction is close with and without. Because it is not clear how to consider this phenomenon? Are chromosomes and haploids measured?
    1. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 29 March 2016 15: 34
      +1
      Quote: Altona
      "Russian nationalists" are a sect, such a symbiosis of Vlasovites and monarchists, and of football fans, for them the distinction is close with and without. Because it is not clear how to consider this phenomenon? Are chromosomes and haploids measured?


      I agree with you. Russian nationalists in the sense that they know: football fans, skins, etc., are the grave-diggers of the Russian world. Before Maidan, the Russian nationalists were friends with the Ukrainian openly, and did not even plan to open their branches in Kharkov, Donetsk, Odessa, in order to do their famous Russian jogging.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 March 2016 12: 34
    +3
    Frankly, I personally found the article chaotic.
    He, a resident of Donbass, knows better - is it possible to celebrate Crimea, looking at what has been done with his native Donbass.

    But this author's twist is not entirely clear. Probably you need to understand the author as follows - how can you mark "Crimea is our" when Donbass has not been annexed to Russia?
  6. Lopatov
    Lopatov 29 March 2016 12: 35
    +2
    These are not "nationalists", it is not known what. Kargokult, imitation of Europeans.

    Historically, real Russian nationalism had Pan-Slavism as its defining idea. And the attitude towards foreigners (except for the Jews) was different, not European-prohibitive, but messianic. "We have a higher culture, and therefore we will teach to live correctly"
    1. Odysseus
      Odysseus 29 March 2016 13: 53
      0
      Quote: Spade
      These are not "nationalists", it is not known what. Kargokult, imitation of Europeans

      Exactly. It’s the Cargocult.
      Quote: Spade
      Historically, true Russian nationalism has had Pan-Slavism as its defining idea.

      And this is not true, pan-Slavism is not related to nationalism in any of its 3 forms.
  7. Abbra
    Abbra 29 March 2016 12: 39
    +1
    So, dear Catherine, have information about Bashkiria. It is at least strange to draw cool conclusions from this. The most striking manifestation of "Russian nationalists" was called at one time the "Black Hundred", if you know the history. I myself was born in Bashkiria. As a child, I had awesome friends: Andrey, Rifat, Sashka and Azat. Many, very many can agree with Mona: "Russian nationalism" is the same as "Papuan imperialism." There is no such thing in Russia.
    1. fif21
      fif21 29 March 2016 13: 10
      -1
      Quote: Abbra
      Many, very many can agree with Mona: "Russian nationalism" is the same as "Papuan imperialism." There is no such thing in Russia

      Unfortunately there is what And in such a multi-national and multi-confessional country like Russia, this is a threat to the country's security. I do not see an "ostrich position" on this issue, so no, it is fraught with the fact that one day you will wake up in a country where the "Fuhrer" is in power, who will declare Russia for the Russians and Russia will "drown" in blood.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. family tree
    family tree 29 March 2016 12: 44
    +7
    Come on them, Natsiks. Mnu, there are all Russians in the family, except for the grandfather, the Chuvash, the foreman of the mortar, who passed two wars and was demobilized from Norway due to injury, in 45. And Cho, I got such a splash when I said, after the toast "to the Slavs," that the Chuvash, like a Turk, and not from grandfather, from dad, but dad is a blacksmith, rural, without any bells and whistles there, palm, just about my confusion. In general, when I got out from under the table, I knew firmly that Russian, this is not a nationality, this is a state of mind what And then after all, you can be born in Russia, and become non-Russia, and on the other hand, examples of darkness
    1. Abbra
      Abbra 29 March 2016 12: 51
      +2
      Damn, there would be an opportunity, would put about ten pluses. But one remark: there are Russians, and there are Russians. One smoothly flows into another, and it warms the Russian soul.

      Let any Russian leave and warm his culture. After that, the "melting pot" in New York will have to go en masse to explore the Kolyma.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  9. Patriot 771
    Patriot 771 29 March 2016 12: 56
    0
    "A typical nationalist middle peasant. A swollen, smoking, skinhead, evading army, breaking armchairs at football stadiums, secretly dreaming of the purity of the race. These nationalists are definitely not needed by the country and absolutely no one should care about their opinion. Often organizations and use such antisocial elements enticing to themselves with loud slogans. " It was these Banderlogists who did nothing and arranged everything that happened in Kiev and Odessa. They are absolutely purple whose Crimea. There is no Russian nationalism, all this is nonsense of those who keep the so-called "nats" in sight and in the zone of influence. The longer we have this swamp to mature, the more painful the cleaning will be. Like this.
    1. Abbra
      Abbra 29 March 2016 13: 01
      0
      There is only one offer - of all Natsik - to separate companies of the construction battalion! Called STROYNATSBAT. And let them build a big road from Krasnoyarsk to Chukotka.
  10. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 29 March 2016 13: 04
    +1
    if only an example, the author gave specific representatives of these people. And then some abstract "Russian nationalists" - about whom the article, everyone should think out for himself
  11. Friends
    Friends 29 March 2016 13: 04
    +4
    Another throw-in of liberalistic "analytics".
  12. kashtak
    kashtak 29 March 2016 13: 12
    +2
    whom does the author generally define as nationalists? do you welcome the reunification with the Crimea, then a nationalist? Catherine, you were wrong. even more dubious look statements like "Each region has its own characteristics - its own Russian nationalists, its own Nodovites, even its own" Yabloko people "" Something that immediately reminded me of the statements I read in the early nineties that there are no Soviet patriots, in each republic, they say patriots. picking up old cliches?
  13. siberalt
    siberalt 29 March 2016 13: 13
    +2
    Quote: siberalt
    If Crimea did not take Dzhemilev, to whom the Turks sponsored about 5 bucks for that, then where are our nationalists laughing The Apple Majlis somehow does not even channel.

    Dzhemilev's modest estate in the Crimea. No one knows where and by whom he generally worked during his life and where he got the money for the "house".
  14. Friends
    Friends 29 March 2016 13: 21
    +5
    It seems that the author wants to pass off the small-town Nazism, individual groups, for Russian nationalism

    Quote: Spade
    Historically, true Russian nationalism has had Pan-Slavism as its defining idea.


    100%.
  15. sergeyzzz
    sergeyzzz 29 March 2016 13: 22
    +3
    Late rushing about is needed - not needed, it's Russian and period!
  16. Odysseus
    Odysseus 29 March 2016 13: 48
    +2
    The Russians have historically developed as a "universal" imperial people, and not as a bourgeois civilian nation.
    Therefore, "Russian nationalism" is an oxymoron, like dry water, that is why under "Russian nationalism" is meant anything, and various people call themselves that, from neoliberal supporters of the collapse of the Russian Federation to monarchists and imperials.
    This is not to mention the fact that nationalism itself is of 3 types - civil, ethnic, "indigenous" (for countries of the 3rd capital of the world).
  17. Fotoceva62
    Fotoceva62 29 March 2016 13: 50
    0
    Does Crimea and Sevastopol need “Russian Nationalists”? The question is not posed correctly, if not needed, then these are some other nationalists!
    In general, the main thing is that ... this city has come back ... (Gorodnitsky).
    The Russian lands have reunited, we Sevastopol residents have returned home to Russia, and the opinion of the “Russians” or other nationalists does not concern us much.
  18. Corvetkapitan
    Corvetkapitan 29 March 2016 13: 56
    +1
    If the author did not understand, or did not want to understand the essence of the issue, I will explain point by point. 1) A fan of the Right Sector cannot be a Russian nationalist. The slogan of the Right Sector is “she's at her knives,” and the pits mean the Russians. If there are fans of the Right Sector in Russia, then these are not Russians, they are dill lost in Russia, which is high time to be deported from Russia to their historical homeland, to Lvov. The Right Sector and similar organizations fought against Russia in the Caucasus, on the side of Dudayev's Islamic terrorists, killed Russians and only a non-distant person can call these bandits Russians. For example, the RNU and the NBP officially announced their crusade against the Bandera and supported the Donbass not only in word, but also with detachments of volunteers. Not a single real Russian will support the geeks who fought in the Caucasus against Russia. 2) Navalny is the new Gorbachev, the six of the United States and not one Russian nationalist will support such a person. Russian nationalists stand for a strong and independent Russia and the six of the United States, like Navalny, will not find support among them. 3) Donbass is a big stupidity of the Russian government, for which you will have to pay dearly. Not only does Russia feed the destroyed Donbass and rebuild it at its own expense, all negotiations with Bandera predictably do not yield any results. Banderovets is a mad dog, and the sooner the Russian government and Putin personally understands this, the better. Negotiations with the Banderaites are useless, and the Bandera regime in Ukraine will pose a threat to Russia until the end of its existence.
  19. Karayakupovo
    Karayakupovo 29 March 2016 14: 06
    +2
    The heap is small. Here and "Kronospan", where many locals stupidly wanted to raise the cost of their plots for sale for the plant, and about the Crimea. Crimea was, is and will be OURS. Ufa and Bashkirin. (My own uncle lived and was buried in Voroshilovgrad-Lugansk.)
  20. Maksim
    Maksim 29 March 2016 16: 52
    +2
    Author, did you even read the article after writing? Can you retell? laughing
  21. Gunther
    Gunther 29 March 2016 17: 12
    0
    Quote: Mahmut
    .... there are no
    there were no Russian nationalists.

    Interestingly, who is imprisoned under Article 282 and why she was nicknamed "Russian"? Writer Yuri Mukhin, who, together with his comrades-in-arms, has been pressed for six months, he is of course an extremist (like Kvachkov) and extremism has no nationality)))
    1. romandostalo
      romandostalo 29 March 2016 23: 58
      0
      Not for half a year, but much longer ...
  22. Korsar4
    Korsar4 29 March 2016 19: 04
    0
    That is why Ivan Kalita has remained in history. Collector. I want to believe that the time has ended for scattering.
  23. romandostalo
    romandostalo 29 March 2016 23: 57
    0
    What a very one-sided view of Russian nationalism ...
  24. kit_bellew
    kit_bellew 30 March 2016 00: 06
    0
    I did not understand a bolt.
    What does the transfer of Crimea from the jurisdiction of today's Ukraine (nationalist without any reservations) to the jurisdiction of Russia have to "Russian nationalism" in Ufa? What is "Russian nationalism" in general?
    People, as best they could, escaped the criminal regime of Poroshenko-Yaytsenyukh-Pravosekov, and even then: either they will bring down the power line, or sabotage the construction of the bridge. And the Majlis, most importantly, e-my - the Majlis! What does nationalism have to do with it? It turns out interestingly: you are being slaughtered and killed - this is "the right of small peoples to self-determination." You are defending yourself - this is nationalism, great-power chauvinism, and so on and so forth. It's your fault that I want to eat © IA Krylov.
    PS: TP should not be allowed to publish. I like this site, and I think, not just me. There is no need to fuck him.
  25. zippelin
    zippelin 31 March 2016 01: 12
    0
    IMHO article provocative nonsense. 18 came to Krasnodar for a rally, there were a lot of people who came to support Crimea. And we have Russian nationalists in our region and are no different from Russian nationalists in the Rostov region.