Military Review

Project "ZZ". Hillary Clinton spawned the IG, and the Russians saved humanity

68
Republican Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, told Fox News about the ugly foreign policy role of Hillary Clinton. In his opinion, this lady is responsible for the emergence of the "Islamic State". Moreover, the ex-mayor called her one of the founders of "IG". Another person from the former category, former US ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, told the Russians "thank you" for freeing Palmyra from terrorists. Statements from Western officials also came in: Frank-Walter Steinmeier, the German foreign minister, said that a cease-fire agreement in Syria and the beginning of peace talks would have been impossible without Russia's constructive engagement.




Statements on the involvement of Hillary Clinton to the "creation" of the Islamic State terrorist organization Republican Rudi (Rudolph) Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, made on the television channel Fox News. From the TV show The O'Reilly Factor, it migrated to some popular American newspapers.

The former mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani, noted in the article "The Daily Caller", said that "Hillary Clinton can be considered one of the founders of" IG ".

At first, Giuliani seriously attacked the B. H. Obama administration on air: he reminded the public that the president was at a baseball game in Cuba immediately after the terrorist attack in Brussels.

Then the speaker hit a potential presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Speaking about her, Mr. Giuliani noted that the former secretary of state “had a chance” to develop a strategy to combat IS, but instead of implementing a suitable plan, “she helped create an IS”.

According to Juliani, Hillary Clinton can be considered "one of the founders of" IG ".

To Mr. O'Reilly's question about how exactly she “helped create the IG,” Giuliani replied: “As part of the administration that left Iraq.” According to the Republican, the Iraqi Shiites under the leadership of Nuri al-Maliki could play a positive role in that situation.

In addition, the ex-mayor explained that H. Clinton "at the appropriate time did not intervene in the situation in Syria."

"The Salon" quotes the lead O'Reilly.

He tried to be "fair and objective" and noticed that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "could not force Barack Obama to do something." “The only thing,” the moderator said, “what she could do was resign.”

On air Fox News a few days ago there was another program, where the same host commented on the last performance of Hillary Clinton herself.

Unfortunately, the TV presenter noted, the majority of Western leaders are afraid to oppose the IS forces in Iraq, Syria, and now in Libya. Politicians point to the fiasco of the Western struggle in Iraq and the huge problems in Afghanistan. It is these “reasons” that force Western politicians to abandon the “major confrontation” with Islamic radicals and murderers. O'Reilly himself believes that if you do not resist the power of these "savages", the world will continue to suffer from terrorism. And terrorism "will never cease."

Hillary Clinton just talked about terrorism - she spoke publicly about the threat of "IG". O'Reilly, who had listened to her speech at Stanford University on the eve, however, did not find any specifics there.

“Today we analyzed the presentation of Ms. Clinton and could not find there any indications of specific actions,” the moderator directly commented. - She offered to defeat the savages "IG"? Not at all! Instead, she used the ground to attack Republicans. ”

“It would also be a serious mistake to start carpet bombing settlements…”, Clinton noted, further declaring that the slogans themselves are “not a strategy”.

In this, O'Reilly agrees with her: slogans cannot be a strategy. But what is the Clinton strategy? How is she going to "stop the murder terrorists"? “IG”, like the black plague, marches across Europe, killing unpredictably, ”says the journalist. The victory over Islamic terrorism can be won, in his opinion, only by “brutal force”. Chatter about the fact that the Kurds cope with the "IG" is worth nothing. America needs a strong leader who will talk "with the smartest military people" and "make a clear plan of struggle," the leader is confident. Then, NATO also needs to "declare war on the IG". And "every Muslim country in the world" should be asked to use its troops and help NATO fight the "IG". And to hell with slogans.

O'Reilly, let us add, put Hillary Clinton in a bad light: he made the public understand that this lady doesn’t have any coherent strategy to fight IG.

Who is the real force capable of pinching a tail to terrorists?

The Russians.

It was them who thanked them through Twitter former ambassador to Moscow, Michael McFaul. Against the background of the message “Palmyra is liberated,” he wrote a short tweet in Russian: “Thank you!”

One commentator by the name of Eugene wrote in response: “And for what to say thanks to America? For destroyed Yugoslavia and Iraq? For drugs of Afghanistan? For bombed hospitals? ”

As recalled "Lenta.ru", 27 March, Syrian army soldiers and militia units released Palmyra: the army took under full control both the ancient part of the city and residential areas.

On the eve of March 26, it was reported that the Russian Air Force carried out 40 sorties in one day in support of the Syrian forces in the Palmyra region. 158 terrorist targets were attacked, more than 100 militants were destroyed, 4 tank, 3 gun mounts, 4 ammunition depots and 5 vehicles.

Russian victories over terrorists and Russian merits in the process of peacemaking were recognized not only by “former” ones. The role of Moscow was highly appreciated by the German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier.

An interview with him was published in a German newspaper. "Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung" (Waz).

According to Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who recently visited Moscow, the SPD assesses the Russian actions against the Islamic State as the most successful.

The Federal Minister believes that the terrible recent attacks (in Brussels, Paris, Istanbul, Tunisia and in many other places in the world) show: there is no absolute security anywhere. Terrorism "is directed against all people, indiscriminately, regardless of their origin, from their youth or old age, whether they are men or women, Christians, Jews or Muslims." Probably, Germany was “just lucky,” so far she had been spared from attacks.

“You were in Moscow last week. How do you assess the participation of Russia? ”Asked the interviewer.

According to the minister, Russia "still pursues its own, very different interests in Syria." At the same time, Russia "is not interested in constant chaos and the complete destruction of state structures in the Middle East." That is why the agreement reached in Vienna and Munich with Russia and the countries of the region on a road map for the cessation of hostilities and a political settlement, the minister considers “important”.

“The ceasefire agreement, humanitarian access, the beginning of peace talks in Geneva - all this would not have been possible without Russia's constructive participation,” said Steinmeier.

* * *


The Russian army has proved the effectiveness of force strikes against terrorists and contributed to the release of Palmyra, and US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is not in a position to propose any specific countermeasures to the radical militants. There are also scandalous accusations against the former Secretary of State: they say, Mrs. Clinton is the creator of IG.

At the same time, Russia is being thanked not only by former diplomats like McFaul, but also by current politicians like German Foreign Minister Herr Steinmeier.

True, this does not mean that Berlin, as well as Brussels, will stop dancing to the American tune. Alas, Europeans can praise Moscow and fly to Moscow, but they will act with an eye on Uncle Sam.
Author:
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. seti
    seti 28 March 2016 08: 36
    +19
    The problem is that in the eyes of America’s bosses, this will count towards her plus and not minus. This is the kind of person they need at the helm. And even though the president in the USA decides little, this is significant.
    1. cniza
      cniza 28 March 2016 08: 39
      +11
      The United States is now in a row, between Daesh and Assad, whom to support?
      1. Mikhail m
        Mikhail m 28 March 2016 08: 46
        +13
        "Assad must go" is not counted? They haven't given up on it.
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 28 March 2016 08: 59
          +19
          But what is Clinton’s strategy? How is she going to “stop the terrorists committing the killings”?

          But why is Clinton eager for the presidency of the United States? Maybe in order to take revenge on Bill in the same way? repeat Revenge of a woman is not predictable. yes
          1. Erg
            Erg 28 March 2016 09: 25
            +18
            To take revenge like that, you need to be in shape (and age). And Hillary, as well as her "baby sister" wassat Monica, it’s unlikely that anyone will be interested.
            1. iliitchitch
              iliitchitch 28 March 2016 09: 52
              +8
              Quote: Erg
              To take revenge like that, you need to be in shape (and age). And Hillary, as well as her "baby sister" Monica, is unlikely to be of interest to anyone.


              It will also interest you. Cigar - scandal - commission on impeachment - fame - book of memoirs - people millionaire. It’s nothing that is weird and had to wash with powder, the key word is "millionaire". That's how they are, Americans.
            2. ML-334
              ML-334 28 March 2016 09: 52
              +8
              Misanul seems to be Bill Clinton himself, for only he can give these persons an assessment.
              1. 79807420129
                79807420129 28 March 2016 10: 34
                +23
                Quote: ML-334
                Misanul seems to be Bill Clinton himself, for only he can give these persons an assessment.

                Bill Clinton himself preparing to become the first lady of the United States. fellow
          2. andj61
            andj61 28 March 2016 12: 06
            +7
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            But why is Clinton eager for the presidency of the United States? Maybe in order to take revenge on Bill in the same way?

            If Monica had been Bill's only ... fellow
            There were a lot of them, but only Lewinsky managed to raise a scandal in the media. In other cases, it was Hillary who dealt with Bill's passions very tough - and she did it. yes A kind of boy-woman ...
            And to be the main thing is an old dream for her! lol
        2. neo.
          neo. 28 March 2016 11: 25
          +8
          Quote: Michael m
          "Assad must go" is not counted? They haven't given up on it.

          They will now disrupt the elections, and after the elections will declare them rigged. And again, a revolution. What they need.
          Not whining, so skating, as they say. laughing
          1. Mikhail m
            Mikhail m 28 March 2016 14: 39
            +3
            It is said not by washing, so by skating. wink
      2. Altona
        Altona 28 March 2016 09: 14
        +6
        Assad's support is not part of their plans. Their main theses are: 1) Assad must leave; 2) Defeat IS without Assad, or rather Assad first. And they really have such a "raskoryachka". But it is unsolvable. Because they themselves created IS.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Jan Krumins
      Jan Krumins 28 March 2016 09: 37
      +5
      State Department Fury ...
    5. Samen
      Samen 28 March 2016 09: 40
      +9
      Hillary Clinton is not in a position to offer a single specific countermeasure to radical militants.
    6. Blondy
      Blondy 28 March 2016 10: 28
      +10
      The materials of the hacked home server H. Clinton explicitly indicate the motives of the reason for the organization of the confrontation with Assad, though without specifying Assad’s refusal to conduct the Trans-Syrian pipeline. I quote again:
      Blondy RU Yesterday, 17:43 | Independent: Bridlaw called on the Pentagon to transfer U-2 planes to Europe
      Well, and more about blondes
      The Obama administration has helped fuel a civil war in Syria, under the guise of "helping Israel." It is reported by Wikileaks, publishing a letter to Hillary Clinton.

      According to the source, the case F-2014-20439 under the number C05794498 is part of the mass publication on Wikileaks of all messages from the private server of Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

      “The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capabilities is to provide assistance to the people of Syria to overthrow the current regime of Bashar al-Assad,” - this is exactly how one of Clinton’s letters begins. At that time, she acknowledged that negotiations with Iran would not prevent the Islamic Republic from enriching uranium, a key component for creating nuclear weapons.

      “Negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear program will not solve Israel’s security dilemma. Moreover, this will not prevent Iran from creating nuclear weapons and enriching uranium. At best, the negotiation process between the major world powers and Iran will only delay Israel’s decision on war. And this will only provoke a major conflict in the Middle East, ”Hillary Clinton said in a letter.

      The League of Arab States did not call for military intervention from outside, as it was in Libya. It was easier there, because the US goal was to save civilians from the regime of Muammar Gaddafi, and the military campaign itself did not have such enormous significance for the Middle East. Syria is another matter. But if we succeed in the Syrian Arab Republic, it will literally transform the whole region. Firstly, another ruthless dictator will be massively condemned by the people and the opposition in the streets. And secondly, the entire region of the Middle East will be changed for the better, because Iran will no longer have a foothold with which it threatens Israel and undermines stability in the region, ”Clinton writes.

      And for those who want to read the link to the end:
      http://warfiles.ru/show-112919-klinton-svergnut-asada-i-unichtozhit-siriyu-dlya-


      izrailya.html
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 28 March 2016 21: 13
        +2
        A little to the topic "33": TV channel "24DOK": I did not think that he was from the series "rain":
  2. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 28 March 2016 08: 38
    +6
    The fact that the collective United States gave rise to Daesh / ISIS (as well as many other al-Qaeda terrorist organizations and so on) is not news at all ... and who made the greatest contribution there ... well, they know better ... it’s clear that Hillary Clinton I didn’t stand aside ... also had a hand ...
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 28 March 2016 12: 50
      +4
      The fact that the collective United States gave rise to Daesh / ISIS (as well as many other al-Qaeda terrorist organizations, etc.) ,,
      not only spawned, but also continues to support. It has already been discussed more than once — any organization needs finances. I think no one will argue that Americans cannot control the flow of money that goes to ensure the barmaley. So they just turn a blind eye to funding this education.
      1. olimpiada15
        olimpiada15 28 March 2016 18: 23
        +2
        Quote: kotvov
        The fact that the collective United States gave rise to Daesh / ISIS (as well as many other al-Qaeda terrorist organizations, etc.) ,,
        not only spawned, but also continues to support. It has already been discussed more than once — any organization needs finances. I think no one will argue that Americans cannot control the flow of money that goes to ensure the barmaley. So they just turn a blind eye to funding this education.

        More precisely, the United States is financing, not closing its eyes. IG is a part of their real policy, and not declared.
  3. Igor39
    Igor39 28 March 2016 08: 39
    0
    So Russia and Putin are sort of under sanctions economic and political in isolation?
  4. sa-ag
    sa-ag 28 March 2016 08: 39
    0
    Lady Hawk, then what side to the creation of ISIS? Under Bush, it all started and was pushed by the oil and gas lobby in the person of Dick Cheney.
  5. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 28 March 2016 08: 42
    +5
    The knife was stuck in the Clinton campaign.
  6. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 28 March 2016 08: 44
    +8
    Undoubtedly, the US actions to overthrow the legitimate rulers of the Middle East countries have become the cause of the current situation in this region of the planet.
    But the United States is trying to use any course of events for its political purposes, i.e. come out dry from water.
    Everyone understands this and is already used to it.
    After the election of the next president of the United States, the latter will continue to fulfill the will of the world government, acting in the interests of Israel.
    Not everyone understands the latter so far ...
    1. skeptic
      skeptic 28 March 2016 10: 03
      +3
      MP will continue to shake the world everywhere,
      in the last battle for world domination.
      Along the way, the ballast population will be destroyed.
      And the puppets who are called the "US President"
      long ago, they do not determine and decide nothing.
      Each of them knows his place and remembers
      the sad fate of the banally knocked out Kennedy clan.
      If only they did not finally buy up the viziers of the "darkest" ...
      Then - Khan.
    2. Al1977
      Al1977 28 March 2016 16: 48
      -1
      Quote: Pvi1206
      After the election of the next president of the United States, the latter will continue to fulfill the will of the world government, acting in the interests of Israel.
      Not everyone understands the latter so far ...

      How exactly did you notice ... but it explains a lot in the world and puts it in its place ... Thank you for the competent explanation of what is happening .. !!!
  7. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 28 March 2016 08: 45
    +1
    Well, Clinton, well, she created, put her hand to ISIS, but it didn’t work ... What should I kill her for? She must be given a chance and elected to be the US condom, she will create something else, just as successful.
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 28 March 2016 08: 45
    +5
    Alas, Europeans can praise Moscow and fly to Moscow, but they will act with an eye on Uncle Sam.

    Alas, this is so. Although reasonable voices are heard in the West, they will not affect Washington and Brussels' policies in any way. Just as the accusation of H. Clinton for the appearance of the “Islamic State” will not affect its election campaign.
  9. Monos
    Monos 28 March 2016 08: 48
    +21
    Grandmothers should be kind, not like Clinton.
  10. Good_Taxist
    Good_Taxist 28 March 2016 08: 49
    +6
    Quote: seti
    The problem is that in the eyes of America’s bosses, this will count towards her plus and not minus. This is the kind of person they need at the helm. And even though the president in the USA decides little, this is significant.

    .... but this hell in a skirt will authorize the war and is capable of insane and unpredictable acts
    1. Platonich
      Platonich 28 March 2016 09: 33
      +6
      Stsuka, she is stsuka !!!
  11. Ayujak
    Ayujak 28 March 2016 08: 52
    +12
    I remember how this "lady" rejoiced on the air when she was informed about the death of Gaddafi. It already takes a shiver. The man was torn to pieces alive. Horror.
    Everyone knows what Libya was before the invasion of the adversaries. Free medicine and education, active construction of cities, expansion of cooperation in various industries with foreign countries, including adversaries, etc.
    Is there no problem in the USA? The fact that I, an ordinary tourist, can be shot in broad daylight due to the fact that some cop confused .... horror.
    1. olimpiada15
      olimpiada15 28 March 2016 18: 36
      +3
      Quote: AYUJAK
      I remember how this "lady" rejoiced on the air when she was informed about the death of Gaddafi. It already takes a shiver. The man was torn to pieces alive. Horror.
      Everyone knows what Libya was before the invasion of the adversaries. Free medicine and education, active construction of cities, expansion of cooperation in various industries with foreign countries, including adversaries, etc.

      The fact of the matter is that the West cannot allow the normal life of the people in any country of the world, immediately begins "democratization", the destruction of the "tyrant", and in general state power is replaced by the power of the crowd and bandits. The highest justice in the opinion of American politicians is their personal power over all the peoples of the world, nothing worries them more than the power that ensures the normal existence of the people. They rejoice only when they kill. Limitless.
  12. qwert111
    qwert111 28 March 2016 09: 01
    +12
    Bill Clinton played the saxophone and practiced with Monica in the oval office. I wonder whose saxophone this Madame will play if she gets to the oval office? Maybe on McCain’s saxophone, she admitted in the American press that she drank vodka with him. Why not do it with a drunk! belay
  13. afrikanez
    afrikanez 28 March 2016 09: 03
    +6
    It is a pity that the Inquisition is not practiced in the West now, to burn this beast and business ... It’s even hard to imagine what this lady would do, becoming the president of the United States!
    1. Pinkie F.
      Pinkie F. 28 March 2016 09: 38
      0
      Quote: afrikanez
      It is a pity that the inquisition is not practiced in the West now, to burn this beast and business ...

      Yeah, if the bearded ones practice medieval methods - are we worse?
      Pralna - let the Clintons go to the "Hammer of the Witches"! laughing
    2. aleksey980
      aleksey980 29 March 2016 04: 04
      +1
      Quote: afrikanez
      It’s even hard to imagine what this lady will do, becoming the president of the United States!

      What they command her will do it.
  14. Gray 43
    Gray 43 28 March 2016 09: 05
    +3
    In one of the Internet blogs, an interesting article came up with how the terrorist units ward by the Pentagon are fighting among themselves, against similar wards of the CIA, is this such a strategy game? The staff, the stump is clear, there are no losses, and so, on the campaign, they have everywhere, including politics
  15. shinobi
    shinobi 28 March 2016 09: 09
    +4
    For the United States, this works the other way around. The better in Russia and the more attractive the world is, the worse. We are waiting for (c) another portion of sanctions.
  16. ruAlex
    ruAlex 28 March 2016 09: 10
    +8
    Correctly yesterday, Solovyov expressed himself in the program “even during the VO. There were very difficult relations between the USSR and the West, but no one introduced any sanctions!” Now there is such a message, you Russians, rake up all the disgrace that we have produced, and we we will spread rot with sanctions and other double standards!
  17. Taygerus
    Taygerus 28 March 2016 09: 30
    +6
    even if the states would deal with their internal problems, the police would shoot them black and white without investigation, and there would be enough other problems, and their gendarme policy pursued by them around the world would bring only ruin, poverty and, as a result, a civil war in previously relatively prosperous regions which, in essence, makes them the main terrorists on the planet, and from a talking head in the role of president whoever they choose to have a foreign policy they will not change much hi
    1. Erg
      Erg 28 March 2016 09: 45
      +4
      I agree - the US presidential election is a fiction. But you cannot take away the "toy" from the people. Well, how can you deprive a child of childhood ... hi
  18. parusnik
    parusnik 28 March 2016 09: 53
    +8
    Alas, Europeans can praise Moscow and fly to Moscow, but they will act with an eye on Uncle Sam...Riding on two horses, the seats aren’t enough ..
  19. Konstantin Yu
    Konstantin Yu 28 March 2016 10: 09
    +2
    Quote: Erg
    I agree - the US presidential election is a fiction. But you cannot take away the "toy" from the people. Well, how can you deprive a child of childhood ... hi


    This child began to play and already got everyone with his games and toys ...
  20. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 28 March 2016 10: 16
    +2
    IS founded in Iraq by the Sunnis in the so-called
    Sunni triangle as a reaction
    on the Shiite government that appeared in Iraq, which began to oppress them.
    Founded by former BAAS party officers Saddam Hussein
    (themselves NOT religious fanatics). Hence the major military successes of the IG.
    Later, Islamist imams got involved in the case, invented the Sunni "caliphate"
    in Iraq and neighboring countries.

    The Americans at that time were killing Al Qaeda, and the ISA CIA blinked.
    Giuliani got excited, of course, in pre-election enthusiasm.
    Clinton is a chaotic and emotional woman, but she would not "found IS"
    has come. She just doesn’t know much about the dynamic Middle Eastern boiler and
    often makes mistakes.
    1. Victor-M
      Victor-M 28 March 2016 10: 51
      +7
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Clinton is a chaotic and emotional woman, but she would not "found IS"
      has come.

      You too literally understood his words. The entire leadership of Clinton and Bush Jr. are guilty of creating IS, guilty of their intervention and the destruction of the countries of the Middle East.
    2. kotvov
      kotvov 28 March 2016 12: 58
      +2
      The Americans at the time were killing Al Qaeda, and the ISA CIA blinked. ,,
      well, how did you finish off the kaida? stop, the Americans did everything so that both IS and AL Qaeda would only increase. why did they (the Americans) allow the militants to be transferred to Libya, and the US allies would transfer Turks and Qatari.
    3. Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat 28 March 2016 16: 07
      +1
      And, well, yes, of course they "organized", but what kind of "shisha"? In fact, your post should begin like this: "The Israelis formed IS as a counterbalance to the Shiite" Hezbollah "and Iran ..., and further in the text. wink
  21. digo
    digo 28 March 2016 10: 56
    +2
    laughing In general, in Syria, Russia simply recalled:
    Whoever comes to us with a sword is waiting for that "surprise" ... soldier
    PS. ento so that the West thinks, and then, having forgotten history, with a fool, it will rush to Russia ...
    1. karolinaferera
      karolinaferera 28 March 2016 11: 19
      +5
      Yeah, especially before the winter, forgetting about General Frost, who drove the French, drove the Germans and who else snoops around also chases. laughing
  22. askort154
    askort154 28 March 2016 10: 56
    +2
    How the level of "presidential quality" in the USA is rapidly declining after Roosevelt. Already rolled down
    to the clowning. It started with the Reagan actor, Bill Clinton, Bush middle (tried even younger),
    Obama, now Trump and Hillary Clinton. None of them are attracted to a "serious" politician on a global scale. What positive can these populist clowns give the World ?! There is a clear degradation.
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 28 March 2016 11: 30
      +6
      And what about the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and other "moneybags" new Roosevelts ?!
      At one time, Kennedy had enough of them "I just can't" - the whole clan had to "go to no" lime!
      And this elderly "chain bitch" - like no one else fits the role of "world barking watchdog"!
      Moreover, the Jewish lobby at its gathering recently approved the "appointment" of the Clintonshey as their overseer!
      Still, the Jews do not trust the redheads, so Trump is not what to catch there!
  23. Alisamonster
    Alisamonster 28 March 2016 11: 10
    +4
    Well, the creator is not direct, of course. It is unlikely. But if it is confirmed that America supports IS, I won’t even be surprised. Too much has pointed this out lately.
    1. karolinaferera
      karolinaferera 28 March 2016 11: 15
      +4
      In fact, the United States has not created ISIS through its aggressive policies. First, they stabilized the Middle East, and then they wonder where the radicals came from.
  24. Vetal999
    Vetal999 28 March 2016 11: 28
    +2
    Clintonsha is a chatterbox, but controlled. What else do you need?
  25. Arkan
    Arkan 28 March 2016 11: 51
    +2
    Theater of the absurd. While it was profitable, the accusers were silent, and now they are presenting a farce called "Bastinda and the Flying Monkeys."
  26. atamankko
    atamankko 28 March 2016 12: 07
    +2
    A deceived old woman pissed off all over the world is torn for the presidency of the USA, why?
    1. faridg7
      faridg7 28 March 2016 12: 35
      +2
      Quote: atamankko
      A deceived old woman pissed off all over the world is torn for the presidency of the USA, why?

      And so far only the president of the United States can take revenge (shit) at once on the whole world. therefore, it breaks into the oval office
  27. ksv36
    ksv36 28 March 2016 12: 23
    +4
    After Bushev, they left only clowns. No choice.
  28. tacet
    tacet 28 March 2016 12: 39
    +2
    "... Europeans can praise Moscow ..." Do we need it? What do we get from someone else's praise, we're not like cats? Action is the only criterion.
  29. Lily
    Lily 28 March 2016 18: 10
    +3
    Clinton is strongly supported by the Neocons and Neotrotskis. They all hate Russia and dream of destroying it. They run errands for Russian liberals and bullshit from Chubais, Kudrin, Gref, Nabiullina to Kasyanov, Ponomarev, Khodarkovsky, Ryzhkov and other abominations.
  30. Calter
    Calter 28 March 2016 22: 32
    -1
    Then the speaker hit a potential presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Speaking about her, Mr. Giuliani noted that the former secretary of state “had a chance” to develop a strategy to combat IS, but instead of implementing a suitable plan, “she helped create an IS”.

    I apologize, but how can you develop a fight with something even before its creation? Translation is not precise?
  31. Stabilization
    Stabilization 28 March 2016 22: 48
    0
    Clitari ...
  32. Jozhkin Cat
    Jozhkin Cat 28 March 2016 23: 27
    +1
    constructive participation of Russia (c) There is nowhere more constructive)))
  33. South Ural
    South Ural 29 March 2016 08: 56
    +2
    So it tempts to ask: Is it really possible to say seriously that the United States, under any administration, has ever strived for peace? They unleashed 2 world wars, "earned" good capital on this. Now they are in debt for the third time and are trying to repeat what they have already done twice.
    In addition, in my opinion, after the remaining monarchies in the world, this is not the most democratic state in the world. Let them really give people the right to vote at least in elections, and then they’ll climb to learn. And even then, several centuries must pass. European countries and we have been going to this for centuries.
  34. satris
    satris 29 March 2016 11: 15
    0
    And through what, I wonder, did she give birth to him?
  35. romandostalo
    romandostalo 30 March 2016 00: 12
    0
    Scum infection !!! I remember there was a wonderful series about her in South Park ...