Military Review

Trump and global order

90
Donald Trump continues to shock the pastoral and tolerant public in the United States and around the world. On Sunday, March 27, he made quite a number of sensational statements. First of all, the presidential candidate announced that NATO is an outdated organization, the content of which costs the United States of America too expensive. Earlier, the politician made similar statements regarding Japan and South Korea: according to Trump, they pay too little for maintaining American troops on their territory. The Republican candidate even promised to withdraw American troops from these countries if they did not begin to spend more on their content, but at the same time not to interfere if Tokyo and Seoul would like to acquire their own nuclear weapons.




Returning to European affairs, Trump also mentioned that what is happening in Ukraine is not something critically important for the United States, but it is Washington that fights for this country much more actively than Western European countries.

In the Middle East, Donald Trump accused Saudi Arabia of abusing the economic and military assistance of Washington, without which this country would not last long, which, by the way, is completely untrue. Also, the presidential candidate promised that in the most radical form, with its possible presidency, America could stop buying oil from Riyadh. About Israel, while nothing significant was said, but given the general vector, news for him they will hardly be good. On the other hand, another idea was expressed that it was quite seditious for the modern US that it was impossible to fight ISIS and Assad at the same time. Considering that all these years America was instilled with a delusion that without a victory over Assad, a victory over ISIL is impossible (!), Then we have a real breakthrough in the information field.

In general, it can be said that Trump's main foreign policy line and those influential circles that stand behind him have completely formed. And this is an objective reality. By 2016, there was a very clear picture of possible prospects for the American elite: either saving the world dollar system at the price of collapsing the US economy or saving the American economy through a collapse of the dollar and the collapse of the world dollar system. The financial oligarchy is strictly for the first option, the American industrialists - for the second. International bankers are, to put it simply, Hillary Clinton, industrialists and the whole real sector in general - Donald Trump. These are two poles, the world between which there can be no way.

Trump's hypothetical but unlikely coming to power would mean a real revolution for the United States of America. Namely, the transfer of power from the financial world to industrialists. That is, bankers will be made dependent on the production elite, and not vice versa. Essentially, the order that arose in 1913 with the founding of the Fed was eliminated, continued under Roosevelt (starting with the confiscation of gold from the US population in 1933, ending with the Bretton Woods system) and finally enslaved the world under Reagan and Clinton. Nowadays, the power of speculators not only meets resistance in the world, but also threatens the economic stability of the United States. After all, fighting for super-profits and global control, bankers did not particularly care about the survival of production within the United States, with the result that the real sector gradually lost ground under the influx of first European and Japanese, and then Chinese goods.

The essence of the industrialists' policy, if they enter the White House, will consist not only of subordinating bankers to the needs of the real sector, but also economic, as well as foreign policy isolation of the country. Here we return to the beginning of this text and once again read Trump's quotes. They should be interpreted as follows: “America has got too many freeloaders, for the protection and maintenance of the economic stability of which we spend too many resources, protecting them and giving them a share of our domestic market. It’s time to stop this vicious practice. We close our market from outsiders, and now they protect themselves. We spend serious money on defense, even if they spend it. ” In other words, the States in their new guise will not only not give trade indulgences to the satellites, but will also force them to put money on a new arms race. This will be a new isolationism.

We, Russian, Trump, of course, is not at all a friend. He is a strong personality, combining intelligence and determination, and such people are a very difficult contingent for any kind of interaction. It is enough to remember what the alliance with similar independent figures turned out for Russia historically: Recep Erdogan, Mao Zedong, Adolf Hitler ... So you shouldn’t excessively admire Trump. He is not a lone hero, a fighter against the system, but simply a representative of another circle of the elite. Yes, the ostentatious radicalism of the scandalous candidate is only a visible shell, which is necessary for future fundamental changes. But in stories There are examples when ideology ultimately prevailed over pragmatism. It is not yet clear whether it will be possible for the Americans to avoid this trap.

Nevertheless, the possible arrival of a moderate isolationist in the White House opens up some opportunities for us. Whether domestic diplomacy, whose activities, starting from 1985 year to the present, on 90% consists of incompetence, failures and betrayal, will be able to take advantage of these opportunities, the question is quite another.
Author:
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bureaucrat
    Bureaucrat 29 March 2016 06: 07
    +27
    domestic diplomacy, whose activities, starting from the 1985 of the year and to the present, at 90% consist of incompetence, failures and betrayal

    From 1985 to 2010, one could say and need to say so, but starting from 2012. Bolotnaya opened a new milestone in our diplomacy, so here we must refrain from such accusations. And it is not clear Crimea is a failure or betrayal?
    1. cniza
      cniza 29 March 2016 08: 00
      +11
      Yes, they will not allow him to the presidential cabinet, there will be anyone but him, God forbid that I make a mistake.
      1. Misha Honest
        Misha Honest 29 March 2016 10: 53
        +6
        Quote: cniza
        Yes, they will not allow him to the presidential cabinet, there will be anyone but him, God forbid that I make a mistake.

        Yeah, Kennedy’s example clearly proves that the thinking realist president in the USA is clearly not needed by their elites. Such people do not live long ...
      2. Cananecat
        Cananecat 29 March 2016 11: 21
        0
        It may very well be that they will allow that the states will change the vector of foreign and domestic policy in the circumstances, this is understandable. And who should do this if not a new president? On this a terrible aunt will hold, and will ensure the victory of Trump.
      3. Huan karlos
        Huan karlos 29 March 2016 16: 32
        -1
        yeah, leaders are not quoted there with brains.
        And so Trump norms a man, the only one, read his books, albeit financial, well done
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. dogens
        dogens 30 March 2016 13: 00
        0
        Quote: cniza
        Yes, they will not allow him to the presidential cabinet, there will be anyone but him, God forbid that I make a mistake.


        This "anyone" Hillary Clinton.
        1). First, such radical statements more often scare people than convert them to faith.
        2). Secondly, in the article, I do not know how precisely the parties to the confrontation between "industrial bankers" are defined, but these forces clearly exist, and whoever is behind Trump, neither one needs radicals in power.
        3). In addition to "radicals are not needed in power" and "people will be afraid", any American is now living pretty well. Even those who live poorly are unlikely to want fundamental changes. Do not forget that in the USA, self-identity is developed no worse than in our country, or among the Jews (did you offend anyone with a word?). They are also preoccupied with the idea of ​​patriotism and pride in the country in the vastness of foreign policy. Will they refuse to slow down? I think no. Does the average American understand what Trump's reforms will bring him? no. Scary? Yes.
        4). When distributing camps to industrialists and bankers, the defense industry should be attributed to the industrial sector, however, this is one of the main impetus in foreign policy, and now if they don’t rule the ball, they order music for sure. Under the Trump statements, the defense industry will suffer greatly .... If not to say that it will be squeezed into a bagel. That is, these bigwigs and lobbyists are unlikely now in Trump's camp. So not all industrialists are behind Trump.
        Thanks to the author for the analysis, but there are questions for discussion.
        And yes, it is often said that trump Russophile is close to our leaders .... however, given that our leaders are sometimes farther from us than Kim Jong-un, you should not really be happy. He may change his mind in real affairs, and not use his Russophilia (if it really is, is not an image) for the benefit of US-RF relations.
        1. alexqazw
          alexqazw 30 March 2016 16: 45
          0
          Russophile is not Russophile, but Trump is good for us already in that he is not Hillary Clinton.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Sweles
      Sweles 29 March 2016 08: 15
      +10
      A hypothetical but unlikely rise to power of Trump will mean a real revolution for the United States of America. Namely, the transfer of power from the bigwigs of the financial world to industrialists. That is, bankers will be made dependent on the production elite, and not vice versa


      how stupid Kabardin industry has long been ruled by bankers, as well as by everything else, so a tramp cannot be president — not a Jew, so he can talk about anything.
      I remember the election of Yeltsin 96g
      - in the first place zyuganov
      Zyuganov and Yeltsin are already flush
      Yeltsin is pushing forward
      that's all "democracy" and America will be the same, there will be a fool Clintonich ...
      1. ruAlex
        ruAlex 29 March 2016 14: 57
        +6
        Yeah, and Vanga won said that they have the last black, so we will see for a while guessing. Although I notice Trump as a ray of light in the darkness of obscurantism.
      2. SlavaP
        SlavaP 29 March 2016 21: 55
        0
        This is how American "democracy" works. So in the last years of Roosevelt's reign, Henry Wallace was quietly removed there (clever, humanist but also a realist - I strongly advise you: read about this man) and pulled out absolutely zero Truman. Then Kennedy was removed in favor of the full Johnson and Nixon. Then they dragged Bush's worthlessness for a second term. Then, somehow, Obama was given a second term. Now guaranteed to put on the throne of Clintons. Why am I so sure, please. Take any large corporation: at the very top are the "gray cardinals" ruling the ball. But at the second level from them there is an incredible amount of corporate fools with an animal grin and intelligence, as well as the vocabulary of Ellochka the cannibal.
        But even lower you have to keep a certain number of "effective managers" - someone still needs to work ...
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. siberalt
      siberalt 29 March 2016 10: 35
      +3
      Is it time for Poroshenko to issue a decree on the appointment of Obama for a second term? Not that Americans will completely forget about them laughing This is much more real than arresting satellites in space.
    6. Megatron
      Megatron 29 March 2016 11: 50
      +3
      And it is not clear Crimea is a failure or betrayal?

      Probably both. Because it was necessary to take away at least the Donbass, and in theory - the entire corridor to Transnistria. Then these expensive bridges and electric cables were not needed, there would be no problems with water, humcolumns. And most importantly, wars. So many people would not die!
      1. Alexy
        Alexy 29 March 2016 17: 15
        -3
        How simple it is for you. Pick up and pick up.
      2. serohim
        serohim 29 March 2016 18: 11
        -1
        If only there was enough political and economic will. Already taken away. Question is always in price?
    7. Mihail29
      Mihail29 29 March 2016 13: 23
      +2
      You understand the difference between 90% and 100%.
    8. Alex777
      Alex777 29 March 2016 18: 10
      0
      Crimea is 10%. ))))
  2. sdc_alex
    sdc_alex 29 March 2016 06: 17
    +13
    Trump's rise to power will mean a real revolution for the United States of America. Namely, the transfer of power from the bigwigs of the financial world to industrialists. That is, bankers will be made dependent on the production elite


    Why do you think so? Rather, even if he wins the election and becomes president, his rhetoric and his policies will change somewhat. The President in the United States does not single-handedly determine the policies of the state. I believe that he will not be allowed to change the vector of foreign policy by so much.
    1. krops777
      krops777 29 March 2016 06: 32
      +7
      Rather, even if he wins the election and becomes president, his rhetoric and his policies will change somewhat. The President in the United States does not single-handedly determine the policies of the state. I believe that he will not be allowed to change the vector of foreign policy by so much.


      That's right, and it doesn't matter who the talking head is.
    2. Amurets
      Amurets 29 March 2016 06: 44
      +5
      Quote: sdc_alex
      I believe that he will not be allowed to change the vector of foreign policy by so much.

      I don’t know how much the United States will change the policy vector, but the vector of the economy is already leaning toward China. The US Congress has taken care that the largest US companies are bought up by China. Http://politikus.ru/v-rossii/73055-kitay-pokupaet-ssha.html
      And this is news as Ulyukaev and the government gathered the Russian Federation to sell to the Americans.
      http://ria.ru/economy/20160328/1398702736.html
    3. sa-ag
      sa-ag 29 March 2016 09: 27
      0
      Quote: sdc_alex
      Why do you think so? Rather, even if he wins the election and becomes president, his rhetoric and his policies will change somewhat. The President in the United States does not single-handedly determine the policies of the state. I believe that he will not be allowed to change the vector of foreign policy by so much.

      Well, why not, the industrial lobby in the face of falling energy prices receive an additional incentive to development, so their position may be stronger
    4. CONTROL
      CONTROL 29 March 2016 09: 34
      0
      Quote: sdc_alex
      The President in the United States does not single-handedly determine the policies of the state. I believe that he will not be allowed to change the vector of foreign policy by so much.

      And in general, not a single head of any state determines or pursues policy alone! As Athos said, it seems in The Three Musketeers: - “Yes, the king is the first of the nobles!
      There were always enough methods to persuade the king to pursue a "noble" policy - from peasant uprisings and the parliamentary lobby to a simple stranglehold ... or a guards scarf and snuffbox ... in Russian ...
      1. Ivanov-AO
        Ivanov-AO 29 March 2016 11: 23
        -1
        Well, snuffbox, let’s say, more London politics ...
        And the guards are the old covenant version of the offshore elite.
  3. Pencil
    Pencil 29 March 2016 06: 30
    +7
    A hypothetical but unlikely rise to power of Trump will mean ... a transfer of power from the bigwigs of the financial world to industrialists. That is, bankers will be made dependent on the production elite, and not vice versa.
    And I like it))!
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 29 March 2016 19: 24
      0
      Pencil

      There is a third option. Which bankers and industrialists will satisfy. And va including.

      This option is a system of guaranteed income to the population. Technically, it’s not difficult to do.


      This option has already been discussed in the press. They want to allegedly run. But it’s clear that money will snatch, and the work will be done through a rectal opening. And then they say that the idea does not work.

      I.V. Stalin at one time turned this little idea, but there were its own peculiarities.

      In 1978, in Canada, it was also done locally. I liked it. Ontario will now launch a drive project. I don’t believe that it’s coming, but we'll see.
  4. parusnik
    parusnik 29 March 2016 06: 34
    +4
    Trump or someone else .. From the rearrangement of the terms, the amount does not change ..
    1. Aleksander
      Aleksander 29 March 2016 08: 03
      +3
      Quote: parusnik
      Trump or someone else .. From the rearrangement of the terms, the amount does not change ..


      That is yes. Sometimes I want to find something attractive in each of them, but in the end, you know, ALL of them are crazy there ....
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 29 March 2016 10: 25
        -1
        Compared to chicken Clinton, Trump is very adequate.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 March 2016 06: 43
    +6
    in relation to Japan and South Korea: according to Trump, they pay too little for the maintenance of American troops on their territory.

    The Americans are perfectly attached to the globe. They still pay for the occupation of foreign territories.
    There is only one thing that can be said about Trump - do not confuse election speeches with the real politics of the elected president.
  6. Alex_59
    Alex_59 29 March 2016 06: 49
    +8
    The author is too optimistic. As the power did not change in the USA, I never remember that the general vector changed much. In fact, the choice between shades of the same color, i.e. elections with no real choice.
    In general, the United States is in fact not a bad country, and the people are normal, I would like everything to be normal, but at the same time to finally give the rest of the world to live humanly and without imposing will on the part of their rulers.
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL 29 March 2016 09: 36
      0
      Quote: Alex_59
      As the power did not change in the USA, I never remember that the general vector changed much. In fact, the choice between shades of the same color, i.e. elections without a real choice.

      The choice between shades of black ...
  7. Absurdidat
    Absurdidat 29 March 2016 06: 52
    +1
    Well, this is Khazin’s analysis, and in general of this whole brigade. If trump is beaten, we will finally be thrown off Chubais and Co.
  8. Igor39
    Igor39 29 March 2016 06: 59
    +1
    What? They say the dollar kapets? Campaign need to buy dollars. laughing
  9. pimen
    pimen 29 March 2016 07: 05
    -1
    if Trump could remove the bankers from power, he would take one of the first places in the pantheon of America, and, in fact, heal this monster. But is it necessary?
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 29 March 2016 20: 39
      0
      pimen

      No need to touch the bankers. As they say do not touch ..., will not stink.

      They already raped themselves. .5% on loans is not bad. The right way went comrades.

      But the frames really decide everything. Here the classic practitioner, with practical advice and a personal example, helped.

      It is necessary to translate capitalism from quantity to quality. I.V. already told how to do this, showed an example. It worked, so God forbid. If Khrushchev hadn’t pressed the handbrake, then the class cars would already fly into space.

      But the problem is that they don’t know how to do it. I.V. the principle did not open and the implementation mechanism is technically a little different.
      1. pimen
        pimen 29 March 2016 20: 53
        -1
        somehow you veiled everything.
        Bankers should not be No. 1 in any situation - this is a matter of principle.
        Healing capitalism is another problem. The theory of "stunning" consumption is generally impossible to interrupt
        1. gladcu2
          gladcu2 29 March 2016 21: 02
          -1
          pimen

          No need to beat the enemies. Enemies must be made allies and give them an alternative.

          But there is an alternative. And just fucking. Such that bankers have forgotten how to breathe from happiness.
          1. pimen
            pimen 29 March 2016 21: 11
            0
            - crap ?! And what does it look like in practice?
        2. gladcu2
          gladcu2 29 March 2016 21: 16
          0
          pimen

          I’ll leave the intrigue, even though I have already said a lot.

          Awareness must go through the process of understanding through difficulties. You need to earn it. By type, until the fried rooster pecks, the man will not roll over.

          I wrote somewhere down there. A little more brought to understanding. And technically, there is also an idea of ​​implementation. I know that, and you strain.
          1. pimen
            pimen 29 March 2016 21: 30
            0
            I do not cut a fig. Hitler tried to consolidate society better than others. But the "quilted jackets" still beat him
            1. gladcu2
              gladcu2 29 March 2016 21: 59
              0
              pimen

              No ideologies. Technically simple solution. True, then the time will come, relatively speaking, of class consciousness. But this is not an ideology. There are moral forms of everyday life.

              Hitler is one of his own, but now the conversation is not about Stalin and Hitler and who won.

              Here, their problems are relevant.
              1. pimen
                pimen 29 March 2016 22: 15
                +1
                I, of course, not "seven inches in the forehead" but something tells me that a person who stubbornly (and unreasonably) does not want to clarify his position on a specific issue, most likely, does not have it
                1. gladcu2
                  gladcu2 30 March 2016 15: 50
                  0
                  pimen

                  See below in the comments. I gave you a chance to think. I already drew your attention.
  10. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 March 2016 07: 23
    +3
    It will not happen. Trump, having gotten (if) in the presidency, will inevitably fall into the grip of real governance, and there Congress, and there the Senate, and not the president takes laws ... Therefore, the witch Clintonsha will not unleash a nuclear war - with all its inadequacy. But Trump will not be allowed to steer the economy and turn the steering wheel, taking power away from financial capital, if he were three times president. Let him remember the fate of Kennedy.
    1. pimen
      pimen 29 March 2016 07: 48
      +1
      There is such an iron formula: "cadres decide everything." Of course, the removal of bankers from power is not a task for one presidential term, but there are opportunities - there would be will, basic skills to dodge blows and a little luck (Trump meets this minimum set of criteria)
      1. CONTROL
        CONTROL 29 March 2016 09: 40
        0
        Quote: pimen
        There is such an iron formula: "cadres decide everything." Of course, removing bankers from power is not a task for one presidential term, but there are opportunities - there would be a will,

        This is the first time in many years before the first Negro President came to power in the United States - with him, with Obama! - There was a real threat of a resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan! They started shooting blacks in the streets ... even a punks ...
  11. Ros 56
    Ros 56 29 March 2016 07: 25
    +2
    Yes, actually it's nothing new, the usual election mess of truth with fiction, because you need to attract people of different views to your side, and that’s where the candidates are so excited. Those who adhered to a certain line of behavior, they have already left the race.
    1. Lyton
      Lyton 29 March 2016 07: 37
      +1
      Indeed, to promise does not mean to marry, it is not known how Trump will behave and whether he will be allowed to behave this way if he becomes president of Merikosia.
  12. free
    free 29 March 2016 07: 32
    +3
    Will domestic diplomacy be able to take advantage of these opportunities, the activities of which, from 1985 to the present, 90% percent consists of incompetence, failures and betrayal, the question is completely different.

    but this is a lie, obvious and stupid!
    1. Stanislas
      Stanislas 29 March 2016 07: 59
      -2
      Quote: free
      this is a lie, obvious and stupid
      Kabardin puts Shevardnadze, Knyazev and Lavrov on the same level, or, more precisely, mixes them together, or, more precisely, mixes Lavrov with crap, covering it up with "percentages." The quoted judgment represents "66,6%" of info-feces poured into the brains of the gullible reader. Does the word "stupid" in your comment sound like an excuse for the author or an accusation from the editor?
    2. Svidetel 45
      Svidetel 45 29 March 2016 13: 00
      +2
      If we take into account the results of economic policy in relation to supporting pro-Russian forces both in Donbass and Lugansk, and throughout Ukraine, the author in his statement about incompetence, and perhaps even betrayal, is not far from the truth.
  13. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 29 March 2016 07: 38
    0
    Shocking, the theater of one actor --- it is on the surface. And the present, important ---- in secret and silence.
  14. sardine
    sardine 29 March 2016 07: 41
    +1
    The last amerovsky prezik who tried to "overthrow" the bankers from the throne was Kenedy, for which he paid with his life. All presidents after him are nothing more than showmen.
  15. Hooks
    Hooks 29 March 2016 07: 53
    0
    Yes, the GOP neocons are shocked by this comrade. Most likely, they themselves will try to "strangle" not very much their candidate, having previously bargained with the democrats for themselves a plus.
  16. VP
    VP 29 March 2016 08: 12
    0
    The president in the United States doesn’t decide that much.
    He must make any at least some meaningful decision through the Senate and Congress.
  17. Dam
    Dam 29 March 2016 08: 27
    0
    Let Trump and Clintonsha cling to each other to death, and this will end in the Civil War. Let America no longer have a president., Only field commanders.
    1. AlNikolaich
      AlNikolaich 29 March 2016 09: 16
      0
      Quote: Damm
      Let Trump and Clintonsha cling to each other to death, and this will end in the Civil War. Let America no longer have a president., Only field commanders.

      Yes?!?! And then what to do with this gabon with rockets? The collapse of America, this is not the collapse of the USSR in the 1991 year! God forbid!
    2. gladcu2
      gladcu2 29 March 2016 20: 46
      0
      Dam

      It will end with household injuries and ship dismantling.

      For such trifles, they do not invest in wars.
  18. Altona
    Altona 29 March 2016 08: 35
    +5
    Our friend Donald Trump is basically doing a big job regardless of the outcome of future presidential elections. He pursues a right-wing ideology, which has not been observed in the world for a long time, since the ultra-left and neoconservatives have long been closely intertwined in our world, filling society with their almost deadly cocktail. For the ideas of "general humanism" perfectly correlate with the idea of ​​super-profit. That is, if you want super-profits, declare a more or less developed and unrooted country "a country without democracy and human rights." And everything will be bad, the "humanists" will take up the automatic machines, the global business will immediately drive the collection trucks. Donald proposes to make an audit of what the US needs and what is not necessary in order to reasonably manage the capabilities of the US STATE. But the US state already exists only on paper, so little shines for old Donald. But as an orator he is great.
    1. VP
      VP 29 March 2016 09: 45
      +1
      Only on paper, say, exists?
      Does anyone else know about this?
      1. Altona
        Altona 29 March 2016 10: 11
        0
        Quote: VP
        Only on paper, say, exists?
        Does anyone else know about this?

        -----------------
        Of course he does. Transnational corporations on behalf of the United States pursue their interests, while the United States as a state has long accumulated a tangle of problems.
        1. VP
          VP 29 March 2016 11: 18
          0
          Those. Do problems make the state non-state?
          And which states then remained in the world?
          Well, except for Ukraine)
          1. Altona
            Altona 29 March 2016 11: 36
            +3
            Quote: VP
            Those. Do problems make the state non-state?
            And which states then remained in the world?
            Well, except for Ukraine)

            -------------------------------
            And which ones? Yes, no already. Everything is only divided into more or less. And even economic ratings are assigned. And what? Does Russia have many attributes of the state? Education and medicine, we already have services, not social functions. Work is also a service. Yes, there is so far the army and navy, industry is still there, if you do not compare it with the Soviet, many times more. Even our ruble and that quasidollar. And so whatever state you take. At least the United States, at least Swaziland.
            1. VP
              VP 29 March 2016 11: 57
              0
              And what shall we do?
              1. Altona
                Altona 29 March 2016 18: 58
                0
                Quote: VP
                And what shall we do?

                ----------------------------------
                Rather, "who will then pay for this world mess?" laughing Yes, FIG knows him, Comrade Major. Until we bring the new left idea and embrace the masses with it, we will drown in this imperialist fecal brew.
              2. gladcu2
                gladcu2 29 March 2016 20: 57
                0
                VP

                What to do?

                Studying, studying and studying. As bequeathed, you yourself know who.

                But he was right.

                The transition of quantity into quality, this is precisely the transition from the material sphere of competition of capitalism to the intellectual, from the sphere of education and science.

                I.V. Stalin did it. He reformatted capitalism.

                Formally, according to the definitions of the classics of Marx. In the USSR, there was capitalism in the form of muonopolistic ownership of the state over all means of production.

                But they called him not unfoundedly socialism. And from here the capitalists began to sausage. They began to break the concepts.

                I.V. Stalin, withdrew from the area of ​​the capitalist form of competition the wages of the population. Not income, but wages. Please do not confuse.

                He reduced the working day and launched the processes of education and science.
                1. gladcu2
                  gladcu2 29 March 2016 21: 24
                  0
                  When science works and there are ready-made specialists, work appears for investors and industrialists.

                  All that needs to be done without touching the form of ownership is to remove the salaries of citizens from the sphere of material competition.

                  Technically easy.
  19. Kenneth
    Kenneth 29 March 2016 08: 46
    +2
    By the way, Russia also has too many parasites. With much less resources.
  20. Friends
    Friends 29 March 2016 08: 53
    +1
    Author

    Quote: sdc_alex
    Rather, even if he wins the election and becomes president, his rhetoric and his policies will change somewhat. The President in the United States does not single-handedly determine the policies of the state. I believe that he will not be allowed to change the vector of foreign policy by so much.


    Quote: krops777
    That's right, and it doesn't matter who the talking head is.


    100%

    2 people were seriously trying to change something in the USA ... Franklin Roosevelt, in part, managed to achieve what he wanted - by the most brutal methods and at the cost of his own life, he was most likely poisoned (there is such a version).

    The second is John F. Kennedy ... who, according to one version, planned to nationalize the printing press by taking it from the Fed. What was allegedly said before a trip to Dallas ...

    Quote: sardare
    promise doesn't mean getting married


    That's for sure. Recall the election tales told by Old Man Husseinich ... Then, too, many shouted that a revolution was coming in US foreign and domestic policy. The result is known ...


    As for me, the presidency of Barabama, as well as the possible arrival of Trump, is a clear indicator of how little, today, means the personality of the president in the United States.
  21. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 29 March 2016 09: 06
    +1
    The author of the article likes bankers more than industrialists.
    And this is understandable: they are now paying and ordering music.
    Only this fall, the world expects big shocks regardless of who wins the US election.
    The crisis has long ripened, we just need a reason to break through it ...
  22. Turkir
    Turkir 29 March 2016 09: 13
    +2
    the arrival of a moderate isolationist in the White House opens up some opportunities for us

    Everything is relative.
    The article does not mention the position on the same issues, Hillary Clinton, and this reduces its value.
    In my opinion, Trump's victory would reduce tensions between the Russian Federation and the United States, and this is significantly more than an undefined "some opportunities." And Hillary Clinton's victory is a victory for the war party.
    And this is a huge difference, and not a "small difference" as most political scientists want us to believe.
  23. Enoch
    Enoch 29 March 2016 10: 34
    +3
    What Trump, what Hilaya Clinton - they are all from the same Masonic cauldron. From the rearrangement of their places, the nations will not gain anything, except for those who cook kosher porridge in this cauldron - the descendants of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers.
    1. Kenneth
      Kenneth 29 March 2016 12: 56
      +1
      Well Clinton is without a doubt. But where did you get this about Trump. It just does not apply to the traditionally Masonic elites.
  24. Otshelnik
    Otshelnik 29 March 2016 10: 57
    +2
    Elections-the next season of Santa Barbara ...... Who will appoint him and will be a presidential)
  25. Taygerus
    Taygerus 29 March 2016 11: 24
    0
    there will be another talking head, that’s all, but if something that doesn’t talk like that, they’ll remove it, and they may not be as quiet as Kennedy
  26. pts-m
    pts-m 29 March 2016 11: 47
    0
    The main thing is that this lad, after ascending to the throne in the White House of Fashington, should remain mumbled over his statements during the election race of candidates. And so, from this side, the lad is reasonable in his statements. I'm FOR.
  27. Al_lexx
    Al_lexx 29 March 2016 13: 00
    0
    If Trump arrives, which now seems a little more realistic than a couple of months ago, then relations with the United States will be very difficult, but ultimately understandable. There will be a delimitation of spheres of interests and influences. Partially leave the policy of double standards. It is possible to establish some adequate technological and scientific contacts.

    If Clinton arrives, then pretty soon a nuclear shock will begin, and even a global nuclear conflict. The Middle East will continue to be cancer, terrorists feed and select, with all that it implies.

    For Israel, both options are not sugar, but the second seems worse. And this is the reaction of a rather powerful Jewish lobby in the Senate and Congress.

    In general, we live in an interesting time, comrades.
  28. skeptic
    skeptic 29 March 2016 14: 47
    +2
    But the visions about the return of Ayfonych are nightmare for me ...
    What is Trump or Clinton - the wheels of one train.
    They are not a threat. ..
  29. would
    would 29 March 2016 14: 49
    +1
    The author of the article in his reasoning made 2 main mistakes that make the article untenable

    1. This is not Trump's policy, not his convictions, this is the maximum of his election program. After he becomes president, he can begin to pursue a pre-prepared absolutely opposite policy without any remorse. He is a politician, they all do that.
    2. The US President does not have a certain supremacy and cannot single-handedly determine state policy. Obama also wanted to close Guantanamo (even issued documents), give all Americans medical insurance and a number of other things. The result we all know.
  30. alovrov
    alovrov 29 March 2016 14: 52
    0
    Trump is a dummy that the elite needs to organize a protest vote. Republicans at their congress nominated Trump, but will allow electors to vote at their discretion, which is not prohibited. As a result, in a protest vote, Clinton will sit on the lawn, which the elite is seeking. Without Trump, there’s no way to plant an ugly and vicious vixen on the lawn - it’s not elected under normal conditions. Therefore, there is such an escalation of the situation, but in fact all this is an ordinary show for a bored public.
  31. demiurg
    demiurg 29 March 2016 15: 09
    0
    What does a man not say to become president :)))
    But it is worth seeing who supports him, and with high probability you can predict his real political activity.
  32. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 29 March 2016 15: 46
    +1
    The question is systemic. The industrialists sat quietly as long as they could. But now the thief (synonymous with the words "financial oligarch") has exceeded all permissible norms. A certain number of thieves can be kept in the structure of the economy. They are even useful, paradoxically, but true. But giving power to thieves is wild!
    And this happened, and all over the world. And now the logical ending has hovered over all of us. Thieves lost shore, piling up fraud on fraud. Financial instruments, yeah. Tools for destroying the global economy, more precisely. And the thief can’t stop, it’s simply not capable!
    Trump, of course, does not become president. But the moment itself, when it is stopped, will be a signal for an open war between those who produce real values ​​and those who voraciously rob and seize power. It's just that America, and the whole world, has no choice.
  33. iouris
    iouris 29 March 2016 17: 05
    0
    These considerations are strongly strained on the topic of the US elections. As if we can win this election. In particular, I do not like conclusions like: "Trump - and order!"
  34. user3970
    user3970 29 March 2016 17: 33
    -2
    The Rockefeller controls the Fed and the printing press - this is the Anglo-Saxon elite. In his shadow is hiding the English bitch Lizaveta. But Rothschild, a Jew belonging to the highest caste - the LEVITS (see the Bible), with the SGA screwed together with money and gold (8 tons) to Shanghai and now brews soup with the Chinese and Russians (conspiracy version). Well, Trump would have won. Indeed, there would be an option to get into the pantheon of great politicians: Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev (regarding the latter: made America write in boiling water (Caribbean crisis), the former visited the SGA and liked the Americans). But not fate. In connection with the departure of Rothschild from the SGA, Rockefeller and financial usurious capital are unrivaled. By the way, banks in Russia rule.
    1. pimen
      pimen 29 March 2016 18: 00
      0
      if, suddenly, we recall the experience of Adolf Ailozovich (the night of "long knives") and carefully apply it to the families: Schiff, Leiba, Kuhn, Baruch, Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc., then, the next day the world will begin to sprinkle its head ashes
  35. user3970
    user3970 29 March 2016 18: 59
    0
    Bad, pimen, you know the story. The Wehrmacht fought more than 150 Jews. Among them were with iron crosses and generals and even General-Field Marshal E. Minh. And the Jews invented the Holocaust in order to get a gesheft from rich Germany. Pounding to this day. Jews are.
    1. pimen
      pimen 29 March 2016 19: 06
      0
      I am calm about the Jews who fought against us at the front. I'm more worried about the ones in the shadows. (Who surrendered their own under the "Holocaust")
      1. iouris
        iouris 30 March 2016 00: 33
        0
        Rather, they organized it.
  36. user3970
    user3970 29 March 2016 19: 26
    0
    Star in shock ! laughing So there was a holocaust? Are you Jewish ? And how do you feel about Ivan Susanin and Santa Claus? Are these real characters? good
    1. pimen
      pimen 29 March 2016 19: 32
      0
      somehow I do not "grasp" your logic. Try smaller emoticons
  37. romandostalo
    romandostalo 30 March 2016 00: 09
    0
    Damn, a very interesting pepper! Although all this may come around, it’s very interesting to see what will happen to American politics!
  38. tracer
    tracer 30 March 2016 04: 36
    0
    First-hand information so to speak .. That is, mine. I can say so because I visit the states all the time. I communicate mainly with the middle class, but sometimes, so to speak, with the establishment. This is the job. So all normal Americans are of course for Trump .. The retired warriors love him very much. Trump expresses the views of middle-class Americans and the establishment openly and unabashedly. Do you think everyone in America is "NUTUPY" and loves gomosyatina in all forms and everywhere? Otnyut..A normal average American loves his family, his home, his F 150 in the yard, is hardworking and doesn't drink. In general, normal people are all for him. And vice versa. If a person with a "zest" that is "a bullet in the head" for various reasons, then Hillary's candidate is beyond competition. By the way, in states with a predominance of black people, Hillary is very popular. Why? It's simple, the male population is employed in heavy, low-paid jobs during the day, and drugs and booze in the evening, and their wives do not like Trump because he is a "white racist." And Hillary is supported in anticipation of new "freebies". Such is the alignment of the US elections.