Verdict to Radovan Karadzic. There would be a Serb, and there will be an article in The Hague

64
... No, well, wait, and why we are worse. And it is not worse at all ... Therefore:
#FreeRadovan!

Therefore:
It was a parody of justice!

Therefore:
This is the shameful judgment of the Washington hangers-on!

Therefore:
The sentence to Karadzic is a consequence of the madness of Europe and the end of the concept of "European justice"!

And after all, we will be right a thousand times, since this is indeed a judgment seat and a parody of the justice system, if only because Karadzic didn’t do even a percentage of what those who started in his attitude, first military, then political, and and pseudo-persecution. We'll be right a thousand times, because the Hague Tribunal itself has long become a synonym for engagement and a tool for settling US accounts with those who once crossed their path, standing to death for their land and their people.

So, the ICTY (International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia) was sentenced against 70-year-old Radovan Karadzic, the first president of the Republika Srpska. South Korean judge O Gon Kvon “persecuted” such that any person familiar with the letter of criminal law is able to precipitate. In the process of the “multi-letter” verdict, Gon Kwon actually recognized Karadzic as guilty of why the individual presidents of the United States received the Nobel Peace Prizes ... And here even the term “double standards” fit very naively, because any double standards have at least some then the boundaries, but what they created in the ICTY does not have any boundaries (and especially reasonable ones). The verdict of the South Korean judge, during the trial (since 2009), who learned how to pronounce the name of the defendant and, probably, no more than diagonally acquainted with the events that Radovan Karadzic participated in, was 40 years imprisonment! ..

Verdict to Radovan Karadzic. There would be a Serb, and there will be an article in The Hague


According to Judge Gon, who (the opinion) is supposed to be shared with the judge by “responsible persons” from across the ocean, Karadzic is guilty of “killing and forcibly resetting civilians during the civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1992-1995”. Yes, yes, you heard right - the phrase "civil war" from the mouth of the ICTY judge sounded. In other words, the Hague Tribunal confirms the precedent created by itself - in any civil war, a third party is free to identify the perpetrators. And in fact any civil war should be a tribunal, which will identify the perpetrators. Hear, Mr. Turchinov, Mr. Yatsenyuk, Mr. Poroshenko ... Reveal! And dry ...

Gon revealed, and others will reveal. There is a precedent, and whether those who created the precedent themselves want it or not, they will also benefit from the provoked civil war in Ukraine.

The court in The Hague ruled that Radovan Karadzic was also guilty of the killings in Srebrenica, where, according to "witnesses", as many as 8 of thousands of Muslims were killed. And, of course, every single Karadzic was killed either personally or through an order ...

But how did it happen that Mr. Gon Kwon did not get acquainted with the statements of Radovan Karadzic from 1993 of the year, when he in Greece and Austria spoke about the political program for the restoration of Yugoslavia to maintain balance in Europe.

Here is the statement of Karadzic, which is even, surprisingly, on Wikipedia:
We never lived in the state of Bosnia, we lived in the Yugoslav Republic of Bosnia. Feel the difference? And today we don’t want to be part of the non-existent state of Serbia, we just want to maintain our indissoluble link with the Serbian people (...)

And this is not fanaticism, although our position irritates the world community, the Bosnian nation does not exist. Bosnia is a common home for three fraternal peoples. And we know Muslims and Croats a little better than the insidious foreign journalists who come to Bosnia for a few days.

That is why we have the right to ask Muslims and Croats a few questions: do we, the Serbs, have no right to distrust you, given your track record during the Second World War? Do you really think that we, the Serbs, will accept the dismemberment of Yugoslavia and the violent division of the Serbian nation? ...

The Muslims of Bosnia are our Slavic brothers. They suffer from their gullibility. Their leaders deceived the Muslims, promising them paradise beyond Yugoslavia. Bosnia can be restored only as a federal state, which at a certain stage will join the renewed Yugoslavia. Our common future cannot be imposed from outside, much less by force. weapons. Only to us - Serbs, Muslims, Croats - on the shoulder during the peace negotiations, having forgotten the strife, to define our common future ...


How does this platform of Karadzic generally fit in with the fact that "by his order they slaughtered women and children (Bosnian Muslims) in Srebrenica"? This, at least, is nonsense, and, more precisely, an obvious attempt to hide the obvious facts behind a heap of lies that did not fit into the fabric of accusation.

There is no Yugoslavia, and there is no European balance about which Radovan Karadzic spoke about 23 a year ago. Europe is in the process of "half-life", bombarded by "fast particles." And what this element, which turned out to be very unstable, will turn into an element - only God knows. Against this background, in The Hague they decided to convict a man who tried to save Europe from destruction. Europe has not heard then, does not want to listen to anything now. She generally lost the habit of listening and hearing the truth.

By the way, a group of judges in the ICTY seemed to have the courage to announce that they found exhaustive evidence of the commission of war crimes by order of Radovan Karadzic in several localities of Yugoslavia torn to pieces. The position of these judges could have an impact on the overall outcome for Karadzic if he was at least 30 years ... The fact is that the prosecutor requested life imprisonment for Radovan, but the “humane ICTY” gave “only” 40, only considering the current Karadzic’s age, this period looks like another “The Hague” hypocrisy and a parody of humanism ...

The sentence itself against the leader of the Bosnian Serbs looks no more than an attempt to justify the money invested in the Hague Tribunal. Like, we are working here - what about the new salary?

In general, there would be a Serb, and the ICTY will have an article ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    25 March 2016 06: 36
    Hear Mr. Turchinov, Mr. Yatsenyuk, Mr. Poroshenko ... Reveal! And dry ...

    These gentlemen may not worry. The Hague is not interested in them, and Moscow recognized as legitimate.
    There is a precedent, and whether the ones who created the precedent want it or not, they will also take advantage of the provoked civil war in Ukraine.
    Who draws attention to unnecessary precedents. Kosovo-Crimea precedent? And who is he interested in besides us?
    1. +12
      25 March 2016 06: 46
      Quote: aleks700
      and Moscow recognized as legitimate.

      And what does the recognition or non-recognition of Moscow have to do with it?
      Quote: aleks700
      Kosovo-Crimea precedent?

      No, there was no referendum in Kosovo, but in the Crimea!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        25 March 2016 07: 05
        And what does the recognition or non-recognition of Moscow have to do with it?
        And who will judge?

        No, there was no referendum in Kosovo, but in the Crimea!
        Moreover, besides us, this was of no interest to anyone.
        1. +12
          25 March 2016 07: 08
          Quote: aleks700
          And who will judge?

          Saddam also once recognized the whole world, but this did not stop him from hanging.
          As for the specifics, Ukrainians themselves will condemn.
          Quote: aleks700
          except for us, it was not interested in anyone, was not.

          Well, the whole world does not recognize Crimea as ours, and you don’t give a damn about it? I'm deep.
          1. +1
            25 March 2016 07: 41
            Saddam also once recognized the whole world, but this did not stop him from hanging.
            As for the specifics, Ukrainians themselves will condemn.
            Saddam was actually hanged by his Phashington partners (at least with consent). Ukrainians will judge the junta? Oh well.
            Well, the whole world does not recognize Crimea as ours, and you don’t give a damn about it? I'm deep
            Well here, yes. Me too.
            1. +7
              25 March 2016 10: 55
              Why be surprised ?! What is Washington and its satellites?
              Let us turn at least to the war crimes of Great Britain and the USA in the history of the Second World War. There are many of them - and with large unreasonable human casualties of the civilian population in the defeated countries. Moreover, the USA’s cynicism is that the United States itself did not suffer any territorial damage during World War II, because not a single bomb or shell fell on the territory of the United States.

              The British bombed Germany with phosphorus bombs and an incredible amount of incendiary bombs. And the number of bombers in the air raid reached 700 pieces. Hamburg became the first victim of British strategic aviation on the night of July 24-25, 1943. The temperature difference during explosions in the city reached 600-1000 degrees with the formation of tornadoes that have no analogues in nature (in natural tornadoes the temperature difference is no more than 20-30 degrees). A fiery typhoon that could not be stopped raged in the city for several days, and the smoke from it rose 6 km in height. In one week, such raids in the city died - 55 thousand of its inhabitants burned alive and suffocated, i.e. almost as much as in England for the entire war.
              Moreover, England did not go to Germany’s proposal for peace - she bombed German cities in cold blood.
              The worst fire storm was organized by British and American aircraft in Dresden on the night of 13-14 and from 14-15 February 1945. Dresden simply did not, and 60-100 thousand people died in the fiery hell.
              The United States ironed Japan no worse than Germany. March 9, 1945 by napalm bombs American pilots in Tokyo's fire storm destroyed 16,5 miles of metropolitan area. Killed 80-300 thousand inhabitants of Tokyo.
              The USA bombed Japan so hard that the destruction from 2 US atomic bombs accounted for only 6% of all the destruction that Japan suffered.
              See - N. Starikov. Who made Hitler attack Stalin? - St. Petersburg: Peter, 2015 .-- 368 p. - S. 349-362.
              Were these war crimes of England, the USA and France against the civilian population of Germany condemned by the post-war Nuremberg court along with the crimes of Nazi Germany? No, they were not.

              The double standards of the Nuremberg court were laid down from the outset, and convictions for war crimes were intended only against persons of the defeated side on the principle - "Winners are not judged!" and "Who is strong is right!"
          2. +6
            25 March 2016 08: 08
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Well, the whole world does not recognize Crimea as ours, and you don’t give a damn about it? I'm deep.

            The fact that you do not care is commendable! But our bankers don’t give a damn, mobile operators don’t give a damn, Google and Steam don’t give a damn ... Many people don’t give a damn! And this creates some discomfort for those living in the Crimea. Of course, you can beat everything and live like in the last century ... But IMHO the more correct way is the work of our Foreign Ministry to promote world recognition of the annexation of Crimea. Yes, even by the method of Catherine II - to put all the foreign ambassadors on a sled and take to the Crimea laughing
            1. +3
              25 March 2016 08: 45
              The fact that you do not care is commendable! But our bankers don’t give a damn, mobile operators don’t give a damn, Google and Steam don’t give a damn ...
              Spit in the sense we will not give up. In general, of course, we must fight for recognition.
            2. 0
              25 March 2016 08: 45
              The fact that you do not care is commendable! But our bankers don’t give a damn, mobile operators don’t give a damn, Google and Steam don’t give a damn ...
              Spit in the sense we will not give up. In general, of course, we must fight for recognition.
          3. +4
            25 March 2016 10: 01
            There are two sayings that explain the situation. The first is Woe to the vanquished. And the second - THE WINNERS ARE NOT JUDGED. The outcome of the trial was decided on the battlefield. The Serbs did not want to fight - now their leaders are being killed and judged. The outcome of the trial was known 20 years ago, and only wasting time in vain.
            1. +1
              25 March 2016 16: 06
              Why is there not Clinton in the dock who has given the go-ahead for the bombing of Yugoslavia, Bush for Iraq, Obama for Libya and Syria, as well as Karadzic?
              Euro Union leadership for supporting and participating in these wars. These are real criminals and not Karadzic who defended his people.
      3. +1
        25 March 2016 13: 44
        But is it not time to recognize the Hague Tribunal itself as criminal, and to institute proceedings against judges who passed unjust sentences that would be a warning to the next candidates of this court.
        1. 0
          25 March 2016 20: 45
          But is it not time to recognize the Hague Tribunal itself as criminal, and to institute proceedings against judges who passed unjust sentences that would be a warning to the next candidates of this court.

          This is possible only if the fields of Europe will be plowed by T-80s and T-14s, and not by Abrams and Leopards, and Sushki with Migars will patrol in the sky and the statute of the medal "For the capture of Washington" will be approved. Dreams Dreams..
    2. +4
      25 March 2016 08: 35
      Quote: aleks700
      Hear Mr. Turchinov, Mr. Yatsenyuk, Mr. Poroshenko ... Reveal! And dry ...

      These gentlemen may not worry. The Hague is not interested in them, and Moscow recognized as legitimate.


      Exactly, it’s hard to agree with the author. These criminals will NOT get there ...
      1. +3
        25 March 2016 10: 20
        Now they don’t get there, but Uncle Sam will need to fly.
        1. 0
          25 March 2016 15: 42
          Quote: jura61
          Uncle Sam will need

          "Uncle Sam" has the Somoza principle in relation to "his" sixes:
          Somosa is certainly a son of a bitch, but this is OUR son of a bitch
        2. 0
          25 March 2016 15: 42
          Quote: jura61
          Uncle Sam will need

          "Uncle Sam" has the Somoza principle in relation to "his" sixes:
          Somosa is certainly a son of a bitch, but this is OUR son of a bitch
    3. 0
      28 March 2016 08: 36
      A precedent there only goes after retirement: everyone's eyes open there, take the same prosecutor of the Hague Tribunal Carl del Ponte - after retirement, she wrote memoirs, in black and white, who and whom he cut, who let anyone go to the organs etc. And in the days of the prosecutors, she thought differently. 99% of politics and 1% of criminal law - these are the courts.

      If there was a Serb, but there would be a business ... Kosovo ye Srbija!
  2. +5
    25 March 2016 06: 37
    And upon the fact of any civil war, a tribunal should be created that will identify the perpetrators. Hear Mr. Turchinov, Mr. Yatsenyuk, Mr. Poroshenko ...

    As long as this ukrokaklovsky kennel has a master, these criminals will have nothing. As soon as the mericatos are poured into the toilet of the above, then it is realistic for them to get the dates.
    1. ICT
      +2
      25 March 2016 06: 42
      Sentence to Radovan Karadzic.


      By the way, you can stir up the exchange with Savchenko, there is also a couple of ours with American bunkers at the same time winked
      1. 0
        25 March 2016 08: 17
        They Savchenko - FSU. Do not go for an exchange!
    2. +2
      25 March 2016 07: 40
      Quote: aszzz888
      And upon the fact of any civil war, a tribunal should be created that will identify the perpetrators. Hear Mr. Turchinov, Mr. Yatsenyuk, Mr. Poroshenko ...

      As long as this ukrokaklovsky kennel has a master, these criminals will have nothing. As soon as the mericatos are poured into the toilet of the above, then it is realistic for them to get the dates.

      In the worst case, calm old age on a farm in Argentina with a blue pool and palm parrots.
    3. +3
      25 March 2016 08: 17
      Quote: aszzz888
      As soon as the mericatos are poured into the toilet

      They will merge when it will not be profitable for them. While they get a gesheft from it, they won’t merge it! Therefore, it is necessary to hit the most painful place - the dollar. And as long as we continue to invest billions of dollars in their bonds, nothing will change! It is fighting against us, and we continue to live peacefully, according to the old liberal rules - we withdraw our funds abroad and ask for loans from there ...
  3. +7
    25 March 2016 06: 40
    Well, yes ... Yugoslavia was destroyed by Europe with the USA .. Spitting on the Helsinki Accords ... and Karadzic is to blame ..
    1. +3
      25 March 2016 08: 11
      Yes, you have to judge ... But not Karadzic, And Bush Sr., Jr. and Obama at the same time
    2. avt
      +1
      25 March 2016 09: 15
      Quote: parusnik
      Well, yes ... Yugoslavia was destroyed by Europe with the USA .. Spitting on the Helsinki Accords ... and Karadzic is to blame ..

      Well, yes, it’s to blame ... It’s to blame for collecting the Serbs in arms against the creation of a former Nazi who recruited Muslims into the SS division and created Bosnia Herzegovina, the Saudi’s backbone base in Europe, using Saudi money. It really hindered the preparation of colonization by a new, aggressive population in the EU countries and the preparation of terrorist attacks.
    3. +1
      25 March 2016 10: 56
      What they sow is reaped. And the harvest they have already begun only the blind, do not want to see her
    4. 0
      25 March 2016 15: 45
      Quote: parusnik
      and Karadzic is to blame

      The loser is ALWAYS to blame - said in ancient Rome
    5. 0
      25 March 2016 15: 45
      Quote: parusnik
      and Karadzic is to blame

      The loser is ALWAYS to blame - said in ancient Rome
  4. +17
    25 March 2016 06: 51
    Having lost their head, they don’t cry through their hair. After the defeat of Yugoslavia, it became obvious that the West would destroy everyone who tried to resist. It would destroy without any pity and sentiment. So there is nothing to complain and shed tears. We must draw conclusions.
    1) In the capitalist world, the weak are destroyed, and even Russia, if it finally falls under the influence of the West, is destroyed with special pleasure and special cruelty.
    2) All attempts by the Russian authorities to first "fit" into the Western world, and then simply to come to an agreement with the West, are doomed to complete failure. We are not needed either as a "junior partner" or even more so as a strong competitor. Moreover, all attempts to make friends with the West, which, by the way, Yugoslavia was actively engaged in in the 80s, will only lead to the weakening of its own state.
    3) There is no need to appeal to some kind of "justice" to some kind of "moral norms." The modern West does not have any moral norms. There are interests and there is a language of force. And only they understand it.
    1. +2
      25 March 2016 07: 15
      Quote: Odyssey
      We are not needed either as a "junior partner" or even more so as a strong competitor.

      Liberals will object to you, the United States has always advocated a free, strong and successful Russia. laughing
      1. +10
        25 March 2016 08: 05
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: Odyssey
        We are not needed either as a "junior partner" or even more so as a strong competitor.

        Liberals will object to you, the United States has always advocated a free, strong and successful Russia. laughing

        US slogans always contradict their actions.
        The USSR was indeed a free, strong country.
        Successful appropriation of the riches of the Russian Federation by a handful of managers, the systematic withdrawal of capital from the economy, if it is success, then a small group of people, if freedom, then for all kinds of scammers.
        Now the United States does not recognize the right of Russia to be free, strong and successful. Any hint of upholding the interests of the country causes them fury, an attack of Russophobia in the Western media, peering independently from their pockets, is bursting with the sanctions of the State Department.
        State characteristics: aggressor state, fraudster and liar.
        1. 0
          25 March 2016 20: 52
          US slogans always contradict their actions.
        2. 0
          25 March 2016 20: 52
          US slogans always contradict their actions.
  5. +3
    25 March 2016 06: 51
    There is not the slightest doubt about the savagery and absurdity of the sentence itself, as well as about the competence of the judges. But if we take into account that this decision was rather a reminder to Serbia of the inappropriateness of its position and statements on Russia, then one cannot fail to note the undoubted humanity of this action. After all, as a hint, “Nord-Ost” could have been set up or a chemical plant, like in China, had been blown up. On the one hand, conspiracy theories, and on the other, the unforgettable Woland used to say that even a brick would not fall from the roof by itself.
  6. +3
    25 March 2016 06: 53
    Another parody of justice.
    1. +4
      25 March 2016 07: 19
      I absolutely agree with you. Due to bias and bias, the ICTY has outlived itself. It is necessary to create something new and independent.
      1. +2
        25 March 2016 08: 49
        This gang is controlled by s, and it was collected in order to humiliate the Serbs, Hashima Tachi, nicknamed snakes, is not judged for trading in human organs, but you say you need to create a new, independent one.
  7. +4
    25 March 2016 06: 53
    In general, there would be a Serb, and the ICTY will have an article ...
    And who would doubt it. They have a biased relationship with the Serbs.
  8. +2
    25 March 2016 07: 07
    Interesting. How can one judge a person of a non-existent state called Yugoslavia. It is right for all these "democratizers" that other dissident builders of societies began to spread rot against them.
  9. +5
    25 March 2016 07: 07
    I wonder whether the NATO generals will be judged. for bombing a peaceful country?
  10. +4
    25 March 2016 07: 18
    The bandits and the prosecutors have bandits and "laws" written by them. The verdict of a friend of Radovan once again confirmed this. Thank God, the Russian Federation has finally tried to challenge the priority of "instructions from external instances" over the internal legislation of the Russian Federation.
  11. +5
    25 March 2016 07: 18
    The ICTY was created in May 1993 to prosecute those responsible for violations of humanitarian law in the territory of the former Yugoslavia from January 1, 1991 until the date that the Security Council determines after the restoration of peace (resolutions 808 and 827). The resolution on the creation of the Tribunal was adopted unanimously [1].

    The Permanent Representative of Russia, presiding at a meeting of the Security Council on May 25, 1993, said: “Those responsible for mass crimes ..., for violating the laws and customs of war, crimes of genocide, and also against humanity must be punished with well-deserved punishment. Especially important is the fact that for the first time in history, not the winner judges the loser, but the entire international community, represented by the Tribunal, will render its verdict to those who grossly violate not only the norms of international law, but simply human ideas about morality and humanity ”[2].

    Powers [edit | edit wiki text]

    A bit of history.
    We surrendered Yugoslavia in due time. Now we owe.
  12. 0
    25 March 2016 07: 39
    There would be a Serb, but there is an article in The Hague

    As they say, comments are superfluous.
  13. +2
    25 March 2016 07: 45
    Quote: Gardamir
    I wonder whether the NATO generals will be judged. for bombing a peaceful country?

    Quote: Kos_kalinki9
    We surrendered Yugoslavia in due time. Now we owe.

    It is significant that the verdict was passed on the day the bombing of Yugoslavia began. The ICTY is an attempt to "blame it on a healthy one." So that they will not judge either the NATO generals or their presidents. As they will not judge either for Libya, or for Syria, or for numerous crimes. Remember the classic: "Who are the judges?"
    And unfortunately, the role of Yeltsin's Russia in the creation and "work" of the ICTY, in the fate of Yugoslavia, looks also unattractive. I tried to find out if there are judges from Russia in the current composition, but I did not find it. BUT the structure is impressive - over 1200 employees. So, with all the indignation, we are now paying for the ICTY out of our pockets.
  14. Riv
    +2
    25 March 2016 07: 48
    That's who Savchenko needs to be exchanged for ...
  15. 0
    25 March 2016 08: 05
    Ratko Samats, type in a search engine, it’s very interesting. We only save nuclear weapons from European lawlessness.
  16. +5
    25 March 2016 08: 24
    This is the true Western "fair" justice, which causes only vomit fool
  17. 0
    25 March 2016 08: 46
    In human society, not the right of justice, but the right of the strong ...
  18. 0
    25 March 2016 09: 07
    Take R. Karadzic and give Nagy the gunner and so forth their barefoot. Nehren to feed a hunger.
  19. 0
    25 March 2016 09: 38
    No trust in the courts! Neither Russian nor international
  20. +1
    25 March 2016 09: 49
    With what pleasure our Western "partners", through the use (here softened the term) of the Hague puppets, watched the trials of our first persons. After all, they have already stamped the articles - from Ukraine to peaceful ones in Syria. This is just the clearest example of their plans, and what awaits the country if we give up the slack on vital issues. These creatures sleep and see something to divide Russia. Yesterday, listening to reports on the Republika Srpska, I felt their cunning and insidious plan with my own skin. They are also lovers to act according to the established scheme. For the Middle East and 404 they have the same schema. For opponents stronger, like Serbia - another. How good and calm it is that we have thousands of nuclear warheads and serious air defense.
  21. hartlend
    +3
    25 March 2016 10: 57
    Author, do not toss beads in front of pigs. You need to have your own international tribunals and courts. For example, the international Anadyr court, the international Magadan tribunal. And questions will disappear.
  22. 0
    25 March 2016 11: 44
    the hour and day will come when the ICTY judges themselves will appear before the high court and be rewarded by them according to the merits of each
  23. 0
    25 March 2016 11: 53
    The court in The Hague is a court of victorious aggressors. All his decisions are criminal, taken after an unprecedented judicial red tape. Russian citizens are also kidnapped and tried in the USA. And how did the Russian administration respond to these actions aimed at diminishing the sovereignty of states?
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. -7
    25 March 2016 12: 41
    That's who Savchenko needs to be exchanged for ...

    By the way, you can stir up the exchange with Savchenko

    And why do we need karadzic? And by the way, why did you get the idea that he is innocent? Or do you think that Muslims are not people?
    1. 0
      25 March 2016 15: 58
      Have you seen at least one Croatian or Muslim accused, dear "Captain Sarcasm", in the dock in The Hague?
      The only justified (!!) - Milutinovich in 2008, in your opinion, is a Muslim?
    2. 0
      25 March 2016 15: 58
      Have you seen at least one Croatian or Muslim accused, dear "Captain Sarcasm", in the dock in The Hague?
      The only justified (!!) - Milutinovich in 2008, in your opinion, is a Muslim?
    3. 0
      25 March 2016 18: 54
      Guilty or not guilty, it is not up to the Hague tribunal to decide after the destruction of the state. Guilty is the whole leadership of NATO.
  26. 0
    25 March 2016 13: 22
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: aleks700
    And who will judge?

    Saddam also once recognized the whole world, but this did not stop him from hanging.
    As for the specifics, Ukrainians themselves will condemn.
    Quote: aleks700
    except for us, it was not interested in anyone, was not.

    Well, the whole world does not recognize Crimea as ours, and you don’t give a damn about it? I'm deep.

    Here we have our own analogue of the UN Hague and all that is necessary, to create a condemnation of all partners.
    1. 0
      25 March 2016 16: 03
      This is possible only after the SGA leaves the international arena and NATO self-dissolves - and this is pure "fantasy"
    2. 0
      25 March 2016 16: 03
      This is possible only after the SGA leaves the international arena and NATO self-dissolves - and this is pure "fantasy"
    3. +1
      25 March 2016 17: 57
      Here we have our own analogue of the UN Hague and all that is necessary, to create a condemnation of all partners.
      Not with this country's leadership.
  27. VB
    +1
    25 March 2016 17: 57
    And the Karadzic and Milosevic and Mladic, the West was sold by the Serbs themselves for thirty pieces of silver, for membership in the European Union, and they will creep into NATO. We are witnesses to the fact that the country in its entirety, ready ALWAYS to lay bones for Russia, is slowly betraying it. The wrong Serb has gone now ...
  28. 0
    25 March 2016 22: 25
    I have always been surprised by such a prejudice of the Europeans towards the Serbs, they are generally Christians too. But for the Albanian Muslims and Bosnians, the EU for some reason always has a wild and one-sided love, while they are quite officially the enemies of Europe. But here is any Serb for haggled Europeans - always an enemy ... And even a Serb who defended his homeland is an enemy squared ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"