Military Review

"Admiral Gorshkov" successfully hit a target in the Barents Sea

33
Frigate Admiral Fleet Soviet Union Gorshkov "during an arms test, fired from an A-192 gun mount in the Barents Sea, reports MIC with reference to the press service of the Federation Council.




"The crew successfully completed a series of firing at a naval target simulated by a towed shield",
says the release of the Northern Fleet.

It is noted that "at present, the frigate is being prepared for the testing of anti-submarine armament complexes, including with the implementation of practical firing at the simulated underwater target."

“Admiral Gorshkov” is the lead frigate of the 22350 project. He arrived in the Northern Fleet for the final stages of state tests of technical means and weapons last fall. To date, he has completed a series of tests related to the missile complex in the White Sea. In the Barents Sea, tests of various ship systems and mechanisms, artillery and anti-submarine weapons continue, ”the press service said.

Earlier it was reported that the frigate is scheduled to be transferred to the military in December 2016.
Photos used:
forums.airbase.ru
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 24 March 2016 17: 05
    -6
    successfully hit a target in the Barents Sea
    Well done! Close the right eye!
    1. MARK
      MARK 24 March 2016 17: 18
      +1
      New! ... Oh, there would be more such news ... We are restoring the Fleet slowly, EVERYBODY EVERYONE!
      1. Botanologist
        Botanologist 24 March 2016 18: 25
        +2
        Quote: MARK
        Restoring the Fleet slowly, BAD EVERYTHING!


        I'm interested in further development. As I understand it, we are no longer building ships of the OVR such as corvettes, since this option (protection of the area) goes "ashore". In the presence of Balls, etc. it turns out cheaper and more secretive.
        We began to pay attention to the expeditionary forces - for example, pr. 22160. re-preservation of a series of Ivan Gren and 20800 instead of the river Buyan.
        And if we open this topic to the end, then let's fantasize - what do we need and how much? Well, not counting the 4 AUG, of course, they’re not joking with the saint belay

        It seems to me that it will be very cool and generally cool if 2030-6 destroyers of the new project, 8 - 20 frigates and 24 20 units are in the fleet. For Black Sea Fleet, Northern Fleet and Pacific Fleet 22160-15 BDK and UDC.
        With the subfloor, everything seems to be clear, 8 Boreev and 8 Ash, well, 8-10 Husky and 30-40 DPL.

        This is so, Wishlist.
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 24 March 2016 19: 15
          +1
          Quote: Botanologist
          As I understand it, we are no longer building ships of the OVR such as corvettes, since this option (protection of the area) goes "ashore". In the presence of Balls, etc. it turns out cheaper and more secretive.

          Well, actually, the OVR ship is first of all an anti-submarine, how can "Ball" help here - I am decisively lost :)))
          Quote: Botanologist
          And if we open this topic to the end, then let's fantasize - what do we need and how much?

          Until 2030?
          8 Boreev, 7-12 Ash-trees (depending on how much development of the Husky will drag out), to 10-16 Husky. With DEPL probably got excited, pieces 20 extremely.
          The lead destroyer will be laid in a year of commercials in 2018, and even later, the head will be built and tested in the years 7, so 6-8 for 30 is very optimistic, rather 4-5. Frigates of 12 pieces, corvettes of a new type up to 20. Carrier cruiser in completion. Here is a mustache, perhaps.
          1. Botanologist
            Botanologist 24 March 2016 20: 57
            0
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            OVR ship is primarily anti-submarine

            The history of the fleet does not always confirm your thesis. We need PLO at the Northern Fleet and Pacific Fleet, but in the Baltic and the Black Sea Fleet and with surface ships only have time to turn around. As evidenced by the composition of the armament of corvettes - which they just did not hang on crying . A submarine in the SF is much more logical to provide aviation and diesel submersible, then you can’t get enough corvettes on our borders.
            Pacific Fleet is the same.
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            Frigates of 12 pieces, corvettes of a new type up to 20.


            Well, you don’t lower the frigates like that, 3 11356 on the Black Sea Fleet and 5-6 admirals only up to 2020 can be. So before 2030, IMHO, 20-25 is quite capable, and these ships will be very popular.
            And the corvettes of a new type - if they do not sculpt another prodigy like 20385, but something like 22160, then there will be more.
            Still, the hunter is more of a corvette than a floating battery.
            1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk 25 March 2016 18: 41
              0
              Quote: Botanologist
              The history of the fleet does not always confirm your thesis. We need PLO in the Northern Fleet and Pacific Fleet, but in the Baltic and the Black Sea Fleet and with surface ships, only have time to turn around

              Well, at the World Cup there are Turkish submarines, of a rather serious type, in order to cause us coastal troubles, we need to drive them.
              Quote: Botanologist
              A submarine in the SF is much more logical to provide aviation and diesel submersible, then you can’t get enough corvettes on our borders.

              Complexity wins here - of course, diesel-electric submarines and aircraft are needed, there are no questions, but a certain number of surface ships will also not hurt. They complement each other, and this is their strength. DEPl is not fast enough, and aviation does not have the opportunity to be on duty around the clock in the area.
              Quote: Botanologist
              Well, you don’t lower the frigates like that, 3 11356 on the Black Sea Fleet and 5-6 admirals only up to 2020 can be

              Where from? One Gorshkov, three more have been laid, and even where to get the turbines for construction is somehow unclear. Those. it is clear what Saturn will do in the end, but I strongly doubt that they will be in time before 2020. And then the destroyers will go, we need to make turbines for them ... And why do we need two dozen Gorshkovs - God forbid, I can't understand.
              Quote: Botanologist
              And the corvettes of a new type - if they do not sculpt another prodigy like 20385, but something like 22160, then there will be more.

              Wow, it’s easier to be with corvettes ...
          2. VP
            VP 25 March 2016 05: 34
            0
            How are things going with minesweepers?
            And BDKShki are not necessary?
            1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk 25 March 2016 18: 51
              0
              So tugs are needed too, and boats, but we do not have serious research here, but to chat. So we are limited to the main classes, and even then not all
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. 73bor
          73bor 24 March 2016 21: 01
          0
          20380 are being built at full speed, the ship has been worked out, the fleet needs about 20-25 units!
    2. In100gram
      In100gram 24 March 2016 19: 37
      0
      You don’t have to close your eyes there. Goal is better to see

      PS: Minus is not mine
  2. Good cat
    Good cat 24 March 2016 17: 15
    -1
    Ai maladtsa)))!
  3. Wiruz
    Wiruz 24 March 2016 17: 35
    +3
    As far as I remember, there was already such news. That's word for word. It would be better to say what's with Redoubt hi
    1. FenH
      FenH 24 March 2016 17: 45
      0
      Quote: Wiruz
      As far as I remember, there was already such news. That's word for word. It would be better to say what's with Redoubt hi

      Found nothing fresh request ,just this:-
      - And what do you want, since there was a strict technical task: to accommodate the overall complex in a small ship with a displacement of about 2,5 thousand tons? Due to the small size of the compartments, we were unable to accommodate many of the air defense systems and radar units, and the rest had to be seriously squeezed. All this could not but affect the effectiveness of the complex, but now we have found a technical solution, ”Izvestia’s interlocutor said.
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 24 March 2016 17: 51
        -2
        What a mess? Pots 5 kt weigh!
        1. FenH
          FenH 24 March 2016 17: 57
          0
          Quote: Wiruz
          What a mess? Pots 5 kt weigh!

          so they tested it on "Smart", but I did not find a new one in tests hi
          1. Wiruz
            Wiruz 24 March 2016 18: 05
            +1
            To blame hi
            But this is strange. In 20380 they could not stick, and in 20385 everything fit perfectly request
            1. FenH
              FenH 24 March 2016 18: 15
              +1
              Quote: Wiruz
              To blame hi
              But this is strange. In 20380 they could not stick, and in 20385 everything fit perfectly request

              "Smart" from episode 20380 belay and Redut’s tests were carried out on it, but according to open sources it’s not there. request
              1. Wiruz
                Wiruz 24 March 2016 18: 25
                +2
                Why? On the Savvy Redoubt there is - 12 VPU. This is on the lead ship of the project - the Guardian, instead of Redoubt there is Chestnut / Dirk / Broadsword / Palma / fig hi
          2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
            Andrei from Chelyabinsk 24 March 2016 19: 02
            +2
            Quote: FenH
            so they tested it on "Smart"

            Not. No one tested it there.
            On the frigate is "Polyment-Redut", consisting of the "Redut" air defense missile system and the "Polyment" radar, which combines the functions of a surveillance radar and a weapon control radar. This "sweet couple" must work together, they were designed for this. And on the corvette "POLIMENT" there was no way to place it. But I wanted to stage "Redoubt". So they put it - trying to teach the guidance of its missiles to the standard "Furke" radar
            But "Furke" is a surveillance radar (and not of the best), it simply does not pull control of the missile defense system (and should not - it was not done for that). It's like trying to make a sword from a penknife.
            All "shoals" on corvettes with a redoubt occurred not because the redoubt is bad, but because the combination "Furke-Redoubt" was initially vicious and ineffective. Well, the frigate has a normal Polyment, so the problems of the corvettes are not projected onto it in any way. Maybe something is wrong with the Peliment-redoubt, but it has nothing to do with opupea "redoubt" on the corvettes.
            1. Wiruz
              Wiruz 24 March 2016 19: 28
              +1
              We are not talking about Polement Redoubt, but about Redoubt. Still, these are different things, Redoubt - SAM, Polyment - FAR, although I do not argue, they thought for collaboration.

              As far as I know, on pr.20385 and new pr.20380 there will also be no Poliment, but there will be other headlights capable of issuing target designation to the aforementioned missile system

              hi
            2. FenH
              FenH 24 March 2016 23: 05
              0
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              Quote: FenH
              so they tested it on "Smart"

              Not. No one tested it there.
              On the frigate is "Polyment-Redut", consisting of the "Redut" air defense missile system and the "Polyment" radar, which combines the functions of a surveillance radar and a weapon control radar. This "sweet couple" must work together, they were designed for this. And on the corvette "POLIMENT" there was no way to place it. But I wanted to stage "Redoubt". So they put it - trying to teach the guidance of its missiles to the standard "Furke" radar
              But "Furke" is a surveillance radar (and not of the best), it simply does not pull control of the missile defense system (and should not - it was not done for that). It's like trying to make a sword from a penknife.
              All "shoals" on corvettes with a redoubt occurred not because the redoubt is bad, but because the combination "Furke-Redoubt" was initially vicious and ineffective. Well, the frigate has a normal Polyment, so the problems of the corvettes are not projected onto it in any way. Maybe something is wrong with the Peliment-redoubt, but it has nothing to do with opupea "redoubt" on the corvettes.

              Sometimes it's better to read than to write nonsense! Read here:
              http://vpk.name/news/76772_redut_ne_vyiderzhal_ispyitanii.html
              1. Alex_59
                Alex_59 25 March 2016 06: 49
                0
                Quote: FenH
                Sometimes it's better to read than to write nonsense! Read here:
                http://vpk.name/news/76772_redut_ne_vyiderzhal_ispyitanii.html

                Well, what did Andrei say wrong? This link also describes exactly the same, only excuses of representatives of the defense industry have been added. However, at the time this material was released (Autumn 2012), Redoubt didn’t really hit a single target when firing from a ship, which suggests that the position of the military, and not the defenders, is true. Information about the first successful interception of a target from a ship took place in June 2014. Obviously a little finished.
  4. 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 24 March 2016 18: 22
    +2
    Well, so he said about that. They found a solution and everything fit in 20385, only there will be only two of them, they will not finish the series, there are too many imported components. request
  5. egor1712
    egor1712 24 March 2016 18: 26
    0
    The Russian Navy plans to receive the frigate Admiral Gorshkov, the lead ship of Project 22350, in December this year. This was reported to reporters by the Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, Vice Admiral Alexander Fedotenkov
    Read more: http://vpk-news.ru/news/29788
  6. atamankko
    atamankko 24 March 2016 18: 34
    0
    The more tests, the more reliable the equipment in the ranks.
    1. Neputin
      Neputin 24 March 2016 22: 44
      0
      Yes, you are just "Captain Obvious"
  7. Bor
    Bor 24 March 2016 20: 43
    0
    What a handsome man !!! From such news the soul sings ...
    1. Neputin
      Neputin 24 March 2016 22: 43
      +1
      "We call this groan a song ..." Construction began in 2006! God forbid if they pass it in 2016 years! I see no particular reason for throwing caps into the air ...
  8. Manul
    Manul 24 March 2016 23: 15
    0
    Neither TTX is laid out nor the pictures of the gun mounts to conduct an educational program on the topic. It’s already scared by local specialists (whose royal people can not bother with such activities) to facial cramps belay God forbid something to try to reveal - at first suckers, and then in a crowd legs. So who is interested in reading on A-192 - a link to our resource hi http://topwar.ru/10168-a-192-novaya-artilleriya-dlya-novyh-korabley.html
  9. Ros 56
    Ros 56 25 March 2016 05: 26
    0
    Let's hope that those who are against Russia will also get theirs when their time comes, in large and small bills.