The strange logic of the Almaz-Antey leadership: “In order to save, we are preparing to reduce 30% of employees and are making efforts to maintain and build up our intellectual and human potential”

84
Against the background of the constant statements about the shortage of qualified engineering and working personnel in the country's defense industry sector, information is coming about upcoming reductions at one of the largest Russian defense enterprises. Information Agency TASS With reference to the leadership of the Concern VKO "Almaz-Antey" in the person of the general director Jan Novikov, he announces his readiness to reduce as much as a third of the personnel of the enterprise.

From the statement of the Almaz-Antey CEO:
In the second quarter of this year, the concern as a head company will have to optimize the staffing level of its employees. The planned amount of reduction in staff number of employees of Concern EKR Almaz-Antey JSC can be up to 30%. This is done due to the need for austerity.


As it turns out, austerity is not only measures to “optimize staffing”, but, as Yan Novikov put it, “other activities”. According to him, now the first place for the enterprise is the issue of saving resources.

Against the background of statements of readiness to reduce about a third of the company's employees, the management of Concern VKO Almaz-Antey declares the application of “efforts to preserve and enhance intellectual, personnel and production potentials”.

The strange logic of the Almaz-Antey leadership: “In order to save, we are preparing to reduce 30% of employees and are making efforts to maintain and build up our intellectual and human potential”


It is not entirely clear how the statement about the upcoming large-scale reduction fits with the statement about “efforts to increase the intellectual and human potential”. Or did 30% of the staff on Almaz-Anthei have stopped entering this potential for some unknown reason? ..
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    23 March 2016 13: 11
    The statement comes together just in a very understandable way, one word in words, but in fact a completely different one ...
    1. +23
      23 March 2016 13: 17
      Something still looks like a sabotage! From above! In the 90s, the collapse of the defense industry was obviously taking place, but now it’s no longer possible (so that it is clearly not visible!), But it continues quietly. Bankrupt, close, cut, seize! They cover, veil with crowds of new achievements, developments (many are just the legacy of the USSR!), Slogans about modernization, optimization! Combine, enlarge, reverse disconnect!
      1. +9
        23 March 2016 13: 22
        Sabotage, "generals" from the defense industry, they are tightening the screws, so there is opposition.
        1. +8
          23 March 2016 13: 31
          at one of the largest enterprises of the Russian defense industry ... CEO Yana Novikova announces readiness to cut as much as a third personnel of the enterprise.

          What is that????????
          Right now, the plywood "shortener" Rosvertol is popping up! And they are going to grab it !!!

          This is not
          Quote: cniza
          "generals" from the defense
          Not at all!!!
          It is HIGHSUPPLIED fans, novices of advisers-amerizraVShEy !!!
          1. +6
            23 March 2016 13: 38
            For the current optimization, 30% is some kind of absurdity. The same defense budget was reduced by 10 percent, not more. Plus inflation - a total reduction in production by 20%. This is a 10% reduction in staff, not more (the remaining 10% due to cuts in workload, salaries and bonuses is logical to carry out).

            Most likely, the production was developed in the future, but it became known about the upcoming additional budget cuts for the defense and the minimization of promising developments. It is sad.
            1. +2
              23 March 2016 16: 24
              Quote: Sensatus
              The same defense budget was reduced by 10 percent, not more. Plus inflation - a total reduction in production by 20%.

              For example, on the Vector (Zoos do), the defense order was reduced by five times ...
            2. +2
              23 March 2016 21: 45
              I will not say anything about the personnel, but the repairs (construction) at the Soyuz KMZ, which is part of Almaz-Antey, have been greatly reduced since last autumn ...
          2. +5
            23 March 2016 13: 39
            Quote: Baikonur
            What is that????????

            ... article is needed TO READ ! ... ah, do not browse! ... Already, there are NO cool words on YOU! ... written in black on paper ...
            Concern as a parent company already in the second quarter of this year will have to optimize the staffing of its employees.
            ... that is, abbreviation in Almaz-Antey as HEAD ENTERPRISE ! ... well, not just for ALL CONCERN ! ... which includes more than 57 enterprises! ... feel the difference ?! ... hi
            1. +4
              23 March 2016 13: 46
              1st line:
              Against the background of constant statements about the lack of qualified engineering and working personnel in the country's defense industry sector
              Or aren't the engineers at the head office? 30% - service staff or plankton? Then it's time! Let yourself brew coffee and scrub the floors. Stayed in the chairs of the campaign, these 70% of engineers!
              1. +4
                23 March 2016 14: 49
                Stayed in the chairs of the campaign, these 70% of engineers!


                It became funny. A first-hand story - becoming a teacher in the United States is difficult. You need to learn. But firing even an Alkash teacher is not just difficult, but impossible, the union will not.
                Here they throw 30% even loafers, and no one leads the ear. smile Or do the rest expect that the bourgeoisie is good, personally they will not trample later?
              2. +8
                23 March 2016 14: 55
                Quote: Baikonur
                Or aren't the engineers at the head office?

                At my work in 2008 there were cuts. The situation was as follows: for 100 hard workers, in our company, there were 500 office employees, after the reduction of hard workers there were the same number, and 300 office workers left. The engineering department was not cut, but they cut everyone’s salary there because of which, most of them ran into competitors, which negatively affected the future work of the company.
                Earlier, serious funds were invested in these employees - they were taken to England and Germany for training.
                When the founders realized what the joke was and why profits were falling, they fired the CEO but it was too late - you won’t get people back.

                PS
                The company is still in deep pope.
            2. +2
              23 March 2016 16: 28


              Inok10, and where did you see that the reductions at the top did not lead to a collapse below?

          3. +2
            23 March 2016 16: 19
            Quote: Baikonur
            These are HIGHLY DELIVERED fans, novices of the advisers-Americans

            GDP is not in the know again? wink
        2. +2
          23 March 2016 16: 24


          It seems to me that these "generals" from the defense industry are paid on the Potomac!

        3. +6
          23 March 2016 19: 59
          As it was considered, up to 25% of the wage fund actually goes to pay workers and engineers, and the rest to generals, advisers, and various mu-aks
        4. +1
          24 March 2016 10: 37
          Exactly, it feels like a comrade is bargaining or threatening
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        23 March 2016 16: 39
        And what has changed, what is not allowed in the open? What a stupid guess. Why not like 90?
    2. +1
      23 March 2016 13: 27
      Well, it’s clear that in 30% cleaners, retirees fall ... But how they increase this question. Where are the shots from?
      1. +4
        23 March 2016 13: 41
        Which (literary word prohibited on the site), having learned about mass reductions, now wants to get a job there? To be kicked out after half a year? Only a drunk and truant, which is not taken anywhere else.
        1. +2
          24 March 2016 10: 50
          My firm laid off about 5% of its staff last year. At the same time, there was not a word in the press (the company is world-famous). The very management of the words "dismissal, reduction, etc." fear like fire, speaks in the style of "who fired? We fired? We did not fire! We adapted the new business model and revised the staffing table, we removed some positions and did not fire people, positions and people are different things"
      2. +3
        23 March 2016 13: 43
        Well, it can be seen that cleaners, pensioners, fall in 30% ...

        as well as: builders, managers, marketers, economists, surveyors, lawyers, etc. AUXILIARY STAFF.
        1. +1
          23 March 2016 14: 58
          Quote: Lieutenant Izhe
          as well as: builders, managers, marketers, economists, surveyors, lawyers, etc. AUXILIARY STAFF.

          With a competent approach, it is.
      3. +3
        23 March 2016 13: 58
        Quote: Wend
        Well, it can be seen that cleaners, pensioners, fall in 30% ...

        "Menager" "fictitious" must be driven!
      4. 0
        25 March 2016 20: 00
        And where did the qualified personnel come from in shipbuilding, in rocket science, in tank production?
        They were supplied by the idle factories of Nikolaev, the Yuzhmash concern, the Malyshev Kharkiv plant and other drying up factories in Ukraine.
        1. +1
          25 March 2016 23: 53
          Storyteller. There, all personnel have long been retirement age. such cadres have low labor mobility, and with the influx of young people into enterprises there the last 25 years are even worse than in Russia. I know a person who worked as a student at Yuzhmash. Says there at the beginning of 2000 there was already a complete failure and collapse. We kept on one project of the sea launch and the development of another 60s ..
        2. +1
          25 March 2016 23: 55
          We kept on one project of the sea launch and the development of another 60s ..

          Moreover, for a long time there have not been any people who created these developments and changes, these people also did not wait and the experience was not betrayed to anyone.
    3. +2
      23 March 2016 14: 02
      at any enterprise, in any company - 25-30 percent can be safely driven. especially from the so-called managers .... for, ballast, serving time and receiving sn, for no reason ... (((
      1. +3
        23 March 2016 15: 05
        Quote: max73
        serving time ballast

        "head of the approval department" laughing
        We had one. What he was doing - no one knew. The "department" consisted of two people - himself and his deputy.
        Their main responsibilities, as I understand it, were as follows:
        1) To come, to work, in jeep.
        2) Dine in the dining room.
        3) Leave work.
    4. -1
      23 March 2016 14: 04
      parent company
      maybe not in the whole concern.
      I will assume:
      Reduce retirees (with exceptions of course) with the payment of 5 salaries. They have already prepared a shift for themselves.
      Promising students are taken to vacant places with further dropouts.
      Savings of the RFP fund for long-term service coefficients + youth are employed.
      Pence is a pity of course, but it's life!
      1. +5
        23 March 2016 14: 33
        Quote: vyinemeynen
        maybe not in the whole concern.

        A reduction option is possible as on Russian Railways, they will create sharashkin offices like Outsourcing companies that perform the same work as before, only for a lower salary by the same people, only without benefits, without work clothes, and other benefits from the company.
        In general, an effective dough drank close to the feeder.
        And those who are outraged, they say today you are looking for the truth and tomorrow work.
        And here is probably the same scenario. Alas.
        1. -1
          23 March 2016 14: 44
          And so it will be. For reductions - reduction, but work is necessary.
    5. +2
      23 March 2016 14: 26
      And where do you want to put the army at the gates of effective one-finger managers? They also need to live as it should laughing
      1. +1
        23 March 2016 18: 28
        It is the effective menagers who organize the reductions. In order for them to have enough money and not to share with anyone.
    6. 0
      23 March 2016 16: 23
      Just to say something. After all, if you keep silent and make a sour mine ..... everything is then clear, but not here ... as if it should be ....
    7. 0
      23 March 2016 17: 33
      it’s time to take to the streets if everyone leaves block Moscow, then the authorities will think ...
    8. 0
      23 March 2016 20: 37
      Quote: uhu189
      The statement comes together just in a very understandable way, one word in words, but in fact a completely different one ...

      reduction of the defense budget to 20 by 3 trillion. rubles because of the fall in the price tag of oil and the lack of funds to the budget, in short, as they were the raw material colony, they remained, I’m glad that there is oil left for 28 years, maybe the brains will turn on ...
  2. +2
    23 March 2016 13: 13
    Optimized, optimized, but not optimized? How strange it is to hear such speeches in anticipation of a possible big doaki! And then effective managers appeared?
  3. +11
    23 March 2016 13: 15
    Liberasts are finishing the economy. The first victims, as expected, in the military-industrial complex. Banks would be so optimized. Scum ...
  4. +1
    23 March 2016 13: 15
    He mayor of Kiev Klitschko is not a relative?

    I also could not grasp the meaning and logic of what was said.
    1. 0
      23 March 2016 13: 32
      These are most likely journalists - they again did not understand anything and threw porridge - who is the author of the article?
  5. +1
    23 March 2016 13: 15
    If this actually happens - there will be trouble for the defense industry, but if this is a campaign of convicting people who demand to cut everything (the liberal wing of the government), then it will be interesting for an average person to observe the course of events.
  6. FID
    +12
    23 March 2016 13: 15
    Well guess who will be reduced, and to whom they will add salaries ???
    1. +8
      23 March 2016 13: 24
      Quote: SSI
      Well guess who will be reduced, and to whom they will add salaries ???


      Highly skilled workers will be cut, and the "secretaries" will be paid more.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  7. 0
    23 March 2016 13: 17
    Is there a link to the resource, where did it come from?
  8. +2
    23 March 2016 13: 18
    In general, that is not entirely strange logic! Indeed, not all of the large number of employees are highly skilled. And with the advent of robotic technology, one million stokers are not required. You need to look at specific numbers. But the downsizing trend can be seen everywhere in the West too. This is a problem not only of the present, but also of a bigger future!
    1. +2
      23 March 2016 13: 27
      In general, that is not entirely strange logic! Indeed, not all of the large number of employees are highly skilled. And with the advent of robotic technology, one million stokers are not required. You need to look at specific numbers. But the downsizing trend can be seen everywhere in the West too. This is a problem not only of the present, but also of a bigger future!

      it wouldn’t have been strange if it hadn’t seen a trend in most of the country's enterprises. Optimization is good, but as many people say correctly, the reduction for some reason concerns the producers, and not the bosses. Moreover, for the most part, superiors are very far from production — they are simply effective managers or managers. hi
    2. +1
      23 March 2016 14: 40
      In general, that is not entirely strange logic! Indeed, not all of the large number of employees are highly skilled. And with the advent of robotic technology, one million stokers are not required. You need to look at specific numbers. But the downsizing trend can be seen everywhere in the West too. This is a problem not only of the present, but also of a bigger future!

      It is certainly understandable that the world is heading towards inhuman technologies, but a normal boss should think primarily about people.
  9. +6
    23 March 2016 13: 19
    As usual, there are five bosses per worker ...
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +6
    23 March 2016 13: 20
    It is necessary to reduce the administration, which has been exorbitantly inflated, but they will probably not go for it, because it is there that a bunch of useless thugs parasites who receive huge salaries work.
  12. +4
    23 March 2016 13: 20
    How everyone loved the word "optimization", every day I hear it from different angles ...
  13. +3
    23 March 2016 13: 22
    That's right! Shorten the manual for
    “Efforts to preserve and build up intellectual, personnel and production potentials”
    . When they themselves do not know, then they say it correctly)))
  14. +8
    23 March 2016 13: 23
    Strange statement. A 30% reduction in staff usually occurs before the closure of a manufacturing plant, when there are no orders and no work.
    Did the army stop ordering air defense systems? Or have they bought robots that can replace humans?
    Some rotten smell comes from this news.
    1. 0
      23 March 2016 13: 30
      Maybe he was misunderstood - to reduce the cost of manufacturing products by 30%.
      1. Alf
        +1
        23 March 2016 18: 55
        Quote: Vadim237
        Maybe he was misunderstood - to reduce the cost of manufacturing products by 30%.

        At whose expense ?
  15. +5
    23 March 2016 13: 24
    Yes it is called - blackmail! Give me money, otherwise we will start firing people. Since it is really possible to restore order and save resources, to increase labor productivity - this is troublesome, simpler like this - like, if you don’t want popular rallies for elections - give me a lot of money ... This is the first sign. If the government follows these blackmailers, we will hear about others.
    1. +4
      23 March 2016 13: 43
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      This is the first swallow. If the government follows these blackmailers, we will hear about others.

      So it forces us to do so, creating conditions.
  16. +4
    23 March 2016 13: 26
    Interesting. From where they will begin to “optimize”, from the head al from the tail. As people say ... the fish rots from the head, but they clean it from the tail ...
  17. 0
    23 March 2016 13: 29
    There is a process of revealing from the hiding: who is with us and who is against There is a process of revealing from the hiding: who is with us, and who is against.
  18. +6
    23 March 2016 13: 33
    So they got up from the knees as they put us in 91 on the shoulder blades so we hike and we lie on them and the people will throw a bone for us not to be indignant and there wasn’t any kind of getting off our knees, at least minus your eyes. Thatcher said 15 millionaire would be enough to service the pipe. A man is all going to this. Our guarantor will have the same librarian clip. If he had been doing it for the people for a long time, tell the people that it’s wrong to think and reflect.
  19. +2
    23 March 2016 13: 33
    nothing surprising. Dmitry Medvedev recently voiced about future reductions at enterprises. Only at our enterprise there were already 2 reductions in 3 months. There was no sabotage. Crisis.
  20. +4
    23 March 2016 13: 35
    Reduce workers and are going to raise their retirement age by quiet glanders !!! And where to work ??? After 60 years?
    1. +7
      23 March 2016 14: 50
      Quote: tochila
      Reduce workers and are going to raise their retirement age by quiet glanders !!! And where to work ??? After 60 years?
      Do you still think that the problems of the person (except those that generate income) are of interest to the employer? Russia has yet to go the way of strikes, strikes, and the creation of independent trade unions. Lawlessness can only withstand force, and God forbid that this would happen in the legal field.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  21. +2
    23 March 2016 13: 35
    Yes, KRET has such a hell of a lot of rubbish ... optimization .. outsourcing .. as a result of all the land and the area of ​​the plants for rent or demolition for supermarkets
  22. +4
    23 March 2016 13: 35
    Many media outlets at one time associated with the Almaz-Antey concern a number of high-profile contract killings that received wide publicity in the 2003-2009 years. The motive is not the main activity of the concern or related weapon secrets, but the criminal redistribution of property of the enterprises included in the concern.

    Is it not here that the dog rummaged, the kids at the remodelers grew up, it’s time to attach to the business.
  23. -3
    23 March 2016 13: 37
    In Diamond, you can safely reduce 70%, this is the ballast left over from Soviet times. There are 10 parasites per engineer. in the USSR it was understandable, employment, retraining, etc. cost more than just keeping crowded staff with a small salary. Now, an intelligent engineer should receive it sensibly, he needs an incentive, a motive, respectively, stupidly there will be no money left for snipers. So everything is correct. We want to have the best complexes in the world, we need to attract sensible ones and free ourselves from ballast.
    1. +2
      23 March 2016 19: 45
      It is not serious what an intelligent engineer can produce without qualified workers? And how much does a engineer need to pay a miracle to replace one whole workshop?
      1. -1
        23 March 2016 20: 43
        Nobody is cutting off skilled workers and is not going to, because this will affect the efficiency of the concern. You can see completely off topic.
        1. 0
          24 March 2016 11: 36
          Once you are in the topic, then explain: who is this 70% ballast?
  24. +5
    23 March 2016 13: 40
    It seems it's called "project management". Oh well. Then 80% of the population of the Russian Federation can be reduced.
    1. +2
      23 March 2016 15: 02
      Quote: iouris
      Oh well. Then 80% of the population of the Russian Federation can be reduced.
      You can't! Someone should be cheap labor, someone should feed officials, “businessmen”, effective managers. And the population of the Russian Federation was reduced in the 90s in quantity, which the "bloody Stalin" never dreamed of.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -3
      23 March 2016 20: 46
      Sometimes it's better to be silent than to write nonsense. Project management is another, learn the materiel.
  25. +3
    23 March 2016 13: 42
    That would be the language of revenge, it is necessary from the beginning to take a little interest in the personnel component of this concern.
    http://www.almaz-antey.ru/355
    Qualitative and quantitative composition of employees of subsidiaries and affiliates of the Concern
    As of 01.01.2014, the payroll number of employees of subsidiaries and affiliates amounted to 98 people.
    The number of employees with higher education in the Concern's subsidiaries and affiliates is 38. (439% of employees).
    815 employees have a scientific degree of a candidate of sciences, 127 employees have a doctor of science.
    The average age is 47 years, the average age of the main production workers and development specialists is 46 years. Wherein:
    workers under the age of 40 years - 38% of the employees, of which under the age of 30 years - 20%
    workers older than 50 years - 46% of employees.
    1. -1
      23 March 2016 20: 44
      And what follows from your statistical calculations?
    2. -1
      23 March 2016 20: 44
      And what follows from your statistical calculations?
  26. +2
    23 March 2016 13: 44
    It’s impossible to reduce personnel, you need to load and work with their work, there are a lot of cases in the country ...
  27. +3
    23 March 2016 13: 49
    Deputy Prime Minister and curator of the social block in the government Olga Golodets
    “Indeed, unemployment is not growing in our country, but we have a very sharp drop in income. Sharp in terms of both the real level of wages and incomes in general,” she emphasized at the Russian Business Week.

    According to the Deputy Prime Minister, "all this is reflected in the decline in the purchasing power of the population," as well as retail turnover, which is declining at a "serious" rate.

    It began to reach the giraffe that it had already been optimized. It’s not people who are being cut, but salaries, forcing them to work for 8000 rubles. This is one of the anti-crisis measures of the Medvedev government, which has reached the military-industrial complex. In words, one as always, and the execution of the seams!
  28. 0
    23 March 2016 13: 52
    The news is about nothing. Being prepared to cut back doesn't mean doing it.
  29. +12
    23 March 2016 13: 53
    A joke came to mind:
    They built a bridge over one stream.
    For strategic reasons, a watchman was assigned to him: bridges should be guarded.
    For payment of work the watchman was allocated the cashier. For the reporting procedure, they took an accountant.
    For the general management, a manager was appointed ... But here came an instruction to reduce staff. The guard was fired.
    1. 0
      23 March 2016 14: 07
      As usual, it happens with us. laughing
    2. +1
      23 March 2016 14: 30
      Yes, this is a joke relevant now, sad of course, but so do many employers.
    3. +1
      23 March 2016 15: 07
      Quote: rvn69
      A joke came to mind:
      This is not a joke! That's life! When optimizing, they reduce performers, but there is no leadership, well, how without leadership?
      1. +1
        23 March 2016 15: 25
        Quote: fif21
        When optimizing, they reduce performers, but there is no leadership, well, how without leadership?

        Manual in such cases is also being reduced, but after optimization.
  30. +5
    23 March 2016 14: 28
    Officials and deputies of all stripes would cut their salaries by 30%, that would be the case, but where there .... people will be pressed to the last, social tension is growing !!!
  31. 0
    23 March 2016 14: 34
    Gomomrazi begin the offensive. How much did they pay for the collapse of the Russian Federation? This should be immediately prevented - to the wall, without trial or investigation as terrorism.
  32. +4
    23 March 2016 14: 36
    Quote: uhu189
    The statement comes together just in a very understandable way,


    Absolutely right! If we reduce the bookkeeping, personnel department, analytics and forecasting department, near and long-term prospects department, marketing department and even small things by 10%, then the overall reduction, as a whole for the company, will make up 30%.
  33. +2
    23 March 2016 14: 59
    There are thoughts that "effective" managers will remain, and who really works will go outside the gate. at one time faced with this at St. Petersburg "Arsenal"
  34. +3
    23 March 2016 15: 47
    I would like to think that all these 30% are "effective" managers, but alas. Our elite will not deprive themselves. Their salaries will still be in the millions, but optimize throw 30% of employees of a strategically important enterprise onto the street - this is welcome!
    Recently, the 37th year is more and more remembered ... am
  35. 0
    23 March 2016 16: 01
    The question immediately arises, but Yan Novikov does not accidentally belong to the clan of Russian liberals? After all, their task, the worse for Russia, the better for them. They are preparing to flee abroad, and there they will not feed without merit. So they work out their bright future. The accounts are there, the children are there, studying at the best educational institutions, and all at the expense of Russia. After all, the West pays them for the collapse of Russia and its economy, so the liberals are trying, but quietly, quietly, imperceptibly, beloved.
  36. VP
    0
    23 March 2016 17: 07
    What does the machinations of various liberals and other things?
    I will explain with an example with which I am familiar.
    One enterprise (high-tech, doing very advanced things for the defense industry), shortly before the crisis, decided to expand and modernize.
    This helps him to work out orders normally. But loans hang on it, including foreign currency. Which, as everyone understands, now costs not quite as much as they cost when they were taken.
    And now it’s hard to refinance.
    The company gets out, it has a good share of foreign orders for civilian. But the increase in salaries certainly cannot be discussed.
    If someone is in the same situation, especially if there were targeted sanctions against him, then everything is complicated.
    On the other hand, in the end they will unload the credit and become stronger at the exit.
  37. Oml
    +3
    23 March 2016 17: 10
    Why is it that this happened, there were no computers — two typists and two financiers (nachfin and treasurer) worked for everything about the regiment, with their introduction - the AUV group, the dates in general have fourfold amplification, but most importantly, the results have not improved?
    1. +1
      23 March 2016 17: 27
      there were no computers ... but most importantly, the results have not improved?

      Because next to the "computers" there are still ... calculators.
    2. +2
      23 March 2016 17: 47
      Reporting to all instances has increased "at times". Officials also need to do something. And in general, the less production, the more bureaucrats. angry
      1. The comment was deleted.
  38. +1
    23 March 2016 17: 56
    It is very likely that "agents of influence" are in the top management of Almaz-Antey. They have large accounts in foreign banks and have already been informed that if they develop Almaz-Antey, their accounts will be blocked. Now it is not possible to act as in the 90s, but it is quite possible to gradually destroy the enterprise.
    1. 0
      23 March 2016 20: 45
      Almaz-Antey on the issue of Boeing’s catastrophe lit up, someone did not like it very much.
      Perhaps the truth about Boeing should be hidden by the hegemon and his vassals.
  39. -1
    23 March 2016 18: 31
    Production is not a charitable organization, and if for a given volume of production fewer people are needed, then costs must be reduced, that's right, just like any modernization of production makes many workers unnecessary, in Russia there is a very low labor productivity so mass cuts as a result of modernization in production are inevitable .
  40. +1
    23 March 2016 23: 23
    An "effective manager" at work as usual.
    Whether it will still be after the planned "new privatization" :-(
  41. 0
    24 March 2016 06: 47
    These gopmenezhkrov should be dragged out to the parliamentary commission for hearings and let the defense committee prove the necessity of their actions with figures in their hands. And then what, let's make a noise, we’ll spit, and what will change?