Military Review

Asad has no doubles

92
Normalization in Syria without its current leader is impossible


Syria today is personified in Bashar Assad, historian and publicist Nikolai Starikov is convinced. It is distinguished by a non-standard view of both processes in the past and modern events.

- To what extent did the stated goals of our leadership for entering military contingent in Syria correspond to the true ones?

- I believe that the declared goals are fully consistent with the plan. After all, the main task of Russia is to stop the process of extermination of states and the chaos of the Middle East, which the United States launched. In the end, we must strive to prevent the aggression of the terrorist organizations created by the Americans against Russia through Afghanistan and other countries. If sovereign states are restored in the Middle East, then terrorist groups on their territory simply cannot exist. In this regard, Russia's policy is fundamentally different from that of the States, which, under the guise of a struggle for democracy, simply carry out the destruction of states with the subsequent imposition of terrorism.

Asad has no doubles- To wreak havoc is not the most understandable goal of US policy. Probably, this is still an intermediate result of some other aspirations ...

- Before us is a new type of war - someone calls it a hybrid one, someone wants to come up with some other name for it. Russia has a serious nuclear arsenal. weaponsthat in theory is a guarantee of non-aggression on us from any other state. Here is the key word "state". And if the Russian Federation is attacked not by the state, but hundreds of thousands of militants of some unrecognized structure are crossing the border and trying to invade our territory? It is clear that the border guards and troops are beginning to resist the invasion, but this raises the question of the possibility of using nuclear weapons in such a situation. Obviously, from a legal point of view, this is impossible - after all, the neighboring state did not declare war on us, moreover - in fact it is itself a victim of the same terrorist formations. Thus, our "partners" withdraw armed confrontation in the area where the presence of nuclear weapons will no longer play any role. And it is no longer a guarantee against aggression. And if we add to this the likelihood of an enormous mass of militants attacking certain third states with subsequent sad consequences for Russia, then the whole picture will play with completely new colors.

I mean the countries of Central Asia. Poor enough, with strong contradictions within - in this very Tajikistan it was precisely for this reason that there was a civil war. And the invasion of militants in this region will instantly increase the terrorist army to almost millions. Can Russia look to this process as an outsider? Maybe - if it is headed by a close-up leader, confident that this will not concern us in any way. But in fact, Russia should try to prevent such a development of events. Just the situation in which the possession of nuclear weapons will not help us.

- Hybrid war on the model you described - the result of a random development of events, which turned into a phenomenon, or is the strategy and tactics of such actions born in the depths of the Pentagon, what kind of structure?

- Modern terms come up often for those phenomena that have long been known and more than once implemented in practice. Hybrid warfare is no exception. If we take a look history the colonial wars of Great Britain, we shall see: in many cases it did not declare war, while carrying on full-fledged military operations. Guns shoot, but there is no war. It means that any diplomatic actions to prevent aggression are impossible. He knows the history and cases when a certain third force, formally unrelated to the state, was used - the same “East India Company”, which carried out actions to seize India and other countries. As for the XX century, a very characteristic episode is the invasion of Japan into the territory of China at the beginning of the 30s. And despite the fact that there were hundreds of thousands of victims from the Chinese population, this war is not part of the overall history of the Second World War. Until 1939, as it were, there was none. So a war without a declaration of war is not in our day invented.

- The reasons for the introduction of troops into Syria, or rather, his motives in this context become much clearer. But just as the entire Western world was shocked by the swiftness of entry, it was also at a loss from the swift decision to withdraw, albeit partially, our contingent. No one expected.

- I am a civilian, but as far as I understand the principles of military tactics and strategy, all the actions of the command of any army should be unexpected for the enemy. This is due to several reasons - and in order to not have time to react, and that it was difficult for him to predict the actions of the opposing party. As for the situation in the Middle East, Russia demonstrates just such unexpected actions. Why? Because we are bombing terrorists on the ground, but in fact we oppose the evil will of those powers that arm them, supply, direct, share intelligence with them and transmit the most modern weapons systems. The confrontation is not with some intelligence of the IG, but with the American and British intelligence services, respectively, the actions must be unexpected and decisive, so that the enemy cannot calculate them for several moves. It is necessary to understand that the geopolitical struggle between Russia and the West continues, even when such alleged “cooperation” is going on, as in Syria. And then the actions of the Russian leadership will immediately become clear and logical.

- Actions of Russia in Syria - what and to whom should they show?


- The brilliant operation of our aerospace forces is, of course, not only advertising our weapons. The main thing is the determination of our leadership to protect the geopolitical interests of Russia in arms, despite the position of other states. The whole world must understand that international law must be respected, that it is impossible to arbitrarily destroy a sovereign country and that we are ready to defend this right, supported by the UN Charter. After Syria, our leadership forces others to reckon with Russia's position in a much larger volume than it was before Syria.

Our president several times, explaining the basics of geopolitics, used the analogy of street fights. Here it is also appropriate. If you show the will to protect your interests, you enter once in a fight, even if with those who are obviously stronger, you may be beaten. But they will not want to contact you in the future, since it is obvious that you can smash your nose, but the attacker's broken noses will be the answer. As a result, your interests will have to be taken into account by everyone else.

Russia has always been one of the main players in world politics. Without our permission, as they used to say, not a single gun in Europe fired. Then we reached the level when the “guns didn’t shoot” on a global scale. The entire state defense system built on the blood of our soldiers was destroyed by Gorbachev. Yeltsin and others like them. Now it is just being restored.

- What awaits Syria, do you think?


- Now for Syria the main thing is the preservation of statehood. Yes, now a part of the territory is in the hands of Kurdish formations, which will reluctantly accept Damascus’s restoration of control over these areas and will negotiate autonomy. In this situation, the Americans will incite the Kurds to the complete disobedience of the central Syrian government, promises to support "full independence" to incline them to continue the struggle. Some provinces still remain under Islamist structures, so the transition of Syria to full control over its territory will require a sufficiently long period. The main thing is that today the question of the elimination of the central government, which would mean the destruction of Syria as a sovereign state, has been removed from the agenda.

International politics is a difficult question, but I can draw a hypothetical picture when everything may look different. God forbid, but imagine for a moment that something happened personally with Bashar Asad. Is there still a figure in Syria who is also resolutely ready to take responsibility for the state and the people? We will not answer this question on the fly. Western intelligence agencies often achieved their goals, physically eliminating political leaders. Recall Libya. When could it be said that the country is no more? At the time of the brutal murder of Muammar Gaddafi. While he was alive, hopes for the preservation of Libyan statehood remained. Syria today is personified in Bashar Assad, whether someone likes it or not. Therefore, with all the forces you need to protect Assad now, to wish him good health and political wisdom. I think he will be an example of a courageous struggle for the interests of his people. After all, no one, including the Americans, had expected that an ophthalmologist who studied in Britain, completely integrated into the Western environment, would prove to be such a staunch fighter for the interests of his people.

- He is accused of using chemical weapons ...


- It is a myth. If there had been evidence, they would have arranged a court in The Hague a long time ago, all the evidence is too similar to falsification. Please note: when Russia pulled Syria out from under the impending bombings, let us recall the brilliant move with the proposal to export chemical weapons, the Americans immediately moved the center of tension closer to our borders. Then the events began in Ukraine. At that time, there was no talk of Syria in Syria - there was the Syrian Free Army, Al-Qaida. And in a couple of years the most powerful jihadist movement has risen. Experience teaches that weeds do not grow above human growth unless they are specifically watered.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/29834
92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Concept1
    Concept1 23 March 2016 21: 48
    +23
    It is necessary to vote for Starikov in the fall.
    1. Pravdarm
      Pravdarm 23 March 2016 22: 02
      +8
      What is this blatant agitation?
      You can say anything!
      And before the election, everyone speaks beautifully and fluently!
      And in all topics, spices!
      And they know how to do everything, so that all will be happy!
      The article agrees. I emphasize in Central Asia! There you definitely need to keep your finger on the pulse! And in every possible way to strengthen cooperation and joint security. The USA will definitely use this direction! Moreover, it is purely Islamic!
      1. Concept1
        Concept1 23 March 2016 22: 18
        +21
        Yes, this is agitation ..)

        Because in the fall, elections and voting for those who are currently sitting in the Duma makes no sense whatsoever.

        Party of singers and athletes club for business interests, party of old outsiders, the party is nothing and the party of tantrums.
        1. Pravdarm
          Pravdarm 23 March 2016 22: 30
          +8
          Quote: concept1
          Party of singers and athletes club for business interests, party of old outsiders, the party is nothing and the party of tantrums.

          This is clear! Only you say you need to vote for Starikov.
          At least they said: "I will vote ...!"
          PS: Oh, how! the very first two comments (within 10 minutes after the publication of the article (rather big) from "concept1" and "Mavrikiy" and immediately 2 minuses to me! Is it the authors or Internet helpers ?! , comrades! Dirty! Minus not I put!
          1. Concept1
            Concept1 23 March 2016 22: 35
            +4
            I can not a citizen of Kazakhstan ..)))
            1. Pravdarm
              Pravdarm 23 March 2016 22: 41
              +1
              Then they would say: "If I could, I would vote for Starikov!"
              Quote: concept1
              I can not a citizen of Kazakhstan ..)))

              Again, you can say anything! And the traffic through Kazakhstan here and the Russians and others can direct!
              1. Concept1
                Concept1 23 March 2016 22: 46
                +3
                The election campaign is gaining momentum ...
              2. aksakal
                aksakal 24 March 2016 00: 02
                +10
                Quote: Pravdarm
                Again, you can say anything! And the traffic through Kazakhstan here and the Russians and others can direct!
                - No, it is NECESSARY for you to vote for Starikov! The concept was not mentioned. Be indignant, do not be indignant, and air defense must go to the Duma.
                1. Sober
                  Sober 24 March 2016 08: 56
                  0
                  Quote: aksakal
                  It is NECESSARY to vote for Starikov!

                  Wow, that someone spoke specifically, and not pathos.
                  1. Pravdarm
                    Pravdarm 24 March 2016 12: 08
                    +2
                    You said further there
                    Quote: Sober
                    Quote: Sober
                    Quote: aksakal
                    he wrote a bunch of books

                    He has been writing a lot for a long time. He writes what he thinks, his opinion does not change. And long before they think it was promoted. Which is, all in the palm of your hand.
                    I know about 20 years of his book.
                    He made his debut as a writer in 2006. The author of 15 books.
                    WIKIPEDIA at least take a peek! 20 years ago he was 26 years old.
                    In 2002, he participated in the elections to the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg, but lost by gaining 230 votes (0,95% of the number of voters) [9]. At the time of the nomination, he worked as a sales manager for CJSC Europe plus St. Petersburg [10]. Currently, he is the commercial director of the St. Petersburg branch of Channel One.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. RUSS
                      RUSS 24 March 2016 15: 07
                      +2
                      Quote: Pravdarm
                      Currently, he is the commercial director of the St. Petersburg branch of Channel One.

                      Starikov is neither a historian nor an economist, Starikov a businessman and a party created to earn. And the party of his poppycock populist, will not gain even 1 percent!
          2. Sober
            Sober 24 March 2016 08: 53
            +1
            Quote: Pravdarm
            Is that the authors

            These are not the authors. You can understand a lot about articles and comments.
        2. Was mammoth
          Was mammoth 23 March 2016 23: 26
          +1
          Quote: concept1
          Yes, this is agitation ..)

          And how did they vote in Kazakhstan? What are the results?
          Quote: concept1
          Because in the fall, elections and voting for those who are currently sitting in the Duma makes no sense whatsoever.

          Vote for parties that are unlikely to go to the Duma; vote for EP.
          It doesn’t bother you that the same person faces the TV controlled by EP, including Starikov. And he speaks beautifully, convincingly!
          Have you heard about PR?
          Quote: Corporal Valera
          It depends on what program he will have.

          wink
          1. Pravdarm
            Pravdarm 23 March 2016 23: 41
            -1
            Quote: There was a mammoth
            Vote for parties that are unlikely to go to the Duma - vote for United Russia.
            Right! That’s the calculation! So we can say that the agitators for Starikov, who says, taking the best of the EP, SR, Communist Party, ... pull the balance of votes towards EP, although they blame her! Everything is veiled!
          2. aksakal
            aksakal 24 March 2016 00: 08
            +8
            Quote: There was a mammoth
            It doesn’t bother you that the same person faces the TV controlled by EP, including Starikov. And he speaks beautifully, convincingly!
            Have you heard about PR?

            - He not only speaks, he wrote a bunch of books, read at your leisure, he gives convincing facts in his books, he knows history, well, the same "Sherche la oil!" read. Unfortunately, you have to choose like this, without knowing him personally ... Before 1999, too, few people knew Putin. Shows himself in the Duma as a professional - you can continue to move. If he does not show, he will serve the prescribed term in the Duma and will not be able to be re-elected. It's simple. Give the guy a chance.
            1. Pravdarm
              Pravdarm 24 March 2016 00: 26
              0
              Quote: aksakal
              Everything is simple. Give the guy a chance.
              Nothing! about oil and others. you know how many people spoke real facts and analyzes, beautifully, convincingly and assertively! And what, like giving everyone a chance? And then
              He will not show - he will sit in the Duma in due time
              And if he does not get into the Duma (which is very likely), then the votes "FOR him" will play in favor of the EP! Here is such a hidden arithmetic!

              PS: not the first article of Starikov and, judging by the pluses for the slogans
              Starikov is absolutely right, as always in everything.
              here, on VO - the majority is “For” Starikov!
              I am not campaigning for anyone, I am for nationalization, against privatization! Only Zyuganov clearly says this!
            2. Sober
              Sober 24 March 2016 09: 01
              +1
              Quote: aksakal
              he wrote a bunch of books

              He has been writing a lot for a long time. He writes what he thinks, his opinion does not change. And long before they think it was promoted. Which is, all in the palm of your hand.
              1. The comment was deleted.
            3. sherp2015
              sherp2015 24 March 2016 16: 39
              +1
              Quote: aksakal
              - He not only says, he wrote a bunch of books, read at your leisure,


              Yevtushenko also wrote a bunch of all kinds, and also a bunch of all kinds of Albatzek, and Makarevich is even a musician!
              So, let's elect them somewhere?
          3. sherp2015
            sherp2015 24 March 2016 06: 15
            +2
            Quote: Corporal Valera

            It depends on what program he will have.


            Yes, the program, that would please the people or rub themselves in trust, the authorities can write at least supernational. Another question: what kind of person is this?
            Will he defend the interests of the common people, or the goal is to get into Parliament?
          4. Concept1
            Concept1 24 March 2016 11: 49
            -1
            Will you vote for the Communist Party? I guessed.
        3. nerd.su
          nerd.su 24 March 2016 07: 11
          +1
          Quote: concept1
          Party of singers and athletes club for business interests, party of old outsiders, the party is nothing and the party of tantrums.

          This is called democracy.
        4. Homo
          Homo 24 March 2016 08: 21
          0
          Quote: concept1
          Because in the fall, elections and voting for those who are currently sitting in the Duma makes no sense whatsoever.

          Party of singers and athletes club for business interests, party of old outsiders, the party is nothing and the party of tantrums.

          Let's vote for the unknown (this is not about Starikov), the poor, the hungry! They have a lot to earn! wink
          1. Concept1
            Concept1 24 March 2016 11: 51
            -1
            I understand your sarcasm ..))) What do you suggest ..?
            1. Homo
              Homo 24 March 2016 18: 10
              +1
              Quote: concept1
              I understand your sarcasm ..))) What do you suggest ..?

              Firstly, not YOU but YOU. Secondly, are not singers, athletes, businessmen, pensioners people and citizens of Russia? And in the third, you need to choose according to business, and not by age, status or "sweet" speeches.
              1. Concept1
                Concept1 24 March 2016 21: 18
                0
                My ancestors called you enemies ...)))
      2. A.Anatol
        A.Anatol 23 March 2016 23: 42
        +2
        And before the election, everyone speaks beautifully and fluently!

        Do not be lazy! watch videos of his meetings with readers where he answers the questions of fans of his books by the hour, including talking about the program of the anti-aircraft defense party, in my opinion, since 2010, at least from that time on, I have been familiar with his activities!
        AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IS NOT RIGHT!
        1. Pravdarm
          Pravdarm 23 March 2016 23: 49
          +1
          I looked, I know! I did not emphasize the words "before the elections!"
          And what about Putin ?! he generally says everything correctly for a long time! I mean it! Yes, and Zyuganov, Mironov, for example, did not say anything bad!
          1. EvgNik
            EvgNik 24 March 2016 05: 52
            +9
            Quote: Pravdarm
            Yes, and Zyuganov, Mironov, for example, did not say anything bad!

            Look at them on business, they have long been in the Duma. How they work, what laws they vote for. Mironov sang before the election - where is the nightingale. Well, for whom exactly I won’t vote.
      3. Erg
        Erg 23 March 2016 23: 56
        +13
        What kind of agitation? Nikolai Starikov always adheres to a clear line based on facts and analysis. I advise you to read his books.
        1. Pravdarm
          Pravdarm 24 March 2016 00: 07
          +1
          Yes, many adhere
          a clear line based on facts and analysis.
          Zyuganov, for example, has about 70 books!
          I’m not campaigning, I’m just saying too - this is a fact!
          1. Blondy
            Blondy 24 March 2016 05: 58
            -4
            Quote: Pravdarm
            Zyuganov, for example, has about 70 books!
            I’m not campaigning, I’m just saying too - this is a fact!

            Of course, I apologize, but you are a naive Chukchi young man with your mossy ideas about how politicians write their books nowadays. So that he himself wrote - this is to grandfather Lenin, he had more free time in exile for this.
            Papa Ziu, of course, is a recognized leader, the best, probably, of our rally fighter, ringleader and bawler, but then what? Let us remember that Putin, for example, in his first company, did not speak at the rallies at all, speaking in the spirit that he had plenty of other things to do, and he had no time to present himself more expensively on the panel. This is when, for the second time, the image-makers taught him to bawl. (By the way, it was interesting to watch, sitting on the couch, as he first called on the crowd to chant "we will win").
            They also say that Pope Zu has a smart team, and indeed, it is difficult to imagine Zyuganov at a press conference, so that there are not five assistants sitting nearby. So, can you really choose sic? Assistants will help him. On the other hand, why the heck do we need a puppet president, even if in the hands of the "good guys"? Maybe it's better to directly choose one of these "good" ones - we don't know them, "dark horses" - dad doesn't give them a go.
            1. Pravdarm
              Pravdarm 24 March 2016 09: 04
              +3
              Quote: Blondy
              Of course, I apologize, but you are a naive Chukchi young man with your mossy ideas about how politicians write their books nowadays.
              Of course, I also apologize, but you are also a naive Chukchi girl, because the same can be said about anyone, including Starikov!
              Quote: Blondy
              they say that Papa Sue has an intelligent team, and indeed, it’s hard to imagine Zyuganov at a press conference, so that there are not five assistants sitting next to him.
              And what's wrong with the fact that he has a team of like-minded people and assistants. Is this the party ?!
              If one, that means that he is the Valiant D'Artagnan, or what ??? Maybe this means that there are no like-minded people! Or no one likes him, although he speaks fluently. Both the facts and the analyzes are beautiful. And he wrote a lot of books. Although he may have used the so-called. "ghosts" (who write for him)!
        2. sherp2015
          sherp2015 24 March 2016 16: 40
          0
          Quote: Erg
          Starikov always adheres to a clear line based on facts and analysis.


          He wondered where he got his analyzes.
      4. region58
        region58 24 March 2016 03: 08
        +8
        Quote: Pravdarm
        You can say anything!

        1. region58
          region58 24 March 2016 03: 39
          +1
          Something was buggy, the text was not written. I wanted to say that the main thing is not to be as in the picture.
          1. EvgNik
            EvgNik 24 March 2016 05: 57
            +3
            Quote: region58
            I wanted to say that the main thing is not to be as in the picture

            Yeah, you need to be like this:
            1. weksha50
              weksha50 24 March 2016 10: 14
              +1
              Quote: EvgNik
              Yeah, you need to be like this:



              The average is Chubais ???
      5. saltickov.
        saltickov. 24 March 2016 07: 09
        +1
        not like walking along Gorbachev and Yeltsin, but we set monuments to them.
    2. Corporal Valera
      Corporal Valera 23 March 2016 22: 57
      0
      Quote: concept1
      It is necessary to vote for Starikov in the fall.

      It depends on what program he will have.
      1. Pravdarm
        Pravdarm 23 March 2016 23: 06
        0
        About 5 people are circling with slogans.
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Starikov is absolutely right, as always in everything.

        Quote: flay
        Yeah .. I'm hooked on him now, already the third consecutive book has been read good

        in the first minutes they got a plus.
        Straight really agitprop.
        If someone later reads, of course this will not be seen.
        I am not against Starikov, but nevertheless I would say the country's development program on points, but everything will be the best from the Communist Party, United Russia, Slovak Republic, ...
    3. MREDBEST
      MREDBEST 23 March 2016 23: 39
      +2
      Quote: concept1
      It is necessary to vote for Starikov in the fall.

      Most likely, I will vote for the Communist Party, because their ideas are sympathetic to me, or for Starikov and his Party, Great Fatherland! If only for United Russia, they really relaxed something ...
      1. asiat_61
        asiat_61 24 March 2016 06: 18
        +4
        In general, they didn’t strain, oil was expensive. That's all edro.
      2. simbirzit
        simbirzit 24 March 2016 10: 53
        +3
        about Edross is for sure .... some la la, and the prices in the store are off scale. Correctly Zhirik said, privatize trade and prices will immediately fall by 50%, and then some resellers ....
    4. Koenig
      Koenig 24 March 2016 02: 04
      -1
      I agree completely, I am familiar with his books, very clever. ED is already tired of everyone, the party "what you please" is more like a club of interests, if a thief is from ED, if a traitor and a runner to London, then these specialists feed in SR))
    5. sherp2015
      sherp2015 24 March 2016 06: 06
      -1
      Quote: concept1
      It is necessary to vote for Starikov in the fall.


      Somehow he quickly became both a historian and a songwriter ...
      Who knew him in his youth?
      Eltsin, too, was at first a populist, in city transport he even drove like a mere mortal to please the people, but what did he later turn into?
      1. Chertkov Oleg
        Chertkov Oleg 24 March 2016 06: 24
        +3
        or for Starikov and his Great Patriotic Party! If only not for United Russia, they completely relaxed something ...

        Better or .. I'm For Starikov!
        1. sherp2015
          sherp2015 24 March 2016 16: 43
          0
          Quote: Oleg Chertkov
          Better or .. I'm For Starikov!


          Aha! Who is "for Lenin" and who is "for Stalin"
      2. Sober
        Sober 24 March 2016 09: 08
        -2
        I know about 20 years of his book.
        1. Pravdarm
          Pravdarm 24 March 2016 09: 29
          +3
          Quote: Sober
          I know about 20 years of his book.
          He made his debut as a writer in 2006. The author of 15 books.
          WIKIPEDIA at least take a peek! 20 years ago he was 26 years old.
          In 2002, he participated in the elections to the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg, but lost by gaining 230 votes (0,95% of the number of voters) [9]. At the time of the nomination, he worked as a sales manager for CJSC Europe plus St. Petersburg [10]. Currently, he is the commercial director of the St. Petersburg branch of Channel One.
          1. Sober
            Sober 24 March 2016 11: 17
            0
            Quote: Pravdarm
            WIKIPEDIA at least take a peek!

            I admit my mistakes!
    6. RUSS
      RUSS 24 March 2016 10: 37
      -3
      Quote: concept1
      It is necessary to vote for Starikov in the fall.


      Nikolai Starikov is a modern "writer" of domestic production, an epic ripper of veils, an expert on all questions at once, an adherent of conspiracy theory, which, however, he denies. He has written as many as 15 books on history, political science, economics and geopolitics, although he is not an expert on any issue.
      Starikov works for the public, creating very strange theories that, quite logically, cause uncontrolled emissions of energy in the scientific community.
      He founded the New Great Russia party along with the “founder of the Russian IT industry” Igor Ashmanov. The party program provides for the rejection of a moratorium on the death penalty and the nationalization of the ruble. Her registration was a little stalled, as one more “Russia” was discovered, not so “great”, but not less “new”, but they got out of the situation by renaming themselves the “All-Russian Political Party“ Great Fatherland Party ”, though it’s true that they’re called successfully passed registration, having merged into a warm company of politmursilok on suction (they are also "legally registered parties" in Russia.
      It is worth noting that Starikov is not a historian or economist, but has a diploma of “an engineer-economist of the chemical industry”. That is, his specialty is to understand chemical materials and equipment and their payback. In the global economy, as can be seen from his books, Starikov understands a little less than nothing at all, since even such antiquity as Adam Smith was apparently not taught to him in this specialty.
      Despite the fact that, according to Starikov, Great Britain is the main enemy of all mankind and him personally, and there are also blacks being beaten, his daughter went to England to study for exchange:

      - "My daughter studies in a simple St. Petersburg school with in-depth study of languages. Schoolchildren went to England on an exchange."
      In 2002, he participated in the parliamentary elections in St. Petersburg, at which he scored as many as 0,95% of the vote.
      Suddenly, the main accuser of Anglo-Saxons in the post-Soviet space supported the deployment of the American "logistics center" in Ulyanovsk.

      In 2012, with the help of lawyers, hired for the money collected from fans, he tried to resume the criminal prosecution of Gorbaty. After six months of attorney visits by instances, stifling laughter, the entire court in the person of three judges refused to initiate proceedings.
      Starikov was noticed in a split personality when he led a discussion in LiveJournal immediately on behalf of 5 virtuals, without bothering about their IP addresses.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 24 March 2016 10: 46
      +1
      Experience teaches that weeds do not grow above human height unless specifically watered.

      correctly said smile
  2. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 23 March 2016 21: 50
    +4
    Starikov is absolutely right, as always in everything.
    1. Altona
      Altona 23 March 2016 23: 26
      +8
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Starikov is absolutely right, as always in everything.

      ------------------
      It is a pity that Medvedev despicably betrayed Gaddafi, called him a "handshake face" and all that. We abstained from voting on the notorious UN resolution 1973. I wanted to please the West, iPhone soul.
  3. podgornovea
    podgornovea 23 March 2016 21: 52
    +13
    Asad has no doubles

    Putin too!

    Question No.1 now! Stalin did not leave a successor - get the result!

    Dimon iPhone is not an option.

    Lavrov or Shoigu, that’s the question!
    1. paul-muatdeeb
      paul-muatdeeb 23 March 2016 22: 10
      +2
      Shoigu. He is the only person in the government with an ENGINEERING education. Moreover, he managed to work in his specialty and gain practical experience. This is a completely different brain format.
      1. Pravdarm
        Pravdarm 23 March 2016 22: 21
        +7
        Moreover, he proved himself to be an excellent leader (Commander) and organizer and manager!
        Lavrov - Great diplomat!
  4. flay
    flay 23 March 2016 22: 00
    +13
    Just finished reading his book Geopolitics: How It Is Done
    << And then the actions of the Russian leadership immediately became clear and logical. >> yes
    In my opinion, the man understands what he writes in the book.
    Properly confirms everything with facts, not fabrications.
    The article is in the same perspective. Plusanul
    Z.Y. The lyrics are of course, but whoever has not read the book, read that you will not regret it.
    1. Concept1
      Concept1 23 March 2016 22: 03
      +1
      He has all the books in this style ..
      1. flay
        flay 23 March 2016 22: 14
        0
        Yeah .. I'm hooked on him now, already the third consecutive book has been read good
        1. Corporal Valera
          Corporal Valera 23 March 2016 23: 07
          -4
          Particularly impressive are the moments when he compensates for the lack of facts with his exuberant imagination. You read, it’s kind of like a historical book, and then, bang, and immediately the fantasy went. But so, like, a normal man.
        2. Galich Kos
          Galich Kos 23 March 2016 23: 11
          0
          I seem too hooked. He began to read the second book immediately after the first, without a break.
        3. Galich Kos
          Galich Kos 23 March 2016 23: 11
          +1
          I seem too hooked. He began to read the second book immediately after the first, without a break.
    2. simbirzit
      simbirzit 24 March 2016 11: 01
      +1
      read more Alexander Dugin ... very smart and deep research.
    3. sherp2015
      sherp2015 24 March 2016 16: 47
      0
      Quote: flay
      Just finished reading his book. Geopolitics: How It's Done.
      << And then the actions of the Russian leadership immediately became clear and logical. >>
      In my opinion, the man understands what he writes in the book.
      Properly confirms everything with facts, not fabrications.


      I think that in the Kremlin they prepared both facts and the little book itself.
      Apparently he’s someone’s creature ...
  5. atamankko
    atamankko 23 March 2016 22: 04
    +7
    The Syrian President is a fighter for the freedom of his people and state.
  6. Lumumba
    Lumumba 23 March 2016 22: 05
    +6
    A hypothetical successor must possess the following qualities:
    - Crystal clear, unsullied reputation. Moreover, not only his (successor) family, but also his closest associates, friends, close relatives. Such a person should not have any, even indirect participation in one-day firms, dubious enterprises and business. From the word at all.
    - Suitable, not too big age (I will explain why below).
    - A person must establish himself earlier. Something worthy.

    With all due respect to comrade Lavrov, but the man is already aged. Surely dreams of grandchildren, great-grandchildren and a quiet old age. I apologize for the hackneyed expression, but I am afraid the country will not stand the next "race on carriages". The presidency is a huge responsibility and a huge burden.

    Shoigu is a dark horse. His previous deeds are worthy of respect. A man at one time created from scratch the Ministry of Emergency Situations, which to this day is engaged in real affairs. Then, the Ministry of Defense was worthily received. Yes, perhaps it will also worthily accept the country. But will we like militarism?

    In my opinion, a successor is not yet visible and on the horizon, Shoigu may be a "fallback" and when the time comes, the successor will be shown to us. This event is expected not earlier than 2017.
    1. flay
      flay 23 March 2016 22: 20
      0
      Quote: Lumumba
      This event is expected no earlier than 2017.


      You HAVE VERY MUCH HURRY ...
      Take your time, or you WILL SUCCESS wink

      hi but + drew
    2. aksakal
      aksakal 24 March 2016 00: 20
      +5
      Quote: Lumumba
      Shoigu is a dark horse. His previous deeds are worthy of respect. A man at one time created from scratch the Ministry of Emergency Situations, which to this day is engaged in real affairs. Then, the Ministry of Defense was worthily received. Yes, perhaps it will also worthily accept the country. But will we like militarism?

      In my opinion, a successor is not yet visible and on the horizon, Shoigu may be a "fallback" and when the time comes, the successor will be shown to us. This event is expected not earlier than 2017.

      - Shoigu - a horse all over the world. And he is not a militarist, but simply a good manager and organizer.
      Here is Dumin - that dark horse. And there it smacks of militarism. He is not twice acting as the governor of the Tula (if I am not mistaken) region appointed. Pure warrior, commandos, planned the Crimean operation and the rescue of Yanukovych. Appointed in Tula, that would have been trained not only to plan special military operations, but also economic activity. If he shows himself to be a good business executive, he could very well jump out of the snuffbox like hell, as Putin himself had jumped out at one time. Googling about him. This is the dark horse with a military bias. And you Shoigu yes Shoigu! Shoigu is white and fluffy next to this Dyumin. The West, dreaming of picking up Putin, having received in return for Dyumin, will pray for Putin's return. Fools, they don’t understand that Russia has already taken such a path that Putin is simply the mildest option for the West. All the rest is much worse for the West, and there will definitely not be any pro-Western leaders after Gorbachev and Yeltsin - they are full of them in Russia.
    3. Yugan Oleg
      Yugan Oleg 24 March 2016 00: 28
      -4
      Shoigu is not a professional military man. What kind of militarization? And if he led the Ministry of Emergency Situations, you would announce that we all have emergency situations :) It’s ridiculous.
      I will not support Shoigu's candidacy, the same oligarchs and a Western-oriented business. The existing system with a strong Soul, you need NEW fresh blood, not to be confused with the revolution.
    4. weksha50
      weksha50 24 March 2016 11: 25
      +2
      Quote: Lumumba
      Shoigu is a dark horse. His previous deeds are worthy of respect ... Yes, perhaps the country will also be worthily accepted. But will we like militarism?


      I agree with your comment, however ... However, it is difficult to call Shoigu a "militarist hawk" ...
      He is most likely a good manager (not a business executive !!!) ... He really implements the "party and government" policy ...

      He practically never showed his alleged "hawkish militarism" in anything ... He cares about the rearmament of the RF Armed Forces and cheats the troops with exercises and sudden inspections - this just proves the fact that he is IN HIS PLACE ...

      And the fighting, as you know, is planned and led not by the Defense Ministry, but by the General Staff ...
      In the event of hostilities, the post of the Moscow Region is abolished, there is the Commander-in-Chief and the General Staff ...

      But in general, my personal opinion is that neither Lavrov nor Shoigu are suitable for the role of successors to the government ... They are members of the team, I emphasize that they are good, worthy members of this team ...
  7. Trophxnumx
    Trophxnumx 23 March 2016 22: 06
    +2
    Good article...
  8. raiart
    raiart 23 March 2016 22: 43
    -1
    He also decided to vote for Starikov.
  9. Starik72
    Starik72 23 March 2016 22: 46
    -1
    The article is written in a very good and intelligible language, even for oakheads! Many thanks to the authors!
  10. hard rock
    hard rock 23 March 2016 22: 48
    -23%
    Quote: Nikolai Starikov, Alexey Peskov
    After all, the main task of Russia is to stop the process of destruction of states and chaotization of the Middle East

    Really? And what does Russia want to achieve with this? Low oil prices? Stopping the flow of refugees to Europe? And what for does she need it?
    Quote: Nikolai Starikov, Alexey Peskov
    Ultimately, we must strive to prevent the aggression of terrorist organizations created by the Americans against Russia through Afghanistan and other countries.

    The delirium of crazy people sometimes looks more logical.
    Quote: Nikolai Starikov, Alexey Peskov
    Russia has a serious arsenal of nuclear weapons, which in theory is a guarantee of non-aggression against us by any other state.

    Mistake Not every state. Because it is not against any state that nuclear weapons can be used.
    Quote: Nikolai Starikov, Alexey Peskov
    Here is the keyword "state"

    The key word here is "any".
    Quote: Nikolai Starikov, Alexey Peskov
    and hundreds of thousands of militants of some unrecognized structure cross borders and try to invade our territory?

    And if the Earth hits the celestial axis?
    Where from? What territory? From Mars to balloons? On the Black Sea on air mattresses? Dudes are already nonsense. These are no longer terrorists, this is an act of aggression by a foreign state.
    Quote: Nikolai Starikov, Alexey Peskov
    Obviously, from a legal point of view, this is impossible - after all, the neighboring state did not declare war on us, moreover, in fact, it itself is a victim of the same terrorist groups. Thus, our “partners” are leading the armed confrontation to the area where the presence of nuclear weapons will no longer play any role.

    I would like to advise the dudes to use their sleeves and blow green snot out of their heads. Straight through the nose.
    Quote: Nikolai Starikov, Alexey Peskov
    Just the situation in which the possession of nuclear weapons does not help us in any way.

    Why? Headwinds, racquets will not reach?
    I just looked at the globe of Tajikistan. Nifiga did not find a common border with the Russian Federation. So dudes can relax and move on to dessert.
    Quote: Nikolai Starikov, Alexey Peskov
    Without our permission, as they used to say, not a single gun in Europe fired. Then we got to the point where the "guns didn’t shoot" already on a global scale.

    These tales could even be funny. If they were not so sad.
    I want to remind the "great and terrible" so-called. Caribbean crisis. And Japan's unilateral withdrawal from the regime of unconditional surrender to the USSR, which passed with impunity for it, is also very indicative. And the kidos of China at one time can also be remembered.
    Nonsense, in short, not an article.
    1. Concept1
      Concept1 23 March 2016 22: 54
      +17
      Just leave it here ..
    2. V.ic
      V.ic 23 March 2016 23: 28
      +12
      Quote: hardrock
      The delirium of crazy people sometimes looks more logical.

      Is "America forever" the top of your mind?
      Quote: hardrock
      Mistake Not every state. Because it is not against any state that nuclear weapons can be used.

      Watch an interview with Soviet journalists with Maggie Thatcher, maybe your brains will snap into place.
      Quote: hardrock
      And if the Earth hits the celestial axis?

      You do not have enough brains, so you are trying to borrow from Mikhail Afanasyevich ... At least they pointed to the source, you are "not ours" without pardon.
      Quote: hardrock
      I just looked at the globe of Tajikistan.

      Timur Sultanovich Shaov has a song "Do not smoke grass", so this is for you, download, listen, try to understand.
      Quote: hardrock
      Japan's one-way exit from the Be regimeszagitating surrender to the USSR

      ...withoutconspiracyfull-time surrender is cool! Without a conspiracy / witchcraft / just took, and went out? Ah yes samurai, with..c-partners of mattresses ...
      1. hard rock
        hard rock 23 March 2016 23: 49
        -14%
        Quote: V.ic
        Is "America forever" the top of your mind?

        Really? And in appearance, yours.
        Quote: V.ic
        maybe your brains will snap into place.

        They are always in place. And with yours everything is very bad. Hopeless case.
        Quote: V.ic
        Not enough of your brains, so trying to borrow from Mikhail Afanasevich ...

        I don’t need to borrow anything from Mikhail Afanasevich. Its enough. And you are useless. He probably doesn’t have enough for 2.
        Quote: V.ic
        At least they pointed to the source, you are not “ours”.

        The source of what? Heavenly axis? Bulgakov. Yeah, he is the most.
        Quote: V.ic
        "Don't smoke grass" is for you, download, listen, try to understand.

        Do not attribute your addictions to everyone around you. No, I understand that this is accepted in the circle of alcoholics and "herbal" junkies. But these are not my problems.
        Quote: V.ic
        that's cool!

        Well done, big-eyed. I will now call you not something like "Pig's Snout", but respectfully, something like "Hawkeye".
    3. Dart2027
      Dart2027 23 March 2016 23: 31
      +11
      Quote: hardrock
      And what does Russia want to achieve with this?
      Destroying terrorists away from their borders. By the way, the article explicitly says this.
      Quote: hardrock
      Delirium of crazy people sometimes looks more logical
      Well, if you are a fan of Bender, then yes.
      Quote: hardrock
      not against any state can use nuclear weapons
      What is this "not everyone"?
      Quote: hardrock
      These are no longer terrorists, this is an act of aggression by a foreign state
      Daesh - this is the aggression of a foreign state. USA. By the way, the Maidan is also an act of aggression and the aggressor is the same.
      Quote: hardrock
      I just looked at the globe of Tajikistan
      And there they would not have stayed. If they were allowed to go there.
      Quote: hardrock
      I want to remind the "great and terrible" so-called. Caribbean crisis
      When the whole world was trembling with fear.
      1. hard rock
        hard rock 24 March 2016 00: 02
        -13%
        Quote: Dart2027
        Destroying terrorists away from their borders

        You do not litter agitation. We must first observe our interests.
        Quote: Dart2027
        Well, if you are a fan of Bender, then yes.

        And where does Bandera? Just love to distort just in case?
        Quote: Dart2027
        What is this "not everyone"?

        Use your brains. And try to do without an explosive bullet.
        Quote: Dart2027
        Daesh - this is the aggression of a foreign state. USA. By the way, the Maidan is also an act of aggression and the aggressor is the same.

        Is there such a mess right in your head? Or do you just not know how to clearly express your thoughts?
        Quote: Dart2027
        And there they would not have stayed. If they were allowed to go there.

        And if my grandmother had ... No need to run ahead of the engine. It is fraught.
        Quote: Dart2027
        When the whole world was trembling with fear.

        Funny you are in your children's horror stories. No seriously. Yet in adulthood, people usually already know how to analyze events and facts. And make simple logical conclusions. And if they live in a world of illusions, this is not a good symptom.
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain 24 March 2016 00: 19
      +15
      Quote: hardrock
      Really? And what does Russia want to achieve with this?

      What Russia wanted she already achieved.
      Quote: hardrock
      The delirium of crazy people sometimes looks more logical.

      Judging by your logical comment, you are definitely talking crazy nonsense request
      Quote: hardrock
      Mistake Not every state. Because it is not against any state that nuclear weapons can be used

      What are you, who is this not so touched here? Notably the owner caved in. lol
      Quote: hardrock
      I would like to advise the dudes to use their sleeves and blow green snot out of their heads. Straight through the nose.

      Well, you’re surely blowing your head through your nose.
      Quote: hardrock
      I just looked at the globe of Tajikistan.

      Damn, did you happen to come across the globe of Ukraine? fellow
      Quote: hardrock
      These tales could even be funny. If they were not so sad.

      I agree with you, for Ukraine it can be very sad crying
      Quote: hardrock
      They are always there

      Brains? In place? request
      Quote: hardrock
      no, I understand that this is the way it is in the circle of alcoholics and "herbal" junkies.

      Well, you have a cool party, keep up the good work good
      1. hard rock
        hard rock 24 March 2016 00: 43
        -11%
        Quote: vovanpain
        What Russia wanted she already achieved.

        Yes? Those. will the oil price fall? To the joy of the population of Russia? Have you even tried to guess what this is about? Or is it beyond your mental capabilities?
        Quote: vovanpain
        Judging by your logical comment, you are definitely talking crazy nonsense

        I understood your principle. Just to blurt out.
        Quote: vovanpain
        But what are you, who is we who are not so touched?

        Such "quick-witted users" amaze me.
        Quote: vovanpain
        Well, you’re surely blowing your head through your nose.

        Well, this again, just to blurt out. Call a doctor. Perdelny.
        Quote: vovanpain
        Damn, did you happen to come across the globe of Ukraine?

        Have I written to you about the fake doctor? I wrote. So do not hesitate.
        Quote: vovanpain
        I agree with you, for Ukraine it can be very sad

        What is there and how for Ukraine I am deeply FSU. If you feel sad about this, then kill yourself against the wall.
        Quote: vovanpain
        Brains? In place?

        Are you missing? My condolences.
        Quote: vovanpain
        Well, you have a cool party, keep up the good work

        Thanks for permission. If they ask, I will refer to you, like you allowed.
    5. flay
      flay 24 March 2016 00: 24
      +8
      hardrock- fool

      Nonsense is what you set out ...ФSHO
      Well, this (nonsense) liked the most
      I want to remind the "great and terrible" so-called. Caribbean crisis. And Japan's unilateral withdrawal from the regime of unconditional surrender to the USSR, which passed with impunity for it, is also very indicative. And the kidos of China at one time can also be remembered.

      I understand everything ... but when people. with BROKEN BRAIN is trying to convey something, terribly misinterpreting and distorting the situation of past events ... it’s just Pity.

      Laughter he disassembles when the same person distance himself from the events indicated by him,
      as if his "404 zone" was not then part of the Union. Yes, and the Union was not ruled by their fosterlings - "Cartilaginous"

      Go to your state and chew cookies,SILENT .. only decide on the country
      toli 404, toli 5 republic

      1. hard rock
        hard rock 24 March 2016 00: 32
        -12%
        Quote: flay
        I understand everything ... but when people. with BROKEN BRAIN is trying to convey something, terribly distorting and distorting the situationality of past events ... he is simply PITUAL.

        What kind of hysterics came running here? What are you not happy with? Did you not like the flag? W-pusi, you are my little one. Choose any, there are many of them.
        Or has life failed? Do you take it once a month not childishly? But this is not for me, this is for the doctor.
        And one more thing. Use gaskets. And then the smell ...
        1. Victor-M
          Victor-M 24 March 2016 00: 50
          +6
          Quote: hardrock
          And one more thing. Use gaskets. And then the smell ...

          You rather need to wash it yourself.
          1. hardrokc
            hardrokc 24 March 2016 02: 42
            -2
            Quote: Victor-M
            You rather need to wash it yourself.

            And something else illiterate and hysterical came running. What is it that he did not understand. But then something habitually blurted out.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. vlad66
          vlad66 24 March 2016 00: 59
          +9
          Quote: hardrock
          And one more thing. Use gaskets. And then the smell ...

          And you didn’t forget to put the pads, it stinks of you like a garbage can.
          1. hardrokc
            hardrokc 24 March 2016 02: 45
            -1
            Quote: vlad66
            And you didn’t forget to put the pads, it stinks from you like a garbage can

            And another illiterate hysterical woman caught up.
            She, too, is not in the know about what it is about. But his 5 copecks must be inserted.
  11. Concept1
    Concept1 23 March 2016 22: 57
    +1
    Just leave it here
    1. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 24 March 2016 10: 49
      +1
      Quote: concept1
      Just leave it here


      really resembles a tiger shark, passing by smile
  12. Gunther
    Gunther 23 March 2016 23: 47
    +2
    After all, the main task of Russia is
    termination of the destruction of states and
    randomization of the Middle East

    The main task of Russia is the protection of its interests.
    Light wedge on B. Asad did not converge, will suit anyone who is well related to Russia.
    And if the Russian Federation
    It’s not the state that attacks, but hundreds of thousands of militants of some unrecognized structure who are crossing borders and trying to invade our territory?

    Will they materialize right at the border?
    Let me remind the author about the situation in Ukraine and her reaction to the "vacationers".
    .... about the possibility of using nuclear weapons in a similar situation. Obviously, from a legal point of view, this is impossible ....

    There is nothing impossible in defending the homeland, and you can consult with Israel on legal issues.
    I mean the countries of Central Asia.

    It is necessary to introduce a visa regime, with today's mess in the migration service we are not 18, but 118
    terrorists from Turkey will get into the lungs.
  13. vladcotic
    vladcotic 24 March 2016 00: 02
    -7
    The old man is a typical talker and demagogue, he is our enemy, and a smart enemy. In a moment of danger, such people will stab us in the back. And so it is very dangerous. And what he writes is his personal opinion, everyone can carry any nonsense that he can. And you do not need to believe all of these about power supporters. Instead of talking, it’s better to go to the construction of the Kerch bridge. At least some benefit will be.
    1. Dbnz
      Dbnz 24 March 2016 09: 33
      +1
      Respected! I understand that you are the builder of the Kerch bridge?
  14. Blondy
    Blondy 24 March 2016 00: 38
    +4
    Even in religious literature, besides, "do not judge, but you will be not tried," it is said "judge by deeds." So, if on business, I would, except for Kuzhugetich, hell would vote for whom. There is even tension with the "appointed" successor: the EBN, which we disliked at one time, pointed to the GDP, but the respected GDP - to the LADY who screwed up so many times at the top post, starting with a single hour of the Victory Day Celebration for old veterans (synchronized, under yourself loved) in a country with 11 (or how many have already done to Moscow "closer") time zones, and ending with the drain of Gaddafi, not to mention the days to make a decision during the aggression 08.08.08.
  15. Warrior2015
    Warrior2015 24 March 2016 01: 11
    +2
    Quote: Gunter
    Light wedge on B. Asad did not converge, will suit anyone who is well related to Russia.

    The problem is that in Syria there is NO one else who ACTively supports Russia, would be our ally REALLY - we are on the one hand the unequivocal support of one ethno-confessional group (Syrian Shiites), and on the other - just lack of support at the beginning of their civil war, - led to a strategic impasse, but from which there is one way out - to support Bashar to the end!

    His departure will mean - firstly, the split of the country and apparently its division into 2-4 states, and secondly, will mean the collapse of all Russia's efforts to consolidate its geopolitical positions in this region.
  16. epsilon571
    epsilon571 24 March 2016 01: 15
    0
    The President's successor must be a person with socialist convictions. Old people are suitable for this in all respects, but much will depend not only on him, but also on the upcoming elections to the State. Duma. To win, you need a parliamentary majority, which today is pro-liberal, and therefore anti-people.

    I have been following Starikov's works for a long time, and his statement about the future of the country and the events in Syria looks quite convincing to me. Half-hearted solutions are not profitable today, in this he is right. Like it or not, Russia needs to create conditions for consolidating its success, otherwise the "poisoned locust" will end up near our borders. I also agree that the life of President Assad is of key importance. If this is not an easy ambition, then we cannot repeat the Libyan mistakes.

    The world is changing before our eyes and a lot is unknown, but we will gorge on good things and wait for changes. The war is not over, but the one who deserves it will win!
  17. Gavril
    Gavril 24 March 2016 05: 15
    0
    The peasants of the babaev were captivated that our helicopter TOU knocked out !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1. asiat_61
      asiat_61 24 March 2016 06: 42
      0
      Vidio is very interesting.
  18. Capricorn
    Capricorn 24 March 2016 10: 03
    0
    I respect Starikov.
  19. weksha50
    weksha50 24 March 2016 10: 06
    +1
    "weeds do not grow taller than human growth, unless they are specially watered" ...

    And if weeding in time, then a positive result will be simply amazing ...

    In weeding, our aerospace forces helped Assad ... But the "coalition" is adding water ...
  20. individual
    individual 24 March 2016 13: 22
    0
    Hm!
    No one knows how this will all end, but undoubtedly Bashar Assad, like Solvador Allende, are patriots of their homeland.
    Unlike our Slavic brothers in Eastern and not quite Europe!
  21. Starik72
    Starik72 25 March 2016 21: 39
    0
    Quote: Starik72
    The article is written in a very good and intelligible language, even for oakheads! Many thanks to the authors!

    I look, oakheads are minus me, it means penetrated.