"Donetsk Nemtsov" ready to step on the bridge

15
"Donetsk Nemtsov" ready to step on the bridge


Believe it or not, I will tell you, dear readers, fascinating history. In principle, there is nothing unusual in it, the story tells about the most common Internet warrior, that is, a blogger. Which is clearly destined, as in the aforementioned political figure. But first things first.

There is a phenomenon in the Donbas and on the Internet, like Dima Dzygovbrodsky. Or, in short, Dadzy. He writes a lot and very pathetic. For that, in fact, some politicians like the Gubarev couple value him. And obviously well fed. Just because Daza doesn't feed without top dressing. Well, the person is not able.

Although it should be noted that he tried. Whole two weeks. Dima joined the Ghost Brigade and spent the past two weeks there. Honestly carried guard duty and stood at checkpoints. Claims to him was not. Dadsa had claims to the "Ghost." When it came to Dima that it was necessary not to pay for service, but because it was necessary, for food and respect, Dima from “The Ghost” very quickly faded. Because he earned a lot more respect on the Internet by publishing photos from positions and videos, where some masked guys told me how good Dima is.

In general, there was no military fate. So, at least, I was told by my friends from Ghost, with whom I still communicate. And so they know better. Well, that generally remembered.

On the Internet, too, not everything was smooth and smooth. And Dima left, wiping out all that was possible from his pages, and broadcast with anguish that his legs would not be in social networks anymore. But back. Moreover, he recently became a party to the scandal, when he was caught by the hand on the “left” account in LiveJournal, from where he wrote, let's say, not quite biased things. Kindle, for short.

But Carlson returned and continued his difficult path blogger. But since it is difficult to change a person’s style, the essence of Dadzy’s masterpieces has not changed from the word at all. And the main style of Dima is a lie. Pathetic, beautifully presented, but a lie.

As an example, I will give Dima an oath. Thanks to her, he raised his ratings well and made a noise at all. Many liked it. Today, the author carefully removed from wherever it was possible. But ... there are people who have carefully and carefully preserved it. I beg.



Liked? Me too. Very pathetic and beautiful. Able, devil. That's just if you carefully look at what he fulfilled from his oath, then it becomes clear that nothing. Unless, of course, count weapons in his hands the mouse and keyboard.

Therefore, apparently, the author deleted the movie. And such rollers Dima made a wagon with a small truck. It makes no sense to bring them all without much need, everywhere the same rubbish and lies.

Overall, not a bad guy. That's just lying a lot and loves money. "Well, and who does not love them," as the hero of the novel, so beloved Dima Bulgakov, said.

But today it will be about the affairs of the present day. Today, Dima got up to fight the Ukrainian fascists and maydauns ... represented by Hodakovsky. That is, who is the main enemy of the DNI. The main fascist and maydaun. Yes, LiveJournal allows the use of virtually any vocabulary, so Dima does not hesitate.

Briefly. Personal.

Yes, Nikolai Leonov is a pity, just like hundreds of other guys who gave their lives for the freedom and independence of Donbass. But why, apart from indiscriminate accusations, nothing more? As a reading person, I personally did not understand, Khodakovsky himself was lying behind the machine gun or sent his people to shoot KamAZ? Where is the specifics? And why so much hatred? Two years saving up what?

By the way, two years ago, when the tragedy was mentioned, Dima was not so eloquent. Excuse me

Nikolay Leonov: War picks up the best

Notice the difference?

2014: Kiev punitive killed a bright and brave man in Donetsk. Nikolay Leonov.

2016: Nikolay Leonov. 26 was killed on Monday 2014 on Monday while leaving the Iskra group on the Putilov Bridge in KamAZ, and the group opened heavy fire. 30 May. And Khodakovsky is to blame.

What was required, two years of intense investigation or was it an order? With prepayment? I think the second. Especially as in 2014, Dima couldn't even find the words, oddly enough, for a departed comrade. Reping what was said to others. Busy, he was somewhat different things, rode in the Crimea at meetings with flags. It was both safer and more interesting.

What is the essence of everything? In the fact that I want to bring Dima to clean water? Not. He is still a blogger with all the consequences. Fame in social networks is good, but the blogger, as it were, is not responsible for everything he writes. Especially in the DNI. Especially if he writes something, let's say, to people at the top of the food chain. So let others judge the purity of thoughts and the essence of what Dima wrote.

The fact is that in some circles of Donetsk there was information that Dima could be additionally ... walked across the bridge. Moreover, in people who "shared" such rumors, I am very confident. For they are just from that opera, which comes up with rumors first, then spreads, and then realizes. Like the Ukrainian DRG, elusive and merciless. For the elite.

The fact that Dzygovbrodsky is absolutely uninteresting to the Ukrainian DRG as a target is understandable. But they can walk along the bridge of this talker, if only because, firstly, no one really needs it, and secondly, it has recently been devoted to the fight against Hodakovsky. To wheeze.

Accordingly, in the case of what (and the case of what is known, how can they arrange with the example of Brain and Dremov), who will be blamed? That's right, Khodakovsky. Moreover, the sources almost openly say that Khodakovsky was put in charge of the “possible” murder of Dadza. It is clear that even staying somewhere on Lake Baikal at the time “in case of something” will not provide an alibi.

In general, I am a little sorry for both the defendants of this material. Dima's fault is that he has proven himself to be a complete lie, this exchange for a Skiff-type figure is a sacred cause. But by God, whatever the empty man Dzygovbrodsky was, this is not a reason to mold Nemtsov from him. Although he himself is trying well in this field. Soon it will be possible to evaluate the harvest.

Khodakovsky ... more difficult with him. All his fault is that a good man (even if there is no such position anywhere) and an officer could not become a good politician, did not have enough cynicism and arrogance. And if such a decision is made at the highest levels, I am sure that they will remove Skif from the political arena of Donbass at any cost.

Perhaps, by “numbing” a blogger-loser.

But not the same price. Not Somalia or Sudan after all ...
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +12
      23 March 2016 11: 17
      The same problem, I read and did not understand why I was reading it. I thought about the meaning of the article was about to appear ... and he appeared: Dzygovbrodsky uttered all sorts of nonsense, schatz zattsal for his own skin and posted this text on the site. Allegedly, watch Khodakovsky, if something happens to me, then everyone will think about you ... Balabol-stsykun is more like that.
      1. +4
        23 March 2016 11: 35
        I agree with you! What was it and why is it here ??? There are a lot of such "figures" everywhere ... nonsense and nonsense! negative negative negative
        1. 0
          23 March 2016 17: 24
          It seems that they are settling scores. Unknown author with no less unknown bolger. Someone owes something to someone or is naughty. Dirty little business, smells not of cologne.
    2. +10
      23 March 2016 11: 21
      Quote: Zeppelin ml.
      One question: why is this garbage about an unknown and interesting blogger in VO?

      Now, thanks to the author of the article, everyone at VO learned about its existence.
      1. +7
        23 March 2016 11: 27
        Quote: Tim Coconuts
        Now, thanks to the author of the article, everyone at VO learned about its existence.

        PR guru laughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        23 March 2016 11: 32
        Now, thanks to the author of the article, everyone at VO learned about its existence.


        This is more necessary and serious information ... to everyone to keep an eye out.



        http://warfiles.ru/show-112632-turciya-napravila-v-rossiyu-16-smertnic-dlya-sove
        rsheniya-teraktov.html
    3. +5
      23 March 2016 11: 39
      And didn’t Dzgovbrodsky review the map of military operations in Novorossia? If so, these were the best comments.
      I don’t understand one thing, what personal interest does the author have in the fate of Khodakovsky? Are you going to judge him? And he didn’t seem to be a hero. Quite muddy and conflicting stories.
      1. Mobius
        +1
        23 March 2016 11: 49
        Quote: siberalt
        I don’t understand one thing, what personal interest does the author have in the fate of Khodakovsky?


        Moreover, traced from article to article ... It happens that for some remuneration, depending on the "promotion" of a journalist, he undertakes to lobby for one or another party, movement, and the like.
        They bark in the direction they pointed ...
        1. +1
          23 March 2016 23: 36
          And there is another thing - the conscience of the author is not indifferent to the fate of the region, where at present any manifestation of public activity is suppressed, except for the movement of the Donetsk Republic
      2. +1
        23 March 2016 11: 50
        Quote: siberalt
        And didn’t Dzgovbrodsky review the map of military operations in Novorossia?

        no there was Andrey "Basketok" - now he seems to be trying himself as a journalist somewhere in the DPR
        I think you are about him
      3. +9
        23 March 2016 12: 21
        Kh.Z., that there is Skomorokhov against Dzygovbrodsky personally, there is nothing special in his writings, he is often published on "Anti-Fascist", there are quite sensible things. Maybe in LJ itself there is something offensive for Roman, but VO is not a place for clarifying personal relationships, KMK.
        1. +1
          23 March 2016 23: 38
          Nothing special but lies for money and lies
      4. +1
        23 March 2016 23: 33
        At the expense of whether he is considered a hero - a moot point
    4. +4
      23 March 2016 12: 27
      One question: why is this garbage about an unknown and interesting blogger in VO?
      --------------------------------------------
      Think about it yourself. A person spreads 2-3 articles a day tirelessly.
      Well, it happened that usually happens, the writer has written up. No offense will be said.
      Cheslov, before becoming familiar that I no longer read his opuses.
      1. Mobius
        +4
        23 March 2016 12: 32
        Quote: guzik007
        Think about it yourself. A person spreads 2-3 articles a day tirelessly.


        Actually, fertility is like that of Daria Dontsova ... Not by quality, but by quantity.
      2. +4
        23 March 2016 13: 30
        Quote: guzik007
        Well, it happened that usually happens, the writer wrote

        crisis of the genre, yes.
        And here we are a-a-a-phonically interested in what they have there in the literary circle of a new one.
        1. The comment was deleted.
    5. +1
      23 March 2016 15: 33
      let's write about each noname now.
      compare some useless piece ram the opposing blogger and memtsov.
      the last one was even known
    6. +1
      23 March 2016 16: 04
      Quote: Zeppelin ml.
      why in VO this rubbish about an unknown and not interesting blogger?


      So that everyone knows that you can’t contact him under any pretext - he will sell him with giblets. Radish man, and nothing else. It’s only capable of threatening in a personal way on Internet sites, later receiving physiognomy in real life (the case of Gafurov).

      Well, for a snack ... laughing Even svidomye for the idiot consider it: on the site "Peacemaker" the degree of his danger is estimated minimally - "Unprepared". wassat

      1. 0
        23 March 2016 17: 20
        Hmmm .... cat nickname matches LJ? or just a coincidence?
        1. +1
          23 March 2016 19: 18
          Cat nickname here = Kotleopold77 in LJ ... hi So what? bully
          1. 0
            23 March 2016 19: 28
            Well ... you're like a celebrity - I recognized you) hi

            Although I rarely read LJ.
            1. +1
              23 March 2016 21: 07
              Which celebrity am I? feel So-so ... pot-bellied little thing. laughing
  2. +3
    23 March 2016 11: 13
    I really didn’t understand who was pressing anyone. But in your city there are a lot of destroyed brick houses and that, not a single brick falls on the heads of such active bloggers. You don’t need to build bridges either. Just after a brick fall, put up a sign in collapse zone ... "no entry" ...
  3. Mobius
    +6
    23 March 2016 11: 14
    The fact that Dzygovbrodsky is absolutely uninteresting to the Ukrainian DRG as a target is understandable. But they can walk along the bridge of this talker, if only because, firstly, no one really needs it, and secondly, it has recently been devoted to the fight against Hodakovsky. To wheeze.


    The author, well, you allow yourself to wheeze on the side of Khodakovsky and the structures connected with him, but you refuse this to others?

    Not tired of juggling information, and even someone else's, from sources that the reader can’t check?

    Go to Donetsk, see everything with YOUR EYES. And so, based on "insider information", and using certain information (in relation to journalism) technologies, your articles are more like THIS:

    Also, it seems, REALITY ...


    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      23 March 2016 12: 00
      I agree. And the article in general sounds like a threat.
    3. 0
      23 March 2016 18: 00
      This is how much you need to drink, but famously done.
    4. +1
      24 March 2016 00: 00
      I'm in Donetsk now :) I look with my own eyes. Well?
      Khodakovsky and his organization "Patriotic Forces of Donbass" are now under pressure from various sides, and Dzygovbrodsky (aka Dzyga) is on the payroll of those who are trying to pressure ...
      The commission for allegedly investigating something in relation to Khodakovsky, for lack of arguments, does not find crimes behind him and infa leaked from Gubarev's environment (I heard this from several sources) that the employers planned to make Dzyga a sacred victim of the "terrible" Khodakovsky in order to finally with the undesirable commander and a politician to take revenge, making him guilty ... I laughed at this for a long time - where is Khodakovsky, and where is Dzyga, who, compared to Skif, is not even a pug, but a flea on a dog's tail ... but apparently his customers appreciate it very highly, despite mediocre creativity ... and here on V.O. suddenly I meet this info. It turns out that not exactly rumors ... well, they would not make me laugh at least)) About such a city ... as Dzyga, even patriots would not get dirty, and not that an officer of a military special forces ...
  4. +2
    23 March 2016 11: 16
    Well, what is he Donetsk? He is Dnepropetrovsk.
    Maybe that's why the inscription "Israel defeyse forces intelligence" looks so organic on his T-shirt.
    1. +2
      23 March 2016 11: 41
      Quote: Hlavaty
      organically looks on his t-shirt inscription

      On a brand new T-shirt, dressed specifically for shooting!
  5. 0
    23 March 2016 11: 18
    So what? some kind of crap about a completely unknown blogger. What does VO have to do with it?
    1. Mobius
      +2
      23 March 2016 11: 29
      Quote: Abbra
      So what? some kind of crap about a completely unknown blogger. What does VO have to do with it?


      Yes, despite the fact that any, even "smelly", "if only about the LDNR", the information picked up from no one knows what garbage, some like ill-bred dogs, drag to the site.

      On, master, I brought!

      But how loud! DONETSKY GERMTSOV! Ugh, "journalism" ...
      1. 0
        23 March 2016 11: 50
        Quote: Möbius
        like ill-mannered dogs, drag to the site.

        laughing I liked the metaphor.
      2. +4
        23 March 2016 12: 01
        Quote: Möbius
        DONETSKY GERMTSOV! Ugh, "journalism" ...

        yeah, the attitude to Borukh Yefimich is unambiguous, but comparing some UG with him is an author's pearl.
        Skomorokhov shared his personal dislike "I can not eat" to the name - so what? What, in fact, is he expecting a reaction to his libel?
  6. +1
    23 March 2016 11: 20
    This person wants to receive publicity status. These are called narcissism syndrome patients ...
    1. +1
      23 March 2016 12: 16
      Quote: Appraiser
      These are called narcissism syndrome patients ...

      no, narcissism is introverted narcissism. Here is nonsense of greatness laughing
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. -1
      23 March 2016 11: 39
      Quote: Army 2
      In general, I like such "professions" as a blogger ... in the language of piz ... do not move bags.

      clear business. You understand your social position before calluses, at the same time taking the opportunity to open your eyes to the truth to unreasonable hamsters. Well, and let his brother-blogger publicly, by natsediv virtual bile.
      Remuneration issues tactfully omitted.
  8. +1
    23 March 2016 11: 24
    In the course of Dima, the fate of the sacrificial ram awaits. In this direction, and movement! They spit on him for the material, he fulfills the fee, not thinking about the future. The client is not ready yet ...
    1. +3
      23 March 2016 11: 31
      Quote: AlNikolaich
      They spit on him for the material

      Yes, everyone is drooling, including Skomorokhov. A delicate question ... laughing
      1. Mobius
        +1
        23 March 2016 11: 41
        Quote: Zeppelin ml.
        Yes, everyone is drooling, including Skomorokhov. A delicate question ...


        The second oldest ...
        1. +2
          23 March 2016 12: 21
          Quote: Möbius
          The second oldest ...

          but I also borrowed something from the first ...))
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +2
    23 March 2016 11: 39
    Quote: Talker
    He lived and didn’t even know about this Dyzyk, and in fact I’m not even going to find out about him. Whoever is interested in biting small bloggers. Is there nothing more to discuss?

    A vague doubt creeps in, and whether he got out here under a pseudonym, for garbage is all this.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  14. The comment was deleted.
    1. Mobius
      +2
      23 March 2016 12: 36
      Quote: kotvov
      novel, your publications began to resemble OBS. uninteresting and boring.



      And you think easily, every time "suck" out of someone else's information, without owning the details and "knowledge of the area", somethingable to turn into at least a semblance of an article?
      1. -1
        23 March 2016 12: 50
        Quote: Möbius
        Do you think it is easy, every time to "suck" out of someone else's information, without owning the details and "knowledge of the area", something that can turn at least into a kind of article?

        hard and dangerous work. Like a "pupil of a junior scooper in a sewage bag at cholera barracks." (Strugatskys)
        1. Mobius
          -1
          23 March 2016 13: 13
          Quote: Zeppelin ml.
          hard and dangerous work. Like a "pupil of a junior scooper in a sewage bag at cholera barracks." (Strugatskys)


          This metaphor (picture), abruptly my writing will be Yes good
  15. +2
    23 March 2016 13: 04
    Yes, ji is an ordinary blogger, there is nothing infernal in him))) Not so long ago, he got into a fright with a traveler 1 - Vershinin, and several other bloggers who mutually accused each other of all mortal sins and what ?! Why drag these muddy showdowns here?
  16. 0
    23 March 2016 13: 16
    I don’t understand at all - how Khodakovsky remained in power, leadership, after he lured the militias into a trap ...
    Kamaz shot, knew where and when ....
    And who could know everything ?! That's right, who steered everything ....
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      24 March 2016 00: 04
      Maybe because there was no trap and he did not lure anyone there?
  17. +1
    23 March 2016 13: 22
    So what? Can't deal with him? there the war is going on, they drove the tank and valnuli direct fire and wrote off everything to the Ukrainian saboteurs.
    1. Mobius
      0
      23 March 2016 14: 06
      Quote: sergeyzzz
      So what? Can't deal with him? there the war is going on, they drove the tank and valnuli direct fire and wrote off everything to the Ukrainian saboteurs.


      The author clearly pointed out to you at the end of the article:
      Not Somalia or Sudan after all ...
      although in another article about Donetsk, and again at the end of the article, he wrote that Somalia ... request

      Such "mood swings" are either signs of a disease, or depend on which Pegasus will bring inspiration to the author, sober or drunk.
  18. 0
    23 March 2016 13: 32
    What are the sweeping allegations?
    Did not Khodakovsky lead the operation at the airport in Donetsk?
    Shooting bodies, spread over the network, as a result of a "brilliant" operation to what?
    1. +1
      24 March 2016 00: 05
      But didn’t the director Anna News take an interview with Stary? Didn't Boroday bring journalists to the morgue?
  19. +1
    23 March 2016 17: 07
    quite recently became a participant in a scandal when he was caught by the hand on the "left" account in LJ, from where he wrote, let's say, not entirely disingenuous things. Kindle, in short.


    I would like to clarify what kind of left account in LiveJournal the author of the material is talking about, since all the incitement he mentioned DaDzy led from his account.

    Moreover, the it was not some ordinary incitement, but calls for genocide of the civilian population of Ukraine regardless of political preferences, age category, etc. of this population. Moreover appeals posted by Dzygovbrodsky precisely in the entries on his blog on LiveJournal and precisely at the time when he was on the territory of the Russian Federation. So for the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in relation to ... on Dmitry Dzygovbrodsky - an unplowed field of work. Especially when you consider that in the near future Mr. ... Dzygovbrodsky intends to leave the Donbass and enter the territory of Russia.
  20. 0
    23 March 2016 17: 08
    Who cares about this dung? -Description and venality is his motto ..
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. 0
    23 March 2016 17: 47
    Why an article? Probably, then, that historical events can be repeated. Well, I don’t know this character either, but someone knows him well. Let's see how events go further.
    1. 0
      23 March 2016 18: 28
      Quote: Reptiloid
      Why an article? Probably, then, that historical events can be repeated.

      uh ... can you quote that place in the article that set you up for such a philosophical twist? Apparently, this idea could be conveyed, say, by the example of pistils and stamens.
      Quote: Reptiloid
      I also don’t know this character .... Let's see how things go further.
      What events? With this character you don't know? Or even?
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. 0
    24 March 2016 11: 20
    So, what are Dzygovbrodsky's "crimes" or "unreliability"? Or should the mockery alone fill the reader immediately with anger?