The newest American destroyer Zamvolt has reached the final test stage.

100
Largest in stories The US Navy is a destroyer of a new type, Zamvolt, on Monday went to sea for the final tests, reports Expert Online with reference to the Associated Press.



"Engineers and technicians of Bath Iron Works intend to focus on the work of power plants, mobility and safety of the vessel before the acceptance of the US Navy," - said in a statement.

“The commander of the destroyer was extremely impressed with the stability of the ship, especially during tight corners, his navigability during the first test in December,” the agency quoted rear admiral Peter Fanta.

The destroyer is “as automated as possible”, which made it possible to reduce the number of its crew to 150. It is assumed that Zamvolt will take over combat duty in 2017.

The cost of the ship was not less than $ 4,4 billion. This figure forced the Navy to abandon the original plans to build for themselves 32 such destroyers. Given the significant cost overruns, the Zamvolt program was significantly curtailed.

Help edition: "Zamvolt" - the largest destroyer of the American fleet: its length is 183 m, width - 24,6 m, draft - 8,4 m, and displacement - 14,5 thousand tons. It is armed with 20 Mk-57 rocket launchers, two long-range 155-mm guns and 30-mm anti-aircraft guns . To protect against radar, the hull and superstructure of the destroyer are “dressed” in a 3-cm “shirt” made of radio-absorbing materials. ”
  • en.wikipedia.org
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

100 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. AlesanderRomanov
    -25
    22 March 2016 15: 21
    Well, seven feet under the keel !!!
    1. +60
      22 March 2016 15: 24
      Quote: AlesanderRomanov
      seven feet under the keel!!!

      Over the mast, you wanted to say. wink
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +3
          22 March 2016 15: 37
          Quote: Temples
          Of course, lovers of the "beautiful" will begin to minus me.

          But this is my opinion.
          What is there.

          The declared characteristics of this steamboat are not bad, but it is one thing to state, and the other is to prove it during operation!
          1. +11
            22 March 2016 21: 02
            Instruction manual only lost wassat
        2. +2
          22 March 2016 15: 39
          Quote: Temples
          Of course, lovers of the "beautiful" will begin to minus me.

          There is nothing beautiful there, neither aesthetically visually, nor morally (a killing machine for the sake of enriching the clans), nor spiritually (there is nothing beautiful by amers, by definition, they destroyed the indigenous population of both Americas).
        3. +1
          22 March 2016 15: 59
          Quote: Temples
          Tin.
          ........
          It looks like a biscuit.



          I wonder if it will be pulled over the mast with black caviar on the 4,4 yard or not?
          1. 0
            22 March 2016 16: 49
            I wonder if it will be pulled over the mast with black caviar on the 4,4 yard or not?

            At how much sturgeon is needed to get so much porridge?
            After such a catch, the fish will not only disappear here, but Iran will forget about it forever!

            It’s better to fill this ship with shit to the eyeballs!
            For unsinkability!
            Ameri goats love to eat. Feces for the whole series is enough.

            And the sturgeon in the Volga will remain!
            1. Dam
              0
              23 March 2016 01: 49
              So shit, by definition, it is filled from birth. Who is the team?
        4. +1
          22 March 2016 16: 04
          So looked armadillos of the late 19th century. Interestingly, their fantasies are over or everything new is the forgotten old.
        5. +15
          22 March 2016 19: 30
          Quote: Temples
          Tin.

          I understand your sarcasm. But ... mattresses are building ships of the first rank, but we are not yet. They have two more such "irons" on the way, and our bureaucrats are all running around the exhibitions with models of the Leader and the Squall.
          They build aircraft carriers and arsenal ships, and we are patrolmen. And we build frigates on time, like mattresses this very iron.
          You can laugh and laugh, but most of our first-rank ships are still built in the USSR. Remind me how old the flagship of the Moscow Black Sea Fleet is? It will soon be 40 years old! Boreas, for all their need, are still submarines of generation 4+). And mattresses about our fleets have much more reasons to laugh. And soon two more aircraft carriers of the Jeral Ford type are on the way.


          We wouldn’t have to laugh, but think about when the Leader is going to build. Yes, and generally ships of the first rank.
          1. 0
            22 March 2016 21: 06
            Quote: NEXUS
            . But ... mattresses are building ships of the first rank, but we are not yet.

            The ships of the first rank are submarine missile carriers, the surface fleet has an auxiliary function.
      2. 0
        22 March 2016 15: 34
        So this is a changeling! He already walks ... sing to the top!
      3. +15
        22 March 2016 15: 47
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: AlesanderRomanov
        seven feet under the keel!!!

        Over the mast, you wanted to say. wink

        This AlesanderRomanov is not real !!! And I took an avatar from EvgNik!
        Looks like a troll today! Which is constantly banned! Just registered.
        1. +2
          22 March 2016 16: 19
          Quote: Pravdarm
          This AlesanderRomanov is not real !!! And I took an avatar from EvgNik!

          Admins already unsubscribed.
          1. AlesanderRomanov
            -8
            22 March 2016 16: 22
            pounding is not good!
      4. +14
        22 March 2016 15: 55
        Well, I don’t know what was under the keel there, but I want to figure it out cleanly, is it with or without vertical steaming? belay
        1. 0
          22 March 2016 16: 43
          Quote: Major Yurik
          Well, I don’t know what was under the keel there, but I want to figure it out cleanly, is it with or without vertical steaming? belay


          I agree. I think both a steamer and a steamer are available. The thing is generally glamorous. It was not in vain that I asked about caviar: girls, caviar, champagne, well, a complete snowshoe ....
      5. +2
        22 March 2016 16: 12
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Over the mast, you wanted to say.

        This is someone who decided to troll the real Romanov, and declare him a "war of the clones"? Cool - Romanov's avatar! laughing
      6. -1
        22 March 2016 16: 44
        Quote: AlesanderRomanov
        seven feet under the keel!!!
        Over the mast, you wanted to say. wink

        Well, or if we keel the top ...
    2. +3
      22 March 2016 15: 24
      only if he needs 8
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +4
      22 March 2016 15: 25
      And a torpedo on board!
    6. +14
      22 March 2016 15: 31
      The largest in the history of the US Navy destroyer of a new type "Zamvolt" on Monday went to sea

      And at this time, the largest iceberg in the history of the US Navy broke away from a glacier in Greenland ...
      1. 0
        22 March 2016 15: 35
        And at this time, the largest iceberg in the history of the US Navy broke away from a glacier in Greenland ...


        Why is it after the word
        iceberg
        I immediately remembered the TITANIC ... this is not good.
        1. +5
          22 March 2016 15: 45
          This ship is impressive! As well, the price is $ 4,4 billion! Let's look at the course of operation ...
          1. +7
            22 March 2016 20: 13
            Quote: gray smeet
            This ship is impressive! As well, the price is $ 4,4 billion! Let's look at the course of operation ...

            And I personally envy the Yankees with “black” envy.
            I envy the pace they are building their ships and how many!
            And our frigate Gorshkov after the descent was completed for another 10 years. During this time, the Yankees aircraft carrier riveted. Corvettes Serial-declared construction time of 4 years. WHERE TO US ..... such terms.
            It's a shame for the power! We would at least a third of their capabilities in the construction of the fleet.
            Of course, now the arguments will be strewn down, that in our country everything was destroyed in 90, that they are stifling sanctions, etc.
            But 15 years of genosse, 15 years ....! Something could and should have been done, and not stupidly revel: The whole world is in friends and brothers.
            So to criticize and I won’t think about it;
            Tests will show, but envy the amers, I envy them.
            I envy the fact that here they can ALL THIS allow themselves, but we DO NOT! Of course, they are bandits, scammers and ... generally bad.
            But we do not have enough means to “put them in a corner”.
      2. 0
        22 March 2016 20: 13
        Quote: Koldunja
        And at this time, the largest iceberg in the history of the US Navy broke away from a glacier in Greenland ...

        We are waiting for the news: "During sea trials, the USS Zumvolt collided with an iceberg and sank ... The commander and crew of the iceberg were awarded orders and medals ..." laughing laughing laughing
    7. AlesanderRomanov
      -32
      22 March 2016 16: 00
      e slut che beguiled me minus ???
      I’ll bother you with ghouls
      1. +4
        22 March 2016 16: 16
        What bastard misappropriated my avatar and nickname Alexander Romanov? Such immediately in the toilet must be drained.
        1. +5
          22 March 2016 16: 32
          What bastard misappropriated my avatar and nickname Alexander Romanov? Such immediately in the toilet must be drained.


          This is the number wassat and here the fifth column is mimicking under our members of the forum ....

          AUUUU real ALEXANDER ROMANOV take measures against the enemy of the people .... to the wall of the reptile, until he finally spoiled the forum.
          (Damn ... now I myself checked how this can be done ... it turns out to be simpler than a turnip).
          1. +4
            22 March 2016 16: 49
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            take measures to the enemy of the people .... to the wall of the reptile

            Alexey, measures have already been taken, everything is OK.
            1. +1
              22 March 2016 17: 41
              Atomic torpedo in his bochin
            2. +2
              22 March 2016 19: 54
              Quote: EvgNik
              measures have already been taken, everything is OK.

              And I would like to know where this miracle came from, from which country. Although, there are not so many countries with knowledge of Russian. But clarification would not hurt. IP would publish.
      2. +1
        22 March 2016 16: 44
        Yes, we are already looking forward to it.
    8. +1
      22 March 2016 16: 18
      Seven pounds of nails in their mouth!
  2. +4
    22 March 2016 15: 23
    It looks, to put it mildly, futuristic. Let's see how it will swim. The Titanic was also the most - the most.
    1. +5
      22 March 2016 15: 40
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Let's see how it will swim.

      Let's hope what exactly is "float"! Torpedo to his bay!
  3. +8
    22 March 2016 15: 24
    Big trough, big torpedo am
    1. +2
      22 March 2016 15: 41
      Quote: spech
      Big trough, big torpedo

      On the censor we will be called aggressive and this will be the most censored word! At least why not! Who with a sword comes to us from the sword and perishes!
      1. Dam
        0
        23 March 2016 01: 52
        Whoever comes with a sword will get a shout
  4. +2
    22 March 2016 15: 24
    The true test of the ships pass only in a combat situation.
    And so, so as not to drown ...
  5. -5
    22 March 2016 15: 25
    Destroyer "as automated as possible"

    That's good, drone with Khibiny and consider the matter in the hat ... wassat
    1. +5
      22 March 2016 15: 29
      Tell us how Khibiny will affect its automation? This is electronic warfare; the ship cannot be taken under control. And this is not an EMP bomb to knock out electronics.
      1. -11
        22 March 2016 15: 36
        Our "MIG" has already "turned off" the American destroyer in the Black Sea. And 12 times he carried out an imitation of an attack on him. After this, part of the destroyer's crew was asked to sign off. Fact. You can find it in open sources.
        1. WAN
          +1
          22 March 2016 15: 57
          Not MIG, but SU, and he did not turn it off, but Crimean beauty, they discussed so many times ...
          1. +3
            22 March 2016 16: 06
            You are either confused or invented. There was no rubbish there and no one turned off anything
          2. -4
            22 March 2016 16: 12
            Amendment to SU +.
            The rest: http://alvasme.livejournal.com/113330.html
          3. -1
            22 March 2016 16: 48
            And at what distance from the "Crimean krauha" was the destroyer? Why not turn off the White House from Cuba then?
            1. WAN
              0
              22 March 2016 17: 11
              The declared range of the work of krasukha is up to 300 km., Washington in no way to Cuba request unless Guantanamo turn off smile
              1. 0
                22 March 2016 17: 21
                How did it happen that, apart from the destroyer, no one else in a circle with a radius of about 300 km "whined"? Diameter = 600 km.
                Where does such abrupt selectivity and such distrust of the Khibiny come from?
                1. WAN
                  0
                  22 March 2016 17: 50
                  I trust the khibiny, but knocking out all the destroyer's devices with one attack aircraft, albeit with the presence of the khibiny, is fantastic.
                  1. +2
                    22 March 2016 18: 14
                    Do not want to answer a specific question.
                    Well, think, cell jammers do exist.
                    And the army anti-terror device (in terms of dimensions slightly less than R-105) suppresses everything within a radius of 2 km.
                    On the border with the Crimea, there is a lot of Ukrainian, Romanian, Pinosky things. Why didn't they howl? It is impossible to jam one thing, and others not. It is impossible to "aim" precisely at a distant destroyer without affecting other radiation sources.
                    If what you were saying was probably from a racket, then why was a plane needed? Turned off for 300 km and let him swim on his oars.
                    Glitches began when the SS approached the destroyer destruction zone and ended when the SU left the zone.
                    Consequently, the impact was at sea, on the range of the destroyer’s firing range. That surrounding and did not complain. There was no one nearby.
                    1. +3
                      22 March 2016 20: 15
                      There were no glitches on the ship.
                      Glitches were in some acne-burned acne youths. who suddenly invented that the EW self-defense station could suppress the ship's AID.
                      The Khibiny complex, whose task and power is to introduce distortions into the reflected radar signal, or rather to supplement the reflected radar signal), so that the radar processing computer would identify this noise much longer.
                      Not able to extinguish the seeker even such a small missile as AMRAAM, at a distance of 5 km and closer.

                      Learn materiel, smoke manuals, do something else to do self-education. Stop being a pimple youngster under amphetamines ...
    2. +1
      22 March 2016 19: 02
      Tell us about the drone. Its type (serial). Where does it take off and how does it intercept this target in the Atlantic? How does it ensure the transportation of a container weighing 300 kg and how does it provide power for 3600 watts. Who provides cover and target designation? And who will let him fly into the affected area?
  6. -6
    22 March 2016 15: 25
    The biggest, say, well, the Leader is promised to surpass him. So as in the Union, to the largest cruiser and nuclear submarines, we will have the largest destroyer.
    1. +7
      22 March 2016 15: 31
      The layout of the "leader" will not surpass it soon!
  7. +4
    22 March 2016 15: 25
    Didn't they upgrade the Aurora?
  8. +8
    22 March 2016 15: 25
    Quote: AlesanderRomanov
    Well, seven feet under the keel !!!

    can I correct you a little? a seven-foot reef to him under the keel and an anchor in the w ..laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
  9. +2
    22 March 2016 15: 26
    Well, until the tests, then acceptance, then the pier - a museum!
  10. +9
    22 March 2016 15: 29
    Final exit mean? Well, God forbid, God forbid. Let only a place deeper choose.
  11. +3
    22 March 2016 15: 29
    So far, I can’t say anything bad about the price, I’ll see how amers will go on.
  12. 0
    22 March 2016 15: 30
    Nothing personal, but I really want them to be really FINAL! Let the personnel be saved! However, how lucky!
    “Zamvolt is the largest destroyer of the American fleet: its length is 183 m, width - 24,6 m, draft - 8,4 m, and displacement - 14,5 thousand tons. Armed with 20 missile launchers Mk-57, two long-range 155 -mm cannons and 30-mm anti-aircraft guns. To protect against radars, the hull and superstructure of the destroyer are "dressed" in a 3-cm "shirt" made of radio-absorbing materials. "

    AND ONLY ONE "CALIBER" ...
  13. -1
    22 March 2016 15: 30
    The most important thing is to stock up on sugary sailors with diapers so as not to be embarrassed when suddenly we appear on the horizon ...
    1. +1
      22 March 2016 16: 23
      yeah, on the layout of the Leader, with oars in his hands, here they are from laughter and fit
  14. +1
    22 March 2016 15: 30
    After testing "welcome" to the Black Sea, let's look at stealth and at the same time we will experience something.
  15. +1
    22 March 2016 15: 31
    20 launchers, 2 cannons, how many phalanxes are there .... and 14,5 thousand tons ... there are 150 crew members of 150 five-star apartments in a compartment with a bar and a strip club there?
  16. -2
    22 March 2016 15: 33
    We always laugh at them about envy. They really already walk and they only draw on paper and carry a plasticine model for exhibitions.
    1. 0
      22 March 2016 15: 50
      Yes, we don’t need it for $ 4,4 billion!
      Let it swim with them. That's how the state democrats the budget is milked, then a wild plane will fly out, then a huge destroyer will come up, and then money, bye-bye!
      1. +7
        22 March 2016 16: 26
        Quote: Vetal999
        Yes, we don’t need it for $ 4,4 billion

        Quote: Vetal999
        and then money, bye-bye!

        Still print. Especially since 100 mld. Russian dollars work for the US economy.
        And the pace of shipbuilding is truly envy. hi
  17. +4
    22 March 2016 15: 34
    Automatic system say, ok if so. Just the other day, the automatic system refused to make a salvo from the APC, you see the trees she didn’t like, a lot of them turned out. So, which is more careful there, more attentively, there are a lot of things that go around in the okane, and swims as well. And then, as in the saying: Suddenly, war - and you are not a shame ... and.
  18. +2
    22 March 2016 15: 36
    big trough small rocket, like "mosquito" wink
  19. +1
    22 March 2016 15: 42
    Some kind of monster belay
  20. +2
    22 March 2016 15: 44
    I look at this miraculous judo and immediately for some reason I remember the F-117, associations arise.
  21. 0
    22 March 2016 15: 46
    It's funny for you, but the Papuans must be scared already. lol
  22. 0
    22 March 2016 15: 48
    Will Onyx and Caliber be tested?
  23. 0
    22 March 2016 15: 53
    In general, do not care. But the kayak is unusual, no doubt.
  24. +1
    22 March 2016 15: 54
    Heh ... to see how this trough of the storm holds ... well, Khibina to test it.
  25. +3
    22 March 2016 15: 55
    Sofa special forces and here already worked as it should soldier Americans will have to postpone Zamvolt's exit indefinitely laughing
  26. +1
    22 March 2016 16: 05
    Quote: AlesanderRomanov
    Well, seven feet under the keel !!!

    ---------------------
    Seaworthiness is doubtful, the cost is prohibitive. The Pentagon itself already doubts the appropriateness of its brainchild of such a cost. More chips in the crankcase, bugs in the software and other bugs. By the way, in this miracle ship I had to remove the power plant by cutting out a part of the unique hull with a gas-cutting (!!!) and then brewing it back. Wonderful maintainability. I wish more of such products.
    1. +1
      22 March 2016 16: 47
      They didn’t put an oil filter (they forgot) - then they found chips in the oil, so they sorted the power plant ..
      1. +1
        22 March 2016 20: 19
        Quote: Grabber2000
        They didn’t put an oil filter (they forgot) - then they found chips in the oil, so they sorted the power plant ..


        Well, if you do not own the materiel. Why do you write nonsense?

        on another boat the trouble was with shavings. With everything else.
    2. +3
      22 March 2016 17: 56
      Look at its shape - what's the problem
      with seaworthiness?
      1. 0
        22 March 2016 18: 35
        It’s not very clear why they made this form: the same thing, if they wanted to reduce their visibility ... But on the deck they lost, they usually try to do more ...
      2. 0
        22 March 2016 21: 36
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Look at its shape - what's the problem
        with seaworthiness?

        -------------------
        This whole device is one continuous problem, I have already listed. One jamb with maintainability is already enough. I understand that Israel is a very rich country and it is not a question at all to buy several of these destroyers and several dozen F-35s for it. Therefore, such angry comments on criticism of weapons at a price comparable to the "death star" or "eye of Sauron."
  27. +1
    22 March 2016 16: 06
    The computer is floating! But on linux! The concept is new, unusual ... Kaptsov says that only Cadillac Elvis Presley is cooler than a zombolt, everything else is crap! However, the Americans instead of three ships built one, and abandoned the rest ... Only now there is no armor on it. And butterflies can not poop lol
    1. +2
      22 March 2016 18: 01
      "and the rest were abandoned" ///

      The other two are under construction.
      The second DDG-1001 was named Michael A. Monsoor
      Third DDG-1002 - Lyndon B. Johnson
  28. 0
    22 March 2016 16: 09
    Well, F-117, B-2, Lightning and Raptor were also miracle weapons when accepted. But in fact, they don’t know now where to put them))
  29. +4
    22 March 2016 16: 11
    Americans love these forms since the Civil War))
  30. +1
    22 March 2016 16: 11
    Quote: AlesanderRomanov
    e slut che beguiled me minus ???
    I’ll bother you with ghouls

    Romanov .. Actually, for a site moderator, such an appeal to users is rudeness .. Do not find ..?
    1. AlesanderRomanov
      -6
      22 March 2016 16: 20
      Do not find ..?

      Well, what about them yet? Generally, homosexuals do not put anything ..
    2. +2
      22 March 2016 16: 25
      Romanov .. Actually, for a site moderator, such an appeal to users is rudeness .. Do not find ..?

      do not pay attention, it is a CLONE!
    3. 0
      23 March 2016 04: 37
      Quote: igorek4515

      Romanov .. Actually, for a site moderator, such an appeal to users is rudeness .. Do not find ..?

      If a person cannot distinguish a cheap clone from a real nickname, then this indicates your level of intelligence. Which in turn explains your love for Kim and your unwillingness to accept the arguments of others.
  31. +1
    22 March 2016 16: 14
    Since the times of the Civil War, they love ships with a hull shape that is hardly noticeable to radar)))
  32. -4
    22 March 2016 16: 22
    ))))) f-bullshit 35 and 22, the characteristics of the hooh were also declared, and as a result, one kills its pilots during the flight, and the second generally flies only 40 minutes, and can’t shoot at all. As for this beauty, as far as I remember, he bites his nose at high speeds, they also wrote about this. Draw your own conclusions and it was written about its functionality. Believe me, I have not read such a rout.
  33. 0
    22 March 2016 16: 23
    Mmm, old bike. The Americans did the frigate uro with full automation, on microsoft windows ... Continue next? laughing
  34. 0
    22 March 2016 16: 31
    Sailors also do not want to cut the loot
  35. 0
    22 March 2016 16: 49
    The upside-down yacht "Trouble" from the cartoon.
  36. 0
    22 March 2016 16: 52
    Big torpedo - big torpedo
  37. +4
    22 March 2016 16: 56
    A serious piece of iron ... a hammer for it, you also need a serious one, here you can’t cope in one day ..
  38. 0
    22 March 2016 17: 34
    And will it withstand one serious "bulk" and how strong are its sides?
  39. 0
    22 March 2016 17: 36
    Why are you by God, a good target)))
  40. ZKB
    0
    22 March 2016 18: 50
    In response, the Russian military-industrial complex launched an anti-submarine torpedo VAMBOLT ....
  41. 0
    22 March 2016 19: 15
    something similar to the Aurora cruiser. according to the information in the article, there are no anti-aircraft defense tools other than anti-aircraft guns due to shells. I want to get a professional assessment of how vulnerable they are? Or let them make more spending, maybe they will die of hunger as in 29 year
    1. +3
      22 March 2016 20: 28
      Quote: 23424636
      something similar to the Aurora cruiser. according to the information in the article, there are no anti-aircraft defense tools other than anti-aircraft guns due to shells. I want to get a professional assessment of how vulnerable they are? Or let them make more spending, maybe they will die of hunger as in 29 year


      There are 30 blocks by 4 PU. Total 80 PU.
      Anti-aircraft missiles "converted Sea Sparrow" - fit 4 pieces and 1 launcher.
      Total anti-aircraft version can carry 320 missiles.
      Virtually invulnerable - except for a salvo of 30-50-100 missiles in a single ship.
      1. 0
        22 March 2016 23: 59
        Quote: mav1971
        There are 30 blocks by 4 PU. Total 80 PU.

        Victim of the exam?
  42. 0
    22 March 2016 19: 50
    Quote: AlesanderRomanov
    seven feet under the keel!!!
    Over the mast, you wanted to say. wink


    judging by the look and stop over the keel :)))
  43. 0
    22 March 2016 19: 55
    It looks like a submarine ...
  44. 0
    22 March 2016 21: 04
    And how many stupid, unscientific messages, frankly shameful PR of the Americans, that a railgun or a mega-laser will be installed on it ...
  45. +5
    22 March 2016 21: 21
    The ship is very serious - no need to engage in hatchet activity !!! You need to build your own - better, faster and cheaper if possible !!!
  46. +1
    22 March 2016 22: 39
    For every tricky Zumvolt we have a buoy with a thread, comrades without panic !!!
    We have enough funds to defend our coastal zones even without such wunderwafels, at the moment I consider it impractical to tuck such colossal funds into such ships. (Purely my opinion)
    It’s better to quickly put the supersonic missiles at the service and the sense of this bumbolt will immediately decrease, the ship itself is just one of the delivery vehicles (if you want a platform) and not a panacea.
    It’s kind of like a defense doctrine if I didn’t miss anything, although I think how to close the gaps in the defense, I think Leader’s are also bungled. at the moment there is a reasonable re-equipment of our army and navy.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"