Military Review

Diesel submarine "Alrosa" will not leave the Black Sea region

88
The submarine "Alrosa" will perform tasks only in the Black Sea, where its application weapons most expediently conveys RIA News message from a military source.


Diesel submarine "Alrosa" will not leave the Black Sea region


“Modern diesel submarines are capable of delivering missile strikes several thousand kilometers, so a submarine with a torpedo weapon has a narrow focus and it is advisable to use it in the Black Sea region,” the source said.

"The effectiveness of a torpedo attack on the submarine" Alrosa "has not decreased. It is still a formidable adversary for surface ships and strike forces of a possible adversary, ”he stressed.

The source also recalled that earlier the Black Sea Fleet had replenished with two “Varshavyanka” - one of the most low-noise submarines in the world armed with “Caliber” missiles.

Help Agency: The B-871 Alrosa diesel-electric submarine (project 877B) was laid down on May 7, 1988 on the stocks of the Krasnoye Sormovo shipyard. Admitted to the combat structure of the Navy of the USSR on December 1, 1990. Included in the 247th Separate Submarine Division of the Black Sea fleet Russian Navy. "
Photos used:
"Ecopolis"
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ros 56
    Ros 56 20 March 2016 11: 41
    +24
    A quarter of a century in the ranks, and rightly so. As the saying goes, the old horse does not spoil the furrows, but on occasion it will burn some "Cook"
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 20 March 2016 11: 44
      +39
      Quote: Ros 56
      but, on occasion, it zhahnet some "Cook"
      I think it is unlikely that the matter will reach the US "Cook", but the Turks would not hurt to arrange a second Sinop. In this case, Alrosa will definitely not be superfluous.
      1. DIVAN SOLDIER
        DIVAN SOLDIER 20 March 2016 11: 45
        +11
        And we also have "Zaporizhia".
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Ros 56
            Ros 56 20 March 2016 12: 00
            +1
            There are different torpedoes, one can send the entire fleet of Turks to the bottom.
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 20 March 2016 12: 02
              +8
              Quote: Ros 56
              There are different torpedoes, You can send the whole fleet of Turks to the bottom

              belay

              What kind of prodigy is this ??
              1. DIVAN SOLDIER
                DIVAN SOLDIER 20 March 2016 12: 04
                +11
                The wunderwaffle is called "hat-caliber"!
                1. Ros 56
                  Ros 56 20 March 2016 14: 50
                  +7
                  Actually vigorous is called.
                  1. Cat man null
                    Cat man null 20 March 2016 16: 17
                    +22
                    Quote: Ros 56
                    vigorous called

                    - I also know such a word
                    - I also know that it is somewhat heavier than usual (in TNT equivalent)
                    - I also know that the Americans once set up an experiment to sink the decommissioned troughs of nuclear munitions. Moreover, the troughs were quite compact. So, not all drowned and not immediately.
                    - I strongly doubt that the Turks are so ... stupid that they will specially assemble the entire fleet in one pile
                    - I don’t know if the boat described in the article is capable of firing such a torpedo
                    - I doubt very much that everything is so so much in the leadership of the Russian Federation .. stupid people that they will just order the use of nuclear weapons against a NATO member
                    - well, and so on.

                    IMHO you just fool, and now otmazyvatsya .. not good wink
                    1. Vitwin
                      Vitwin 20 March 2016 16: 29
                      +5
                      Quote: Cat Man Null
                      - well, and so on

                      Unfortunately I can’t put a cross, so I press a paw
                    2. Ami du peuple
                      Ami du peuple 20 March 2016 17: 01
                      +11
                      Quote: Cat Man Null
                      - I strongly doubt that the Turks are so ... stupid that they will specially assemble the entire fleet in one pile
                      Probably a comrade believes that the Turkish Navy can be lured into Turkish delight. And when they come together in a pile, then bang .. smile
                      Quote: Cat Man Null
                      - I don’t know if the boat described in the article is capable of firing such a torpedo
                      Well, not the T-15 tsar-torpedo in the same place, in fact .. Probably able to.
                      Quote: Cat Man Null
                      - I doubt very much that everything is so so much in the leadership of the Russian Federation .. stupid people that they will just order the use of nuclear weapons against a NATO member
                      Absolutely right. hi
                    3. olegactor
                      olegactor 20 March 2016 18: 06
                      .
                      PMN ... Dosses and you take a chance ... and see what remains of the Turks
                      1. Cat man null
                        Cat man null 20 March 2016 20: 48
                        +4
                        Quote: olegactor
                        PMN ... Dosses and you take a chance ... and see what remains of the Turks

                        To serve good

                        Young man .. here the presence of some thread of an exotic flag does not mean at all that a person lives where this flag comes from.

                        The site works like this. Where such IP come from - I have no idea. A piece called whoer, for example, shows me a completely honest IP request

                        This is so, for information, the future is clean .. yes
                    4. 73bor
                      73bor 20 March 2016 19: 11
                      +5
                      The most interesting thing is that the Turkish fleet is located quite compactly in itself, only three or four places of basing, and about nuclear weapons, of course, complete idiocy, everything can be covered with conventional missiles!
                    5. Asadullah
                      Asadullah 20 March 2016 21: 50
                      0
                      You just fled, and now otmazyvatsya .. not good


                      Waking you to take away toys from people ... tell me what the name is, Alrosa? I know there is Almazy Rossii JSC, not in honor of them?
                      1. Ami du peuple
                        Ami du peuple 21 March 2016 00: 44
                        0
                        Quote: Asadullah
                        I know there is Almazy Rossii JSC, not in honor of them?
                        Exactly. JSC "Alrosa" has been patronizing the submarine since 1997. Like the flagship of the KChF "Moscow", it used to be "Glory" until Luzhkov took over the patronage.
                    6. avdkrd
                      avdkrd 20 March 2016 21: 54
                      +8
                      IMHO you just fool, and now otmazyvatsya .. not good wink[/ Quote]
                      Your reaction to the existence of a torpedo from a special warhead is not clear. Firstly, the American experiment reflects only those conditions for the use of nuclear weapons that they were able to simulate (once) and then with reservations, since it was precisely the inability to sink the ships that was confirmed, and the factors due to which such an order would not be able to continue the task, the Americans very clearly described ... Secondly, do you have an idea of ​​the tactical conditions for the use of torpedoes with a nuclear warhead? In the Black Sea, there is no need to use torpedoes with nuclear warheads against individual ships or warrants. Only if it is impossible to solve problems by conventional means is it possible to use such torpedoes, and in this case there will be no difference (for the Turkish fleet) "in a heap" or not, since nuclear weapons will be used rather against bases, ports and straits. With regard to NATO members, the use of nuclear weapons will become a reality precisely in the event of NATO intervention, and NATO is well aware of this. I hope that the Third World War will not start because of Turkey.
                      1. Cat man null
                        Cat man null 20 March 2016 22: 44
                        +3
                        Quote: avdkrd
                        Your reaction to the existence of a torpedo with special warheads is not clear

                        The reaction is not to "the existence of a torpedo", but to a completely inappropriate, IMHO, mention of it. What I wrote there.

                        Moreover, "to drown the entire Turkish fleet with one torpedo", as the comrade put it there, is a feverish delirium, sorry yes

                        Typical "urryayaya !!!" IMHO.

                        Quote: avdkrd
                        In the Black Sea there is no need to use torpedoes with a nuclear warhead against individual ships or warrants

                        Exactly...

                        Quote: avdkrd
                        Only if it is impossible to solve problems by conventional methods it is possible to use such torpedoes, and in this case there will be no difference (for the Turkish fleet) "in a heap" or not, since nuclear weapons will be used rather against bases, ports and straits ...

                        Here Well, that’s nafigI would say ...
                      2. paul-muatdeeb
                        paul-muatdeeb 21 March 2016 21: 02
                        +1
                        It’s not necessary to kill a soldier. A wounded soldier (i.e. a disabled ship) is much worse and more expensive for an adversary than a killed one. The ship, which received numerous injuries, infected by radiation, on which the crew dies, brings much greater damage. It's like a suitcase without a handle ...
                        In addition, where did you get that 3.14 dos do normal tests. They even undermine armored vehicles on a landmine. crammed on 1 m on reinforced concrete slabs. Of course, the result will be optimistic. Ours then experience on the bottom of the surface.
                        And as for the cleverness of using the NSC - when REALLY PRESSED - all means will be good. And he will not give a damn about any opinions there.
                  2. Ros 56
                    Ros 56 21 March 2016 08: 22
                    +1
                    I envy you, ask questions yourself, answer them thoughtfully yourself, give us ratings, are you a teacher from the general staff of the sofa?
            2. nogBogHuk
              nogBogHuk 20 March 2016 19: 14
              +12
              Torpedoes with tactical nuclear warheads since the Soviet era were used so that the base and fleet will be destroyed if necessary.
              He himself served on diesel engines and on combat duty in "autonomous" 2 pcs. have always been.
          2. cniza
            cniza 20 March 2016 12: 04
            +8
            Quote: Ros 56
            There are different torpedoes, one can send the entire fleet of Turks to the bottom.



            Not all, but a solid effect can give.
      2. 79807420129
        79807420129 20 March 2016 11: 56
        +27
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        And we also have "Zaporizhia".

        You are mistaken, we have such "happiness" as the flagship of the Ukrainian submarine fleet "Zaporozhye" welded to the pier, so that it would not drown in good luck, thank God, this "happiness" belongs to Ukraine. hi
        1. NDR-791
          NDR-791 20 March 2016 12: 11
          -1
          It would be better if we bought this iron from Krainy! As an exhibit for the Museum of Glory of the Black Sea Fleet. And to build that museum in Balaklava Bay. And on the account of the fact that Alrosa will not come out of the Black Sea ... It will be necessary - even as it comes out !!! By the way, where is it served? Is it being repaired? Well, not in Nikolaev at the present time. I just really don’t know if there is an opportunity to fully service our fleet at this theater, or do we need to send it somewhere?
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Kos_kalinki9
            Kos_kalinki9 20 March 2016 12: 45
            +32
            I searched in the networks [quote] [/ quБ-871 “Alrosa” - the Russian diesel-electric submarine of project 877B “Halibut”, which is part of the 4th separate submarine brigade of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. As of August 2013, it was the only active submarine of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation. [1]

            The boat has repeatedly participated in the filming of feature films: in particular, in 1996 she was filmed in the film "First Impact" with the participation of Jackie Chan, as well as in 2003 in the Russian film about submariners "72 meters". [2] ote] [quote] On March 13, 1992, an incident occurred during which a part of the boat's crew swore allegiance to Ukraine and seized the boat. Thanks to the actions of the sailors on duty Zaitsev and Abdulin, who barricaded themselves in the engine compartment, as well as the upper watch officer V.P. Smychkov, who reported to Captain Romanov, who was on duty that day in the brigade, the seizure of the boat was suppressed. From 1992 to 1996, the B-871 did not go out to sea due to the lack of batteries. [/ Quote] [quote] According to information as of June 26, 2014, it is at the "13th Black Sea Fleet Shipyard" in Sevastopol under repair and modernization until 2015 of the year. In the course of the work carried out, two docking are planned. [10]

            According to information on February 17, 2015, repairs are underway at the 13th shipyard. [11] [/ quote] This boat is currently undergoing repairs with modernization elements at SRZ-13 in Sevastopol. Upon completion of the repair (end of 2015-2016 ???), the boat will be transferred to the newly created submarine base in Novorossiysk. A base for the deployment of 4 separate submarine brigades is being created on this base.

            I especially want to draw attention to the fact that this brigade is subordinate to the Commander of the Black Sea Fleet and will not be part of the forces of the Novorossiysk naval base.
            Tags: Russia, submarines, project 877/636, repair, fleet [quote] [/ quote]
            1. Boa kaa
              Boa kaa 20 March 2016 13: 13
              +40
              Quote: Kos_kalinki9
              According to information on February 17 of 2015 of the year, repairs are underway at the 13 shipyard. This boat is currently undergoing repairs with modernization elements at the SRZ-13 in Sevastopol.

              Well, since there are elements of modernization, it is not a sin to install "Caliber-PL". And also to put in order the water jet propulsion unit ... That's all right "Alrosa" in this regard, the pioneer of our submarine fleet.
              And a few words about the picture. Go to the pier with the bowed horizontal rudders thrown out ... the height of indecency! Navy gray! Where is the SPK looking !? And I would have turned the fur inside out: who better than him to know that if he gets stuck for a dive, it may not be enough for AB to get it back ... Then again: "Bubble in the nose" !?
              These are atomosics can make some noise, but for "tractor drivers", as one comrade said, with this case, oh, how strict! Something behind the cinematic passions blossomed "pike". You can't lose school!
              In the photo: The impeller of the water cannon is visible during the repair in PD.
              1. 73bor
                73bor 20 March 2016 19: 15
                +1
                I took it off my tongue, I also noticed that the horizontal rudders are deployed, probably what kind of "emergency"?
              2. agel26r
                agel26r 22 March 2016 18: 25
                0
                I agree with all that has been said. He served in this miracle in 1998. And judging by this photo of a water cannon of the same year.
            2. DenZ
              DenZ 21 March 2016 17: 22
              0
              and also in 2003 in the Russian film about submariners "72 meters"
              At 72 meters it was not Alrosa that was filmed but Magnitogorsk from the north.
            3. The comment was deleted.
          3. PPD
            PPD 22 March 2016 10: 31
            +1
            We have 641 square as museums and so at least 2 pieces in Moscow and Vytegra B 440.
            And Zaporozhye, well enough to scoff at the ship. It’s definitely not his fault that he got into fools.
        2. ruskih
          ruskih 20 March 2016 12: 17
          +7
          Quote: 79807420129
          Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
          And "zaporizhia &

          happiness "belongs to Ukraine. hi

          And here is a new proposal for the submarine "Zaporozhye"

          "Someone demolishes monuments, and someone creates monuments ... Truly long-suffering submarine" Zaporozhye ", according to the plenipotentiary of the President of the Russian Federation in the KFD Oleg Belaventsev, is likely to become a museum in Sevastopol."

          Source: http://politikus.ru/v-rossii/72529-ukrainskaya-podlodka-zaporozhe-stanet-russkim
          -muzeem.html
          Politikus.ru
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. UNFAMILIAR
          UNFAMILIAR 20 March 2016 12: 58
          +5
          Quote: 79807420129
          You are mistaken, we have such "happiness" as the flagship of the Ukrainian submarine fleet "Zaporozhye" welded to the pier, so that it does not drown in good luck, thank God, this "happiness" belongs to Ukraine. hi

          No, you are mistaken, and about the "pier" (repaired, including with our money, so to speak, "humanitarian aid" to Yanukovych), and "not needed" introduced into the KChF under its old "digital" Soviet name hi
        5. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 22 March 2016 11: 44
          +2
          Quote: 79807420129
          You are mistaken, we have such "happiness" as the flagship of the Ukrainian submarine fleet "Zaporozhye"welded to the pier, so that he would not drown, thank God no, this "happiness" belongs to Ukraine.

          Why are you offending the workers of the 13th Shipyard of the Black Sea Fleet? People tried to bring these waste products of the mammoth into a normal state - and you again mean "welded to the pier".

          Submarine "Zaporozhye" after repair at the shipyard was even able not only to submerge, but also to surface. Under the supervision of the ACC BSF RF. smile
          "Kommuna" probably looked at this submarine and was surprised: "I’ve already read something, a hundred years old, and I’m all as good as new. And this is searchingly young, but so neglected. Oh, no luck with the owners ..."
      3. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 20 March 2016 13: 22
        +1
        For what purpose? As a target, sorry about forty years ago, Soviet engineers and workers worked on this boat, gave their work and knowledge. As a monument to stupidity and betrayal of ebna and tagged? Also not an option, for the above reason.
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        And we also have "Zaporizhia".
      4. PSih2097
        PSih2097 20 March 2016 23: 48
        0
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        And we also have "Zaporizhia".

        as they say - it was welded to the pier, that would not have sunk ...
    2. weksha50
      weksha50 20 March 2016 12: 14
      +3
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      I think that it is unlikely that it will reach the state "Cook", but a second Sinop for the Turks to arrange would not hurt. In this case, Alrosa will definitely not be superfluous.


      so they themselves are asking ... They agreed that together with Ukraine (!!!) they are going to lock the Russian Black Sea Fleet in a "lake pool" ...

      It’s somehow strange ... then the Ukrainians are proud to have dug up the Black Sea, or else they suddenly call it a puddle ...

      PS "Varshavyanka" and RTOs will get their foe out of the Black Sea water area ... And "Alrosa" will confirm the thesis that Turkey will not get off with tomatoes ...
    3. DMB_95
      DMB_95 20 March 2016 12: 48
      +1
      Yes, most likely the torpedoes of this submarine are primarily for the Turks. But, if someone wants "out of turn", they will please him too.
    4. gg.na
      gg.na 20 March 2016 15: 41
      0
      She will come in handy here! The boat is what you need and it’s tightly knows what it is in the fight against the enemy fleet !!! wink
    5. ty60
      ty60 20 March 2016 23: 13
      0
      upgrade option-Gauges from torpedo tubes?
  2. Finches
    Finches 20 March 2016 11: 56
    +9
    After the creeps of Ankara and Kiev, to begin to create problems for our fleet in the Black Sea, you should not be shy to show the entire naval potential of Russia in this region! And with any real run-in - violation of territorial waters, blockade, etc., without embarrassment, use the entire range of weapons, so that it wouldn’t be disastrous! So let the boat go nowhere, but occasionally pops up near the beaches of Odessa, Nikolaev and Ankara. ..
  3. gg.na
    gg.na 20 March 2016 15: 40
    -1
    Yes, so zhahnet that this "cookie" will not even notice until the last second! lol And he won’t understand that they raped him, they blew him up and put him to the bottom wassat fish feed good !!!
  4. siberalt
    siberalt 20 March 2016 16: 25
    0
    Such a boat is already enough for the entire Ukrainian fleet. laughing
  • Lieutenant Izhe
    Lieutenant Izhe 20 March 2016 11: 42
    +3
    belay tricky strategic news, however! what
  • Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 20 March 2016 11: 45
    +7
    And everyone again began to ride with the compasses around the globe ... laughing
  • KnightRider
    KnightRider 20 March 2016 11: 45
    +2
    And she is in the ranks, Alrosa then?
  • barclay
    barclay 20 March 2016 11: 45
    +1
    Right. Duty escort for guests from NATO.
  • kostya-petrov
    kostya-petrov 20 March 2016 11: 51
    +1
    It turns out that this submarine will patrol our area under water and escort all the "guests" out of it. The question is, how will the interaction with anti-submarine aviation proceed?
    1. MARK
      MARK 20 March 2016 11: 55
      -5
      Quote: kostya-petrov
      It turns out that this submarine will patrol our area under water and escort all the "guests" out of it. The question is, how will the interaction with anti-submarine aviation proceed?

      Crimea controls everything ... And they will have another task!
  • infantry76
    infantry76 20 March 2016 11: 53
    +15
    An interesting story at this DEPL!
    In March 1992, they tried to capture it by those who took the oath of Ukraine, but failed. The sailors were vigilant. This can be found on Wikipedia.
    Let it plow the expanses of the Black Sea, protect the Crimea and scare our enemies!
    Glory to the submariners!
    I have the honor! soldier
  • VP
    VP 20 March 2016 11: 53
    +1
    What the news didn’t understand
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 20 March 2016 11: 56
      +2
      The news that Alrosa is dangerous to go beyond the Black Sea due to physical wear and tear. Well, near the shore to patrol the very thing, or to be used as a training boat.
      1. VP
        VP 20 March 2016 12: 03
        +2
        Well, they would have written in plain text - the boat is all, the old woman ran back. And then Warsaw with caliber dragged.
  • shinobi
    shinobi 20 March 2016 12: 01
    +3
    And so modestly it is silent that certain modifications of the PCR can be launched through a torpedo tube.
    1. VP
      VP 20 March 2016 12: 22
      0
      And what kind of RCC can it shoot?
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 20 March 2016 12: 52
      +3
      So 636 only through TA and bullet. There you need to modify both the iron in the compartment for missiles, and the control system itself. This has not been done, or rather it costs money, and the Moscow Region does not allocate money for it.

      For example, the Indians remake their Warsaw women under the Kyrgyz Republic, pay money and receive. But MO, under the program of modernization 877 - does not order this function. At least there is no Kaluga and no Vladikavkaz either.
      1. musorg
        musorg 20 March 2016 13: 06
        +1
        And I think that in vain. Apparently a big revision to install the ZS-14E.
      2. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 22 March 2016 11: 57
        0
        Quote: donavi49
        For example, the Indians remake their Warsaw women under the Kyrgyz Republic, pay money and receive. But MO, under the program of modernization 877 - does not order this function. At least there is no Kaluga and no Vladikavkaz either.

        Probably, they see no reason to spend money on upgrading the old 877s with the new 636.3, which the Admiralty shipyards bake like pies (2 years from bookmark to delivery to the fleet).
        It's easier to order a new submarine than to upgrade an old one. Moreover, when setting up the 877s for modernization, there is a great temptation to combine this business with the repair and modernization of other systems, which had been postponed until then. And, given the service life of these submarines, this will be long and expensive.
  • uragan114
    uragan114 20 March 2016 12: 07
    0
    "Alrosa" - I read it and thought, how does the Almazy Rossii corporation appear in the name of the submarine? belay
    It turns out - no way wink
    1. UNFAMILIAR
      UNFAMILIAR 20 March 2016 13: 07
      +2
      Quote: uragan114
      "Alrosa" - I read it and thought, how does the Almazy Rossii corporation appear in the name of the submarine? belay
      It turns out - no way wink

      In the troubled 90s they were sponsors (made life easier for the crew with supplies), like Severstal over Severstal
      1. agel26r
        agel26r 22 March 2016 18: 35
        0
        in '98 they bought a set of electric batteries for installation to replace the old ones, while the state did not have money for the fleet and every significant date for the boat was made a holiday for the crew. I am a living witness.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 20 March 2016 13: 27
      +2
      Quote: uragan114
      How does the Almazy Rossii corporation appear in the name of the submarine? It turns out - no way

      In the navy, traditionally, over a ship bearing someone's name (city), is patronized by a subject whose name the ship is named after ... So ... "diamond mine", maybe this is still on the Black Sea Fleet?
      PS. I’m wondering: who will take patronage over the “princes”? Really the diamond fund and the treasury of Russia ??? laughing
      1. avt
        avt 20 March 2016 14: 59
        +6
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        PS. I’m wondering: who will take patronage over the “princes”? Really the diamond fund and the treasury of Russia ???

        And guess from two times the chief "Prince Vladimir" and "Vladimir Monomakh" laughing
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 20 March 2016 16: 48
          +5
          Quote: avt
          And guess from two times the chief "Prince Vladimir" and "Vladimir Monomakh"

          Really the President of All Russia !? lol
        2. Serg65
          Serg65 20 March 2016 19: 38
          +3
          Quote: avt
          And guess from two times the chief "Prince Vladimir" and "Vladimir Monomakh"

          stop You are ... that nuka nuka !!!! Prince Vladimir will be the boss !!! laughing
  • From Tver
    From Tver 20 March 2016 12: 14
    +1
    As the saying goes, sleep and be afraid. Quietly, and then naaaaa!
  • VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 20 March 2016 12: 24
    +2
    News, however. I don't even know what to sew it on. Alrosa is now under repair. Commissioning is planned this year, although it was said that in 2015. If it goes to the Black Sea, then it is not planned to go to the Mediterranean. It is possible that the technical condition of "Alrosa" raises concerns and does not want to let her go far from the coast.
  • evgmiz
    evgmiz 20 March 2016 12: 31
    +2
    . "Varshavyanka" and RTOs will get their foe out of the Black Sea water area ... And "Alrosa" will confirm the thesis that Turkey tomatoes not get off.
    But it would be nice to tear Erdogan's personal tomatoes. They say that after this individuals become calmer. wink
  • Grabberxnumx
    Grabberxnumx 20 March 2016 12: 33
    +2
    It was this submarine "Alrosa" that played the role of diesel-electric submarine "Varshavyanka" in the movie "72 meters".
    1. kostya-petrov
      kostya-petrov 20 March 2016 12: 39
      +2
      and also in the film: "At all latitudes". wink
  • Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 20 March 2016 12: 39
    +1
    A very timely solution and good news!
  • VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 20 March 2016 13: 10
    +3
    Quote: Grabber2000
    It was this submarine "Alrosa" that played the role of diesel-electric submarine "Varshavyanka" in the movie "72 meters".

    No. Submarine Magnitogorsk was filmed in "72 meters"
  • alexmach
    alexmach 20 March 2016 13: 27
    +1
    Something I did not understand, what prevents the use of calibers, the ones that were made for the caliber of a torpedo tube? Does this really require large-scale conversion?
    1. Mobius
      Mobius 20 March 2016 14: 40
      0
      Quote: alexmach
      Something I did not understand, what prevents the use of calibers, the ones that were made for the caliber of a torpedo tube? Does this really require large-scale conversion?

      Interest Ask...
      1. altman
        altman 20 March 2016 21: 29
        0
        The lack of a missile control system interferes, and installing it is not the easiest thing
        1. Genry
          Genry 21 March 2016 01: 37
          0
          I think that as such a complex, a computer can be no heavier than a laptop.
          All information about the target and the route is transmitted from the operational headquarters, you just need to transfer it to the memory of the rocket and launch.
          1. alexmach
            alexmach 21 March 2016 10: 45
            +1
            The lack of a missile control system interferes, and installing it is not the easiest thing

            I think that as such a complex, a computer can be no heavier than a laptop.


            Well, actually yes. I am far from an expert, but trying to imagine this management complex, I see:
            - a box, maybe a couple, perhaps a heavier and larger laptop (military is still an hack), but still small in relation to the dimensions of the boat and the equipment already installed there
            - Cable routes to torpedo tubes (the box is then at the combat post)
            - Well, some kind of plug in the torpedo tubes.

            Well it does not look like a huge modification. Unless I took something into account.
  • surovts.valery
    surovts.valery 20 March 2016 14: 28
    +1
    Quote: VohaAhov
    Quote: Grabber2000
    It was this submarine "Alrosa" that played the role of diesel-electric submarine "Varshavyanka" in the movie "72 meters".

    No. Submarine Magnitogorsk was filmed in "72 meters"

    There was a series "At all latitudes", she seemed to be filming there. And also as a floating base - the armament transport "General Ryabikov".
    1. agel26r
      agel26r 22 March 2016 18: 37
      0
      With Jackie Chan, she did it for sure.
  • HaByxoDaBHocep
    HaByxoDaBHocep 20 March 2016 14: 31
    +3
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Quote: Kos_kalinki9
    According to information on February 17 of 2015 of the year, repairs are underway at the 13 shipyard. This boat is currently undergoing repairs with modernization elements at the SRZ-13 in Sevastopol.

    Well, since there are elements of modernization, it is not a sin to install "Caliber-PL". And also to put in order the water jet propulsion unit ... That's all right "Alrosa" in this regard, the pioneer of our submarine fleet.
    And a few words about the picture. Go to the pier with the bowed horizontal rudders thrown out ... the height of indecency! Navy gray! Where is the SPK looking !? And I would have turned the fur inside out: who better than him to know that if he gets stuck for a dive, it may not be enough for AB to get it back ... Then again: "Bubble in the nose" !?
    These are atomosics can make some noise, but for "tractor drivers", as one comrade said, with this case, oh, how strict! Something behind the cinematic passions blossomed "pike". You can't lose school!
    In the photo: The impeller of the water cannon is visible during the repair in PD.

    the most interesting thing is that I'm not a sailor and have nothing to do with the fleet at all, but when I saw in the photo how they go to the pier on the helm, I immediately thought that it’s impossible)
  • BOB044
    BOB044 20 March 2016 14: 54
    +1
    USSR equipment does not rust. And in a nearby submarine Zaporozhye has already taken root. Two countries, but how everything is different.
  • niki233
    niki233 20 March 2016 17: 05
    0
    Quote: kostya-petrov
    It turns out that this submarine will patrol our area under water and escort all the "guests" out of it. The question is, how will the interaction with anti-submarine aviation proceed?

    and for this we have a su-35 laughing
  • evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 20 March 2016 17: 45
    +2
    "The effectiveness of a torpedo attack on the submarine" Alrosa "has not decreased. It is still a formidable adversary for surface ships and strike forces of a possible adversary, ”he stressed.

    1. Actually, this message should have sounded a trace. Braz: "After the repair and modernization of the Black Sea Fleet, the B-871 Alrosa diesel-electric submarine (project 877V) was replenished.
    2. Source: "The effectiveness of the torpedo attack of the submarine" Alrosa "has not decreased."
    And why should it decrease after modernization ???
  • infantryman2020
    infantryman2020 20 March 2016 19: 55
    -1
    What a shame. It’s not clear what’s happening with the names of warships in the fleet. The calm Russian naval commanders in the coffin probably turned upside down.

    That diesel submarine was named after the sponsoring company. Sold for sponsorship. Well, sort of, naval prowess for sale. Not that Almazy Rossii is proud of: "We are patronizing submarine such and such," but on the contrary.

    Then the atomic boat will be named, for the sake of the sponsor, with a national bias. What is this "Ak Bars"? (with all due respect to the Tatars).

    Then the boats are given names for the names of cities and admirals. Crying or laughing, it's unclear ...

    And where is the tradition of the Russian fleet to give submarines the names of predatory fish and animals?

    Sailors, where is your military valor and naval traditions? Sad ...
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 22 March 2016 12: 32
      0
      Quote: infantryman2020
      That diesel submarine was named after the sponsoring company. Sold for sponsorship. Well, sort of, naval prowess for sale. Not that Almazy Rossii is proud of: "We are patronizing submarine such and such," but on the contrary.

      Uh-huh ... already 7 years after Almazy Rossii began helping the then nameless submarine B-871 and the submarine formation, they decided to rename the boat in honor of the sponsor - a company that is 2/3 owned by the state and municipalities.

      And since you stand up so much for the traditions of the Russian fleet, it would be useful to recall the destroyers Emir Bukharsky, Donskoy Cossack and Zabaikalets - they were named after the donors for their construction.
    2. agel26r
      agel26r 22 March 2016 18: 40
      0
      I do not agree with you. I can assure you about this boat, the Diamonds of Russia have done much more than all taken together in the then Kremlin.
  • atamankko
    atamankko 20 March 2016 22: 02
    0
    Everything in our piggy bank, let it remind ourselves of fear of adversaries.
  • Redfox3k
    Redfox3k 20 March 2016 22: 30
    0
    I agree with the names of trouble.
  • polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 21 March 2016 08: 12
    0
    "The old woman" will still serve, and then it will be training for a long time.
  • COJIDAT
    COJIDAT 21 March 2016 17: 15
    0
    The transition to purely rocket weapons and the cutting of tanks and attack aircraft was already in the history of the Armed Forces, and everyone knows what came of it! Let him swim.
    1. alexmach
      alexmach 21 March 2016 22: 34
      +2
      First of all, why on earth is the transition to "purely" missile weapons? A boat equipped with calibers can fire torpedoes from the same devices.

      Secondly, was this Khrushchev wrong? What tasks are not being solved by missiles now?
      Anti-tank weapons - missiles, even on tanks
      anti-aircraft weapons - missiles
      aerial combat - missiles
      strikes on the ground - missiles, and planning air bombs, which are also almost rockets
      Naval battles - missiles
      Strategic means and missile defense are again missiles.
      + MLRS + operational tactical systems.
      Bumblebee type flamethrowers - and those rockets
  • DPN
    DPN 21 March 2016 19: 47
    0
    Quote: Kos_kalinki9
    Thanks to the actions of the sailors, Zaitsev and Abdulin,

    Thanks to the GUYS, I hope Russia somehow thanked THEM?
  • dvg1959
    dvg1959 21 March 2016 20: 47
    0
    Combat unit, all for the good.
    And nuclear bp carries with him.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • starschina
    starschina 22 March 2016 19: 39
    0
    It is a pity, FORMER no longer makes any submarines!