North Korea carried out ballistic missile launches

71
Information Agency Renhap with reference to representatives of the South Korean armed forces, reports on the next launch of ballistic missiles, which was carried out by the DPRK. According to the source, at the 22 interval, two minutes were launched from the base in Pyongyang Namdo province. The Joint Committee of the Chiefs of Staff of the Republic of Korea states that at 17 km altitude the rocket disappeared from radar screens. It has been suggested that it exploded in the air.

North Korea carried out ballistic missile launches


The first rocket fired by North Korea around midnight (MSK) fell in the Sea of ​​Japan. According to the South Korean military, she covered a distance of more than 800 km. The maximum range of this type of missile (and we are talking about medium-range missiles "Nodon") does not exceed 1,3 thousand. Km. This is enough, for example, to strike at the territory of Japan.

Information about the launch of ballistic missiles confirmed in the Pentagon.

Recall that Pyongyang has repeatedly stated the response measures to South Korea and the United States, which are conducting joint military exercises on the Korean Peninsula. About 300 thousand South Korean and almost 17 thousand American servicemen are involved in these maneuvers.

The previous launch of the Nodon missiles of the DPRK was carried out in March 2014.
  • http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    18 March 2016 06: 43
    The first missile launched by the DPRK at about midnight (Moscow time) fell in the Sea of ​​Japan.
    Have you missed?
    1. +15
      18 March 2016 06: 46
      Shoot
      1. +4
        18 March 2016 07: 24
        Omeriga will be offended now. They will say that you don’t know how to shoot. Like, let’s we come to you and teach you.
        1. +7
          18 March 2016 07: 32
          Sworn partners can only teach on hospitals and bulldozers to hit. DPRK more 5the coal building is of interest. So partnership with the mattress will not work here.
          1. +3
            18 March 2016 08: 39
            Quote: Safer
            Sworn partners can only teach on hospitals and bulldozers to hit. DPRK more 5the coal building is of interest. So partnership with the mattress will not work here.

            So it seems that this building has already fallen. Such a small airplane named after Sikorsky.
    2. +6
      18 March 2016 07: 37
      North Korea carried out ballistic missile launches
      They have prava. From the point of view of American democracy-full prava. Right, the "respected" State Department and others?
      1. -6
        18 March 2016 07: 45
        Quote: GYGOLA
        They have prava. From the point of view of American democracy-full prava. Right, the "respected" State Department and others?

        And let me ask recourse what right "have". With shamelessness, painful ambition from Eun tensions are growing at the borders of RUSSIA... And fucking, this is not far from the BORDERS of the Russian Federation. "And the rest" is exactly what is needed.
        1. +10
          18 March 2016 07: 52
          Has_right_as_ any_ independent_country.
          1. 0
            19 March 2016 04: 21
            Quote: mixdiur
            Has_right_as_ any_ independent_country.

            From whom "independent" ... Pure blackmail is done and no more. hi
            1. 0
              19 March 2016 21: 12
              Put +, so that you would see and return to the topic. Blackmail, say.
              Pure blackmail and no more.
              But what do they demand in return? Blackmail implies some kind of action in favor of the blackmailer. What are they doing? Are they testing their missiles? They say that they turned both South Korea and the USA? Yes this is blackmail laughing и
              no more.
              They are doing everything right. It is recommended that the situation be implemented by all (European) states.
        2. +7
          18 March 2016 09: 42
          Knowing! 07.45. You might think Eun is threatening everyone! What is his shamelessness? The United States conducts its exercises, DPRK its. What is shamelessness? It is necessary for the DPRK to send 300 thousand soldiers to the shores of the United States to conduct exercises. And who is stirring up tension is not the DPRK. According to the speeches of American leaders, their country is right in the ring of enemies! They were threatened by Milosevic, and Assad is threatening, and Putin! But how recently were they afraid of Iran ?! How Israel bombed Iranian nuclear facilities and killed Iranian nuclear scientists. It is rather a ban on other countries from developing modern technologies. They can only be developed by the USA. This is such a ban on knowledge. In general, according to Gref. Knowledge should belong only to the elite. There is a monopoly on knowledge.
        3. +5
          18 March 2016 10: 19
          And let me ask you a recourse what right "have"
          The right to defend its state. Testing missiles in order to defend its state. The Russian Federation has no hysterics about this. Russia does not pester Korea, it respects, like any other state. We have a democracy without double standards. One has, and the other does not have (he dissent) from the "great" hegemon-known things belonging to the Great and the Mighty (though from his own opinion) USA. It seems that the time will come that many states on the planet will be able to prove the opposite to the USA. We can only be glad about this. a possible threat to the Russian Federation - any state poses a potential threat. Someone is more, someone is less. This is how the world on the planet works. Maintain a dialogue, mutually resolve emerging issues, do not try to "crush" the globe under yourself, do not consider yourself God on the planet, and people will be drawn to you. I don’t have to sit at a broken trough. Minus is not mine.
    3. +5
      18 March 2016 13: 50
      Good luck to comrade Kim! :) At least someone should have omitted the USA ...
      1. +1
        18 March 2016 19: 20
        unfortunately there is no time for fat

        Unhappy DPRK can not "let down" anyone

        Their nuclear and missile tests are just a way to scare off a much stronger aggressor

        The United States and South Caucasus excel in everything and regularly rattle with their power.

        The DPRK is just trying to escape from the attack and the bombing - that’s no longer for the USSR. and China, as it were, is not there.
  2. +2
    18 March 2016 06: 45
    They are training, they will soon start firing at goals.
  3. +3
    18 March 2016 06: 45
    North Korea carried out ballistic missile launches
    ... it starts right now: woof-woof-woof ...!
    1. +6
      18 March 2016 08: 43
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      North Korea carried out ballistic missile launches
      ... it starts right now: woof-woof-woof ...!

      And where is Romanov? chyto not see
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 09: 51
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        North Korea carried out ballistic missile launches
        ... it starts right now: woof-woof-woof ...!

        And where is Romanov? chyto not see

        Romanovich on the right in the bunker, Sanka pumpkin?
        1. +2
          18 March 2016 09: 57
          Quote: igor67
          Sanka pumpkin?

          stuffy and pivas ends))))
          1. 0
            18 March 2016 10: 04
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            Quote: igor67
            Sanka pumpkin?

            stuffy and pivas ends))))

            His beer never ends, the store is nearby drinks
            1. 0
              18 March 2016 10: 19
              Quote: igor67
              His beer never ends, the store is nearby

              Duc - bunker bunker far and lumpy lol drinks
  4. +1
    18 March 2016 06: 52
    and they will ask even more money in the American Congress)))
  5. +1
    18 March 2016 07: 05
    Let them make launches so that the United States is afraid.
  6. 0
    18 March 2016 07: 09
    Something went wrong!
  7. 0
    18 March 2016 07: 21
    hmm, one more exacerbation, there was not enough one more "hot spot" on our planet ... hi
    1. 0
      18 March 2016 09: 46
      Alfrid! 07.21. And who aggravates? There was an aggravation in Syria. We agreed on a truce and rushed to Ukraine. Now again agreed on a truce in Syria. Where will it explode now? Maybe now there, in the DPRK, they charge a charge?
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 12: 49
        Dear 34 region, the point is not that a charge is laid somewhere or something else, the fact is that one action gives rise to a response to it! it may be all the same to someone on a rocket, and someone will react to an exploding firecracker as if a war had begun in his house hi
        1. +1
          18 March 2016 15: 12
          Alfrid! 12.49. It's not about the rocket and the charge. The point is in principle. Give me a smoke. And why without a filter? And why without a lighter? And why not that brand? And in the face? hi
          1. 0
            18 March 2016 22: 08
            34 region well, this is already stupidly nitpicking) then let's just bang? in advance. but you never know what! Do you think this logic should be followed? hi
  8. -1
    18 March 2016 07: 23
    I’m laughing with information about testing Korean missiles.
    I know I’m wrong, but it “breaks through” the fun!)))
    I respect, of course, their aspirations and the fight against aggressors
    from the usa and south korea ...
    Okay! We drove! ..
    ... And, anyway, "punching" !!! ))))))))))
    Pyatnitstso, what does it affect?
    1. +2
      18 March 2016 07: 41
      Do not smoke in the morning. laughing
      1. +2
        18 March 2016 07: 59
        I do not smoke and I do not advise you!
        Simply, the mood is good! ))))))))))))
        1. +1
          18 March 2016 09: 15
          Oh damn, someone slammed you a minus.
          It was a joke.
          And it covers someone.

          SchA, tweak it)))
    2. +2
      18 March 2016 09: 43
      Quote: Mihalich17
      I’m laughing with information about testing Korean missiles.

      laughing
  9. +4
    18 March 2016 07: 24
    The United States and South Korea are actively provoking the DPRK to such actions. On the one hand, it is possible to understand the North Koreans, on the other, it is not beneficial for us or China to escalate the situation in this region.
    1. +2
      18 March 2016 07: 36
      Quote: rotmistr60
      The United States and South Korea are actively provoking the DPRK to such actions.

      Large joint exercises between Russia and Tajikistan are currently underway. We are not provoking anyone there? And then the border with China, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. Suddenly they, too, out of indignation, will also start firing their rockets somewhere! soldier
      1. +3
        18 March 2016 09: 52
        Bayonet! 07.36. Why not provoke! We provoke. Only not China and Afghanistan. When did the events in Ukraine start, who did we provoke? But the troops were moving across their territory! But it turned out that we have no right to move furniture at home! What time!
        1. 0
          18 March 2016 14: 27
          Quote: Region 34
          But it turned out that we have no right to move furniture at home! What time!

          And South Korea has no right to "move furniture at home" - just a provocation? smile
          1. 0
            18 March 2016 15: 15
            Bayonet! 14.27. The lion's share of furniture movers is American. Is this not a provocation? We are still arguing about the 22nd of June of the 41st. Did we have to hit first or what?
            1. 0
              18 March 2016 15: 43
              Quote: Region 34
              American furniture movers

              "300 thousand South Korean troops and 17 thousand American soldiers"
              Something is wrong with your shares! smile
    2. -6
      18 March 2016 09: 00
      Yes, no one provoked them even 10-15 years ago, until Ynin, Papa Ir, decided to blackmail everyone a bit and get more help. The South Koreans quietly helped in a gentle manner, they threw food and all humanitarian aid. There was even a joint railroad transit project through DPRK from Busan to Hassan. And about the Americans in South Korea was not heard, sat quietly, they were not very loved there.
      1. +4
        18 March 2016 09: 57
        Blondie! 09.00. Is food and humanitarian help? And in terms of creating industry, how did the West help them? The West loves to say: The hungry should not be given fish, but a fishing rod, so that they would fish and not be hungry. So what about fishing rods?
        1. 0
          18 March 2016 11: 08
          Quote: Region 34
          Blondie! 09.00. Is food and humanitarian help? And in terms of creating industry, how did the West help them? The West loves to say: The hungry should not be given fish, but a fishing rod, so that they would fish and not be hungry. So what about fishing rods?


          And why did the West have to help them? This is the enemy, and not only the ideological one, Russia and China helped and the industry created and science, for no reason, neither rockets nor reactors will appear. And, South Korea showed charity in favor of poor relatives. By the way, the construction of the railway would be a very strong help of the same, as you say, the West, and the deductions for transit, probably a small percentage in the budget. But then, probably, with the appearance of this "Western infection" it would become much more difficult to manipulate your people. Well, what they and you call a fishing rod is just a course of lectures by the rich for the poor on the topic "what needs to be divided in order to live well", in Russia they also conducted similar training courses, along with sex education.
          1. -1
            18 March 2016 15: 27
            Blondie! 11.08. Why would the West help them? But really, why? Did the West help us a lot in the 90s? How did we jump technologically? 0255! 12.08/14.30. Dumb Belarusian ruler? But why then the global crisis? It turns out all the capitalist rulers are stupid !? After all, had they been smart, there would have been no crisis! Why can't there be a crisis in Belarus if there is a crisis all over the world? Moreover, the lion's share of production is exported. Bayonet! XNUMX. What kind of nuclear fishing rod did the US give? What kind of fishing rod the USA give ISIS we know. There really is a fishing rod! Gave a weapon and spin as you can!
        2. 0
          18 March 2016 12: 08
          Quote: 34 region
          Is food and humanitarian help?

          Yes, help.
          Quote: 34 region
          And in terms of creating industry, how did the West help them? The West likes to say: The hungry should not be given fish, but a fishing rod, so that they would fish and not be hungry. So what about fishing rods?

          The state of industry and the well-being of a country depends not only on the strongest countries - the USA / Russia / China, but also on the government of the country itself. The same Ukraine, having from the USSR the KRAZ and ZAZ car plants, the Yuzhnoye design bureau, the Antonov design bureau, the Kharkov tank-building plant, the Nikolaev ship-building plant, etc., could live a normal life if they had normal authorities. Belarus receives cheap gas, oil and loans from Russia, the sanctions were lifted from us, the industry also got from the USSR - and the country is going up its ass.
        3. -1
          18 March 2016 14: 30
          Quote: Region 34
          The hungry should not be given a fish, but a fishing rod so that they catch fish

          And if they try to make a bow out of a fishing rod and threaten others? Do not give them more fishing rods! hi
  10. +2
    18 March 2016 07: 27
    Korean import substitution in action.
  11. Erg
    +4
    18 March 2016 07: 29
    In fact, the guy “works” well for the United States, creating tension (in my opinion, mouse fuss) in the region, which our American “partners” love so much.
    1. 0
      18 March 2016 08: 02
      Quote: Erg
      Actually, the guy "works" great in the USA

      Yes, it’s just the impression that he really wants to leave for the states :-)
      1. +3
        18 March 2016 09: 03
        Quote: sa-ag
        Yes, it’s just the impression that he really wants to leave for the states :-)

        smile
    2. +2
      18 March 2016 10: 07
      Erg! 07.29. What kind of tension does it create? I dont know. Does he make armed raids on Japan and the South Caucasus? Stealing in their coastal zone? He has backward technology! And who gives him modern ones? It’s better to turn over the country to the West and they will live well! Surrendered to the West Eastern Europe, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya. Butting Syria. How did these countries step forward technologically? In Soviet times, an Afghan astronaut flew into space. Does Afghanistan launch satellites today? But there is freedom and democracy. In the Baltics today is mouse fuss or a wide tread of progress?
  12. +1
    18 March 2016 07: 31
    DPRK loose change
  13. 0
    18 March 2016 07: 36
    DPRK is a horror story for Western countries.
    1. +5
      18 March 2016 07: 59
      Quote: L.A. A.
      DPRK is a horror story for Western countries.
    2. +2
      18 March 2016 09: 06
      Quote: L. A. A.
      DPRK is a horror story for Western countries.

      Yes, the DPRK does not represent a serious enemy for anyone, the maximum they can is to foolishly wipe 1-2 Japanese or South Korean cities off the face of the earth. Only after that the DPRK itself will be smashed to smithereens together with their "great marshal", and no ancient missiles will help them.
      Although it’s useless for Kim’s fans to explain wassat
    3. +1
      18 March 2016 09: 34
      Quote: L.A. A.
      DPRK is a horror story for Western countries.
  14. +3
    18 March 2016 09: 33
    Quote: 0255
    Yes, the DPRK does not represent a serious adversary for anyone, the maximum they can do is foolishly wipe 1-2 Japanese or South Korean cities off the face of the earth.

    Rather, South Korean. With distant goals, they do not always succeed. An example is a second rocket launched. It has been in service for a quarter of a century, and everything is torn. And what's the point in a large number of missiles, if PU is several times smaller, the fuel is not long-lived. Between starts, 25-30 minutes, if not more. Launchers will endure and all missiles will turn out to be useless trash
    1. 0
      18 March 2016 11: 15
      Quote: Old26
      Quote: 0255
      Yes, the DPRK does not represent a serious adversary for anyone, the maximum they can do is foolishly wipe 1-2 Japanese or South Korean cities off the face of the earth.

      Rather, South Korean. With distant goals, they do not always succeed. An example is a second rocket launched. It has been in service for a quarter of a century, and everything is torn. And what's the point in a large number of missiles, if PU is several times smaller, the fuel is not long-lived. Between starts, 25-30 minutes, if not more. Launchers will endure and all missiles will turn out to be useless trash

      You're right, but Juche fans won't believe you laughing
      1. +1
        18 March 2016 15: 31
        0255! 11.15. Juche fans will certainly not believe you! Remember September 11th. There was no nuclear charge. And how the United States immediately tightened the nut!
  15. +2
    18 March 2016 10: 00
    And let me ask you a recourse what right "have". With the impudence, painful ambitions from YN, tensions are growing along the borders of RUSSIA.

    And all these US-South Korean exercises, where more than 300 soldiers + atomic aircraft carriers participate, and so on, do not create tension at the borders of Russia .. Or do the Americans have no ambitions ..?
    Yes, no one provoked them even 10-15 years ago, until Ynin, Papa Ir, decided to blackmail everyone a bit and get more help. The South Koreans quietly helped in a gentle manner, they threw food and all humanitarian aid

    Learn better history and not by Wikipedia .. The Americans have been holding their nuclear weapons there since the end of the 50s against whom you ask ..? And all these large-scale exercises there have been held near the very borders of the DPRK for more than a decade .. This is not a provocation ..? = Periodic threats according to the "Iraqi" scenario to change the regime is not a provocation ..?
    In fact, the guy “works” well for the United States, creating tension (in my opinion, mouse fuss) in the region, which our American “partners” love so much.

    In general, tensions in this region are constantly created primarily by American "partners", although, as always, they are trying to shift the blame on someone else .. In this case, on the DPRK ..
    Yes, the DPRK does not represent a serious adversary for anyone, the maximum they can do is foolishly wipe 1-2 Japanese or South Korean cities off the face of the earth.

    But the American military themselves do not agree with you ..:
    http://politrussia.com/news/amerikanskiy-general-ssha-947/
    The chief of staff of the US Ground Forces General Mark Milli said that the United States is currently not ready for a possible war with Russia and China, Defense News writes.
    See full: http://politrussia.com/news/amerikanskiy-general-ssha-947/

    Well, here are his words about North Korea:
    "The US Army is now ready to fight IS (Islamic State, banned in the Russian Federation), Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra Front and any other terrorist group. When we talk about risks, we mean a large-scale war with one or two countries - China, Russia, Iran or North Korea ", - cites the publication of the word general

    Only after that the DPRK itself will be smashed to smithereens together with their "great marshal", and no ancient missiles will help them.

    to smash it then smash it .. But they themselves will receive it to the fullest .. And who needs it ..? Americans certainly do not need it ..
    Although it’s useless for Kim’s fans to explain

    well, fans of the United States and South Korea just "smash to smithereens" anyone .. First of all, North Korea and Kim personally ..)))))
    1. -1
      18 March 2016 11: 45
      to smash it then smash it .. But they themselves will receive it to the fullest .. And who needs it ..? Americans certainly do not need it ..

      DPRK - not the USSR or Russia, which can turn the USA into radioactive ashes (C) It is not known how many missiles they have, how realistic they can reach the United States. Judging by the fact that their missiles are constantly falling, it is not a fact that they will fly further than the UK.
      well, fans of the United States and South Korea just "smash to smithereens" anyone .. First of all, North Korea and Kim personally ..)))))

      It is worth writing badly about the "great" Kim, immediately declare a fan of the United States. For me, the US bombing everyone in a row and Kim, who turned the country into a concentration camp and threatens with a nuclear missile, are the same evil. Live in conditions like in the DPRK - let's see how you howl.
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 15: 33
        0255! 11.45. Are those living in the US happy? Is the US not a concentration camp?
  16. +4
    18 March 2016 10: 12
    Rather, South Korean. With distant goals, they do not always succeed. An example is a second rocket launched. It has been in service for a quarter of a century, and everything is torn.

    In Russia, the "bulava" began to fly normally long ago ..? Or have you already forgotten ..? Or, on tests, no one except the DPRK has any accidents and unsuccessful launches ..?
    And what's the point in a large number of missiles, if PU is several times smaller, the fuel is not long-lived. Between starts, 25-30 minutes, if not more. Launchers will endure and all missiles will turn out to be useless trash

    Have you personally checked what kind of rocket fuel they have and how long does it take to prepare for launch ...? Americans in 91m year in Iraq how many hunted for "Scuds" .. And what did everyone endure ..? And in Yugoslavia, at 99m, they also hunted for anti-aircraft missiles. They also took everything out or not ..? I would not be so categorically sure .. Well, read the link above from the interview of the American general again ..
    1. 0
      18 March 2016 11: 24
      igorek! And you are not a case of Korean? hi
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 11: 49
        Quote: Bayonet
        igorek! And you are not a case of Korean? hi

        He is a fan of Kim. He only has to offer him to move from prosperous Kazakhstan to a hungry DPRK - he refuses, like all other supporters of the DPRK laughing
  17. +2
    18 March 2016 11: 27
    And why did the West have to help them? This is the enemy, and not only ideological,

    Well, if this is an ideological opponent, then let them sit and shut up until they arrive ..
    Russia and China helped, and industry created science,

    Not Russia and China helped, but the USSR and China .. Do not confuse the USSR and Russia. This is not the same thing. Russia DPRK has never helped in anything serious. since for Russia the DPRK as well as for the USA is an ideological adversary. Russia is a capitalist country and the DPRK is socialist. catch the difference ..?
    . And, South Korea showed good deeds in favor of poor relatives.

    And they reminded a lot there ..? Basically, only more in words than in reality .. In reality, even in South Korea, it is forbidden to communicate with relatives in the North without permission from government agencies. Otherwise a prison.
    By the way, the construction of the railway would be a very good help from the West, as you say, and deductions for transit, probably a small percentage in the budget.

    Well, you know, "probably" this is not an argument .. You can give the budget of this project .. And you can give the budget figure for North Korea .. When you give all this, then we will compare how much and what is there .. And so it's just blah blah blah ..
  18. -2
    18 March 2016 12: 02
    --------------
    1. -3
      18 March 2016 12: 10
      Is this yet another patriotic dream of a DPRK fan?
      1. +2
        18 March 2016 13: 22
        For me personally this is another joke from the open spaces, and how you interpret it for yourself is your problem.
  19. 0
    18 March 2016 12: 31
    Quote: 0255
    DPRK - not the USSR or Russia, which can turn the USA into radioactive ashes (C)

    China, too, is not Russia in terms of the number of nuclear warheads, and it has much less of them than Russia, and then what ..?
    It is not known how many missiles they have, how real they can reach the United States.

    judging by the latest statements, missiles capable of reaching the United States they have. few but there ..
    Quote: 0255
    Judging by the fact that their missiles are constantly falling, it is not a fact that they will fly further than the UK.

    You on one case of a rocket fall concluded that their rockets are constantly falling ..? And about the ability to fly only to Yu.K. Can you somehow confirm this ..?
    Quote: 0255
    It is worth writing badly about the "great" Kim, immediately declare a fan of the United States.

    Well, just like you should only write positively about Kim, they immediately call him a fan of Kim or a jucheist .. Everything is mutual ..)))))
    For me, the United States and Kim bombing everyone in a row, turning the country into a concentration camp and threatening with a nuclear missile are the same evil

    And as for the concentration camp, are you judging by the most truthful South Korean and American media .. Or by the Russian singing along with the American ...? Actually, for such accusations we need strong evidence .. and not unfounded accusations.
    Live in conditions like in the DPRK - let's see how you howl.

    Are you so sure about this ..?
    igorek! And you are not a case of Korean?

    No, not Korean, Russian, I live in Kazakhstan.
    He is a fan of Kim. He only has to offer him to move from prosperous Kazakhstan to a hungry DPRK - he refuses, like all other supporters of the DPRK

    And you don’t offer .. If you are so worried about the safety of South Koreans or Americans, you have to believe that they are spiritually close to you, then why don’t you yourself move to South Korea or the USA .. And do not offer others to cross ...? I already answered you .. you even copied my quote .. do you repeat it again ..?
    Is this yet another patriotic dream of a DPRK fan?

    Well, I’ll be silent about the dreams of Uri-patriots of Americans and South Koreans ..
    1. -2
      18 March 2016 13: 00
      judging by the latest statements, missiles capable of reaching the United States they have. few but there ..

      According to the North Korean press?
      You on one case of a rocket fall concluded that their rockets are constantly falling ..? And about the ability to fly only to Yu.K. Can you somehow confirm this ..?

      And you yourself can confirm that the DPRK missiles will reach the United States?
      And as for the concentration camp, are you judging by the most truthful South Korean and American media .. Or by the Russian singing along with the American ...?

      Everything is forbidden for them, there is no food, they are obliged to praise Kimov - why not a concentration camp?
      Are you so sure about this ..?

      Yes I am sure. You are used to the American computer, the American Internet, personal transportation, and the absence of a shortage of goods. In the DPRK, all this is prohibited; their deficit is worse than in the USSR. Definitely not howling?
      And you do not offer ..

      Why not offer something? Earth paradise is there, judging by your comments
      If you are so concerned about the safety of South Koreans or Americans

      I am generally for world peace. Only we humans cannot survive without wars. And I would not want a nuclear strike on the South Caucasus.
      I suppose they are spiritually close to you, why don’t you yourself move to South Korea or the USA ..

      The United States and their policies are definitely not close to me, so I am not going to go there.
  20. +1
    18 March 2016 12: 52
    And then .. All those who are hysterical from Kim for some reason have a passionate desire to send all those who disagree with them to the DPRK .. But at the same time, they all cry so passionately that Yu.K. helps "evil Kim" and everything is so beautiful there and people live so freely and wonderfully .. only now I have a question .. why are all these personalities here and not there, ..? but at the same time their ooponents certainly want to send for permanent residence in the DPRK ..? What is this .. a passionate desire to get rid of all dissenters ..? the impression is that these citizens have learned from the "independent ukropatriots" .. Remember during the Maidan they had the slogan "suitcase, station Russia" .. It looks like the same thing here ..
  21. +1
    18 March 2016 13: 23
    Quote: 0255
    And you yourself can confirm that the DPRK missiles will reach the United States?

    I can’t confirm, but I can’t deny .. all the more categorically as you.
    Quote: 0255
    Everything is forbidden for them, there is no food, they are obliged to praise Kimov - why not a concentration camp?

    What exactly is this ..? The only thing that comes to mind is the lack of Internet access .. nothing more .. I talked with people who were there, unlike you .. at the expense of food .. This was written to you by the South Korean media .. You post pictures of North Korean stores with shelves ..? Or say that this is window dressing and propaganda .. However, you simply can’t answer another .. you are firmly convinced that everyone will starve there ..))))
    Yes I am sure. You are used to the American computer, the American Internet, personal transportation, and the absence of a shortage of goods. In the DPRK, all this is prohibited; their deficit is worse than in the USSR. Definitely not howling?

    Firstly, my computer is not American but Chinese. Secondly, the Internet is not the only good in life. Personal transportation is also not an achievement of only Americans. He was both in the USSR and in the DPRK test, though not as much as in the United States. Due to the fact that all this is forbidden there, you just knowingly lie or simply do not know .. One of two .. there is certainly no shortage there. The income of some categories of citizens is low and yes, but this does not apply to the deficit. In Kazakhstan, too, not everyone has a high income in the absence of a deficit ..

    Quote: 0255
    Why not offer something? Earth paradise is there, judging by your comments

    well, so I suggest you go live in the USA if they say everything is so cool ..
    Quote: 0255
    I am generally for world peace. Only we humans cannot survive without wars. And I would not want a nuclear strike on the South Caucasus.

    Well, if you are for world peace, then why do you not blame the Americans and South Koreans for provoking the DPRK with their teachings and plans to seize territory and overthrow the government, bombing the DPRK territory .. Or do you think this is not a threat to world peace ..?
    Quote: 0255
    The United States and their policies are definitely not close to me, so I am not going to go there.

    I, too, don’t like the DPRK with their policies, but I oppose their isolation and demonization simply because it certainly will not lead to peace on this peninsula.
    1. -3
      18 March 2016 14: 31
      You post pictures of North Korean stores with full shelves ..? Or say that this is window dressing and propaganda .. However, you simply can’t answer another .. you are firmly convinced that everyone will starve there ..))))

      Exactly what a window dress, they have shops for their citizens, for tourists and for the government. Tourists are not allowed in stores for ordinary North Koreans
      Firstly, my computer is not American, but Chinese.

      But developed by an American company.
      Secondly, the Internet is not the only good in life

      Not the only one. But why should it be forbidden to ordinary North Koreans? Cut off Kim’s Internet fan - how will he sing? Kim’s fan, living in her beloved DPRK, will not even be able to minus me.
      personal transportation is also not an achievement only for Americans. He was in the USSR and in the DPRK test, though not as much as in the USA.

      In the DPRK, only civil servants can have a private car, unlike normal countries. Personal transportation, of course, is not only the merit of the Americans. But who invented the conveyor, made the car not a luxury, but a means of transportation? Who supplied equipment and technologies for the GAZ plant in the 1930s? GAZ-A, GAZ-AA and GAZ-AAA cars were licensed copies of which company? The Soviet automobile industry generally copied a lot of things from the decaying west, even outdated, to the detriment of Russian developments.
      Do you have a car yourself? Ban you ride it, will you like it?
      In Kazakhstan, too, not everyone has a high income in the absence of a deficit ..

      And in your favorite DPRK, there is a deficit for ordinary citizens, and cards, and low incomes.
      well, so I suggest you go live in the USA if they say everything is so cool ..

      I do not support American politics, and you welcome Kim’s policy on the threats of nuclear weapons. Catch the difference? wink
      Well, if you are for world peace, then why do you not blame the Americans and South Koreans for provoking the DPRK themselves with their teachings and plans to seize the territory and overthrow the government, by bombing the territory of the DPRK ..

      But Kim’s nuclear tests and the threat of a nuclear strike force the South Caucasus to hold a strong army. The vicious circle turns request

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"