General Leonid Ivashov: “Our defense spending cannot be considered overstated”

59
General Leonid Ivashov: “Our defense spending cannot be considered overstated”The US Senate approved the Pentagon budget for 2012-year in the amount of 662 billion dollars. Our opposition insists that Russia spends a lot on defense, although the military budget of the Russian Federation is an order of magnitude less than that of the United States.
The situation is commented by the president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Colonel-General Leonid IVASHOV:
- Our spending on defense can not be considered excessive. Moreover, they are insufficient.
The Liberals have done a lot since the 90s to destroy the material base, the material basis of our defense. Today, they continue to frighten us that we spend a lot of money not on medicine and education, but on the military-industrial complex.

I would stress that if there is no opportunity to ensure the military security of the country, then there will be neither education, nor science, nor medicine, since there will be no country itself. Without exaggeration, I will say: today the question of the existence and survival of the Russian state is seriously facing.
Russia cannot now compete with the United States in terms of the level of the military budget, and this is useless. We have different geostrategic goals. Russia wants only security. Americans seek to conquer, subjugate the whole world. Their strategy is offensive, with a claim to world domination.
But Russia should seriously think about the state of its defense security. We need to understand the trends that are observed in the world - the growth of military spending is going on in almost all countries.

Especially those of our rivals who claim to our resources, want to subordinate our foreign and domestic policy to their interests.
The country's security is the most important function and task of any government. Safety is her main concern.
How much, how little do we spend? Well, given that all 90s have destroyed Russia's defense capabilities, urgent measures are needed to revive its military power.

Requires serious scientific and prognostic studies. It is necessary to identify options for threats, risks to Russia's security and determine measures (and only specialists can do this) how to neutralize these threats.
We need a new concept of our security, taking into account various factors. First of all - foreign policy.
Russia has practically no serious ally. We need to actively form the system of allies.
With China, we must jointly neutralize common threats: to restrain the US nuclear missile potential, their missile defense system. I believe that here China will go for joint actions.

We need allies in other regions. For example, this is India. We need to work in the Middle East, with Iran, with Brazil.
The alliance is not very costly, but very effective.
The second direction is the CIS. We must have a common defense space not only with Belarus, but throughout the entire CSTO space. And it necessarily provides for the coordination of the military-technical program for all countries.

Security policy should be based on a material basis. On the military and military-technical potential of the state. And we must not just allocate money, but there must be a concept for the development of armaments for ten years.
And businesses need to know which types weapons they have to create. A long-term state defense order for specific types of equipment, research and development work is needed.

If we restore our defense-industrial complex, and even skillfully use the defense achievements for civilian innovative programs, our technologies, then we can go on to reduce part of the defense budget.
But only if the military-political situation in the world allows.
Today, however, it is necessary to drastically increase costs in order to restore the former power of our defense complex.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mar.tira
    +13
    13 December 2011 11: 12
    Eh, if Taburetkin hadn’t put them in his pocket yet, and hadn’t bought imported furniture, it would have been great.
    1. vadimus
      +5
      13 December 2011 11: 52
      I agree, if you don’t cut, then the amount is decent
      1. mar.tira
        +3
        13 December 2011 11: 59
        Quote: vadimus
        if you don’t cut

        You see, someone does not agree, it is necessary that Taburetkin folds. I slammed a minus for this. But I know who appeared, therefore I am not surprised.
  2. -2
    13 December 2011 11: 14
    The last two paragraphs directly in support of Putin said
    1. that
      -1
      13 December 2011 15: 18
      The last two paragraphs directly in support of Putin saidurzul,
      urzul,
      The last two paragraphs directly in support of Putin said
      SAMPLES ETO FROM THE SOUL
  3. NovoSibirets
    +6
    13 December 2011 11: 19
    Eh .., Leonid Sergeyevich, I would have thrown you about 10 years old, but I would have to join the presidential company earlier ..
    1. -1
      13 December 2011 11: 26
      We need allies in other regions. For example, this is India. We need to work in the Middle East, with Iran, with Brazil.
      The alliance is not very costly, but very effective.
      The second direction is the CIS. We must have a common defense space not only with Belarus, but throughout the entire CSTO space. And it necessarily provides for the coordination of the military-technical program for all countries.
      Well, to be honest, this is from the category of a very distant future, this is very difficult to achieve
      1. NovoSibirets
        +5
        13 December 2011 11: 33
        Do we still have easy tasks? We are around under the check. Our allies were beaten off, our enemies were fed, the fifth column was smoked, recently, they spurred. Lined and laced methodically and diligently. Get out easily and soon - do not hope.
        1. 0
          14 December 2011 00: 49
          For each check, we will answer with obscenities!
    2. +2
      13 December 2011 13: 31
      Quote: NovoSibirets
      I’d throw you about 10 years old, but it’s early to join the presidential company ..


      At least it doesn’t do anything stupid, In China, this age is welcome
      1. Sergh
        0
        13 December 2011 13: 39
        throw you 10 years old,

        I wonder, you yourself believe what you are talking about!
    3. +2
      13 December 2011 14: 42
      NovoSibirets,
      Everything has its time! Time to throw stones and time to collect them ...
      The decision must ripen. Age is not a hindrance. And we do not know God's providence! Maybe the Russians (all Russian citizens) have a chance!
      General Ivashov for the presidency!
      1. that
        0
        13 December 2011 14: 56
        yes hto give it to him, though he’s a good guy. I like the way he acts --- however right now, Putin got hold of Russia from the Leningrad communal apartment and knocked on the door at the foundry wink a friend of a Jewish rogue sobchak (who even saw through an awesome ebn)
        Vova Putin will not give up wink
        and you’ll be true further on here, my dear graduates of the schools me ve te de wink
    4. Oleg
      +1
      13 December 2011 21: 08
      NovoSibirets,
      Your wish has been taken into account:
      On Saturday, December 10, there was a meeting of 500 people - the official nominees of Leonid Ivashov, a presidential candidate. This procedure is required by law. Now, on Monday, December 12, the documents will be sent to the CEC, and we will wait for confirmation of the official registration of Leonid Grigoryevich as a presidential candidate. Only after that we will have subscription lists and we will be able to start a campaign to collect signatures.

      http://leonid-ivashov.livejournal.com/
      Case for support.
      1. NovoSibirets
        0
        13 December 2011 21: 23
        Received, Oleg.))
        Only a little late in the day, however, you are fussing. In order to do such a thing in a serious way, I had to turn on a year ago, in my humble opinion. And now, in order to achieve the result, you just need to EXPLODE the public! Here, such a PR is needed, Mom, do not worry! Ivashov, although a well-known person, is still in very limited circles! And this is probably 5-7 percent of the entire electorate? Not "weather".
        Although the people with whom they discussed are for. They support it unconditionally. There is truth, too, remarks, as here on the site, that the president should be both an economist and a skater and a sparkling player, and Ivashov, they say, is a purely military analyst, etc. teams. Try it. I immediately said - "Ivashov will be balancing - my voice is his, and I also think I will bring 5-7 people in the beak", and if you seriously trample, then I will campaign people in the network, since there are many friends))
        Go ahead, Oleg!
        1. 0
          13 December 2011 23: 05
          Novosibirets! I'm with you!
          And to those who are eager for next economists with lawyers, answer that in 90 they already got such. Gaidar he generally Harvard finished.
  4. Desert Fox
    +5
    13 December 2011 11: 26
    Our opposition must remember the golden words in my opinion!
    A PEOPLE WHO DOES NOT WANT TO FEED THEIR ARMY! WILL BE FEEDING SOON ALIEN !!!
    1. NovoSibirets
      +4
      13 December 2011 11: 40
      Oh oh oh!)) Feel free to put an equal sign between the opposition and the people!
      And then, what kind of opposition are you talking about? If about the system, then everything is in order, the majority listens to Napoleon. And the non-systemic (including orange) the devil himself is not a brother! "What will .. what bondage .." The main thing is to achieve selfish goals. Russia is the last thing they think about.
      1. lightforcer
        -1
        13 December 2011 12: 04
        Does the double-headed eagle think of Russia in the first place?
        1. NovoSibirets
          -2
          13 December 2011 14: 06
          Everything is relative. And concern for Russia is no exception.
    2. -1
      13 December 2011 12: 58
      I don’t understand who the opposition means. How long have the authorities been in power and what has been done except chatter? Even after Yeltsin the Army and working defense plants remained, and now, when it’s not even the cleverest to see what the West is striving for, remained miraculous. And the people are beautiful pictures and chatter smart on all channels. There is Ivashov’s speech at the congress of officers in February 2009, there he generally talked about things that could not be called betrayal ... And what is he constantly pulling that Serdyukov, what, he himself became a minister? Or, what he does is not known to the prime minister and to another, also the boss? In the best case, this is naive ...
    3. Capture
      -1
      13 December 2011 13: 23
      The opposition is different, and sometimes pathos is just a hindrance (a good quote is just out of place!)!
  5. recruit
    0
    13 December 2011 11: 49
    We jumped, improved. We will fight with stools.
  6. storm12
    +2
    13 December 2011 11: 58
    As much money as possible in defense! And the military-industrial complex will pull us! Yes, everything is written correctly! And horror stories about the fact that the budget will tear from this, complete. The defense industry is thousands of highly qualified jobs, new technologies, factories, enterprises, etc. Somewhere it was written that the Union fell apart due to an arms race, too. It fell apart due to the rotten tops and the control system that did not want to change! Our defense industry just need to fill up with orders for the most I can not! And monitor the quality!
    1. +1
      13 December 2011 14: 13
      Quote: storm12
      the budget will tear

      each serviceman - a uniform from Yudashkin, an expensive machine gun with rhinestones, more "Maybachs" to strengthen the "Arbat military district" and that's it, a skiff, the budget has burst lol Here in such defense orders from Taburetkin it is believed somehow more! Perhaps they will find money for this.
    2. evg5835
      +1
      13 December 2011 20: 28
      Storm 12. Something is not enough for you + put buddy). Although I wrote everything correctly. I put my +. I bastard from the local "public") They write not in the subject and, as a rule, the same thing and add to each other. Generalchikov earn. Maybe someone knows how Ivashov feels financially? As far as I remember, he commanded the General Staff in times of trouble. There are simply too many of his publications. Nothing new, at least for me) And it seems to me that the army is strengthening and will be safely strengthened without his help. I could be wrong, of course.
  7. +2
    13 December 2011 12: 23
    As always, the opposition is speculating now on the military budget. There is no need to go to the trick. I immediately remembered how the president fired Kudrin in a tough form, everyone should do this!
    1. that
      -4
      13 December 2011 15: 05
      and how much did he endure ??????????????????????????????????????? wink
      maxim, you licked effectively, just like Isaev or Gryzlov
      1. 0
        13 December 2011 17: 23
        Maxim rightly said. Ki, you opposition licked spectacularly.
        1. that
          -5
          13 December 2011 17: 25
          oh, here the general bear troops wink
          1. rysich
            +2
            13 December 2011 17: 47
            There are also ordinary people who support Putin, we are many and we are in vests.
          2. +1
            13 December 2011 18: 22
            I here a little read your comments Konstantin. One bile ... Is it normal with your head? Maybe something bad happened in life? Maybe the Ministry of Internal Affairs did not deal correctly with your great personality? Are you offended by yourself, or by the power?
            1. that
              -1
              13 December 2011 19: 00
              Imagine a shame for the homeland
              1. +3
                13 December 2011 19: 12
                Quote: ki
                Imagine a shame for the homeland

                then take the trouble to write it with a capital letter, otherwise somehow the offense is not visible
          3. +4
            13 December 2011 19: 11
            Well, why rudeness? !!!
            tea is not in the doorway, or without dirt do not express their opinion?
  8. Motherland
    -1
    13 December 2011 12: 24
    We need to do a lot, but not to whom ...
  9. +4
    13 December 2011 12: 48
    If you want peace, get ready for war !!!
    It always has been !!!
  10. Capture
    -1
    13 December 2011 13: 19
    Good, correct article and author to match !!!
  11. SL.Kocegar
    -1
    13 December 2011 13: 36
    want peace, get ready for war
  12. Motherland
    0
    13 December 2011 13: 46
    It is a pity that ours, according to the latest news, began to prepare late.
  13. same
    0
    13 December 2011 14: 00
    We have different geostrategic goals. Russia only wants security.


    Russia never wanted ONLY security.) Russia, like all other large states with a long history, has had imperialist sentiments. And you won’t get anywhere from this. Another question is whether it is good or bad, and for whom.
    Anyone need to raise the defense industry, because without it there really would be no country. And the question is about the survival of Russia as a single state.

    With China, we must jointly neutralize common threats: to restrain the US nuclear missile potential, their missile defense system. I believe that here China will go for joint actions.

    China will take all steps as long as it is beneficial to it. Two huge countries, each with its own problems, have a common border. It’s like two lions on the same territory, who just do not yet compete openly. Here it is more interesting who is the greater enemy, pendostan or China.

    We must have a common defense space not only with Belarus,

    Unification, cooperation with Belarus is certainly good. Two countries have always been inextricable. And as if I did not want to believe in it, but if any mess suddenly begins, Russia will surrender Belarus without hesitation. We are just a buffer for Russia. It may be with some kind of production, but for the most part, a buffer.
  14. 0
    13 December 2011 14: 01
    Quote: SL.Kocegar

    want peace, get ready for war

    And this applies not only to the military.
    Remember the Stalin years - EVERYTHING was prepared, even schoolchildren. And now.....
    And you never need to spare money on the army, weapons and BP. And then they lived to the point that there was no one to shoot from guns and tanks, retired officers were being planted for them .....
    1. that
      -5
      13 December 2011 14: 58
      why do we need an army ??????
      right now we need only policemen and internal troops
      give Serdyukov !!!!!!!!!
      1. 0
        13 December 2011 16: 40
        Verb stupidity, even explain what it makes no sense.
        1. that
          -3
          13 December 2011 16: 45
          yes why
          explain wink
          I explain --- the army is not needed by the way, but the police are needed
          you, as I understand it, also from there --- a fighter with the people wink
          1. +2
            13 December 2011 19: 16
            In general, such a boorish attitude towards People in "blue uniforms" has never been good for Russia.
            when you bake yourself and run to them for help, and among them there are a lot of those who don’t have money, who really hurt the Power and get stupid on their knives and substitute their cars so that they don’t drive a drunken scumbag into the crowd of children, and you remind me of those who in 95 Army shit watered when this Army covered their asses
        2. rysich
          +1
          13 December 2011 17: 51
          Uv.Vasilenko Vladimir, do not worry, read the comments of Mr. KI to other articles, the same rotten set of phrases.
          1. +1
            13 December 2011 19: 13
            Yes, I read it yesterday, I had a suspicion that the young man was very offended by everyone and the cops, including, apparently, from the skins or those who sympathized with the pseudo-Slavic culture.,
      2. Anatoly
        0
        13 December 2011 17: 59
        A people who does not want to maintain their army will sooner or later contain someone else's.
  15. ivachum
    -3
    13 December 2011 15: 09
    "I am NOT interested in the PLANS of our enemies, I am interested in THEIR POSSIBILITIES." Otto von Bismarck am

    "War is not when they WISH, war is when they CAN." Well, somewhere almost like that. wink

    So, that a war with China is quite possible ... but, fortunately, is not soon (an example of a war at will - 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX). But with Estonia wink no, the elephant will not chase the puffing pug. tongue
  16. -1
    13 December 2011 15: 15
    The author said absolutely right and the first commentator said absolutely right. Some thieves are on the thief and it will be a blatant bl ... continue until we elect another president. Still, I think you should not look negatively that they say vote do not vote anyway x ... .Where the new president - there is a new minister of defense. But now the president and the prime minister don’t know that pi ... Ra Taburetkin hates everyone - he knows correctly, but for now the head of Russia is this .... he’ll ruin the defense industry and we will protect the oligarchs with our lives, as this is happening now ... They live, we protect them with rusty old weapons ... angry recourse angry recourse
    1. that
      0
      13 December 2011 15: 21
      and who is new? Vova ????? here are all the graduates of Meveda only for Vova wink
      it's a zombie wink
      1. 0
        13 December 2011 15: 39
        Yes, what a Vova !? Vova could do in due time, but did not. So that he is the weakest link ...
        1. Anatoly
          +3
          13 December 2011 18: 04
          Yes, Vovchik is not the point. It is clear that other people stood and are behind him. So to speak "shadow managers". We, the inhabitants, and half do not know what is really going on. Only in portions that are thrown to us from the master's shoulder, passing off as the truth. Putin is also a man and far from the stupidest one. In many situations he could do a lot, but did not. It is a huge responsibility when the fate of the whole country rests on you and the whole world is looking at you. But nevertheless, it prompts the idea that someone else is behind Vova.
          1. that
            0
            13 December 2011 19: 03
            he has owners
            that's for sure
      2. -2
        13 December 2011 16: 45
        they didn’t take you to the police at one time ?!
  17. that
    0
    13 December 2011 15: 42
    Vova just ruined wink
    and now America threatens with a finger, stsuka am
    1. +1
      13 December 2011 16: 46
      But what exactly did you ruin?
      not oguno say ALL, but specifically, for example, in 2000, the plant produced 100 pillows, and now only 10
      1. that
        -3
        13 December 2011 17: 01
        army and navy
        and developed meeeveda --- where did you serve wink policeman

        and right now in tyrnet rose to the underground wink
        and do not think that the cop
        1. +3
          13 December 2011 17: 37
          You don’t know the Russian language, your imagination is wan, you don’t express your thoughts - one boring, cheap yapping !! The village is not asphalt and the deer is never literate !! It's a pity for you, wretched, even a minus to put broke. You and others like you, are themselves "minus", and your life is shameful and ridiculous. (PEOPLE, DO NOT SHOOT WITH "KI", THERE ARE NO NECESSARY PEOPLE - THEY STILL CAN SERVE A BAD EXAMPLE)
          1. that
            -4
            13 December 2011 17: 42
            warrior of the Putin race wink
            put camouflage on and off against grandmothers
            and you won’t even get crumbs from the master’s table ...
            1. +1
              13 December 2011 17: 50
              YOU ARE THE FIRST OF THEM lol under clean !!! (Are you probably a grandmother? Or are you from ur0ds, who hide behind grandmothers at rallies and throw bottles? Why are you so upset by the police, it prevents you from stealing? Ah, a guardian for the public good !!)
              1. +1
                13 December 2011 19: 21
                Quote: kostiknet
                Why are you so upset by the police, does it prevent you from stealing?

                banged on the head with a democratizer
                1. +1
                  13 December 2011 19: 40
                  since then he’s on a well-deserved rest lol
            2. rysich
              +3
              13 December 2011 17: 59
              People serve in the army not for the sake of "crumbs from the table", they are the first to go under bullets, but people like you sold cartridges to Chechens, etc. You don't touch the officers, you brat
              1. that
                -6
                13 December 2011 19: 04
                I'm talking about policemen
                snot rub it yourself
                I have long been on a well-deserved vacation
                1. +1
                  13 December 2011 19: 26
                  Quote: ki
                  I'm talking about policemen

                  Over 200 employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs have died since the beginning of the year on duty
                  is it enough for their children to wives to parents to say this in person? !!
                2. rysich
                  +1
                  13 December 2011 22: 35
                  No offense, what or where did you deserve it? The picture is not painfully adult.
            3. +2
              13 December 2011 19: 20
              my sweetheart, and you saw those "grandmothers", the atom will be an ancdote, as in his time the pale spirochete of the Russian crap Sakhorov told how a paratrooper drove a grandmother for three kilometers until she fell into the bushes, where he beat her to death with a sapper paw, after all scoundrel (I'm talking about the paratrooper smile )
          2. +2
            13 December 2011 19: 18
            leave the village alone, it’s very asphalted and judging by the fact that I’m not there yet smile
        2. Anatoly
          +3
          13 December 2011 18: 07
          Did he ruin it? I do not block Vovka in any way, but remember in what condition he got the country, after Boris! What the economy, that the military-industrial complex! .... everything was in the deep ..... .....!
          1. that
            -2
            13 December 2011 19: 06
            and he served with ebn wink
            in the FSB and was in the know about everything
        3. +1
          13 December 2011 19: 18
          and more specifically, somehow the army and navy are very generalized, without specifics, without numbers.
    2. that
      0
      13 December 2011 16: 50
      army and navy
      and developed meeeveda --- where did you serve wink
  18. gloster65
    0
    14 December 2011 08: 59
    Ivashov is an intelligent man, well done, that he is going to swamp for the presidency)))

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"