Composite materials will be widely used in the construction of 5-generation submarines

59
Russian submarines of the 5 generation will be built from new composite materials that will noticeably reduce their visibility, reports RIA News report of Valery Polovinkin, advisor to the general director of the Krylovsky State Research Center enterprise.



“We are talking about new multi-layer composite materials. Their structure and composition reduces the reflected sonar signals from a submarine, prevents the spread of vibration from working mechanisms, and so on, ”said Polovinkin.

According to the advisor, “the enemy simply will not receive the signal reflected from the submarine of the required level, since the composite material has a high internal loss factor, or sound absorption, can change properties when vibration occurs, completely preventing the propagation of vibrational energy.”

“The use of such composites in the design of submarines allows not only to reduce weight and increase reliability, but also to reduce operating costs, since composites do not require painting and do not corrode. In addition, structures of this type can be manufactured in one technological process, which reduces the laboriousness of manufacturing body parts or mechanism assemblies at 30 – 40% ”, - he explained.

Some products created on the basis of composites, already undergo bench tests. “The first adaptive composite propeller can be submitted to full-scale tests already in the 2018 year,” said Polovinkin.

“This is one of the most promising works of our institute. This direction ensures a reduction in the level of vibration of the blades and an increase in the efficiency of the screws. Due to various effects, the acoustic field of the ship will be improved. By creating a new material structure, the blade will adapt to the flow around the hydrodynamic flow, depending on the speed, ”he said.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    17 March 2016 11: 03
    Composite materials will be widely used in the construction of 5-generation submarines

    In fact, they have been used there for a long time. Take at least a solid outer rubber coating of the hull of a submarine. (that's why they are black).
    In general, the transition to composites is a general trend in military affairs. Our submarines always did well. I wish good luck to our engineers, and to the factories building up the necessary capacities good
    1. Mobius
      +3
      17 March 2016 11: 13
      Russian submarines of the 5th generation will be built from new composite materials, which will significantly reduce their visibility, reports RIA Novosti a message from the adviser to the general director of the enterprise Krylovsky State Scientific Center Valery Polovinkin.


      I wonder if there are currently materials and technologies that allow WHOLE "glue" the solid hull of a class submarine ... for example, "missile carrier"?

      Deliberately emphasized the class of the ship, since the small class submarines made of "plastic" have existed for a long time.
      1. +1
        17 March 2016 11: 34
        Then first you need to build autoclaves of the appropriate size!
        1. avt
          +2
          17 March 2016 11: 59
          Quote: Tol100v
          Then first you need to build autoclaves of the appropriate size!

          No. 3D printers.
          1. Mobius
            +3
            17 March 2016 12: 04
            Quote: avt
            3D printers.

            Why not ? Technology is of course still in its infancy, but in the long run ...

            Quote: Tol100v
            Then first you need to build autoclaves of the appropriate size!

            In "autoclaves" or, for example, in "vacuum chambers", SECTIONS of cases could be "baked", right?
            Indeed, just like that, now welding of submarine cases from sections with the parallel installation of large-modular equipment is being performed.

            With the subsequent connection "together". Nobody is pushing on "pasting" a solid "monocoque".

            Although, perhaps, the engineers are bold and such.
            1. avt
              +2
              17 March 2016 12: 06
              Quote: Möbius
              Why not ?

              But I wasn’t joking.
              1. Mobius
                +1
                17 March 2016 12: 28
                Quote: avt
                But I wasn’t joking.


                And I put you a "plus" in earnest ...
          2. gjv
            0
            17 March 2016 12: 08
            Quote: avt
            3D printers

            Quote: Tol100v
            appropriate sizes!

            More submarine! How much will the printer be built ?! bully
            1. Mobius
              +1
              17 March 2016 12: 31
              Quote: gjv
              More submarine! How much will the printer be built ?!


              Oh, how many wonderful discoveries to us
              Prepare an enlightened spirit,
              And the experience of the son of errors difficult,
              And genius, the paradoxes friend
              And the case, god is the inventor.
              Pushkin
            2. +2
              17 March 2016 13: 52
              Quote: gjv
              More submarine! How much will the printer be built ?!

              And more is not necessary. An AM machine (3D printer) does not have to be larger than the manufactured product.
              But the principles of design and production will have to fundamentally change. Even the economic model of production will have to be changed. And simple things will happen:
              1. The share of intellectual labor will become overwhelming (above 90%), and only highly qualified engineers will be involved in production;
              2. The complexity of product design will be increased significantly, and it will become easier to make individual solutions "for the task".
              3. It quickly becomes clear that not all engineers are capable of creating constantly new products under given conditions, but only engineers with creative abilities.
              And then a childishly simple question: WHERE WILL THE "Tvortsy" ENGINEERS COME FROM AT THIS PRODUCTION AND WHY WILL THEY BE INTERESTED IN WORKING AT THIS PRODUCTION ???
              The simple question is true?
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        17 March 2016 12: 08
        It is interesting how the "plastic" of a solid case (even small submarines) can hold such considerable external pressure. Are there any links on the topic?
        1. +4
          17 March 2016 13: 09
          While the cousin was alive, the designer of the submarine (corps) spoke about the double and triple cases with an intermediate power frame, the model models from the composite were already glued. And my grandfather has not been there for 14 years. Already then they thought about this.
        2. Mobius
          0
          17 March 2016 13: 42
          Quote: 955535
          It is interesting how the "plastic" of a solid case (even small submarines) can hold such considerable external pressure. Are there any links on the topic?


          There are no links.
          I myself ask a question, but not the strength characteristics of modern composites, which in many cases are superior to steel and titanium, but the technological and PRICE side of this matter ...
          1. 0
            17 March 2016 14: 31
            Quote: Möbius
            The PRICE side of this business ...

            You are very wrong. You are wrong because prices are artificially kept high by material manufacturers to justify "development costs". In fact, often these are not even their developments, but patents are the result of the work of lawyers, and not the result of research.
            As for the materials produced in Russia, this is not their development at all, but the legacy of Soviet research institutes.
            1. Mobius
              0
              17 March 2016 21: 59
              Quote: Concealer
              You are very wrong. You are wrong because prices are artificially kept high by material manufacturers to justify "development costs".


              I am not mistaken, but ask a question.
        3. 0
          17 March 2016 14: 22
          Have you seen the characteristics of modern plastics? For example, polyetherketone (PEEK).
          And what about modern industrial printers? For example - EOSINT P800 (it is for PEEK).
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. 0
        17 March 2016 17: 53
        Quote: Möbius
        I wonder if there are currently materials and technologies that allow WHOLE "glue" the solid hull of a class submarine ... for example, a "missile carrier"?

        No, it doesn't exist. It is impossible to "glue" the body, you can make coatings and separate monolithic parts. Or non-compressive structures inside a robust housing.
        There are separate technologies for "baked" materials, polyethylene, polycarbonate, I don’t know if they can make cases from them.
      6. 0
        17 March 2016 22: 22
        Quote: Möbius
        I wonder if there are currently materials and technologies that allow WHOLE "glue" the solid hull of a class submarine ... for example, a "missile carrier"?



        And when a crack or hole appears, the boat immediately into the scrap?
    2. +2
      17 March 2016 11: 17
      The "advanced" West, where the United States is at the head of the gang, is losing more and more the desire to get involved with Russia! So much for a cowardly democracy in the American way .... the silushka is a heroic hosh-nehosh, but you will have to respect !!!!!
    3. +5
      17 March 2016 11: 21
      On old boats there is no rubber, but they are still black
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        17 March 2016 12: 04
        On old boats there is no rubber, but they are still black

        Old boats were simply painted black (or gray). But those types of boats that are now in service seem to all have a rubber coating on the hull.
    4. 0
      17 March 2016 11: 32
      And what, rubber only black happens?
      1. Mobius
        0
        17 March 2016 13: 11
        Quote: kizhe
        And what, rubber only black happens?

        Of course not. But the one that goes to the "finishing" of the light hull of our submarines, namely the "RADICAL BLACK COLOR" ...

        The "tiles" are clearly visible in the photo.
    5. +3
      17 March 2016 11: 44
      Source: Husky submarines will be armed with Zircon hypersonic missiles

      The newest Russian multipurpose nuclear submarines (nuclear submarines) of the fifth generation of the "Husky" class will be armed with hypersonic cruise missiles "Zircon", a high-ranking official of the military-industrial complex (MIC) told RIA Novosti on Thursday.

      "The Husky nuclear submarine project is currently under development at the Malakhit design bureau. These submarines will be armed with Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles, the tests of which have already begun," the agency's source said.
      1. Mobius
        +3
        17 March 2016 11: 57
        Quote: st25310
        Source: Husky submarines will be armed with Zircon hypersonic missiles


        Quote: Limon1972
        A beautiful picture


        Puppies will someday grow up.
    6. 0
      17 March 2016 12: 39
      "Actually, they have been used there for a long time." Perhaps you have no idea - HOW long ago .... And, in general, the Germans were the "pioneers" here: "Since the end of 1944, the lining of the hulls of the XXIII series boats with the Alberich antihydrolocation coating was started, which received its name in honor of the owner of the hat. Invisibles from the legend of the Nibelungs. The coating consisted of rubber sheets 4 mm thick with internal air cavities (horns) and provided a decrease in the level of the reflected echo. By the beginning of 1944, the specialists of the IG Farbenindustrie concern had solved the technological problems of coating. " : //putnikost.gorod.tomsk.ru/index-1276526239.php It was this coating that formed the basis for the use of analogs, naturally modified "in the submarine of the USSR.
      And the fact that "in general" composites are in trend is absolutely true, "... and so on," Polovinkin said. " There is a natural desire - to clarify what is actually meant by "... and so on." Forming a durable feed from a "composite" ...? I don’t know, I don’t know .... Light body? Probably and most likely ALREADY possible ..., separate elements.
      1. Mobius
        0
        17 March 2016 13: 22
        Quote: sub307
        : "Since the end of 1944, the cladding of the hulls of the XXIII series boats with the Alberich antihydrolocation coating was started, which received its name in honor of the owner of the invisibility cap from the legend of the Nibelungs. 4 mm thick rubber sheets with internal air cavities (horns) and provided a decrease in the level of the reflected echo signal.


        Something similar has been applied (applied? request ) and on our submarines, also rubber with "horns", only the thickness of the coating is a few centimeters ...
    7. 0
      17 March 2016 12: 55
      And here is some very interesting news:
      The first tests of the sea-based Zircon hypersonic cruise missile began in Russia, a senior representative of the military-industrial complex told RIA Novosti on Thursday.
      "The Zircon hypersonic missiles are already in metal, and their tests have begun from the ground launch complex," the agency's source said.

      According to him, the speed of the rocket should be about 5-6 Mach (Mach number means the speed of sound).

      The Zircon missiles will be installed on the fifth generation Husky nuclear submarines. The Malakhit design bureau is developing the latest Russian multipurpose nuclear submarines, the source said.
  2. 0
    17 March 2016 11: 07
    Well, they put the radar there on the photonic.
  3. 0
    17 March 2016 11: 07
    A beautiful picture, class good
  4. +1
    17 March 2016 11: 07
    It turns out we started, so we determine the performance of the 5th generation submarine. Amers now urgently need to pull up and develop their submarine, swell $ 2 trillion into development, and create a miserable semblance ...
    1. -2
      17 March 2016 11: 10
      Quote: Saffron
      Amers now urgently need to pull up and develop their submarine, swell $ 2 trillion into development, and create a miserable semblance ...

      Well, as always lol Ameropopil drives good
    2. +3
      17 March 2016 11: 10
      It turns out we started, then we determine the performance of the 5 generation submarine

      Sorry, what have we started, if not secret?
      1. +1
        17 March 2016 11: 36
        It's just a secret wink
        1. gjv
          +1
          17 March 2016 12: 15
          Quote: LVMI1980
          It's just a secret

          "Secret" secret ... bully
          In the exposition of the Krylovsky Center, full-scale samples of products made of composite materials were presented, which can be widely used not only in shipbuilding, but also in structural mechanics, and various fields of mechanical engineering. Among them:
          outer sheathing of the superstructure of the vessel in the form of a three-layer panel manufactured by the method of vacuum injection in one technological process;
          vibration isolating coupling for use in ship propulsion complexes, pump and compressor stations, power generating sets;
          a fragment of the panel for use as the walls of superstructures and deckhouses made by vacuum injection in one process;
          deck overlapping of a three-layer flooring with homogeneous aggregate for the construction of ship decks and platforms, decking of piers and mooring walls, bridges, floors of buildings and structures.

          vibration-isolating coupling is an interesting product; it may be relevant for sub-bus radar helicopters.
          1. +1
            17 March 2016 12: 40
            may be relevant for overhead helicopter radar

            Yeah! How many conjure with the Mi-28 radar, and things are still there - they cannot solve the problem of vibration protection. Rumor has it that the issue is being resolved through deep modernization, but nobody needs it, an extra expensive mess. Moreover, orders for a helicopter, and so it is ...request
            1. +1
              17 March 2016 12: 57
              The question is what causes vibrations? But hardly anyone wants to hear, much less understand the solutions to this problem.
              1. 0
                17 March 2016 13: 46
                The question is what causes vibrations.

                I repeat, the reason has long been known - this is a structural feature of the rotor, or rather, serious vibrations of this node. The solution is a substantial revision of the design, but this is not an expensive business.
                hi
                1. +1
                  17 March 2016 15: 26
                  Sorry, but I have a radically different opinion. Do you know why the tips of the rotor blades glow? Therefore, the higher the rotation speed, the more problems and constructively modernizing the blades the issue is not solved. This is one hundred percent!
    3. +3
      17 March 2016 11: 47
      The US has very good submarines. If the Russian commander of the submarine thinks that American boats are a miserable semblance ... then he will lose in the submarine war, ditch the team, his submarine and himself.
  5. +2
    17 March 2016 11: 09
    Russia is making a technological breakthrough in a very timely manner. And whoever says anything about unprofitable domestic politics, all the same, achievements are real. One Crimea is worth it! External authority is also not subject to dispute. There will be time will be an internal shift in improvement. The level of not only military equipment, but also the life of citizens will rise to the fifth generation! wassat
    1. VP
      +2
      17 March 2016 11: 45
      I don’t see any jerk so far, I only see words about the test of the screw, moreover the bench, not the chassis.
      1. +1
        17 March 2016 12: 33
        And I see a huge jerk! In addition to reducing the cost of the propulsion (screw) itself, the use of composites promises another important plus. This is a wonderful material that resists cavitation very well! And cavitation is a process that destroys any screw from any metal (or alloy). Moreover, these cavitation-resistant alloys are very expensive. Today, more and more often in production, impellers of pumps are not made of bronze / brass, but plastic. Cheap and cheerful! With less maintainability (it doesn’t exist here at all), maintenance is simplified: the pump has broken down - replacement with a new one (since the cost of the pump is low). Advantages are undoubted: durability and low cost. I have not yet met large propulsion devices from composites, so there is a real breakthrough if everything works out by 2018.
        1. VP
          0
          17 March 2016 12: 49
          While there is nothing, there is only an idea that they are trying to test. About whether there is a breakthrough or not, it will be possible to speak only after 2018 when field tests will go, if it comes to them.
        2. +1
          17 March 2016 12: 54
          Cavitation processes do not destroy the entire surface of the outflow, but only regularly determined areas. Therefore, an increase in the velocity and pressure of the outflow only increases the destructive effect both in the depth of the surface of the blade and in area. But it is important to understand. which cavitates not the entire volume of the flow in the areas of destruction, but only its small part. Therefore, the new and proposed technology allows not only to increase the volume of cavitating flow, but also the speed of such a newly incoming flow under cavitation. The question, after all, is that the cavitation zone is simply displayed outside the surface and is located in a separate part, which only contacts the blades on a very narrow edge. In this case, another part of the rotating flow with maximum speed breaks this cavitating flow. Everyone is struggling with cavitation, but it can and should be used. In this case, you need to understand what cavitation is and what is its derivative. And this is a separate issue, which ultimately leads us to the fact that hydrocarbon fuel becomes useless.
          1. 0
            17 March 2016 14: 07
            The beginning of the comment is interesting, since I know very well what cavitation is and where it takes place to be. But the ending is just nonsense! How can cavitation be attracted to hydrocarbon fuel? You want to say that, for example, a screw on a solar powered yacht does not cavitate? More in detail from now on?
            I believe that cavitation does not have a positive result, if it takes place to be on the mover of the submarine. Since when the vapor bubbles soak, energy is released. So, the corresponding noise background is added, which allows you to determine the location of the submarine.
            1. 0
              17 March 2016 15: 47
              if I answer you completely describing the cavitation process, then you will receive an answer how to solve this problem. Therefore, I will only say that cavitation processes are primarily energy. And these energy processes are orders of magnitude higher than the compression and combustion of hydrocarbons. Therefore, cavitation is very easy to use to transform water, especially sea water, so that it "burns". The background noise is another matter. Therefore, the propellers can be easily installed not in an open environment, but in any part of the hull inside. And even if such an effect will have at least some place, then oxygen-free power plants and the propellers themselves will simply work at low speeds. The main thing is that they are energetically orders of magnitude more efficient than any of the screws.
              The issue of connecting the solar battery and the propeller is that the power consumption of the new device radically changes the arrangement of the issue of energy consumption and energy efficiency. With an increase in rotation speed, a screw consumes proportionally more energy, and a new device, on the contrary, with an increase in rotation speed, the energy output on the rotor shaft increases by orders of magnitude. And from the critical moment, depending on the properties of the flow of the outflow, it generally turns into an engine with an "external combustion chamber", so to speak. And even these cavitation process sections in the flow convert the kinetic energy of the flow into an even higher-energy process.
              Even with about 10000 rpm on the motor shaft, the device produced practically no perceived sounds, except for the hum of the bearings. But there is a cardinal decision on the issue of the bearing, so that it is really "eternal" and with the accepted loads an order of magnitude higher.
              In general, cavitation is characterized by regular algorithms of the process itself. In addition, it is a continuation of the turbulence phase. And also cavitation processes are a prerequisite for the next stage. Another thing is that they are fast-occurring, if not super-fast-flowing. But the well-known properties and prerequisites of cavitation allow it to be used with very great benefit.
              1. +1
                17 March 2016 19: 22
                Yeah, I see that you have top-secret knowledge on the separation of water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen, which would then burn hydrogen in oxygen. That is, mankind has been struggling with the problem of cavitation for more than a dozen years, solving the problems associated with it, and you have an answer how to use it to turn water into fuel! The whole World is anxiously frozen and expects from you this undeniably archival discovery, which will stand on the same shelf with a wheel and penicillin! What then for implementation delays?
                Here in the article we are talking about replacing the material of the propulsion (screw) with composites and nothing more. There is no talk of any new ways of splitting water or creating a fundamentally new type of engine / mover.
                Can share a link with proofs, what is possible even in theory?
                1. 0
                  17 March 2016 19: 53
                  I feel sarcasm. However, the solutions are so obvious that, as they say, they do not go crazy for so long that I do not understand what the conversation is about. Moreover, it is the use of composite materials with correctly positioned carbon fiber filaments that can be of great importance for the shift of the area of ​​cavitation destruction. Again, I'm simultaneously talking about all modern innovations in this topic as transitional stages that you can skip and immediately use a full-fledged technology. Sorry, but I won't talk about the theoretical foundations anymore. All these are methods of analyzing complex physical processes. And everyone who wants to at least approach this needs to understand simple things, that "everything and everything" has its place and meaning in the algorithm of the dynamically occurring processes. In any case, there is a fairly comprehensive and complete theoretical substantiation of the proposed control technologies for physical. process and the device itself.
            2. +1
              17 March 2016 21: 47
              Do not feed this troll, I myself sometimes break down, but not necessary, by golly. These pseudo-scientific reasoning have nothing under themselves, but the fact of attention and dialogue is more important to him - it’s clear that there’s no one to talk to, not grandmothers at the entrance. I also notice after myself that I started talking to the saleswomen - it happens, age ...
              1. -1
                17 March 2016 22: 13
                There is such a thing as sabotage. There are also criminals who, through their inaction, create consequences that lead to disastrous results. Therefore, I appeal to those who really are not indifferent for the future of their country. Understanding many processes comes with time. Such as a direct assault on this future.
              2. -1
                17 March 2016 22: 25
                Quote: alex86
                Do not feed this troll, I myself sometimes break down, but not necessary, by golly. These pseudo-scientific reasoning have nothing under themselves, but the fact of attention and dialogue is more important to him - it’s clear that there’s no one to talk to, not grandmothers at the entrance. I also notice after myself that I started talking to the saleswomen - it happens, age ...

                There is no doubt that you are a saboteur and there is a good example of this. I have repeatedly spoken about the impossibility of overcoming problems when achieving hypersonic flight by simple searches for suitable material. And they already openly write that in the lower layers of the atmosphere such flights are accompanied by an increase in the temperature of the hull over 1000 degrees and the appearance of wave oscillations on the surface. And I am discussing specific methods and methods that will allow us to overcome even higher flight speeds. You are just a squabbler and haven’t suggested a single rational thought. You are not even able to reason. Let others draw conclusions.
              3. +1
                18 March 2016 11: 07
                In no case do not feed. I understand him perfectly. Indeed, such inventors who are ahead of their time usually disappear. I personally saw a working Meyer cell, where and when - I won’t say, live hunting :). But, without proofs, you can believe a word, or you can not believe it. By cell you can find a lot of information on the Internet. I ask for a reference to the information about cavitation and a new type of engine, but somehow so far to no avail what .
                1. -1
                  18 March 2016 15: 11
                  You see, but the question is that there are peak design ones. This is the creation of ultra-fast electric motors. The task of creating an object capable of flying at hyperspeed. Problems of processing large information data arrays, etc. In general, all tasks associated with overcoming a certain line of transience. In this regard, it is probably worth saying that any inventions that are positioned as based on new physical principles look stupid. But if we talk about new algorithms for organizing such physical processes, then this will be more true. Because in order to invent something fundamental, it is necessary to have new fundamental foundations for such creations. In general, the crafty of the genius inventors can be determined immediately and unconditionally by what theoretical foundations are embedded in the process that is provided by the device. For example, what kind of ionic space engine can we talk about if there is no energy source of this level? Where is the growth potential and is there a reserve of this energy? Where are the processes for managing the density of this energy? All this is not. The same can be said about hyperspeed flight objects. Of course, you can reach it for a couple of seconds. But this is not serious! And so on. Therefore, from what has been said "it follows" that even a simple idea is very important, at least, to move somewhere. We are talking about a principally new method of analyzing high-volume and fast-occurring, if I may say so, processes. We fully substantiate the reasons for effective work, namely devices, on the basis of new process algorithms in which the initial concepts remain the same. The device itself is simple and technologically not difficult to reproduce. With all this, it provides a completely new quality of the result that we get.
                  In this light, can we talk about the public availability of such information to everyone? In principle, all scientific and technical intelligence of the world is chasing such information. Just everyone can not believe that it is so close and accessible to those who behave correctly.
                  I repeat once again, we do not give a complete and exhaustive solution, but we give that path of searching and already developing and mastering what is known. And this path has the potential for development much further and deeper than everything that science has at the moment. So sorry, but I am the source and there are no links. This is nowhere to be found and will not be popularized. I understand that I am walking on a "razor's edge". If they do not destroy those to whom I am standing in the throat, then they will destroy those to whom I do not get. I bow for this. Respectfully the one who does not live long.
    2. +1
      17 March 2016 11: 53
      Not for everyone and not for everyone.
  6. gjv
    +1
    17 March 2016 11: 15
    Due to the creation of a new material structure, the blade will adapt to the flowing hydrodynamic flow depending on the speed

    The phenomenon is probably poorly understood and therefore very dangerous. I remember how a cyclist was broken on "super-duper" composite spokes. The spokes were cut with transversely flying small pebbles and twigs, of which there are a lot on the road. As a result, an instant loss of longitudinal strength, the dude has multiple severe fractures.
    Composites are certainly not susceptible to oxidative corrosion, but delamination and microcracks are unlikely to be avoided.
    In this regard, the statement by the French about the combat readiness of only 20 Rafalees is interesting. Someone knows, is it because of problems with composite body parts?
    1. -4
      17 March 2016 12: 20
      In the struggle of the temptation to share information with the fact that common sense still wins, nevertheless it is possible to say and repeat that some constructive solutions can radically change the essence of the whole process on the rotor blades. It turns out a completely different physical process, which allows you to use the energy of the pressure vector and the energy of the centrifugal process and the potential energy of the flow substance.
      It is impossible to break through to designers and developers. They are closed from any contact. Scientific and technical intelligence is not at all interested, since the questions relate to the fundamental foundations and no one has encountered such solutions before. In general, a complete dead end. Therefore, I participate in such meaningless forums. Maybe I think at least someone perspicacious there.
      Ultimately, I can say that the use of composite materials on the propeller blades only aggravates the situation. The lack of understanding of the essence of the processes of ionization of the surfaces of the outflow by the hydro-gas-dynamic flow also corresponds to the ways of finding solutions, which will still lead to "nothing".
      Discussions on theoretical issues do not give an opportunity or a chance to be heard. Obviously a complete lack of tact and tolerance, and ultimately, rationality in the dialogues. Therefore, I only say that such a constructive solution is real and obvious, and this is actually a new basis for creating engines of the future with a new order of traction levels and the absence of a proportional dependence on fuel consumption.
  7. +5
    17 March 2016 11: 16
    Another wave to start up the body, like a dolphin ........ A seventh generation biomaterial coating will probably be. If the "ball" is not ruined by this time.
    The skin of dolphins is a miracle of nature, they are able to dampen the turbulence of water at the surface of a rapidly swimming body, reducing the speed of movement - the designers of submarines learned from dolphins, creating artificial skins for submarines. And the dolphin’s skin sensation to the touch is quite unusual, and it also brings joy: it looks as thick as plastic, and when you palm it is tender and soft, it seems thin silk.
    1. 0
      17 March 2016 20: 05
      Any physicist should know that at high speeds of rotation of a simple disk (of any material), the disk begins to bend according to algorithms. And in the end, trying to form collapses. Everything is quite clear for smart scientists who "read" the process. And of course the blind do not understand the reasons for this phenomenon. Therefore, the reasons for the wave along the midline of the body of the same dolphin are completely understandable. Such waves not only dampen cavitation, but harmonize the process of water flowing onto the surface.
  8. +1
    17 March 2016 11: 19
    The news is far from the first freshness. It would be better to say when we begin to build these very submarines, otherwise we praised and praise everything ...
  9. +1
    17 March 2016 11: 20
    Composite materials will be widely used in the construction of 5-generation submarines
    Science does not stand still, good luck and success to our designers and engineers.
  10. +3
    17 March 2016 11: 20
    Everyone already understands that the future lies with composite materials. Therefore, it’s a shame that hydrocarbon raw materials, as the main component, are sold abroad for free.
  11. UVB
    +3
    17 March 2016 11: 20
    “The first adaptive composite propeller can be submitted for full-scale testing as early as 2018”
    The composite case is quite expected, but the composite screw is news! At least for the first time I found out about this.
  12. +2
    17 March 2016 11: 53
    In the meantime, at least put all the planned "Ash" in operation, and 6 "Varshavyanka" in the Pacific Fleet, and that is completely dull! Well, we love to dream! Brevity and surprise of the sister of victory!
  13. +1
    17 March 2016 11: 54
    And they will also be armed with Zircon hypersonic missiles.

    MOSCOW, 17 Mar - RIA Novosti. The newest Russian multipurpose nuclear submarines (nuclear submarines) of the fifth generation of the "Husky" class will be armed with hypersonic cruise missiles "Zircon", a high-ranking official of the military-industrial complex (MIC) told RIA Novosti on Thursday.
    "The Husky nuclear submarine project is currently under development at the Malakhit design bureau. These submarines will be armed with Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles, the tests of which have already begun," the agency's source said.

    The speed of the Zircon missiles should reach 5-6M (M is the speed of sound).
  14. 0
    17 March 2016 11: 55
    MOSCOW, 17 Mar - RIA Novosti. The first tests of the sea-based Zircon hypersonic cruise missile began in Russia, a senior representative of the military-industrial complex told RIA Novosti on Thursday.
    "The Zircon hypersonic missiles are already in metal, and their tests have begun from the ground launch complex," the agency's source said.

    According to him, the speed of the rocket should be about 5-6 Mach (Mach number means the speed of sound).

    The Zircon missiles will be installed on the fifth generation Husky nuclear submarines. The Malakhit design bureau is developing the newest Russian multipurpose nuclear submarines, the source said.
  15. 0
    17 March 2016 11: 58
    5-6 Mach is 7000 km / h

    Well then, the usual gas station news ..))
  16. 0
    17 March 2016 12: 03
    It will be great if the hull of the submarine takes on the color of the environment, the so-called chameleon principle. Although on land at least in the sea, in winter and summer in its own color. To “Composers”, good luck in writing “operas and operet”!
    1. +1
      17 March 2016 12: 15
      what for? I understand this is very promising for the Earth forces, but how relevant is it for apl?)

      interesting news, pleased with the information about the composite screw. Good luck to the designers! Composites hide many more secrets and there is room to grow. I wonder if I will live to see the day when the Apple corps is also made of composites?
  17. +1
    17 March 2016 13: 37
    first, they will break in on boxes and closures for shells, and then they will turn to serious things
    1. 0
      17 March 2016 13: 52
      + you!) "subtly" noticed)))
  18. +2
    17 March 2016 16: 11
    Composite materials have been used in military technology for over 40 years, especially in aircraft and rocket science. One problem, poor maintainability, if you can put a patch on a duralumin, well, let's say the wing was shot, then the patch on plastic is difficult to put. And if the bundle, then a complete replacement is needed. But maybe they’ve come up with something new, I don’t know.
  19. The comment was deleted.