God help you, Mr. Obama!

263
From January 2015 to January 2016, Russia increased its investment in US government securities by 14,7 billion dollars (from 82,2 billion to 96,9 billion dollars). This was reported in the January report of the US Treasury Department on other countries investing funds in US government bonds. Russia ranks fifteenth in the list of US securities holders. The number one investor is China.



As transmits TASS, for the period from January 2015 to January 2016. The Russian Federation increased its investment in US government securities by 14,7 billion dollars (from $ 82,2 billion to $ 96,9 billion). This is reported in the US Department of the Treasury’s monthly monthly report (2016 for January) on other countries ’investment in US government bonds.

It is noted that Russian investments in American securities began to decline since December 2014, but the trend reversed in May 2015, when the corresponding figure rose from April 66,5 billion dollars to 70,6 billion dollars.

TASS recalls that Russia occupies 15-place in the common list of creditors of the United States. China remains the main holder of US government securities. In January, 2016, its investments reached 1,237 trillion. dollars. In second place - Japan (1,123 trillion. dollars).

Readers of the Military Review are often wondering: why is the Russian Central Bank investing in a foreign economy, and even a “hostile” pressure on Russia with sanctions? Why not spend this money on the development of its own industry? Some people see in these actions of the Central Bank the intrigues of the “fifth column” and “enemies of the people” and wonder: why does Putin not see all this? And if he sees, why is he "satisfied" with the work of the Central Bank, and in general, the economic bloc of the government?

Different politicians are asking the same questions, which, however, are not limited to online forums, but begin to give instructions to the Central Bank and the Kremlin and pave the way for a bright future for the people. On this path, the Liberal Democratic Party, the Communists, and smaller forces, who also want to draw attention to themselves, have already become familiar. In principle, at their core, many of the statements of these home-grown advisers are nothing but attempts at self-promotion that do not lead to any changes. By changing the policy of the Central Bank of these "tips" certainly will not.

A month ago, in February 2016, the LDPR faction in the State Duma appealed to the leadership of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation to clarify the policy of purchasing US government bonds.

Eldepair people think that by investing money in US government bonds, the Central Bank supports the American economy. Consequently, the leadership of the Bank of Russia must appear at a meeting in the State Duma and explain the meaning of their actions. About this, as reported RIA News", declared at the plenary meeting, the deputy from the LDPR Alexander Starovoytov.

According to him, in December 2015, compared with November, Russia increased its investment in US government bonds by 4,6% (up to 92,1 billion dollars). “In November, this happened in the amount of 6 billion dollars. Probably, for some, these are empty numbers, but a small comparison: these amounts for two months are equivalent to the planned expenses of the state to support the economy of the Russian Federation for the entire 2016 year. In particular, by 30% this exceeds the state’s annual expenditures on education, by 54% it exceeds the state’s annual expenditures on health care and by five and a half times the amount spent on housing and public utilities, the parliamentarian said. - What is this action by the Central Bank? Maybe this is a tricky economic trick, maybe they really have the information that it will bring a substantial profit to the country? ”

“The LDPR faction nevertheless insists on reminding the Central Bank that after all this is not some kind of private commercial shop and that decisions of this kind and level are also of a political nature. We insist that in the near future, in the coming days or at least a week, the leadership of the Central Bank will come to the State Duma and tell us about its serious economic plan to support the US economy, ”Mr. Starovoytov demanded.

Earlier, January 26, online "RIA News" it was reported that the Communist Party deputies called for abandoning the purchase of US government bonds.

Deputies from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation Sergei Obukhov and Valery Rashkin sent requests to the government of the Russian Federation and asked to take measures for the early repayment of the public debt of the Russian Federation at the expense of sovereign funds instead of purchasing US Treasury bonds. Requests were sent to Dmitry Medvedev, Anton Siluanov and Elvira Nabiullina.

The communists recalled that in November 2015, when Russia acquired US bonds worth 6 billion, was working on a law on the federal budget for 2016 year, which “provides for an unacceptable reduction in a number of key expenditure items”: health care costs are reduced in nominal terms by 8%, by education - by 8,5% (compared to 2015 year).

"The meaning of our proposal can be expressed in three simple words:" Enough to feed Kansas! "- said the RIA"News»Secretary of the Communist Party Central Committee Obukhov. - The government is outraged by the fact that the United States imposes endless anti-Russian sanctions, but at the same time continues to invest budget funds in their securities. Such a policy clearly does not fit with the application of Russia for genuine sovereignty: if your money is placed in the US, then what kind of independence can we talk about? Moreover, in the event of an exacerbation of the situation, these funds can always freeze. ”

So, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and the Liberal Democratic Party tried on clothes of people's guardians and severely criticized the ideas of the Central Bank and the Russian government in general. No wonder the letter of the Communists went to Medvedev.

How do experts explain this policy of the Central Bank?

“The risk of losing money invested in US Treasury bonds certainly exists,” said "Free Press" Public Relations Director of the Kalita-Finance Financial Group, Alexey Vyazovsky. - In case of tightening of Western sanctions, everything can go according to the Iranian scenario, when the USA arrested all the assets of the Iranian Central Bank. In Europe, financial investments have also been frozen for decades. ”

According to a financial expert, this risk is also considered in the Russian government - “as quite real”, although “they do not advertise it”. “Last year,” the expert recalled, “the financial management of Russia was trying to do something, to get away from this dependence — the gold reserves in the country were increased to record levels.” But then oil prices rose a bit, a stream of foreign exchange earnings went into the country, and the government "did not think of anything better than how to invest it in US bonds."

“The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money. For example, out of 90 billions of dollars invested in US public debt, a third is derived and invested in the purchase of gold. This will immediately cause a serious increase in gold prices.

Only by this I can explain this strange behavior of our authorities. Because, based on normal logic, we must minimize our dependence on the financial systems of those countries that impose sanctions against Russia as much as possible. ”


Dmitry Abzalov, President of the Center for Strategic Communications, expressed his opinion on the “arrest” and “freezing” in an interview with “SP”.

“The risk of losing money invested in Tresuries is small,” he noted. - This system is so arranged that it is very difficult to freeze the assets of one of the depositing countries so that the assets of others do not suffer. And if China, the largest contributor to US Treasury bonds, starts to withdraw it because of the threat of losing money, this is fraught with the collapse of the entire US financial system. ”

To the question of the correspondent, “But did Iran’s investments freeze at one time?” The expert answered: “Nothing of the kind. Frozen assets. And investing in US Treasury bonds is very difficult to freeze. ”

According to the expert, in Russia it is necessary to create financial instruments and to invest normally in our economy, in infrastructure projects. If, however, we finance them directly, “there may be big costs,” namely, the “corruption component”. “If the funds will be allocated just for the state-owned company, then it is likely that the money, let's say, will be spent inefficiently,” the expert gently remarked.

We can assume, let us add, that the state is afraid of corruption ... in the state. Fearing himself, the state invests currency in a foreign economy, and invests so that the risk is minimal. Therefore, the American economy is elected - the most transparent.

In addition, the US paper has the highest degree of reliability.

US state bonds are the most common tool for the formation of foreign exchange reserves worldwide, said Artem Zvyagilsky, a leading analyst at MFX Broker. They are nominated in the main currency of international payments, have high reliability and liquidity, leads his words Utro.ru.

“According to the criterion of reliability - the yield is better than the US government’s state securities for placing large reserves is difficult to find,” Sergey Hestanov, associate professor of the Department of Stock Markets and Financial Engineering of the Faculty of Finance and Banking of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Services, confirms this view.

In addition, taking into account the global trend for the growth of the dollar against other currencies, the purchase of US bonds is an absolutely reasonable step, believes Pavel Khoroshilov, leading specialist of the department for attracting and allocating resources to Alor Broker.

American public debt is one of the most reliable financial instruments, which simply have no alternatives, said Vladislav Kochetkov, president of the Finam investment holding. “Of course, the Russian government, based on a conservative investment strategy, has placed its reserves in US bonds, bonds, for many years in a row,” the expert said Reedus.

Buying American bonds, Russia lends America and “holds on a hook” the strongest economy in the world. In addition, Russia receives a fixed income in foreign currency. “Thus, Russia not only maintains its own foreign exchange reserves, but also increases them,” Kochetkov summarizes.

So, we note in conclusion that the basis for the relevant decisions of the Central Bank is the reliability and liquidity of American securities. Apparently, this is well understood, not only in Russia, but also in China, and in Japan, whose investments in US government bonds exceed a trillion.

Moscow’s investment of currency in the home economy will most likely lead to a new round of corruption, rather than to the development of domestic economy and industry. At least some experts think so.

So, we continue to finance the development of the US economy. God help you, Mr. Obama!

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    263 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      18 March 2016 06: 26
      chef! u have gone, the cast is removed, the client is leaving! (c)
      1. +98
        18 March 2016 06: 58
        Moscow’s investment of currency in its native economy will likely lead to a new round of corruption, rather than to the development of the domestic economy and industry

        O. Kh. To have an argument.
        Nabiulina did not come to explain?
        1. +122
          18 March 2016 07: 37
          Quote: sa-zz
          O. Kh. To have an argument.


          What is the state that is afraid to invest in its development because of the fear of theft? belay And the main question is WHAT NEXT? Wait until they stop stealing lol ?
          The impression that everything is left to chance, as it goes, it goes. Neither the will nor the desire to turn the tide, which has already led to Nonsense-to finance Russia its main enemy fool
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. +14
              18 March 2016 08: 08
              Quote: afdjhbn67
              Quote: Aleksander
              What is a state that is afraid to invest in its development because of fear

              Do not rock the boat !!! .... am laughing - gr. bums on galleys rocking ... good

              And nobody shakes. She sways herself. fellow
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. +3
                18 March 2016 10: 01

                This is probably such a cunning weapon - we increase the US public debt so that they collapse faster under the weight of this debt.

                They have to pay interest on debt, which means less remains for their budget

                Something like that ... bully

                1. +12
                  18 March 2016 12: 20
                  It is called :
                  Absurdity and corruption!
                  x / f "DMB"
                2. -7
                  18 March 2016 20: 04
                  Something like that .


                  No, it’s not a percentage point. The fact is that the more the state has more US assets, the weaker the financial pressure mechanisms. So China, one of the largest asset holders. The stocks of green in the Middle Kingdom are such that they are comparable to the cash flow in the United States itself. And the possible application of financial punishment is impossible for China. Moreover, such a scenario would be a terrible dream for the Fed. From this, it turns out that Russia cannot cope with the financial stability of the United States, or at least threaten them, and there are no allies in this. You can try, but this is only to the detriment of yourself, without any result.
                  1. +2
                    20 March 2016 06: 58
                    Well, yes, like give the Gopnik money in "debt", and then command them threatening to ask for money back)))))))))))))))))) Dear are you healthy?
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. +27
                18 March 2016 10: 45
                "The Russian government, proceeding from a conservative investment strategy, has been placing its reserves in American bonds for many years in a row."

                It’s just that the so-called government can’t do anything else. There is not a single person who has worked at least one day in the workplace.
                1. +10
                  18 March 2016 17: 38
                  Yes, the Liberal Democratic Party and the Communists are just right — there are 5 columns in the government, to say ENEMIES! To solve the problem, you need soap, rope, street lights! One such a freak was a hundred years ago, everyone wanted to be outside and above politics, so that the liberal dirt did not concern him ... the result of his reign is millions of victims, the collapse of the country and the death of his and his whole family! GDP evidently also wants to become a saint ... posthumously! ??
                  1. +1
                    18 March 2016 19: 19
                    GDP evidently also wants to become a saint ... posthumously! ?? ,,
                    I’m sorry, I didn’t immediately. Of course, plus-corrected.
                2. +6
                  18 March 2016 21: 48
                  There is not a single person who at least WORKS.
              5. Mobius
                +7
                18 March 2016 10: 57
                By God! The Maidan will ... Fail me in the place where I am sitting laughing
                1. +3
                  18 March 2016 11: 02
                  Quote: Möbius
                  By God! The Maidan will ... Fail me in the place where the sid

                  We have an organization "Antimaydan" and bikers with Herurg. In vain, do they get giants, so that people like you do not think about the Maidans))))
                  1. Mobius
                    +6
                    18 March 2016 11: 13
                    Quote: Al1977
                    We have an organization "Antimaydan" and bikers with Herurg. In vain, do they get giants, so that people like you do not think about the Maidans))))



                    What am I talking about? AT USA , I repeat: B * S O E D E N E N N Y X * SH T A T A X * A M E R IK And because of the investment of $ 5 ...

                    Is there really no sense of humor?
                    1. 0
                      18 March 2016 11: 34
                      Quote: Möbius
                      Quote: Al1977
                      We have an organization "Antimaydan" and bikers with Herurg. In vain, do they get giants, so that people like you do not think about the Maidans))))



                      What am I talking about? AT USA , I repeat: B * S O E D E N E N N Y X * SH T A T A X * A M E R IK And because of the investment of $ 5 ...

                      Is there really no sense of humor?

                      Do you think, without a sense of humor, in principle, this topic can be discussed? Warriors and pensioners talk about financial instruments. How is it possible without a sense of humor?
                  2. +8
                    18 March 2016 19: 46
                    forgive us, but you will forgive me, but you will not go far on patriotism alone, serious changes in the economy are needed, as they say, engage people with decent work and salaries, and then there will be no Maidan, but there are doubts.
              6. The comment was deleted.
            2. +9
              18 March 2016 10: 21
              Quote: Oleg Chuvakin
              Russia receives a fixed income in foreign currency.
              But in more detail, everyone is too shy to talk about the amount of income of this kind, because it is huge.
              1. +8
                18 March 2016 19: 22
                But in more detail, everyone is too shy to talk about the amount of income of this kind, because it is huge. ,,
                and then, there’s no direct force as huge, 0,25-0,5. then lending, 5-8. think about who the government works for.
            3. +9
              18 March 2016 10: 28
              Quote: afdjhbn67
              Quote: Aleksander
              What is a state that is afraid to invest in its development because of fear

              Do not rock the boat !!! .... am laughing - gr. bums on galleys rocking ... good

              Just Putin again outwitted Obama. The White House is in shock. Merkel and Erdogan lost again. Putin leaked them again))))
              1. +9
                18 March 2016 15: 54
                Quote: Al1977
                Just Putin again outwitted Obama. The White House is in shock. Merkel and Erdogan lost again. Putin leaked them again))))

                Frantic pro-Putin cheers-patriots will say so. Why are they already talking ...
          2. -22
            18 March 2016 07: 59
            Krimsonalter just yesterday explained on the fingers why investing in the US public debt is normal. For those who do not understand, but pretend.
            1. +4
              18 March 2016 15: 25
              Quote: baudolino
              yesterday explained on the fingers why investing in the US public debt is normal.

              This is for a similar reason Parashenka rushes around the world and asks for money? He wants to live on the system SAS?
            2. +19
              18 March 2016 17: 19
              Quote: baudolino
              Krimsonalter just yesterday explained on the fingers why investing in the US public debt is normal.

              On the fingers you can explain absolutely anything. And to prove that black is white.
              Not investing in your economy is criminal and no excuses will help.
            3. +5
              18 March 2016 18: 51
              Quote: baudolino
              Krimsonalter just yesterday

              is this the guy who came to GDP after which the Russian Spring and Novorossia disappeared from the president’s rhetoric? wink
          3. +20
            18 March 2016 08: 06
            One can argue on this subject for a very long time, and what is interesting is that the truth will not be found. I am also against feeding sysyya. But if we take seriously the issue of state reserve investments, we must remember that no one stores money in one small egg (except for the doo-ren and Pinocchio who bury). We need gold, and the euro, and the dollar, and the yen, and the pound curse sterling. Therefore, we invest in the Americans. And the deputies would have to think about whether our industry (health care, education, science, production, etc.) can digest such money? Nano led by Chubais did a lot of useful things? Unless to cut and arrange scandals !!! And who, if not our deputies, brought these very industries to such a half-fainting state? It’s time for the State Planning Commission to restore ... Then the matter will be, and control. Yes .... Do not forget to execute embezzlers (pun intended, albeit impromptu)
            1. -11
              18 March 2016 08: 42
              This is the Tatar-Mongol tactic - "one step back, two forward." Therefore, I agree completely. In addition, the US national debt is a highly liquid asset and is suitable as a temporary solution. +
            2. +29
              18 March 2016 08: 43
              Why can’t you lend to your industry? Under the real percentage, under specific projects. Not under 25%, and not Chubais' theft?
              1. -7
                18 March 2016 09: 58
                Because in the first place we need guarantees that the money invested in the economy will really go to the economy, and not to the same currency exchange.
                1. +2
                  18 March 2016 11: 03
                  Quote: lelyk72
                  Because in the first place we need guarantees that the money invested in the economy will really go to the economy, and not to the same currency exchange.

                  Beard, we are not familiar answer me
                2. +6
                  18 March 2016 17: 46
                  No guarantees are needed, but just ONE order on currency control by the CBR! But the raven will not stick his eyes out, and the enemy of Nabiulin will not stop the anti-state financial policy of the Central Bank!
              2. -1
                18 March 2016 10: 24
                Probably because the payback in our industry is 6 years, and money is needed "fast" so they do not invest this, but others are investing in our industry, for example, in the Urals this year, they will open the largest polymer plant in Russia, it will be give taxes about 100 billion rubles a year.
                1. +16
                  18 March 2016 12: 58
                  Quote: Vadim237
                  Probably because the payback of funds in our industry is 6 years, and money is needed "fast" so they do not invest

                  Strange logic, to put it mildly. In your opinion, having money you do not need to invest it in the real economy, because it takes a long time to pay off. But you need to invest in your opponent's bonds to quickly make a profit. And then what? Once again, a situation arises when there is money (according to you "fast money") and again it is not worth investing it in the real economy, and again in US debt to get new fast money ?! And then the same thing - a vicious circle!
                  1. -7
                    18 March 2016 18: 03
                    This is not a strange logic - this is a business, or anything personal.
                    1. +4
                      18 March 2016 19: 28
                      This is not a strange logic - this is a business, or anything personal. ,,
                      a country is not only a business, it needs to be developed. then according to your logic, pensioners, children, disabled people on knives. this is also a business.
                      1. -4
                        19 March 2016 10: 44
                        In a market economy, the country is developing business - projects, financing, investments, construction, and some pensioners are also doing their own thing - they all earn something, including helping people with disabilities, children and everyone else - everything is for money, we have such a World.
                    2. 0
                      23 March 2016 08: 44
                      Quote: Vadim237
                      This is not a strange logic - this is a business, or anything personal.

                      This is not a business, this is speculation and usury. It is about the finances of the state. The state, for a moment, operates with money that was taken from the population and business in the form of taxes, duties, etc. And to give this money to another state, and not the poorest, is criminal. The second point - What moral right now has the government to criticize the population, saving their savings in foreign currency, if the state itself does so?
                  2. 0
                    21 March 2016 16: 18
                    If we understand why this is done, and so we see the first, the second action, we don’t even know the third and subsequent.
                2. +3
                  18 March 2016 15: 59
                  Quote: Vadim237
                  for example in the Urals this year, will open the largest polymer plant in Russia

                  It seems to me that there will be a classic version ... Again, all the polymers are pros.rut (s).
                  1. The comment was deleted.
              3. +17
                18 March 2016 13: 32
                Quote: Beard
                Why can’t you lend to your industry? Under the real percentage, under specific projects. Not under 25%, and not Chubais' theft?

                It is possible, but at first it would be nice to introduce the death penalty for theft on an especially large scale and confiscation of property for corrupt officials and their families.
                Regions in need of developing transport infrastructure, small aircraft and the processing industry are a dime a dozen, but for some reason a reliable haven for money is located in a country that demonstrates a clearly not friendly policy towards Russia.
                What does not allow turning extra money into buying the same machines and technologies and really leading the economy to the notorious import substitution?
                I do not catch up with something ((( request
              4. +5
                18 March 2016 19: 37
                “The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money. Well, exactly, they just know, and to say there is no money, they change money for the so-called. "securities", and now Nabibulina and Siluanov will say like "FSE no money" negative and 90 lards of dead condoms, you will agree a lot fool ,
              5. 0
                19 March 2016 20: 25
                And I’ll remind you, in the USA, a mortgage crisis happened with a mortgage percentage of 2.3-2.5 .. Stupidly the population could not pay these percentages .. We have an average mortgage of 15% .. and what type we will pull and everything will be fine? And this is not with comparable incomes of the population, you’ll forgive me, but in the USA they are higher, despite all taxes, other expenses .. But they couldn’t pay American citizens .. And ours means they can .. This is a matter of patience, the Russian people are the most famous patient, therefore, our bureaucrats believe that 15% is the most..It’s impossible to deceive the figures, and this translates into BIG PROBLEMS .. But our bureaucrats don’t care if they slip into the country of their dreams ..
            3. The comment was deleted.
              1. -1
                18 March 2016 10: 36
                Quote: Sukhov
                . And it’s impossible, in principle, to express an attitude towards this course and the government

                The president has a rating of 83%, government - 59%, Medvedev - 60%. VTsIOM data. Do not rock the boat. Our president is the most brilliant president of the presidents. He outwitted Obama, outwitted Merkel, outwitted Erdogan, all sorts of Poroshenko and others, do not underestimate him. Putin for a new term !!!!
                1. +7
                  18 March 2016 10: 53
                  Quote: Al1977
                  Quote: Sukhov
                  . And it’s impossible, in principle, to express an attitude towards this course and the government

                  The president has a rating of 83%, government - 59%, Medvedev - 60%. VTsIOM data. Do not rock the boat. Our president is the most brilliant president of the presidents. He outwitted Obama, outwitted Merkel, outwitted Erdogan, all sorts of Poroshenko and others, do not underestimate him. Putin for a new term !!!!


                  Let's separate the flies from the cutlets. Putin deals with cutlets, he’s just super! But Medvedev got flies ... Well, he does not know how to cook them!
                  1. +11
                    18 March 2016 11: 12
                    Quote: Yuyuka
                    Let's separate the flies from the cutlets. Putin deals with cutlets, he’s just super! But Medvedev got flies ... Well, he does not know how to cook them!

                    Does Obama appoint Medvedev? Or is Putin the most mediocre employer? In general, it’s time to include the Rotenbergs in the economic bloc; people from judokas have turned into millionaires in a short period. And you can’t call them corrupt. And their ability to win all major government orders shows that they are simply the gods of the Russian economy. The Siluanovs are not suitable for soles. And also the wives of Shuvalov, Dvarkovich, the niece of Tkachev is also a young genius. It’s the sea of ​​candidates, but Putin doesn’t see it ... At least he consulted here or something.
                  2. +7
                    18 March 2016 11: 14
                    Quote: Yuyuka
                    Let's separate the flies from the cutlets. Putin deals with cutlets, he’s just super! But Medvedev got flies ... Well, he does not know how to cook them!

                    And read the constitution:
                    "The President of the Russian Federation, in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws, determines main directions of domestic and foreign policy of the state. "Domestic first is even written down.
                    1. +5
                      18 March 2016 11: 20
                      Quote: Al1977
                      Quote: Yuyuka
                      Let's separate the flies from the cutlets. Putin deals with cutlets, he’s just super! But Medvedev got flies ... Well, he does not know how to cook them!

                      And read the constitution:
                      "The President of the Russian Federation, in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws, determines the main directions of the state's domestic and foreign policy." It is even written down in the first place.


                      well, am I at least somehow trying to find excuses for our lord ... as for foreign policy and the army, no one will argue? this is the cutlets ... but with the economy of Chega, there’s no way ... that’s why such a sad irony hi

                      in addition - the president's rating is just gratitude for the "cutlets" "... if the poll was on 2 questions - we would add the economy, I don’t think there would be a high percentage of" approvals "
                      1. +2
                        18 March 2016 11: 29
                        Quote: Yuyuka
                        well, I'm at least somehow trying to find excuses for our lord ... as for foreign policy

                        "Admittedly surprised - successes in foreign policy? feel The country is under sanctions - thank God in part, they have not yet been brought to Iran, there will be a collapse ... Not one ally, apart from rogue countries, there’s nowhere to go for GDP even))) He sits exactly in the Kremlin, even stopped rolling around the country Primorye the new chicks of Siberian Cranes have grown up, where now they will fly who will show them the right path crying ??
                        1. +8
                          18 March 2016 11: 35
                          Quote: afdjhbn67
                          the new chicks of the Siberian Cranes have grown up, where will they fly now who will show them the right path ??

                          Why didn’t they please you?))
                          And as for the sanctions ... Yes, it's time for the people to dump, but pay the "partners" to impose sanctions as in Iran. Can you imagine? Just because the gold and foreign currency wrappers are not bought, you can make all medicine free)).
                        2. +1
                          18 March 2016 11: 38
                          Quote: ctepx
                          Why didn’t they please you?))

                          I'm sorry lol Well, I didn’t write about hedgehogs, if hedgehog would have run over))) I wouldn’t have fought off the fauna later drinks
                        3. +3
                          18 March 2016 11: 55
                          Yes, this is ours, the Russian fauna, she is such))drinks
                        4. The comment was deleted.
                        5. +2
                          18 March 2016 12: 52
                          Quote: afdjhbn67
                          Quote: ctepx
                          Why didn’t they please you?))

                          I'm sorry lol Well, I didn’t write about hedgehogs, if hedgehog would have run over))) I wouldn’t have fought off the fauna later drinks

                          Hedgehogs, this is pooh, if I wrote about penguins - immediately anathema laughing
                        6. 0
                          18 March 2016 12: 58
                          Quote: Normal ok
                          Hedgehog, this is pooh

                          Well fse Hedgehog it seems got laughing
                          And penguins, yes .. attempt on spiritual bonds (s)
                        7. +1
                          18 March 2016 11: 39
                          Quote: ctepx
                          Why didn’t they please you?))

                          they are under sanctions))) laughing
                          Sterkhovod in Sochi feel
                        8. +1
                          18 March 2016 11: 53
                          Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                          Sterkhovod in Sochi

                          Like already in the Crimea ..
                        9. +5
                          18 March 2016 11: 57
                          Quote: afdjhbn67
                          Like already in the Crimea ..

                          Everything is close there tongue
                          one and a half stroke on the gallery laughing
                        10. 0
                          18 March 2016 12: 00
                          Quote: PHANTOM-AS

                          such))
                        11. +1
                          18 March 2016 11: 58
                          Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                          Quote: ctepx
                          Why didn’t they please you?))
                          they are under sanctions)))

                          It means that our "partners" were baked with something))
                        12. Mobius
                          +3
                          18 March 2016 11: 58
                          Quote: afdjhbn67
                          The country is under sanctions - thank God partial, until Iran has not yet been brought, the collapse will be instant ...


                          Large-scale sanctions are a heavy burden for any state. For Russia as well.

                          But let me disagree with the likelihood of a "momentary collapse", and other "everything is gone" in relation to the Russian Federation specifically ...
                          Is Iran’s economy and finance more stable than those of the Russian Federation?

                          And Iran survived. So why do you think that Russia does not have mobilization resources and the will to survive?
                        13. 0
                          18 March 2016 12: 04
                          Quote: Möbius
                          Is Iran’s economy and finance more stable than those of the Russian Federation?

                          It is not strange yes! You can list for a long time, I just don’t like to ride long carts. (fingers knotted) lol
                        14. Mobius
                          +3
                          18 March 2016 12: 28
                          Quote: afdjhbn67
                          It is not strange yes! you can list for a long time


                          That's just about "We all will die",do not...

                          He who digs our grave will catch a cold ...ON OUR NAMES fellow tongue
                        15. 0
                          18 March 2016 12: 40
                          Quote: Möbius
                          "We all die",

                          you even in one of my comme even in the form of jokes met this phrase ??
                          And who is digging the grave for us ?? Within the meaning of the article and comments, the government and the guarantor (((
                          So shouting cheers - it's on another branch .. Glory to the caliber soldier wassat
                        16. Mobius
                          +2
                          18 March 2016 13: 46
                          Quote: afdjhbn67

                          It is not strange yes! You can list for a long time, I just don’t like to ride long carts. (fingers knotted)


                          Duc, write a lot and do not ...

                          Give a link to the data or material explaining what Iran can afford and is not able to do Russia in opposing and countering sanctions ...

                          And there, I myself, like something, something, may be clumsy ...
                        17. +1
                          18 March 2016 12: 06
                          "Frankly, surprised - success in foreign policy? Feel The country is under sanctions - thank God, partial sanctions, the Iranians have not yet been brought up, the collapse will be instantaneous ... Not a single ally, not counting rogue states, the GDP has nowhere to go to visit))) Sits exactly in the Kremlin, even stopped rolling around the country Won in Primorye new Siberian Crane chicks have grown up, where should they fly now who will show them the right way crying ??

                          Well, you can’t close your eyes so much and be naive request success in the external I don't even want to argue ... the attitude has changed dramatically on the part of the main p (artner) a. Why go to visit someone ?? There is no need here and does not go. And then ... a little digression into history. Where did Stalin go? Tokmo to Tehran, where everyone stood up when he appeared ... So they'd better come to us ... to the Kolyma. Vaughn Kerry with a suitcase goes to the "regional" power.

                          As for the sanctions ... I once offered to chip in on the Obama monument - "From the grateful Russian people for the sanctions."
                      2. +6
                        18 March 2016 11: 52
                        Quote: Yuyuka
                        in addition - the president's rating is just gratitude for the "cutlets" "... if the poll was on 2 questions - we would add the economy, I don’t think there would be a high percentage of" approvals "

                        And Soloviev in vain has a house on Lake Garda in Italy)) How does it work, with a twinkle))) Therefore, the second question, as it were, is not on the agenda))) I liked one urya-patriot on one program "You think in 1941 year did people think about the economy? No, everyone stood at the bench, they had to save their homeland. We are now also in a state of war .. "That's how it is, and you are here about the second question))) And under Putin, the war will not end, so we estimate his only on the first question))) And so I want to live with the second ..)))))
                        1. +5
                          18 March 2016 12: 01
                          Quote: Al1977
                          But Solovyov in vain does he have a house on Lake Garda in Italy)) How it works, with a twinkle)))

                          if you publish everything that guardians of Russia have abroad, people will go crazy Yes
                        2. Mobius
                          +2
                          18 March 2016 12: 22
                          Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                          if you publish everything that guardians of Russia have abroad, people will go crazy


                          WE WILL BUY EVERYTHING! There will be one big ruble.

                          But they say Rublevka, not Russia request what belay ...
                        3. +4
                          18 March 2016 12: 34
                          Quote: Möbius
                          WE WILL BUY EVERYTHING! There will be one big ruble.

                        4. +6
                          18 March 2016 12: 19
                          Therefore, the second question, as it were, is not on the agenda))) I liked one urya-patriot in one program "Do you think people thought about economics in 1941? No, everyone stood at the bench, we had to save our homeland. We are now also war .. "That's how it is, and you are here about the second question))) And under Putin, the war will not end, so we evaluate it only on the first question))) And so I want to live with the second ..)))))

                          Well, I would put two pluses, but the rules do not allow laughing rating is a tricky thing - does not go down to details! as the first-last president of the USSR said - "in general" is understandable, but I would like to deepen ... wide wassat sad, but the belt in difficult times for some reason tighten on ordinary people, affectionately correcting it on the neck hi
                  3. The comment was deleted.
                  4. Mobius
                    +2
                    18 March 2016 21: 19
                    Quote: Yuyuka
                    Let's separate the flies from the cutlets. Putin deals with cutlets, he’s just super! But Medvedev got flies ... Well, he does not know how to cook them!


                    Half the trouble is that he does not know how to cook them ... Well, it’s not given, well, that’s all.

                    Only here flies climb on cutlets. And Putin, to his careless apprentice apprentice, does not give a brow on the forehead ... And he does not drive from the kitchen.
                2. The comment was deleted.
              2. +12
                18 March 2016 10: 48
                It is impossible to discuss the economic course of our government without using the so-called profanity. But to express an attitude towards this course and the government is impossible in principle.
                So the site administration. You either make a leniency in terms of vocabulary when discussing economic issues or enter a taboo on this topic.


                come on! all normal people know how to read ambiguity, and with some preparation and triple sense! well, for example, today this (masculine adjective from "rowing") p (artne) p
                Obama again accused Russia!

                and another article

                Buying American bonds, Russia lends America and “holds on a hook” the strongest economy in the world. In addition, Russia receives a fixed income in foreign currency. “Thus, Russia not only maintains its own foreign exchange reserves, but also increases them,” Kochetkov summarizes.

                Ento how, your mother, I’m sorry, understand? (C)
                Who hooked anyone?
                there is folk wisdom on this subject

                - Robots, I caught a bear!
                - Drag here!
                - Yes, he does not let!
            4. +4
              18 March 2016 10: 58
              And in medicine, in schools, education, science, in the same kapitalku take part poorly !!!
            5. +1
              19 March 2016 17: 28
              .... I think that it is necessary to store something that is not involved in the economy or (it cannot at the moment), but there are a lot of cases and unsolved problems in the Russian Federation (+ a small cart), investments are always required, so this means a place in Russia ... money is the blood of the economy!
            6. 0
              19 March 2016 20: 16
              Quote: smel
              And the deputies would have to think about whether our industry (health care, education, science, production, etc.) can digest such money?

              Yes, you would have to work with such issues in the government! Well, you have to write this ?!
          4. +22
            18 March 2016 08: 17
            Quote: Aleksander
            And the main question is WHAT NEXT? Waitwhen will stop stealing?

            In my opinion, world communism will wait for more chances .... laughing
            1. +7
              18 March 2016 11: 03
              Not true! The world will save love, faith and mass executions .... laughing
          5. +26
            18 March 2016 09: 14
            Paradox! Since the beginning of 2016 Moscow invested about 5mln. dale to America, and immediately seeks external borrowings of 3 mln. Golden Saxons and others prohibit Western banks from lending to Russia ... Where is the logic? or is it this kind of rent now?
            1. +3
              18 March 2016 09: 41
              Here's another info:
              U.S. Treasury securities have been selling at a record pace since 1978. The Central Banks of the world sold US government bonds totaling $ 57,2 billion in January — $ 9,2 billion more than a month earlier, Westfinance reports.

              Over the past year, global regulators dropped US government debt securities in the amount of $ 225 billion - this is an absolute record for the entire history of the existence of Kazan papers.

              However, many Central Banks do not sell paper from a good life - they have to patch up their own budgets and stimulate national economies. According to the US Treasury, in January, the Celestial Empire became the largest seller of American debt, dropping securities in the amount of $ 8,2 billion. Raw materials are actively selling government bonds - Norway, Mexico, Canada and Colombia.

              But there is also an opposite trend. For example, Japan and Belgium have increased their positions. Brazil is also increasing the volume of government securities, despite the oil crisis. True, there is a rumor in the market that "Belgium" is the US government, which operates in Brussels through dummies and buys its own national debt in order to maintain high demand, but there is no documentary confirmation of this hypothesis.

              But, in any case, a yield of about 2% at present is very attractive amid the fact that the Central Bank of Europe, Japan and a number of countries have already brought their own government bonds to the negative zone.

              But the US authorities have their own legal instrument for buying treasury bonds. In accordance with the rules, the Fed sends interest income from its portfolio of assets to purchase a US government debt, and the Federal Reserve's portfolio is estimated at $ 4,2 trillion.

              http://expert.ru/2016/03/17/trezheris/?ny
          6. +1
            18 March 2016 10: 09
            Quote: Aleksander
            What is the state that is afraid to invest in its development because of the fear of theft?

            - in fact, there are reasons to be afraid. How many cases can you remember when our swindlers, who "suddenly" became political emigrants and fled to London, were returned to us, having sent their capital there on fictitious deals in advance? Can you recall the cases of opposite emigration of businessmen from the West?
            If everything is invested in enterprises that fulfill state orders and defense orders, then there is a high probability of ruining the self-development of everything else, because all resources and human aspirations will be in one special area.
            Is a loan in the west cheaper? If you can’t return it, then maybe the state will insure if you carry out its orders. If they closed it, then there is no place to hide the little egg in the west.
          7. +4
            18 March 2016 10: 51
            And then it’s simple, it’s time for a long time to change such figures as Medvedev and his sabotage government, up to the local regional tsars who finance the Moscow masters with the withdrawal of capital abroad, so much for the depreciation of the nat. under this government, the country is doomed to a feverish economy dependent on energy resources, production will simply suffocate, and add the sale of state property, without strict control of the state itself on the sold and already sold property and factories, most are ruined - a lesson did not go to proc, the same rake. But the government is rocking the boat, titanic efforts are being made to create dissatisfaction with the president in the country, and this is done locally.
          8. +2
            18 March 2016 23: 00
            Guys, this is not a state, but a Duma! It is necessary to create laws against corruption and theft, they themselves OBEY these laws, and for this at least occasionally go to work. am
          9. 0
            24 March 2016 23: 22
            Damn, colleagues, we have almost the entire government - agents of Western influence. What are you surprised at?
        2. +25
          18 March 2016 07: 41
          Yeah, here's another good argument:
          "The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money."
          1. +8
            18 March 2016 08: 14
            Quote: yegor_k
            Yeah, here's another good argument:
            "The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money."

            I’m adding ... because they have real estate abroad, children study, money is stored (it is not necessary to open an account for yourself).
        3. +20
          18 March 2016 07: 58
          Quote: sa-zz
          Nabiulina did not come to explain?

          So in Russia the national bank is not Russian but American, investing in the American dollar, this national bank supports it and accordingly supports its high rate in the Russian market. Prices are rising in Russia, since the import component is large (which will not decrease because they do not invest in their industry and education) and the last hard earned money is pulled from the Russian people, and someone else has the conscience to talk about the reliability and profitability of investments in the American economy .
          Some kind of hyper-perverted form of governance of the Russian economy. Raise the refinancing interest rate and invest in US bonds? If the Russian economy was full of leaps and bounds, there would be nowhere to understand. With the impoverishment of their people to invest in the American economy? It turns out that the entire Russian state exists only in order for the gold and foreign exchange reserves to grow in the national bank. Excuse me, they are stealing corruption in the camp, they are not stealing in America, they are lobbying there, maybe in Russia they can replace the word corruption with the word lobbying, glory to the government, corruption was defeated.
          1. +18
            18 March 2016 08: 30
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            So in Russia the national bank is not Russian but American, investing in the American dollar, this national bank supports it and accordingly supports its high rate in the Russian market.

            The chain is very simple -

            1. US issued dollars
            2. Funded their own economy (social sphere, army, alien orange revolution - underline what is necessary)
            3. Immediately these dollars were thrown into the world in one way or another

            Сonclusion
            1. Their financial system is stable, since the number of dollars within the country has not increased.
            2. THEIR people (army, economy, government) are satisfied.
            3. Looking at how INSIDE IN America, the whole world is grabbing paper, thinking that with THIS paper they will have the same thing (but something in any way ... It's like in a casino - it’s only casino that benefits - pure mathematics ...) ..
            4. Prior to the constellation of Alpha Centauri, American debt is growing - and even pill. Nobody will force you to return ...

            Question “Why do we need to take part in this scam?”
        4. +21
          18 March 2016 08: 21
          "Moscow's investment of foreign currency in its native economy will rather lead to a new round of corruption than to the development of the domestic economy and industry. At least, this is what some experts think."
          Pinch me! What is this anyway? What the f ... ism? Or are they all being held for idiots !? What kind of "experts" are they?
          1. +5
            18 March 2016 10: 58
            Pinch me! What is this anyway? What the f ... ism? Or are they all being held for idiots !? What kind of "experts" are they?

            the more monstrous a lie, the faster they will believe in it ... (c)
            still a talented bastard was in the field of the human psyche ...
          2. +7
            18 March 2016 12: 06
            will lead to a new round of corruption
            The government (GOVERNMENT, CARL) says that the level of corruption will rise. It turns out like this - you know, here we have a little money, we have calculated for ourselves how much we need. Groaning, a little allocated to the people, so as not to be indignant (we give him a lot of something, somewhere else we need to pinch off, where they will not do anything to us). And a little more left. You know, let's hide. Suddenly we will come in handy later. And we will not give it to anyone. They will steal, we know them. Yes, and why should they. They themselves will get out.
            You see, the government actually steals this money from medicine and education, while setting various preferences for itself and complains that there are thieves around the country. If they have the mentality of thieves, then they only see thieves (but do not touch them - their all the same) and suckers.
            Where to invest money? If you give thieves, they will steal it. Give the fuckers - thieves will take it away. Therefore, it seems to them that they act perfectly rationally. And to convince them is impossible. They have such a reality. It just doesn't occur to them that a thief should be in prison.
            The one who didn’t want to share gets into prison (Hodor, for example, but not Potanin! Although there is no difference between them), or a trifle that is not a pity (and good for prevention - don’t climb into our territory, everything is already taken) .
          3. +4
            18 March 2016 14: 55
            Quote: Observer2014
            "Moscow's investment of foreign currency in its native economy will rather lead to a new round of corruption than to the development of the domestic economy and industry. At least, this is what some experts think."
            Pinch me! Is that what?What is this f ... ism? Or are they all being held for idiots !? What kind of "experts" are they?

            By the way, these words are not original. The primary source of this "masterpiece" is that it is better to give money to America so as not to plunder here - Kudrin. I heard how he said this even when he was kicked off by the ministers for his tongue and tongue.

            I didn’t understand something - did we have Chubais-2 show up? Another unsinkable?
        5. +9
          18 March 2016 08: 40
          Without the 37th, bureaucrats can’t moderate their appetites!
          To shoot a couple of thousand, it’s indicative, that’s all the treatment !!!
          1. -1
            18 March 2016 10: 28
            Something such executions do not particularly help China, as corruption and bribery have remained so, according to the latest research by China itself.
        6. +9
          18 March 2016 09: 02
          Finally, a new national idea was voiced:
          -------------------------------------------------- -
          Moscow’s investment of currency in its native economy will likely lead to a new round of corruption, rather than to the development of the domestic economy and industry
          -------------------------------------------------- ----------------
          And then here recently the astronaut Lazutkin, naively crucified like: flying to Mars should become a national idea. What a fly! To pry before the start: =)
          1. +2
            18 March 2016 09: 22
            You just need to explain to people: what exactly can be stolen on Mars, and then the flight will definitely take place in the coming years.
        7. Old
          +9
          18 March 2016 09: 26
          I can imagine how Joseph Vissarionitch would smile at such an excuse.)
        8. +2
          18 March 2016 09: 51
          Although I’ll explain it at least, but it doesn’t look right, America doesn’t buy other people's bonds, and in Russia it’s not necessary to raise a business. . . Corruption - afraid of the Wolf in the Forest not to GO. . .
        9. 0
          18 March 2016 10: 32
          Quote: sa-zz

          Nabiulina did not come to explain?

          And what is there to explain? If we continue to invest, then Russia is not yet ready to withstand the collapse of the dollar.
        10. +3
          18 March 2016 12: 04
          Buying up American bonds, Russia lends to America and “holds on to the hook” the strongest economy in the world.

          yeah, it's like catching a shark on a spinning !!!!
          Moscow’s investment of currency in the home economy will most likely lead to a new round of corruption, rather than to the development of domestic economy and industry. At least some experts think so.

          I would put such experts under execution.
          We will give the money to the enemies under the guise of "profitable" investments at interest less than 1, while investing in our country is impossible because corruption, and we cannot / cannot fight corruption, because hitting yourself in the head isn't cool.

          This reminds me of the otmaz about our interest rate: such as interest more than 20, but in reality as a result of more than 30 we get such high, because if we lower it, inflation will rise. RAVE!!!!!!!
          In short, an article in the style of "justifying stupidity and helplessness in the face of the current hopelessness" !!!
        11. +4
          18 March 2016 12: 55
          O. Kh. To have an argument.
          Nabiulina did not come to explain?
          Especially after having invested 14.7 billion in US bonds for the year, immediately declare the issue of own bonds on which you will have to pay interest 2-3 times more than the yield of Amer
        12. +2
          18 March 2016 13: 19
          Quote: sa-zz
          O. Kh. To have an argument.
          Nabiulina did not come to explain?

          And even if they come, they will explain the type of risks, it is more reliable here, etc. And to build BAM-2, for example, or powerful industrial facilities for the production of high-tech products - what for, it’s necessary, in 10-15 years it will only begin to shoot. As well as investments in educational systems - some marketers and economists are surrounded by lawyers. sad
          1. +1
            18 March 2016 14: 41
            Quote: Corsair
            Quote: sa-zz
            O. Kh. To have an argument.
            Nabiulina did not come to explain?

            And even if they come, they will explain the type of risks, it is more reliable here, etc. And to build BAM-2, for example, or powerful industrial facilities for the production of high-tech products - what for, it’s necessary, in 10-15 years it will only begin to shoot. As well as investments in educational systems - some marketers and economists are surrounded by lawyers. sad

            ******
            I agree! Spawned "economists" all the skill of which to invest someone else's (people's) money in foreign banks and cut interest in their pockets. And then cry what a bad paper dollar, how could it grow so unsupported by anything ?! Now oil does not give us any profit, we need to raise prices on the domestic market as soon as possible. And so in a circle! But there is no brain to bring out these 90 lars and build factories, factories, institutes on them and receive and multiply living profits for many years without the risk that someone will freeze something. But no, this is bad! It is difficult to steal such a profit, it is not from account to account to transfer! There should only be a pipe in the country.
        13. 0
          19 March 2016 17: 19
          .... She can come and explain, but alas, not for you, not for us, but for them!
      2. +15
        18 March 2016 07: 01
        The route to the next world?
        “There is no more medicine in Lysva!” - This phrase has recently been increasingly heard from dissatisfied patients. They say this - no, they are already shouting loudly - both young and senior citizens. They are judged by the fact that cores and hypertensive patients are being taken to Chusovaya, by how rapidly the number of beds in our city hospital is rapidly decreasing. “Though they leave us a morgue?” - the reader who called the editor asks sarcastically. And he can be understood - pent!
        No comment.
        1. +6
          18 March 2016 08: 10
          Yes, this is all over the Perm Territory. It’s practically impossible to get to a hospital in such departments as neurology, cardiology. I myself was registered with a neuropathologist, the consequences of a concussion and my spine was damaged, I scored for our free medicine. I travel for my penny to Izhevsk. and I don’t stand in lines, and I began to turn very rarely (I used to be bent four times a year on the sick-list, now once for a week’s prophylaxis)
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +17
        18 March 2016 07: 26
        It reminds of an old Soviet anecdote, when a patient demanded an "ear-eye" doctor, because he heard one thing and saw another. Was this why the US invested in the Chinese economy in order to shave off its debts? Or will someone give an example of when the US paid off its debt bonds? laughing
        Moreover, the USA itself has banned many foreign banks from accepting their own bonds from Russia as guarantees for loans.
        1. +5
          18 March 2016 07: 46
          Quote: siberalt

          Moreover, the very USA forbade many foreign banks to accept their own bonds from Russia as guarantees for a loan.


          Can I talk about this in more detail?

          If so, then this is equivalent to at least partially blocking these investments. In other words, these are concrete steps by the US financial authorities, which already significantly increase the risk of non-return with all the ensuing risk assessments of these investments.
          1. +5
            18 March 2016 09: 35
            Details in US sanctions. Here another is more interesting. To whom can the Chinese present the return of American debt in more than a trillion bucks? Really to the Americans themselves? laughing For some reason, their grandmothers declined for some reason. I recalled another joke when the debtor answered the obsessive creditor - if you continue to harass the repayment of the debt, I’ll generally delete you from my list laughing
            1. +5
              18 March 2016 11: 29
              Like, due to lack of money in the budget this year, state assets will be privatized, and the most liquid ones.
              The president and the government are constantly looking for Western investors in the economy.
              For the second year now, the President and the government have been teaching the people how to tighten their belts more firmly and properly. The media is teaching us how to save in difficult times.
              Jobs are being reduced, vital sectors for the country are underfunded.
              Pensions are not indexed.
              The ruble collapsed three times and was told that it’s good for the people, they raise gas prices, increase the tax burden, etc.
              At the same time, they invest in the economies of hostile states !!!, both directly, by the state, and as an outflow of capital !!!
              This is the state in the Looking Glass, with the looking glass HPP.
              Well, while the people are waving, this will continue ...
              1. +1
                18 March 2016 11: 40
                Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                The president and the government are constantly looking for Western investors in the economy.

                Your untruth. The President requires that only Russian legal entities participate in privatization)).
                1. +4
                  18 March 2016 12: 06
                  Quote: ctepx
                  Your untruth. The President requires that only Russian legal entities participate in privatization)).

                  yeah, he has been winning corruption for 16 years already wink
                  But seriously, on some currency speculations for a year and a half, tovarischchi the drain of the green dough was "raised", which, with the current exchange rate, can buy up the whole country with fields and meadows am
                2. +3
                  18 March 2016 12: 06
                  Quote: ctepx
                  Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                  The president and the government are constantly looking for Western investors in the economy.

                  Your untruth. The President requires that only Russian legal entities participate in privatization)).

                  Why are there legal entities, these "persons" are all known and they are quite "physical". Geniuses of judo and business at the same time)))
                3. +1
                  18 March 2016 12: 06
                  Quote: ctepx
                  Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                  The president and the government are constantly looking for Western investors in the economy.

                  Your untruth. The President requires that only Russian legal entities participate in privatization)).

                  Why are there legal entities, these "persons" are all known and they are quite "physical". Geniuses of judo and business at the same time)))
            2. 0
              19 March 2016 07: 02
              Quote: siberalt
              Details in US sanctions. laughing


              What sanctions imposed restrictions on foreign banks "to accept their own bonds from Russia as guarantees against a loan"?

              Or again blah blah: "Everyone knows very well ..."
        2. +1
          18 March 2016 07: 49
          Quote: siberalt
          when the patient demanded an "ear-eye" doctor because he heard one thing and saw another.

          good Doctor to me .. Doctor laughing
          1. +3
            18 March 2016 11: 02
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            Quote: siberalt
            when the patient demanded an "ear-eye" doctor because he heard one thing and saw another.

            good Doctor to me .. Doctor laughing


            in turn, you sons of bitches! wassat half the country already wrote the numbers on the palms! .............
      5. +16
        18 March 2016 08: 01
        God help you, Mr. Obama!
      6. +2
        18 March 2016 22: 19
        Quote: iza top
        chef! u have gone, the cast is removed, the client is leaving! (c)

        Laughter, laughter, but the GDP is worth considering a change in financial policy, I’m sure we Russian citizens are starting to understand poorly who is driving us so finely, that as they show to us in this caricature, we are looting them, you won’t get a hell out of it, the question is who sees an idiot in someone!
      7. +1
        19 March 2016 20: 10
        I would pay attention to those who advocate investing money in American papers .. Namely, all sorts of advisers, experts from various funds, advice and other scum that does nothing .. They foaming at their mouths stand up for mythical profits from this waste paper and other fabulous fables about the control of the American economy and other nonsense, the conclusion suggests itself that all these comrades live precisely at the expense of these injections .. How can it be that sponsoring your enemy to broadcast that this is for the good of the homeland .. In the transmission of one, the same expert squealed that we have darkness of imports and US securities guarantee our solvency .. Or maybe we can invest tens of billions in our country, buy technologies, the necessary equipment, invest them in institutes and vocational schools that will allow us to master these technologies and equipment, and teachers who will teach these things .. maybe in a few years and will not need such a number of imports and will do a lot ourselves? But in this case, these "comrades" will have to go to work, and not broadcast their "expert" opinion while doing nothing useful ... Alas, it looks like the powers that be from our bureaucracy really do not want it .. And if this problem is not solved our country is doomed .. everything else does not matter, no matter how hard the people are, no matter how heroically people behave, all this is useless! It's time to put things in order in the country! There should be enough pillars on the Moscow Ring Road for these figures, but there will not be enough for the third transport and other highways ..
    2. +14
      18 March 2016 06: 27
      Clearly, in short, you invest in America, get interest, invest with us, no money, no interest ....
      1. +12
        18 March 2016 06: 41
        Quote: Igor39
        Clearly, in short, you invest in America, get interest, invest with us, no money, no interest ....

        We can also emphasize that corruption and the system of distribution of state finances are so miserable that it is easier to invest money in another economy.
        1. +18
          18 March 2016 06: 56
          Quote: Nsk 54
          corruption and the system of distribution of state finances is so miserable

          Corruption is just not wretched - it blooms luxuriantly, if only the state recognizes its inability to combat this phenomenon. One way out: to declare at the highest level that stealing is a sin and a shame! Probably, corrupt officials and embezzlers are not aware of this. I don’t see a more real way laughing
          Although there is another (fantastic) way - to change the socio-economic formation. I remember that under the Soviet system, theft was not elevated to the meaning of life and did not take on such cosmic proportions that threatened the country's security.
          1. +10
            18 March 2016 08: 10
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            One way out: to declare at the highest level that stealing is a sin and a shame!

            so Putin already said ... and even threatened with a finger ...- are not afraid!
          2. +2
            18 March 2016 09: 46
            One way out: to declare at the highest level that stealing is a sin and a shame!


            at the highest it has already been said, "do not kill, do not steal ..." smile Well, and in the second coming, nobody will need money laughing
          3. +5
            18 March 2016 13: 29
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Corruption is just not wretched - it blooms luxuriantly, if only the state recognizes its inability to combat this phenomenon. One way out: to declare at the highest level that stealing is a sin and a shame! Probably, corrupt officials and embezzlers are not aware of this. I don’t see a more real way

            laughing executions, only executions, with complete confiscation of property.
            You do not live by income - a month to repent and explain where such luxury comes from, without the possibility of the whole family leaving the country.
            Plus storytellers, whose wife’s children and other relatives suddenly became super-successful businessmen in Siberia to develop territories all together. request
            It seems that very quickly those who want to get into the state pocket will decrease.
        2. +22
          18 March 2016 06: 56
          So nepotism everywhere and everywhere, Vasilyeva and Serdyukov escaped punishment for a reason, Seryukov appointed Putin well, we don’t give up, and Vasiliev’s sister is Medvedev’s wife, everything is shorter. Yesterday I read that Rogozin’s son was appointed deputy director of the property department of the Russian Ministry of Defense . To see a specialist is good. Everyone will inherit posts soon, I have never heard of grandchildren.
        3. +9
          18 March 2016 07: 00
          Not exactly, dear Alex, Nsk 54, hi .

          I asked a question to the government on this topic. That is, why give your wife to your uncle, and go yourself ..., let's say, on swans. And he received an answer, the meaning of which is an elder in the garden, and an uncle in Kiev. request Look at my note / publication in VO "My dear capital".
          1. +12
            18 March 2016 07: 20
            Quote: My address
            "My dear capital".

            Buying up American bonds, Russia lends to America and “holds on to the hook” the strongest economy in the world.

            From this phrase I "pad became" .... minus the unambiguous article.
            1. +3
              18 March 2016 08: 17
              Quote: afdjhbn67
              Quote: My address
              "My dear capital".

              Buying up American bonds, Russia lends to America and “holds on to the hook” the strongest economy in the world.

              From this phrase I "pad became" .... minus the unambiguous article.

              So that's what America is not collapsing ... what
              1. +3
                18 March 2016 09: 12
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                So that's what America is not collapsing ..

                Situevina Yurich, as in a joke - Girl Robin Hood - took from the poor, gave the rich lol
        4. +5
          18 March 2016 08: 20
          Quote: Igor39
          Clearly, in short, you invest in America, get interest, invest with us, no money, no interest ....

          You invest in America, money in America, you invest money with us ... in America, we have neither money nor interest.
          1. 0
            18 March 2016 08: 41
            Quote: olimpiada15
            we have no money, no interest.

            Eugene, I apologize for yesterday's comment hi
            It was not right - got excited)))
      2. +11
        18 March 2016 07: 08
        Quote: Igor39
        Clearly, in short, you invest in America, get interest, invest with us, no money, no interest ....

        There were reports that the percentages are scanty, consider that there are almost none ... They just allegedly save money. What for??? And if they are afraid of corruption, then it is necessary to resolutely fight against corrupt officials, and so already "planting material" you will get to wherever you look. Conclusions that no one will dispute: 1. There is nothing to feed the hostile United States. 2. It is necessary to plant or eliminate corrupt officials. 3. Invest these funds in the development of industry, infrastructure, housing construction, development of health care and education within the country.
    3. +23
      18 March 2016 06: 27
      ,, "Couldn't think of anything better" -that's the key phrase, can you look for those who can think of better?
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 09: 39
        Quote: Good cat
        ,, "Couldn't think of anything better" -that's the key phrase, can you look for those who can think of better?

        It's just that we, thanks to a number of laws associated with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, are sitting on such a strong hook that the Anglo-Saxons easily broadcast information about this to feed the "opposition". Basically, this means that the line on which the hook is attached is about to break.
    4. +7
      18 March 2016 06: 31
      Moscow’s investment of currency in its native economy will lead to a new round of corruption rather than to the development of the domestic economy and industry.... Partly yes ... I will say about my management .. There were several projects .. for the development of ports on the Taman Peninsula .. they allocated money .. the money went to the designers .. the design offices of our daughter .. our enterprise .. The projects were canceled. I've been working for a long time ... there are a lot of ways of "honest" taking money from the state.
      1. +2
        18 March 2016 13: 35
        Quote: parusnik
        . There were several projects ... on the development of ports in our Taman Peninsula ... they allocated money .. money went to the designers ... the design offices of our daughter ... our enterprise ... The projects were turned down ... I've been working for a long time ... a lot of ways of "honest "taking money away from the state ..

        what And they would have left if, for example, every month suddenly people "in black" (FSB, OBKHSS) came and asked how are you, where is the project at what stage, why we are late, and the leaders had personal responsibility right up to real landings or even worse ?
    5. +16
      18 March 2016 06: 34
      So can we write out the government from America, so that they start to think and work sometimes?
      1. +9
        18 March 2016 07: 46
        Quote: VNP1958PVN
        So maybe we and the government to write out from America

        What for?? They have been dear here since 1991 ....
    6. +16
      18 March 2016 06: 36
      On the one hand, the government says that America is our enemy, on the other hand, it is invested in the American economy, and not in the domestic one. Question WHERE LOGIC?
      1. +9
        18 March 2016 07: 16
        Question WHERE LOGIC?

        U, she, the logic is such a logical logic, of our logical government (pah, I didn’t even understand what I wrote, but in principle I didn’t get far from the government, because they also sometimes don’t understand what they’re doing), which doesn’t lend itself to any logic.
      2. 0
        18 March 2016 07: 37
        Quote: dark_flame
        On the one hand, the government says that America is our enemy, on the other hand, it is invested in the American economy, and not in the domestic one. Question WHERE LOGIC?

        Americans invest their money in ANY securities that make a profit, including in Russian - what is strange about that?
      3. +3
        18 March 2016 07: 45
        Quote: dark_flame
        On the one hand, the government says that America is our enemy,

        This is a slogan for purely internal use, so that one would not look so carefully into losing wallets ... Karoche - Obama is to blame for everything ...
        1. +4
          18 March 2016 10: 45
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          Quote: dark_flame
          On the one hand, the government says that America is our enemy,

          This is a slogan for purely internal use, so that one would not look so carefully into losing wallets ... Karoche - Obama is to blame for everything ...

          It would be funny if it were not so sad. A year ago, my parents said that they really believe in the imminent start of World War III, and that Obama is about to start bombing us with nuclear weapons ... I can’t forbid them to watch TV .. And we have more than half of such a population ... And at the same time this population rushes off in exchange to buy bucks, as soon as another collapse of the ruble ... And with whom else to fight the people, en with Putin, he is simply God, a genius whom has not been in the history of Russia since the time of Stalin))))
          1. +1
            18 March 2016 11: 50
            Quote: Al1977
            he is simply God, whose genius was not in the history of Russia since the time of Stalin))))

            And they say - his tears cure cancer))))
    7. +20
      18 March 2016 06: 38
      Buying up American bonds, Russia lends to America and “holds on to the hook” the strongest economy in the world. In addition, Russia receives a fixed income in foreign currency. “Thus, Russia not only maintains its own foreign exchange reserves, but also increases them,” Kochetkov summarizes. .. Delirium of a madman, especially about a hook. “The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money. For example, of the 90 billion dollars invested in the US public debt, a third is withdrawn and invested in the purchase of gold. This will immediately cause a serious increase in gold prices .... Well, for hell is such a government, led by a bear?
      1. +1
        18 March 2016 07: 43
        Quote: asiat_61
        . This will immediately cause a serious increase in gold prices.

        Which, in turn, cause the growth of Russian government bonds (yes, Russia also has its own securities) which are provided with this gold.
      2. +8
        18 March 2016 07: 49
        Quote: asiat_61
        Buying American bonds, Russia lends America and “holds on a hook” the strongest economy in the world. In addition, Russia receives a fixed income in foreign currency. “Thus, Russia not only maintains its own foreign exchange reserves, but also increases them,” Kochetkov summarizes.
        “The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money.
        Well, to hell with such a government, led by a bear?

        There is "cognitive dissonance"!
        The same Nabiullina with a team - taught one, at the Higher School of Economics; and do everything as taught! As a result, the Central Bank becomes the destroyer of the Russian economy! And it cannot be said that they do not see this - the head of the Central Bank resists the frank promises of the same Ulyukaev "to invest money there" with a barely veiled prospect of their subsequent "drinking" and simply stealing! remnants of conscience and common sense? ...
        __________
        And what about profits, percent of investments in America - yeah, they have them; and there is a "hook" in stock - such a lazy hook ... But on it - a huge shark! who pretends to chew the bait ...
        They can do what they have repeatedly done with "undemocrats and terrorists" - seize assets, freeze accounts ... what else to invent! ...
        America fanatically guards and defends its sovereignty, and has NEVER tolerated, and, I think, will not tolerate the dictates of ANY international legislation, obligations, treaties, and so on over its legislation and its "democracy"! They ALWAYS spat on agreements and international treaties, trampled on the legislation of other countries with an American military boot ...
        ... Dangerous "partner"!
    8. +13
      18 March 2016 06: 40
      I’m also saying that enough to feed Kansas, let’s better build a dozen other modern plants for these 6 billion dollars, and for sure there will be money left for a hundred other kindergartens and schools.
      1. +1
        18 March 2016 10: 19
        let's build a dozen other modern plants on these 6 billion dollars,


        I'm afraid it will be a little different. 5,9 billion rubles will go to design and "consulting". And for the remaining 0,1 billion, they will paint the fence around the kindergarten. We had a case in Nizhny about "Navashinsky millions" - a classic. Yes, in fact, there would have been no "business" if Klimentyev had shared and had not climbed into power.

        "Sin to sin - strife. I tell everyone openly that I take bribes, but what bribes? Borzoi puppies. This is a completely different matter." laughing This is Russia
    9. +9
      18 March 2016 06: 44
      Russia needs to create financial instruments and invest normally in its economy, in infrastructure projects. If you finance them directly, “there may be big costs”, namely the “corruption component”. “If the funds are allocated simply for the state-owned company, then it is likely that the money, let’s say, will be spent inefficiently.
      The Central Bank of the Russian Federation seems to be betting on the development of the corporate bond market. Financing the economy through bonded loans is the Anglo-Saxon system as opposed to banking (German-Roman) credit. The banking system of financing on a global scale has long been failing (money goes to soap bubbles (real estate, stocks, etc.), currency speculation). Project financing requires highly qualified personnel (for Russia there is little problem of speculators of dohren, creators) and tight and transparent control over financing, who should be financed and under what conditions (nobody canceled the lobbying factor). I think the Ministry of Finance will lay its bones against (flows past him, but they will ask him for financial stability). This solution can only be promoted by the Guarantor.
      1. +1
        18 March 2016 07: 20
        Quote: Ramzes33

        Good professional commentary. To the author "+".
      2. +3
        18 March 2016 08: 32
        "... this decision can only be promoted by the Guarantor ...."
        Apparently, the Guarantor either does not want to, or can no longer - the "vertical of power", which he also created, simply will not give him this opportunity! They will eat their own "with giblets"!
        Putin says and promises a lot of good and correct things, but the result is often "zero", his decisions are simply "sucked" in the ministries, in the regions - a good example is the construction of the Vostochny cosmodrome! He personally came and arranged the "debriefing", the Investigative Committee and the Prosecutor's Office are already living at the cosmodrome, and the result is the same - the deadlines are missed, the money is stolen ... the process went on and on as usual - no one cares about anything! He simply became a hostage of that criminally idiotic system of public administration, which he got after the "fight-drunkard"! And he did not destroy it, but only corrected it for himself, his beloved!
        And now he doesn’t trust anyone, and he’s even afraid to keep money in his country!
        My first commander said correctly: "It is better to have a" hard chancre "than a soft character" !!!!
        1. +4
          18 March 2016 09: 55
          Quote: kepmor
          My first commander said correctly: "It is better to have a" hard chancre "than a soft character" !!!!

          I was interested in the end of your comment, - I would paraphrase it a little: "You will have a soft character, you will have a hard chancre". This is how our government was determined as nothing, and in return we get "thick" circumstances, and there is no way out, and it will only get worse if ... The eternal question is "What to do?"
        2. +1
          18 March 2016 12: 31
          Quote: kepmor
          He simply became a hostage of the criminal-idiotic system of government that he got after the "fight-drunkard

          I don’t have to say too much to the deceased, he’s in hell and I hope so hard ..
          So, I’ll continue - this system, the notorious vertical of power and manual control, for a long time and carefully was built by the guarantor himself - the greatest living under the sun (train, soon we will write and speak in public about Una)
    10. +19
      18 March 2016 06: 53
      According to TASS, for the period from January 2015 to January 2016. The Russian Federation increased its investment in US government securities by $ 14,7 billion (from $ 82,2 billion to $ 96,9 billion)


      On January 25, Deputy Finance Minister Sergei Storchak announced that Russia in 2016 plans to enter the foreign borrowing market for the first time in three years. The Ministry of Finance intends to place bonds in the amount of up to three billion dollars. The money will go to cover the budget deficit (2,36 trillion rubles).

      And to borrow from what is invested in US papers does not occur to you? Payment of interest on the loan and income from US securities vary significantly. If this elementary arithmetic is not available to the government, why do we need such a government?
      All over the world they are looking for foreign investors, and their money is gathering dust on shelves.
      1. +4
        18 March 2016 07: 56
        Quote: Michael m
        According to TASS, for the period from January 2015 to January 2016. The Russian Federation increased its investment in US government securities by $ 14,7 billion (from $ 82,2 billion to $ 96,9 billion)

        All over the world they are looking for foreign investors, and their money is gathering dust on shelves.

        Largely "thanks" to the credit and investment policy of the Central Bank of Russia - Russia is in fact the most disadvantageous country for foreign investment! The very, very ... The outcast country! and the sanctions have nothing to do with it!
        ... What Sulakshin recently "reported" about, for example ... many times! thirsty - yes google! ...
        1. +3
          18 March 2016 10: 59
          Quote: CONTROL
          Largely "thanks" to the credit and investment policy of the Central Bank of Russia - Russia is in fact the most disadvantageous country for foreign investment

          And what is the policy of the Central Bank? Unprofitable because of the political system, when any business can be taken from you by the decision of the Basmanny court, and because of sanctions as well. If a foreign company, in spite of sanctions, begins to supply equipment or investments, it will face heavy fines. Himself faced this on working with partners from Germany.
    11. +4
      18 March 2016 06: 55
      Nothing changes!!!
    12. tux
      +7
      18 March 2016 07: 01
      Therefore, the American economy was chosen - the most transparent.

      If my memory serves me, then the Pentagon still can not report from 8 trillion. dollars. They were but disappeared somewhere and no one knows where. Also, the Fed could not explain where another 1,5 trillion went. And is this a transparent economy?

      So, we note in conclusion that the basis for the relevant decisions of the Central Bank is the reliability and liquidity of American securities. Apparently, this is well understood, not only in Russia, but also in China, and in Japan, whose investments in US government bonds exceed a trillion.

      Japan is a country occupied by the Americans that cannot lift a finger without the knowledge of the owners. I hope everyone remembers how they collapsed their economy in the early 90s on the orders of the Americans, when the situation arose that the Japanese economy would surpass the American one. China is certainly not an occupied country, but what will happen to its economy if the Americans withdraw their production from it to other countries, and at the same time stop ordering Chinese companies to produce products?
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 08: 01
        Quote: tux.topwar
        Therefore, the American economy was chosen - the most transparent.

        If my memory serves me, then the Pentagon still can not report from 8 trillion. dollars. They were but disappeared somewhere and no one knows where. Also, the Fed could not explain where another 1,5 trillion went. And is this a transparent economy?

        ... Any "transparent economy" will find its own Hakobyans and Copperfields!
    13. +7
      18 March 2016 07: 01
      This very corruption depends on the leadership of the country, and it does not plant large corrupt officials, only small ones.
      1. +3
        18 March 2016 12: 00
        Quote: Viktor fm
        This very corruption depends on the leadership of the country, and it does not plant large corrupt officials, only small ones.

        Is the purchase of all pipes for Gazprom not directly from factories, but through Putin's friends, is it corruption? And what about the Rosneft bond scams? What does corruption have to do with it when the system itself is built to enrich a narrow circle of people close to Putin personally? This is not corruption, everything is fair, there are tenders according to the law and all that. Vaughn and Tkachev's relatives "did not find a conflict of interest." What is he corrupt ???
    14. +17
      18 March 2016 07: 06
      If the government is not profitable to invest in the development of the economy of their country, then this government is unworthy to be the government of this country. Only resignation.
      1. +4
        18 March 2016 07: 12
        Quote: EvgNik
        Only resignation.

        How can you think that? Vladimir Putin - pleased with the actions of the government and the Central Bank, the State Duma also has no complaints against him. .. So everything goes on HHP and that's it .. where the question is already different ..
        1. +6
          18 March 2016 07: 22
          Quote: afdjhbn67

          How can you think that? Vladimir Putin - pleased with the actions of the government, the State Duma also has no complaints against him. .. So everything goes on HHP and that's it ..

          All right namesake! The scandal in the mines of the cult showed that our government is worth. Pass them through the "Lie detector", I think not a single honest will be.
          1. +2
            18 March 2016 08: 04
            Quote: Amurets
            The scandal in the mines of the cult showed that our government is worth. To pass them through the "Lie detector", I think not a single honest will be.

            ... through a "lie detector"?
            ... so let any of us - who are older than 30 years old - also will not be a single one!
        2. 0
          18 March 2016 08: 42
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          How can you think that? Vladimir Putin - pleased with the actions of the government and the Central Bank

          Unfortunately (or fortunately?) I am not Putin. Therefore, I do not think the way he thinks (or maybe he says not what he thinks).
          1. +3
            18 March 2016 12: 03
            Quote: EvgNik
            Unfortunately (or fortunately?) I am not Putin. Therefore, I do not think the way he thinks (or maybe he says not what he thinks).

            Therefore, we live as a profitable Putin, and not what you think))))
      2. +2
        18 March 2016 08: 26
        I agree with you, except for one, why the government?
        1. +1
          18 March 2016 14: 49
          Quote: Shurale
          I agree with you, except for one, why the government?

          Add another thought, what does that change? Name another president? We have no right, he is popularly elected and we simply have no right to insult him. To criticize - yes. Offend - no.
          1. +3
            18 March 2016 14: 58
            we simply have no right to insult him. To criticize - yes. Offend - no.


            "The president is a convenient puppet of those in power" - will this be an insult or criticism? laughing
            Ah, constructively necessary. Please, not a single action that goes against the interests of Potanin, Alikperov, .......... smile
            Poor adventurers Berezovsky, Gusinsky and the fact that he served (I do not remember) - do not give an example. They disturbed the clan. They didn’t fit, so to speak ..
      3. +4
        18 March 2016 11: 18
        Quote: EvgNik
        If the government is not profitable to invest in the development of the economy of their country, then this government is unworthy to be the government of this country. Only resignation.

        Good idea.
        It is possible to concretize: "If the government of the Russian Federation is unable to invest in the development of the country's economy, then this is no longer the Russian government, but a branch of the US Federal Reserve System. It is time for the country to create its own government."
        1. 0
          18 March 2016 16: 58
          Quote: olimpiada15
          It's time to create your own government in the country

          The government is appointed leader, with a rating of almost 90%. The approval rating of ALL branches of government is over 60%. Where is more popular? ))))
    15. +9
      18 March 2016 07: 09
      Fearing himself, the state invests currency in a foreign economy, and invests so that the risk is minimal

      When the state, represented by government officials and their consultants, does not know how to effectively use money in their own country, the question arises - which country do you work for and what people do you "care for" about?
      1. +6
        18 March 2016 07: 22
        Gennady! hi

        Judging by the nickname, you know who the company’s foreman is. And you would slap the foreman, who keeps the allowance from the enemy. Or they would have handed over to specialists from counterintelligence.
        soldier
        1. +2
          18 March 2016 08: 45
          Quote: My address
          And you would have slapped the foreman who keeps the contentment of the enemy

          Great comparison. To the very point!
    16. +4
      18 March 2016 07: 11
      "The American national debt is one of the most reliable financial instruments" - but not for Russia.
    17. +6
      18 March 2016 07: 14
      They save on raising salaries and pensions in order to invest hundreds of billions of rubles in US bonds.
      1. +7
        18 March 2016 08: 07
        Quote: L. A. A.
        They save on raising salaries and pensions in order to invest hundreds of billions of rubles in US bonds.

        "The sovereign cannot think about everyone, he should think about important things!"
    18. -5
      18 March 2016 07: 15
      If it were not for investments in American bonds in the fat years 2005-2013, then everyone would lick their paw now.
      1. +8
        18 March 2016 07: 23
        Quote: oldav
        If it were not for investments in American bonds in the fat years 2005-2013, then everyone would lick their paw now.

        If they were allowed in their "fat years" to develop their country, there would be no current situation in the economy.
        1. -1
          18 March 2016 12: 33
          Won in skolkovo invested and what ??. as well as on everything else, money will disappear. And in the USA they are saved in a piggy bank, by the way, we now live on them if that.
    19. +7
      18 March 2016 07: 17
      I remind you who is not in the subject: the Central Bank of Russia is the structure of the US Federal Reserve, which in turn is a private Jewish organization. Nabiulina in Russia does not obey anyone !!! The monopoly jurisdiction of the CBR includes maintaining the ruble exchange rate, setting interest rates, and the number of rubles in the Russian Federation.
      In fact, the president and ministers are talking heads; there is no possibility of economic processes in the country.
      Only a certain constitutional assembly (of which there is not even a law) can make changes to the CBR’s constitutional work. If you call things in your own words, Russia is the Fed’s economic colony.
      1. +3
        18 March 2016 12: 11
        Quote: SarS
        Nabiulina in Russia does not obey anyone !!!

        And who appointed her? You can not obey the government, but work in the interests of Russia. If she is a traitor to Russia, then why a) they will not remove her, b) the FSB will not put her in prison for 20 years? c) why does the president positively evaluate her work?
        I also do not obey Medvedev, this does not mean that I am a pest of Russia.
    20. -2
      18 March 2016 07: 18
      They did everything right. They invested in 2007-2012 at 30 rubles per dollar, when they took the dollar at 60-70 plus 3-5% per annum. Competent politics, what's wrong?
      1. +11
        18 March 2016 07: 35
        They did everything right. They invested in 2007-2012 at 30 rubles per dollar, when they took the dollar at 60-70 plus 3-5% per annum. Competent politics, what's wrong?

        They took what ????? If they increased it. We will buy sugar, put mash, we will expel moonshine, we will sell moonshine and we will drink money. That's the whole focus of Naibulina .E. and co.
      2. +2
        18 March 2016 08: 20
        Quote: oldav
        They did everything right. They invested in 2007-2012 at 30 rubles per dollar, when they took the dollar at 60-70 plus 3-5% per annum. Competent politics, what's wrong?

        Today - they took ... and "well taken"!
        ...And tomorrow?
        The US is close to a financial and economic crisis - or is already in it! They can - as they have done recently - declare their refusal to their obligations to creditors, they say - "we are in deep ass ...", Bolivar will not stand such a crowd ... And then - "... Sarah, what are the pennies?"
        1. 0
          18 March 2016 12: 15
          Quote: CONTROL
          SHA are close to the financial and economic crisis - or are already in it!

          Just don’t tell anyone about it! And then people urgently run bucks in rubles to change .. You are a genius. you are just God. the whole world is investing in the USA, China is the same ... and you have calculated everything .. You would have been, yes, the ministers of finance of Russia, but what is there, of the whole World!
        2. -1
          18 March 2016 12: 32
          I have heard about the collapse and crisis in the United States since 2008, but so far the crisis is only ours. The government is pulling the economy in a primitive way, but nonetheless pulling.
          1. 0
            18 March 2016 18: 12
            The crisis is not only with us, but throughout the world.
      3. +6
        18 March 2016 08: 51
        Quote: oldav
        They did everything right.

        Is buying up the assets of the largest debtor in the world the right policy? They bought up the shares of Ukraine, for, say, a small (for the state) amount, and how much we disentangle.
        1. -1
          18 March 2016 12: 58
          Quote: EvgNik
          Quote: oldav
          They did everything right.

          Is buying up the assets of the largest debtor in the world the right policy? They bought up the shares of Ukraine, for, say, a small (for the state) amount, and how much we disentangle.

          Yes, if the people of Alaska, under the guise of polite people, vote for joining Russia, then problems with the return of money will appear for sure)))
    21. +12
      18 March 2016 07: 23
      This is a tribute paid by Russia, like any other colony. And above everything is perfectly up to date ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
    22. The comment was deleted.
    23. +10
      18 March 2016 07: 34
      During perestroika we were also frightened by corruption, bureaucracy and other fairy tales. To these tales of Stephen King, we did not even sell, but gave away the Motherland. Now everyone is shouting about corruption. Yes, it is. Moreover, everywhere. And in the "most transparent" economy in the world, corruption is simply breathtaking. Only there it is called differently. Not even "cutting the budget", but simply an increase in defense spending. What do you call a yacht, so she hires everyone ... no. Do you think McCain hates Russia so much that snot bubbles by themselves? No, he's just heading the Senate Defense Committee, he needs an excuse for another cut.
      And about the Central Bank of the Russian Federation it is too late to be indignant. This office was created back in 1990, when no one suspected a future cut of the Union (in 1991). In 1993, this office made production in Russia senseless at a rate of 210%, and simultaneously with the rest of the Central Bank of the world for 3 months it created the global crisis of August 1998. This office with great difficulty endured the mattress crisis in 2008, did everything in 2012, so that Putin’s election would be as bad as possible and for 3 years now has created all the conditions for the crisis in our homeland. She is honest with her employers. Only they are under Art. 75 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation anywhere, but not in Russia.
    24. 0
      18 March 2016 07: 35
      Starikov wrote a hundred times, we pay tribute to the winners. Putin is moving towards freeing himself, but apparently not yet the time.
      1. +8
        18 March 2016 08: 24
        How many decades are you ready to wait until Putin will be able to achieve? ))))))))))))))))))))))))
    25. +9
      18 March 2016 07: 36
      In addition, the US paper has the highest degree of reliability.


      Who invented it what

      Americans change the rules as they want and the myth of the reliability of their papers causes me great doubt.
      1. +2
        18 March 2016 12: 22
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        Americans change the rules as they want and the myth of the reliability of their papers causes me great doubt.

        Do the Chinese know this?
      2. +1
        18 March 2016 12: 22
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        Americans change the rules as they want and the myth of the reliability of their papers causes me great doubt.

        Do the Chinese know this?
        1. +1
          18 March 2016 13: 51
          Quote: Al1977
          Do the Chinese know this?

          request The Chinese have nowhere else to invest, the rest of the currencies are the same as trash with the external debts that the holder countries have. And dollars are the main currency of the main consumer of Chinese goods. It is unclear what we consume such amersky all the time, what do we buy for bucks? Why not in euro calculations, for example, why buy paper - when you can buy the necessary resources, minds, patents, production?
          1. 0
            18 March 2016 14: 08
            Quote: Corsair
            The Chinese have nowhere else to invest, other currencies are the same trash

            And why does this criterion not suit us?
    26. +7
      18 March 2016 07: 46
      The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money

      What the hell is this government still in its seats ???
      1. +4
        18 March 2016 08: 22
        Good question !
        It would be great if more people would ask him ...
    27. +8
      18 March 2016 07: 48
      What awaits the country if the financial and economic block is the office of the Russian State Scam
      They do not work, but are engaged in the manipulation of finance.
      The effectiveness of external investments, and interest-free, is that after dropping the ruble exchange rate, they return back as much as they want.
      $ 90 billion at a rate of 30 rubles / $ will be 2.7 trillion rubles, at 70 rubles / $ - 5,6 trillion rubles. - that’s the whole efficiency of the country's chief financier.
      At the same time, a Russian having put 20 thousand rubles in the bank at a rate of 30 r / $, having come to the store a year later, will no longer be able to buy a computer for 20 thousand rubles. So who is stimulated by the Central Bank and at whose expense?
      1. +5
        18 March 2016 08: 08
        What awaits the country if the financial and economic block is the office of the Russian State Scam

        Absolutely right...
        Rewind the history of RUSSIA ...
        always the Russian people were saving themselves from excess money in this way and the current government of RUSSIA cares mainly about bankers-usurers than about a simple citizen of RUSSIA ...
        originally laid the fundamental contradiction (mine) under our state.
    28. +5
      18 March 2016 07: 56
      If you are afraid that you will not be able to control the waste of money that you invest somewhere, then you are a bad boss. It’s easier for someone to give them away, to wait for interest, and when this someone throws it, screaming that we were deceived. But the fun logic of our financiers: in the USA and in Russia this money can disappear, only in the USA this money can bring a little income, but in Russia they will probably disappear wink
    29. +1
      18 March 2016 08: 03
      Gentlemen, let's be sober. What happened now as a result of the sanctions? And the fact that refinancing in the west is no longer allowed. And the loans collected by corporations and banks will have to be repaid. There were about $ 500 billion of them left (it was in the 14th under 800!), That's where the ambush was! However, the Central Bank has built such a scheme of interaction that it supplies borrowers with currency INSIDE the country, WITHOUT DECREASING gold and foreign exchange reserves. And the debt is decreasing and decreasing, while the gold and foreign exchange reserves froze at approximately 380, and are still standing. And in what to keep them? Not in paper dollars? By the way, we continue to buy gold very quickly, but the world price of gold is kept at a low level by the teeth, so it is difficult to turn it into hard currency. And you can quickly sell "traders" on the stock exchange. Such is the "mudflow" at the moment, and how we were not dragged into "default" is simply amazing.
      And no one rushed to help Russia with an open wallet, especially our "dear China". And he tried to "warm up the hands" on our difficulties. Well, Russia has no allies except the army and the navy. So they are investing money in the military-industrial complex, hoping that it will pull our economy out of the "swamp" of the raw material economy, when there are tens of millions of sellers in the country, and far fewer producers.
    30. +8
      18 March 2016 08: 04
      Who should lead the country's economy?
      1) the task of an effective manager is to show a good financial result.
      He comes up with ways to withdraw money.
      A win-win option is a price increase, an endless population object, especially housing and communal services.
      There was a gas tariff, including gas, maintenance of equipment of subscribers.
      They shared, for the same amount of gas, for a separate service contract and payment.
      And the prices have not been raised, and the population needs to pay more. Focus.
      2) the task of the production manager for the production to work, releasing more goods in demand.
      The product-money-product formula works. This means the purchase of raw materials, jobs, equipment maintenance, modernization, stimulating supply and demand.
      This is an economic development.
      So who should solve economic issues within the state?
      Does the government need effective managers? The USA needs effective managers in Russia. And what about Russia?
    31. +5
      18 March 2016 08: 09
      "Moscow's investment of currency in its native economy will rather lead to a new round of corruption than to the development of the domestic economy and industry. At least, some experts think so."
      Consequently, instead of a real fight against corruption, our liberalistic rulers will feed the American economy, and indeed any other Western one, than raise their own from the ruins! Wonderful prospects!
    32. +2
      18 March 2016 08: 13
      IMHO. The benefits for the Russian economy in the purchase of US government securities
      not as obvious as the benefits of supporting the US economy.
    33. -2
      18 March 2016 08: 15
      By the new term of corruption ...
      Judging by the media reports, the trays of corruption are no less, and even, it seems to me, more.
      Dictionary on the phone and fixed on a tray, hi ...
    34. +1
      18 March 2016 08: 20
      Here. Instead of maintaining the standard of living of the population at least at the "pre-crisis" level, they are investing in amers. It would be better if salaries were indexed according to inflation.
    35. +6
      18 March 2016 08: 21
      “The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money.

      It's simple, we have long observed that the state almost does not invest available money in the country's economy, these cases are so rare that they can not be considered. But the waste of money on everything else is amazing, help to neighboring and non-neighboring states, all kinds of wars, etc. From which we can conclude that those who make Russia and are not going to develop it, where they are going to spend the available money, they have already shown to their masters - to the west, which they are doing with enviable constancy.

      Do you need such state leaders?

      Buying up American bonds, Russia lends to America and “holds on to the hook” the strongest economy in the world.

      Bullshit. The ant holds the foot of the elephant and screams - I hold it !!!!
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 11: 02
        Quote: Shurale
        “The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money.

        It's simple, we have long observed that the state almost does not invest available money in the country's economy, these cases are so rare that they can not be considered. But the waste of money on everything else is amazing, help to neighboring and non-neighboring states, all kinds of wars, etc. From which we can conclude that those who make Russia and are not going to develop it, where they are going to spend the available money, they have already shown to their masters - to the west, which they are doing with enviable constancy.

        And the state should not -
        a) increase salaries to employees of private enterprises (in other words - did they start capitalism in Russia?);
        b) well, pensions are possible - we will add 400 r ... by the new Year! may be...
        c) civil servants do not forget to raise their salaries: for deputies (oh! ...) ... well, you don’t live on 1,5 lemon, heartburn torments ...
        d) invest in projects for the development of this and the construction of this: of course ... but who will do it? and control the execution? ... Ah-ah-ah ... well, then put in the project budget 250% on top of "saws" and "kickbacks" ...
        e) ... e) ... up to itd ....
        1. 0
          18 March 2016 14: 01
          And the state should not -
          a) increase the salaries of employees of private enterprises (otherwise - did figs start up capitalism in Russia?);

          it doesn’t matter for us whether you are a pensioner of private capital or state capital, everyone pays contributions to private pension funds and private traders and state. - What does paragraph a) have to do with it?
          b) well, pensions are possible - we will add 400 r ... by the new Year! may be...

          why is it possible? I think it is necessary because, thanks to our state, the central bank, by its presence, creates constant inflation, which not only reduces the cost of money initially, but also leads to the subsequent rise in price of everything else in the chain - energy - goods ... What you wanted to say in point b) I did not understand.
          c) civil servants do not forget to raise their salaries: for deputies (oh! ...) ... well, you don’t live on 1,5 lemon, heartburn torments ...

          what does it have to do with it? the conversation was about the development of domestic industry in gosudartsve, where does the civil servants and even more so officials with 1 500 000 rubles in salary ... What you wanted to say in paragraph c) I did not understand ...
          d) invest in projects for the development of this and the construction of this: of course ... but who will do it? and control the execution? ... Ah-ah-ah ... well, then put in the project budget 250% on top of "saws" and "kickbacks" ...

          firstly, the state must create a financial situation in the country in which doing business would be profitable. And at the expense of investing and financing, it didn’t go to bed and does it in 99% of cases to get personal profit for those who start it, this is called corruption, to eradicate corruption it is necessary to adopt some laws that are among those that apply to me -
          the state must create a financial situation in the country in which doing business would be profitable

          This is one of the main parameters. If there will be no cuts or kickbacks, is this again the duty of the state? and you say that cuts and kickbacks will prevent the government from fighting cuts and kickbacks, which means that the government and the one above it must be removed.
          1. 0
            18 March 2016 14: 31
            Quote: Shurale
            the state must create a financial situation in the country in which doing business would be profitable

            This is one of the main parameters. If there will be no cuts or kickbacks, is this again the duty of the state? and you say that cuts and kickbacks will prevent the government from fighting cuts and kickbacks, which means that the government and the one above it must be removed.

            The government's financial and economic bloc is liberal! As they were taught - they do it! As a result, attempts (unsuccessful) to slow down inflation with a "free floating ruble rate", rates on industrial loans - "long money" - the Central Bank ... Control over foreign exchange investments, tax press - this is the government; well, and there ...
            As a result - and not as a result of sanctions !, namely because of the policy of the Central Bank and the government to attract foreign investment and interest in the bottom of foreign investors - Russia has become a rogue country! The lowest level of foreign investment (don’t ask for links, I don’t collect and don’t collect them; those who want it - read the favorite ones on the website of Sulakshin, Delyagin, Glazyev, Katasonov - each of them has their own vision of problems, their own recipes and solutions to problems; but sometimes diametrically opposed views - you can try to extract rational grain! a lot of grains ... almost a crop ... enough for a bread (?) ...
            Or for example: http://kob.su/lekcii/petrov/ekonomika-chast-i
    36. +2
      18 March 2016 08: 30
      Of course, the Americans will repay the debt ..... they will print pieces of paper and repay .....
    37. +1
      18 March 2016 08: 33
      For them, Russia is a client. It will be in plus or minus, it does not bother them much, the main thing is that they will receive from this client in the form of a commission. How else can one explain the simultaneous purchase of American debt and the sale of its own. For them, movement is important, it doesn’t matter what is at a loss for Russia.
    38. +9
      18 March 2016 08: 49
      The embezzlers should be shot, with property confiscated, not fables to tell and not to invest Russian money in the economy of an enemy state, from which Russia should not expect anything good.
      1. +2
        18 March 2016 09: 08
        as the GDP said - if they are shot, then with whom will he work? laughing
        1. +8
          18 March 2016 09: 20
          In Russia there are more than one hundred million people, you can find someone to work with if you look, and not grind nonsense and do not look for your stupidity and laziness, rotten cheap excuses that have nothing to do with reality.
        2. +2
          18 March 2016 14: 57
          Quote: satelit24
          if they are shot, then with whom will he work?

          Do they work? In my opinion, only rob. Well, maybe we call it work, maybe. And Chubais is the most hard-working and indispensable (when state money needs to be cut).
    39. +4
      18 March 2016 08: 53
      "Experts explain" ... by the high yield and protection of these securities. What kind of profitability are we talking about? These US securities do not have a yield, the "yield" in general is somewhere around 0,3% per annum maximum! and then depending on the regulated price at the time of their purchase. In addition, about their "reliability": the Americans really do not "arrest" them ..., but only when buying and storing them, but when selling them ... when you sell them, the proceeds can be arrested "easily". By the way, Iran also had these "pieces of paper" and tried to sell them, but the problem is that they can ONLY be sold to the United States, the Americans bought them and immediately "froze" the money received by Iran.
    40. +4
      18 March 2016 09: 03
      We invest our money in the American economy, and we ourselves lend to American banks at high interest rates. Iron logic.
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 18: 19
        This is what American banks we are lending to - this shop has been closed for 2 years.
    41. +7
      18 March 2016 09: 04
      Disputes about nothing. The government works extremely ineffectively, actually does not know how to work. THE LAWYER did not create an effective instrument (apparatus). The directors still somehow solve the current problems, and there is no talk about building the economy at all. The prime minister's words "must be done" are simply touching, but excuse me, what subject was he appointed to the post? It looks like Wall Street is driving our government, plus the politicization of financial and economic relations, plus nepotism and corruption. And one more aspect - there is a suspicion that there is a war for loot in power. I listen to TV - on a mobile phone, peremoga - after decades of robbing people, the State Duma deigned to take care of the harm from financial pyramids, the question is - why did they allow fraudsters to profit for so long? I will not ask the question for how much. It boiled.
    42. +6
      18 March 2016 09: 06
      Finally, our government said that it was completely stolen and stalled.
      1. +1
        18 March 2016 14: 11
        Quote: igorv501
        Finally, our government said that it was completely stolen and stalled.

        Will you vote for another in the election?
    43. +4
      18 March 2016 09: 14
      According to the expert, in Russia it is necessary to create financial instruments and invest normally in your economy, in infrastructure projects. If you finance them directly, “there may be big costs,” namely the “corruption component”
      Here is what to do and one hell, no one does anything. Of course, it's easier to invest money in a profitable (as some believe) business and wait for dividends. They also talk about the "hook" on which Russia will keep America, there and without us there is someone to hold it. It is clear from everything that no one wants to engage in their economic strategy, and perhaps even cannot, and this is not good.
    44. 3vs
      -1
      18 March 2016 09: 17
      I think the author’s sarcasm is not appropriate here!

      Most people here are unlikely to understand this financial kitchen.
      Again, I propose to repost here the article of the notorious crimsonalter
      under the heading "Once again about American bonds and" lending to the US economy "":
      http://crimsonalter.livejournal.com/88386.html

      A person understands something in this, unlike us and our deputies ...
      1. +1
        18 March 2016 11: 51
        In this article, in my opinion, one message. "Everyone does that. And we are worse than them!"
      2. +2
        18 March 2016 21: 35
        Quote: 3vs
        Most people here are unlikely to understand this financial kitchen.

        And what is there to understand, money is the blood of the economy.
        The concept of bleeding is clear to everyone.
    45. 0
      18 March 2016 09: 18
      If China, the largest investor in US Treasury bonds, begins to withdraw them due to the threat of losing money, this is fraught with the collapse of the entire US financial system. And if Russia joins this process, it turns out that the end justifies the means. These are two.
      Buying up American bonds, Russia lends to America and “holds on to the hook” the strongest economy in the world.

      The state is afraid of corruption ... in the state. Fearing himself, the state is investing currency in a foreign economy. This is a time.
      H / s?
      I don’t understand how this is possible!
    46. +3
      18 March 2016 09: 18
      The state’s policy has not changed for 15 years already, the faces are practically the same as in the Duma and in the government. A new political force is needed, a party with state views. Then the money will be at home!
    47. +5
      18 March 2016 09: 21
      Very true, in my opinion, comments on this event. But what is the author of the article to blame? Why minus it? He retold the answers of officials involved in the flow of our money into the American economy.
      And there is nothing new in this event. Our current leaders, as they have invested our money in the American economy, and continue to do so. The competent authorities should have asked them questions long ago. But where are those competent? They themselves are allowed to participate in corruption schemes, therefore "no violations of the legislation of the Russian Federation were revealed as a result of the inspection ...".
      But what else, except for a personal interest, can explain the injection of our money into a foreign economy, in the context of waging an economic and political war against us?
      Most recently, the media discussed the likelihood of a $ 3 billion return to Ukraine. And although it was clear that these funds would not be returned to us (even in court), the Central Bank continued to pour our money into its subsidiary banks in Ukraine ....
      "Deliver me, Lord, from such friends, and I can handle the enemies myself."
      1. +2
        18 March 2016 12: 28
        Yes, the author did not need to write anything, they have been arguing about this for a long time. It was enough to write the sentence "Let's discuss the topic of investing our money in the US national debt." I think it would be the same. And the author transformed the proposal into an article.
        And further. I believe that competent authorities have not yet been created for our leaders. There is a government sitting. He writes anti-crisis plans. Has anyone heard anything about the specifics?
    48. +4
      18 March 2016 09: 35
      "Buying up American bonds, Russia gives America a loan and" keeps on the hook "the strongest economy in the world" - congenial! They paid tribute to the horde, and so they took it by the breast! "Big got caught !!!" - thought the gudgeon, swallowing the hook and feeling a strong man's hand.
    49. Old
      +2
      18 March 2016 09: 39
      Need a rotation of power. Otherwise, do not destroy this vicious circle. It is necessary to plant friends, girlfriends, their children, relatives. Well, who will do it? it’s necessary to clean the prosecutor’s office, plant Churov (and he has state awards), but all thieves and corrupt officials have state awards! Who issued these awards? what to do with it? One pain! And the recipe for the fight against theft is only one.
    50. +1
      18 March 2016 09: 41
      Quote: Beard
      Why can’t you lend to your industry? Under the real percentage, under specific projects. Not under 25%, and not Chubais' theft?
      And who told you that the real economy is not credited? Please get loans for real assets at 2,5% in dollars or euros at many of our banks. Just do not juggle with% rates, or in Europe already give loans in rubles at 2%? If in Europe inflation is 0% then you get a loan at 2,5%. And if in Russia 10% inflation, then you get a loan in 25%, what logic do you not see?
    51. +2
      18 March 2016 09: 43
      Quote: sa-zz
      Moscow’s investment of currency in its native economy will likely lead to a new round of corruption, rather than to the development of the domestic economy and industry

      O. Kh. To have an argument.
      Nabiulina did not come to explain?

      What is happening, the government is cutting spending in 2016 on the defense industry, healthcare, social services, due to a lack of money, and throws it into mattress papers at a very small percentage. What is this called: sabotage, sabotage, treason to the Motherland???
    52. +1
      18 March 2016 09: 49
      "By buying American bonds, Russia lends money to America and keeps the world's strongest economy on the hook."

      Who are these fairy tales for?
      Who else believes in them?
    53. 0
      18 March 2016 10: 09
      In fact, if you sell massively, the price falls, then you need to buy in order to sell later when the price rises. We must not forget that in fact the rates are set by large currency speculators, the same ones who were shot in Soviet times (which I would only welcome). Another thing is how skillfully and efficiently all this is done.
    54. +2
      18 March 2016 10: 14
      "and the government “never came up with anything better than investing it in American bonds.”

      “The fact is that inside the country they simply do not know where to invest this money
      "...

      Mmm... And that says it all...

      By the way, why do they always say “investing in US securities”???

      Investments involve investing money in order to make a profit.... This is a classic...

      What profit did the treasury and the Russian economy receive from these debt securities???

      I still see that they (Russian money) work for the US economy...

      And no amount of China and Japan, the leaders in the purchase of these bonds, will convince me of the usefulness of these candy wrappers for Russia...

      We all have our own paths of development, our own problems and our own ways to solve them... There is no need to take an example from someone, that’s enough, we’ve already seen enough and “taken the example”, as evidenced by the destruction of many industries in our country...

      Money should work for your country... And a thief (or saboteur) should be in prison... Something like this...
    55. +3
      18 March 2016 10: 18
      “The fact is that inside the country they simply don’t know where to invest this money”...
      ..Moscow’s investment of foreign currency in its native economy is more likely to lead to a new round of corruption than to the development of the domestic economy and industry. At least that's what some experts think.

      We are not rich enough to have cheap experts.
    56. The comment was deleted.
    57. 0
      18 March 2016 10: 35
      You need to “whist” wisely!
    58. +3
      18 March 2016 10: 40
      I don’t know how it is in economics...but I always thought that the most reliable reserves of the state are the industrial base, infrastructure and people....and not securities with a 100500% markup due to air and the mood of a certain John Smith. ..exchange trader.
      1. +2
        18 March 2016 14: 19
        Quote: Alexander S.
        I don’t know how it is in economics...but I always thought that the most reliable reserves of the state are the industrial base, infrastructure and people....and not securities with a 100500% markup due to air and the mood of a certain John Smith. ..exchange trader.

        So who said they don’t invest in people? Some under Putin have greatly increased their capitalization. They also pour money into AvtoVAZ every year, and into Rosneft. And the infrastructure is like in Moscow, we have changed the curbs three times in a year, Tverskaya will be covered with tiles for the third time. So they invest “where they need to be”)))
    59. +1
      18 March 2016 10: 42
      Moscow’s investment of currency in the home economy will most likely lead to a new round of corruption, rather than to the development of domestic economy and industry. At least some experts think so.

      This is actually called lobbying, and experts are the main employees of lobbying organizations, but as for corruption, why is everyone so indignant, because this is also a kind of business, money for a service. wink
    60. 0
      18 March 2016 10: 45
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      One way out: to declare at the highest level that stealing is a sin and a shame!

      so Putin already said ... and even threatened with a finger ...- are not afraid!


      And then you have to shoot!
    61. STN
      +1
      18 March 2016 10: 54
      Who will allow us to invest our earned money in our economy? And even for the development of technology? A colony of the West is just that: a colony. Why does it seem to me that this is why we have a large shadow turnover (that’s why many people who steal are not imprisoned) we need to invest in our country in some cunning way.
      1. +1
        18 March 2016 13: 55
        Quote: STN
        Why does it seem to me that this is why there is a large shadow trade in our country (that’s why many people who steal are not imprisoned) you have to invest in your country in some cunning way.


        Hmm... judging by your statement, it is high time for people like Chubais, Serdyukov, Vasilyeva and others like them to be awarded the newly introduced title of Hero of Labor for their great cunning contribution to the cunning economy...
    62. 0
      18 March 2016 11: 29
      Thus, by investing another portion of dough into the economy of pendostana, Russia is digging a debt hole for swindlers. But as usual in fairy tales, this beast, as usual, bypasses this hole, laughing at the stupid hunter.
    63. +2
      18 March 2016 11: 37
      As I understand it, Russia does not have enough population to develop domestic consumption. Foreign markets are closed to us, except for certain types of raw materials and products. We already sell grain more than others; they don’t need steel and rolled products. It is difficult to develop fruit and vegetable production due to the climate. Previously, under Soviet rule, tomatoes and cucumbers were eaten only in season, and then, in cities, they were mainly imported from Bulgaria and Hungary. They ate cabbage, potatoes, carrots and summer preparations. Tangerines come from Abkhazia in winter, pineapples are also only available in winter. Now we want strawberries and pineapples all year round. Well, they don’t grow here!! The world economy is now stagnating - there is overproduction of everything, and the poor are starving because they cannot earn money. We need currency to purchase technologies and goods that we do not yet have. It’s like in the 30s, when it was necessary to carry out industrialization, and the Americans sold us machines and equipment only for grain (the reason for the notorious famine), they didn’t even take gold. Now the American is going to abolish cash altogether, only electronic payments. Therefore, you can only hold stock in debt securities. We need to invest in infrastructure and housing construction, but the payback period is long.
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 14: 03
        Quote: Winter cherry
        Previously, under Soviet rule, tomatoes and cucumbers were eaten only in season, and then only in cities. mainly imported from Bulgaria and Hungary.


        Hmm... You probably don't fully understand the situation... In the fields where tomatoes and cucumbers grew (and not only them), after selective harvesting, cows and pigs were grazed, which trampled more than they devoured...

        And the townspeople were offered buses on weekends - go, clean up, take it for yourself...

        And all only because it was necessary to feed (that is, let them earn) the same Hungarians and Bulgarians...

        Almost a quarter of a century has passed... Where are the new canning factories in the same Kuban-Stavropol region, as well as in the Rostov region??? These regions have exactly the climate that vegetables and fruits need...

        This is how Polish and Hungarian confiture jams are still in stores, made from who knows what, with a poisonous color and an incomprehensible taste...

        Well, most of the Russian population can live without pineapples all year round; this is not an essential product...

        Mismanagement, and not the climate, is the reason for all this bacchanalia...
    64. +2
      18 March 2016 11: 41
      In addition, the US paper has the highest degree of reliability.

      This is true, but only if you dance to their tune. And if you have your own opinion, then these investments can easily turn into a whip
      1. 0
        20 March 2016 21: 52
        Quote: jetfors_84
        In addition, the US paper has the highest degree of reliability.

        This is true, but only if you dance to their tune. And if you have your own opinion, then these attachments easily turn into a whip

        How is this possible?

        Let's say the United States refused to buy back/pay interest on the treasuries to the Russian Federation.

        This is a signal for, for example, China (I hope you don’t think that China is “dancing” to someone else’s tune?). China has these treasuries, no lie, worth about 1.3 trillion greenbacks.

        If China decides to get rid of them (even if only partially!) (and does) it will be a pain in the ass for the States. If China is also refused, this is a signal for all treasury holders... and this, in the extreme, is the collapse of the dollar, no matter how you look at it.

        The States cannot do this, understand already request
    65. +1
      18 March 2016 11: 45
      Indeed, it is very difficult for even an ordinary Russian to understand our Russian patriotic Central Bank. It is impossible to invest money in the Russian economy because corruption will rise. Let this corruption rise in the USA, that’s where we will invest our billions, we will make it worse for the USA. Is this a purely patriotic act? No, this is on the verge of sabotage. But we are talking about our Central Bank, a Russian bank. He should take care of our economy. State Duma deputies shrug their shoulders, entrepreneurs are also perplexed. And the answer is apparently buried in who our Central Bank actually reports to, who governs it in his own interests, and doesn’t give a damn about the whole of Russia. After all, the United States has set the task of slowing down the development of Russia, so “ours and not ours” the Central Bank is fulfilling it. Subtle and effective.
    66. 0
      18 March 2016 12: 02
      ..."We can assume, we will add on our own, that the state is afraid of corruption... in the state. Fearing itself, the state invests currency in foreign economies.... good
      This is the first and second, it seems to me that ours are starting to flirt with mattress covers. I don’t know if this is a tactical move or a strategic one? request
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 14: 05
        Quote: vladimirvn
        I don’t know if this is a tactical move or a strategic one?


        Traitorous towards his country and his people...
    67. +1
      18 March 2016 12: 11
      The fact that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is a branch of the US Treasury and is subject to the policies of the Federal Reserve System is well known.
      States are governed by politics.
      Politics is driven by money.
      And with money - Wall Street and London City.
      Thus, the Russian Federation is as “sovereign” as it is “independent”.
      And it’s up to the players to decide who to pit against whom, what pieces to move on the board.
      So, if the Central Bank says: “Lumin”, or rather, American pieces of paper, that means pieces of paper. And no prosperity for our own industry: there is no money for this! We need to support US banks and companies! Show your patriotism! Or do our bankers and civil servants not have foreign citizenship? What about their relatives?
      Here is the answer to the Duma deputies' request. And they have no business pestering their foreign colleagues. Colleagues will be silent, silent... And then, r-time! And already next to other colleagues who will not only give up Crimea, but also sell off all of Russia piece by piece, along with the population they hate...
      They despise this country. They would have Hitler to help them.
      What kind of investment? What? What they buried in their little soul long ago?
    68. +1
      18 March 2016 12: 39
      Moscow’s investment of currency in the home economy will most likely lead to a new round of corruption, rather than to the development of domestic economy and industry. At least some experts think so.
      Interesting logic, but maybe we should start imprisoning people for life and confiscating property for corruption?
    69. +2
      18 March 2016 12: 55
      The problem with these investments is twofold. First of all, they are unplanned. And secondly, they must be LIQUID. Roughly speaking, if you were given a big bonus at work, then you have two options. “Invest” it in the family - eat it, buy a new refrigerator, send the child to a good section. Or invest it in a “stash”. But the problem is that there is a crisis economic situation at your work. Either they pay a bonus, or their wages are delayed. And you also have a mortgage (pensioners), a car loan (social security) and permanent home repairs (military expenses). What will happen? what if your salary is delayed next month? If you have “stashed away” the bonus, you will hold out until it is finally given out. What if you spent it? You will be left with an empty new refrigerator, with a hungry child who came home from the cool section, with an unpaid mortgage and loan, and with a leaking roof. What's better?
      They will tell me, what if I invest money in my business? Or, rather, invest in the business (new state plant) of the “rogue son-in-law” (Abramovich, Chubais). They will bring a lot of income (perhaps) someday. But the income will come some time later, but you may need the money in a month. And the son-in-law, the bastard, “is not responsible for your obligations.”
      So you have to go to Sberbank (Treasury Bank), which is the most reliable, and deposit money at a minimum interest rate in a demand deposit so that at least some interest accrues.
      In a capitalist economy, unfortunately, it will not work out any other way. Either fat or lean. In a socialist economy, everything is somewhat simpler. Everyone there is “responsible for all obligations.” And if somewhere there has been a loss (oil prices have fallen), then somewhere else you can withdraw excess profits (from AvtoVAZ) and survive the period of crisis. Therefore, you can freely plan for 5-10-15-20 years in advance. So the actions of the government in the capitalist paradigm are absolutely logical. And the only thing I blame GDP for is the refusal to return to socialism.
    70. 0
      18 March 2016 13: 09
      This article is absolutely incomprehensible to me. its meaning, as I understand it, boils down to this. that our authorities are afraid to invest money in our economy because they are afraid that corruption will develop on this basis. But this is absurd, childish talk, there are enough competent authorities at the state’s disposal, if you can’t figure out how to color the money being introduced into the economy, why not roll up your sleeves and catch a couple of figures. Then - why not invest this money in education and healthcare? Unclear! Let them explain it to the people, but truthfully and EVIDENTLY.
    71. 0
      18 March 2016 13: 18
      "...We can assume, let's add on our own, that the state is afraid of corruption... in the state. Fearing itself, the state invests currency in foreign economies..."

      Those in power are afraid of responsibility, they are afraid of the country, they are afraid of the people, the army... They are afraid of the Washington “city committee”.
      They are afraid of everything...
      It’s easier to write what “THEY” are not afraid of.
      They are not afraid of God and their conscience.
    72. +1
      18 March 2016 13: 33
      What can we say, two lawyers in power understand the economy, well, they don’t understand it at all, the government’s rotten eggs in the form of the economic bloc have been around for almost two years now, they cannot say exactly when and in what way the economy can be raised and when the crisis will be over, which is confirmed by the data this article and Sulakshin’s article on the role of the president in the development of the country, which clearly shows that the person has completely failed domestic policy, in particular the economy, and here you can add personnel, ideology, etc. Remember Peskov’s favorite statement, this is not the Kremlin’s business, this The Kremlin is not interested, but for some reason, everything that is happening is very interesting to the RUSSIAN PEOPLE, who over the past two years have sharply become POOR due to stupid, incompetent, and sometimes simply criminal actions of the authorities and the government. You can recall the role of the individual in history, it turns out that our leaders are now dragging history into the SWAMP and the life that exists now, reality shows that this is the TRUTH and there is no clearing visible.
    73. 0
      18 March 2016 14: 05
      The author described an illogical argument that calms the public, pointing out that the United States will be afraid to seize our securities on the grounds that, supposedly, if our securities are seized, large investors - China and Japan - will suddenly be afraid of this and sell their bonds. Both China and Japan are so attached to the American economy that selling American bonds would cause the collapse of their economies, so they will never do this, calmly watching how the hegemon strangles its weak, gullible and stupid client.
    74. 0
      18 March 2016 14: 15
      Quote: Sukhov
      Americans are "stupid"!

      I agree! But you can’t even understand Russians with your mind. Why are we cutting necessary items in the budget, raising pensions by pennies, and sending money abroad - financially supporting potential opponents! negative hi
    75. 0
      18 March 2016 14: 18
      With respect, Obamach, we love you very much in Russia....
    76. +1
      18 March 2016 14: 18
      Citizens from the economic bloc in the government reason like this: “If you invest money in the economy of your country, they will steal it!” Well, they judge by themselves. If they were given money for some projects, they would immediately steal it. The thieves' anti-people power cannot do it any other way.
    77. 0
      18 March 2016 14: 27
      When it starts “...such a booze...” then USA will not be afraid if it gets impatient to “... cut the last cucumber.”
      The arguments of the “IC...sperts” are paid for by the same Judeo-American “financial and economic system” in which they take part and with which they “IC...sperts” therefore exist.
      THEY “Abzalovs, Artyom Zvyagilskys, Pavel Khoroshilovs, Vladislav Kochetkovs, ...” themselves will not cut the branch on which they sit and “crow”.
    78. 0
      18 March 2016 16: 02
      Quote: Möbius
      And Iran survived. So why do you think that Russia does not have mobilization resources and the will to survive?

      Iran has internal “strengths” in the form of Muslim unity. It is very doubtful that their local religious leaders would behave in life as if the sanctions did not concern them.
      In Russia, our “believing” leaders are persistently looking for such bonds, but they call on others to tighten their belts. They themselves do not want to give up even a share of their benefits.
      That is why the Russian government will not survive if the sanctions increase.
      By the way, the “stupid” West understands this very well. And he is very afraid that instead of cosmetic correction of the Russian elite, its destruction by the people will begin. Anti-people power will collapse.
      That is why the sanctions are very cautious.
      The USSR would have survived, but Russia no longer exists.
      1. 0
        18 March 2016 18: 26
        Nothing will collapse - this has all happened more than once - you asked the people whether the people need new “happiness”, the answer will be one - NO.
    79. -1
      18 March 2016 16: 22
      Quote: sa-zz
      Moscow’s investment of currency in its native economy will likely lead to a new round of corruption, rather than to the development of the domestic economy and industry

      O. Kh. To have an argument.
      Nabiulina did not come to explain?

      There was no order from Fashington to come and explain! No.
    80. +2
      18 March 2016 17: 34
      Quote: sa-zz
      Moscow’s investment of currency in its native economy will likely lead to a new round of corruption, rather than to the development of the domestic economy and industry

      O. Kh. To have an argument.
      Nabiulina did not come to explain?

      And that corruption has now disappeared in our country?) In my opinion, just as they cut the budget, they will continue to cut and cut. As for Nabiulina.
      It’s not for nothing that she was recognized as the best head of the Central Bank in the world, because she does everything right on the part of our “partners” - she doesn’t give money for the development of our industry, everything is logical. So who is she after that? As for me, this is Russia’s enemy No. 1, and the rest are already known - D. Medvedev and Co...
    81. 0
      18 March 2016 18: 07
      That's who owns the Federal Reserve Bank, and therefore the United States.
      Goldman Sachs, Rockefeller, Lechman and Queen Loebs in New York.
      Rothschild in Paris and London. Warburg in Hamburg.
      Lazard in Paris. Israel Moses in Rome.
      And if in more detail -
      http://oko-planet.su/politik/politiklist/103737-komu-prinadlezhit-federalnaya-
      rezervnaya-sistemafrs-ssha.html
    82. VB
      +3
      18 March 2016 19: 11
      If the government does not invest money in its economy for fear of theft, then this government in its entirety, together with its president, who allowed this to happen, must resign and let the people elect a new government and a new president. The best remedy for dandruff is the guillotine.
    83. +2
      18 March 2016 20: 25

      So, let us note in conclusion that the basis for the corresponding decisions of the Central Bank is the reliability and liquidity of American securities. Apparently, this is well understood not only in Russia, but also in China and Japan, whose investments in US government bonds exceed a trillion

      You just need to take into account that the industry and manufactured goods (from jeans to robotic conveyors) of China and Japan are purchased all over the world! And ours?..
      The profit received from investing in bonds is lazy profit, it is money that brings money, but not real goods, jobs and everything else.
      And if the government is afraid of corruption and ineffective use, then this can be solved in an elementary way, you just need to give the green light to the Investigative Committee, the FSB, the police in order to resolve these issues, regardless of rank, rank or relationship.
    84. The comment was deleted.
    85. +2
      18 March 2016 22: 20
      “The American national debt is one of the most reliable financial instruments, to which there are simply no alternatives” - this is simply a betrayal of national interests! For some reason we attract foreign investors everywhere, while we ourselves feed the Americans - nonsense OR BETRAYAL???!!!
    86. 0
      19 March 2016 03: 23
      Quote: Möbius
      By God! The Maidan will ... Fail me in the place where I am sitting laughing

      Get lost with a whistle.
    87. -1
      19 March 2016 03: 38
      Quote: Centurion1
      "Buying up American bonds, Russia gives America a loan and" keeps on the hook "the strongest economy in the world" - congenial! They paid tribute to the horde, and so they took it by the breast! "Big got caught !!!" - thought the gudgeon, swallowing the hook and feeling a strong man's hand.

      What does tribute have to do with it? This is a currency investment tool, which is simply better in the world (this is the world) now.

      Are such actions politically and ideologically correct? It's a big question.
      Is it necessary to change a world (financial system) where the most reliable way to preserve foreign exchange reserves is to invest them in the US national debt? Necessary! This is happening - slowly, gradually, with the participation, first of all, of those same Russia and China. But changing the world is not a matter of chattering on a forum. We need to get away from the mediation of the dollar in the global economy, and this is very difficult.

      Domestic investment should not exceed the economy's ability to absorb it. We are building roads and factories. Funding for the army has been increased exponentially. There are very significant investments in R&D.

      The situation, in other words, is this: even during a crisis, foreign exchange earnings exceed the capabilities of the country’s economy. really master. This suggests that there are significant bottlenecks in the economy. This needs to be “treated.” However, until the power of economic “channels” increases, it is simply impossible to allow currency flow through them. There is a concept of “economic overheating”. This is if on the fingers.
      Here is an article on Wikipedia to understand at least something at a meager level:
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Перегрев_экономики
    88. 0
      19 March 2016 09: 26
      Meanwhile, the Russian Federation itself issues debt securities, and at a higher interest rate than American ones. The question is, is this another cunning plan or 2+2=5?
    89. 0
      19 March 2016 09: 43
      I want America to always be like this)))
    90. +1
      19 March 2016 11: 43
      I understood only one thing: for US funding to continue, there must be invincible corruption in the Russian Federation, and a corrupt official must be an ideological thief.
    91. +1
      19 March 2016 23: 33
      I liked Fritz Morgen's explanation better
    92. 0
      20 March 2016 00: 43
      In order to quickly boost the economy, the entire government must be dismissed and a new one appointed. where professionals should rule. not lawyers and furniture dealers. Reduce all officials by 70%. Stop the outflow of capital abroad by taxing it at 90%, pull all the money out of American bonds and invest the remaining money in the Russian economy. And put Kudrin, like Chubais and all Putin’s thieves on bunks, because they are enemies of the people. Under Stalin, Beria would have put them up against the wall long ago. And at the head of the economic block, put an expert council of leading economists to develop the right solution. And there is no need for us to look back to the USA and the West. We need to live by our own mind. But all this is a voice crying in the desert, for all our thieves keep their loot in Western banks. For them, Russia is a source of enrichment and in the event of force majeure, this entire public will immediately flee over the hill to their dough and real estate, and we will again be left with nothing. Do you think Putin doesn’t understand this? He understands, and how. It’s everyone around him who is feverishly stealing the budget. What if you have to run?
    93. 0
      20 March 2016 01: 50
      It's one thing to pull a small pebble out of a wall.
      It’s another matter if the wall really collapses
      This pebble is being enlarged...

      In general, I’m shocked how much liberalism started hanging out on topvar, I somehow missed the moment when it started... sad
      This is sad...
    94. 0
      20 March 2016 02: 06
      The Singapore option and style of development would be adequate to the economic situation created in the country.
    95. +1
      20 March 2016 02: 37
      Explained, gave a link - minus on you! That's not how you explain it! We must shout: hang the liberals, pour all the money into the economy! 100% of the screamers didn’t even open the article.
    96. hartlend
      0
      20 March 2016 21: 39
      Of those who hang out on this site, no one has reliable information on this issue, so everyone can write whatever they want. It will not be possible to check and catch a lie. However, Stalin invested money in the development of science and production, and not in the economies of other countries.
    97. 0
      21 March 2016 08: 23
      Dear forum users, maybe I’m wrong, but according to this article kprf.org/showthread.php?t=16335 it turns out that we cannot issue rubles until we purchase US Federal Reserve bonds. as much as we want to print money inside the country, we must buy dollars from the Fed. apparently during these months, when we bought dollars from the Federal Reserve, we issued rubles for the same amounts, respectively. on the same portal there was a similar article Ruble and dollar: How many rubles does a country have the right to “print”. Who (what) does this depend on, or haven’t you read something like this article? Our Bank of Russia, which prints rubles, is tied to the Federal Reserve, and without this it is impossible even to join the IMF if this does not happen. Everything is very complicated there with the Federal Reserve and the national currencies of almost the whole world. Do the deputies really not know where their legs come from?
    98. 0
      21 March 2016 08: 49
      Moscow’s investment of foreign currency into its native economy is more likely to lead to a new round of corruption than to the development of the domestic economy and industry. At least that's what some experts think

      Brilliant. A curtain.
    99. 0
      21 March 2016 16: 50
      I would advise my dear audience to pay attention to the statements of Mikhail Yuryev. As far as I can tell, his head is not stuffed with straw. And predictions somehow often come true. start with at least this article http://www.odnako.org/almanac/material/kak-bistro-viyti-iz-krizisa-1/
    100. 0
      22 March 2016 15: 57
      If China, Russia and other large investors in US Treasury bonds begin to withdraw them due to the threat of losing money, this could lead to the collapse of the entire US financial system.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"