"John C. Stennis" entered the South Korean port

101
The American aircraft carrier "John C. Stennis" entered the South Korean port of Pusan ​​to participate in joint maneuvers, reports RIA News message agency "Renhap".



According to the agency, “as part of the deck aviation the ship has about 80 pieces of equipment, including F / A-18 Hornet fighter-bombers, EA-6 Prowler and E-2 Hawkeye carrier-based aircraft. ”

It is noted that the large anti-submarine ships "Stockdale", "Chung-Hoon" and "William P. Lawrence", as well as the cruiser "Mobile Bay", will also take part in the exercise.

Large-scale US-Korean maneuvers began on March 7. They pass in several stages and will be completed at the end of April. More than 300 thous. Of military personnel are involved in them.

Help edition: "USS John C. Stennis (CVN-74) - American nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the seventh of a series of type" Nimitz ". Aircraft carrier home port - Kitsap base, Bremerton, Washington. Laid on March 13, 1991, launched on November 11, 1993, commissioned fleet December 9, 1995. The size of the team is 5617 people. ”
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

101 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +21
    13 March 2016 12: 40
    Oh, in vain they pull the devil's mustache! Sooner or later, the Chinese will get tired of making warnings! Yes, and the DPRK may be offended
    1. +3
      13 March 2016 12: 45
      They are afraid to approach Syria ...
      1. +4
        13 March 2016 13: 00
        Quote: MARK
        They are afraid to approach Syria ...



        As we got there, their aircraft carrier in full "sails" rushed away from there.
        1. +2
          13 March 2016 14: 02
          Never mind, India is planning to test the "Brahmos-M", with air tests at 550 and submarine-surface ones at 350 km. And the United States has the same REPovsky REP in the world, as many Afro-sailors dance green screens on their own radars. They can also knock off the course with their electronic warfare. Tokma - in its own direction.
          1. 0
            13 March 2016 17: 34
            They are afraid to approach Syria ...

            Where it is necessary to show your teeth, rotten ......
            1. +1
              13 March 2016 19: 32
              Quote: Bone
              Where it is necessary to show your teeth, rotten ......

              And the rotten inside also needs to be shown !!! And their teeth are really carious and rotten wassat !!! You +++++++++++ !!!!!!!!
              1. 0
                13 March 2016 20: 25
                Maybe the contents of the gut, they’re getting used to it.
                From the Black Sea like drapanuli.
          2. aba
            +1
            13 March 2016 17: 45
            Nothing, India's Brahmos-M tests are planned there

            Really shtatovtsev afraid ?!
            I’m not sure that Indians have enough problems with their neighbors without Americans.
          3. +1
            13 March 2016 17: 58
            Quote: Thronekeeper
            Never mind, India is planning to test the "Brahmos-M", with air tests at 550 and submarine-surface ones at 350 km. And the United States has the same REPovsky REP in the world, as many Afro-sailors dance green screens on their own radars. They can also knock off the course with their electronic warfare. Tokma - in its own direction.

            India vs America? You haven’t messed up anything? Just at the time when the United States turns away from Pakistan and turns to India? What kind of game drive.
            1. 0
              14 March 2016 18: 04
              Quote: MyVrach
              India vs America? You haven’t messed up anything? Just at the time when the United States turns away from Pakistan and turns to India? What kind of game drive.


              I agree, India is in no way an adversary of the United States - but not an unequivocal ally

              The great success of China and Russia that dragged India into the BRICS with Brazil - and used as a partner in creating a counterweight to the Western financial system.

              US will try to tear India from Russia and quarrel with China
        2. cap
          +7
          13 March 2016 14: 29
          Quote: cniza
          Quote: MARK
          They are afraid to approach Syria ...



          As we got there, their aircraft carrier in full "sails" rushed away from there.


          In Syria, they fooled and dumped. So rather. Now our attention is to the east.
          How to ... s in the garden, someone else's cabbage is poisoned.
          Fleet caught up with cod scare. China, these are not Indians with arrows, they can also embed. There is something good now.
          Who cares.
          http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/626404
          The Chinese admiral at the talks abruptly than American. Yes, and the alignment is excellent. Do not be ashamed to see.
          admiral
          1. 0
            13 March 2016 19: 35
            China can really answer they now have something to answer now! good
        3. +3
          13 March 2016 17: 11
          Their troughs are good with the partisans fighting. If the enemy has something more serious than the Kalash of the 47th year of release, then the heroes of America went to drift and dump away. They are heroes to fight with the wrong hands.
          1. +1
            13 March 2016 18: 31
            Quote: gergi
            If the enemy has something more serious than the Kalash of the 47th year of release, then the heroes of America went to drift and dump away.


            Not quite like that, my friend, not really like that. Saddam had weapons much more serious than Kalash 47 years. And where is Saddam now? Maybe the Americans bought his generals, maybe something like that, now it doesn’t matter. what matters is that the Iraqi army surrendered. and the president of Iraq was hanged like some sort of bandit from the highway.
            But Eunu, I think, does not threaten the fate of Hussein. Russia and China will not allow a war to be fought on its borders.
            1. +4
              13 March 2016 19: 46
              Kalash 47 is a figurative expression. Do you recall who fought in the coalition against the army of Hussein? Was the sky of Iraq covered by air defense systems? What was the Iraqi Air Force? Without air cover, any tank armada is doomed. Yes, even in the desert as flat as a table. In the jungles of Vietnam with the high-tech military assistance of the USSR, they became obnoxious. In Korea too. They will not trample against a high-tech enemy, the hypertrophied self-preservation instinct will screech and push against, they are exceptional, they need to live anyway, they will twist in loops, if they would not pinch their finger.
              1. +1
                13 March 2016 19: 59
                Quote: gergi
                Kalash 47 is a figurative expression.


                I guessed)))

                Quote: gergi
                Was the sky of Iraq covered by air defense systems?


                Do you think the sky of the UK is covered by air defense systems better than the sky of Iraq? I'm making fun of something.

                Quote: gergi
                What was the Iraqi Air Force?


                What are the Air Force SK? It seems to me that there is NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING!


                Quote: gergi
                Without air cover, any tank armada is doomed.



                Well, yes, at least Hussein had tanks, many tanks and T-72 as well. What does the UK have? Tanks like T-54, 55? very cool))) And how many of them can ride?


                Quote: gergi
                In the jungles of Vietnam with the high-tech military assistance of the USSR, they became obnoxious.



                My friend, this was another war, often face to face. In Serbia, they didn’t even bring in troops, they just drove them to the point of bombing and that's it!


                Anyway, why are you so excited? Take it easy. In the Far East direction of the war is not expected.

                And one more thing. On the US side there are resources and attendants, many attendants, who often solve much more than thousands of shooting and flying wunderwaffles. The environment of Saddam succumbed to the temptation to get a lot of green papers. And suddenly, in which case, the inner circle of Una will sell his cartridge. Or do you not allow this option in principle?
                1. 0
                  13 March 2016 22: 23
                  I would like to know what kind of a parasite threw a minus and what arguments he will bring for this. Come on, make excuses.
        4. 0
          13 March 2016 19: 30
          Quote: cniza
          Quote: MARK
          They are afraid to approach Syria ...

          Quote: cniza
          As we got there, their aircraft carrier in full "sails" rushed away from there.

          You pluses! Speak correctly! Messieurs the almighty of the world wassat !!! And now they found a weak spot (North Korea) and decided to show their steepness there !!! So if Kim asks (suddenly wink ) our Vladimir Vladimirovich for help lol ??! They are from there feet in hand and a matter of technology gee-gee-gee !!! But in general, seriously, the partners of the meshes try everywhere wherever there is at least a small opportunity to rock the situation to a conflict! No. not to see !!! In a word, they are VICTIMS !!! abortion feel
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +6
        13 March 2016 13: 07
        Interestingly, when this amerskaya stubborn arrogance will bother someone, and such a miracle of Yankes's trough building gurgling will go to the bottom? Moreover, under mysterious circumstances, without an obvious attack. Sooner or later technology will be made, such as underwater UFOs or mysterious "Quakers", but the yankee will croak and it will be calmer on Mother Earth! hi
        1. 0
          13 March 2016 13: 28
          , and such a miracle of the Yankees trough construction gurgling will go to the bottom?
          We would have such a "trough" and better not one
          1. +14
            13 March 2016 13: 33
            Quote: Monge
            We would have such a "trough" and better not one


            So such troughs still need to be fed. Is it a purely American flag to scare? So the Papuans are already ending, and in our area of ​​responsibility and under the waterline you can get it, or just on the deck ... if you really lose the exceptional scent. For me, this submarine is much more effective. Arrives - so ARRIVES.
            1. +3
              13 March 2016 13: 48
              Ilyich! 13.33. You offer to take a dry cargo ship, put PU on it and send it to where you need it? Nice thought.
              1. 0
                13 March 2016 14: 32
                Quote: Region 34
                Ilyich! 13.33. You offer to take a dry cargo ship, put PU on it and send it to where you need it? Nice thought.


                Why should a dry cargo ship be driven with PU? Well it’s forbidden, like, and expensive. At sea, and so all sorts of ACCIDENTS happen all the time.
            2. +1
              13 March 2016 14: 38
              So such troughs still need to be fed. Is it a purely American flag to scare? So the Papuans are already ending
              So you are against aircraft carriers in general or against their presence in the Navy? It’s ridiculous. However, from the point of view of saving finances, Kudrin would agree with you.
              1. +11
                13 March 2016 14: 57
                Quote: Monge
                So you are against aircraft carriers in general or against their presence in the Navy? It’s ridiculous. However, from the point of view of saving finances, Kudrin would agree with you.


                I am against aircraft carriers as part of our Navy, let the kids from the Pintagon amuse themselves, they have everything the MOST big and thickest, except, um, well, it's clear what. An aircraft carrier is a floating target, there are very effective means of destruction, so why there are 5 billion. green blotters at least merge on each trough, if a whole squadron is attached to it, so that they would not drown the first rocket? Big, you say, won't work with one? Yes, even one is enough for the deck, and not a single pepelats will take off. I repeat - submarines are much more efficient, and aircraft carriers are only of interest to admirals in the sense of "cutting". This is a means of attack, but certainly not retaliation, and we would have to keep our territory.
            3. +1
              13 March 2016 22: 50
              So the USA has half the trough for cancellation, the pancake came to their senses, that’s what remains of the last forces to rattle with weapons.
              1. 0
                14 March 2016 05: 13
                Quote: Wolverine
                So the USA has half the trough for cancellation, the pancake came to their senses, that’s what remains of the last forces to rattle with weapons.


                Here they will make a NEEDLE for a write-off. How much is it possible to roll back? Come on, guys, we just rub our hands. We are your corruption, or "lobbying" in the congressman way - what a balm for the soul. Let's hit the road .
        2. +13
          13 March 2016 13: 36
          Major Yurik! 13.07/XNUMX. tongue Interesting too. How buoyancy does this trough have? But for sure, the engineers calculated everything there. Although the Titanic was considered unsinkable, and the German cruisers. Another question is of interest. What if China or Russia conduct their exercises off the coast of the United States? With a small number of over 300-400 thousand soldiers. For example, with the legend of protecting Cuba from terrorists. What will Washington say about this? Will be very happy? It is a pity we do not conduct exercises near their shores. recourse And if you conduct the Russia-Mexico exercises?
          1. +7
            13 March 2016 14: 03
            [quote] Also interesting. How buoyancy does this trough have? But for sure the engineers calculated everything there. [Quote]

            Ah, dear 34th, I think in an old-fashioned way about calmness, and not about fierce hatred of the Yankees ANG. Let the feathers open, they can’t see without it. And about the buoyancy of these air basins, there are many of our submariners floating up inside their guard rings, and evil tongues broadcast that they also asked the Yankees for time! hi
            1. +1
              13 March 2016 19: 32
              Quote: Major Yurik
              and evil tongues broadcast that they also asked the Yankees for time!

              Yes, and the flights made unexpected, and more than once!
          2. +3
            13 March 2016 14: 05
            The islands of Ratmanov and Kruzenshtern are 4.2 km away. You need to light up there.
            1. +1
              13 March 2016 19: 46
              Quote: GYGOLA
              The islands of Ratmanov and Kruzenshtern are 4.2 km away. You need to light up there.

              Here good !!! Another great idea Yes !!! From me ++++++++++++++++++ !!!!!!!!!!!! It’ll turn out really cool !!!
          3. +2
            13 March 2016 19: 30
            Quote: Region 34
            And if you conduct the Russia-Mexico exercises?

            Why not Nicaragua? There, and put the base to maintain democracy on the American continent!
          4. +2
            13 March 2016 19: 43
            Quote: Region 34
            And if you conduct the Russia-Mexico exercises?

            What !!! Very cool good good goodidea !!! It’s necessary to promote it to the top somehow what ... No, I'm quite serious !!! It is necessary to promote this idea to the top; let them remember there, it will consider all the pros and cons and can put it into practice !!! To you from me +++++++++++ !!!!
          5. +3
            13 March 2016 20: 07
            Can you imagine how much fuel and explosive is on it? One rocket can turn it into a gigantic crematorium. And if there are not even two missiles? And there are such missiles, guess who? Therefore, where there are these missiles there are no these giant iron kaputov and will not be.
            1. 0
              13 March 2016 23: 03
              Quote: gergi
              And if there are not even two missiles?


              And so they will fly in a kind of doublet X-102-e, the nightmare of a cheburashyakchumazy-demobil. And what, Hillary with the oligarch trump? Are you SURE in the Pentagon? Well this is America’s nightmare, well, no kidding. This is still without submarine warning ... Where you put your horror? Not otherwise, the Communists will win the next election. Well, people, do not bring to the sapper shovel in the skull ... After all, let’s apply. And then the McCains from the windows will start to pair with the McNamars - Communists, e, under the window, there is NO choice! wassat
      4. +2
        13 March 2016 16: 53
        Quote: MARK
        They are afraid to approach Syria ...

        Aircraft carriers of the far sea zone. They don’t have to come close to anything. Everything for them is done by their aviation and escort team.
        1. +1
          13 March 2016 19: 34
          Quote: Jerusalem artichoke
          . Everything for them is done by their aviation and escort team.

          And they will bury!
    2. 0
      13 March 2016 12: 46
      And the North Korean submarines with nuclear weapons on board the other day went to sea. Fucking coincidence.
      1. +3
        13 March 2016 12: 50
        one boat already lost
        1. +1
          13 March 2016 12: 56
          To the port of Busan Northern and without submarines will be added.
          1. +3
            13 March 2016 13: 01
            Oh, how I want it to fly to the take-off of a thread vertically falling on supersonic ...
            1. +3
              13 March 2016 14: 44
              A meteorite of the Chelyabinsk type, for example.
              Suddenly shymyak on the deck.
              1. 0
                13 March 2016 15: 18
                Quote: Temples
                A meteorite of the Chelyabinsk type, for example.
                Suddenly shymyak on the deck.


                So where do those meteorites go now - the harsh Chelyabinsk men knocked one down, now they don’t bother wassat . Let other places now look for those meteorites.
        2. +2
          13 March 2016 13: 03
          Who confirmed this loss?
          1. -2
            13 March 2016 13: 19
            and who refuted?
            1. +2
              13 March 2016 13: 25
              do they have yao on board?
              1. +2
                13 March 2016 15: 33
                We do not know at all how much and what the DPRK is armed with.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +8
        13 March 2016 13: 26
        Quote: DMB_95
        And the North Korean submarines with nuclear weapons on board the other day went to sea

        DPRK has a submarine with nuclear weapons on board ??? Did not know! Can I link?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. -2
          13 March 2016 18: 33
          The other day, on the news on 1 (or 2) TV channel, I saw a story about the successful launch of the latest missile from the DPRK submarine on the high seas. New submarine, new missile under a nuclear warhead. I’m not yet insane to write such a thing.
    3. +3
      13 March 2016 13: 24
      Quote: Berserks
      Oh, in vain they pull the devil's mustache! Sooner or later, the Chinese will get tired of making warnings! Yes, and the DPRK may be offended

      Yes, there will be nothing, DPRK has been threatening for years only, yapping and all, the Chinese also do not need problems
      1. +5
        13 March 2016 13: 44
        Quote: Army1
        Yes, there will be nothing, DPRK has been threatening for years only, yapping and all, the Chinese also do not need problems

        not so long ago, about 6 years ago, in my opinion, the DPRK submariners sent to the bottom a South Korean corvette, and quite modern, none of the more than 100 crew members survived from the crew
        1. 0
          13 March 2016 15: 55
          I think losing a boat is revenge for a sunken corvette. Some quietly torpedoed the corvette, others silently drowned the boat. All honestly. I think that this is the work of the American submarine from the guard of an aircraft carrier. No wonder the Americans were the first to report the loss of the boat.
        2. 0
          14 March 2016 09: 57
          South Korean Navy Corvette PCC-772 "Cheonan" sank on March 26, 2010 near the Pennyendo Island in the Yellow Sea. Of the 104 crew members, 46 were killed.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +1
      13 March 2016 18: 57
      Oh, in vain they pull the devil's mustache! Sooner or later, the Chinese will get tired of making warnings! Yes, and the DPRK may be offended
      Well, as they did not respect Eun, he so begged.
    6. 0
      13 March 2016 19: 15
      Quote: Berserks
      Oh, in vain they pull the devil's mustache! Sooner or later, the Chinese will get tired of making warnings! Yes, and the DPRK may be offended

      The boat is cool, no words. And what about volcanoes, tsunamis, reefs, drifting mines ...?
    7. +2
      13 March 2016 19: 33
      Quote: Berserks
      Sooner or later, the Chinese will get tired of making warnings!

      (cry) hi
  2. +9
    13 March 2016 12: 41
    The American aircraft carrier "John C. Stennis" entered the South Korean port of Pusan ​​to participate in joint maneuvers, the RNHap news agency reported to RIA Novosti.


    And China has begun the legal legalization of disputed territories. wink
    1. 0
      13 March 2016 19: 49
      Quote: cniza
      China has begun legalization of disputed territories.

      Right and did !!! good !
  3. +2
    13 March 2016 12: 44
    I’m licking my lips right at the thought of an exacerbation of friendship between China and the mattress, and I’m probably sorry for those who go hungry in the ranks, inspired by Juche
    1. +2
      13 March 2016 12: 47
      Quote: vanavate
      I’m licking my lips right at the thought of an exacerbation of friendship between China and the mattress, and I’m probably sorry for those who go hungry in the ranks, inspired by Juche

      In vain do you jerk ...
      1. -1
        13 March 2016 12: 53
        why, not in vain laughing
  4. +5
    13 March 2016 12: 47
    Now Eun Podi will again begin some kind of exercise, or a dozen rockets will be launched somewhere, to patrol the United States and South Koreans.
  5. +8
    13 March 2016 12: 47
    The days when it was possible to frighten China with an aircraft carrier have passed, and it’s impossible to take North Koreans at all. So all their demonstrations down the drain.
  6. +15
    13 March 2016 12: 53
    Laid on March 13, 1991, launched on November 11, 1993, entered the fleet on December 9, 1995. Well, in less than 4 years, an atomic aircraft carrier has been sculpted, no matter what you say, but cool, although they’re byaky of course in life, that's for sure.
  7. 0
    13 March 2016 12: 57
    Quote: FenH
    one boat already lost

    who knows, even they are not particularly upset. bully
    1. +2
      13 March 2016 13: 06
      I don’t know, I didn’t drink tea with Eun hi
  8. +1
    13 March 2016 13: 01
    Quote: cniza
    The American aircraft carrier "John C. Stennis" entered the South Korean port of Pusan ​​to participate in joint maneuvers, the RNHap news agency reported to RIA Novosti.


    And China has begun the legal legalization of disputed territories. wink

    Well, right, the dog barks, the caravan goes on.
  9. +2
    13 March 2016 13: 16
    Yes, we clearly do not need problems in the east.
    1. 0
      13 March 2016 19: 52
      Quote: polite people
      Yes, we clearly do not need problems in the east.

      We don’t need any problems anywhere!
  10. +4
    13 March 2016 13: 22
    well, let’s go to hell with them, you won’t forbid it, the main thing is that Our powder would be dry, but the gun is oiled smile
    not the topic - all members of the forum with Shrovetide, and I'm sorry who minus hi
  11. -3
    13 March 2016 13: 34
    Interestingly, the DPRK has combat swimmers? And then these Markovists are all threatening to detonate the atomic bomb, some missiles are launched themselves do not know where. They would send a couple of their lads to this South Korean bay and bam, there is no more of this eminent aircraft carrier.
    I mean that while the leader of North Korea is pouring water on the mill of the Americans and their hangers-on, and the united slaves of all countries. Apparently, training in a Swiss college was not in vain. Most likely, soon we will see provocations on our border by the North Koreans. And they will put forward territorial demands, and they will ask for money for the "occupation". Everything goes on a knurled one.
    1. +2
      13 March 2016 13: 59
      please don't touch comrade Eun laughing
    2. +1
      13 March 2016 16: 43
      The DPRK, even in drunken fantasies, will never trample on Russia. It is our faithful ally, although they try not to advertise it, so as not to tease the geese.
      1. +1
        13 March 2016 19: 59
        Yes, North Korea has always been our ally! And they very much respect our country! And the fact that we express to them the supposedly protest note that they conduct nuclear weapons tests there is by quiet agreement wink between the leaders of our and DPRK countries! So DPRK for this is not a claim to RUSSIA !!!
  12. +1
    13 March 2016 14: 18
    Another “peacemaker." Why tease a hungry Korean movie-log. Let the svora lower, and who will drive whom and with whose help is unknown.
  13. +2
    13 March 2016 14: 26
    Did the boat disappear? Moreman, maybe the North Korean submarine will go quiet in some sort of kadratika in an ambush? Perhaps this is technically?
    1. +2
      13 March 2016 15: 00
      Quote: Captive
      Moreman, maybe the North Korean submarine will go quiet in some sort of kadratika in an ambush? Perhaps this is technically?

      Maybe! Until they raise! wink
    2. 0
      13 March 2016 20: 00
      Quote: Captive
      Perhaps this is technically?

      Quite possible! But such an ambush (duration) depends on the technical capabilities of the submarine itself!
  14. +2
    13 March 2016 14: 28
    The size of the team is 5617 people. ”
    Not a bad mass grave will turn out, if that! lol
    1. 0
      13 March 2016 20: 02
      Quote: afrikanez
      Not a bad mass grave will turn out, if that!

      ++++++++ !!!!!!! laughing good !!!
  15. +3
    13 March 2016 14: 31
    Was in the Russian Navy such a class of ships-mine-loader ... I’ll tell you very much, a useful thing against strike groups .. I think SevKoru would be very useful ...
  16. DPN
    +1
    13 March 2016 15: 11
    Let's hope somewhere in the distance our boat carries patrol service.
    1. 0
      13 March 2016 16: 38
      Quote: DPN
      Let's hope somewhere in the distance our boat carries patrol service.

      And what will it give us?
    2. +1
      13 March 2016 16: 45
      Everything is going according to plan — North Korea is distracting — We are finalizing questions on Syria.
      1. +1
        13 March 2016 20: 04
        Hush you !!! Not No. give out military secret then !!! How can you not ay-ay-ay !!! belay
  17. +8
    13 March 2016 16: 15
    What a hurray-patriotic branch turns out. We'll throw our hats ... AUG is a powerful thing, it's not for nothing that in the USSR a whole regiment of "bears" was allocated for the attack. For one "trough", as they decided for some reason.
    Underestimating the enemy is dangerous and only the enemy is at hand.
    1. +5
      13 March 2016 16: 41
      Quote: certero
      What a jingoistic branch it turns out. We will throw our hats ...

      The most powerful weapon! soldier
    2. +3
      13 March 2016 17: 48
      Quote: certero
      What a hurray-patriotic branch turns out. We'll throw our hats ... AUG is a powerful thing, it's not for nothing that in the USSR a whole regiment of "bears" was allocated for the attack. For one "trough", as they decided for some reason.
      Underestimating the enemy is dangerous and only the enemy is at hand.

      And here the majority is sure that Kim will drown an American aircraft carrier with the ideas of Juche and a nuclear missile and tear the United States laughing
      1. +1
        13 March 2016 19: 45
        It was not in vain that a whole regiment of "bears" was allocated for the attack in the USSR. For one "trough", as here for some reason they decided.
        -------------------------
        As far as I remember, the Tu-22 regiment. A regiment of bears is cool: =) Moreover, given their total number.
    3. 0
      13 March 2016 18: 07
      AUG is the most powerful thing, it was not for nothing that a whole regiment of "bears" was allocated for the attack in the USSR
      Bears seem to have a different task. For this, the regiment (backfire - "Reverse Fire") was imprisoned ... or am I confusing something? Enlighten the Lord.
  18. +4
    13 March 2016 17: 08
    Well, we will not throw hats, of course ... but I hope on the "Texas" in Busan (if it is still functioning) our sailors-fishermen are heaping mattresses on their faces)) As it happened more than once before)) In 1998, he himself witnessed how our heads carried it out)))))) And then the local police chased any Russian sailor in order to punish drinks
  19. +2
    13 March 2016 17: 12
    Did the boat disappear? Moreman, maybe the North Korean submarine will go quiet in some sort of kadratika in an ambush? Perhaps this is technically?

    Everything is possible. Only most likely the boat has already died .. Unfortunately, miracles do not happen. And such tragedies happen not only among the North Koreans .. The tragedy with "Kursk" has already been forgotten ..? The submariner's profession has always been and remains on the verge of life and death in all countries.
  20. +1
    13 March 2016 17: 25
    Yeah ... in 2 years the aircraft carrier was built, Ivan Gren will soon exchange the second ten years for construction
  21. +1
    13 March 2016 17: 52
    Actually, the Chinese promised to launch a preventive nuclear strike at the beginning of the exercises.

    Firstly, not the Chinese, but the Koreans. Secondly, for some reason, in all the media, the following phrase is omitted ".. in case of detection of intentions of aggression .." directly warn that you do not need to provoke them if you do not want war.
  22. 0
    13 March 2016 17: 53
    Come in, come in, what's the difference, Why? That is the question! Abamki is far away, and we are in the zone of responsibility. By and large, it must be squeezed. IF enters the zone of our interests. In general, he does not belong there - a provocation !!!
  23. -2
    13 March 2016 18: 02
    They all climb and climb, filthy cockroaches! It doesn’t sit in the port of registration, so when one iron makes an oprakidont, then the ardor of the "minke whales" may subside. We must help the North Korean comrades!
  24. -1
    13 March 2016 18: 05
    They probably drove the aircraft carrier so that China would let it up or make a museum. Ours sold, now the Americans are on our way. Only abruptly with airplanes.
    1. -1
      13 March 2016 18: 37
      Three kiloton dash torpedoes is enough to sink this aircraft carrier and destroy part of the port. Surely, the DPRK Navy is already armed with nuclear torpedoes.
  25. -1
    13 March 2016 18: 49
    Three kiloton torpedoes is enough to sink this aircraft carrier and destroy part of the port

    It is unlikely .. Somewhere infa came across that the American nuclear-powered aircraft carriers are designed to stay afloat after the explosion of an atomic warhead of 50 kilotons at a distance of several hundred meters from the ship .. So if it’s not directly into the ship it’s unlikely whether drown ..
    Surely, the DPRK Navy is already armed with nuclear torpedoes.

    No, no. At least for now.
  26. 0
    13 March 2016 18: 58
    Quote: Thronekeeper
    Nothing,. And the United States has the same REPovskovsky REP in the world, as many afromoryaks green screens dance on their own radars.


    He said beautifully. Right in their all-seeing eye(oh, one). Thank you, I understand, laughing ...
  27. +1
    13 March 2016 19: 16
    your division, 4 years from scratch before the surrender of such a mammoth ... I envy
  28. 0
    13 March 2016 19: 50
    the North Koreans are good fellows, and the South Koreans under the USA have bent over compound feed, the bastards are shameful, will make you pederasts and rejoice then, and you will make lesbians and pederasts of your children, and you all are chun da chun hun hun, then go look for your wife and daughter in amer’s holds, capitalized, tfu pederasts on you
  29. DPN
    +1
    13 March 2016 22: 06
    Quote: Bayonet
    And what will it give us?

    Destroy the enemy.
  30. -1
    14 March 2016 02: 19
    In the United States, such a number of cruise missiles simply can’t withstand any stupidly run out of missiles to shoot down.
  31. 0
    14 March 2016 05: 03
    your division, 4 years from scratch before the surrender of such a mammoth ... I envy

    Especially when you consider that this "mammoth" is 330 meters long, 70 meters wide and has a displacement of 100 tons.
  32. 0
    14 March 2016 08: 05
    it will not be surprising if this miracle of American shipbuilding accidentally crashes during the so-called exercises and gets out to the nearest base in Japan to lick the wounds ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"