Soviet anti-tank grenade launchers. Part 2

56
Soviet anti-tank grenade launchers. Part 2


By the beginning of the 70-ies of the XX century in the arsenal of the Soviet infantry consisted of very effective samples of reusable hand and machine-gun anti-tank grenade launchers. Each motorized infantry unit had a grenade launcher armed with an RPG-2 or RPG-7, the battalion’s anti-tank defense was provided by the LNG-9 and the portable “Malyutka” ATGM.

However, individual anti-tank individual motorized infantry still, as in the war years, remained anti-tank grenades RKG-3. This manually fired ammunition was designed to destroy armored vehicles using a shaped charge.


GSC-3


A well-trained fighter could throw an RCG-3 weighing more than 1 kg over a distance of 15-20 meters. Stabilization of the RKG-3 in flight with the head part forward was carried out by a special parachute of the characteristic elongated shape. This anti-tank grenade, which, depending on the modification, had 170-220 mm armor penetration, was a great danger for the grenade launcher itself, and according to the instructions, it could only be used from shelter. It is clear that in real combat, the soldiers thought less about everything about the personal security during the destruction of the enemy armored vehicles that had broken through, and the use of powerful hand-held anti-tank grenades inevitably led to heavy casualties among the personnel.

In the 1967 year, the Basalt and the TsKIB SOO for the replacement of the manual cumulative grenades RKG-3 began the development of the RPU-18 disposable rocket grenades “Fly”, in 1972 it was put into service. Many researchers are inclined to believe that the creation of the RPG-18 was launched after samples of the American M72 LAW disposable grenade launcher captured in Vietnam were brought to the Soviet Union. It is hard to say whether this was really so, but in the layout and a number of constructive decisions, Mukha had a lot in common with the American grenade launcher.


RPG-18 "Fly"


The reader may wonder why M72 LAW is considered a grenade launcher in the American army, and in our RPG-18 is considered to be a grenade? In fact, the difference between these very similar in their capabilities and structurally similar samples is only in the name. In the Soviet Army, a disposable RPG-18 was not assigned to armament, but to off-nominal ammunition in order to facilitate the process of counting and decommissioning, since it was much easier to write off an anti-tank grenade used or lost during combat operations or exercises.

The launch of the RPG-18 jet grenade with a cumulative warhead of 64 mm caliber takes place in the barrel of a disposable trigger device. Until the moment of the departure of the grenade from the barrel, a full combustion of the starting powder charge takes place. Unlike PG-7 and PG-9, the cumulative RPG-18 grenade after ejecting from the barrel with an initial speed of 115 m / s, then flies only by inertia, without acceleration by a sustained jet engine. This circumstance predetermined a relatively short range of shooting - 150 meters. That, however, is 8-10 times the possible throw range of a hand-made cumulative Grenade GKG-3. In terms of armor penetration - 300 mm normal homogeneous armor, the RPG-18 also surpassed the GSC-3. With a mass of 2,6 kg, a disposable reactive “Fly” is about twice as heavy as the RCG-3, with a much higher efficiency. The length of the RPG-18 in the cocked combat position is - 1050 mm, in the marching position - 705 mm.

The undermining of the cumulative charge of the “okfol” explosive (plasticized octogen) with a mass of 312 g, when hit the target, is produced by an instantaneous piezoelectric fuse. In case of a miss or failure of the main fuse, the grenade is equipped with a self-killer. In order to increase the accuracy of fire, the anti-tank grenade in flight rotates at a speed of several tens of revolutions per second. The grenade is stabilized on the trajectory with the help of four blades that open up after departure from the barrel.

RPG-18 has very good accuracy indicators. At a distance of 150 meters, the average deviations do not exceed 0,7 meters, which allows a sufficiently high probability of hitting. However, good results, as a rule, are demonstrated by grenade throwers who have real shooting experience and are able to correctly determine the distance and choose the lead in case of damage to the moving tank.

The starting device RPG-18 is a telescopic design of smooth-walled outer and inner tubes. On the outer tube printed detailed instructions for use "Flies". The outer tube was made of fiberglass, it protects the grenade thrower from the effects of jet engine exhaust during the launch of a grenade. The inner tube from which the rocket grenade is launched is made of a high-strength aluminum alloy. On the back upper part of the inner tube, there is a firing mechanism with a locking device and a primer-igniter grenade assembled in one case.

To bring the RPG-18 into a combat position, it is necessary to remove the safety lock and move the launch canister apart. End caps recline automatically when casting, the safety strut with a diopter sight, and the front sight move into a vertical position. After determining the distance, selecting the appropriate aiming mark and aiming by pressing the trigger lever, a grenade is launched. After bringing into combat the return of the RPG-18 back to the marching is impossible. Not used for the intended purpose, the cocked jet grenades must be fired towards the enemy or blown up at a safe distance.

As with the shooting of other anti-tank grenade launchers, when you start the RPG-18 behind the shooter, a dangerous zone is formed, in which there should be no other military personnel, obstacles and flammable objects. A powerful jet stream of a shot can lead to the formation of a dust or snow cloud, which unmasks the shooter.

Production of RPG-18 was carried out until 1993, and the disposable jet Fly was actively used during conflicts in the post-Soviet space. A total of 21 million RPG-1,5 was produced in 18 year. This ammunition has become a common name for all disposable anti-tank and anti-tank grenades. Currently, despite the fact that the "Fly" is considered obsolete, it continues to be in service with the Russian army. This is largely due to significant accumulated reserves.

Although the RPG-18 armor penetration indicators are no longer enough to destroy modern tanks in frontal projection, this rocket grenade can be successfully used to destroy lightly armored vehicles, manpower and enemy firing points.

In the 1980, the RPG-22 “Netto” anti-tank grenade of the 73 caliber mm was put into service. It was created as a further development option for the RPG-18. An increase in the caliber of a new anti-tank grenade made it possible to increase the mass of the shaped charge explosive to 340 g. That, in turn, led to an increase in armor penetration to 400 mm.

Thanks to the use of a new powder formulation with an increased burning rate, the engine running time was reduced, which made the barrel shorter and at the same time increase the initial speed of the grenade to 133 m / s. In this case, the direct shot range increased to 160 meters, and the aimed range of fire is 250 meters. As a result of changes made to the trigger mechanism, it became possible to re-cocked in the event of a misfire. The length in the combat position of the RPG-22 decreased to mm 850, which made the treatment more convenient. Compared to the RPG-18, the mass of the RPG-22 has increased by just 100.


RPG-22 "Net"


On the outer plastic pipe RPG-22 also has detailed instructions for use. This, of course, does not mean that practical skills are not needed for the effective use of this munition.



Bringing the RPG-22 from the combat position back to the marching position is not allowed. As in the case of the RPG-18, unencumbered grenades, brought into action, must be fired towards the enemy or in a safe direction.

Production of RPG-22 "Net" in Russia lasted until the year 1993. In the past, RPG-22 was offered for export by Bulgaria, this country received a license to manufacture RPG-22 in the middle of 80's. In Bulgaria, rocket-propelled grenades were manufactured at the Arsenal enterprise in the city of Kazanlak.

According to the testimony of the military personnel who participated in the hostilities, the RPG-22 "Netto" is a very reliable and effective ammunition. However, she inherited some of the shortcomings of the RPG-18. During local conflicts, the RPG-22 demonstrated that it is capable of striking modern tanks only on board. From the experience of the “first Chechen one”, it turned out that for the destruction of T-72 and T-80, equipped with dynamic protection blocks, it was necessary to get 10 hits from RPG-18 and RPG-22. Much better data jet grenades proved themselves during the storming of buildings. The cumulative RPG-22 warhead was quite capable of breaking through a half-meter-high reinforced concrete wall.

In 1985, the Agleni RPG-26 entered service. As well as other, earlier models of disposable rocket grenades, it was developed at NPO Basalt. The main goal in creating the RPG-26 was to facilitate the transfer of the grenade to the combat position, adding the ability to transfer back from the combat position to the traveling one, reducing the size of the combat position, as well as improving the effectiveness of hitting targets.


RPG-26 "Aglena"


The caliber of the RPG-26 remained the same as in the RPG-22 - 73 mm. But thanks to the use of a more advanced jet engine, the initial speed of the grenade increased to 145 m / s, and, accordingly, the direct shot range increased to 170 meters. Improving the design of the cumulative charge allowed to bring armor penetration - up to 440 mm. And most importantly, the time for the transfer of a rocket grenade from a marching to a combat position was halved. At the same time, the mass of RPG-26 as compared to RPG-22 increased only by 200 gr. The length of the RPG-26 in the combat position is - 770 mm.

The design of the RPG-26 has become much simpler, the launching device is a monoblock fiberglass pipe. From the ends, the pipe is closed with rubber caps, which are destroyed when fired. To bring the RPG-26 into a combat position, a safety check is retrieved. When casting sights in the combat position, the trigger mechanism is cocked, and a shot can be fired by pressing the trigger. If it is necessary to transfer the grenade back from the combat to the marching position, when lowering the sight sight in the horizontal position and fixing it with a check, the trigger mechanism is removed from the combat platoon.

At present, the Agleni RPG-26 is in service with the motorized rifle and airborne units of the Russian army. Being quite inexpensive and at the same time reliable and effective ammunition, this rocket grenade ensures the defeat of modern battle tanks in the side. With it, you can also destroy manpower and light field fortifications of the enemy.

Further development of the RPG-26 "Aglena" was the anti-tank grenade RPG-27 "Tavolga". It was developed by the NGO Basalt and entered service in 1989 year. The main goal in creating the RPG-27 was to ensure the defeat of modern tanks covered with dynamic armor from any direction.


RPG-27 "Tavolga"


Structurally, the RPG-27 repeats the RPG-26 with a trigger device, sighting devices and a trigger mechanism. The main difference is the use of a tandem warhead in the new rocket grenade, unified with the warhead grenade PG-7BP for the reusable RPG-7 rocket launcher. This grenade is able to penetrate 600-mm armor, covered with dynamic protection. The initial departure speed of the RPG-27 grenades from the launch tube is about 120 m / s.

The RPG-27 caliber has grown to 105 mm, while the weight has increased almost three times compared to the RPG-26 and is 8,3 kg. The length compared to the RPG-26 has become longer by 365 mm. A direct shot range decreased by 30 meters. The increased weight and size is an inevitable price for the multiply increased efficiency of Tavolga. Not so long ago it became known about the development of an upgraded version of the RPG-26 with improved ergonomic parameters and a removable telescopic sight.

In addition to fighting modern armored vehicles, the RPG-27 can be effectively used to destroy enemy manpower in buildings and structures made of reinforced concrete, bricks and in field wooden ground shelters.

But the Vampire RPG-29 became the most breakthrough anti-tank grenade launcher, created in the NPO Bazalt shortly before the collapse of the USSR. This grenade launcher complex consisting of tandem cumulative and thermobaric shots was intended to combat all types of existing and prospective tanks, as well as to destroy enemy manpower and destroy defenses of various types.


RPG-29 "Vampire"


RPG-29 "Vampire" was officially adopted by the Soviet Army in the year 1989. But at that time, the military considered that the existing anti-tank weapons were sufficient, and the mass production of RPG-29 was not established. In addition, for the infantry units, the new-generation grenade launcher was considered too heavy and expensive. The weight of the charged RPG-29 with a sight and a folding bipod is 18,8 kg. With such a mass, its transportation over long distances by one soldier is difficult. The RPG-7 mass with a PG-7BP grenade is approximately two times smaller. It was not taken into account that the range of the RPG-29 direct shot reaches 500 meters, which is twice the shooting range of the PG-7BR tandem grenade from the RPG-7.


PG-29B shot (above) is unified on the warhead with PG-7BP (below)


When creating a new grenade launcher used the best design solutions, previously implemented in other types of Soviet anti-tank grenade launchers. So from the RPG-7 grenade launcher RPG-29 inherited a tandem warhead grenade PG-7BP. The front combat part of the PG-29В grenade is designed to overcome a dynamic protection unit or a protective screen, after which the more powerful rear warhead directly hits the main armor of the tank. Penetration after overcoming dynamic protection is 600-650 mm.

From the landing RPG-16 borrowed caliber smooth barrel, made detachable for ease of transportation, as well as an electric trigger mechanism with engine ignition grenades electrically. In the middle of the grenade launcher is a trigger with a fire control knob. On the upper part of the trunk are duplicating mechanical sights - rear sight and front sight.



When disassembling the RPG-29 into two parts, the trigger mechanism and the sight remain on the “front” half of the grenade launcher. The grenade launcher in the stowed position is— 1 meter, in combat - 1,85 meter. The calculation of the RPG-29 consists of two people. For carrying a grenade launcher and ammunition are two knapsacks. In one of them is placed a grenade launcher, in the other - 3 rocket launchers.



Unlike other domestic grenade launchers, the PG-29В grenade used in the RPG-29 is a purely reactive, propelling charge in the composition of the shot is absent. The burning time of the powder in a jet engine is designed so that it is completed before the PG-29В grenades exit the barrel. The grenade accelerates along a sufficiently long barrel to 255 m / s and stabilizes in flight with eight folding blades. This scheme allows to reduce the impact of the shot products on the grenade launcher, to simplify the design of the grenade launcher and ammunition, as well as to facilitate aiming, since in flight the PG-29В grenade does not have an active part of the jet engine.


Mock Shot TBG-29B


The shot included in the RPG-29 ammunition with the TBG-29V thermobaric grenade is comparable in effectiveness with the 122-mm artillery projectile. The solid radius of destruction of TBG-29В is 10 meters, and the armor penetration when firing at lightly armored vehicles is up to 20 mm. However, the shot on the modern tank thermobaric ammunition is unlikely to pass for the combat vehicle without a trace. In case of a frontal projection, it is very likely that the sights, observation devices and tank armament will be damaged.

A well-prepared calculation can do up to 4 sighting shots per minute. The considerable mass and dimensions of the RPG-29 make it justified to use it from the machine, this greatly simplifies the conditions of the calculation and increases the accuracy of shooting.


Option RPG-29 grenade launcher with a machine and optical-electronic sight


The 1P38 telescopic sight with 2,7 magnification is used as a standard sighting device. The RPG-29 hand-held anti-tank grenade launcher can be completed with the 1PN51-2 night-sight. Approximately 10 years ago as part of the modernization of the Vampire grenade launcher, a combined optical-electronic sight 2Ц35 was developed for it.



This device is mounted instead of a standard sight on an RPG-29 grenade launcher mounted on a machine and due to the presence of a laser rangefinder, it can measure the distance to the target day and night with high accuracy and calculate the necessary corrections when shooting at a distance of 1000 meters.



Despite the high combat effectiveness against Israeli Merkava tanks during the Second Lebanon War in 2006, the number of anti-tank RPG-29 “Vampire” grenade launchers in the Russian army is currently minimal. Apparently, most of the produced grenade launchers are exported. Recently, RPG-29 can be repeatedly seen in images from the combat zone in Syria and Iraq. Also, a number of grenade launchers with PG-29B shots are in service with Mexican paratroopers.



At the moment, Russia occupies a leading position in the field of creation and production of reusable anti-tank grenade launchers and rocket-propelled grenades attached to servicemen as a non-standard means of strengthening anti-tank defense. During the years that have passed since the collapse of the USSR, the specialists of the scientific and production association "Basalt" created a number of highly efficient grenade launchers, anti-tank and assault rocket grenades, but this is already the topic for the next publication.

Based on:
http://world.guns.ru
http://dokwar.ru
http://bazalt.ru/close_in_weapon_systems/
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    11 March 2016 07: 02
    Thank you Sergey for the excellent review! Your articles are consistent, and only pleasing!
  2. 0
    11 March 2016 07: 48
    . RPG-26 "Aglen" is in service with motorized rifle and airborne units of the Russian army. Being quite inexpensive and at the same time reliable and effective ammunition, this rocket-propelled grenade provides the defeat of modern battle tanks on board.

    and all this at 440mm penetration, and the fact that the board of the same t-72 is about 550mm of reduced homogeneous solid armor (40mm outer board, 40mm inner and 110mm pocket for combo armor) is not a fact.
    1. +3
      11 March 2016 08: 12
      Some time ago, the CT channel showed a training session of one of the Israeli special forces units .... they were armed with, in particular, RPG-16 (58,3-mm) grenade launchers .... so what do you want "Aglen" not according to "ndrav"? After all, not always a "modern battle tank" will "turn up" so that you can "revel in full"!
      1. +3
        11 March 2016 08: 25
        Here the question is not to the grenade launcher, but to what is written about it, or rather, as it is written.
        it would be written that it would provide, with a high degree of probability, the defeat of the OBT, I wouldn’t say a word (the pocket of the t-72 doesn’t cover the entire area of ​​the side), but it’s written that I saw the tank standing onboard and hit it indiscriminately and you will burn it 100%, although even an old man like the T-72 may not be too tough for this grenade. That is the essence of my post.
        1. +3
          11 March 2016 08: 54
          Well, blame me for my "misunderstanding"! And about the "defeat" of tanks ... in the Donbas for some period the main means of fighting tanks turned out to be: RPG-18, RPG-22, RPG-26 ... and, of course , RPG-7 ... where without it.
          1. +2
            11 March 2016 13: 07
            Well, at least it was, the defenders of Donbass are worthy of respect, honor and praise for their feat.
      2. +8
        11 March 2016 15: 03
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        Some time ago, on the CT channel, they showed the training of one of the units of the Israeli special forces .... they were armed with, in particular, RPG-16 grenade launchers (58,3 mm) ....

        Some AOI Special Forces units use the weapons of a potential adversary. So much easier to act in the enemy rear. Navy special forces generally use AKM as standard weapons.
        1. +3
          11 March 2016 15: 10
          Quote: professor
          Some AOI Special Forces units use the weapons of a potential adversary. So much easier to act in the enemy rear. Navy special forces generally use AKM as standard weapons.

          Oleg, good evening!
          Maybe it was an American M72 LAW?

          Externally, they are similar to the RPG-18.
          1. +6
            11 March 2016 15: 17
            Quote: Bongo
            Maybe it was an American M72 LAW?

            I didn’t even make a career in the infantry (I didn’t even reach the officer soldier ), but the inscriptions in Russian on weapons are easy to distinguish. It is in Russian, and not in Cyrillic. Sevens at one time captured so much that they were adopted by the IDF. About five years ago, conscripts still fired from them. The misfire in the captured RPGs was approximately 50%. LAU is not better. Commanders do not like them. Since during a misfire, you need to carefully put it in, leave and wait for the sappers. And the teachings are running out ...
            1. +4
              11 March 2016 15: 24
              Quote: professor
              Even though I did not make a career in the infantry (I didn’t even reach the officer), I can easily distinguish the inscriptions in Russian on weapons. It is in Russian, and not in Cyrillic. Sevens at one time captured so much that they were adopted by the IDF.

              I do not doubt it at all ... with "sevens" everything is clear, but "flies" from where?
              Quote: professor
              Since during a misfire, you need to carefully put it in, leave and wait for the sappers. And the teachings are running out ...
              I saw something like this wassat In this case, it is necessary to cock and fire again ... but if this did not work, then the officer in whose unit had such a "joy" - a big headache belay
              1. +5
                11 March 2016 15: 29
                Quote: Bongo
                I do not doubt it at all ... with "sevens" everything is clear, but "flies" from where?

                And you look for the sake of interest, the report of the Stockholm Institute about what Ukraine sold to Israel. wink

                Quote: Bongo
                I saw something like this. In this case, it is supposed to cock and fire again ... but if this did not work, then the officer in whose unit had such a "joy" - a big headache

                Here I am about that.
                1. +1
                  11 March 2016 15: 31
                  Oleg, come on already on you?
                  Quote: professor
                  And you look for the sake of interest, the report of the Stockholm Institute about what Ukraine sold to Israel.

                  Why do the Israelis need "Flies"? what Frankly, by today's standards, this is not the best option.
                  1. +2
                    11 March 2016 15: 34
                    Quote: Bongo
                    Why do the Israelis need "Flies"? Frankly speaking, it is not the best option by today's standards.

                    I do not remember the Flies in that report. I remember MANPADS. What for? And what is the same KAZ to experience? Special forces to train?
                    1. +3
                      11 March 2016 15: 37
                      Quote: professor
                      What for? And what is the same KAZ to experience? Special forces to train?

                      It's hard to say, you know better, but the RPG-18 is in many respects a problematic model with not the highest armor penetration. No wonder they were shot in Chechnya without an account (disposed of).
              2. 0
                11 March 2016 22: 27
                So that there is no "big smut" you need to have a little hole on the sidelines. Then the smut lasts the time it takes to carry it there.
    2. +4
      11 March 2016 10: 06
      Quote: cth; fyn
      and all this at 440mm penetration, and the fact that the board of the same t-72 is about 550mm of reduced homogeneous solid armor (40mm outer board, 40mm inner and 110mm pocket for combo armor) is not a fact.

      And he is not required to knock out the tank. Immobilize, create conditions for the destruction of a tank or unit grenade launcher, or "big guys".
      1. 0
        11 March 2016 13: 03
        That's it, and not what is in the article:
        . defeat of modern battle tanks on board

        defeat implies destruction, and as you and I say, this is very difficult, given the rather good reservation of modern housing.
        1. +4
          11 March 2016 13: 43
          Quote: cth; fyn
          defeat implies destruction, and as you and I say, this is very difficult, given the rather good reservation of modern housing.

          A defeat is a deprivation of the ability to perform a combat mission. And whether the tank or some other model of military equipment is destroyed or only damaged with the loss of combat capability is not important.
    3. +6
      11 March 2016 10: 31
      Quote: cth; fyn
      and all this at 440mm penetration, and the fact that the board of the same t-72 is about 550mm of reduced homogeneous solid armor (40mm outer board, 40mm inner and 110mm pocket for combo armor) is not a fact.

      I’m never a tanker, and maybe I’m mistaken, but as far as I think about the 550 mm of the T-72 side armor, you exaggerate a little. As far as I remember, the T-72 side is a monolithic armor plate of 80 mm thickness, from which 10-mm is located at a distance from the width of the track rubber screen. On which, in turn, are elements of the Kontakt-1 DZ. Unfortunately in the troops, our tanks are not always equipped with DZ blocks. So during the First Chechen tank, tanks that didn’t have DZs were quite often hit from anti-tank grenade launchers, including disposable ones.
      1. 0
        11 March 2016 12: 57
        The most interesting thing that I also thought
        1. +1
          11 March 2016 13: 43
          Quote: cth; fyn
          The most interesting thing that I also thought

          And what is wrong?
  3. +2
    11 March 2016 09: 02
    Sergei! Hi! I heard the story of the RPG-18 "Fly" from a man who served in the security of our embassy in the Middle East. According to him, the grenade launcher was seized there. He did not give details, but said that it was still those adventures to deliver it to Moscow.
    1. +5
      11 March 2016 10: 11
      Quote: Amurets
      Sergei! Hi! I heard the story of the RPG-18 "Fly" from a man who served in the security of our embassy in the Middle East. According to him, the grenade launcher was seized there. He did not give details, but said that it was still those adventures to deliver it to Moscow.

      Hi Nikolay! I don’t know about the Middle East. request But in Vietnam, the Vietnamese American M72 LAWs were definitely captured. Only in the 1975 year, the North Vietnamese captured the 63000 M72 LAW grenade launchers. And American disposable grenade launchers appeared in Southeast Asia, apparently earlier than in Israel.
  4. +1
    11 March 2016 09: 16
    Excellent_article, author ++
  5. +1
    11 March 2016 09: 26
    Thank you, good work, we look forward to continuing
  6. +9
    11 March 2016 10: 31
    Paradoxically, but the "ideal grenade launcher" perhaps remains the good old "seven" - it is too simple and, as a result, a reliable and versatile unit. And it is modernized by replacing the ammunition thanks to the over-caliber warhead easily and simply. Make shrapnel ammunition with a programmable radio fuse and here's a "thunderstorm of helicopters and drones" ...
    1. +9
      11 March 2016 10: 40
      Quote: Taoist
      Paradoxically, but the "ideal grenade launcher" perhaps remains the good old "seven" - it is too simple and, as a result, a reliable and versatile unit. And it is modernized by replacing the ammunition thanks to the over-caliber warhead easily and simply. Make shrapnel ammunition with a programmable radio fuse and here's a "thunderstorm of helicopters and drones" ...

      And there is Yes According to the criterion of "cost-effectiveness" RPG-7 is still not equal! It is no coincidence that the "seven" is the most widespread anti-tank grenade launcher in the world.
      1. +1
        11 March 2016 10: 59
        The RPG 7 has become the most widespread thanks to the USSR, namely gratuitous assistance to friendly countries, as well as numerous copies produced abroad.
        1. +5
          11 March 2016 11: 02
          Quote: Vadim237
          The RPG 7 has become the most widespread thanks to the USSR, namely gratuitous assistance to friendly countries, as well as numerous copies produced abroad.

          Certainly Yes But this does not mean that the RPG-7 is not an effective weapon. If this were not so, it would not have been produced abroad and it would not have enjoyed such popularity in the world.
          1. +6
            11 March 2016 11: 26
            Quote: Bongo
            But this does not mean that RPG-7 is not an effective weapon

            Like the S-75. What is the set of missiles. So is the RPG-7. A large set of grenades. The men who served in the sapper-assault battalion trained the URah of the Steel Belt, they say that the grenade got into the embrasure, the unit was zeroed. They trained like that on old Bunkers of Chinese ur pass. They said that the T-55 with a flamethrower was more effective.
      2. 0
        11 March 2016 12: 09
        Quote: Bongo
        According to the criterion of "cost-effectiveness" RPG-7 is still not equal! It is no coincidence that the "seven" is the most widespread anti-tank grenade launcher in the world.

        Received an answer to the PM. Mail does not work again.
      3. +2
        11 March 2016 15: 12
        Quote: Bongo
        So it is According to the criterion of "cost-effectiveness" RPG-7 is still no equal! It is no coincidence that the "seven" is the most widespread anti-tank grenade launcher in the world.

        Not certainly in that way. The cost of the Seven does not include the costs of its development and preparation for production. About 10 years ago I read an article about how many different research institutes took part in its development. Precipitated.
        1. +5
          11 March 2016 15: 15
          Quote: professor
          Not certainly in that way. The cost of the Seven does not include the costs of its development and preparation for production. About 10 years ago I read an article about how many different research institutes took part in its development. Precipitated.

          Oleg, who in the 60s counted money for defense spending in the USSR? One way or another, the finances spent on the development of the RPG-7 have long been "recaptured". And it seems to me that it was far from the most expensive military development.
          1. +4
            11 March 2016 15: 21
            Quote: Bongo
            Oleg, who in the 60s counted money for defense spending in the USSR? One way or another, the finances spent on the development of the RPG-7 have long been "recaptured". And it seems to me that it was far from the most expensive military development.

            This is true, but if you compare the price of the Soviet (I almost wrote our laughing ) weapons with the bourgeois, it must be considered the same.

            PS
            Sorry, I can't find that article. The author had a Tatar surname. I don't remember any other "hints".
            Respect to you for the article. hi
            1. +3
              11 March 2016 15: 27
              Quote: professor
              This is true, but if we compare the price of Soviet (I almost wrote our) weapons with bourgeois weapons, then we must consider the same.

              It is now, in the USSR, however, there was a different alignment. request So no one in the world could afford to build a nuclear submarine from titanium.
              Quote: professor
              Respect to you for the article.

              drinks
              It is a pity that your publications have not been seen for a long time. crying
              1. +2
                11 March 2016 15: 31
                Quote: Bongo
                It is now, in the USSR, however, there was a different alignment.

                Nevertheless, speaking about "cheapness" it is necessary to count correctly.

                Quote: Bongo
                It is a pity that your publications have not been seen for a long time.

                As I promised, I don’t write here anymore. hi
                1. +6
                  11 March 2016 15: 34
                  Quote: professor
                  As I promised, I don’t write here anymore.

                  In my opinion, "Voennoye Obozreniye" has lost a lot from this, although all sorts of Nazis and uryalka are probably calmer. request
                2. +4
                  11 March 2016 15: 40
                  Quote: professor
                  As I promised, I don’t write here anymore.

                  By the way, promised 1000 articles feel
                  1. +2
                    11 March 2016 15: 42
                    Quote: Ruslan67
                    By the way, promised 1000 articles

                    Nice try, but I didn’t promise that. wink
                    1. +1
                      11 March 2016 15: 44
                      Quote: professor
                      I did not promise this.

                      It was Yes I just can’t remember what Here or all request
  7. +3
    11 March 2016 10: 55
    good continuation of the review! Thank you for the article! Effectively!
    1. +2
      11 March 2016 12: 14
      When and from where Iran got the RPG-29 "Vampire" is not exactly known perhaps from Syria, for example, and maybe direct deliveries from our country. From the beginning, firing shots at him began to flicker at the exhibitions, and then the Iranian Defense Industry Organization announced the start of the production of grenades at it at its plants.

      Then the RPG-29 "Vampire" itself or a copy of which the Iranians gave the name Ghadir flashed in parades and various gun salons.

  8. +5
    11 March 2016 11: 58
    The photo of the instruction on the RPG case, reminiscent of the case from the movie "Commando". laughing
  9. +2
    11 March 2016 12: 00
    Okfol-octogen is phlegmatic, not plasticized. Which, in fact, is read by the abbreviation.
    1. +6
      11 March 2016 12: 25
      Quote: volan
      Okfol-octogen is phlegmatic, not plasticized. Which, in fact, is read by the abbreviation.

      The trick is that phlegmatizer is ceresin. Speaking simultaneously plasticizer.
      So you can call it so, and so, no mistake.
      1. +6
        11 March 2016 12: 31
        Quote: Spade
        The trick is that phlegmatizer is ceresin. Speaking simultaneously plasticizer.
        So you can call it so, and so, no mistake.


        For military purposes, HMX is often used as a basis for the manufacture of such explosive mixtures as "octol" (77 percent of HMX and 23 percent of TNT) and "okfol" (95 percent of HMX and 5 percent of a plasticizer). Plasticized HMX is used for the manufacture of heat-resistant shaped charges. The penetration capacity of shaped charges made from HMX is 10% higher than charges from RDX.
  10. +1
    11 March 2016 13: 45
    Author!
    WELL DONE !!!
    Great article, all about the case, without hohlosrach and glory to Putin
  11. +4
    11 March 2016 14: 58
    Knowledgeable people, enlighten. What is the niche RPG-29 in the army? The harmonious system is traced: the individual weapon of the fighter (RPG-18 / 22 / 26 / 27) - PT means of separation (RPG-7) - companies (Metis) - battalion (Bassoon / Cornet). It is logical to assume that the RPG-29 appeared to replace the LNG-9, but there is no place for it in the anti-tank platoon of the battalion in the existing OSh, as there is no fragmentation munition. As an option - mainly an export model, an ersatz of an light ATGM for the poor + a mobilization option, i.e. company link. I'm right?
    1. +5
      11 March 2016 15: 04
      Quote: vch62388
      Knowledgeable people, enlighten. What is the niche RPG-29 in the army? The harmonious system is traced: the individual weapon of the fighter (RPG-18 / 22 / 26 / 27) - PT means of separation (RPG-7) - companies (Metis) - battalion (Bassoon / Cornet). It is logical to assume that the RPG-29 appeared to replace the LNG-9, but there is no place for it in the anti-tank platoon of the battalion in the existing OSh, as there is no fragmentation munition. As an option - mainly an export model, an ersatz of an light ATGM for the poor + a mobilization option, i.e. company link. I'm right?

      In general - yes Yes But when firing at manpower, the TBG-29В thermobaric shot is even more effective than the OG-9. Well, I think it’s not even worth comparing them by explosive action.
    2. +1
      11 March 2016 21: 25
      Quote: vch62388
      Enlightening people, enlighten. What is the niche of the RPG-29 in the army?

      And no, why do you think the RPG-29 was put into service in 1989 but was not produced for the USSR / RF Armed Forces? He simply did not find and will not find a place in the staffing table - he is corny morally outdated even during development, and the author repeats the clichés from the category of stories about "no analogues". Well, the "seven" will steer in the troops for a very long time, and its over-caliberness allows you to simply adapt it to different ammunition.
  12. +1
    11 March 2016 20: 53
    Here from such things a quick fire at a liberal gathering in Vilnius !!! High-explosive feed all this riffraff!
  13. +2
    11 March 2016 21: 08
    To bring the RPG-18 into a combat position, it is necessary to remove the safety lock and move the launch canister apart. End caps recline automatically when casting, the safety strut with a diopter sight, and the front sight move into a vertical position. After determining the distance, selecting the appropriate aiming mark and aiming by pressing the trigger lever, a grenade is launched. After bringing into combat the return of the RPG-18 back to the marching is impossible. Not used for the intended purpose, the cocked jet grenades must be fired towards the enemy or blown up at a safe distance.
    Where did the author get this from? RPG 18 does not have checks, only the front cover is "automatically" folded back, moreover, in order to expand the pipes, you first need to fold the back cover, "After determining the distance, choosing the appropriate aiming mark and aiming the trigger, nothing will happen because before all manipulations with determining the range and aiming need to cock the trigger by turning the diopter stand down - in general, for knowledge of the material part of the RPG-18, a solid two laughing
  14. +2
    12 March 2016 02: 02
    When I served as an emergency in the 80s in Primorye, we were armed with RKG-3 grenades. I even took a few parachutes home. For memory.
  15. 0
    13 March 2016 02: 27
    BLLL - THAT'S WHAT THE INFANTRY MEAN !!!!!!!!!! --- BUT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING - THROW SUSA THAN BETTER THAN BETTER !! THING !!!!!!!! wink
  16. 0
    14 March 2016 00: 53
    But about RPG-28, 30, 32 will be continued?
  17. -1
    23 March 2016 17: 38
    RPG with one shot will sink nimitz.infa 100%
  18. 0
    25 March 2016 00: 16
    I would also like to see the results of the shooting. For example, a product shot at Abrams.