Yavlinsky is dreaming of victory over Putin, or Yabloko on a slice
There is an early spring on the calendar, and before the parliamentary elections it is still more than six months, but the candidate enthusiasm of individual politicians has already begun to show itself. And if some candidates direct their attention to the elections to the State Duma, which are scheduled for September of this year, then others have truly Napoleonic plans. Grigory Yavlinsky, the head of the Yabloko faction in the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg, also turned out to be one of the representatives of the political fields that have plans for the years ahead. In his speech at the congress of the Yabloko party, Yavlinsky told about how the victorious march would pass through the crucible of the Russian elections, and both parliamentary and presidential.
It was Yavlinsky who decided to elect from the Yabloko party as the presidential candidate of the Russian Federation (elections in 2018), and as a response and thank-you word, usually phlegmatic Grigory Alekseevich, falling into rage, declared that he would not let down his party partners and literally crush all his opponents, including Vladimir Putin.
In an interview with Interfax journalists Andrei Novikov and Vasily Antipin, Yavlinsky stated that no ratings of the current president (and according to average estimates of sociological monitoring services, these ratings are in the 80-82% mark) cannot interfere with him (Yavlinsky). According to the chief apple, he intends to win the presidential election.
Attention is drawn to the fact that Mr. Yavlinsky is in favor of holding a presidential election not in the 2018 year, but earlier. According to the head of the “apple” faction in the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Capital, the situation in Russia is so bad that it does not preclude the holding of presidential elections not in 2018, but already in 2017. The position is approximately as follows: Putin will have to ask the people himself whether he trusts him (Putin) to run the state in the current situation or not. In other words, the arrows are transferred to the current head of state with a promise in the style: “what are you, not a kid? .. - let's face off in early elections, or weakly ...”
Yavlinsky (quoted on the official Online Yabloko) during its speech entitled “We choose freedom” and “Russia is demanding change”:
The European way and the European dream ... Hmm ... Somewhere we have already heard. Are there really lace panties and parades of “freedom” taken from the top on the cell phone camera by the “best friends” of the Russian people? ..
Yavlinsky in an interview Interfax:
In other words, before the representatives of the opposition today is the most important task: to “dissolve” the Kremlin for early elections, and the sooner such elections are held, the better. Why? The fact is that until 2018, a lot of water can really flow away, and the liberals cannot afford to wait - all of a sudden: a) Moscow’s efforts will bring the Syrian issue to a real peaceful settlement and end the bloody war, b) adequate power will come to power in the West political forces due to at least the fact that something needs to be done with a huge flow of migrants, and - c) a barrel of oil to 2018 will go to a significant increase ... Suddenly ... And while the barrel walks at critically low for the Russian economy while valiant eco ohmic block of the Russian government mumbles something about the cycle of three-year recession, while in the West extend more anti-Russian sanctions, liberal politicians really want to take a moment and discontent of certain groups of the population to break the power.
At the same time, Yavlinsky and his party members are clearly counting on support (and financially, too, is not excluded) from all the same Western "friends" of the Russian people. Moreover, they are counting so as not to scare away the oscillating electorate within the country. This is expressed, for example, in this way: Mr. Yavlinsky declares that if he is in the presidential chair, he will raise the issue of transferring Crimea to Ukraine "in the framework of a referendum under international control." Well, apparently, “under international control” - it’s the same as it used to be in Kosovo - when no referendum was needed, and historical part of Serbia was simply sawn off with a rusty military-political saw, without even thinking to ask the opinion of the population. And Grigory Alekseevich is well aware of the methods of "international control" in such matters.
At the same time, Yavlinsky, preserving, as already noted, hesitant, declares that with PARNAS, “Apple” seems not to be on the way. As if ... Although they, too, are trying to hang noodles about “freedom” and “European choice”, as well as about how it is necessary “to return the Crimeans to the bosom of nenki-Ukraine”. The question is that PARNAS has already slept on receiving all sorts of cookies from you know who, and Yabloko seems to be not even wormy at all, that's why Grigory Alekseevich is trying to distance himself from contacting overseas curators and lists of people for anti-Russian sanctions. Frankly speaking, such ostentatious distancing from one’s own people by the Yabloko looks ridiculous ... Well, they, of course, will say that the one who laughs last is laughing. Well - the cards in hand ...
So, Grigory Alekseevich declares that the economic situation in the country is full of seams and he, if elected, will of course give the necessary impetus to the economy. Wait, but didn’t Grigori Alekseevich once headed the State Commission for Economic Reform in the days of the collapse of the USSR? Didn't Mr. Yavlinsky work as the Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers? Wasn’t Mr. Yavlinsky and his associates at the forefront of privatization, as a result of which all the most important state assets moved into the hands of the oligarchy? Or again, "I am not me", "were not allowed to work" and "wanted the best"?
From the program to which Grigory Alekseevich was directly involved:
The extravaganza, of course, is complete ... The 90 began, the country breathed its last, inflationary risks increased, eating up all the savings of citizens, and here, you understand, “use their money to buy property”. Judging by further developments, citizens who really had money to participate in the privatization, at that time there was a man in the country 10-15, including, for example, Boris Abramovich Berezovsky, a lover of London fogs and soft scarves.
And now Mr. Yavlinsky again declares that he, he says, will raise the economy and carry out reforms for the people. Bu-ga-ga! .. By the way, today Grigory Alekseevich also denounces the privatization of 90's, stating that "someone did something wrong."
Yavlinsky in an interview with Interfax:
And what are you, my dear, not bothered to preserve the state in internationally recognized borders in 1991 year?
Or was the conjuncture inverse? ..
In general, with such a political baggage remains only for the presidency. To complete the incomplete "partners"? ..
It was Yavlinsky who decided to elect from the Yabloko party as the presidential candidate of the Russian Federation (elections in 2018), and as a response and thank-you word, usually phlegmatic Grigory Alekseevich, falling into rage, declared that he would not let down his party partners and literally crush all his opponents, including Vladimir Putin.
In an interview with Interfax journalists Andrei Novikov and Vasily Antipin, Yavlinsky stated that no ratings of the current president (and according to average estimates of sociological monitoring services, these ratings are in the 80-82% mark) cannot interfere with him (Yavlinsky). According to the chief apple, he intends to win the presidential election.
Attention is drawn to the fact that Mr. Yavlinsky is in favor of holding a presidential election not in the 2018 year, but earlier. According to the head of the “apple” faction in the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Capital, the situation in Russia is so bad that it does not preclude the holding of presidential elections not in 2018, but already in 2017. The position is approximately as follows: Putin will have to ask the people himself whether he trusts him (Putin) to run the state in the current situation or not. In other words, the arrows are transferred to the current head of state with a promise in the style: “what are you, not a kid? .. - let's face off in early elections, or weakly ...”
Yavlinsky (quoted on the official Online Yabloko) during its speech entitled “We choose freedom” and “Russia is demanding change”:
Today, our main obstacle to the future is not even Putin himself and his system, but apathy. Apathy and disbelief. And this political apathy is an opponent no less serious than those who sit in the Kremlin and in the Duma. Because when the majority in the country is apathetic, it is the marginals who begin to rule the ball, create and dictate the agenda. ("marginals" - this, apparently, those who do not share the ideals of Mr. Yavlinsky - author's note).
Russia found itself in this position not because of external enemies and not because of the notorious “Russian rut”, but because until now reforms and changes in the country were planned and implemented not for people. They were made to build socialism, to build capitalism and a market economy, to create an energy superpower for nothing, to support and conquer Novorossia, to have Kremlin residents respected in the world and feared - for anything, reforms and policies were carried out except for the citizens of the country. My task as president is reform for the majority.
The only national idea that is true for Russia is respect for the person. This is the most accurate and understandable formula for Russia of the European way and the European dream.
Russia found itself in this position not because of external enemies and not because of the notorious “Russian rut”, but because until now reforms and changes in the country were planned and implemented not for people. They were made to build socialism, to build capitalism and a market economy, to create an energy superpower for nothing, to support and conquer Novorossia, to have Kremlin residents respected in the world and feared - for anything, reforms and policies were carried out except for the citizens of the country. My task as president is reform for the majority.
The only national idea that is true for Russia is respect for the person. This is the most accurate and understandable formula for Russia of the European way and the European dream.
The European way and the European dream ... Hmm ... Somewhere we have already heard. Are there really lace panties and parades of “freedom” taken from the top on the cell phone camera by the “best friends” of the Russian people? ..
Yavlinsky in an interview Interfax:
The economic situation, from my point of view, looks so bad that a year later the early elections can become a reality: Putin will want to spend them ahead of time so as not to wait for further deterioration and take advantage of the current level of support. Look here. Last year, real incomes fell by 10%. What will happen this year? And in a year? He never led the elections in a situation of a trend for a fall, in the face of a serious socio-economic crisis. For him, this situation is incomprehensible. The situation in the country will be very difficult, but I would not want Russia to be plunged into chaos.
In other words, before the representatives of the opposition today is the most important task: to “dissolve” the Kremlin for early elections, and the sooner such elections are held, the better. Why? The fact is that until 2018, a lot of water can really flow away, and the liberals cannot afford to wait - all of a sudden: a) Moscow’s efforts will bring the Syrian issue to a real peaceful settlement and end the bloody war, b) adequate power will come to power in the West political forces due to at least the fact that something needs to be done with a huge flow of migrants, and - c) a barrel of oil to 2018 will go to a significant increase ... Suddenly ... And while the barrel walks at critically low for the Russian economy while valiant eco ohmic block of the Russian government mumbles something about the cycle of three-year recession, while in the West extend more anti-Russian sanctions, liberal politicians really want to take a moment and discontent of certain groups of the population to break the power.
At the same time, Yavlinsky and his party members are clearly counting on support (and financially, too, is not excluded) from all the same Western "friends" of the Russian people. Moreover, they are counting so as not to scare away the oscillating electorate within the country. This is expressed, for example, in this way: Mr. Yavlinsky declares that if he is in the presidential chair, he will raise the issue of transferring Crimea to Ukraine "in the framework of a referendum under international control." Well, apparently, “under international control” - it’s the same as it used to be in Kosovo - when no referendum was needed, and historical part of Serbia was simply sawn off with a rusty military-political saw, without even thinking to ask the opinion of the population. And Grigory Alekseevich is well aware of the methods of "international control" in such matters.
At the same time, Yavlinsky, preserving, as already noted, hesitant, declares that with PARNAS, “Apple” seems not to be on the way. As if ... Although they, too, are trying to hang noodles about “freedom” and “European choice”, as well as about how it is necessary “to return the Crimeans to the bosom of nenki-Ukraine”. The question is that PARNAS has already slept on receiving all sorts of cookies from you know who, and Yabloko seems to be not even wormy at all, that's why Grigory Alekseevich is trying to distance himself from contacting overseas curators and lists of people for anti-Russian sanctions. Frankly speaking, such ostentatious distancing from one’s own people by the Yabloko looks ridiculous ... Well, they, of course, will say that the one who laughs last is laughing. Well - the cards in hand ...
So, Grigory Alekseevich declares that the economic situation in the country is full of seams and he, if elected, will of course give the necessary impetus to the economy. Wait, but didn’t Grigori Alekseevich once headed the State Commission for Economic Reform in the days of the collapse of the USSR? Didn't Mr. Yavlinsky work as the Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers? Wasn’t Mr. Yavlinsky and his associates at the forefront of privatization, as a result of which all the most important state assets moved into the hands of the oligarchy? Or again, "I am not me", "were not allowed to work" and "wanted the best"?
From the program to which Grigory Alekseevich was directly involved:
The program aims to ensure that people can use their money to purchase property (as part of privatization).
The extravaganza, of course, is complete ... The 90 began, the country breathed its last, inflationary risks increased, eating up all the savings of citizens, and here, you understand, “use their money to buy property”. Judging by further developments, citizens who really had money to participate in the privatization, at that time there was a man in the country 10-15, including, for example, Boris Abramovich Berezovsky, a lover of London fogs and soft scarves.
And now Mr. Yavlinsky again declares that he, he says, will raise the economy and carry out reforms for the people. Bu-ga-ga! .. By the way, today Grigory Alekseevich also denounces the privatization of 90's, stating that "someone did something wrong."
Yavlinsky in an interview with Interfax:
I want my country to have internationally recognized borders.
And what are you, my dear, not bothered to preserve the state in internationally recognized borders in 1991 year?
Or was the conjuncture inverse? ..
In general, with such a political baggage remains only for the presidency. To complete the incomplete "partners"? ..
Information