Laughter through tears: did Khodakovsky ruin the chapel too?

43
Recently, it seems that we are witnessing the last act of some kind of tragicomedy. The point is not even that in Donetsk they somehow suddenly took up arms against Khodakovsky. Whether he is good or bad is a matter of personal opinion of everyone, and an opinion is made up of the information received. Accordingly, who you read / watch, these are the conclusions.

Why was I hooked on Khodakovsky? The most mentally flawed part will naturally say that Akhmetov bought me with giblets, or recruited the SBU. Already used to say, and more than once. However, as in the cases with Khodakovsky (forgive me for being so close by), it is absolutely unproven. First, prove it, and then we'll talk.

With regards to Alexander Sergeevich, no one has ever really been able to prove his connection with Akhmetov. And, apparently, will not prove. On the one hand, this is unrealistic, otherwise they would have already proved a hundred times, on the other hand, Khodakovsky would definitely be devoured before anyone could find at least some more or less edible information. Everything goes to that.

So why Hodakovsky? And everything is simple. He is really the last. The last of the militia of such a high level. Moreover, if you dig around very carefully, the picture will be even less pleasant. They have already removed commanders of the company level who have manifested themselves in 2014-2015. Soon, in general, it will be possible to talk about those who remained, counting them on one hand’s fingers. Well, Givi will remain. Someone has to say to the camera what they send from the administration. Moreover, unlike Motorola, Givi is not going anywhere, he will say.

But these are problems of another kind. There is a King in the Ministry of Defense, let him have a headache, who will fight tomorrow. Unless, of course, such a need is still under consideration. Therefore, it is easy to think about how easily the sent "Cross" and his fighters sent to replace the shot "correct" soldiers sent to replace them.

And so everything is fine. The republic is taking great strides along the path of building its bright future, without being too distracted by those who want to prevent it from doing so. This, of course, can not but rejoice. Well, who wants to really prevent ...

Distract your attention to the nursery incident. A little later, understand what's what. So, my colleagues from “Look” were not too lazy, and found the friends of the Kolganovs, who confirmed to them all the facts that were set forth by those who spoke about this stories. And surely they added something from themselves, so apparently, it should be continued. I shared the photos that my friends from Donetsk made a few days ago.

The nursery is empty. Dogs or dismantled the owners, or took good people. The territory is protected from those who want to take pictures of incomprehensible personalities. In general - the spin took place, the page can be closed. Judging by some publications in the DPR media, Kolganov can search for truth wherever and wherever he pleases, but the fact that the property and land of the klyat Ukrainians, parasitizing on Donetsk land from 1988 onwards, became the property of more worthy people (deputy Belyaev, I recall) is indisputable .









It is reasonable to ask: what’s the reason for Hodakovsky? And everything is simple. He defended a retired colonel on his websites, who did not want to voluntarily share a good piece of land in favor of the servants and builders of the republic - which means the enemy. Oppositionist. Well, the fact that many people supported this story and betrayed it publicly played only against him. Support the enemies ...

Good. God bless him, with a nursery, he let him give health to all Kolganov and the strength to survive what the republic presented to them in the person of Grisha Belyaev. It would be better, of course, this would-be deputy would be punished, but, obviously, not in the jurisdiction of the Almighty. Or the time has not come yet, and Belyaev will still be a test of God for someone else. We'll see.

We go further. What is there with us? A commission. To investigate the crimes against Khodakovskogo republic. The list, of course, is impressive. Walk on.

Khodakovsky is very vehemently accused of having illegally appropriated (or "Vostok") a network of gas stations. And I earned money for them. What is the most piquant, an occasion to rebel against the topic of pressing the gas station was ... statements by Khodakovsky himself on the Internet. And the owners, what is most interesting, did not file any claims against Khodakovsky.

Say, intimidated, using your resource brigade "East"? Yes, he could. But why then did the prosecutor's office and the military police of the DPR at one time be inundated with statements from citizens working at these gas stations? Exactly about capturing? That's just not mentioned there Khodakov for some reason. And completely different faces. Former owner of these gas stations Lilia Anisimovna Gadzhiyeva in a statement points to some Herman and Theodore. Which actually took gas stations from her and then removed all the equipment from them.

Herman is Herman Kadyrov. The military police very quickly installed it. But I couldn’t do anything again. Since Kadyrov is not a retired colonel with dogs, but a deputy of the Parliament of the DPR with authority. And Fedor is Fedor Savelyev, his right hand. Friend, friend and feed. Former employee of the brigade "Vostok", caught red-handed when pressing for himself another gas station on the street. Gornostaevskaya.

Saveliev was sent to the penal company, but how was Herman without a friend? Naturally pulled out. And the sweet couple continued to build a bright future for themselves.

By the way, dear readers, and you know, who initiated the "petrol station case"? Probably not believe it. Deputy German Kadyrov !!! Well, the "group of deputies" with him at the head.

Indeed, why not? Refueling something workers. Sin is not to overcome the villain Khodakovsky in favor of the worker for the benefit of the republic of Kadyrov.

By the way, they sent me a few photos that show what these gas stations looked like when they pressed Vostok from the type. Here they are.















It is clear that such good would lie on the streets of Donetsk to this day. Until there is a fool who will restore them and run. Such a fool was found. Moreover, he also concluded an official agreement with fuel suppliers and began to trade in this fuel. Officially. Paying taxes. Yes, and talk about it on the Internet.

No, with such it is necessary to definitely fight the whole republic. People like Khodakovsky will not bring to the good.

The plundering of state property.

This formulation, taken, by the way, from the comic site of the Donetsk KVN team "Parliament" delights. Whose, sorry, property plundered Khodakovsky? What state, excuse me? Funny, honestly. I didn’t understand for laughter, to be honest, did the Ukrainians complain? As far as I know, the buildings of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, the Security Service of Ukraine and other offices were captured when there was no talk about the DPR. So, Khodakovsky caused harm to these state structures?

But since such a booze has gone, let the DPR parliament send official requests to all possible places. Once they decided to ask Khodakovsky in full, let him answer for everything!

For the concrete blocks that went to the roadblocks. For the forest, which went to the dugout and trench. For the products that Khodakovsky requisitioned at the Yasinovataya railway station. Especially it is necessary to ask for the part that was distributed to local residents. Surely, not a single resident took eight signatures for products issued to him. So, there was a real opportunity for personal enrichment. The only question is what kind of state all this belonged to.

But once a decision was made that Khodakovsky, too, had destroyed the chapel, it would be necessary to build on this fact.

And if already without laughter, then the whole picture is sad. In fact, the clearing of the republic from those who had at least some relation to the creation of the DNR is ending. The fact that Khodakovsky turned out to be really one of the last is, in principle, not an indicator. In his place could be anyone of those who in one way or another was out of work. Someone was lucky to repeat the path of Bezler, someone was unlucky. This is me about the victims of the elusive RDG MAT.

The only question is who comes to replace those who are not afraid to go to the front. But he preferred to sit out and now rushed to build a republic. And we will see the result of this so-called shock construction soon. Only for whom this construction hits? For some reason, for those who defended the Donetsk land with weapons in hands, and not with a microphone, as the notorious "people's mayor".

And for the sake of this, it is possible to retreat from the Constitution "in a lump sum" and, retroactively, a year ago, to dismiss the Security Council Secretary, and the President of the People's Council to remove it completely lawlessly ... Everything is possible.

Excuse me, is this a republic? It is doubtful.

Everything goes to the fact that the republic will remain on paper or in our memory. In fact, there will be a czar-father Zakharchenko, yes loyal and loyal (again, to whom) boyars like Kadyrov, Belyaev, Pushilin and Gubarev.

Somalatina, for short.

It's a shame. It's a shame not for the so-called republic, not for Khodakovsky. For him, by the way, is not insulting. He, at least, is still alive. As it will be there, time will tell. "DRG MAT" has not been canceled, of course.

All the fault of Lieutenant Colonel Special Forces Khodakovsky is clear and understandable to me personally. A commando can never become a politician. Proved by Kvashnin. Proved by Swan. Will not give. No country. For many reasons, there is no point in citing.

It's a shame for another. It's a shame for those of our guys who stayed there forever. Someone was lucky, and at least they were buried in their native land. For some, it was Donetsk land that became the last refuge. It is probably good that Knysh, Cheder, Shkolnik, Koumiss, the people I met there, and who could not return from there, would not see what they fought for.

They came from Russia to fight not for refueling for German Kadyrov and not for the recreation center for Belyaev. They died for the Russian Donbass, and not for Donetsk Somalia.

Write me down by anyone, but as a person who has spent some bit of his life on Donbass being a Russian, I will never stop poking into the eyes of our guys who stayed there, to those who forgot about it so quickly.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    4 March 2016 06: 49
    Hmm ... About Shirokino right in the eye .. They crossed the cross, and after him his soldiers wrote reports .. They came ... about .. militia members. And at the very first shelling from a standpoint ... Ukrainians entered as if in their own house ...
    1. +2
      4 March 2016 10: 25
      If the Donetsk and Khodakovsky understand, then what are we to hold rallies against this? In place, it is somehow more visible whether they have a republic or not. hi
      1. +4
        4 March 2016 10: 29
        Rallies, perhaps, makes no sense. Just be aware, think with your head and draw appropriate conclusions. So that later it would not be excruciatingly painful to shout "Everything has been leaked!".
    2. RDX
      +5
      4 March 2016 11: 37
      but where did he prove himself, this Khodokovskty? no where but sabotage
      1. +1
        4 March 2016 15: 10
        Well, for example the Airport. Or do you think there was no one except Sparta and Samali? There was also the East. If you haven't heard of this, then how would your problem be. Type in Google "Sheba" and "Thunder" - these are those who, according to your question, were not at the "airport" and lost their legs gathering flowers near Moscow.
      2. +6
        4 March 2016 15: 20
        Quote: RDX
        but where did he prove himself, this Khodokovskty? no where but sabotage


        He immediately showed himself. When in the first days of the turmoil everyone waved flags and shouted "treason", he calmly sat to himself like that "like treason, but it seems normal" and did not particularly shine with anti-Ukrainian ideas, even on the contrary, as it turned out that he was right in Kiev that they are destroying the peace, that they say they get excited but they do everything right. From the beginning it was evident that he was worshiping the wrong gods. All his actions and words initially looked strange, it just now became why. From the very beginning, he was only on his side.
  2. +5
    4 March 2016 06: 55
    I will repeat myself, but N. Fomenko was right when he joked: "The further into the forest, the thicker the partisans."
    1. 0
      5 March 2016 16: 50
      It's a shame for another. It's a shame for those of our guys who stayed there forever. Someone was lucky, and at least they were buried in their native land.


      Here again, over and over again, the site raises internal showdowns "Khokhlov with Ukrainians". Maybe let them figure it out on their own, or some way to create an opinion. So, to be honest, for the majority of Russians this is not something that is interesting for a long time, but by and large "to the light bulb." Just don't talk about the fraternal people and geopolitics. Today I ran into a store, one lady came to her mother from Kiev and rinses the whole store that it's all Putin's fault in general. , not in Moscow or St. Petersburg.
      Moreover, this is not the first or second experience of communicating with "ordinary Ukrainians", so let them sort it out and sort it out on the respective websites. After all, we can't understand from here who squeezed something out of who and who is cooler. It is not necessary to drag this "d....." (Insert any word here) here. Moreover, there are more than enough cases of betrayal and setting up a volunteer, and not only from the Russian Federation.
      Here is such a conclusion, personally from me.
  3. +9
    4 March 2016 07: 09
    The author is grieving about the Russian guys. But weren’t the fault of Khodakovsky the Russian volunteers who defended the airport? This is said by those who fought there. And the author of this article himself fought with Khodakovsky?
    1. 0
      4 March 2016 08: 23
      This accusation would make sense if Khodakovsky was an army officer with military experience.
      1. +2
        4 March 2016 08: 30
        The accusation is based not on the stories of those who fought there, but on an interview with Givi. And there are a lot of questions to him too.
        1. +1
          4 March 2016 10: 15
          Quote: domokl
          The accusation is based not on the stories of those who fought there, but on an interview with Givi. And there are a lot of questions to him too.

          Musin also has a series of interviews on the same topic. There is generally nothing to comment on. All have long been disassembled already.

          As for the clip with Tolstoy in the frame "I don't believe a single word", this is not an interview - this is a compilation from another, large interview with a selection of phrases taken out of context. In fact - a forgery.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      4 March 2016 10: 24
      I would put it more precisely, not through his fault, but ON HIS ORDERS they were destroyed. HE also ... is silent all the time ... PADLA Where did Kamaz go with the weapons that these volunteers brought with them.
    4. +12
      4 March 2016 10: 50
      All those who defended the airport died because of Khodakovsky? Yes, you even surpassed Musin, my dear. I did not fight with Khodakovsky. I just observe the situation with eyes and ears, both with my own and with people who have nothing to do with Hodakovsky.

      Do you want to be removed? Yes, it will be removed, do not worry, we personally have no doubt about it. Not the first case, as it were.

      Another question: what next? Does this bring someone back from the dead? And then, that his, for the incompetent command removed?

      How many experienced fighters have already gone home? How many experienced commanders removed? I wrote in Russian like that the point is not in Skiff, but in the trend itself. Will remove all, then what, I ask?

      And then there will be a dozen of Shirokino, fleeing non-fired militias who came to the army for rations and wages, and shouts "Russia, help me out."

      But to help out, as in 2013 will not go. And, frankly, I will not sway myself. Because it will be necessary to help out first of all those who are satisfied with this one in the DPR today.

      Your naivety, with which you greet the dispersal of the old militia, is admirable. But I am a person with a good memory, and God forbid, if I am right. Then I’ll write another article where I’ll put your own words in your eyes.

      In the meantime, continue to joyfully ride.
      1. 0
        4 March 2016 11: 17
        Quote: Banshee
        How many experienced fighters have already gone home? ... They will remove everyone, then what, I ask?

        nothing special, I suppose. The Hohls still hold a pause and take over the hands of the Donbass. But there’s no one to fight, and for nothing, they themselves wrote.
        1. Mobius
          0
          4 March 2016 14: 37
          Quote: Zeppelin ml.
          nothing special, I suppose. The Hohls still hold a pause and take over the hands of the Donbass. But there’s no one to fight, and for nothing, they themselves wrote.


          These are precisely the sentiments expressed in your commentary (I hope this is banter?), In the minds and bodies that are not strong with knowledge and spirit, can cause such publications.

          It will not be written. Neither your way, nor apocalyptic as the author. Donbass grows stronger, Russia behind him. The victory will be ours!

          And this is not pathos ... A CONFIDENCE.
      2. Mobius
        +3
        4 March 2016 14: 24
        Quote: Banshee
        All defending the airport died due to the fault of Khodakovsky?

        Of course not all. But the death of those whose death was at least a consequence of someone’s slackness, negligence (if we use such a term in wartime), inaction, requires proceedings.
        And the further situation with the loss of the airport, shelling of the city, a consequence of those tragic events.
        Quote: Banshee
        And then there will be a dozen of Shirokino, fleeing non-fired militias who came to the army for rations and wages, and shouts "Russia, help me out."

        Calm down, reader! The author exaggerates Yes . Apparently, in order to develop hatred-inspirational sentiments among the ukronazists laughing

        "News from the fields" says that the military construction in the republic is going well.
        District military registration and enlistment offices began to train the so-called "partisans" from among the volunteers-reserve officers (remember the Soviet period), and this is being done en masse, on a grand scale.

        "Buhi and Bahi" at all polygons, almost every day.

        We wish, friends, the author of greater observation and the same, more attentive and competent sources "there".
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      4 March 2016 10: 33
      And I do not PR anyone, if that. But it is difficult for a representative of the above category to understand.

      Zadral - do not read. We have a kind of democracy and freedom of speech.
      1. Mobius
        0
        4 March 2016 15: 04
        Literally "fallen underfoot" article from the resource Military materials, prompted to return to the topic terribly described by the author Shirokino ...

        The APU group near Shirokino is doomed to destruction
        March 4 2016

        Attention! Information taken from the Ukrainian site! Be carefull!(clarification of military materials)

        http://warfiles.ru/show-110691-gruppirovka-vsu-pod-shirokino-obrechena-na-unicht

        ozhenie.html
  5. +5
    4 March 2016 07: 33
    Oh guys. Who there just did not profit. There, such gangs were disguised as militias. You can take everyone there by the tail. And the dead guys have nothing to drag. Those who came to fight were at war. Those who came to receive dividends climbed into the commanders. Who remembers Trump. Trump started from scratch in Shakhtersk. He was the commander of the 7 brigade, then he was moved to the post of deputy, sending Sedogo from Donetsk. And then he himself filed a report for dismissal. And who will discuss what of the two battalions of the brigade left to platoon. And here is an important topic. Squeezed out or not squeezed Khodorkovsky gas station.
    1. +1
      4 March 2016 11: 30
      Quote: black
      You can take everyone there by the tail.

      who will take something?)
  6. Riv
    +5
    4 March 2016 07: 46
    I already said once that the Donbass passed confidently, if we take the October Revolution as an analogy, the period of the revolutionary mess of the early 20s and is moving steadily towards the sweeps of the 30s. Well, yes, there’s what and whom to clean. Shit, as you know, swims and the upper layer of political water will have to be drained in any way.
    This is natural and inevitable. Meanwhile, the rest of Ukraine, by the same analogy, was firmly stuck in the 18th year.
  7. +5
    4 March 2016 08: 07
    About the fact that the Khodakovsky man of Akhmetov says Boris Rozhin. And I somehow trust him more.
    1. +1
      4 March 2016 09: 31
      I wonder how many times Boris traveled to the Donbass. With all due respect to him.
      1. 0
        4 March 2016 11: 23
        Quote: Stauffenberg
        I wonder how many times Boris traveled to the Donbass. With all due respect to him.
        Well, that went, that's for sure, spread the photo reports on the blog. How much I find it difficult to say is it important at all?
        1. +1
          4 March 2016 14: 39
          In my opinion did not go. But not the point. Roman traveled to Donbass more than once or twice. Not like a tourist. He risked his life, so his opinion is more valuable to me personally. Although I respect Boris for his works and propaganda. He recently hacked to death with Khodokovsky. He even invited him to visit .-)))
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +4
      4 March 2016 10: 33
      It looks like "Nikolay71" is right. At the very beginning of the Donetsk mess, Kurginyan said that they need to involve big businessmen in supporting the liberation movement. Remember? And then he himself went to see Khodakovsky and told the world that there was a Buk. There is a lot of turbidity in this whole story.
  8. +14
    4 March 2016 08: 07
    Unfortunately, this is the way life is in Russia.
    Colonel Kvachkov, who devoted his whole life to serving the Motherland, languishes in prison.
    Some leaders of the militia of New Russia, who understood what was happening, voluntarily resigned, others were removed with the help of territorial acts. Those who brewed this porridge clear their way to power.
    1. -3
      4 March 2016 10: 32
      Well, bo. Germany or Luxembourg were in charge of LDNR; it would be different; it supervises the Russian Federation - it is, as it is, it cannot be otherwise
  9. +5
    4 March 2016 09: 30
    "That's so beautiful. Who else wants to become people's republics? Surkov is like midas on the contrary. What does not touch - everything turns into d ... mo
  10. +6
    4 March 2016 09: 31
    However. It is difficult to say something specific without having all the pictures of events. You guys are scavengers, and not too early you started to get junk, do you have it all ended? Not too early to share the skin?
    All objects that are capable of generating profit and, for whatever reason, have lost the operational management of the owners for the period of the outbreak of hostilities and to this day should be taken into account and capitalized (temporarily, before a special order), and taken to the balance of the Donetsk Republic with the distribution of profit to the budget DNR. All transactions with the above property, completed during the specified period, legal or illegal to be considered conditional and to postpone their implementation for an indefinite period, until the final resolution of the issue of the legal status of the DPR.
    Let it be for now. I understand that lawyers have a lot of work to do here, but if you don’t give all the grabbers hands, regardless of their positions, then people died.
    1. +7
      4 March 2016 09: 55
      Quote: Ros 56

      Let it be for now. I understand that lawyers have a lot of work to do here, but if you don’t give all the grabbers hands, regardless of their positions, then people died.

      I absolutely agree with you. But here's one of the comments about recent events: "
      ..., in the same video Smirnov says that the guys were "detained" on the street. But the main thing is that the guys from Troy are not on the video, and they were in these houses four days ago.
      Here the meaning is different. There is constant information about the offensive of the Jewish-Bandera hordes in Donetsk, but in reality, local thieves from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Security Council organized PMCs and are engaged in shooting people who are not part of their system. Moreover, the situation on the side of the ukrovs is identical, those who expropriate the property of prosecutors, judges and other thieves are also killed there. Between themselves, the "armies" consisting of former and current Interior Ministry officers and security officers do not fight, engaging exclusively in the security functions of their geshefts, but push mobilized fools from Ukraine and former miners together, like guys from Troy, and in case of disobedience, they clean up. And they are trying to convince us that these are sacred holivars.)
      Something like that.
  11. -2
    4 March 2016 09: 32
    Mr. Skomorokhov, an ardent supporter of Purgin !!! I got with a pile of writings, where do you live that you are so aware of the events of the DPR?
    1. +1
      4 March 2016 10: 10
      If you, sir, do not know "where the author lives" and what he does, then first make inquiries, and only then rush with words. Your comments are highly emotional, but meaningless.
      Sadness.
    2. +4
      4 March 2016 10: 39
      Quote: Vladimir B
      Mr. Skomorokhov is an ardent supporter of Purgin !!!


      Wow! Yah? Where is the evidence? Voloki, dear, in the studio!

      Quote: Vladimir B
      ! I got with a pile of writings


      And I will get it. Unlike some, who can only jump and jump, I am not the only one in my head. And I can not only look at tomorrow. I can, however, throw advice: do not like it - have done it yourself. There is no need to shout like that.

      Quote: Vladimir B
      where do you live so aware of the events of the DNI?


      I live somewhere, but what? Do you want tea? I can throw the address, it's not difficult for me to meet.
      1. +10
        4 March 2016 11: 26
        Roman don't pay attention to the "gifted". Who is not indifferent to the fate of Novorossiya keeps an eye on what is happening there. The information from you, as from a practically participant in the events, who knows the local "cuisine" firsthand, is extremely interesting. Unfortunately, we can only observe. It is sad to see how dreams are crumbling for a better life for the Russians of Donbass.
        And the guys who were dying there for their ideals eventually gave their lives for the banal redistribution of a sample of Russia in the early 90's.
        It is impossible to place:
        ... It seemed: the goals are the best in the world:
        "Freedom, brotherhood, equality of labor!"
        But all the heroes are simple, like children,
        And this is their great misfortune ...
        E. Asadov "Russia"
        I thought that Novorossia would show by its example in which direction large Russia should move. But no, it is not destined to be fulfilled by these desires. We wanted the best, it turned out as always. We can regret it further LIVE, and many guys, alas, are deprived of this ...
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +6
      4 March 2016 10: 41
      The novel really did a lot for the LDNR. So don't "la-la". He has his own point of view on what is happening and it has the right to be like a specific participant in the events. hi
      1. +2
        4 March 2016 11: 21
        Quote: siberalt
        The novel really did a lot for the LDNR. So don't "la-la". He has his own point of view on what is happening and it has the right to be like a specific participant in the events. hi

        I agree. He is almost the only one who is trying to maintain the audience's elusive interest in Donbass. Only it seems that the term "leaked" is inappropriate. Self-draining. The event horizon is not clear. The scale of what is happening is negligible. The layman has other events in trend.
  12. +2
    4 March 2016 11: 26
    I don’t understand one thing - the same Kononov and Zakharchenko, the same old militia commanders as Khodakovsky - how is he fundamentally older there? Not in defense of the former, simply to the point. Shooters in general, the most legendary in this regard was, so there has been one negative in his direction recently in articles.
    1. 0
      5 March 2016 01: 44
      Sorry, but how was it legendary? What did Musin through his agency do?
  13. +2
    4 March 2016 11: 35
    The author, Roman Skomorokhov, is a good person. sincerely worried about his native land, about the events that one has to observe. But there is one point, these are people. People living there. With its history of "state" Ukrainian. How are they different from those behind the front lines? Logic? Values? Moral foundations? Or do they know how differently than in Kiev, to comply with laws and take care of citizens? Decent children of their people live there, and by and large it is not their fault that they are like that. It's just that Ukraine was frozen in the 90s. and the future never came there. So they don't know how it is otherwise ...
  14. +2
    4 March 2016 11: 45
    For a long time we figured out with Khodakovsky that he was not a supporter of New Russia, that he had a lot of dark affairs and the death of militias, that he was just Akhmetov’s protege, watching over his good.
    Therefore, it will never be removed, like Bezler, etc.
  15. +1
    4 March 2016 12: 09
    But you must agree that this is all strange, this series of elimination of authoritative militia commanders. Where did Bezler and Bolotov go? Some kind of dark and dirty movement is going on there. Probably not in vain at one time Strelkov left there with the words that if he does not leave today, then tomorrow they will simply be killed by some steers, they did not kill him physically, they began to kill him morally, destroying his reputation by spitting out tons of dirt, stipulating everything ... Yes, here in Russia a member of the patriotic movement "January 25" was arrested. As if there is a cleansing of the Russian patriotic field. Very strange...
    1. 0
      4 March 2016 14: 30
      Well, for example, because the movement on January 25 only formalized the OPPOSITION structure that, according to all data, existed at the time of entry into Slavyansk. Gentlemen, the opposition tried to arrange their anti-Crimea, most likely the ears of the State Department still stick behind them. As a result, gentlemen, the opposition successfully merged, putting the Russian Federation and the people of Donbass, who believed them in a worthless situation. After that, Russia made a revolution in the Donbas, essentially making an offer to Mr. Girkin that cannot be refused - to blame Donbas or .... The Russian governors, Zakharchenko and Plotnitsky, were delivered BY THE ESSENCE. APU boldly with the north wind, and Pete Poroshenko was asked to think whether he wants to continue in the same vein. Considering that the northerners had already taken 2 np in the Zaporozhye region, and all the troops did not have any troops left to the border with the Crimea, Petya sharply became a dove of peace and agreed to Minsk 1.
      I ask you not to compare the Russian patriotic field and the pseudo-patriotic opposition from the Nazis, Limonovites and different Girkins. To make it clear, I’ll explain even easier. Mr. Girkin is an enemy of the current Russian government, and so while he only scratches his tongue they do not touch him. If he begins to carry out subversive work, then they will be engaged in it. Although, in my opinion, the opposition and the United States are preparing him for the honorary position of a sacrificial goat, so as to shout over his carcass that a bloody gebna killed a patriot. Proven course in many countries.
      1. 0
        4 March 2016 15: 33
        Quote: g1v2
        I ask you not to compare the Russian patriotic field and the pseudo-patriotic opposition from the Nazis, Limonovites and different Girkins.
        What kind of Russian patriotic field ??? who is that ?? wassat
      2. 0
        5 March 2016 13: 16
        In my opinion, now on Ukroin any opposition political activity is called subversive and organized by the Russian special services. A direct analogy is obtained. You are not with the "Censor" case, the techniques are just the same))) suspiciously like that ...
  16. +7
    4 March 2016 12: 22
    The author has not forgotten the tough command during the first assault on the airport, when the Ukrainians occupied it? Didn't Khodakovsky and Sysenko "negotiate" with the Ukrainians? And how, under the valiant command of Khodakovsky, did they smash their own Kamaz trucks with the Chechens, who were evacuated from the airport? After such a "spetsnaz" soldier had to put a bullet in his forehead, and not sit in the General Staff.
    About the capture of the nursery. Listen, Zakhar now has in his hands factories, mines, a piece of iron, will he become so dirty? And there are daki everywhere. I drive an ax in the car, because hell knows what will get out of the BMW that cut you on the road. So the author is clearly angry with disorder throughout the world.
  17. 0
    4 March 2016 13: 00
    "A thief stole a club from a thief."
  18. 0
    4 March 2016 14: 10
    Yes, we all wake up as after a dream. The scenario of the beginning of the last century of Russia is repeated. It seems that not much time has passed, but it is repeated only in the modern version. It is easier to relate to this, it is easier.
  19. +1
    4 March 2016 18: 00
    I believe that in Novorossia it is really not so simple!
    However, what did we expect and in the end what do we all want?
    The fact is that the people did not rise to the struggle on their own, but under the influence, as they say, of the Passionaries. We saw how hefty boogee refugees from the Donbass and Lugansk regions were hiding under the woman’s skirts on the Russian border. And such, honestly recognize the majority.
    But who are these same passionaries? Who called the people from the very beginning to fight for the Russian spring? And such as Strelkov and his associates. Is he bad as a politician, or others did not correspond to the "high rank" of the people's leaders, this is another question. They stood up to defend Russian self-awareness. But we must admit: from the beginning of the struggle, most of the heroes were ... not local or had lived for a long time in other regions - Kiev, Crimea, Odessa, etc.
    They are of course heroes, but also a bit of romance. An idea drove them.
    But in the process of struggle, local cadres were also involved. And here the first shoots of today's confrontation appeared. Yes, they also showed miracles of courage and selflessness ... But! Moreover, they well knew what and where it was and how much it cost.
    Of course, in the struggle for a just cause, various means can be used. Including squeezed, confiscated, captured from the enemy.
    But there was some kind of lull and it turned out that the captured must somehow not be given away, but it should work for the common good.
    But this is the good thing, according to different opinions, everyone turned out to be different.
    What the leaders of New Russia are going to build: socialism - then it really needs to be nationalized and managed publicly, capitalism - then return all the confiscated. There are still options, but these are all variations of these two main goals.
    Honestly, many Novorossia politicians look at both Russia and Ukraine. I can say it can be very harsh (God forbid, I’m wrong), but the current policy of local leaders ranges from future benefits: there will be benefits from Ukraine - there will be fraternities with Ukraine, from Russia - then they are with Russia.
    In short - this is not the Russian spring.
    This is a search for benefits.
    Maybe this is practical and logical ... but not for Russian romanticism.
    Earlier, Roman Skomorokhov noticed that communication with some of the commanders of the formations was difficult. For all their heroism, they were, as they say in Ukraine, kurkuli. You can’t say about them: the knights without fear and reproach. Without fear - yes, but not without benefits!
    Maybe that’s right. But something is really a pity ... It is a pity that not all of them are Strelkovs, with him there may be naivety, but also a terrible desire for justice.
    In the coming months, I think a lot will become clear.
    And I would take the time to glorify and celebrate one Oda, and sharply criticize others.
    We cannot intervene, and the course of history brought to the surface very different people. And now they are fighting each other. Including terrible methods.
  20. +5
    4 March 2016 18: 30
    I read about the events in LDNR, there is only bitterness and pain in my heart.
    They also write leaked Donbass-not leaked.
    Yes, they merged, even as they merged, they simply scattered everything, ditching many people, ditching the edge and there is no end-edge to this.
    For what and against what people rose in the Donbass: for their land, against the Bandera fascist traitors.
    Why volunteers went to Donbass to help Donbass defend their land.
    Which of the plans came true? NOTHING. Everything has been turned into a business project, spin-offs, destruction, and the expectation of a future infusion of cash. Only people continue to die.
    Judging by conscience, both the junta and its patrons and curators deserve criminal punishment.
    The curators had to stop the bloodshed and for this they had opportunities: the legitimate president of Ukraine, the incompetent Ukrainian army, who did not want to fight either with the people or with Russia. And the main people of Donbass are our Russian people, with the Russian language and customs, vitally connected with Russia, both history and family ties, economically connected. Opportunities were not properly used, all the business-to-mutual partners nullified. They were the source of the spin and redistribution, which led the policy of curators.
    Here are Internet statements about the attitude to "Rashka" are not taken seriously, the family is not without its black sheep, morons are present in any society, they do not count.
    I am ashamed of the inhabitants of Donbass, many of whom have not waited for help, and how many will not wait: no one is going to stop the bloodshed.
    The Minsk agreements do not stop the blood and return the dead - they are just paper that no one is going to execute, and indeed no one reads: there is no other way to explain.
  21. +1
    4 March 2016 19: 10
    After the battle, the looters reap the benefits ...
  22. 0
    4 March 2016 20: 46
    ... Khodakovsky. Is he good or bad
    - this is a matter of personal opinion of everyone, and opinion
    consists of the information received.
    Accordingly, whom you read / watch, these are the conclusions.

    Only from what Khodakovsky himself said, he concluded that he was a "sent Cossack", a guardian for "edanu urkainu", and his "military successes" speak for themselves.
  23. 0
    4 March 2016 22: 00
    Recently, it seems that we are witnessing the last act of some kind of tragicomedy. The point is not even that in Donetsk they somehow suddenly took up arms against Khodakovsky. Whether he is good or bad is a matter of personal opinion of everyone, and an opinion is made up of the information received. Accordingly, who you read / watch, these are the conclusions. I won’t draw any conclusions and talk about Khodokovsky’s ties with Akhmetov’s, but I could only say that the question was about the self-sufficiency of the republics, and this is connected with the working enterprises of Akhmetov’s, which in turn still pay taxes to Kiev and about their nationalization, suddenly Hero Khodakovsky so correct and so the only one left !! strange isn't it?
    1. 0
      5 March 2016 12: 40
      True, Mikhail - we look who has Khodakovsky's bustle (whose junk guarded zealously), remember how this Akhmetovsky lackey voted that Bandera’s squeezed like rats at the airport, according to the laws of officer honor (I don’t remember exactly what he argued for, scrap the record look with this henchman) to deliver humanitarian assistance (products, etc.).
      I am surprised by this attempt by Roman to "objectively" deal with this lame duck, why suddenly :-(
  24. 0
    5 March 2016 13: 00
    Gentlemen, the opposition tried to arrange their anti-Crimea, most likely the ears of the State Department still stick behind them.

    What does "anti-Crimea" mean? What are these judgments based on? Moreover, even without argumentation. By this, by the way, you are already likening the statements of that very State Department, they often sin with this.
    But it is not a secret for anyone that there is such a "liberal layer" in Russia, initially interested in the "drain" of the "Russian spring" in the Donbass. Apparently, the sanctions that hit the pocket of this very "liberal stratum" played a role.
    And yet, if there was no "Slavyansk" then there would be neither the DPR nor the LPR, as in Kharkov half of the dissenters would be killed, half would be jailed.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"