Military Review

Fleet of naval aviation of the Black Sea Fleet will be fully updated to 2020 g

63
The fleet MA of the Black Sea Fleet should be fully upgraded to 2020 g, in particular, the A-12 and Su-24CM airplanes will replace the amphibious aircraft Be-40 and the Su-30 bombers. RIA News message of the chief of the Marine aviation Black Sea Fleet Gennady Zagonov.




"Amphibious aircraft Be-12 will be replaced by modern anti-submarine aircraft A-40 to 2020 year."

Also, according to him, “there will be a complete replacement of Su-24 bombers with multipurpose Su-30CM fighters, which are capable of striking both ground and sea targets.”

"A serious modernization awaits the fleet of anti-submarine helicopters," added Zagonov.

Help Agency: “The multi-purpose amphibian A-40" Albatross "(Be-42, product" B ", according to NATO codification - Mermaid) - the Soviet multi-purpose amphibian plane, planned to replace the Be-12. The project was stopped after the collapse of the Soviet Union, subsequently repeatedly announced the resumption of production.

Double Su-30CM multi-purpose fighter combines the functions of a fighter, attack aircraft and bomber. It has super-maneuverability, is equipped with a radar with a phased antenna array, engines with thrust vectoring controlled and front horizontal tail. An airplane can strike air targets with equal effectiveness, and can hit ground and surface objects. ”


Fleet of naval aviation of the Black Sea Fleet will be fully updated to 2020 g
Photos used:
www.navy.su/aviation/airplanes-after1945/, RIA Novosti. Vladimir Astapkovich
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Inok10
    Inok10 3 March 2016 16: 14
    22
    ... Good news ... I'm especially happy for the A-40 Albatross ... hi
    1. Michael67
      Michael67 3 March 2016 16: 17
      11
      Good news. Only the timing would be pushed ... So that the article was called "The Black Sea Fleet Marine Aviation Park will be fully updated by 2018".
      1. Temples
        Temples 3 March 2016 16: 21
        17
        Good news. Only the deadlines would push ... So that the article is called ...

        In this case, the news should read like this:
        - Yesterday the Fleet of the Black Sea Fleet was completely updated. laughing

        It is important that they think in this direction.
        The main thing is to set a specific task.
        Our people are hardworking.
        We can handle it.
        1. cniza
          cniza 3 March 2016 16: 41
          +6
          The fleet of the Black Sea Fleet should be completely renewed by 2020, in particular, Be-12 amphibious aircraft and Su-24 bombers will be replaced by A-40 and Su-30SM aircraft,


          We recorded everything, try not to do it, just don’t stop ... success.
          1. PKK
            PKK 3 March 2016 16: 54
            0
            We can’t postpone the Turks until 20 years. In the background, the boat goes. And the amphibians are probably envious.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. dmi.pris
          dmi.pris 3 March 2016 16: 45
          0
          The people are hardworking .. Yes, the rulers have exorbitant appetites, irrepressible in the current situation, it can work out as with new ships and "Barguzin".
          Quote: Temples
          Good news. Only the deadlines would push ... So that the article is called ...

          In this case, the news should read like this:
          - Yesterday the Fleet of the Black Sea Fleet was completely updated. laughing

          It is important that they think in this direction.
          The main thing is to set a specific task.
          Our people are hardworking.
          We can handle it.
          1. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 3 March 2016 17: 45
            -2
            Quote: dmi.pris
            .Yes rulers appetites exorbitant, indefatigable

            And we all sin on the Old Man - they say he is trying to sit on two chairs. Ours then on three sofas swaggered ...
        4. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 3 March 2016 17: 42
          0
          Quote: Temples
          Yesterday, the Black Sea Fleet Aviation Park was completely updated.

          Well, yes, yes ...
          A-40 “Albatross” (Be-42, product “B”, according to NATO codification: Mermaid) is a Soviet multi-purpose amphibious aircraft. It was planned to replace the Be-12. Created by Taganrog aircraft manufacturers headed by chief designer A.K. Konstantinov (TANTK named after G.M.Beriev) 8 декабря 1986 года
      2. Kent0001
        Kent0001 3 March 2016 16: 36
        +3
        Everything is possible. I think everything that is there is now in flight condition and is ready to fulfill its tasks.
      3. Homo
        Homo 3 March 2016 16: 50
        +5
        Quote: Michael67
        Good news. Only the timing would be pushed ... So that the article was called "The Black Sea Fleet Marine Aviation Park will be fully updated by 2018".

        Why shake the air with empty comments? Now all the heroes "I want everything to be yesterday"! And for example, I would like that many years ago there were articles with the titles "All the people of the USSR, as one came out to defend unity", "All the conscious population rose up against the State Emergency Committee", "We will not allow the Belovezhsky agreement"! However, everyone sat in their holes, at best they were silent in a rag, and at worst they walked around with posters "give the market, democracy, sausage." Those who said that we would fall into poverty, collapse, degradation, were mixed with mud. And now all the "Wishlist" have grown! hi
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 3 March 2016 17: 09
          +2
          Quote: Homo
          And for example, I would like that many years ago there were articles with the titles "All the people of the USSR, as one came out to defend unity", "All the conscious population rose up against the State Emergency Committee", "We will not allow the Belovezhsky agreement"!

          Yeah ... "Citizens of the USSR demand the maintenance of the Union!","We made our choice on March 17!","All in one against the false communist separatists!". sad
        2. SUFER
          SUFER 3 March 2016 17: 28
          0
          Excuse me, did you come to the defense of the USSR? They rebelled against the Bialowieza conspiracy, the shooting of parliament in 1993, or are you doing something now to restore the RSFSR?
          1. serezhasoldatow
            serezhasoldatow 3 March 2016 17: 39
            0
            There have been attempts in Sevastopol and Crimea, but those in power quickly ...
          2. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 3 March 2016 17: 47
            +1
            Quote: SUFER
            Excuse me, did you come to the defense of the USSR?

            Excuse me, are you able to explain to your child the viciousness of the education system that is being pushed through the media?
            You yourself understand the harm of social networks, of which even IN?
          3. Homo
            Homo 7 March 2016 02: 00
            0
            Quote: SUFER
            Excuse me, did you come to the defense of the USSR? They rebelled against the Bialowieza conspiracy, the shooting of parliament in 1993, or are you doing something now to restore the RSFSR?

            If this is a question for me, then yes, it did. And he spoke on the regional TV. And now it is stupid to demand the restoration of the RSFSR. It is necessary not to restore, but to build something new, without "democracy" and "market".
    2. Altona
      Altona 3 March 2016 16: 20
      +2
      Quote: Inok10
      ... Good news ... I'm especially happy for the A-40 Albatross ..

      -------------------
      And I'm for the Su-30SM, the best is the enemy of the good, we must go forward ...
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 3 March 2016 16: 22
      +4
      If so. I'm glad for the albatross.
      25 years went to the conveyor, but for 25 years in the world nothing was better invented
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 3 March 2016 17: 17
        0
        Quote: Denis Obukhov
        If so. I'm glad for the albatross.
        25 years went to the conveyor, but for 25 years in the world nothing was better invented

        This is suspicious. smile It is very simple to be the first in the direction recognized by the others as unpromising.
        Why does a PLO plane need landing on water? And what have we sacrificed for the sake of achieving amphibianity compared to a conventional civilian-based PLO machine?
        1. serezhasoldatow
          serezhasoldatow 3 March 2016 17: 42
          0
          But the BE-12 did not land on the water and did not take off from the water? It was not created as a civilian.
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 3 March 2016 18: 49
            +1
            Quote: serezhasoldatow
            But the BE-12 did not land on the water and did not take off from the water? It was not created as a civilian.

            Be-12 is a swan song of the Soviet hydroaviation. PLO aircraft developed in the late 50s. After him went the traditional IL-38 and Tu-142.

            ICH, IL-38 is still in service and, moreover, is actively being modernized. But the Be-12 remained only in the museum fleet - the Black Sea Fleet - for the sole reason: while Crimea was Ukrainian, we did not have the right to re-equip the Crimean Air Force units based in Crimea without agreement with the Ukrainian side. For the same reason, the oldest Su-24 models were preserved in Crimea.
        2. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 3 March 2016 17: 51
          0
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Why does a PLO plane need landing on water? And what have we sacrificed for the sake of achieving amphibianity compared to a conventional civilian-based PLO machine?

          Why talk in riddles - let's in a more understandable language. hi
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 3 March 2016 18: 58
            +2
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Why talk in riddles - let's in a more understandable language.

            In a more understandable language: how many kilograms of payload / fuel reserve we lost to fulfill the requirements for landing on water (aerodynamics, a reinforced bottom - especially taking into account the presence of an arms compartment, sealing, equipment for working on the water, corrosion protection, etc. )?

            And if we really needed a medium-range PLO plane, wasn’t it easier to make it, say, from a Tu-204?
            1. Ingvar 72
              Ingvar 72 3 March 2016 20: 04
              +1
              Quote: Alexey RA
              wouldn't it be easier to make it, say, from a Tu-204?

              Amphibiousness in the Tu-204 is absent. And on open spaces of the ocean it is a huge plus. request
              1. Alexey RA
                Alexey RA 4 March 2016 10: 22
                +2
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Amphibiousness in the Tu-204 is absent. And on open spaces of the ocean it is a huge plus.

                Yeah ... that's just nobody except us knows about this plus, for some reason. smile
                They build themselves oceanic Orions, Poseidons and Kawasaki P-1s that land on water 2 times - first and last.

                Even the Japanese, with their PS-1 / US-1A station wagon of the 60s, eventually abandoned the anti-submarine variant and continued to modernize and purchase this seaplane only in the US-2 patrol rescue variant. And as the aircraft, the PLO was in no way chosen hydro, but the usual P-1.
            2. Inok10
              Inok10 3 March 2016 21: 29
              +4
              Quote: Alexey RA
              In a more understandable language: how many kilograms of payload / fuel reserve we lost to fulfill the requirements for landing on water (aerodynamics, a reinforced bottom - especially taking into account the presence of an arms compartment, sealing, equipment for working on the water, corrosion protection, etc. )?

              . not how much! .
              TU-204
              empty weight - 58300 kg. (excluding the MSS system "Sea Serpent / Novella)
              A-40
              empty weight - 44000 kg. (taking into account the MSS system "Sea Kite / Novella) wins with a margin of 14300 kg.
              ... Further ...
              TU-204
              the weight of domestic fuel is 21000 kg.
              A-40
              the weight of domestic fuel is 36000 kg. wins with a margin of 15000 kg.
              Quote: Alexey RA
              And if we really needed a medium-range PLO plane, wasn’t it easier to make it, say, from a Tu-204?

              ... from the above, we do not need an aircraft based on the TU-204 as a PLO! ... hi
              1. Alexey RA
                Alexey RA 4 March 2016 10: 35
                0
                Quote: Inok10
                TU-204
                the weight of domestic fuel is 21000 kg.
                A-40
                the weight of domestic fuel is 36000 kg. wins with a margin of 15000 kg.

                Ahem ... actually, 21 kg is business load basic civilian Tu-204. In the Tu-204SM, it was brought up to 23 kg.
                And the fuel mass of the Tu-204 is from 32 to 800 kg.

                In general, the picture looks like this:
                A-40:
                empty weight - 44 tons, maximum take-off weight - 90 tons
                Tu-204SM:
                empty weight - 58 tons, maximum take-off weight - 108 tons

                Oh yes, let's compare the ranges:
                A-40: Practical range 4000 km
                Tu-204SM: range at maximum load: 4200 km
                http://www.tupolev.ru/tu-204sm

                And the Tu-204 engines are 2 times smaller - he does not need to carry 2 take-off engines with him.
                1. Inok10
                  Inok10 5 March 2016 00: 24
                  +2
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  In the Tu-204SM, it was brought up to 23 kg.
                  And the fuel mass of the Tu-204 is from 32 to 800 kg.

                  ... the board received the certificate in 2013 ... well, even so ...
                  - air refueling system - absent
                  - PPP - "Sea Serpent / Novella - absent
                  - EW / REP - none
                  - combat compartment for weapons - missing
                  - All of the above already requires glider reinforcement ... hi
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  Oh yes, let's compare the ranges:
                  A-40: practical range of 4000 km
                  Tu-204SM: range at maximum load: 4200 km

                  ... well, you are completely in vain ... who will put on the A-40 "Pensioners" D-30TKPV ... PS-90A-42 are already ready there since 2010 ... you can safely add 20% to the practical range - 800 km. ... total = 4800 km.
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  And the Tu-204 engines are 2 times smaller - he does not need to carry 2 take-off engines with him.

                  ... MDA ... this burden does not pull unambiguously, only plus from it is 2 RD-60K x 279 kg. = 558 kg. but they are already in a mass of 44 kg. common ... for that:
                  - A-40 strip 1000 m. Land / 2000 m. Water up to 5 points of excitement (wave up to 2 meters)
                  - TU-204 strip 1800 m. ... no less, only land, concrete ... generally without words ... hi
        3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Starik72
      Starik72 3 March 2016 16: 30
      +3
      Inok10 completely agree with you! If only they would equip quickly, not only the Black Sea Fleet, and not only military A-40s, but also civilian amphibians B-200 for the Ministry of Emergencies!
      1. Inok10
        Inok10 3 March 2016 16: 55
        +3
        Quote: Starik72
        If only they would quickly equip, and not only the Black Sea Fleet

        ... A-40 and there will be enough work in the Baltic, Germany, Denmark, Sweden are not the most backward in submarines ... it is not in vain that delegations in uniform and without have been frequenting the "Kos" in the last 2 years ... hi
      2. GSH-18
        GSH-18 3 March 2016 17: 21
        0
        Quote: Starik72
        Inok10 completely agree with you! If only they would equip quickly, not only the Black Sea Fleet, and not only military A-40s, but also civilian amphibians B-200 for the Ministry of Emergencies!

        The Black Sea Navy of the Russian Federation is on the spearhead, so to speak. Therefore, realizing the unprecedented importance of the Black Sea Fleet, it is urgently re-equipped in full. And the rest will come, but then.
        1. gispanec
          gispanec 3 March 2016 18: 21
          0
          Quote: GSH-18
          And the rest will come, but then.

          THIS before the Pacific Fleet then? .. Well, tell it to the Far East
    5. GSH-18
      GSH-18 3 March 2016 16: 56
      0
      Fleet of naval aviation of the Black Sea Fleet will be fully updated to 2020 g

      Just really good! We would still have a T-50 with a dozen to threaten the asman good
      And the rest of the tinnitus shelloponi.
    6. Alex_59
      Alex_59 3 March 2016 18: 42
      0
      Quote: Inok10
      especially happy for the A-40 Albatross ...

      But I'm not very. A-40 is not a very economical aircraft, its size is excessive for the Black Sea, and seaworthiness as amphibians is unlikely to be in demand. It is better to make a near-field patrolman from Il-114 or the like, and a distant one from Tu-204 or even from MS-21.
      About Su-30 - wonderful without question.
      1. Inok10
        Inok10 3 March 2016 21: 44
        +2
        Quote: Alex_59
        But I'm not very. A-40 is not a very economical aircraft, for the Black Sea its dimension is excessive, and seaworthiness as amphibians is unlikely to be in demand.

        ... efficiency, these are engines ... for the A-40 since 2010 there is a PS-90A-42 unified with a PS-90A-76 ... hi
        Quote: Alex_59
        It is better to make a near-field patrol officer from Il-114 or similar, and a distant one from Tu-204 or even from MS-21.

        ... and why the near zone ?! ... the Black Sea Fleet also falls into the area of ​​responsibility of the Mediterranean Sea ... and, for the A-40, even with the "pensioners" D-30TKPV, the maximum practical range was 5500 km., 12 hours in the airand with the PS-90A-42 you can safely throw another 20% to the range ... about the TU-204 answered above ... hi
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 4 March 2016 10: 39
          0
          Quote: Inok10
          ... but why the near zone ?! ... the Mediterranean Sea also falls into the zone of responsibility of the Black Sea Fleet ...

          How will you fly to the Mediterranean? As usual - through Iran, Iraq and Syria? smile
        2. Alex_59
          Alex_59 4 March 2016 12: 38
          0
          Quote: Inok10
          profitability, these are engines

          No, dear, profitability, these are not only engines, but also Cx, Su and the aerodynamic quality of K. And with this, devices with boat forms of the fuselage have insurmountable difficulties. Well and some more points with spurious scales. And excess weight is the angle of attack and excess wing resistance. Therefore, not a single amphibian has yet been built in the world, which is more economical than an ordinary aircraft of similar sizes and masses.
  2. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 3 March 2016 16: 14
    +2
    News for "partners". Especially for those who want to test the strength of the southern borders of the Russian Federation.
  3. chikenous59
    chikenous59 3 March 2016 16: 14
    +2
    Sorry, off topic, but:
    BEIRUT, March 3. / Corr. TASS Dmitry Zelenin. The Syrian Ministry of Electricity announced an unexpected interruption in energy supply to all provinces in the country.
    This was reported by the news agency SANA.


    More on TASS:
    http://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/2715156
    1. PKK
      PKK 3 March 2016 16: 56
      -1
      Not on the topic. I think the light was cut down in Syria so that the bearded ones could charge the batteries.
  4. Magic archer
    Magic archer 3 March 2016 16: 16
    +3
    And why is Su-24СМ used instead of Su-30? After all, the twenty-four changer is Su-34! Strange ... By the way, odnoforumchane, no one knows, the EW plane is not planned on the basis of Su-34? Full-fledged, like Su-24PP. Analog American Wild Hound.
    1. Inok10
      Inok10 3 March 2016 16: 23
      +3
      Quote: Magic Archer
      And why is Su-24СМ used instead of Su-30? After all, the twenty-four changer is Su-34! Strange ... By the way, odnoforumchane, no one knows, the EW plane is not planned on the basis of Su-34? Full-fledged, like Su-24PP. Analog American Wild Hound.

      ... last year ...
      “The Ministry of Defense will receive the first batch of so-called stackable containers installed under the fuselage, which will make it possible to turn the standard Su-34 into a specialized electronic warfare aircraft that can protect not only itself, but also provide effective electronic suppression of radar systems and anti-aircraft missile systems, long-range radar aircraft patrol and so on - that is, the protection of other aircraft of the group, ”said I. Nasenkov. Source:http://www.arms-expo.ru/news/novye_razrabotki/kret_prevratit_su_34_v_samolet_reb
      _/
      ... while maintaining the function of a bomber ... hi
      1. Magic archer
        Magic archer 3 March 2016 16: 39
        0
        Thank you very much! As I understand it, we are talking about the Khibiny
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 3 March 2016 16: 48
          +3
          Quote: Magic Archer
          Thank you very much! As I understand it, we are talking about the Khibiny

          ... no, additional equipment expandable as necessary ... hi
  5. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 3 March 2016 16: 26
    +3
    The A-40 Albatross was supposed to have the D-27 Ukraine propeller-ventilator engines. If they are replaced at the moment?
    1. Inok10
      Inok10 3 March 2016 16: 39
      +6
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      The A-40 Albatross was supposed to have the D-27 Ukraine propeller-ventilator engines. If they are replaced at the moment?

      ... not quite so ... D-27 is a modernization project for A-40M ... standard 40 DTRD PNPP went A-2 Aircraft engine D-30TKPV + auxiliary 2 turbojet engines Klimov RD-60K ... these are Perm motors and Rybinsk ... hi
    2. AlexTires
      AlexTires 3 March 2016 16: 40
      +2
      main engines - D-30ТКПВ, sort of ...
    3. engineer74
      engineer74 3 March 2016 16: 44
      +3
      The D-27 has not yet become an engine (and, probably, will not become), while this is an insanely expensive set of designers' wishlist ... On the A-40, most likely, some kind of "specially trained" version of the PD-14 will be slapped - cheap and cheerful, plus unification!
      IMHO
  6. xam0
    xam0 3 March 2016 16: 32
    0
    It’s good that work on re-equipping our army is underway, albeit not always at the pace we wanted, but it is underway and some results are already visible. And the army today is already very different from the 90s-2000s army.
  7. Advesta
    Advesta 3 March 2016 16: 37
    +1
    The news is certainly good. But I doubt very much about the A-40. As far as I know, there is only one flying instance. And then it flies only to the air show in recent years. And there are no production capacities. TNTK Beriev is unlikely to master the production since the Be-200 is currently being made. And other plants have no competence. And even the A-40 is a large device because of this, there were sales problems. Better than the Be-200 for the needs of the fleet modified.
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 3 March 2016 16: 51
      +1
      Without the D-436, the Be-200 does not fly very well, here the non-brothers "bit" us. A-40 is no bigger than an Il-76, and there they make A-50/100! hi
    2. mmrr
      mmrr 3 March 2016 16: 51
      +2
      The dimensions do not allow the Be-200 to be a full-fledged anti-submarine aircraft. The A-40 was created for these purposes, especially since nothing better was invented in the world. Albatross is the best amphibian in the world.
    3. MaxGerb
      MaxGerb 3 March 2016 16: 55
      +2
      maybe it costs the opposite - how many Be-12 amphibians are in service now?
      And if there are "two" of them, then it is quite realizable.

      What is generally on the news - it pleases.
  8. n.kolesnichenko
    n.kolesnichenko 3 March 2016 16: 56
    0
    It is advisable to install the Be-200 instead of the Albatross, and the additional equipment will not become so expensive
    1. mmrr
      mmrr 3 March 2016 17: 04
      0
      Mal Be-200 for anti-submarine equipment and weapons. Be-200 was created for other purposes.
  9. Lazy ozzy
    Lazy ozzy 3 March 2016 16: 56
    +1
    So, first, the "warriors" abandon the Be-200 \ A-40, because it eats a lot of fuel and is generally whimsical and expensive to maintain. And now it will magically become usable?
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 3 March 2016 17: 21
      +1
      Quote: LazyOzzy
      So, first, the "warriors" abandon the Be-200 \ A-40, because it eats a lot of fuel and is generally whimsical and expensive to maintain. And now it will magically become usable?

      Well Duc ... who did the current Minister of Defense before? And who used to be the main customer for Beriev’s large seaplanes?
  10. FID
    FID 3 March 2016 17: 15
    +2
    Until 2020, how many years are left? How many aircraft can TNTK build?
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 3 March 2016 17: 19
      +2
      Maybe hurt what kind of detail is?
      And how many of their Black Sea Fleet are needed, maybe the truth is 1,5 -2 pieces?
      1. FID
        FID 3 March 2016 17: 41
        +2
        There are no backlogs at TNTK ... If you look at Google’s pictures, you can see another A-40 building near the sea ... I was at TNTK in 2013, they say that this building was put near the sea for life tests (for rust).
        1. engineer74
          engineer74 3 March 2016 18: 15
          0
          It is clear that "effective" managers (with zero concepts of production) have started up and now they will "launch" the "pipeline". I have already seen this: - we will hire someone, we will apply an advanced western business model, it will not work, and they will go to Moscow with a promotion.
          Unfortunately, discussing the news is pointless ...
          IMHO
      2. donavi49
        donavi49 3 March 2016 17: 57
        +4
        4-7 flight is now Be-12.

        The question is different, there is no side, that is, no tenders for a new boat are open. No orders are voiced either. Moreover, Beriev is trying to fend off the ships, he had to start the Be-2013 as early as the 200, and the entire contract period had already expired, that is, by now all 8 Be-200ES should be delivered!

        In fact, 0 has been completed, the most advanced "February 2016 - the assembly of the propulsion system modules (MDU) has begun.", The rest are even worse. And there are also boards for the Navy, where the embedded sections.

        For 4 of the year, there is no way to assemble A40 and equip it with the necessary complex. Not to mention, the fact that the complex needs to be created, worked out on the ground, worked out by plane.

        Most likely Be-12 when they write off, they will drive to replace IL-38Н, which poorly worked poorly and even put the stream on modernization. Moreover, autonomy and characteristics on the Black Sea are more than enough!
  11. Lazy ozzy
    Lazy ozzy 3 March 2016 17: 20
    +1
    Quote: Advesta
    The news is certainly good. But I doubt very much about the A-40. As far as I know, there is only one flying instance. And then it flies only to the air show in recent years. And there are no production capacities. TNTK Beriev is unlikely to master production since at the moment make the be-200. And other plants have no competence. And even the A-40 is a large device because of this, there were sales problems. Better than the Be-200 for the needs of the fleet modified.

    TNTK does not do a damn thing, after the transfer of documentation from Irkutsk to Taganrog in 2011, not a single machine was built. Only what is assembled in Irkutsk flies, 6 in the Russian Federation, 1 in Azerbaijan, 2 are "idle", 2 more were built "for scrap" for stat tests. 11 cars in 13 years. Hallelujah!
    1. Advesta
      Advesta 3 March 2016 19: 29
      0
      Here I am talking about too. TNTK is of little use. And literate specialists are not enough. Although there recently changed directors can get better. And the task of building 5-7 Albatrosses by 2020 is unrealistic. By 2030, yes, maybe it will probably be.
  12. Aandrewsir
    Aandrewsir 3 March 2016 17: 50
    0
    Correct solution. Hohloturtia needs to be "kept in check"!
  13. From Samara
    From Samara 3 March 2016 17: 52
    +1
    Su-30SM is good primarily as a fighter!
  14. dvg1959
    dvg1959 3 March 2016 19: 44
    0
    The dynamics is positive - it’s already terrible, in this direction it is necessary to strengthen our defense capability. But the results, I hope it will be possible to observe before 2020.