Military Review

DPRK launches short-range missiles in the direction of the Sea of ​​Japan

58
DPRK military launched several short-range missiles from the east coast of the republic towards the Sea of ​​Japan, reports RIA News message agency Yonhap.


DPRK launches short-range missiles in the direction of the Sea of ​​Japan
Archival photo.

"The launches were made around 10 in the morning local time (04.00 Moscow time, respectively) from an area near the town of Wonsan on the east coast of the DPRK," the report said.

The number of missiles released by the agency does not indicate.

Specialists "also did not rule out that the North Korean military could actually conduct artillery firing," the newspaper notes.

The representative of the Ministry of Defense of Kazakhstan, Mun Gyun, in turn, clarified that "all the missiles (shells) fired into the sea".

According to the agency, Pyongyang undertook these actions “a few hours after the UN Security Council approved the strictest package of sanctions against North Korea over the past 20 years after nuclear testing and rocket launch there.”

“The resolution prohibits the supply to the DPRK of aviation and rocket fuel; all cargo going to and from the DPRK will be subject to inspections. The document also bans the sale by the DPRK of all conventional weapons; significantly limits the export of coal, iron, gold, titanium and rare natural minerals from the country. It also introduces financial sanctions against the DPRK banks, "reminds RIA"News».
Photos used:
AP Photo / Ahn Young-joon
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Finches
    Finches 3 March 2016 08: 27
    +9
    Teasing the samurai for their hokkaido ...! laughing
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 3 March 2016 08: 31
      18
      Something I did not understand "experts" also did not rule out that the North Korean military could actually fire artillery pieces. " They can't tell a ballistic missile from an artillery shell?
      1. 79807420129
        79807420129 3 March 2016 08: 34
        13
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Something I did not understand "experts" also did not rule out that the North Korean military could actually fire artillery pieces. " They can't tell a ballistic missile from an artillery shell?

        Yes, when they determine whether the fighting hamster Eunu sneezes, in South Korea, diarrhea immediately opens.
        1. WKS
          WKS 3 March 2016 09: 54
          +3
          DPRK launches short-range missiles in the direction of the Sea of ​​Japan

          Where else can they launch rockets if not in the Sea of ​​Japan? Not to China or Russia? Another thing is interesting - how long will the North Korean regime last in conditions of such isolation?
          1. iConst
            iConst 3 March 2016 13: 14
            0
            Quote: wks
            Another thing is interesting - how long will the North Korean regime last in conditions of such isolation?

            What has changed? Something cardinal? laughing

            I don’t see anyone paying attention to
            after the UN Security Council approved the most stringent sanctions package against DPRK over the past 20 years
            - which means: Russia supported or abstained from this matter (well, too lazy to go to the UN website). smile
            1. Vladimir 23rus
              Vladimir 23rus 3 March 2016 18: 13
              +1
              The document also prohibits the sale of DPRK all conventional weapons; significantly limits the export from the country of coal, iron, gold, titanium and rare natural minerals. Financial sanctions are also imposed on DPRK banks. ”
              Russia supported this matter or abstained, China supported and "gave a standing ovation." Who will get it all now for a cheap price?
              1. Talgat
                Talgat 3 March 2016 19: 21
                +2
                Both China and Russia actually support the DPRK. If there hadn’t been China with Russia now, the DPRK would not have existed even a day

                Western media slandered the DPRK for not bowing their heads before dictatorship and aggression - they created a grotesque image of the Juche and "tyrant dictator" which is 100% false. They have everyone who did not lay down under the Federal Reserve System and defend independence - all are "axis of evil". The townsfolk are being zombified with supposedly simple "truths" - well, why resist! Give up! Lie under the world's bankers and live like Japan and Europe - in a "civilized" and "democratic" world. For this, "showcases" have been created at the points of confrontation - of course, the standard of living in the South Caucasus is probably better - but they are silent about the unrealistic sweatshop exploitation system in the South Caucasus - where people do not take vacations for years for fear of losing their jobs - where there is no confidence in tomorrow. And in the DPRK, despite the sanctions and the blockade - no one goes hungry like in Africa or in India or Brazil - and they are provided with medicine education, etc.

                They couldn’t bomb - they used the info weapon
                Unfortunately we all fell victim to this weapon.
      2. Misha Honest
        Misha Honest 3 March 2016 10: 05
        0
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        They can not distinguish a ballistic missile from an artillery shell?

        The same thought visited. Who was talking about the high technology of South Korea?
        1. 0255
          0255 3 March 2016 10: 38
          -1
          Quote: Misha Honest
          Quote: Ami du peuple
          They can not distinguish a ballistic missile from an artillery shell?

          The same thought visited. Who was talking about the high technology of South Korea?

          At least Samsung and LG do you know? Which, incidentally, have their own factories in Russia, give work to Russian citizens.
          1. Misha Honest
            Misha Honest 3 March 2016 11: 10
            +3
            Quote: 0255
            At least Samsung and LG do you know? Which, incidentally, have their own factories in Russia, give work to Russian citizens.

            I know. It seems that these firms have helped South Korea to distinguish rockets from shells, right? winked
            And, by the way - S. Korea does not allow the Yankees to appear at military bases. It will appear right on the border of the Primorsky Territory. request
        2. Avantageur
          Avantageur 3 March 2016 11: 44
          0
          Quote: Misha Honest
          Quote: Ami du peuple
          They can not distinguish a ballistic missile from an artillery shell?

          The same thought visited. Who was talking about the high technology of South Korea?

          Maybe they meant rocket artillery (MLRS) of the type: "Katyushas", "Grads", "Tornadoes", etc. ...


          1. Misha Honest
            Misha Honest 3 March 2016 12: 20
            +1
            Quote: Avantageur
            Maybe they meant rocket artillery (MLRS) of the type: "Katyushas", "Grads", "Tornadoes", etc. ...

            Thank you, I know what it is. winked If the South Korean military confused the launches of the MLRS and the BRMD, then what do they do in their posts?
            Article about short-range ballistic missiles: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/618010
            1. Avantageur
              Avantageur 3 March 2016 12: 39
              -1
              Quote: Misha Honest
              Quote: Avantageur
              Maybe they meant rocket artillery (MLRS) of the type: "Katyushas", "Grads", "Tornadoes", etc. ...

              Thank you, I know what it is. winked If the South Korean military confused the launches of the MLRS and the BRMD, then what do they do in their posts?
              Article about short-range ballistic missiles: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/618010

              Something I do not see on the BRMD DPRK list there ... It should be so, right?
              1. Misha Honest
                Misha Honest 3 March 2016 13: 05
                +1
                Quote: Avantageur
                Something I do not see on the BRMD DPRK list there ... It should be so, right?

                You yourself look for laziness, right? Anyway...
                1. Toksa short-range ballistic tactical missile (Toksa, KN-02 according to NATO code). DPRK mastered the production of an analogue of the Tochka-U missile system in 2005, with a range of 100-120 km [23]. Located on a mobile 3-axis SPU.
                2. Short-range ballistic tactical missile "Hwasong-5" ("Hwasong-5", KN-03 according to the NATO code). Range of 320 km, in service since 1985, DPRK's own development. Located on a mobile 4-axis SPU.
                3. Short-range ballistic tactical missile "Hwasong-6" ("Hwasong-6", KN-04 according to the NATO code). Range of 700 km, DPRK's own development, adopted by the armed forces in 1990, 300-600 pcs. in service. It is located on a mobile 4-axis SPU [24].

                Full article: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean
                1. Avantageur
                  Avantageur 3 March 2016 13: 21
                  0
                  Quote: Misha Honest
                  You yourself look for laziness, right?

                  And why should I search if you provided me with a link: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/618010, in which I do not see the DPRK, so I asked a question ...

                  Quote: Avantageur
                  Something I do not see on the BRMD DPRK list there ... It should be so, right?

                  1. Misha Honest
                    Misha Honest 3 March 2016 13: 50
                    0
                    Quote: Avantageur
                    And why should I search if you provided me with a link: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/618010, in which I do not see the DPRK, so I asked a question ...

                    I gave you that article, only so that you notice the general significant difference between the MLRS and the BRMD. Only.
                    1. Avantageur
                      Avantageur 3 March 2016 13: 59
                      0
                      Quote: Misha Honest
                      Quote: Avantageur
                      And why should I search if you provided me with a link: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/618010, in which I do not see the DPRK, so I asked a question ...

                      I gave you that article, only so that you notice the general significant difference between the MLRS and the BRMD. Only.

                      You brought up the topic of artillery, so I offered you such an option as "rocket artillery" (which you never thought of). What does it have to do with: difference between MLRS and BRMD?

                      Quote: Misha Honest
                      Quote: Ami du peuple
                      They are a ballistic missile from an artillery shell can not distinguish?

                      The same thought visited. Who was talking about the high technology of South Korea?


                      Specialists “also did not exclude that the North Korean military could actually conduct artillery fire,” the newspaper notes. The representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Moon Gyun, in turn, said that “all fired missiles (shells) fell into the sea "


                      Reactive artillery - a type of artillery using reactive shells, i.e., delivering the projectile to the target, using a jet engine mounted on the projectile itself and, due to the action of jet propulsion, informing the projectile of the required flight speed
                      1. Misha Honest
                        Misha Honest 3 March 2016 14: 37
                        0
                        Quote: Avantageur
                        You brought up the topic of artillery, so I offered you such an option as "rocket artillery" (which you never thought of). What does it have to do with the difference between MLRS and BRMD?

                        So I’m telling you about this: that the South Koreans cannot distinguish the trajectory of the BRMD missile from the MLRS? Since they themselves detected missiles or shells, then their flight path too? So why then can they not determine what S. Koreans fired at ?!
                      2. Avantageur
                        Avantageur 3 March 2016 15: 11
                        0
                        Quote: Misha Honest
                        So I’m telling you about this: that the South Koreans cannot distinguish the trajectory of the BRMD missile from the MLRS?

                        I guess they can. But what does the BRMD have to do with it? I cannot understand this!
                        May ask the artillery professor, Ami du peuple?
                      3. Misha Honest
                        Misha Honest 3 March 2016 15: 43
                        0
                        Quote: Avantageur
                        But what does the BRMD have to do with it? I cannot understand this!

                        Please re-read the article and the title ... winked It seems to me that it is clearly written there that the South Koreans are not sure what S. Koreans were bullied ... So I developed the idea of ​​Ami du peuple, doubting the level of military technology of South Korea ...
                      4. Avantageur
                        Avantageur 3 March 2016 15: 52
                        0
                        Quote: Misha Honest
                        Quote: Avantageur
                        But what does the BRMD have to do with it? I cannot understand this!

                        Please re-read the article and the title ...

                        You have the same recommendations ... And find in this article something about the BRMD.
                      5. Misha Honest
                        Misha Honest 3 March 2016 16: 04
                        +1
                        Quote: Avantageur
                        You have the same recommendations ... And find in this article something about the BRMD.


                        DPRK launches short-range missiles in the direction of the Sea of ​​Japan

                        The DPRK military launched several short-range missiles from the east coast of the republic towards the Sea of ​​Japan, RIAH reports news agency Yenhap.

                        Now hammer into any search engine the words: short-range missiles. And look at the results: everywhere there are articles only about the BRMD and there is not a word about the MLRS installation ... MLRS is considered rocket artillery, and not missile weapons.
                      6. Avantageur
                        Avantageur 3 March 2016 18: 27
                        0
                        Now hammer into any search engine the words: short-range missiles. And look at the results:

                        Yes, what a search engine gives out on a request is a "weighty argument".
                        Now read this for example:

                        For the MLRS BM-21 was developed 122 mm unguided missile, whose design had a revolutionary effect on the development of post-war rocket artillery. At the suggestion of the chief designer of NII-147 A.N. The Ganichev shell of the projectile is manufactured not by traditional machining from steel blanks, but by a high-performance method of rolling and drawing from steel sheet.

                        Another feature of the ML-BMZ-21 rocket is folding stabilizer planes, which are held in a closed position by a special ring and do not go beyond the dimensions of the projectile. The folding stabilizer itself was not the invention of Tula designers. For example, such a stabilizer was used in the German uncontrolled aircraft missile R4M, the numerous elongated stabilizer feathers of which in the folded position occupied the space around the specially elongated engine nozzle, and, after the rocket left the launch device, leaned back, forming a kind of twig broom. However, this design required artificial extension of the rocket nozzle, thereby increasing its weight and dimensions. In the design of the missile system "Grad" another scheme was adopted. The stabilizer feather was made not flat, but in the form of a sector of the cylinder, curved when viewed from the front along an arc with a radius close to half the diameter of the rocket. The developers called this form the "crow's wing." In the folded position, the surface of the stabilizers continued to extend the cylinder of the rocket engine housing. The disclosure of the stabilizer block, held up by the ring before the start, was carried out by a spring mechanism. In the open position, the stabilizer blades were rotated 1 ° relative to the plane passing through the longitudinal axis of the projectile, which ensured a twist relative to this axis to reduce the influence of the eccentricity of the thrust and the center of mass.

                        http://kollektsiya.ru/artilleriya/111-puskovaya-ustanovka-bm-21-grad.html
                      7. Avantageur
                        Avantageur 3 March 2016 18: 32
                        0
                        Or this:

                        Jet artillery of the period of the Second World War:

                        Jet artillery has a fairly long history. The first rocket samples, fireworks and crackers were known as far back as the Middle Ages. The first combat use of such weapons apparently took place in medieval China.

                        To this day, drawings of the Korean Khvachkhi installation have been preserved, which was a wagon with a multiply-charged launcher mounted on it, in which numerous rockets with steel tips were located. However, the benefits of using this weapon were very doubtful due to low accuracy and unreliability. Nevertheless, the installation could have a powerful psychological effect on the enemy soldiers. The real heyday of rocket artillery occurred during the Second World War, when it appeared on the battlefields in massive numbers, proving its effectiveness. It was during World War II that the warring countries were able to convince themselves of the tremendous destructive power and effectiveness of these weapons.

                        One of the symbols of World War II will forever remain Soviet Katyusha. During the war years, rocket artillery was able to perfectly complement the artillery barrel and after the conflict, all modern artillery developed under the influence and experience of military operations on the fronts of the Second World War. In this regard, Katyusha gave rise to a special kind of artillery - mobile multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), which can be moved directly with troops, accompanying their actions with fire and quickly changing firing positions.

                        http://www.achinskpress.ru/istoriya/402-reaktivnaya-artilleriya-perioda-vtoroj-m
                        irovoj-vojny

                      8. Avantageur
                        Avantageur 3 March 2016 22: 58
                        0
                        By the way, in VO I also read a little here:




  2. Avantageur
    Avantageur 3 March 2016 12: 59
    +1
    By the way, it is still unknown what they launched there ...

    The Ministry of Defense of South Korea said that the means of objective monitoring recorded launches from the district of Wonsan. The missiles were launched at 10:00 in the morning (04:00 Moscow time), they fell into the Sea of ​​Japan. The type and number of launched missiles is being specified. Other launch details are not yet known.
  • Avantageur
    Avantageur 3 March 2016 15: 46
    +1
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    They can not distinguish a ballistic missile from an artillery shell?

    Not respected, among the not respected Ami du peuple, from which finger do you forgive, suck, about a ballistic missile? Are you not in the courses that short-range rocket artillery shells are also called rockets? Did you study wikipedia in primary school?
  • Vladimir 23rus
    Vladimir 23rus 3 March 2016 18: 22
    0
    Official information has already passed that they were several missiles (three in my opinion) with a caliber of 122 mm. We are waiting for new sanctions wassat
  • vodolaz
    vodolaz 3 March 2016 10: 50
    +2
    Interesting missiles from the Koreans, since they take them for shells. In general, I do not understand what the leaders of the DPRK are seeking.
  • Baron Wrangell
    Baron Wrangell 3 March 2016 08: 27
    0
    I would add, the launch was carried out with the aim of training the calculations of air defense and the Pacific Fleet. All targets have been successfully discovered and destroyed! smile
    1. atalef
      atalef 3 March 2016 08: 30
      10
      as far as I understand . this is in response to the unanimous approval by the UN Security Council of a new package of sanctions against S. Korea.
  • Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 3 March 2016 08: 34
    +2
    They can’t play enough with fire.
    1. 0255
      0255 3 March 2016 10: 03
      -1
      Quote: Alexandr2637
      They can’t play enough with fire.

      So the damned South Korea and the United States give Kim help after he once again threatens with his missiles. Dude earns food for his people as he can laughing
  • Masya masya
    Masya masya 3 March 2016 08: 51
    +8
    They put all the sanctions together ...
  • russak-26
    russak-26 3 March 2016 08: 53
    +8
    it is not clear why we supported the sanctions against the DPRK request
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 3 March 2016 09: 18
      +2
      Quote: russak-26
      it is not clear why we supported the sanctions against the DPRK

      Live a month in the DPRK and create a petition to the president on the Kremlin’s website for tightening sanctions against the DPRK
      1. Zankish
        Zankish 3 March 2016 09: 30
        0
        Have you lived? )))
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 3 March 2016 09: 37
          0
          Quote: Zankish
          Have you lived? )))

          I was there hi
  • igorek4515
    igorek4515 3 March 2016 08: 59
    +5
    The DPRK recently tested a new anti-tank missile system. Here's the link:
    http://news.rambler.ru/scitech/32932000/
    The DPRK military industry has developed a new anti-tank missile system (ATGM) with a laser guidance system. Bulsae-3 complex shooting at the firing range was demonstrated to the country's leader Kim Jong-un. This was reported by Naenara.
    As noted in the message, the complex is equipped with a missile with a laser guidance system, and is capable of hitting modern tanks with combined armor protection. Details of the development of the complex were not reported, however, in the comments of the famous Russian military god bmpd, conducted by experts from the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST), it was noted that Bulsae-3 is a development of the Bulsae-2 ATGM, in turn, created on the basis of the Soviet 9K111 complex "Bassoon" (AT-4 Spigot according to NATO classification).
    From the "Bassoon" complex is marked by an elongated missile with a longer firing range (up to 5,5 kilometers, according to experts) and a laser guidance system instead of a semi-automatic wired. Thus, in terms of its performance characteristics, it corresponds to the modern Russian ATGM “Cornet”. It is assumed that the new ATGM will be able to hit modern tanks of the USA, South Korea and Japan in the frontal projection.

    Here is a photo:
  • sergej30003
    sergej30003 3 March 2016 09: 14
    +8
    why such sanctions did not lead against Turkey and Ishil, because there people are more likely to die for the interests of others
    1. k174oun7
      k174oun7 3 March 2016 11: 32
      +1
      Turkish citizens, while supporting ISIS, grin at Russia at the same time. And this is the main condition for their "moderation." And the democrats do not impose sanctions against the moderate.
  • igorek4515
    igorek4515 3 March 2016 09: 41
    +1
    I was there

    That I strongly doubt ..
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 3 March 2016 09: 56
      0
      Quote: igorek4515

      That I strongly doubt ..

      Indeed, how can a person who has visited the DPRK pour mud on this magnificent country, where the dreams of every citizen are fulfilled.
      A person who has visited the DPRK cannot write badly about a country where paradise is embodied on earth. Where a leader wipes a tear to everyone.
      It’s only a pity that you won’t be forced to kick in there personally.
    2. padded jacket
      padded jacket 3 March 2016 15: 53
      -1
      Quote: igorek4515

      I was there


      That I strongly doubt ..

      By the way, I don’t believe it either.

      Quote: BlackMokona


      “Six missiles, supposedly 300mm caliber, were launched today at 10:00 am (04:00 Moscow time) from the area of ​​the city of Wonsan, where a large naval base is located,” he said. “All of them fell into the Sea of ​​Japan after flying from 100 to 150 km ".
      More on TASS:
      http://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/2713581

      Perhaps they just tested their new 300-mm MLRS KN-09 with a firing range of 180-200 km?

      Some with such a significant look speak of these terrible sanctions imposed by the UN - but no one has read these sanctions and does not know what is in them smile
  • igorek4515
    igorek4515 3 March 2016 09: 43
    +2
    why such sanctions did not lead against Turkey and Ishil, because there people are more likely to die for the interests of others

    Because international law has long been replaced by the "law of the strong" ..
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • R-22
    R-22 3 March 2016 09: 54
    0
    Well done Koreans, and you need to take away gold and titanium from them, because of sanctions you can bargain)))
  • Yugan Oleg
    Yugan Oleg 3 March 2016 09: 58
    +2
    I was surprised that it was not just a missile launch, but as many as "SEVERAL", and maybe not missiles at all, but artillery shells.
    The question arises - was there a boy?
  • aviator1913
    aviator1913 3 March 2016 10: 07
    -1
    YES when the fat man calms down. It seems that he studied in Switzerland, there are brains, the world looked, but he does the same thing ... Blackmail, blackmail and again blackmail. A month later, again, tankers with fuel oil and wheat will be asked, in exchange for a ban on missile tests for six months, then again on a new one .. This series is already bored.
    1. Dam
      Dam 3 March 2016 10: 20
      +2
      And if you were overlaid on all sides and were constantly trying to democratize on all sides, would you calm down?
    2. 0255
      0255 3 March 2016 10: 21
      +2
      Quote: aviator1913
      YES when the fat man calms down. It seems that he studied in Switzerland, there are brains, the world looked, but he does the same thing ... Blackmail, blackmail and again blackmail. A month later, again, tankers with fuel oil and wheat will be asked, in exchange for a ban on missile tests for six months, then again on a new one .. This series is already bored.

      But 95% of VO commentators admire the "great marshal" Kim just for the fact that he threatens to launch a nuclear missile at the United States and has forbidden everything that is possible, while living in the CIS countries themselves, they enjoy the benefits of civilization prohibited in the DPRK and minus proposals to move to live in beloved Juche country.
  • sa-ag
    sa-ag 3 March 2016 10: 21
    0
    interesting question to whom is it beneficial?
  • A-Sim
    A-Sim 3 March 2016 10: 25
    +1
    It looks like new sanctions were greeted with a festive fireworks ...
  • Blackmokona
    Blackmokona 3 March 2016 10: 25
    +5
    The situation is this, the situation is simple
  • capitosha1rang
    capitosha1rang 3 March 2016 10: 55
    +2
    What does "short-range missiles" mean in the voice acting of the DPRK?
    Maybe a volley of mortars?
    Some kind of premature ejaculation is obtained ...
  • Blackmokona
    Blackmokona 3 March 2016 11: 19
    0
    “Six missiles, supposedly 300mm caliber, were launched today at 10:00 am (04:00 Moscow time) from the area of ​​the city of Wonsan, where a large naval base is located,” he said. “All of them fell into the Sea of ​​Japan after flying from 100 to 150 km ".


    More on TASS:
    http://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/2713581
  • Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 3 March 2016 12: 41
    -1
    “The resolution prohibits the supply of aviation and rocket fuel to the DPRK, all cargo going to and from the DPRK will be inspected. The document also prohibits the sale of DPRK all conventional weapons; significantly limits the export from the country of coal, iron, gold, titanium and rare natural minerals. Also introduced financial sanctions against banks of the DPRK "
    I hope our authorities did not sign this fig leaf? Koreans, as I understand it, do not violate anything. They have full moral right. smile
    1. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona 3 March 2016 18: 01
      +1
      Signed and supported, resented along with the west.
  • mr.grin19z
    mr.grin19z 3 March 2016 12: 56
    0
    kareytsy in their repertoire they laid on amerikosov the more they will be clamped the more they will snap
  • igorek4515
    igorek4515 3 March 2016 13: 21
    +1
    It’s only a pity that you won’t be forced to kick in there personally.

    Maybe stop sending all those who disagree with you for permanent residence in North Korea ..? As the famous saying goes, "don't tell me what to do and I won't tell you where to go .."
    1. 0255
      0255 3 March 2016 14: 01
      0
      Quote: igorek4515
      It’s only a pity that you won’t be forced to kick in there personally.

      Maybe stop already all those who disagree with you to send for permanent residence in North Korea ..?

      Why not? In the same place, according to the fans of the "great leader", everything is cool, there is no hunger, corruption and crime, all the benefits of civilization that have come to us from the decaying west are prohibited there. If you admire the realities of North Korea, why are you hostile to proposals to go there? laughing
      How am I being pinned by those who, living in civilized countries, having what is impossible for "ordinary" North Koreans, think that everything is fine in the DPRK ...
  • igorek4515
    igorek4515 3 March 2016 13: 22
    -1
    I hope our authorities did not sign this fig leaf?

    Alas and ah ..! not only signed but were also among the initiators of this "fig leaf" .. Unfortunately ...
    1. 0255
      0255 3 March 2016 14: 03
      +1
      Quote: igorek4515
      I hope our authorities did not sign this fig leaf?

      Alas and ah ..! not only signed but were also among the initiators of this "fig leaf" .. Unfortunately ...

      That's right, Russia does not need the inadequate threatening nuclear weapons to neighboring countries when food runs out.