Mine tests of the Ural-VV armored car. Video

The tests of the armored car "Ural-VV", which was originally ordered from the manufacturer for the troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and now the Russian Ministry of Defense is interested in it, continue. One of the tests of the car, which was carried out the other day, is associated with the mine protection of the Ural-VV. A video appeared on YouTube on the Denis Mokrushin channel on YouTube, which shows how under the armored vehicle the explosive device undermines the power to 2 kg in TNT.

The mine was laid under the front right wheel of the Ural-VV, and after the explosion the right side of the front axle went deep enough into the ground. However, the engine of the armored car continued its work, as if there had never been any detonation. The body and cabin of the test "Ural-VV" did not receive serious damage that would somehow threaten the crew and personnel if people were inside the car.

Further tests decided to turn into a truly radical armored car. Under it (in the area of ​​the right middle wheel) an explosive device with a capacity of about 6 kg in TNT equivalent was laid. Surprisingly, the Russian car withstood this tremendous explosive load. The body and cabin of the armored car again did not receive serious damage.

The fact that the staff could have protected the armor from such an explosive impact, if people were inside the new Ural, has not yet been reported.

Another test - the shelling of the cab of an armored car of various types of small weapons from close range. The result is presented in frames of the video:

Comments

[chikenous59]

The fact that the staff could have protected the armor from such an explosive impact, if people were inside the new Ural, has not yet been reported.

Then what are these tests for? Show that the car remained intact, but the personnel xs?

[Now we are free]

With all my deep respect for the workaholic "Kamaz", I am inclined to believe that "Typhoon" and just army / BB trucks should be based on the "Ural" because "One and a half meters of life" (the distance from the wheel to the driver's seat) are expensive in the mine action plan ... Of course, we can say that now there are many remote control devices (which can be blown up directly when the car body passes over the explosive), but this is so, BUT:
1) First, remotely controlled ammunition requires direct observation of the target / location near the place of detonation (which is not always possible for militants / saboteurs), plus the radio signal may be jammed, or the WU will be activated earlier from electronic anti-mine devices, which can be installed on a car.
2) The old "good mine" of push action is much cheaper and more reliable.

PS
Yes, it is possible to install mines with a slowdown BUT they are not found so often, and there are not so many wizards who can install a slowdown on a mine of push action.

[Vadim237]

Something the guys have some modest tests, there is South Africa MRAP, on the Ural platform, an explosion of as much as 21 kilograms of TNT can withstand.

[wanderer_032]

Quote: Vadim237

Something the guys have some modest tests, there is South Africa MRAP, on the Ural platform, an explosion of as much as 21 kilograms of TNT can withstand.

From "Ural" there are only units. Undercarriage units, transmission units and units and engine. The carrying armored hull itself is made in South Africa.

[Lopatov]

Quote: Now we are free

2) The old "good mine" of push action is much cheaper and more reliable.

That's just to disguise it on the road is almost impossible. This is a question of driver training. Do not ride through puddles and funnel filled in the roadway, and everything will be the way.
And just here these "half a meter of life" can get in the way.

In addition, in the "big war" of the enemy's RDGs, anti-aircraft mines will be used, and magnetic mines, primarily cumulative mines, will become the main danger to equipment. it follows that in a big war, all these MRAPs are simply useless.

[Lopatov]

For gifted minusers.

According to the enemy’s RDG: the American SLAM M2 mine weighs 1 kg. At the same time, when using a mine as an anti-aircraft, the tank will be immobilized precisely, and when used as an anti-aircraft with a high probability it will be destroyed.
The Swedish anti-aircraft Bofors FFV weighs 2.6 kg. And at the same time it has armor penetration at a distance of 30 meters to 60 mm of homogeneous armor.
Well, the heaviest anti-tank mines that can use RDGs are things like the M93 HORNET, hitting targets from above.

No one will pull a few artillery shells or a centner of TNT on the hump;

For mines established in the interests of combined arms units: modern combat operations are fleeting, anti-tank mines of pressure action manually installed in the ground will not have special use. First of all, remote mining. That is, or light anti-vehicle mines, whose task is to immobilize. Or more powerful anti-bottom mines with a magnetic target sensor (and most of them)

Accordingly, MRAPs cannot provide protection against the above mines. In addition to anti-transport, but there they are redundant. That is, in a normal modern warfare, equipment with enhanced protection against explosions is simply not needed.

[igorka357]

Listen dear "now you are free", I certainly understand that you are a pro and all that .. but to write that "one and a half meters of life" is the distance from the wheel to the driver's seat, this is a natural disgrace! One and a half meters of life in the driver's slang means the distance from the bumper of the Urals to the driver, and implies that you will be protected by the engine in a head-on collision, but KamAZ does not have this, and the carrier flies straight into the oncoming lane!

[Now we are free]

Greetings Igor (well, not Igor 357 call you)
1).

Quote: igorka357

Listen dear "now you're free"

Dear - Car dear S.Ya. Marshak in the poem, but I have a name like you.
2).

Quote: igorka357

I certainly understand that you are a pro and all that ..

I personally did not voice that I am a pro "and so on" ...
3).

Quote: igorka357

to write that "one and a half meters of life" is the distance from the wheel to the driver's seat, this is a natural disgrace!

What is the shame? That you have heard this term only in its "Civilian" performance? My condolences or congratulations (I don’t know) for the fact that you are not familiar with this term from military / BB drivers. This term (in the military version) dates back to the Afghan war, so note for you. Regarding his "Civic reading" - where does my comment say that "One and a half meters of life" can only refer to protection from mines?
4). And yes, take the trouble to measure the distance from the front left wheel touching the ground to the driver’s seat of the Urals and the distance as you said -

Quote: igorka357

from the bumper of the Urals to the driver

(Very surprised by the result )
5).

Quote: igorka357

You certainly cleverly clever

- I didn’t even think "Starry" does not suffer.
6).

Quote: igorka357

but somehow the sediment remained!

- Well, stop it, we're not in the old joke about the Jews ...

[smershxnumx]

I am for "Ural", no matter what they say! Kamaz is good, but I am only for Ural. Who knows, he will understand.
"Minushers" I suggest to drive a "Kamaz" (dviglo almost behind the cabin !!!) along the road with mines, land mines, ambushes.
Or when in front of one and a half meters of cast iron ("Ural") - as they say in Odessa: "These are two big differences" ...

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: chikenous59

Then what are these tests for?

Do you think you need to cancel the test? from damn how many eccentrics in Russia are experiencing tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, ships, why yes

[chikenous59]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Quote: chikenous59

Then what are these tests for?

Do you think you need to cancel the test? from damn how many eccentrics in Russia are experiencing tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, ships, why yes

What fool do you turn on?
No, not to cancel, but to carry out tests so that it is clear what will happen to the personnel after such explosions.
Or is it again that the media wrote so that they misled us.

[Tibidokh]

Quote: chikenous59

carry out tests so that it is clear what will happen to the personnel after such bombings.

I think such a mannequin would fit.
http://www.mobus.com/modules/news/images/articles/1228129983136649.jpg

[Lopatov]

Correspondent.net:

Russian military undermines pigs as part of tests of armored vehicles Wolf and Bear

http://korrespondent.net/world/russia/1431240-rossijskie-voennye-podryvayut-svin
ej-v-ramkah-ispytanij-bronemashin-volk-i-medved-istochnik

[Volodin]

Quote: chikenous59

No, not to cancel, but to carry out tests so that it is clear what will happen to the personnel after such explosions.

And the truth is - why waste time on trifles - immediately fill the Ural-VV with a couple of three squads of conscripts and put them on anti-tank mines so that our individual reader is completely satisfied with the tests ...

Then what are these tests for?

More than a strange comment ... As if a single test was carried out, and that was the end of it, and the Ural-VV was supplied to the troops. That is why a whole series of tests is being worked out in order to draw a conclusion on their basis about the strengths and weaknesses of the equipment, and then it will come to the issues of personnel safety - some common truths have to be written now.

[Lopatov]

Deripaska's subordinates stated that they had purchased special mannequins for demolition tests.

So conscripts are not required to be put in a car.

[igorka357]

Why such show-offs from you in the form of draftees, there are special mannequins!

[Lopatov]

Just decided to not show pigs this time. To avoid another scandal.

Plus special mannequins with reg. equipment that was purchased after the scandal with pigs.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: chikenous59

No, not to cancel, but to carry out tests so that it is clear what will happen to the personnel after such explosions.

Great idea, I suggest you drop it into the car cab and blow it up. Then you will tell us all how it was there.

[chikenous59]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Quote: chikenous59

No, not to cancel, but to carry out tests so that it is clear what will happen to the personnel after such explosions.

Great idea, I suggest you drop it into the car cab and blow it up. Then you will tell us all how it was there.

I did not say that soldiers should be sitting there, it would be sufficient to have special mannequins with equipment to analyze the nature and severity of the injuries, if of course they were received.

[da Vinci]

There should sit with Merdyukov, at the wheel - Chubais. And for them to pay a salary!

[Alex_Rarog]

Yes, I think so inside the people would be shell-shocked, but I think no more ...

[chikenous59]

Quote: Alex_Rarog

Yes, I think so inside the people would be shell-shocked, but I think no more ...

So you think, I'm guessing, me too.
And there is no answer after such tests.

[akribos]

If you are guessing, sit yourself. Look, tell, discuss. Sincerely.

[chikenous59]

Quote: akribos

If you are guessing, sit yourself. Look, tell, discuss. Sincerely.

Respectfully, they do not wish this.

[vkl-47]

it would be interesting to look at the manikins inside the car after the explosion. and then some kind of incomplete video

[avt]

Quote: chikenous59

Then what are these tests for? Show that the car remained intact, but the personnel xs?

Do you really need to put test subjects there? Who will we plant? Conscripts or ZK? There are quite a lot of methods and instruments for defining protection and why, even for cattle, how do you put something there when testing nuclear weapons?

The fact that the personnel could protect the armor of the car from such an explosive effect, if people were inside the new Urals, has not yet been reported

does not mean that they were not carried out.

[chikenous59]

Quote: avt

does not mean that they were not carried out.

Quote: Chikenous59

Or is it again that the media wrote so that they misled us.

[RUSIVAN]

In order to show the state of the car after the explosion at the first stage, but these are not the last tests, naturally there will be tests on the survivability of personnel

[Scoun]

Quote: chikenous59

The fact that the staff could have protected the armor from such an explosive impact, if people were inside the new Ural, has not yet been reported.

Then what are these tests for? Show that the car remained intact, but the personnel xs?

I dare to assume that if the armor has withstood, then the next step will be to create the same seats that can soften the effects of the shock wave as well as materials that reduce sound impact. something like this

[Chyudilkin]

This is only a test so far, if the mannequins were inside and they had a full PC, then they should make it so that everything is fine. To do this, and explode!

[Isangrim]

but I don’t like it, what's the point in such a car if after the explosion she goes and everything inside is stuffed ??? it’s better to shred the car than drugs.

[chikenous59]

Quote: Isangrim

but I don’t like it, what's the point in such a car if after the explosion she goes and everything inside is stuffed ??? it’s better to shred the car than drugs.

Yes, it’s too early to raise a panic, the tests will continue, incl. and to study crew protection.
I did not like the fact that not comprehensive tests were carried out.

[arnulla]

The fact that the wheels fly off we saw. What happens inside the cab and the body, no. Is there deformation, damage, it is not clear. And what happens if it explodes under the bottom? Questions to which this video does not answer.

[Tjeck]

What did I understand from the outside, and what was going on in the cabin? After all, this is the main thing ..

[akeloya]

Shock wave, strength depends on the filling of the armor.
All other damaging factors were reflected by the outer skin.

[Reserve buildbat]

Interestingly, this "Ural" was fueled? Withstood 2 kg of TNT, people should not suffer. Good. But 6 kg is already scary. Moreover, in this case, the explosion was under the middle wheel. And what would happen if the front was blown up?

[zlyk19]

This is what Star says about these experiences. There were sensors in the building that monitored the condition and said that everything was within normal limits.

[wasjasibirjac]

the shelling is incomplete, because the requirement for shelling indicates the production of 3 shots in a triangle with a side of 10 cm. There is not a single picture of what is inside, is there a penetration of the armored hull. Or are these preliminary tests, purely for the internal use of "uralo builders"?

[DimerVladimer]

yes - this is a factory test, approbation of the design plan

[Mercenary]

When we tested the Oka remote launch, a ram (maybe a sheep) was put into the complex's cockpit and after launch it received a full amnesty. I understand, with mutton in the middle lane, we could stressfully a cage with mice .... And some modest single shelling from AKM ???

[Tatar 174]

Probably the DVRs have already reached the testers, maybe there was shooting in the body and in the cab and other measuring equipment was located, we don’t know this, but the car didn’t fall apart after 6 kg and even the doors and windows remained intact, the car itself didn’t catch fire , it also says a lot. In short, plus to developers and manufacturers!

[Former battalion commander]

6 kg is nothing. Usually, when mining a road, landmines are used, and this is a pair of three 152 mm shells (about 15-20 kg TNT). And such as in the article "tests" are only for the authorities to report, but they have nothing to do with the real situation during hostilities.

[Lopatov]

They are not shoved into the roadbed. On the sidelines. So ... The tests are quite normal.

In local conflicts, it is most likely to catch an anti-tank mine of push action under the wheel on the side of the road, in some kind of puddle, in a covered pit or crater on the road.

[kot11180]

20 kg TNT no car can not stand, I think the tank can not stand. And 6 kg is the standard and in my opinion the same in the West.