Military Review

Kerry: Washington agreed with Moscow to create a system of missions against the IG

27
The American and Russian sides agreed to create a system for conducting operations against the IS and respecting the armistice agreement, RIA News Statement by US Secretary of State John Kerry.




“We have agreed on a process how to do it. In recent days, I talked several times with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, ”said Kerry.

“We have agreed to create a system that will allow us to ensure that missions being carried out are really carried out only against the Islamic State or Dzhebhat an-Nusra,” he said.

According to the secretary of state, the parties "are extremely serious about reports of violations of the cease-fire agreement."

“And we are not going to discuss them publicly for the press. We intend to eliminate these violations, ”he added.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 1 March 2016 11: 39
    +7
    In order to receive information on upcoming actions in advance and to remove the barmalei from the blow.
    1. cniza
      cniza 1 March 2016 11: 53
      +4
      Quote: armored optimist
      In order to receive information on upcoming actions in advance and to remove the barmalei from the blow.



      It is possible, but everything will be under surveillance and then the United States will drive itself into a dead end.
      1. Samen
        Samen 1 March 2016 12: 12
        +3
        Quote: cniza
        It is possible, but everything will be under surveillance and then the United States will drive itself into a dead end.

        The striped ones are already "at the dead end" of their own "indistinct" strategy. That is why they became more accommodating! hi
        1. Asadullah
          Asadullah 1 March 2016 12: 17
          0
          The striped ones are already "at the dead end" of their own "indistinct" strategy. That is why they became more accommodating!


          Yeah. They are like the face of a cat, in their own derma. Training, you know.
          1. Temples
            Temples 1 March 2016 12: 18
            0
            Turk Kerry will choke for their shelling of Syria?
            Or the untouchable Turks?
          2. Wolverine
            Wolverine 1 March 2016 12: 26
            0
            Yeah, give the coordinates, no? Well then, catch ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. gray smeet
          gray smeet 1 March 2016 12: 17
          +1
          Kerry, the campaign, recalls youth - after all, in his youth he was against the warrior unleashed by the United States ... laughing
      2. Major Yurik
        Major Yurik 1 March 2016 12: 13
        +2
        A good picture of Kerry, I think our Lavrov would love to pour molten bronze on this woodpecker, and put the resulting statue in his cottage, closer to the compost pit! laughing
      3. Simon
        Simon 1 March 2016 12: 27
        0
        Well done Putin, good Americans pinned good They have nowhere to go, gritting their teeth, following the UN instructions, under the control of Russia.! tongue laughing
    2. Pravdarm
      Pravdarm 1 March 2016 12: 14
      +1
      Quote: Bronoptimist, Today, 11:39
      In order to receive information on upcoming actions in advance and to remove the barmalei from the blow.
      After half an hour, I wanted to write off the comment word for word! Your saw and rejoiced! soldier
    3. Tor5
      Tor5 1 March 2016 12: 15
      0
      Trust but verify! Especially with such bad people.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Blondy
      Blondy 1 March 2016 12: 44
      0
      Kerry, of course, said, but how this similarity will look in practice if the states to the territory of Syria have a custom route, i.e. all interoperability will be limited to the exchange of information. Our grandfathers-great-grandfathers already knew about "we plowed".
  2. Dimontius
    Dimontius 1 March 2016 11: 41
    +2
    Kerry is consistent, you can’t argue. One can only hope that their policy decides and will decide in the United States before the election, and not someone else's. Like it or not, but the degree of tension due to Turkey partially subsided, and thanks to him, too.
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 1 March 2016 11: 57
      +1
      Quote: Dimontius
      Kerry is consistent, you can’t argue.

      How can he not be consistent if there is an agreement between the presidents. In general, I think Putin presented Obama with a fact: if there is no truce, then Turkey will invade Syria. We will have to defend it, and maybe the hostilities can be transferred to Turkey. And this is a war with NATO with all that it implies. Does Obama want this end of his rule? Most likely no. Therefore, he agreed to a truce on Putin's terms. But the Pentagon is of course against this, which is why we hear about plan "B", in case of violation of the truce, and of course Moscow. Such are the Americans.
  3. sever.56
    sever.56 1 March 2016 11: 41
    +7
    Well, I do not believe Americans, I DO NOT BELIEVE ... !!!
    Again, they want to implement some cleverly invented options. Or it may simply be unfounded to accuse Russia and Assad of disrupting the ceasefire, without presenting any facts, as was the case with the downed Boeing and the presence of our troops in Donbas.
    And then - get new sanctions. Although we don’t give a damn about them, the tendency to attack Russia on all fronts is clearly visible.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 1 March 2016 11: 43
      +3
      Kerry: Washington agreed with Moscow to create a system of missions against the IG
      all the "missions" are performed ... gamers are crappy.
      1. sever.56
        sever.56 1 March 2016 11: 49
        +2
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        all the "missions" are performed ... gamers are crappy.


        Only, for some reason, all of their "missions" are either impracticable or completed through the ass! And the whole world then rakes up the consequences of the American missions for decades. "
        1. cniza
          cniza 1 March 2016 11: 57
          +4
          Quote: sever.56
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          all the "missions" are performed ... gamers are crappy.


          Only, for some reason, all of their "missions" are either impracticable or completed through the ass!


          Because they act according to the principle - now it’s beneficial and only to us, the interests of others do not matter ... there is no faith in them and cannot be.
        2. The comment was deleted.
  4. Saffron
    Saffron 1 March 2016 11: 41
    0
    2 parties agreed, and the remaining groups of 5 people who want to cheat on them will fly back, and as always they will try to make Russia guilty, such as not promoting a truce.
  5. Bacha
    Bacha 1 March 2016 11: 43
    +1
    So they have already voiced their goals, so that it is the US military that captured the leaders of the Islamic State, and therefore they whine so that Moscow does not bomb the last strongholds of the militants. You don’t know how to defeat with weapons, have time to distribute the pie! As it was in the second world war. And then they will say for decades, it was America who defeated Isis! America type seized and punished the leaders! Otherwise, the whole world will say that the Russians defeated the terrorists.
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 March 2016 11: 44
    +2
    agreed to create a system of operations against the IG

    The fact that the Americans agree is already good. Another thing is how these agreements will be respected and whether there will be attempts on the American side to partially use them only in their own interests, of which Russia will only have to guess.
  7. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 1 March 2016 11: 44
    +1
    Kerry: Washington agreed with Moscow to create a system of missions against the IG
    How Washington loves its Frankenstein ...
  8. avva2012
    avva2012 1 March 2016 11: 47
    +2
    “We have agreed on a process how to do it. In recent days, I talked several times with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, ”said Kerry.

    Well, interestingly, the operations are carried out by the armed forces, and diplomats agree !?
    Not easier for the military? Something, somehow wrong in the tenth kingdom.
  9. 8140
    8140 1 March 2016 11: 51
    +2
    Of course) when it is not profitable for them, we will not discuss it with the press. And with a suitable occasion, they will immediately organize a media for us. And ours are underway)
    Look how well Surkov and Nuland agreed. Ukrainians are shelling Donetsk, but in our media there is peace and quiet. Soon we will discuss sowing and grain crops and "Vostochny" ...
  10. Stinger
    Stinger 1 March 2016 11: 52
    +2
    Decreased, then, to an agreement. It didn’t dictate.
  11. salad
    salad 1 March 2016 11: 59
    +1
    So I think (IMHO) how would these agreements not come out of the Russian Federation sideways! it will be just pagan if all the mess with our videoconferencing goes in vain.
  12. polite people
    polite people 1 March 2016 12: 00
    +1
    All contracting parties have always betrayed Russia. So we know what to expect from the States.
  13. Alex Draga
    Alex Draga 1 March 2016 12: 10
    0
    Tricky JoeKer.
  14. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 1 March 2016 12: 24
    -1
    Better to let them agree, you can at least calculate the opponent’s idea and take reasonable steps to counter it. And on the cunning ass in Russia, they always found the rule.