More 70 talibs destroyed in Afghan Kunduz

17
The security forces of Afghanistan, in the course of successful operations, destroyed in the northern province of Kunduz 71 a militant of the Taliban group, reports RIA News Khaama message.



According to the agency, referring to the head of the Kunduz provincial police, Mohammad Qasim Jangalbakh, "the security forces' units eliminated the 61 militant, including three commanders, in the Dashti-Archi area."

“And the 10 Taliban were destroyed in the Chardar and Khanabad areas,” he added.

The Afghan military continues to conduct antiterrorist operations, despite measures taken by the government to resolve the situation peacefully.

“Kabul invited representatives of the Taliban movement to sit at the table of peace talks scheduled for early March. Negotiations will be held in the capital of Pakistan ", - said the publication.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    29 February 2016 11: 19
    Clearing the bridgehead for daish.
    1. +2
      29 February 2016 11: 21
      The Taliban do not want to swear an igil, so they are beaten.
      1. +4
        29 February 2016 11: 23
        Quote: maxiban
        Clearing the bridgehead for daish.


        Including solve issues where to leave Syria.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. +1
    29 February 2016 11: 19
    Judging by the magnitude of the losses, there is not so much a war there as an armed confrontation.
    Like in the Donbass. No one really knows what to do. Some do not yet have resources, while others have a desire to fight.
    This situation may continue for years.
  3. +1
    29 February 2016 11: 22
    I do not think that in the current geopolitical environment, the activities of the Taliban are contrary to the interests of Russia.
  4. Dam
    +5
    29 February 2016 11: 22
    For some reason, I recalled an old joke about a bear: who considers these Uzbeks at a construction site? Afghan, it's a black hole. This country has been fighting for many centuries and will fight as much. There can be no victory a priori. Especially if Pakistan is close at hand. So, going there 70, going here 70, this will not solve anything. As soon as the pindas come out of there, everything will return to square one. To restore order there, someone like Tamerlane or Joseph Vissarionovich is needed.
    1. 0
      29 February 2016 11: 26
      Or something like Kuzkin’s mother.
    2. 0
      29 February 2016 11: 32
      Quote: Damm
      To restore order there, someone like Tamerlane or Joseph Vissarionovich is needed.

      Do not think that Joseph Almighty)
      In Afghanistan, another mentality, you can only piss them off with a whip, is like adding fuel to a fire.
      1. Dam
        +4
        29 February 2016 11: 39
        The problem of modern civilization is in lying humanism. Either you do not need to start a war, or wage it to the last living enemy. And the mentality has nothing to do with it. By the way, among the Afghans, he is no different from other southerners. The whole mentality: hide, bite, strong - lick his hand. There are simply no states now ready to lay down the mound from the heads of their enemies. So it’s better not to go there, just keep the border, having arranged a 10-kilometer sanitary zone.
      2. 0
        29 February 2016 11: 42
        Quote: chikenous59
        another mentality, you can only piss them off with a whip
        Offer them blow in the ass and feed the cookies? And will they purr?
        1. 0
          29 February 2016 11: 51
          Quote: Pravdarm
          Quote: chikenous59
          another mentality, you can only piss them off with a whip
          Offer them blow in the ass and feed the cookies? And will they purr?

          Lovers can, of course, blow them in the ass and kiss them, and mean that totalitarianism will not work there, it’s time to clean up the roots under the root, otherwise this infection will never stop.
  5. +2
    29 February 2016 11: 25
    Whatever one may say, but in Afghanistan there has never been a strong central government, each tribe has its own "leader" so the showdown will be eternal. As far as I can remember, there is always a fuss among the Spirits, which of them is Glavnyuk.
    1. +1
      29 February 2016 11: 29
      Quote: refrigerator
      Whatever one may say, but in Afghanistan there has never been a strong central government, each tribe has its own "leader" so the showdown will be eternal. As far as I can remember, there is always a fuss among the Spirits, which of them is Glavnyuk.

      I wish the State Department were really worried about the lack of democracy in Afghanistan and wiped this country off the face of the earth, where every second drug grows and shoots his neighbor.
      There would be much less problems. This kind of life among Afghans has been in the blood for many years; it cannot be eradicated in a simple way.
      1. +1
        29 February 2016 11: 43
        Quote: chikenous59
        Quote: refrigerator
        Whatever one may say, but in Afghanistan there has never been a strong central government, each tribe has its own "leader" so the showdown will be eternal. As far as I can remember, there is always a fuss among the Spirits, which of them is Glavnyuk.

        I wish the State Department were really worried about the lack of democracy in Afghanistan and wiped this country off the face of the earth, where every second drug grows and shoots his neighbor.
        There would be much less problems. This kind of life among Afghans has been in the blood for many years; it cannot be eradicated in a simple way.

        The drug business in Afghanistan is the business of mattresses and at the same time the war against us - the lion's share of heroin goes to us and those who want to engage in the production of heroin without their patronage are destroyed
        1. 0
          29 February 2016 11: 52
          Quote: forester
          The drug business in Afghanistan is the business of mattresses and at the same time the war against us - the lion's share of heroin goes to us and those who want to engage in the production of heroin without their patronage are destroyed

          How do you know that? From the news?
          Americans do not control the entire country, and the drug business too.
          And the part that the Americans control will be surely taken by someone else under their roof if the Americans leave the country.
          "A holy place is never empty"
  6. +2
    29 February 2016 11: 37
    When you decide to join the ranks of terrorists with hunger or for money or for some other reason, you need to think about whether human life is worth all of this. Going there they think that they will quickly become rich people, and they will always be only cannon fodder in the hands of puppeteers.
  7. +1
    29 February 2016 11: 54
    What do you want, there is a tribal system, it’s our side of civilization’s benefits, it’s good for them. There’s a cruel way, that you kill a man, that a ram is all one-arm does not flinch. To death, in general, the relationship is simple-ksmet (fate) and that's all ... It’s only in Europe that these refugees cry, how bad they lived there. And none of them work, but they sell drugs very well. Yesterday I just talked to one of the Pakistanis, there’s no visa, no passport, lives in Portugal, then in Spain, the stump doesn’t work, but the money is taken from somewhere to pay for food, accommodation, transportation, that's amazing ... The police and laws here are very liberal, which is what all this rabble uses.