The existence of 80% Russians inappropriate for the economy

315
The existence of 80% Russians inappropriate for the economy


Volumes of Russian oil production (10 million barrels per day) correspond to the indices of its production in Saudi Arabia. The population of the Saudis - 32 million people. The population of the Russian Federation - 144 million people.

You can continue to make faces at an evening talk show, proving that everything will be even better, but the structure of the domestic economy clearly indicates a paradoxical and frightening situation. In the conditions of the “Kudrinsky” economy in Russia, it is advisable that no more than thirty million people live. All the rest - an extra ballast, hanging like a stone on the neck of Rosneft.

One of you will indignantly exclaim that there is nothing in Saudi Arabia but sand. “So this is wonderful!” - A. Kudrin and his colleague, former Prime Minister Kasyanov, will protest.

Here is the net profit from the sale of hydrocarbons. All further conversations do not promise anything but unnecessary losses. Any attempts to develop the economic infrastructure will immediately result in costs, costs, lost profits of exporters of oil. Investment in production is strictly contraindicated. Tear off from the heart and invest part of their own profits in any project. Sponsor job creation. And what in return?

In addition to the need for large costs and possible risks in the formation of a new production, the result will be one. Employees of the company, adding all the profits in the form of wages in their pockets, will run to buy a Japanese foreign car and an American iPhone. Money just flowed out of the country. These are all costs, lost profits. The production itself at the expense of taxes hardly pays off in ten years. Who needs such a project?

It could have been different if “Japanese foreign car”, “iPhone” and other high-tech products were created on domestic capacities. Then the profit would have settled in the country, and the export of high-tech goods brought more profit more than the export of hydrocarbons.

To do this, you need to find 3,5 trillion. dollars, gained in the previous decade from the sale of natural resources and invest these funds in the complete renewal of the industrial base of the country, with the massive creation of high-tech enterprises in all sectors of the economy.

Those who oversee the trade in resources are already in a hurry to liquidate their foreign assets, offshore accounts and transfer everything, up to the last ruble, to the needs of the Motherland.

The course, destructive in all aspects without exception, of accumulating ghostly “stabilization funds” instead of investing these funds in the development of domestic production was taken far now. This happened at the very beginning of the "fat zero", in the era of the premiership of Kasyanov. And it continued all subsequent years under the wise leadership of Finance Minister A. Kudrin. It is these people and their entourage that are the founders of the destructive doctrine that finally put Russia on the point of the “oil needle”.

The current successors of Kudrin still do nothing to correct the situation in the economy. Their anti-crisis plan is more and more like a life-saving anchor, throwing that, you must surely get into your head.

The holy faith in 100 dollars per barrel - all that these “strategies” are guided by in formulating long-term economic development plans.

But enough about the sad.

Symptomatic of the problem

First place in the world in explored reserves of natural gas. The first place in the reserves of iron ore. First place in stocks of silver. First place for the production of palladium. The second place in the world in proven gold reserves. Second place in the world in gold mining ...

A typical rating of the natural resources of the Russian land usually completes the naive question: why aren't the results visible?

This phenomenon is well studied by economists and historians. It is called the “commodity curse”, which is sometimes mistakenly called the raw superpower.

Revenues from the export of minerals do not require the participation of technical progress, they corrupt hearts and minds. It is for this reason that 80% of Russians have become redundant for the economy of their own country.

Russia is not the only country personally convinced of the absurdity of calculating reserves of natural ores as a measure of their wealth.

Our world may disappear if the country of the Congo disappears. Virtually all of the world's reserves of columbite and tantalite are concentrated in the two paradise provinces of South Kivo and Maniema. From a solid solution of columbite and tantalite (coltan) make capacitors. Strategically important raw materials used in all modern chips and electrical appliances.

Answer: how far has the state of the Congo come? Approximately the same as the country Niger with its uranium mines. Not far from them, the Saudis crawled away with their oil boom. Idlers degenerates.

South Korea and Taiwan have nothing at all, but they are developing the fastest. At the modern technological level, the price of the final product is several orders of magnitude higher than the cost of the initial raw materials. A high degree of processing works wonders. As the Japanese minister proudly declared: our only wealth is our people. Everything else does not matter. The same “black gold” can be purchased for pennies anywhere in the world (the average price of oil in the last century was 3 dollars per barrel, in prices of 1960s).

"Man is the measure of all things" (Plato)

The country and the people who inhabit it, presented to the world an endless list of technical inventions and discoveries - Russia. She deserves more than the honorary title of "northern gas station."

A rational anti-crisis plan is a gradual refusal to export any raw materials. Enough Have played enough.

Production should be limited - only to cover their own needs and accelerate the development of domestic industry.

State Duma deputy (“Fair Russia” faction) Oleg Pakholkov sent an appeal to the head of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Alexei Ulyukayev to consider the possibility of completely stopping the sale of oil abroad within five years.

News from 5 February 2016

Many will reproach supporters of such a decision of being too categorical and idealistic. But the process goes on its own, not paying attention to the expectations of the supporters of oil “on 100 per barrel”. To translate the raw material economy on the rails of high technology does not require many words. Important decision makers are interested in maximizing profits. And if you don’t win with oil, then the capital will go into a new direction.

Thus, over the past few years, the capitalization of Gazprom has decreased fivefold. Nearby, crude oil exporting companies tumbled into the mud.

At the same time, at the height of the crisis, the capitalization of the largest Russian petrochemical holding SIBUR doubled. High technology works wonders.

The facts irrefutably show that all this abomination, sanctions and crisis will ultimately play into the hands of the domestic economy. Russia for the hundredth time will be right. We do not have extra people.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

315 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +45
    2 March 2016 06: 28
    The facts show irrefutably that all this abomination, sanctions and the crisis will ultimately play into the hands of the domestic economy.

    Yes, the principle "everything that does not kill us makes us stronger" cannot be canceled. But this principle does not promise a well-fed, quiet life.
    1. +24
      2 March 2016 06: 56
      The population of the Russian Federation is 144 million.

      . The population of Russia as of January 1, 2015 was 146 people.

      . The total population of Russia as of January 1, 2016 is 146 519 759 people

      . According to preliminary estimates, the population growth of Russia in 2015 amounted to 0.17%, or 252 people.

      With the Crimea.
      1. +3
        3 March 2016 07: 40
        Quote: subbtin.725

        According to preliminary estimates, the population growth of Russia in 2015 amounted to 0.17%, or 252 people.

        With the Crimea.

        No negative dynamics? No. And this is already good. Take a look at many European countries. If you do not take migrants into account, the dynamics there are far from rosy.
        Regarding the Crimea:
        If you are not too lazy and find a stupid tablet on the Internet PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF POPULATION NUMBER as of January 1, 2016 and on average for 2015
        , then you will see that in 2015 Crimea was already represented / counted as part of Russia. What is this sadness about?
        The people startled from the crisis and from 100 dollars each, but did not stop giving birth.
    2. +17
      2 March 2016 07: 19
      Sensatus- But this principle does not promise a well-fed calm life
      a full and calm life ... how boring it is! wassat
      1. +26
        2 March 2016 08: 26
        To do this, you need to find 3,5 trillion. dollars, gained in the previous decade from the sale of natural resources and invest these funds in the complete renewal of the industrial base of the country, with the massive creation of high-tech enterprises in all sectors of the economy.

        First you need to open any textbook on economic theory, find in the text the questions "What? How? And For whom?" produce and respond to them. Honestly and impartially. And then to invest something somewhere.
        The amount of 3.5 trillion. dollars is absolutely fantastic. "Get up off your knees" will have to have a very modest capital, which would be more correct to spend on the development of science and education, otherwise it is very fun to work with young specialists, it feels like universities are not preparing a professional, but an interesting person.
        A rational anti-crisis plan is a gradual refusal to export any raw materials. Enough Have played enough.

        No, a rational anti-crisis plan is, first of all, creating conditions for doing business. Ensuring equality of all before the law and the courts, supporting competition, fighting corruption and arbitrariness at the local level, competent tax policy, ensuring access to cheap "long" money (this will be difficult), openness and predictability of government bodies, etc. And certainly no "mask shows" on the territory of neighboring states and similar upheavals, money loves silence.
        1. +35
          2 March 2016 09: 19
          I liked everything in your comment, except for this one!
          Quote: Daniel
          And certainly no "mask shows" on the territory of neighboring states and similar upheavals, money loves silence.


          As I understand it, you mean our mythical troops in Ukraine ?! No, I completely admit the presence of our military consultants and the like, but who inspired you that money loves silence ?! Judging by the mattresses, money is loved by those who print it and fight for them around the world, and silence is not visible and close! Yes, right, money likes to be where it is quiet, but where it is quiet, it makes loud all over the planet! And until the mattress covers are destroyed, there will be nothing good. Carthage phishington must be destroyed!
          1. +3
            2 March 2016 12: 55
            Quote: Diana Ilyina
            And until the mattress covers are destroyed, there will be nothing good. Carthage Fashington Must Be Destroyed!
            Nda lol diagnosis. I recall a joke from life:
            Musikapi! Recently, my three-year-old daughter has taken the habit after eating, before leaving the table to say "Musikapi".
            My husband and I puzzled for a long time, that would mean this word, and then one day I went to pick up my daughter ahead of time from the kindergarten. The kids were having dinner. The teacher ate with the children. Not noticing me in the doorway, she finished eating sweetly reached out and said languidly: Oh! Man would...
            1. +13
              2 March 2016 14: 48
              Quote: Arbogast
              Nda lol diagnosis.


              You follow your diagnosis! As for my men, it’s not your business, you didn’t keep a candle over my bed, as far as I know!
          2. +5
            2 March 2016 14: 12
            Quote: Diana Ilyina
            Carthage Fashington Must Be Destroyed!


            Ahem ... let me add: and the sly fox LondOn - too ... And then they hid, and it seems to have nothing to do with everything happening in the world ...
          3. +2
            3 March 2016 12: 34
            Money loves a machine tool and aug
        2. +18
          2 March 2016 11: 28
          You will have to get up off your knees with very modest capital


          Stalin did not even have such modest capital. And nothing, managed.
          1. +34
            2 March 2016 12: 36
            Quote: Pereira
            You will have to get up off your knees with very modest capital


            Stalin did not even have such modest capital. And nothing, managed.


            He did not manage alone, the whole country worked, and often (or even in most cases) - with enthusiasm. People knew that they didn’t work for the Rottenberg and Co. pockets, and in fact strove for a brighter future.
            In my opinion, a modern consumer society cannot replicate the feat of the Soviet people. And the reason is not at all that we suddenly became so mercantile and unkind, but that most people do not see the point in selfless work, since the result of work will not be a new school or hospital for ALL, but a new yacht of the next oligarch.
            And since the oligarchs are not going to leave the government anywhere, I somehow do not see any reason for economic optimism)))

            PS: I am ambiguous about Stalin, but it is impossible to detract from the scale of the achievements of that period.
            1. +2
              3 March 2016 09: 37
              Quote: oxana_iv
              since the result of labor will not be a new school or hospital for ALL, but a new yacht of the next oligarch.
              Here! Only good, necessary goods are in demand. Russia-oil, gas, weapons, wheat, timber, mineral fertilizers, a large surplus value only in the defense industry, the rest is raw materials. Raw material tycoons will not invest in production; it is easier for them to buy Western goods and support a western producer. Who else has the means to create enterprises for the deep processing of raw materials ?? Banks are not their profile, officials (thieves) -they are only interested in luxury goods, the state? -With private property it is ridiculous, the state will build a plant and who can buy it? WHO IN RUSSIA will be able to launch from scratch a new highly profitable production?
              1. +1
                3 March 2016 18: 06
                Only god! But He is far away. hi
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. 0
              3 March 2016 18: 09
              Or maybe those who talk about the "golden" billion are right? It just seems to me (crossed himself just in case smile ) that they themselves have no place among this billion. hi
          2. +16
            2 March 2016 14: 17
            Stalin did not even have such modest capital. And nothing, managed.


            He had no oligarchs and had a planned economy not sharpened by profit.
            1. +1
              2 March 2016 14: 55
              Quote: alicante11
              Stalin did not even have such modest capital. And nothing, managed.


              He had no oligarchs and had a planned economy not sharpened by profit.

              In fact, until 28, he had a NEP with rampant corruption and money-grubbing.
              1. +3
                2 March 2016 15: 45
                In fact, until 28, he had a NEP with rampant corruption and money-grubbing.


                And from the 31st or 32nd there was an accelerated industrialization and all the "revelry" worked honestly and conscientiously on the White Sea Canal.
                1. +4
                  2 March 2016 15: 52
                  Quote: alicante11
                  And from the 31st or 32nd there was accelerated industrialization

                  Exactly from the 28th, first year of the first five-year plan.
            2. +1
              2 March 2016 18: 16
              Well, it’s not entirely true, the capitalists were under 25, some 30 years old. During the time of the NEP, he already began to bend his fingers and eliminate the waste in the form of capitalism (oligarchs) in the USSR. The oligarchs in the USSR were different and the concept was different.
              1. +2
                3 March 2016 11: 45
                Not capitalists, but semi-private entrepreneurs. Artisans and cooperatives. Where there was a public form of ownership of the means of production. And they existed until the end of the 50s (until the crank Khrushch ruined this business ...) And they were under a vigilant eye of control financial authorities (KRU) and OBKhSS. And they were engaged in precisely that which after Khrushchev did not remain in the USSR. The service sector and small-scale production. So you don’t have to pull on Stalin. And by 1953 in the country problems were mainly solved with food, ITD, and other things that Gorbaty then gave out as his know-how ..
          3. 0
            5 March 2016 05: 29
            Quote: Pereira
            You will have to get up off your knees with very modest capital


            Stalin did not even have such modest capital. And nothing, managed.


            Believe on primary stage, in order to equalize the situation, it is not necessary to abruptly get up off one’s knees; one can land someone on a fat, fat ass.
            You can talk about Stalin for a long time, what he did, what he didn’t do ... He decided so that one person or clan could not use the benefits and resources that belong to the Constitution to all citizens.
        3. +11
          2 March 2016 14: 10
          Quote: Daniel
          a rational anti-crisis plan is, first of all, the creation of conditions for doing business. Ensuring equality of all before the law and the courts, supporting competition, combating corruption and arbitrariness at the local level, competent tax policy, ensuring access to cheap "long" money


          Iehhh ... It would seem so simple !!! But before graduates of the Higher School of Economics and similar institutions in power, this is an insoluble task ...

          PS Supporters of this point of view about the "extra" 80 million people - to the wall ... Without waiting for 2037 ...
          1. +3
            2 March 2016 15: 55
            Iehhh ... It would seem so simple !!! But before graduates of the Higher School of Economics and similar institutions in power, this is an insoluble task ...


            I am not a graduate of HSE. But I don’t understand either.
            The point is to create conditions for doing business if the economy is stupidly short of money. Any small business produces too little to ensure sustainable economic growth, and 90%, if not 99% of "small businesses" are "buy and sell", at most, stick a label. So they themselves perfectly create conditions, shifting ANY costs (whether it be tax bribes or the notorious "plato") on consumers. So once again I will ask what for to breed speculators, for the sake of a thousandth percent of growth? It is necessary to develop large enterprises, which is what we do. True, through the ass, i.e. through banks. But the banker is his own person - a capitalist, he also needs to be fed, and the consumer will pay where he goes, he wants to eat and dress, and sometimes pamper himself or his family too.

            Ensure the equality of all before the law and the court. How will this affect the development of the economy? The locomotives of the economy are large corporations that have such highly paid lawyers and such funds for bribery and such lobbying opportunities by which they will decide in their favor any legal proceedings. So for the development of the CAPITALIST economy, equality before the court is contraindicated. Nefig any small thing to get confused with locomotives under the wheels and nibble tidbits.
            1. +7
              2 March 2016 21: 58
              Quote: alicante11
              The meaning of creating the conditions for doing business,



              I started typing a response for you, and they cut off electricity ... Well, I didn’t blame GDP for that ... I just waited for it to turn on, thank God - it was not for long ...

              So what am I doing ... When I pulled out a quote from Daniela, I supported it, so to speak, on a global scale, and not purely for small business ...

              But with regards to medium and large enterprises ...

              In our city, over the past 12-15 years, 9 medium and large enterprises have been practically destroyed, the 10th, which used to be a city-forming one, is slowly losing its position very well (and before that it drove its high-tech products to many foreign countries) ...
              Of these, two large ones — state-owned, unitary, that is, state enterprises — are a chemical plant that produces gunpowder for artillery shells, and an experimental mechanical plant, which also once produced closed-type products ... Of the others, from the point of view of not only civilian, but also military, mobilization - the bakery is closed, and now bread is brought from different cities of the Tula region and even from Moscow ...

              So what kind of development of not small, but medium and large business are you talking about ???

              Nooo, I agree with you in theory, with your calculations ...
              But the problem is that our realities do not coincide with the theory ...

              What do you order with THIS ???

              PS And by the way: what to do with such "little things" when electricity is regularly cut off without warning, as well as hot and cold water ??? And it has become almost a daily, constant phenomenon ???

              There are so many problems that they can’t be discussed all ... One thing I can say - but this is purely my subjective opinion: the enemies of the people are at the top, and I mean, consider, even Stalinist, even modern ... And not only at the top, but also among small-town princes ...

              I don’t feel like scaring the revolution and civil war ... Then the question arises: how can all these problems be solved so that the state is strong and that it understands that without the people it is NOT a state ???
              1. 0
                2 March 2016 22: 25
                Quote: weksha50
                There are so many problems that they cannot be discussed ...

                So like Alexin afloat what
                Quote: weksha50
                I don’t feel like horror of revolution and civil war ...

                “We would perish if we did not perish,” the ancient commander Themistocles, the winner of the most powerful army of the ancient world, the Persian, once answered the grieving mothers and widows.
                1. +2
                  3 March 2016 10: 50
                  Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                  So like Alexin afloat



                  It is, as you say, "afloat" due to the fact that it is not so far from Moscow, which requires working hands ...

                  In order to feed the family, most of the working population, mainly young people (and not only young people), work in Moscow ... And you call this "afloat" ???

                  And after all, at VO we are talking not in particular about Aleksin, but about many such cities ... And what is happening in the towns in which all production is destroyed, and even far from the regional centers ???

                  And I emphasized the issue at the bakery and chemical plant, as key enterprises for defense and mobilization opportunities ... Here, just the other day, yesterday or the day before someone at VO caught a problem with gunpowder ... Who destroyed our production here ?? ? For what purpose ??? Who allowed ???

                  PS And nominally, after all, the chemical plant seems to exist, and continues to be a state-owned state enterprise ... Rogozin, AU !!!
                  1. 0
                    3 March 2016 11: 03
                    Quote: weksha50
                    He, as you say, "afloat"

                    you did not understand....
                    I was referring to other district centers.
                    In fact, I have an idea of ​​how things are in the region, they ditched, to hell, all that is possible and impossible.
                    In the regional center, things are not better, believe me.
                    Quote: weksha50
                    Rogozin, AU !!!

                    this person. cannot deal with Vostochny ... and you disturb the "greats" in trifles.
                    The system utilizes the country purposefully and mercilessly!
              2. +1
                3 March 2016 01: 30
                But with regards to medium and large enterprises ...


                Enterprises that no one needed are being bent. Which did not fit into the market. You can make very good buns with meat patties, which will be a thousand times better than the Big Mac, but the Big Mac will be sold in thousands, because it fits in, it is in demand. Also in the industry, in order to renew the production of the sample of the 80s, at best, funds are needed that will not pay off soon. At the same time, the sale of products is not ensured, since the Chinese are driving the same technological products much cheaper. In a capitalist economy, it makes no sense to keep this enterprise, it by itself will slowly go bankrupt. Money is invested where it is profitable - this is a capitalist axiom. Well, where they are invested, look at "doneunas".

                I don’t feel like frightening the revolution and civil war ... Then the question arises: how to solve all these problems so that the state is strong,


                But in a different way. Because the state is built on who has real power. Does the people have power now? No, the oligarchs have power, but for them the RF was created. And the state will protect their interests, not the interests of the people.
            2. +4
              2 March 2016 22: 54
              Just as streams, escaping from dusty mountains, merged into raging, frothy streams, just like at the first thunder of war the uprisings began in the Mountain Bourgeoisie, and thousands of angry voices came from the Plains Kingdom, the Snow Kingdom, and the Sultry State . And in fear the broken Chief Bourgeois fled, loudly cursing this country with its amazing people, with its invincible army and with its unsolved Military Secret.


              Is not it an amazing coincidence and foresight of all the events that our country plunged into, represented by A. Gaidar in full accordance with the realities of our time. After all, it is not for nothing that our tales are called “predictors” of the future.
              And in a very strange way, the fate of the Great Warrior for the liberation of the young Soviet republic and the "Great" destroyer of this state was linked together within the framework of one family.
              1. +2
                3 March 2016 11: 58
                Arkady Golikov (Gaidar) has nothing to do with this stub of Solomyansky. Please do not confuse.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. +2
              3 March 2016 09: 01
              Quote: alicante11
              The locomotives of the economy are large corporations that have such highly paid lawyers and such funds for bribery and such lobbying opportunities by which they will decide in their favor any legal proceedings. So for the development of the CAPITALIST economy, equality before the court is contraindicated.

              Large corporations can bribe any court. HENCE. Equality before the court, that is, justice, is contraindicated in a capitalist economy. Where is the logic here? Where is the following?
            5. +5
              3 March 2016 11: 53
              NOT enough money? Type it! And lend to the real sector of the economy, and don’t help bankers ... No need to support bankers. They are generally superfluous in this world ... One State Bank of Russia is enough. And a ruble secured by gold. Without any central banks and other trash and agents of the Federal Reserve. And the circulation of the ruble across the United States, prohibit)))))
              1. +1
                3 March 2016 15: 31
                The fact that bankers are superfluous in this world is already clear to everyone !!
                The exception is: the bankers themselves and those people in power to whom they unfasten.
              2. The comment was deleted.
            6. +2
              3 March 2016 12: 48
              That's how you do not understand, everything is the same, but about agriculture.
              Everyone whines and whines that it’s hard for a farmer to live, meaning by farms something up to 10 hectares. True, mostly those who did not leave the MKAD whined

              But 100% is proved that productivity at modern agricultural holdings is many times higher, and most importantly they are resistant to all sorts of accidents. Well, the chicken will not grow faster in the barn than at the modern poultry farm and following the path of the farms we will get an environmentally friendly elite, but VERY expensive product.
              And the fact that while it is not profitable to produce industrially, it is necessary to produce on a personal plot, but not 10 hectares, but 10 hectares. And do not call it farming, because the purpose of this is to get food for yourself and your family, and not to make a profit.
            7. +1
              3 March 2016 14: 42
              Quote: alicante11
              Large enterprises need to be developed, which is done with us. True, through the ass, i.e. through banks. But the banker is his own person - the capitalist, he also needs to be fed, and the consumer will pay where he gets to, he wants to eat and get dressed, and sometimes treat himself or his family too.

              They do not give their interest ...
              "Give not to your brother either silver, or bread, or anything else that can be given for growth; give it to a foreigner to increase, but give not to your brother to increase. (Deuteronomy 23:19)
              ... and you will lend to many nations, but you will not borrow and dominate many nations, but they will not dominate you. (Deuteronomy 28:12)
              When there is enough money, they do not borrow, and this is not good for "our" asses, ie. banks ...
              We are interested in banks as long as we have collateral assets, if there are no collateral, there are no loans. A non-creditworthy population is not interested in banks, namely, they manage the economy. As follows from the article, those who are not interesting, are gaining 80% in the Russian Federation, with which I cannot congratulate you either .. since this figure means that they already sucked us out by 80%.
            8. 0
              4 March 2016 02: 18
              Quote: alicante11
              The point is to create conditions for doing business if the economy is stupidly short of money. Any small business produces too little to ensure sustainable economic growth, and 90%, if not 99% of "small businesses" are "buy and sell", at most, stick a label.

              The modern economy that you are talking about, which is not able to exist without permanent growth, is likewise incapable of existing without serious crises and shocks, which, in the end, will necessarily result either in what is now called the "Great Depression" or in war ... This is a 99% usurious virtual economy that works exclusively for a narrow circle of people and those who attach themselves to them and does not imply uniform development everywhere. It should not be the dominant feature, which it is now, but only an instrument (damper) with very limited legal opportunities to provide support for the real economy.
              You are also wrong about small business. Small businesses are not just merchants. By the way, supplying you with a decent assortment of nishtyaks will not be able to exist normally if the number of intermediate links is less than 2: Manufacturer-> large wholesaler (so-called wholesalers) -> small wholesaler (stores) -> retail (consumers). Otherwise, it will be bad. Another thing is that all unnecessary intermediate links must be definitely cut off. So small business is not only speculators, it is also car services, small construction and design offices, small forges and other workshops, for example, for the manufacture of advertisements, various equipment, and so on and so forth. In general, what serves a private trader, i.e. and you as well. To give all this exclusively to large "hands" is stupid and will not lead to anything good. But the conditions for the development of such small businesses now are not just bad, but terrible, with draconian interest rates and a bunch of requirements that small ones simply cannot physically fulfill, without "quirks", often illegal.
          2. 0
            3 March 2016 18: 16
            The population should be planned (as well as the economy) and stimulated to increase or decrease as necessary, and the expectation of a new 37 year ... the wrong decision, there is nothing to wait for, as such statements are easily summed up under the law, all the same call for mass genocide! hi
        4. +4
          2 March 2016 15: 13
          Quote: Daniel
          No, a rational anti-crisis plan is, first and foremost, the creation of conditions for doing business.

          I’m only interested in one thing: who will do what?
          Hoping for an entrepreneurial revival of industry is a utopia, it is easier to resell than bother with production, search for markets and other related headaches.
        5. +1
          2 March 2016 20: 49
          Quote: Daniel
          First you need to open any textbook on economic theory, find in the text the questions "What? How? And For whom?" produce and respond to them. Honestly and impartially. And then to invest something somewhere.

          Reasonable.
          Quote: Daniel
          a rational anti-crisis plan is, first of all, the creation of conditions for doing business. Ensuring equality of all before the law and the courts, supporting competition, combating corruption and arbitrariness at the local level, competent tax policy, ensuring access to cheap "long" money (this will be difficult), openness and predictability of government bodies, etc.

          Creation of specific conditions for business, maybe in more detail?
          Before the law and so on, everyone is equal, who has not arrived, welcome to the criminal court, what’s wrong? but there and there are people, so to whom, what and how, to ensure before the court?
          And what methods of support, "what" competitors, can you tell? and they can't put jam on their nose.
          What pompous words "fight against corruption" I wonder who should do it? The government, another committee, the police, the inspection))) and who will work there so honest? Against who? just as honest?
          Literate, correct, reasonable, etc., easier said than understood and done, right?
          Cheap money is nothing complicated for those who are busy with business.
          Openness and predictability, foreign and liberal media write such a thing for you, you don’t recognize your relatives, not like the government.
          Quote: Daniel
          And certainly no "mask shows" on the territory of neighboring states and similar shocks

          The State Department was the first to arrange masks for the show, firstly, and secondly, in addition to internal problems, there are external ones, which are sometimes a hundred times more important and without solving them, you can endlessly solve internal problems.
          Quote: Daniel
          money love silence.

          That's right, and not the cries of revolutionary preoccupied bolabol and fools.
        6. +4
          2 March 2016 22: 09
          Interesting personalities instead of young specialists, you aptly noticed it. Despite what university this very specialist graduated from, he imagines himself to be super genius, and strives to manage .. Only there is no sense from them .. managers / effective managers 0 without a stick. In the minds, it is necessary to invest not only knowledge, but also to set the direction in the direction of the country's development, and not the thirst for the consumption of burgers and iPhones.
      2. +2
        2 March 2016 11: 28
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        a full and calm life ... how boring it is! wassat

        ...But why? I ate, rested ...- and pulled the thread ... what the thread! ... so that the dust and smoke!
        Tired - have a snack, rest ... well-fed and calm ... a couple of hours ... days ... and - pulled the thread ... Well, I will not repeat!
    3. +17
      2 March 2016 08: 03
      Quote: Sensatus
      Yes, the principle "everything that does not kill us makes us stronger" cannot be canceled

      So they say: "What does not kill us,
      It makes it stronger .. "
      Well, how to say .. I don’t know ..
      I'm tired every time to be stronger
      Better get the fuck out right away! bully
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +56
        2 March 2016 08: 41
        The existence of 80% of officials and top managers is inappropriate for the Russians.
      3. +5
        2 March 2016 11: 29
        Really.
        The Kursk Bulge and Operation Bagration did not kill Nazi Germany. But they didn’t do it anymore.
        So stupid is the saying.
        1. +1
          2 March 2016 19: 30
          Pereira RU Today, 11:29 ↑
          Really.
          The Kursk Bulge and Operation Bagration did not kill Nazi Germany. But they didn’t do it anymore.
          So stupid is the saying


          The Kursk Bulge killed Nazi Germany and paved the way for Germany today. In 2015, Germany exported goods worth 1400 billion euros. record. having no gas, oil, ore ... almost no raw materials.
          1. +2
            2 March 2016 19: 47
            recovering - $ 1500 billion.
            For comparison: Russia - 500, Sadovaya Arabia - 350.
      4. +5
        2 March 2016 14: 17
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Better get the fuck out right away!


        It was also reminded of an old joke ... On the topic of how a Georgian was accepted into the party (CPSU, of course) ...
        To all the questions about what hardships he was ready for in the name of the victory of communism, he answered: "Of course, I am ready" ... To the last question - is he ready to give his life in the name of this victory, he also answered that - of course, he is ready ... Adding: "And what a fig such a life gave up to me" ...
      5. +1
        2 March 2016 14: 45
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        I'm tired every time to be stronger

        Better end without torment than torment without end
      6. +1
        3 March 2016 12: 00
        What does not kill us does not kill us! I-point! Everything else is insinuations))))))))
    4. 0
      2 March 2016 08: 44
      The existence of 80% Russians inappropriate for the economy

      Here is the one who wrote this, let him start with himself. Is there soap with a rope? fool
      1. -6
        2 March 2016 09: 48
        "All the rest are extra ballast hanging like a stone around the neck of Rosneft - Something new, but that we already have the entire population around Rosneft's neck and there is only one company left in the country? Or are numerous shareholders of this company a stone for it? ? - from the article carries a paranoid delusional.
        1. +14
          2 March 2016 10: 27
          Quote: Vadim237
          Something new, but that we have the entire population sitting on the neck of Rosneft and there is only one firm left in the country?

          You understood everything literally, who is at the head of Rosneft - Sechin, who is Sechin - a friend and colleague, you know who, what the man, whose name cannot be named - said, “I don’t abandon my own people,” so who’s doing it?
          1. +3
            2 March 2016 10: 49
            Quote: sa-ag
            what did the man, whose name cannot be named, said - “I don’t abandon mine,” so who does it work on his neck?

            Enough for you! The golden age of oil and gas monopolies, in connection with the collapse in hydrocarbon prices, has sunk into oblivion. As well as their influence on Russian politics. Now the main promising fillers of the state budget are gradually becoming the defense industry and agrarians. But they need the people — alone, like workers; to others, like consumers. In this regard, I have an optimistic outlook on the current situation. The main thing is that Western sanctions last longer.
            1. +2
              3 March 2016 14: 54
              Igor Sechin, head of Rosneft - salary 6 million 85 thousand rubles in a day... in connection with the collapse of hydrocarbon prices ... A parallel world!
              http://www.informdetox.com/?p=11410
          2. -2
            2 March 2016 11: 04
            It's time to choose between nightingale and laying hen. Either saved savings in an American bank, or let empty projects that are not executed.
      2. +1
        2 March 2016 11: 31
        Perhaps he secretly dreams of taking their place.
      3. +9
        2 March 2016 20: 56
        You ask "who wrote?
        His learner and follower.

        And in order to really get out of the existing pit, it is necessary to make all strategic sectors state-owned, as well as abandon the idea that the farmer will feed the state. Food security is too serious a thing. No agricultural holdings will save. It is necessary to revive collective farms without rotting, while the farmer and private trader - everyone will find their own niche.
        They cry that there are no funds — which hinders the introduction of a state monopoly on alcohol and tobacco. Under the tsar, an army was kept for this.
        1. 0
          3 March 2016 18: 23
          I am not calling for anything, but would it not be more humane to "ground" this "figure"?
      4. +1
        3 March 2016 09: 07
        Quote: GSH-18
        The existence of 80% Russians inappropriate for the economy
        Here is the one who wrote this, let him start with himself. Is there soap with a rope?

        It is written so that you think, and not so that you self-deny.
    5. +35
      2 March 2016 08: 50
      Quote: Sensatus
      But this well-founded principle does not promise a well-fed calm life.


      The point is not a well-fed and calm life, the point is that practically throughout the country there are problems with the employment of people in general, and young people without experience in particular. I do not mean Moscow, St. Petersburg and other large cities with a population of over one million or so. Young people cannot find work; earnings of 10-12 tons of rubles cannot be called work, and besides, not formalized. Everyone survives as best they can, someone kalym, and someone is drunk, someone sits on the neck of relatives, well, etc. We, I already wrote about this, had an industrial city, produced both civilian and defense products. Our refrigerators were in great demand, they served for more than 30 years the brand "Orsk", many people know, and where is the whole industry, almost everything was ruined, some show-off - innovations, innovations. I'm not talking about agriculture. I will not go further, one hassle.
      1. +24
        2 March 2016 09: 38
        I will add. No one from St. Petersburg or Moscow rushes to the North, the Urals or the Far East. A lot of money, as in the USSR, is no longer paid, the profit goes exactly to Moscow and goes away. The exception is "talented managers", whose task for a good salary at any cost (reductions with replacement of personnel for guest workers (such as optimization), saving on everything with violations of safety regulations, etc.) fill the owner's pocket and then quietly slip back.
        1. +12
          2 March 2016 10: 45
          yours is not true. I’ll tell you in my surroundings that half of my classmates at Dikson School now work in the Arctic, i.e. already in adulthood they returned there from where their parents took them in the early 90's. there are guys who left for the regions to the village - who is doing better, someone is worse. in general, a lot of examples. no need to say so categorically. the trouble of the locals is that they talk more in the kitchen, but they themselves do not want to do anything, although they can! A simple example is our village in Novgorod. 3 years ago I bought a house there. There is no road. Only a boat crossing. sit whining. and in the forest to the asphalt is only 12 km. the men’s chainsaws were quiet and hunsvarna (I still can’t afford) ... and so, we cut into two fields, drove through. business then - to sort a couple of blockages, throw a couple of gates. and here is the result - now in the village there are 3 less abandoned houses. They threw one car there permanently ... pensioners-summer residents cheered up. The guys are going to start livestock ... in general, they are locals, they stay home, especially nobody wants to move! everyone is waiting for someone to do something for them. only talk that they say St. Petersburg sleeping on the dough. and you try to live in St. Petersburg for a start, and then sharpen your hair! .. that’s the whole story.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +3
            2 March 2016 12: 03
            Personally, I will tell you that I lived in Leningrad (+ oblast) for almost 12 years (a hostel, a barracks, a rented apartment). I had to return to the 99th home (crisis 1998). But we do not have villages, but industrial cities. And what is happening throughout the country is a solid reality.
          3. +9
            2 March 2016 14: 34
            Quote: Ivan Tucha
            yours is not true. I’ll answer you in my surroundings,


            Yes, both of you are right in your way ...
            Unfortunately, the modern village (as workers) died out as a fact ...
            And where there are strong households (fortunately, there are such), people are happy to work, and some people leave the city for a permanent residence ...

            But there are very few such people, these are grains of sand in the desert ...

            And, unfortunately, local officials have forgotten about their main goal and responsibilities according to the Law on Local Self-Government (and everything is spelled out there), and they are only concerned with stuffing their money ...

            This was lucky for you - they cut down the trees, cleared the rubble, made at least some way ... But you could run into the local princes - and on what basis? Who allowed? Illegal logging was arranged ... etc., etc.

            There are a great many problems in our country, but a significant part of local problems could be solved (and needed) by joint local efforts and work, rather than talking in the kitchen ...
          4. +1
            2 March 2016 16: 54
            In St. Petersburg, 10 times less money and 2 times less salary, when compared with Moscow. There are no super-salaries.
          5. +2
            2 March 2016 21: 10
            Quote: Ivan Tucha
            -Hacked-drove. business then

            Initiative +. Especially if the felling was executed according to the current rules, with a logging ticket .... or you won’t get into trouble, no matter what
            Quote: Ivan Tucha
            dismantle a couple of blockages, throw a couple of gates

            to clear the clearing under power lines Yes
            the less production, the more bureaucrats recourse
        2. +11
          2 March 2016 14: 27
          None of St. Petersburg or Moscow is eager for the North, beyond the Urals or the Far East.


          Yes, your Muscovites and Petersburgers in the Far East have already got it. If we were going to work, so "welcom". And then they are going to occupy leadership positions. The company will be privatized or squeezed out of the local business and put the Moscow Varangians, who buy or rent an apartment, move the payment, they do not know the realities of the Far East and do not want to know, and only look to steal and dump back. What kind of development can we talk about?
          1. +1
            2 March 2016 15: 46
            Not having understood. And here are mine?
      2. +6
        2 March 2016 09: 47
        Yes, "Orsk" worked for 40 years - in 1968 it was bought. And if not for the rubber seal, it probably would still work. Well, the capacity, of course, is too small for these days, when you want to freeze more cherries and currants ...
        1. +11
          2 March 2016 14: 37
          Quote: satris
          Yes, "Orsk" worked for 40 years - in 1968 it was bought. And if not for the rubber seal,


          !!! Exactly !
          But the relay and the engine have been working for decades ... And there’s nothing more to break ...
          And where are our, Russian, refrigerators, now ???
          And anyway - where are our nails-irons-bicycles-dishes-and much more ???

          Instead of restoring the ruined one, only talk about the dollar-euro exchange rate and the price of oil ...
      3. +14
        2 March 2016 12: 23
        I agree with you, in our city the same thing ... Regarding the products of one of our plants, ZiM. In Ethiopia, my watch of this brand was exchanged for 3-pont electronic (86 g.) The mechanisms of our watches were very much appreciated for the accuracy of the movement, they were put in branded watches. And now yes, they say a lot, rightly, with a twinkle in their eyes, and as a result of spent billions, a wretched e-book is three times more expensive than the most fig imported and kind smile with an oil in his eye. That's the whole point of innovation.
        1. +2
          2 March 2016 18: 28
          I agree. We have a radio tube plant in Kaluga. Under the USSR, we had about 5 enterprises in total. Now he is left alone. They promised to load the plant with contracts, as they said that year, there would be no large orders due to the crisis. The people have partially reduced. It produces radio electronics for rockets and other equipment.
          1. +1
            3 March 2016 15: 09
            Quote: valek97
            I agree. We have a radio tube plant in Kaluga. Under the USSR, we had about 5 enterprises in total. Now he is left alone. They promised to load the plant with contracts, as they said that year, there would be no large orders due to the crisis. The people have partially reduced. It produces radio electronics for rockets and other equipment.


            Competitive wars have been and will be. Competitors are either destroyed or bought up. The USSR was thus destroyed and bought up ... HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of enterprises! Read Confessions of an Economic Killer by John Perkins. As the saying goes: "Better late than never."
      4. +2
        2 March 2016 14: 22
        It’s not a matter of a well-fed and calm life, the fact is that practically throughout the country there are problems with the employment of people in general, and young people without experience in particular.


        It's just that. February 16 conducted the distribution of graduates. My locomotives. They are offered to go to BAM to begin with as assistant drivers, after a year or two drivers, there is an option to become a driver-instructor. Lifting 250tys, salary 40-50 thousand, mortgage at 2%, but for now compensation for half of rented housing, targeted for correspondence. And, damn it, wander. We want in Khabarovsk where half of the assistant drivers with higher education ride. If you want to earn, you will earn. If you want to sit on the couch, then no spending of reserve funds will help.
        1. +10
          3 March 2016 09: 03
          alicante11(6)SU

          . And, damn it, wander. We want in Khabarovsk where half of the assistant drivers with higher education ride. If you want to earn, you will earn.


          The ideology disappeared, and with it the distant goal. Everyone needs "everything and now". There were no enthusiasts for whom the long-range end result was important and who could organize the work and captivate its teams.
          That's what youth is officially preparing for

          And here is how they treated this issue during the heyday of the USSR


          And now, dear ones, answer:
          Is this comrade right or wrong

          Here are the reasons and the plan and the means to get out of this situation. Only skillfully apply the previously accumulated experience and prevent managers from getting stuck and rest on their laurels, which already led to 1991.
    6. +5
      2 March 2016 11: 32
      But this well-founded principle does not promise a well-fed calm life. ,,
      and now you need to understand and well-fed and calm. But just who?
      1. +1
        2 March 2016 15: 41
        But this well-founded principle does not promise a well-fed calm life. ,,
        and now you need to understand and well-fed and calm. But just who?


        With regard to my studios - quite. Dad and mom have to sit around their necks for another twenty years, working as a "manager" in the nearest boutique for a penny. And full and calm.
    7. +1
      2 March 2016 20: 36
      Quote: Sensatus
      Yes, the principle "everything that does not kill us makes us stronger" cannot be canceled. But this principle does not promise a well-fed, quiet life.


      There are also other principles: "Whoever got up first, that and the slippers" request "A rolling stone gathers no moss " Yes

      State Duma deputy (“Fair Russia” faction) Oleg Pakholkov sent an appeal to the head of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Alexei Ulyukayev to consider the possibility of completely stopping the sale of oil abroad within five years.

      Really, it has only now become to them, it seems, how to reach ??? !!!! request Even to me, with my freelance economic technician (and without him, too) and the specialty of a locksmith, it was generally clear where the steam locomotive would go, according to the rails. request
      I admit, in my very head such pink fantasies roamed for a long time feel Something like this: at least at the turn of 2010 to accept the program, conditionally call it "minus ten %%", i.e. ALL raw materials, not only the oil industry, companies (ideally, of course), according to the results of the past period, receive a conditional quota for the export of unprocessed / low-processed raw materials. Every year, this quota will be reduced by about 10 %%. Do you want to stay on the market ??? !!! what Actively invest in deep processing, or fail !!! fellow
      there are many nuances and moments Yes but I would like something like that hi

      Here's another, twin article, about the problems of the American "economy", there are also a lot of books, who copied from whom, I can not judge, but the situation is practically the same. Only we are sitting on a raw material needle, and they are on financial (the same kind of raw materials) while removing a huge part of GDP from their economies, in pursuit of the earliest superprofits hi

      http://finobzor.ru/show-7284-dve-veschi-kotorye-ubili-amerikanskuyu-ekonomiku.ht
      ml
      1. +1
        4 March 2016 02: 24
        Quote: demon1978
        State Duma deputy (“Fair Russia” faction) Oleg Pakholkov sent an appeal to the head of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Alexei Ulyukayev to consider the possibility of completely stopping the sale of oil abroad within five years.
        Really, it has only now become to them, it seems, how to reach ??? !!!!

        When is our election there?
        According to the statements and slogans, which tatupeds and other politicians are screaming and publicizing before the elections (ahead of time), one can understand the public mood. In America and Europe, the same thing.
        To paraphrase: just PR, nothing personal.
        1. +1
          4 March 2016 17: 35
          Quote: aleksey980
          To paraphrase: just PR, nothing personal.



          If you rephrase again: Our whole life is PR ?? !!
          Great message for politicians !!!!
    8. +2
      3 March 2016 08: 57
      The whole liberal establishment wants a well-fed and peaceful life, and we interfere with them. In general, the worse the better. I am grateful to the amers for the sanctions, may they be eternal, and if Putin does not change the government and the country's development course, the electoral mass will wake up and replace it. Only hardships make us unite and understand that we are all people, not cattle.
    9. 0
      3 March 2016 09: 40
      And that's true. I agree to starve, but someone does not understand this.
  2. +42
    2 March 2016 06: 31
    Very controversial article. But a plus set. In the USSR, only 10% of the budget was received from oil, but today? It is necessary to return production ... Stop being a raw materials appendage
    1. +3
      2 March 2016 07: 23
      Quote: domokl
      Very controversial article. But a plus set. In the USSR, only 10% of the budget was received from oil, but today? It is necessary to return production ... Stop being a raw materials appendage

      Sasha! hi in the USSR,% of the budget from the sale of alcohol was believed to be almost 30 !!! wink
      1. +32
        2 March 2016 08: 41
        If you throw away all the screen lies, then the bottom line is that the current president is firmly pursuing an Ebnov policy.
        The ebn fulfilled its function according to the breakdown of the Soviet regime and the integration relations of the republics, and its successor has already consolidated and built a new system, while preserving and multiplying the interests of those who were at the forefront of destruction.
        Once, at the beginning of his activity, Yegor Gaidar publicly stated that "let 60 million pensioners die out and Russia will become a small prosperous country like Switzerland." This statement is absolutely cynical and completely illiterate - there were no 60 million pensioners in Russia at that time, and even now there are not so many, but nevertheless, his promise has been steadily fulfilled not only for pensioners, but for all Russian citizens who have reached the age of 18: from the beginning of their activity Russian liberals to destroy communism and hammer, according to Chubais, nails in his coffin, the Russian population annually loses and loses hundreds of thousands of lives beyond their natural mortality.
        All reforms in health care, education, tax policy indicate genocide.
        Here one can recall Dulles's plan, which closely echoes Hitler's Ost plan, and Margaret Thatcher's words about extra souls.
        It must be clearly understood that a colonial economy cannot exist without colonial laws, and population regulation in the colonies is one of them.
        "Straight talk with Russia" http://viktor-iluhin.ru/node/63, chapter "Court and Justice".
        Read in full: http://yablor.ru/blogs/net-nichego-strashnogo-esli-chast-pensionerov-vimr/279516

        5
        1. +13
          2 March 2016 14: 28
          Again, the increase in excise taxes on gasoline, diesel fuel, vodka, cigarettes, the proposal of lobbyists to replace all cash registers in 2017, the Platon system, the EGAIS system, mad interest on loans, an increase in the number of officials (after some reorganizations and optimizations, their number increases in several times, where 2 people worked, 9-10 incompetent "young" began to "work"), the proposal of the Ministry of Labor to release the prices for cheap drugs to 50 rubles (stop producing, it is unprofitable). etc. etc. And the view of our guarantor - "... our economy will remain LIBERAL and EVERYTHING IS CLOSED." Again, everyone is fighting with the consumer, because it is difficult to find REAL PROFESSIONALS in the government (and are they looking for them at all?)
      2. +35
        2 March 2016 08: 47
        Zadolbali !!!!
        Is it really that bullshit that was hammered into your heads under the name "ECONOMY" with strange "laws" that work only for a certain circle of people, so firmly stuck in the minds ??? It is high time to understand that the rules of the game are tailored for specific people and if something goes wrong, the rules are changed by them.
        We live in a SELF-SUFFICIENT country. By and large, we ourselves can develop very well. And we don't need "financial injections".
        After the country was plunged into perestroika, this "sabbath" continues to this day. We were initially set the conditions for us to degrade. Look, in our country it makes no sense to engage in production, scientific activities, they kill us for what year education (they kill very competently), medicine, production, scientific centers. Why? Yes, because in the government there are TRAITORS and ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE. Because there are no tough decisions on this matter. Judges - for the most part venal or under the influence - act as a tool for unpunished lawlessness. What's far to go? Here, the GDP recently issued that "our economy will remain LIBERAL and EVERYTHING IS CLOSED." Do you seriously think that this is a reasonable person? And how can you even call him a man after that?
        Today, we are on the verge of a great war, NATO has already approached our borders directly from all sides, provocations will soon begin. If they get into us, it will be a TOTAL annihilation of everyone and everything. Therefore, you need to understand what awaits us and accordingly respond to it.
        There is still the opportunity to prevent a war, if you do not allow unrest to stir up within the country, to make it strong and strong. And for this you need to do a lot of things. It is only visible that everything is only getting worse.
        For a long time I do not believe what certain politicians tell us from the zombie man. These are dolls. Now God is money. Everything is possible for money. Even betray. Everything is very simple.
        1. +4
          2 March 2016 09: 25
          So, the GDP recently issued that "our economy will remain LIBERAL and EVERYTHING IS CLOSED"

          Today, we are on the verge of a great war, NATO has already approached our borders directly from all sides, provocations will soon begin.

          Question: What is the purpose of the war? Russia does not have its own economy, it is completely, at the moment, a dependent country.
          There is still the opportunity to prevent a war, if you do not allow unrest to stir up within the country, to make it strong and strong.

          Who is trying to swing?
          For a long time I do not believe what certain politicians tell us from the zombie man. These are dolls. Now God is money. Everything is possible for money. Even betray. Everything is very simple.

          But you can't argue with that. Valentin Katasonov "The Religion of Money"
          1. +1
            2 March 2016 14: 30
            Question: What is the purpose of the war? Russia does not have its own economy, it is completely, at the moment, a dependent country.


            The purpose of the war is to integrate into the world economy, to get its own niche in it. The day is clear - which is raw. But even our oligarchs are not allowed there.
        2. +11
          2 March 2016 09: 53
          Is it really that bullshit that was hammered into your heads under the name "ECONOMY" with strange "laws" that work only for a certain circle of people, so firmly stuck in the minds ??? It is high time to understand that the rules of the game are tailored for specific people and if something goes wrong, the rules are changed by them.

          Settled so tight, most do not understand the difference between finance and the economy.
          It is strange that the amount of potatoes in the cellar. in kilograms they count, not in rubles. They would try in rubles and ocher ..... they would do nothing, but the quantity changes.
          1. +3
            2 March 2016 15: 44
            They would try in rubles and ocher ..... they would do nothing, but the quantity changes.


            It’s even worse, you take potatoes for soup, and tomorrow it’s getting bigger in money.
            But only when it ends, then you will die of hunger ... a billionaire.
        3. +3
          2 March 2016 11: 34
          It is a pity that our army is also the same corrupt, and so could, would have carried out a coup in favor of Russia. No maidan and a minimum of blood.
          1. +5
            2 March 2016 14: 57
            Quote: varov14
            It is a pity that our army is also the same corrupt, and so could, would have carried out a coup in favor of Russia.



            The army itself is not corrupt ... But here at the key posts are persons selected according to some clan attributes and qualities ...

            And, in general, this does not at all contradict the doctrine of the same Plato "On the State" ...
            Power structures serve to maintain the existing power and foundations of the state. And they educate the leaders of these structures, and promote them precisely, given this point of view.

            And what is a state ??? Cynically speaking, this apparatus is not so much the government of the country and the people inhabiting its territory, but the apparatus-mechanism of oppression of this people, maintaining the herd within the framework and boundaries that are necessary for the existence of this state ...

            And it is simply impossible to talk about the venality of lower officers and other military personnel, they are the same people from the people, moreover, who piously believe in this oath and in the need to protect NOT the "elite", namely the country and its people ...
        4. +1
          2 March 2016 11: 59
          Quote: PHANTOM-AS
          If you throw away all the screen lies, then the bottom line is that the current president is firmly pursuing an Ebnov policy.
          The ebn fulfilled its function according to the breakdown of the Soviet regime and the integration relations of the republics, and its successor has already consolidated and built a new system, while preserving and multiplying the interests of those who were at the forefront of destruction.

          Who, when and to whom said that Putin is a social state, is trying to recreate USSR-2.0 ... and so on?
          He is a Westerner and a liberal, absolutely normal and adequate; and he builds capitalist Russia!And the "Crimea" there and Syria ... Turkey and so on and so forth - because the "big three", or seven, or nine there - whatever you call it: the guys who did not divide the world - do not accept Russia in their "game", in "team", leaving not even on the sidelines (not to serve the ball kicked off the field ...) and the "server" - sandwiches and Coca-Cola in time-out! And who is unhappy - the examples of Milosevic, Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein and ... and ... and ... (there will be examples!) Let him inspire!
          The direction of the West's global policy is the destruction of Russia, Putin may be left without a country - in which he is president! The boy allowed himself to disagree - in connection with the events in: - Georgia, - Kazakhstan, - Ukraine, - Moldova ... - Syria, - Iran, - Iraq ... well, then everyone knows, the list is decent! And - he scolded the wand! declared about himself and about the country - that they are worthy, and - maybe even more! - to be equal in the world community, in "threes", "sevens" and "nines"! But no - "more different" "trading dozen", "defense twenty" and "hundreds of any mutual assistance" will be created ...
          ... To what it all goes! The Western world, periodically changing its relations with Russia in the range from "partnership" to "main enemy" - today, albeit indirectly - but has to reckon with both the country of Russia and Putin!
          ... And social policy ... What is the president of even the richest and largest country without its people? inhabiting this country ... Apocalyptic dreams of "60%" and "80%" which should "quietly die out" - it is better to leave "black science fiction writers" ...
          ----
          I think the next "round" of positive capitalization "in Russia is the" reform "of the Unified State Exam (until it is completely canceled ...) and medicine - well, here at the discretion of social fantasy ...
          1. +4
            2 March 2016 15: 04
            Quote: CONTROL
            Who, when and to whom said Putin is a social state,


            Hmm ... First of all, he (earlier !!!) has repeatedly stated this himself ... True, he has not spoken about this recently ...

            Secondly, it is clearly spelled out in the Constitution ...

            This is, as it were, in defense of GDP ...

            Only recently I often look at the Constitution of the Russian Federation, compare it with realities, and I see clearly how inexorably, dynamically all the canons of a social state are crumbling ... Although on paper (it’s a sin, of course, to call the Constitution this way - the main Law of the country) they still allegedly remain in priority ...
          2. 0
            2 March 2016 18: 22
            Quote: CONTROL
            Who, when and to whom said that Putin is a social state, is trying to recreate USSR-2.0 ... and so on?

            Madame Clinton for some reason believes in it
        5. +1
          3 March 2016 14: 31
          The course of your judgment appeals to me. I would like to add, while the current * elite * is in power, no import substitution, propaganda of patriotism, raising oil prices will radically change the situation in Russia. Https: //pp.vk.me/c625831/v625831118/4cf07/2Ba6il_0va8.jpg
      3. +21
        2 March 2016 09: 47
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        in the USSR,% of the budget from the sale of alcohol was believed to be almost 30 !!!


        We look at the Internet budget of the USSR. About 400 billion rubles. 30% of this = 120 billion rubles.
        Divide the entire population of the USSR (including infants!) 250mln.
        We receive 480rub. per person Divide by 4p. (price of a bottle of vodka 2,87 then 3,62 then 4,12, etc.) We get 120 bottles.

        Those. it turns out that every resident of the USSR (including women and infants) consumed 120 bottles of vodka per year! Those. 1 bottle every 3 of the day.

        I do not remember that I or any of my relatives and friends consumed vodka in such quantities. Breast babies clearly did not drink at all wink

        So about 30% of the sale of alcohol is a myth, it is not clear who created it and it is not clear why it is being distributed.
        1. +1
          2 March 2016 11: 08
          Quote: Pawel1626
          Those. it turns out that every resident of the USSR (including women and infants) consumed 120 bottles of vodka per year! Those. 1 bottle every 3 days. I do not remember that I or any of my relatives and friends consumed vodka in such quantities. Breast babies clearly did not drink at all

          Why? These are absolutely official numbers. Conditional alcohol, all alcohol-containing drinks were included there
          By the end of the 1970s, the consumption of alcoholic beverages in the USSR reached a record level in the history of the country. Alcohol consumption, which did not exceed 5 liters per person per year, either in the Russian Empire or in the Stalin era [5], reached 1984 by 10,5 liters of registered alcohol, and taking into account the underground moonshining could exceed 14 liters. According to estimates, this level of consumption was equivalent to about 90-110 bottles of vodka per year for every adult man, excluding a small number of teetotalers [6] (vodka itself was about ⅓ of this volume. The rest of the alcohol was consumed in the form of moonshine, wine and beer [7] )
          1. +10
            2 March 2016 12: 35
            Quote: atalef
            Why? These are absolutely official numbers. Conditional alcohol, all alcohol-containing drinks were included there

            Atalef, do not smack nonsense!
            Should you have leftovers of common sense ...
            If you count on port, then there are 200 bottles a year, for "worm", so in general 450.
            In total, a family of 4 people per year must consume either 480 bottles of vodka, or 800 bottles of port or 1800 (!) Bottles of "worm".
            Will we recount beer and kefir?
            1. +6
              2 March 2016 12: 37
              Quote: Wheel
              Atalef, do not smack nonsense!

              Stirlitz smashed the bullshit - bullshit joyfully screeched lol
            2. +3
              2 March 2016 13: 00
              Quote: Wheel
              Atalef, do not smack nonsense!

              Why feel sorry for them? Bullshit, I mean
              Quote: Wheel
              If you count for port, then 200 bottles per year are produced, for a "worm", so in general 450. So, a family of 4 people a year must consume either 480 bottles of vodka, or 800 bottles of port or 1800 (!) Bottles of "worm".

              Let’s not convert billions of tons of conditional kefir, the figures are official, no one doubted.
              Do not agree - submit your official statistics.
              And starting to translate from the approach — my neighbors didn’t drink — is ridiculous.
              For example, I and my wife absolutely do not drink privos, so now? Nobody drinks it?
              1. +7
                2 March 2016 13: 29
                Quote: atalef
                Why feel sorry for them? Bullshit, I mean

                Hmm, with the remnants of common sense, well, quite tight ....
                Quote: atalef
                Do not agree - submit your official statistics.

                "If you read the inscription" buffalo "on an elephant's cage, do not believe your eyes."
                / K.Prutkov/
                Let's take a completely official picture of alcohol consumption in the USSR / Russia

                take the most alcohol-consuming year -1980, as much as 10,8 liters of absolute alcohol per year per capita. This is 27 bottles of vodka, if Che.
                We carry out the reverse calculation - a year the population spent 27 billion rubles on alcohol, we will put on brandy and fine wines, let it be 30 billion. Payments to the budget, well, let it be 70%, i.e. 21 billion.
                Budget - 400 billion.
                Do you calculate the interest?
                Quote: atalef
                And starting to translate from the approach — my neighbors didn’t drink — is ridiculous.
                For example, I and my wife absolutely do not drink privos, so now? Nobody drinks it?

                All the same, with common sense you are a little taut ...
                My recounts in bottles simply show that you can't drink so much with all your desire, especially since you yourself noted that not all of them "used maliciously".
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. 0
                  2 March 2016 13: 51
                  Quote: Wheel
                  "If you read the inscription" buffalo "on an elephant's cage, do not believe your eyes." / K. Prutkov /

                  And sure. what exactly zanete what they look like?

                  Quote: Wheel
                  My recounts in bottles simply show that you can't drink so much with all your desire, especially since you yourself noted that not everyone "was maliciously using

                  Your calculations are not worth anything.
                  There are official statistics cited by me, if you do not agree - bring your own.
                  And my calculations - your calculations - have nothing to do with reality and are based only on personal feelings.
                  Tk, tell you that if you look at how they drank at a wood processing plant in the Pskov Region (where I worked as the head of the workshop, a year and a half), the statistics certainly lie - they drink more, and my friend, who works as a psychiatrist, is sure that there are crazy people around .
                  So let's talk about the official numbers.
                  Quote: Wheel
                  All the same, with common sense you are a little taut ...


                  And try without quick conclusions.
                  Both in one and in the other.
                  1. -1
                    3 March 2016 07: 04
                    Quote: atalef
                    There are official statistics cited by me, if you do not agree - give your ..

                    ... there is a lie, a shameless lie and - official statistics!
                    But let's not forget about psychology, gentlemen! ...
            3. +3
              2 March 2016 14: 01
              ..... If you count on port, then ...

              ... laughing ..... You still count on lemonade .... Do not forget that the industry also consumed alcohol and very large volumes .... hi
          2. 0
            2 March 2016 16: 59
            Yes, this is all nonsense. Even drunks never drank so much. In the USSR, drinkers drank a couple of bottles of vodka on weekends. Try a drink in the week - immediately a detoxifier, or even get fired from work.
        2. +1
          2 March 2016 11: 08
          Quote: Pawel1626
          Those. it turns out that every resident of the USSR (including women and infants) consumed 120 bottles of vodka per year! Those. 1 bottle every 3 days. I do not remember that I or any of my relatives and friends consumed vodka in such quantities. Breast babies clearly did not drink at all

          Why? These are absolutely official numbers. Conditional alcohol, all alcohol-containing drinks were included there
          By the end of the 1970s, the consumption of alcoholic beverages in the USSR reached a record level in the history of the country. Alcohol consumption, which did not exceed 5 liters per person per year, either in the Russian Empire or in the Stalin era [5], reached 1984 by 10,5 liters of registered alcohol, and taking into account the underground moonshining could exceed 14 liters. According to estimates, this level of consumption was equivalent to about 90-110 bottles of vodka per year for every adult man, excluding a small number of teetotalers [6] (vodka itself was about ⅓ of this volume. The rest of the alcohol was consumed in the form of moonshine, wine and beer [7] )
          1. +3
            2 March 2016 17: 05
            Quote: atalef
            all alcohol-containing drinks

            Not drinks, but liquids. And alcohol was used in industry very widely. The prime cost of a liter of technical ethyl alcohol was 1,5 kopecks per liter, of food about 4 kopecks.
          2. +1
            3 March 2016 15: 30
            The conclusion suggests itself ...
            USSR drank !!!
            And what about the statistics of this case in the Russian Federation now?
            "Gift to the studio ..."
        3. +4
          2 March 2016 14: 59
          Quote: Pawel1626
          myth, it is not clear who created it and it is not clear why it is distributed

          This myth was substantiated by prominent figures from the Novosibirsk branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences, and the purpose was the career of Yegor Kuzmich Ligachev, First Secretary of the Tomsk Regional Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which he built, among other things, on promoting the "anti-alcohol campaign" in 1985-87.
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. +5
          2 March 2016 15: 10
          Quote: Pawel1626
          So about 30% of the sale of alcohol is a myth, it is not clear who created it and it is not clear why it is being distributed.



          I will not argue about 30%, but at the cost of production (I'm afraid to lie - either 3,5 kopecks, or 5,5 kopecks) a liter of edible alcohol and a liter of vodka (even at 2,87 rubles per half liter) imagine income .. .

          Well, in terms of the amount produced and drunk ... Do not forget that the same vodka was exported by whole bulk carriers ...

          So I don’t even want to argue about the weighty contribution of this sector to the state budget ... Consider the multiple profit made almost from the air - the dream of any entrepreneur-capitalist ...

          To make sure of this, try now to return this matter to state hands ... I'm afraid to think about what kind of porridge will brew ...
          1. +3
            2 March 2016 15: 32
            Quote: weksha50
            I will not argue about 30%, but at the cost of production (I'm afraid to lie - either 3,5 kopecks, or 5,5 kopecks) a liter of edible alcohol and a liter of vodka (even at 2,87 rubles per half liter) imagine income .. .

            In fact, the selling price of rectified alcohol (drinking) from the plant for technical needs (respectively, without excise taxes) was 56 kopecks / liter, hydrolysis (technical) 47 kopecks / liter, for medical purposes - 68 kopecks / liter.
            1. +2
              2 March 2016 15: 55
              Quote: Wheel
              In fact, the selling price of rectified alcohol (drinking) from the plant for technical needs (respectively, without excise taxes) was 56 kopecks / liter, hydrolysis (technical) 47 kopecks / liter, for medical purposes - 68 kopecks / liter.



              I mentioned about the cost either in 1974 or in 1975 (I don’t remember), moreover, according to the chief technologist of the distillery ...
              And the selling price that you mentioned also speaks of the profit received not only by the state treasury, but also by the manufacturing company ...

              And both of us are talking about alcoholand not about vodka ... And there the profit-income becomes even more enormous ...
      4. +5
        2 March 2016 11: 18
        And what prevents alcohol nationalization, or alcoholics organize Maidan. So it is unlikely that it makes no difference to them in whose shop to buy it. But the Maidan really will not hurt, it’s time to fool around the road. We’ll pave the way, they will be stronger.
        1. +5
          2 March 2016 15: 16
          Quote: varov14
          And what prevents alcohol nationalization, or alcoholics organize Maidan.


          The opinion of alcoholics is precisely here that for a hundred years no one has been interested ...
          Maidan will try to organize (under any pretext) the owners of the production and sales of alcohol products ...
          And their financial capabilities cannot be ignored ... It is like a state in a state ...
      5. +3
        2 March 2016 11: 59
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        in the USSR,% of the budget from the sale of alcohol was believed to be almost 30 !!!

        The numbers are certainly overstated, but the regular retail trade in alcohol really brought colossal revenues to the budget. So in 1980-1985 the share of "alcoholic" revenues to the budget was about 10,0%!
      6. +4
        2 March 2016 12: 01
        Compared to oil, alcohol is a high-tech product.
      7. +6
        2 March 2016 14: 42
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        % of the budget from the sale of alcohol was considered to be almost 30 !!!



        Lost tobacco products ...

        How much doldrums about this - would return the production and sale of alcoholic and tobacco products to state hands - and there would be no whining about the budget deficit ...

        Plus, introduce a tax on luxury goods (legally substantiating this concept) and tear this tax as it should ...
      8. 0
        3 March 2016 18: 39
        They didn’t drink like that in my surroundings !!! request
      9. The comment was deleted.
    2. -5
      2 March 2016 08: 45
      Quote: domokl
      It is necessary to return production ... Stop being a raw materials appendage

      And this is what we have been doing for many years already! It was easy to break in the 90s ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      2 March 2016 09: 42
      The share of revenues from the sale of fuel and electricity (please pay attention - fuel and electricity) in the budget does not actually exceed 10,3% in the most “dependent” years, and on average between 1980 and 1990 it was about 8%.
      for those who want to read took from: http://eot16.ru/archives/1500 Yes

      article to the place and time, more interesting to read comments on it)))hi
  3. +27
    2 March 2016 06: 31
    Kudrin, Kasyanov, etc., are to blame, but not a guarantor ...
    1. +10
      2 March 2016 07: 23
      Quote: Nsk 54
      Kudrin, Kasyanov, etc., are to blame, but not a guarantor ...

      I hope you said this with sarcasm (ellipsis at the end) - plus from me good
  4. +16
    2 March 2016 06: 34
    All right. Still to learn how to correctly use the human reserves of our country.
    That would not be in offices and commerce to spend life aimlessly.
    In Moscow, there are now hundreds of thousands of people without work, and so what?
    Looking forward to being raised to overthrow the government?
    Create production, toss logistics between them.
    Yes, our production is not profitable due to costs,
    but another option is even worse when they simply refuse to sell this and that to us,
    as with parts for satellites.
    1. +5
      2 March 2016 08: 32
      Costs can be reduced by reasonable prices for energy and utilities, as well as cheap loans for industry, the rest depends on the political will of the people.
      1. +6
        2 March 2016 09: 47
        "... the rest depends on the political will of the people." lol

        Unfortunately, almost everything depends on the will people in the power structure ...

        and we are the electorate .... and then they ask us only before the elections ... hi
      2. +4
        2 March 2016 15: 36
        Quote: zoknyay82
        Costs can be reduced by reasonable prices for energy and utilities, also cheap industry loans, the rest depends on the political will of the people.


        Strange things are happening ...

        Prior to the imposition of sanctions, many of our enterprise-organizations were credited with foreign banks and funds, since their loans were issued at a much lower percentage than loans from our banks ...

        At the same time, Russian banks such as Sberbank of Russia and VTB, which have a lot of representative offices in other countries, provided loans to foreign firms and enterprises at a meager (compared to the rates for our enterprises) interest rate ... More recently, Sberbank did not lend I really remember which Ukrainian corporation for a large sum ...

        I can’t give a link, the information is scattered, but part of it can be found on the website of Sberbank of Russia.

        Can someone explain to me these perverse Polovtsian dances ??? What is this closed and vicious wheel of Fortune? And who can and should stop this orgy ???
        1. +3
          2 March 2016 15: 55
          Quote: weksha50
          At the same time, such Russian banks as Sberbank of Russia and VTB, which have a lot of representative offices in other countries, provided loans to foreign firms and enterprises at a meager (compared to the rates for our enterprises) interest rate ...

          Abroad, "our" banks "are forced" to play by their rules. laughing
          1. +3
            2 March 2016 22: 09
            Quote: Wheel
            Abroad, "our" banks "are forced to" play by their rules



            Even if they had better “played” on Russian territory, it would have been more useful ...
            And so - they work for a hostile economy, and the Russian treasury (budget) only receives tax on the profit they receive (usually distorted and concealed), that is, bits of 20% of fake profit volumes ...

            Gref, in his greed, has already sunk to the devil knows what, in our city in the microdistricts, at first, the staff in the offices in the microdistricts was reduced in order to "optimize", and now there is even a reduction in branches in several microdistricts ... profits of Sberbank !!! Even quite often rating and analytical agencies do not include it in the TOP-100 of Russian banks, because Sberbank and its capitalization and profit indicators are OUT OF REACH for others, even for VTB !!!
            1. +3
              3 March 2016 01: 28
              Quote: weksha50
              Even if they had better “played” on Russian territory, it would have been more useful ...

              It's impossible.
              The goals are not the same.
          2. +1
            3 March 2016 12: 30
            But why, excuse me, is this abroad to us? The Chinese have introduced state regulation and are not buzzing ...
        2. +5
          2 March 2016 17: 13
          The rate of Sberbank in the Czech Republic is 1,8% per annum. Advertising hung on every corner in 2015.
      3. +7
        2 March 2016 17: 11
        Quote: zoknyay82
        Costs can be reduced by reasonable prices for energy and utilities, as well as cheap loans.

        China went this way, setting state prices for raw materials and electricity, and a bank interest rate. He also limited the export of capital so that credit money did not fall into speculative niches of the markets.
      4. +1
        3 March 2016 12: 29
        Then the profits of our e-fictitious managers will fall. And they can’t eat on ent ...
    2. +14
      2 March 2016 08: 57
      Quote: Zomanus
      All right. Still to learn how to correctly use the human reserves of our country.
      That would not be in offices and commerce to spend life aimlessly.

      And why, security guards and sellers, are more necessary for the current economy than workers and engineers.
      In addition, any constructive work must be ideologically motivated, but with ideology we officially do not. And unofficially - to cut the dough, sell and "cut". The creation of satellites and other nonsense does not fit into this ideological series.
  5. +17
    2 March 2016 06: 39
    Indeed, such a rich country, we live as beggars ..
    1. +30
      2 March 2016 06: 48
      A friend recently arrived from Moscow, said one phrase - the crisis in Russia but her in Moscow. In my exhaustive
      1. +15
        2 March 2016 08: 39
        Marx also wrote that if freedom is given to capital, it will strangle everyone. Because he has no values. That's why I wanted to talk about values ​​today. And why does the liberal line just deny any values? Because there is only one value: everything is mine and mine is mine.
        Mikhail Khazin


        It’s hard to add something.
        1. +3
          3 March 2016 00: 46
          Quote: coolvoldik
          It’s hard to add something.

          I add that Marx himself worked only half a year, and the rest of the time he lived on Engels' money and speculated on the exchange (and unsuccessfully). But since Marx was a Jew, he knew very well how his fellow tribesmen use this capital). And by the way, capital is an instrument, with its help they did good, which Carl did not bother to describe ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +5
      2 March 2016 07: 33
      Quote: parusnik
      Indeed, such a rich country,

      and she has a "special become" ... recourse
  6. +23
    2 March 2016 06: 40
    Another month of "feeling the bottom" and "anti-crisis measures" in Barnaul, only civil servants will be at work. In industry, there are no orders, the construction site has practically stopped.

    Regarding the title of the article: Jews (Thatcher, Albright, etc.) said that 15 million people should be left in Russia. Everything goes according to plan. The Medvedevs and Siluanovs are not stupid in fact.
    1. +6
      2 March 2016 08: 44
      Quote: SarS
      The Medvedevs and Siluanovs are not stupid in fact.

      There is no doubt about it; they are trying to make them fools.
      Read:“May the provincial intellectual marginals rescue Baikal ...”
      http://sev-ural.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3669
    2. +1
      2 March 2016 08: 48
      Well it started - "if there is no water in the tap ......". Or the State Department is guilty as always. Aren't you tired of believing in ZOG?
      1. +2
        2 March 2016 09: 40
        We don’t believe. We know. The whole history of relationships speaks about this.
    3. 0
      2 March 2016 14: 38
      They are S. *. *. And.
  7. +19
    2 March 2016 06: 46
    What do you want, the loot falls into the pockets of the authorities, and everything else, including the impoverished people who have to endure, is simply an unfortunate misunderstanding with which it is fighting hard ...
  8. +9
    2 March 2016 06: 52
    At the same time, at the height of the crisis, the capitalization of the largest Russian petrochemical holding SIBUR doubled. High technology works wonders.

    As far as I remember from the news of 2, 3 years ago, the government literally forced oil companies to invest in the reconstruction of the production of oil products and now anyone who obeyed is skimming the cream.
  9. +18
    2 March 2016 06: 53
    Spring is already, slush - traffic jams, a pit in a pit, a very important bridge has been standing for a year already (they are waiting for money from the federal center), enterprises are slowly fading away! A lot of work, a huge scope of work, and not only in our city, but throughout the country. What kind of unemployment can we have ??? Naturally, if the average salary of an official is more than 100 thousand, then he doesn't care. But not everyone can fit in like this. It is possible to find money to solve all these pressing problems, and it is not necessary to introduce new taxes and excise taxes, it is necessary to ask our "best" people on a "good" basis - pinch off EVERYONE (from our reserves and over the hill) for the development of OUR country! This is not a call for a revolution, it is just a good wish. After all, some patrons of the arts have enough money to help build churches and hold any events ... and they will find it here.
    Recall 1612 - after all, the butcher Kuzma Minin was able to shell out merchants and boyars, the Fatherland was in danger, but now not?
    1. +10
      2 March 2016 08: 52
      Quote: Michael55
      This is not a call for revolution, it's just a good wish

      Wish?
      Yes, here you need to shout and demand!
    2. +1
      3 March 2016 15: 52
      Quote: Michael55
      Recall 1612 - after all, the butcher Kuzma Minin was able to shell out merchants and boyars, the Fatherland was in danger, but now not?


      Do you know how? I had to take people from elected Novgorod citizens with people elected from the people hostage their households, and so there was nothing else to do but redeem their own at the offered price. So they supplied the militia of Novgorod with everything necessary! So Russia was saved!
      "From Russia to Russia" Gumilev.
  10. +13
    2 March 2016 06: 56
    The facts show irrefutably that all this abomination, sanctions and the crisis will ultimately play into the hands of the domestic economy. Russia will be right for the hundredth time.

    I do not understand what is right? in the fact that she sat on the needle and can not get down? Who will return trillions of which are no longer ?? Some kind of agitation judging by the link SR .. hello Mironov))))
    I have never mentioned Putin ... all of them switchmen are to blame .. a parody of the opposition - only to lisp in a duroscope ((((((
    1. +3
      2 March 2016 07: 26
      Quote: afdjhbn67
      Some kind of agitation judging by the link SR .. hello Mironov))))
      I have never mentioned Putin

      therefore, rather a member of EP ...
  11. +17
    2 March 2016 07: 03
    We decided to get rid of pensioners on the sly - https://lenta.ru/news/2016/03/02/medicine/ - there will be no cheap drugs, and so now the drugs have become unjustifiably expensive. I go to the pharmacy, I see thousands of drugs for pensioners they probably want to do worse so that they don’t have any food left.
    1. +15
      2 March 2016 07: 29
      Quote: Ilya77
      I go to the pharmacy

      I go to the hospital (my father is lying), I buy everything! syringes, alcohol wipes, some medicines, "systems" ... glory to the Ministry of Health and the government!
      1. +14
        2 March 2016 07: 42
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        .. glory to the Ministry of Health and the Government!

        Do not trifle Yuryevich - Putin’s glory right away wink
        1. +6
          2 March 2016 07: 50
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          .. glory to the Ministry of Health and the Government!

          Do not trifle Yuryevich - Putin’s glory right away wink

          thanks to him separately! Yes
        2. +1
          3 March 2016 16: 01

          Quote: afdjhbn67
          Do not trifle Yuryevich - Putin’s glory right away


          Putin is not a unit. Putin is the public face of a hidden structure, hidden but no less real.
          And he is not an exception, but a rule clearly executed in this best of the worlds. Who does not agree, put minus.
      2. +1
        2 March 2016 08: 38
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        buy everything! syringes, alcohol wipes, some medicines, "systems" ... glory to the Ministry of Health and the government!

        Strange, I live not far from Yekaterinburg, but in hospitals, at least a year ago, everything was there, and syringes and medicines.
      3. +4
        2 March 2016 08: 38
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Quote: Ilya77
        I go to the pharmacy

        I go to the hospital (my father is lying), I buy everything! syringes, alcohol wipes, some medicines, "systems" ... glory to the Ministry of Health and the government!

        We all need to strangle ourselves.
        Chuchmeks from wild places will be brought to our place.
    2. +3
      2 March 2016 15: 21
      I live in Khrushchev, so in my entrance six pensioners have died in the last 2-3 years, the diagnoses are different, but there is one reason, there is no money for quality treatment, and with new prices for medicines, there will be more funeral processions ...
  12. +1
    2 March 2016 07: 03
    invest these funds in a complete upgrade of the country's industrial base, with the massive creation of high-tech enterprises in all sectors of the economy.
    Will there be a demand for these products? They created Yota Phone, but nobody really needs something, the Chinese can also make millions of cars, but somehow they don’t really grab them
    1. +10
      2 March 2016 07: 14
      Quote: Saffron
      Yota Phone created,

      There wasn’t enough mind or greed defeated the price for him to make normal, albeit not budgetary - they wanted from the first not very successful attempt to jump in one row with Athos and Galaxy))) - the price of the first version is 21000 rubles, iota background 2 - 39999))) and who will buy?
    2. +12
      2 March 2016 07: 20
      Quote: Saffron
      Yota Phone was created, but nobody really needs something

      In your opinion, are high technologies limited to the iotaphone?

      Kosmos
      Nuclear technology
      arms export

      three most competitive domestic industries

      Promote your analogue of Boeing and Airbus (what a reserve!), create an analog of the South Korean STX (large-capacity shipbuilding), create modern models of ship gas-turbine engines of high power - direct competitors to GE and RR, create new data network standards (faster than LTE, on plasma solid state antennas), sell technology and patents, move biotechnology, genetic engineering

      WHERE IS ALL THIS?

      Hello, Welcome! The most reading country in the world ?! The best education in Europe? Selling oil, South Stream gas pipeline?
      Arrogant shame
      Quote: Saffron
      Will there be a demand for these products?

      Kaspersky has a demand

      Once again - you should not go where there is no progress (for the production of consumer goods, we will never catch up with Malaysia and China). Russia can do a lot of unique things and export for monopoly prices. There is always a demand for such things.
      1. +12
        2 March 2016 07: 23
        Quote: BENNERT
        Kosmos
        Nuclear technology
        arms export

        All completely Soviet backlogs, but they are already running out ... what gave birth to in the era of "liberalism"? it looks like only Iota-von belay the mountain gave birth to a mouse)) crying
        1. +9
          2 March 2016 07: 40
          Even Chubais's "iotaphone" is made in Taiwan. In Russia, he was only painted.
        2. +15
          2 March 2016 08: 55
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          .. what was born in the era of "liberalism"?

          oligarchs and corruption
        3. +1
          3 March 2016 00: 55
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          All entirely Soviet backlogs

          Soviet groundwork was once a royal groundwork)
      2. +13
        2 March 2016 07: 38
        In order to revive the high-tech industries that have been ditched over the past 30 years, we must first change the whole Power and ideology, and only then will there be the opportunity to build an updated industry.
        But what kind of power will voluntarily give way to the State Trough ...
        1. +4
          2 March 2016 08: 25
          Quote: Polar
          you must first change all Power and ideology,

          Elections are just around the corner
          1. +6
            2 March 2016 08: 59
            There are no government people on the horizon who are those who crush
          2. +1
            3 March 2016 01: 31
            Quote: Was Mammoth
            Quote: Polar
            you must first change all Power and ideology,

            Elections are just around the corner

            And what?
        2. 0
          2 March 2016 09: 54
          Our high-tech industries are developing well - as an example of KRET and SHVABE.
        3. +3
          2 March 2016 10: 33
          Quote: Polar
          In order to revive the high-tech industries that have been ditched over the past 30 years, we must first change the whole Power and ideology, and only then will there be the opportunity to build an updated industry.

          What ideology are you talking about? Article 13 paragraph 2 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation states: No ideology can be established as state or mandatory.
          1. +7
            2 March 2016 11: 36
            No ideology can be established as a state or mandatory.
            Then the one who is called the guarantor violates the constitution, for he constantly says that Russia is doomed to liberalism. Liberalism is an ideology.
            1. +2
              2 March 2016 11: 58
              Quote: Gardamir
              No ideology can be established as a state or mandatory.
              Then the one who is called the guarantor violates the constitution, for he constantly says that Russia is doomed to liberalism. Liberalism is an ideology.

              It means violates the constitution. This is the latest revision from 23.01.2016/XNUMX/XNUMX.
      3. +7
        2 March 2016 07: 44
        Quote: BENNERT
        Hello, welcome! The most read country in the world ?! The best education in Europe?

        - this is not about Russia ... already ... unfortunately.
        1. +9
          2 March 2016 07: 53
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          - this is not about Russia ... already ... unfortunately.

          Then about whom?

          With all the corruption, problems with technical backwardness and objective shortcomings of the existing education system (too long program, "diplomas and candidates to order", 100 thousand "pseudoscientific plankton" with degrees, but without knowledge, receiving money for nothing), get those ... specialty in Russia is more difficult than in the same States. Incomparably harder.
          1. +7
            2 March 2016 08: 21
            Quote: BENNERT
            Then about whom?

            I have no idea, but in Russia they read extremely little, and education has frankly fallen ... (city library, always empty, occasionally elderly people come, nephew wife-librarian)
            1. +6
              2 March 2016 08: 23
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              I have no idea, but in Russia they read extremely little, and education has frankly fallen ... (city library, always empty, occasionally elderly people come, nephew wife-librarian)

              Read mostly online
              1. +2
                2 March 2016 08: 55
                Quote: BENNERT
                Read mostly online

                oh I beg you !!! do not tell my slippers! all read right!
                1. +7
                  2 March 2016 09: 20
                  Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                  all read right!

                  I did not speak for everyone
                  but the percentage is great

                  those sitting in vehicles have tablets with books by Murakami, Coelho, Prachchett (flat world) and other fashion authors
                  huge popularity among Weller, Bykov, military history - Solonin, Beshanov. Books authored by Muldashev, The New Chronology of Nosovsky, albeit by and large pseudo-history, but written interestingly, makes you think and analyze.

                  among schoolchildren popular modern science fiction, books on cult games. So much so that each such project tries to create a mass of similar books (the same Stalker)

                  They read the classics, it’s not in vain that so many popular films and series have been shot (, Bulgakov’s Master). Because All these works are close and familiar to the viewer.

                  Type in the search engine the name of any book - the tags "download", "download free", "download in pdf" will immediately appear

                  At VO dozens of new articles daily, with hundreds of comments

                  You can endlessly continue this story.
                  1. +5
                    2 March 2016 10: 06
                    Quote: BENNERT
                    I did not speak for everyone
                    but the percentage is great

                    we live with you, in different dimensions ... you painted a straight idyllic picture, you have never seen this ... mostly play, sit on social networks, or stupidly on YouTube.
            2. -1
              2 March 2016 09: 59
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich

              I have no idea, but in Russia they read extremely little, and education has frankly fallen ... (city library, always empty, occasionally elderly people come, nephew wife-librarian)

              Do not judge by yourself.
        2. +6
          2 March 2016 08: 35
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Quote: BENNERT
          Hello, welcome! The most read country in the world ?! The best education in Europe?

          - this is not about Russia ... already ... unfortunately.

          Quote: BENNERT
          Read mostly online

          Online versus a real printed book is like pills against dumplings. wink
          I picked up a bound book, made of magazines, home-made with love. Someone threw it away. Famine used to be for good books.
          1. +1
            2 March 2016 08: 45
            Quote: There was a mammoth
            Online versus a real printed book is like pills against dumplings.

            Why is this conclusion made?
            1. +3
              2 March 2016 08: 50
              Of course, the XXI century! But! Each book has its own story, even the smell has its own. What smell can a computer have? wink
              1. +2
                2 March 2016 08: 57
                Quote: There was a mammoth
                Each book has its own story, even the smell has its own.

                I was taught the main thing is not the cover, but what is inside
                1. +2
                  2 March 2016 09: 13
                  Quote: BENNERT
                  I was taught the main thing is not the cover, but what is inside

                  You are right, but in the library you could see even at first glance, what a book is worth. From a computer, for me, this is closer to technical information, less for the soul. And, minus you put in vain.
                  1. +6
                    2 March 2016 09: 25
                    Quote: There was a mammoth
                    From a computer, for me, this is closer to technical information, less for the soul.

                    This is a tribute to habit
                    I am also more comfortable reading a printed book, another thing is not always possible
                    Quote: There was a mammoth
                    . And, minus you put in vain.

                    Not very upset
                  2. +1
                    2 March 2016 10: 48
                    Quote: There was a mammoth
                    From a computer, for me, this is closer to technical information, less for the soul.

                    You can also read it well from a computer. Well, I have three readers. I prefer PDF and DJVI as technical, and FB-2 is preferred as art and fiction. Moreover, I have a laptop, I can read it while lying down. FB is hard to read, but can.
                2. +1
                  3 March 2016 16: 24
                  Quote: BENNERT
                  BENNERT Yesterday, 08:57 ↑
                  Quote: There was a mammoth
                  Each book has its own story, even the smell has its own.
                  I was taught the main thing is not the cover, but what is inside


                  A good book begins with a cover, and a cover with a good artist! If the cover is adequately and tastefully decorated, then its pages will be no worse designed! And the smell! The paints were on natural oils! As a result, the reader had a chance to get artistic and aesthetic pleasure and education from such a Book, and it is worth a lot!
                  Now reigns plastic, derived from oil, the decay product of once living organisms, maybe this is the whole point?
          2. +2
            3 March 2016 01: 03
            Quote: There was a mammoth
            Online versus a real printed book is like pills against dumplings.

            Unfortunately, everything is changing. A good book in the store 300-800r. In the internet, the price is multiplied by 0. And there is no need for tragedies about copyright, anyone who wants to make a word will find use in other areas of the same Internet, and who has something to write, writes not for money.
    3. +6
      2 March 2016 07: 20
      As for cars, Korea started as did China, made copies of famous brands, and slowly grew into worthy manufacturers.
      Yota really wanted to buy himself, but damn, they went too far with the price ((
    4. +6
      2 March 2016 07: 30
      Quote: Saffron
      Yota Phone created

      the percentage of ours is not great there ...
      1. +7
        2 March 2016 07: 39
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        the percentage of ours is not great there ...

        Yes, what are you, Andrey - and show off ??? (more expensive than money)))))
        1. +5
          2 March 2016 07: 46
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          Yes, what are you, Andrey - and show off ??? (more expensive than money)))))

          nothing to argue ...
      2. -1
        2 March 2016 08: 39
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich

        the percentage of ours is not great there ...

        And what is the percentage of Amerovsky’s iPhone? also made in china.
        1. +5
          2 March 2016 08: 50
          Quote: KOSMOS59
          And what is the percentage of Amerovsky’s iPhone?

          In California Cupertino, the brain center of the company is concentrated - designers, programmers, economists, managers of all stripes work there. Everyone who invented this device and brought the technology to mass production

          Quote: KOSMOS59
          also made in china.

          Multinational Production

          Component parts for the famous iPhone smartphones are purchased from Korean Samsung, LG, Hynix, Qualcomm, Elpida. In particular, the company signed a contract for the creation of processors with the Korean manufacturer Samsung, and LG Display employees make flat LCD displays for it.

          The Foxconn plant is currently the only production base where iPhone is assembled from finished components. It produces forty percent of the world's electronics, in contact with leading brands of electronic devices, and began to fulfill orders of a well-known American company since the distant 2007.

          The plant is located in Shenzhen, on the border with Hong Kong. More than a million Chinese work there, two hundred and thirty thousand of which are directly collected by iPhones.
    5. +1
      2 March 2016 09: 49
      Quote: Saffron
      Yota Phone created

      It is that over there in the city of Saratov they will release the iPhone 7 under the local brand name "Saratov" aka refrigerator :-)
    6. +4
      2 March 2016 10: 20
      Quote: Saffron
      Will there be a demand for these products? They created Yota Phone, but nobody really needs something, the Chinese can also make millions of cars, but somehow they don’t really grab them

      They made a superjet - they have already released 101 recently, the MC-21 is next in line, since the Perm PD-14 engine will soon be put into production. The floating nuclear power plant will soon be ready, also a very promising project, including for export. To develop the Northern Sea Route is also an interesting direction. It is quite possible to invest in industry, rather than debt obligations of other countries - there would be a desire and will.
  13. +5
    2 March 2016 07: 07
    Kudrin would have companions in the forefront of these 80% unnecessary. Yesterday, the oil tycoons seem to have agreed not to increase production. On the one hand, it’s not bad for the economy, as well as for the author of the article. But where is the confidence that these same magnates will not take "their" from us in order to preserve their profits?
  14. +4
    2 March 2016 07: 08
    it is necessary to start with the formation of cadres. "cadres decide everything" ... and refusal to sell oil in this, unfortunately, will not help ...
  15. +14
    2 March 2016 07: 10
    Russia does not have a master, a master in a good sense of the word.
  16. +13
    2 March 2016 07: 17
    America guarantees that America and Turkey prevent our economy from raising our economy; it’s not right that one guarantor is good, but all the bad ones are always the ones who prevent the economy from rising.
    1. +10
      2 March 2016 08: 00
      America then prevents us from guaranteeing either Ukraine or Turkey to boost the economy
      You forgot about the Soviet Union, it seems that it isn’t there, but whoever knows the guarantor of what, in every speech curses
  17. The comment was deleted.
    1. +19
      2 March 2016 07: 36
      Quote: Stas157
      if Putin does not change his liberal government

      What does liberal mean?

      The basic idea of ​​liberalism - the primacy of private property, its inviolability and protection.
      Who has the most property in Russia? Give me a list of billionaires. Surprise-surprise - all, as one, deputies and ministers, as well as members of their families to the seventh generation. We also look at the siloviki, FSB generals, the pagodas of the Shoigu palace, Yakunin's fur store, superyachts A. Melnichenko, the national leader of the peoples of the Caucasus, part-time bai and Sultan Ramzanka Dyrov

      These people - they are true liberals. Ready to protect your property in every way possible
      1. +12
        2 March 2016 07: 40
        Quote: BENNERT
        What does liberal mean?

        And notice how beautiful, propaganda has replaced the concepts))))
      2. +2
        2 March 2016 08: 47
        Quote: BENNERT
        What does liberal mean?

        I understand this as "pro-Western".
        1. +6
          2 March 2016 09: 02
          Quote: Stas157
          I understand this as "pro-Western".

          Then you use the wrong term

          Liberalism is impossible without property. owner = liberal. Big owner = double liberal. where does the west come from?
          liberalism - the idea of ​​the primacy of private property and its protection

          and Russian liberals (a list I brought you) will hold on to their property until the last
          1. +3
            2 March 2016 09: 34
            Quote: BENNERT
            Liberalism is impossible without property.

            Did I say the opposite? LIBERALITY - (Latin liberalitas). Freethinking; free mindset. Dictionary of foreign words. I will surprise you, no system is possible without property and its protection!
            Rather, you are replacing concepts:
            The concept of "liberal" is different in different countries. In many countries, the pair is made up of "liberals vs. conservatives", whose differences depend on the most important issues that exist in this particular society. So in Latin America at the end of the 19th century, liberals were for equal rights for illegitimate children with legitimate ones.
            In the United States, people of leftist views are usually called "liberal" - that is, supporters of the protection of the rights of the working class, equality of women, equality of races. That is, in the United States, both a communist and a Trotskyist will be easily registered as liberals.
            In England, a liberal is a supporter of the Liberal Party.
            The funny thing is that all of the above understandings of the word "liberal" are conditional, based on certain local conditions.

            The word "liberal" appeared in Russia (erroneously) as a synonym for the word "democrat". Liberals were understood as supporters of building a state corresponding to the ideas of political liberalism

            in Russia, very few people know what this word means, television has created in people an image of a kind of despicable liberalist), who is an American spy and puts sticks in the wheels of all Putin's bright undertakings ...
            1. +2
              2 March 2016 09: 56
              Liberalism (from lat. Liberalis - free) - a philosophical and socio-political movement, proclaiming the inviolability of human rights and individual freedoms

              Liberalism proclaims the rights and freedoms of each person as the supreme value and establishes them as the legal basis of social and economic order. Economically the principles of liberalism are the inviolability of private property
              1. +1
                4 March 2016 18: 41
                Quote: BENNERT
                Liberalism proclaims the rights and freedoms of each person as the supreme value and establishes them as the legal basis of social and economic order. In economic terms, the principles of liberalism are the inviolability of private property


                Or, as we say in Odessa: "It was yours, it became ours!"
          2. +1
            4 March 2016 18: 36
            Quote: BENNERT
            Liberalism is impossible without property. owner = liberal. Big owner = double liberal. where does the west come from?
            liberalism - the idea of ​​the primacy of private property and its protection


            Private ownership of what?
            Yes, to make money! On a private printing station! Everything else is deceit and disguise in a competitive war for the right to print money FREE! Here it is all your liberalism, with its idea and dream of freedom! Either you print money on your machine, and lend it on bail with interest on debt and grow rich, or you are a debtor and a slave to the owner of the money! All other arguments from the evil one, his cunning WEST!
      3. +1
        4 March 2016 18: 10
        Quote: BENNERT
        The main idea of ​​liberalism is the primacy of private property, its inviolability and protection.
        Who has the most property in Russia? Give me a list of billionaires. Surprise-surprise - all, as one, deputies and ministers, as well as members of their families to the seventh generation. We also look at the siloviki, FSB generals, the pagodas of the Shoigu palace, Yakunin's fur store, superyachts A. Melnichenko, the national leader of the peoples of the Caucasus, part-time bai and Sultan Ramzanka Dyrov


        Where did you pick it out? Forbes read.
        The public debt of America is 19 dollars! This is not counting HUNDRED trillions of dollars of debts of individuals and legal entities. These numbers speak only of one thing: in America there is no longer the private property of its people, it is ALL mortgaged and re-mortgaged, and has become truly private property, of the PRIVATE FRS banking cartel!
        "the idea of ​​liberalism is the supremacy of private property, its inviolability and protection ????????????????"
        “If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the pit ..!”
  18. +4
    2 March 2016 07: 21
    Maybe they have there:
    -----------------------------
    As the Japanese minister proudly declared: our only wealth is our people
    -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
    -

    Only here we have another slogan: people, from the word is born
  19. +9
    2 March 2016 07: 30
    We talk about this from the very beginning of the fat years, then the first voices began to sound in support of the beginning of a new course, not putting money into a small pill, but in updating fixed assets, stimulating the return of scientific personnel back to our country, growing our own. There is nothing new here, where did Peter 1 begin ?! From acquaintance with new technologies abroad and by all means stimulate their appearance with us. But for something to happen, you need it to be necessary for those responsible. And with us, all nobles sit comfortably on oil.
  20. +17
    2 March 2016 07: 31
    Dissatisfaction is growing among the people, protest is ripening, to the delight of the white puppies! Obviously, if Putin does not change his liberal government, doesn’t remove the thieves of governors, doesn’t change the economy, whose budget depends only on the sale of oil and gas, and maintains a huge gap between the rich and the poor, then the credit of trust in the president will tend to zero! Putin has no choice! Need to get up to the people! But, while he is not very in a hurry.
    1. +12
      2 March 2016 07: 52
      Quote: Stas157
      Obviously, if Putin will not change his liberal government, will not remove the thieves of governors, will not change the economy, the budget of which will depend only on the sale of oil and gas, will maintain a huge gap between the rich and the poor, then the credit of trust in the president will tend to zero! Putin has no choice! Need to get up to the people! But, while he is not very in a hurry.

      If - another word, like Rogozin - I give a tooth lol
      1. +2
        2 March 2016 08: 13
        Can someone explain why Rogozin is treated badly? In my opinion, he is a brilliant speaker and a good industrialist.
        1. +15
          2 March 2016 09: 15
          Quote: Stas157
          Can someone explain why Rogozin is treated badly? In my opinion, he is a brilliant speaker and a good industrialist.

          Actually, he is a humanist, hence the balabstvo, and he was the dominant litter from the very beginning.
          And now his son is an industrialist, the director of a unique defense plant.
          Read more, comrade. good
    2. +9
      2 March 2016 09: 54
      Quote: Stas157
      if Putin does not change his liberal government, doesn’t remove the thieves of governors, doesn’t change the economy, the budget of which depends only on the sale of oil and gas, he will maintain a huge gap between the rich and the poor

      It won’t be all
      Quote: Stas157
      about a credit of confidence in the president will tend to zero!

      And here the movement will be the opposite, faith in a good king and bad boyars will be warmed up
  21. +2
    2 March 2016 07: 35
    Quote: Sensatus
    But even this well-fed calm life does not promise

    A well-fed and calm life corrupts ... Yes, and there is no such life, nature does not provide.)
  22. +9
    2 March 2016 07: 39
    in conditions of the “Kudrino” economy in Russia, it is advisable to live no more than thirty million people

    At the time of EBN, this figure sounded from the "fathers of Russian democracy" at the suggestion of advisers from the United States. Therefore, the goal of making Russia a raw material appendage of the West (primarily the United States) is not new and has its own specific roots, which are entrenched in the current government.
  23. +4
    2 March 2016 07: 51
    A very good idea is to limit the export of natural resources. Oil, gas, electric leave energy in the country. Perhaps, the production will become profitable, and those who want to build factories will be pulled from abroad, and 20 million high-tech jobs may appear according to the May decrees of Putin. The roasted rooster pecked and thundered, let's see what the government will do.
    1. +18
      2 March 2016 08: 11
      The government will raise taxes, excise taxes, reduce the budget for education and medicine, etc.
      1. +2
        2 March 2016 16: 04
        It, the government, is already doing this.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +9
      2 March 2016 08: 32
      Quote: surozh
      A very good idea is to limit the export of natural resources. Oil, gas, electric leave energy in the country. Perhaps, production will become profitable, and those who want to build factories will be pulled from abroad

      Also, to sell these oil, gas and electricity domestically at a margin of 15-20% (since, to hell, this is our national treasure!), And not ten times more expensive! Then, those who want to build factories from abroad will increase!
  24. +19
    2 March 2016 07: 57
    Quote: Nsk 54
    Kudrin, Kasyanov, etc., are to blame, but not a guarantor ...

    Our "guarantor" -superman, as befits the great leader of all peoples Chungachguk, has already spoken out on this topic, "We NEED to learn to compensate (ATTENTION!) The negative social consequences of a market economy and the ORGANICALLY generated inequality. So, as countries that have long lived under capitalism have learned to do this. This is a special, special support that children from poor families receive in their education. This is social housing for the lowest income families. "
    That is what our great leader and teacher strives for.
  25. +6
    2 March 2016 08: 01
    When they say "hooked on an oil needle," an analogy is undoubtedly drawn with a drug addict who does not see the meaning of his life beyond the next admission through a vein. If we draw the analogy further, then getting rid of addiction occurs in two ways:
    1. A drug addict by force of will "kumarit on dry", it happens, a terrible sight. Dry means not using analgesics. For two weeks, a person dies from terrible pain, everything hurts and the pain does not stop, severe sweating, convulsions, can be done. Another two weeks, when the pain begins to subside, the addict is no longer able to walk and speak, it is an amorphous mass. Then gradually the person comes to life. Not everyone can stand it.
    2. Relatives put the drug addict in a hospital and there, under the supervision of doctors, gradually reduce the dose to relieve pain with analgesics, most drug addicts "overcook" so this is a less painful process.

    So, the author offers the first option. This option requires the will of the country's leadership, and it will take a lot, the country will be "wrenched in pain" for many years, it will actually be dying. For many Russians, hard times will come, in comparison with which the 90s will seem like a holiday ... But this option is unrealistic because there is no will for change ...
    1. +5
      2 March 2016 08: 15
      Quote: Mera Joota
      Relatives put the addict in the hospital and there under the supervision of doctors gradually reduce the dose

      Deputy of the State Duma (faction "Fair Russia") Oleg Pakholkov sent an appeal to the head of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Alexei Ulyukayev with a request to consider the possibility for five years completely stop the sale of oil abroad.

      Gradual decline of 20% per year
      Quote: Mera Joota
      getting rid of addiction occurs in two ways:

      If you dig this topic, then the mass of options
      for example, the use of ibogaine (ibogi). In the States, this method of treatment is prohibited, in Canada and Mexico legal. Meaning - the patient is almost dying, the next day he is either still a drug addict, or, in most cases (according to rumors, the success rate is up to 70%), he cannot look at coke and heroin. How exactly iboga works - no one knows, obviously stimulates certain parts of the brain to produce natural enzymes. The main danger is that no one knows how the patient will endure this prolonged trance state.

      But it is, for general development
      1. +2
        2 March 2016 12: 12
        "Deputy of the State Duma (faction" Fair Russia ") Oleg Pakholkov sent an appeal to the head of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia Alexei Ulyukaev with a request to consider the possibility of completely stopping the sale of oil abroad within five years." 20% per year of budget revenues from oil sales - where will it take the equivalent amount of taxes per year, from which non-primary industries?
  26. +7
    2 March 2016 08: 03
    80% of Russians will not agree to just die and die. Rather, they will make those remaining 20% ​​do it.
  27. +19
    2 March 2016 08: 07
    In the conditions of the “Kudrino” economy in Russia, it is advisable to live no more than thirty million people
    Let’s finally decide who the head of state is in Russia! Or he does not decide anything, but everything is decided by the Kudrins, the Shuvalovs. Medvedev (anyone can put any name), then why the one who does not solve anything. Or we live in the country that he creates, with the Kudrins, etc., with partners, with a liberal economy, with Uzbek nannies and realtors. And again, why do we need all this? Since the days of Crimea, I have been tracking his performances; in no one did he remember the people.
  28. +15
    2 March 2016 08: 19
    Who is there going to destroy 80% of the population of Russia ?! The surname of the "hero" in the studio. For me, it is much more useful for Russia to destroy such fighters of the people in Russia, and with all their paschens. There are factories in Russia, but they buy everything over the hill. And why ?! But because they sold themselves to foreign companies and instead of raising the industry and economy in Russia, they defend the interests of foreign companies, creating jobs abroad, to the detriment of Russia. I remember that Chubais crucified that the extinction of tens of millions of people in the Russian Federation is not a problem. And if someone strangles one rabid red rat, there will be no problems for the Russian Federation, it will only benefit.
    1. +2
      2 March 2016 22: 12
      Quote: Hecate
      Russia ?! The surname of the “hero” in the studio.



      "CHUBAIS ... THE BEGINNING" ...

      But it looks like a bastard ...
    2. +1
      3 March 2016 13: 52
      and continuation
  29. +10
    2 March 2016 08: 22
    A couple of questions. What will change in our country if the officials are cut in half? The answer is nothing. What will change if the post of prime minister is removed? Nothing. Yes, and more. What will change if hydrocarbons are only for domestic consumption? Nothing will change for a common man in the street. All this is income for our "beloved" leaders and oligarchs. All this deprives us of additional jobs. When they put pressure on active citizens with regular taxes, do you know what they say? "If you don’t like it, close your individual entrepreneur, all the same, it’s minuscule in revenue for the state." And income is the same hydrocarbons.
  30. +12
    2 March 2016 08: 23
    Of course there are no extra people! There is an extra electorate. For this reason, they want to reduce medicine costs by 3 times, raise their retirement age, deepen the Unified State Examination and instill obscurantism in their brains .... Capitalism will never work in the interests of people, this is opposed to its essence, the essence of profit and exploitation!
    1. +1
      3 March 2016 13: 55

      and that's it.
  31. +2
    2 March 2016 08: 27
    while the liberals are in power, it will be that 80% of you are superfluous in Russia, we ask where is progressive taxation, where is concessional lending to production and agriculture, and in the end when will this fucking transport tax be abolished
    1. -4
      2 March 2016 08: 45
      Progressive taxation was. There was no collection. Lending at a rate lower than inflation, at the expense of the state — virtually free aid — it would be nice to determine who and for what. Transport tax - road maintenance tax. You have an armored personnel carrier and do not care for your roads?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  32. +6
    2 March 2016 08: 27
    People need to be retrained, given modern, in-demand specialties, to create jobs in the advanced sectors of our economy. And about the raw curse is nonsense. A bad dancer is always hindered by something. The oil and gas complex employs a very small percentage of human resources, and they bring colossal income to the country. Modern production does not "consume" a lot of human resources. With our experience and traditions in science and education, we are able to raise the country through improving the quality of labor resources, and then throw them into a breakthrough in the nuclear industry and energy, space and defense.
    1. +1
      2 March 2016 10: 02
      the oil and gas sector does not generate income, but collects natural rents! it is so called in economic theory
    2. +2
      2 March 2016 10: 04
      "Modern production does not" consume "a lot of human resources" - the tendency is that automation will replace manual labor, from year to year more and more, in the end there will be design engineers, CNC machine operators, automatic line adjusters.
    3. +6
      2 March 2016 11: 47
      and they bring a huge income to the country
      Sorry, you were mistaken, this money is not intended for Russia. They will be purchased US bonds
  33. +5
    2 March 2016 08: 29
    So, since 2000, when oil prices began to rise, the heads of government we had were Putin, Kasyanov, Zubkov, Medvedev, Fradkov, Khristenko. Presidents Putin and Medvedev. And of course, Kudrin, who was the Ministry of Finance, was to blame - that is, a specialist in the accumulation of money, and not in their adequate spending. With spending on the above characters. As for the accumulation, while Kudrin was there, there was dofig in the reserves, and now something else remains
  34. +13
    2 March 2016 08: 35
    Economy for people or people for economy - that’s the question.
    The title of the article reflects the point of view of the "golden billion" theory.
    According to it, 1 billion people should have everything on earth that they want. To do this, a few more billion were slaves. The rest of the population is an unnecessary burden.
    In this theory, people mean you yourself know whom.
    There is no place for us there.
    Propaganda of the ideas of anti-humanity is not prohibited, unlike anti-Zionism ...
  35. -9
    2 March 2016 08: 48
    I believe that Kurdin is generally the only effective official in our government who has fully and successfully performed official duties. Well maybe Shoigu
    1. +9
      2 March 2016 09: 00
      Quote: Kenneth
      I believe that Kurdin is generally the only effective official in our government who has fully and successfully performed official duties.

      Well yes! Effectively withdrew our money to American and European GKOs, which blew the Russian economy (if only there was no inflation!), At the same time, our government actively encouraged Western investment! Don't you think that there is some kind of contradiction here?
      1. 0
        2 March 2016 09: 31
        It is strange where the comment went. I repeat. The Ministry of Finance is the accumulation of money. Western GKOs are a highly liquid and reliable instrument of accumulation. Decisions on spending on domestic needs are decisions of the government and the president and not the Ministry of Finance. So the claim is not to Kudrin, everyones.
        1. +5
          2 March 2016 12: 08
          Quote: Kenneth
          The Ministry of Finance is the accumulation of money. Western GKOs are a highly liquid and reliable instrument of accumulation.

          - What are we saving up for?
          - For a rainy day!
          - So the crisis has taken place!
          - We will not burn our foreign exchange reserves! (Anton Siluanov)

          And Russian GKOs are not suitable for accumulation?
          1. +2
            2 March 2016 12: 26
            Russian GKOs are well suited for high-profile fake (1998). Western - a tool that has proven its reliability, whatever you think. VIZs were used to cover the 2008-2009 crisis. Now, by the way, too. What remains is already crumbs, because since 2011 Kudrin has not been in the government. Modern gold and foreign currency reserves will go to very extreme topics, let's hope that this does not happen.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      2 March 2016 10: 12
      Yes, he is the only one of the few in the government by education - namely, higher economic education, which corresponds to his "place of work", in contrast to all the others, it is not clear where they came from and it is not clear what they were doing earlier.
  36. +7
    2 March 2016 09: 05
    1.03.2016/24/450 on TV XNUMX I watched the speech and the answers of the gdp at the congress of the CCI, you know, I was proud that we have so many talented, patriotic, smart people rooting for RUSSIA, how many sensible proposals were made by them, it is only worrying that these proposals had to be made by the government, the Duma, it turns out thousands of officials in the government, XNUMX deputies simply do not fulfill their duties if what the participants in the congress proposed simply lies on the surface, it turns out that the government represented by the Duma, the government what experts, experts, politicians and even the simple PEOPLE are talking about is the complete absence of professionalism, bordering on criminal negligence and there are many examples of this, if you can be Proud for the participants in the congress, then your PROFESSIONALISM can be said below the baseboard, as the people say , you look at the actions of the government, sluggish paranoia, they’ll drown any good decision, they’ll talk. But these smart, talented, patriotic people are not allowed into power, but the prime minister in his speeches holds the thesis that there are no frames for us, FRAMES there are NO authorities’s desires to allow smart and honest people to power.
  37. -14
    2 March 2016 09: 06
    Quote: Burmeister
    Zadolbali !!!!
    Is it really that bullshit that was hammered into your heads under the name "ECONOMY" with strange "laws" that work only for a certain circle of people, so firmly stuck in the minds ??? It is high time to understand that the rules of the game are tailored for specific people and if something goes wrong, the rules are changed by them.
    We live in a SELF-SUFFICIENT country. By and large, we ourselves can develop very well. And we don't need "financial injections".
    After the country was plunged into perestroika, this "sabbath" continues to this day. We were initially set the conditions for us to degrade. Look, in our country it makes no sense to engage in production, scientific activities, they kill us for what year education (they kill very competently), medicine, production, scientific centers. Why? Yes, because in the government there are TRAITORS and ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE. Because there are no tough decisions on this matter. Judges - for the most part venal or under the influence - act as a tool for unpunished lawlessness. What's far to go? Here, the GDP recently issued that "our economy will remain LIBERAL and EVERYTHING IS CLOSED." Do you seriously think that this is a reasonable person? And how can you even call him a man after that?
    Today, we are on the verge of a great war, NATO has already approached our borders directly from all sides, provocations will soon begin. If they get into us, it will be a TOTAL annihilation of everyone and everything. Therefore, you need to understand what awaits us and accordingly respond to it.
    There is still the opportunity to prevent a war, if you do not allow unrest to stir up within the country, to make it strong and strong. And for this you need to do a lot of things. It is only visible that everything is only getting worse.
    For a long time I do not believe what certain politicians tell us from the zombie man. These are dolls. Now God is money. Everything is possible for money. Even betray. Everything is very simple.


    It's simple.
    Russia is an occupied country.
    In fact, now is the third occupation period.
    First: Bolshoi, from Peter (German geek) to the Zionist coup of 1917.
    Second: Medium, from 1917 to 1991.
    Third: Small, from 1991 to the present.
    1. +5
      2 March 2016 10: 31
      What place is Peter 1 a German geek. You are more careful with the demonstration of your erudition, and even the rest of your theses will be perceived as this.
      1. 0
        2 March 2016 15: 36
        The entire Romanov-Zakharyin-Yuryev dynasty is German, pro-Westernist, starting from the first - Mikhail Feodorovich Romanov (Zakharyin-Yuryev).
      2. -2
        2 March 2016 15: 36
        The entire Romanov-Zakharyin-Yuryev dynasty is German, pro-Westernist, starting from the first - Mikhail Feodorovich Romanov (Zakharyin-Yuryev).
    2. The comment was deleted.
  38. +18
    2 March 2016 09: 15
    If Putin were really interested in the revival of Russia, he would change the situation, but for now we only see how his friends from the cooperative and the KGB / FSB and his son-in-law become dollar billionaires. And as a minister of economics, controlled and accountable to Putin, he is going to cut spending on medicine.
  39. 0
    2 March 2016 09: 25
    While the articles write that we do not like it, we want a fair attitude to the whole country, and not just to those who are at the trough. But if it continues to continue as it is, then instead of lengthy articles and explaining something, there will simply be appeals like: kill the official - save Russia or take all the oligarchs and their relatives hostage until they return EVERYTHING, etc. And there is Maidan in Moscow. What, in fact, the partners are seeking.
    And did someone go to the lack of medicine in the hospital? When I didn’t receive the document and all the papers were returned without giving reasons, so that they could be eliminated immediately, and not to get over the whole pile, did someone write a claim? You can endlessly write who did not do something, did not demand, did not respond to the irresponsibility of those responsible. Now, when we start ALL of us, at least from the management companies (they’re nearby and the jambs are not always rude in their way), toss them with letters, to send unsubscribes to higher authorities with an appropriate statement of our dissatisfaction, then we will go to the district authorities, etc. before the presidential administration in five years. Only in this way we will save the country, and we will not show to all brothers that dignity is with us, and they have not a country, but a barn.
    Or should the guarantor make appeals for us in all cases of violation of our rights? There is also Federal Law N59FZ of 2006 "On the Procedure for Considering Appeals from Citizens of the Russian Federation". Only when each of us begins to act within the framework of all laws and regulations, and they exist in all spheres of activity, then many people will want to remain officials, and officials will appear responsible, and not fattened at the trough. People should stop being the electorate, but show everyone that for every shortcoming, inaction, simply arrogance there will be a complaint, followed by a check and organizational conclusions - this will be a revolution of addiction, and not a platform for marasmus in the form of Maidan.
    And then, Kudrin, Kasyanov, Chubak ... Themselves what?
  40. +10
    2 March 2016 09: 30
    Quote: Sensatus
    Yes, the principle "everything that does not kill us makes us stronger" cannot be canceled

    Yes, how much can you live by this principle!?! Why it is impossible to stand on the rails of the planned development of the country?
    All in general, it is logical for the maintenance and protection of the pipe does not need a large population and the worries associated with it. You do not need developed medicine, you do not need a normal education, and you do not need to deal with demography, provide housing, kindergartens.
  41. +13
    2 March 2016 09: 41
    I read the first two paragraphs. And immediately the thought: what a correct comparison! Russia - and Saudi Arabia. Both have immeasurable forests, Baikals full of drinking water, diamonds almost under the capitals, and it's a shame to talk about other minerals. Well, the Saudis' nuclear industry is one of the best in the world, that's understandable. Again, they make the best weapons in the world. For example, the tank "Dromedary-15" is a two-humped .. that is, two-turret ...
    Yes. So that's it. If the Saudis hadn't cut down their taiga, if they hadn't drunk their Baikal, if they hadn't sold their chernozems to the Swedes, if ... What else is there? Oh, yes, if they had people for whom "give only an ax and mittens ..." - N.V. Gogol - then, probably, only oil flows could be compared. And even then ... the light fractions with the heavy ones are somehow not comme il faut. Yes, the former burn better. But .. "You can also drown with banknotes" - DI Mendeleev. Then yes - some would be happy if only 10 million oil workers stayed in Russia, and better than 5. However, we lived for 70 years behind the "Iron Curtain", and if it hadn't decided to stick out because of it, we probably would have lived and beyond. And especially if they didn’t help the whole world “build socialism”, but would concentrate on one separate country - our own. Then, probably, neither perestroika would have been needed, nor the counter-revolution in 91.
    Well, now I’ll try to read the article. Perhaps I was wrong in something. Although it is unlikely ...
  42. +5
    2 March 2016 09: 51
    This gives the impression that it is in the government of the extra 80% of people. Only Shoigu and Lavrov really work for the country. What the rest of the members (the right word) of the government are doing remains a mystery. At the same time, members regularly receive awards for performing especially important tasks. According to the Federal State Statistics Service, the salary of civil servants increased by 2015% in 2, despite the fact that ordinary civil servants began to receive 2-10% less, and the SC reduced the salary by 57% (which is the case with them). Well, who got these 2 average percent?
    1. +3
      2 March 2016 10: 36
      Judging by the fact that Russia is in a complete diplomatic vacuum, Lavrov is also a minus
    2. 0
      2 March 2016 10: 36
      Judging by the fact that Russia is in a complete diplomatic vacuum, Lavrov is also a minus
      1. -2
        2 March 2016 12: 02
        Judging by the fact that Russia is in a complete diplomatic vacuum, Lavrov is also a minus,
        Did Klimkin tell you this? Or did they figure it out?
        1. +3
          2 March 2016 12: 19
          Nicaragua for us and some islands there
        2. The comment was deleted.
  43. +13
    2 March 2016 09: 53
    "The facts are irrefutable evidence that all this abomination, sanctions and crisis will ultimately play into the hands of the domestic economy." - Nonsense !!! Those who rule will never untie the country's economy from the export of resources - FOR FREE! There is nothing to build for a long time, no where your hard-earned money (yes, you think that they are "state" laughing ) do not have to invest, and then wait a long time for self-sufficiency and profit. Even if the price of oil, gas, timber, steel and other tradable resources drops to the bottom they will soon suck out all the oil and gas, cut down all the wood and develop all the deposits, but they will not invest a dime in any production !!!
    1. +1
      2 March 2016 12: 31
      Recently, Gazprombank took Uralmash under its wing, repaid the company's debts and began to modernize production, with your statement that no one will invest in production - somehow it does not fit, and those who rule over us are not engaged in production - it is not in their jurisdiction, they can only act as co-investors, pass laws, and businessmen and entrepreneurs are engaged in production.
  44. +2
    2 March 2016 09: 55
    Quote: domokl
    Very controversial article. But a plus set. In the USSR, only 10% of the budget was received from oil, but today? It is necessary to return production ... Stop being a raw materials appendage

    So etozh have to work, and not sit in the office! After all, in Korea and on vacation it is considered a shame to go! And we believe that “going to work every morning is, if not a feat, then something heroic in it”) And they agree to this only for a large salary. But then the cost of the final product rises. And the factories will become useless to anyone. Vicious circle. Sarcasm of course, though ...
    1. +4
      2 March 2016 10: 00
      Wildly sorry. And to work it is necessary to dig a ditch. You can’t work in the office. IMHO respected by you Korea - to a large extent works on offices
      1. +2
        2 March 2016 18: 30
        Quote: Kenneth
        Wildly sorry. And to work it is necessary to dig a ditch. You can’t work in the office.

        Eka news, as it was in the Soviet time, the deceased grandmother blamed "You young people should press all the buttons, you would have worked ..." :-) I then worked as an electrician of station communication facilities :-)
    2. The comment was deleted.
  45. -2
    2 March 2016 10: 01
    They forgot Anatoly Borisovich Chubais! All that was entrusted to him: privatization, reform of RAO UES, the leadership of RosNano - he completed all these projects to the end and in the shortest possible time, as the management required. This is recognized even by his political enemies! So that he has the full moral right to claim the title of the most effective Russian official. And the fact that many do not like his work is already a topic for another discussion.

    Chubais is a complete analogue of Trotsky. It was Trotsky, the emissary of the World Government, who organized the victory of Zionism in Russia. Stalin was able to get rid of Trotsky by exchanging him for a gold dime, but he remained dependent on the Zionists. Got rid of Trotsky, but not of the Trotskyists. Which destroyed both him (Stalin) and the country.
    1. -1
      2 March 2016 10: 49
      This dependence is not known since when. It will weaken and increase.
  46. +6
    2 March 2016 10: 04
    "The facts irrefutably show that all this abomination, sanctions and the crisis will ultimately play into the hands of the domestic economy. Russia will be right for the hundredth time. We have no extra people."

    While liberals are sitting in the Kremlin, on Okhotny Ryad and in the building on Krasnopresnenskaya embankment, and not in the Mordovian camps, Russia does not expect anything good.
    1. +6
      2 March 2016 10: 11
      Quote: Pomoryanin
      While liberals are sitting in the Kremlin, on Okhotny Ryad and in the building on Krasnopresnenskaya embankment, and not in the Mordovian camps, Russia does not expect anything good.

      subscribe!
      1. +9
        2 March 2016 10: 21
        Again "good tsar, bad boyars"? Not tired?
        1. -1
          2 March 2016 14: 14
          Quote: Kolka82
          Again "good tsar, bad boyars"? Not tired?

          I did not understand sarcasm.
          1. 0
            3 March 2016 08: 52
            Have mercy, what sarcasm is there. I’m talking about http://rusrand.ru/. Although I used to think differently.
  47. -4
    2 March 2016 10: 30
    Another draft (drain) threshing floor. Judging by the number of comments, the drain was a success.

    Volumes of Russian oil production (10 million barrels per day) correspond to the indices of its production in Saudi Arabia. The population of the Saudis - 32 million people. The population of the Russian Federation - 144 million people.

    You can continue to grimace at evening talk shows, proving that everything will be even better, but the structure of the domestic economy clearly indicates a paradoxical and frightening situation. In the conditions of the “Kudrino” economy in Russia, it is advisable to live no more than thirty million people. All the rest - excess ballast hanging from a stone at the neck of Rosneft

    - what is "Kudrinskaya economy"
    - why did the av (ff) torus get the idea that she was exactly "Kudrinskaya"?
    - compare Saudi with the Russian Federation ... br-rrrr ... it's like a sloth with an elephant, about fellow
    - the author learned to solve equations with one unknown (oil in the Russian Federation: X = oil in Saudi: Saudi population, where X is the "useful population of the Russian Federation")
    - the equation, however, is initially crooked

    Why the equation is crooked:

    Saudi, except oil, does not produce anything. Blaming !!! NOTHING. Everything else is purchased.

    Find three differences with the Russian Federation.

    Creative - (censorship), author - (censorship).

    IMHO
  48. +12
    2 March 2016 10: 36
    "- The gold and foreign exchange reserves of the Russian Federation are not intended to solve current economic problems," said Russian President Vladimir Putin at a meeting with Russian businessmen.
    "Gold and foreign exchange reserves are intended for other purposes," Reuters quoted the president as saying.

    I wonder what kind of currency investments are not carried out, i.e. they do not spend on maintaining the ruble, investments in the production sector, too, banks to capitalize or what?
  49. +2
    2 March 2016 10: 49
    A rational anti-crisis plan is a gradual refusal to export any raw materials. Enough Have played enough.

    Production should be limited - only to cover their own needs and accelerate the development of domestic industry.

    Why not sell? Oil is also a commodity. Another thing is that it is not necessary to focus on exporting raw materials only.
    1. +2
      2 March 2016 12: 37
      You can already start drinking water, like oil, to sell, in the world every year the need for drinking water will grow exponentially.
      1. +7
        2 March 2016 15: 04
        .... I can’t understand why you are ready to sell everything that we inherited from our ancestors ... coal, metal, wood, oil, gas .... in
        1. 0
          2 March 2016 17: 57
          And what to look at all this and sit without money - you can’t sell the forest here.
        2. 0
          5 March 2016 03: 31
          Quote: Shpagolom
          ... I can’t understand why you are ready to sell everything that we inherited from our ancestors ...


          We don’t sell ... we don’t have anything ... but we are not able to influence those with paisas, who suddenly turned out to be Chubais’s magic wand, because of a lack of common interests and an acute desire for happiness for their children .. .Otherwise, normally-developed people would have long given a neck to those who climbed it ...
  50. -1
    2 March 2016 10: 49
    Here some users have raised questions of the History of Russia: Nix 1986, ignoto, Mikhail. I answer, with regards to history ... The militias in the army of Minin and Prince Pozharsky (Time of Troubles), who received considerable money while there, were "sponsored" not by Russian merchants and boyars, but by the British, who also "sponsored" the election of the first Russian tsar from the teip, excuse me, the seedy boyar family of the Romanovs. In return, they received exemption from customs duties on their goods imported into Russia for many years. From that time, dear ignoto, the seizure of the brits began through the introduction of the Romanovs in Russia. My answer is Nix 1986, regarding Peter 1. I hate this character from the Romanov family. It must be said right away that he was not prepared for the kingdom and he became the emperor by chance. What did he do on a "business trip" in Europe? Pederasty? lived with his fellow tribesmen like a pig? Studied carpentry and shipbuilding, or attended local universities? And before Peter, Russian merchants did not go on their ships with goods to Spitsbergen and Persia? And it's nothing that the ENTIRE fleet, built by SLAVE labor from the RAW FOREST, rotted at the quay wall, without firing a single shot? And the construction of St. Petersburg (name from the Apostle Peter), during which a third of Russia was killed? And you do not know that according to the Treaty of Ninshtad between Sweden and Russia and for 2 million gold efimks, ALL the Baltic states, with population and cities, were bought. Who could have prevented from making Russian Riga a port or a window? And the planting of vodka, tobacco? And the rape of the church in all perverted ways? And what do we celebrate thanks to Peter since 1700? 1700 years ago in Bethlehem, the circumcision of the foreskin of Christ according to the JEWISH TRADITIONS took place! NEW YEAR RUSSIA ALWAYS CELEBRATED ON MARCH 1 FROM THE CREATION OF THE WORLD 7525 TODAY! Here is such a scum from the Romanov family.
    1. 0
      2 March 2016 11: 20
      Such statements as yours are customary to provide with references, especially about Minin and Pozharsky pliz. And by the way, are you against the expulsion of the Poles by the militia from Moscow? Who sponsors you then?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      2 March 2016 13: 29
      The fact that Peter 1 was a drunkard and died from complications of gonorrhea does not diminish the fact that he laid the foundations of statehood for the next 200 years. One victory over Sweden is worth the development of the Urals. Ebn only knew how to thump and steal, so the whole Expocentre was opened for him. We have been talking a lot and for a long time about the crisis and the ways out of it, and these ways have been invented and given to us by history so much that would be enough for half the planet. But WHO is still there, because the persons responsible for this are satisfied with everything. The fact that all this import substitution is sheer clowning was enough recently to look at the embarrassment with the program for overcoming the crisis, they did not consider the budget of 130 billion rubles. Sorry, such a value is not some kind of statistical error, but in fact, the list in its stupidity and work on "fuck off".
    4. -1
      3 March 2016 08: 09
      Quote: user3970
      Here, some users raised questions of the History of Russia: Nix 1986, ignoto, Mikhail. I answer with regards to history ...

      ... I am wildly sorry, your name is not Nosovsky-Fomenko, an hour? ...
      conspiracy therapist ... personal friend of Clio, the goddess of history ...
      1. 0
        4 March 2016 11: 42
        I am not a historian. I will not blame anyone unfounded or sing the praises of the royal estate, only two facts about this palace leapfrog always raised my questions. Why "Russia was unlucky for tsars", as Syromyatnikov said from the famous film:
        -And in general ... after Peter I ... Russia was very unlucky
        on kings, this is my personal opinion

        and in connection with what high moral standards did most of them not live to a very old age?
        what
    5. 0
      4 March 2016 22: 32
      [quote = user3970] that they did not prepare him for the kingdom and he became the emperor by chance [/ quote]
      Tell us about the emperors in pre-Petrine Russia? [Quote = user3970] What did he do on a "business trip" in Europe? Pederasty? lived with his fellow tribesmen like a pig? Studied carpentry and shipbuilding or studied at local universities? [/ Quote]
      The worst thing is brain pederasty negative [quote = user3970]
      And before Peter the Russian merchants did not go on their ships with goods to Svalbard and Persia? [/ Quote]
      Tell us about the economic value of Spitsbergen during the existence of pre-Petrine Russia? Are there any plaintive letters from Russian merchants in orders to the grandfather and father of Peter I about the "successful" and "safe" trade with Persia, after the capture of Baku and the development of ferrous metallurgy in Russia, do you think it worsened?
      [quote = user3970] Is it nothing that the ENTIRE fleet, built by SLAVE labor from RAW FOREST, rotted near the mooring wall without firing a single shot? [/ quote]
      You either twist, or you don’t know the history, but in passing insulted all generations of St. Petersburg shipbuilders, and in particular the "Admiralty Shipyards" - the successor, heir of the Peter the Great Admiralty. The Petrovsky fleet rotted later under Peter II.
      [quote = user3970] And the construction of St. Petersburg (the name from the Apostle Peter), in which they ruined a third of Russia? [/ quote]
      Every city dweller who has studied at a city school knows that Peter gave the name of St. Petersburg to the city with an encrypted meaning and did not honor anyone, the Holy Stone Fortress is deciphered and "as you name the ship, so it will float." MORE THAN 300 YEARS. For a third of Russia, I had conversations with archaeologists who have been digging all their lives Leningrad / Petersburg, Petersburg was built by a huge number of free people, there were state officials, there were serfs taken away, but neither one nor the other were slaves, and the "fortress" under Peter the Great was not yet " fortress "under Catherine the Great, although not the same as under Ivan III, they constantly, like modern guest workers, rotated, the main reasons for the death of workers are the first typhus, typhoid fever, the second floods, all other reasons with a great lag.
      [quote = user3970] And you do not know that under the Ninstad Treaty between Sweden and Russia and for 2 million gold Efimks, the whole Baltic States with population and cities was bought. Who could have prevented Russian Riga from being made a port or window?
      Did you look at the years of the annexation of the lands, the beginning of the end of the Northern War, its events, the date of the foundation of St. Petersburg? About Russian Riga, it's like anyone today said "why did they make Crimea Our, why do we need Sevastopol, because we can keep the fleet right in the Mediterranean Sea, in Russian Tartus"
      [quote = user3970] Who could interfere with making a port or window a Russian Riga? And the planting of vodka, tobacco? [/ Quote]
      The only thing I agree with is that vodka and "hellish nigatsiana" were known even before Peter, but that was a sin, and tobacco was also illegal (smoking was punishable by pulling out nostrils)
      [quote = user3970] And the rape of the church in all perverted ways? And what do we celebrate thanks to Peter from 1700? 1700 years ago in Bethlehem there was circumcision of the foreskin of Christ IN JEWISH TRADITIONS! NEW YEAR RUSSIA ALWAYS CELEBRATED MARCH 1 FROM CREATION OF THE WORLD 7525 YEAR TODAY! Here is such filth from the Romanov family. [/ Quote]
      Well, you either remove the cross, or put on your underpants, do you not confuse our with the Armenian Apostolic Church? this is their main holiday circumcision of Jesus Christ, it is celebrated later than Christmas. am
  51. +1
    2 March 2016 10: 50
    Yes, yes, it’s simple, let’s take and spend $3,5 trillion, but where will we get it from? Let's start churning out iPhones, Samsungs, etc. consumer goods, but who will we sell to? To yourself? Or do you think China, Apple, Samsung will gladly move forward to give Russia a place in the sun? I agree with some things about the ban on oil exports, but with some things I don’t. It is necessary to make more duties for the export of raw materials, and less for processed products, and not ban them
  52. +1
    2 March 2016 10: 58
    Without noise and dust, Russia took 5th-6th place in terms of GDP in the world. The economy has held up against the backdrop of the decline of the economies of all developing countries. It depends less and less on oil prices. The ruble is strengthening. Oil is growing, thank God. There is no need to slide into the swamp of pessimism, although I myself am a sinner. Apparently, we cannot solve internal problems without first solving external ones.
    1. +1
      4 March 2016 11: 52
      (+) For optimism. Our country has everything. If we now secure our food supply and begin to systematically, day by day, get rid of the rape of our native nature, then the development of the defense industry and the processing of resources will give us the opportunity to live comfortably for many years. I won’t repeat myself about the reserves of fresh water, clean air and land...
      And there is no need to get carried away with external problems. There are acute and painful ones - we need help in resolving them. And harness...??? First of all, the state, working on our taxes, which according to the Constitution is given the right to wisely rule and act for the benefit of the Fatherland, must ensure normal (by all standards) living conditions for its own citizens. So that people in their own country are not outcasts...
  53. +3
    2 March 2016 11: 03
    "Under the conditions of the Kudrin economy" ////

    Why "Kudrinskaya"?
    Who promised in 2000 that Russia would turn
    into an "energy superpower"? Kudrin?

    I think someone else...
    1. 0
      4 March 2016 12: 00
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Who promised in 2000 that Russia would turn
      into an "energy superpower"?...


      And before 2000 (1991) Russia was an energy “rickets”? Yes, if anyone said something, it could only be GDP and he should have said this: “In the XNUMXst century, Russia must remain the largest energy power”... If Kudrin said something, it was only about money and why should they be invested in US securities and how great is it to store gold and foreign exchange reserves there without spending it either on industrial development or on the development of the social sphere, but only on additional capitalization and other “Kudrinovism” (today – Silanovism)...
  54. +3
    2 March 2016 11: 49
    An accountant SHOULD NOT make political decisions. The Kudrins-Siluanovs are simply arithmometers at the level of collective farm accounting. Ministers must be politicians.
    1. +1
      4 March 2016 12: 06
      After their manipulations with the budget and spending of funds, the first should have been left to serve 22 years, and the second should simply have refused, citing poor theoretical and practical knowledge. And now I have to dry the crackers, prepare a change of linen and take my assets to the treasury... laughing
  55. +1
    2 March 2016 12: 15
    Quote: varov14
    It is a pity that our army is also the same corrupt, and so could, would have carried out a coup in favor of Russia. No maidan and a minimum of blood.


    In Ukraine, the army ensured the coup. And what? Fine? Didn't teach you anything? And there is no need to blame the army. I didn’t sign up to shoot my own people, even those who thought differently. If you are not satisfied with something, get your ass off the couch and do it. Sami.

    And one more question for filling: if you are so smart, explain why I should shoot not at you, but at someone else and why?
    1. +1
      2 March 2016 12: 58
      Quote: gv2000
      In Ukraine, the army ensured the coup.

      Are you confusing anything?
      It seems like not much time has passed yet...
  56. +3
    2 March 2016 12: 51
    Life goes on. Remember: “Chubais: We have a lot of money! There are quite a lot of them...”?
    And now. “The head of Rusnano, Anatoly Chubais, sent a letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin in which he asks to allocate 89 billion rubles from the National Welfare Fund (NWF) to create a Russian-Indian fund.” http://rusvesna.su/economy/1456910776
    1. +2
      2 March 2016 17: 58
      Looks like these “Lots of money” - Ryzhik “lost it”.
  57. +1
    2 March 2016 13: 19
    Quote: user3970
    Here some users have raised questions of the History of Russia: Nix 1986, ignoto, Mikhail. I answer, with regards to history ... The militias in the army of Minin and Prince Pozharsky (Time of Troubles), who received considerable money while there, were "sponsored" not by Russian merchants and boyars, but by the British, who also "sponsored" the election of the first Russian tsar from the teip, excuse me, the seedy boyar family of the Romanovs. In return, they received exemption from customs duties on their goods imported into Russia for many years. From that time, dear ignoto, the seizure of the brits began through the introduction of the Romanovs in Russia. My answer is Nix 1986, regarding Peter 1. I hate this character from the Romanov family. It must be said right away that he was not prepared for the kingdom and he became the emperor by chance. What did he do on a "business trip" in Europe? Pederasty? lived with his fellow tribesmen like a pig? Studied carpentry and shipbuilding, or attended local universities? And before Peter, Russian merchants did not go on their ships with goods to Spitsbergen and Persia? And it's nothing that the ENTIRE fleet, built by SLAVE labor from the RAW FOREST, rotted at the quay wall, without firing a single shot? And the construction of St. Petersburg (name from the Apostle Peter), during which a third of Russia was killed? And you do not know that according to the Treaty of Ninshtad between Sweden and Russia and for 2 million gold efimks, ALL the Baltic states, with population and cities, were bought. Who could have prevented from making Russian Riga a port or a window? And the planting of vodka, tobacco? And the rape of the church in all perverted ways? And what do we celebrate thanks to Peter since 1700? 1700 years ago in Bethlehem, the circumcision of the foreskin of Christ according to the JEWISH TRADITIONS took place! NEW YEAR RUSSIA ALWAYS CELEBRATED ON MARCH 1 FROM THE CREATION OF THE WORLD 7525 TODAY! Here is such a scum from the Romanov family.


    Regarding Peter and the so-called Romanovs, I advise you to read Alexander Kasenko’s “The Collapse of the Empire of the Russian Tsars.”
    1. +1
      4 March 2016 12: 12
      Quote: ignoto
      I advise you to read Alexander Kasenko...


      Alexander Kasenko - Who is it? Did he live during his reign and keep chronicles, or is this another personal view and opinion on Russian history?
  58. +1
    2 March 2016 13: 39
    Regarding the events of 1612, which I indicated in my comment above, I found a good article
    http://www.razlib.ru/istorija/den_narodnogo_edinstva_biografija_prazdnika/p4.php
  59. +3
    2 March 2016 15: 02
    The existence of 80% Russians inappropriate for the economy

    In other words, not the economy for Russians, for the people, but the people for the economy! This is the plan of Western civilization and our home-grown pro-Western lib..al trash in relation to Russia, its place in the world according to their plan for the international division of labor, when Russia will only be allowed to provide the West with supplies of raw materials, for which 20% of Russians will be enough! The remaining 80% of Russians should NOT FIT into the market of the international division of labor, since the West absolutely does NOT NEED any development of industry, high technology, in general, any other Russian economy, except for raw materials, which would ensure the existence of these 80% of Russians!
    1. 0
      2 March 2016 18: 00
      We have already gone through all this - there will be no return to the old ways.
  60. +1
    2 March 2016 17: 13
    Quote: Diana Ilyina
    I liked everything in your comment, except for this one!
    Quote: Daniel
    And certainly no "mask shows" on the territory of neighboring states and similar upheavals, money loves silence.


    As I understand it, you mean our mythical troops in Ukraine ?! No, I completely admit the presence of our military consultants and the like, but who inspired you that money loves silence ?! Judging by the mattresses, money is loved by those who print it and fight for them around the world, and silence is not visible and close! Yes, right, money likes to be where it is quiet, but where it is quiet, it makes loud all over the planet! And until the mattress covers are destroyed, there will be nothing good. Carthage phishington must be destroyed!

    So they fight half a planet away from their borders.
  61. +1
    2 March 2016 18: 18
    we have become so strong
    that there's nowhere else to go
    and everything that doesn't kill us
    doesn't kill us and everything

    from internet
  62. +2
    2 March 2016 19: 30
    As the Japanese minister proudly declared: our only wealth is our people. Nothing else matters. \\\\\
    And (to our) So-called...well, generally bad people
    unlucky and they got the wrong country and population
    otherwise they would be wow.
    Tv.ri
    1. +1
      2 March 2016 20: 07
      People are our only resource. It turns out that it can be exhausted, or may already be exhausted.
  63. +1
    2 March 2016 20: 05
    Lumberjacks, let's "give the oak" ahead of schedule!
  64. +3
    2 March 2016 20: 06
    The country and the people who inhabit it, presented to the world an endless list of technical inventions and discoveries - Russia. She deserves more than the honorary title of "northern gas station."

    A rational anti-crisis plan is a gradual refusal to export any raw materials. Enough Have played enough.

    Production should be limited - only to cover their own needs and accelerate the development of domestic industry.
    I’ve been screaming about this at VO for a long time. I have long been saying that it’s all about the social system and the social lawlessness of those who stole power.

    The facts irrefutably show that all this abomination, sanctions and crisis will ultimately play into the hands of the domestic economy. Russia for the hundredth time will be right. We do not have extra people.
    There is - and this is “our” power.
  65. 0
    2 March 2016 20: 31
    Impossible. For a country's economy of 80 percent, could this be below or above the norm?
  66. +2
    2 March 2016 20: 59
    The article is correct, except for the last two lines... There is a great risk that the “abomination” will migrate to other sectors of the economy, hanging its corporate debts on the budget of the Russian Federation...
    1. 0
      2 March 2016 22: 36
      In 4-6 years we will completely emerge from the crisis; we have already been through all this.
  67. +1
    3 March 2016 09: 03
    A good and necessary article... It makes you think about a lot...
  68. VB
    +3
    3 March 2016 12: 07
    We don’t have extra people; we have an extra government, the leadership of the central bank.
  69. +2
    3 March 2016 12: 51
    Lately they have often been screaming about the foolish crests who are trying to sell off their black soils for next to nothing. How far have we in Russia come from idiots when we set oil production records in times of crisis?
    1. +3
      3 March 2016 13: 08
      Late with the question. A decision was made not to increase production. And Sechin suggested reducing it.
      In reality, everything is more complicated than it seems.

      I can write an article of more than 20 pages, but the meaning can be summed up in one phrase: we cannot manage the debit of our oil and gas fields without significant economic losses.

      Therefore, the only way to manage is a strategic reserve. The USA and China actively use it, the USSR too. Now the situation is not very clear, I can only say that a very significant part of the strategic storage facilities ended up on the territory of Ukraine and Belarus. Actually, in central Russia, I probably know 2 gas and one oil storage facilities, whether they are empty or complete secrets and thank God.
  70. 0
    3 March 2016 13: 13
    Quote: Daniel
    You will have to get up from your knees with very modest capital, which would be better spent on the development of science and education, otherwise it is very fun to work with young specialists, it feels like universities are not preparing a professional, but an interesting person.

    Before spending money on science and education, it is necessary to pass a law according to which a specialist who has received education on a budgetary basis is obliged to work in his specialty for a certain period of time, for example, 5 years, and only then has the right to go abroad, otherwise it turns out that companies keep track of smart people even in their second year guys and then pull them in, as a result, having received an education for budget money, they go to improve the science and economy of the states, Germany, and others... Provide these guys with real work in their specialty as young specialists, and give at least a more or less normal salary .
  71. 0
    3 March 2016 13: 24
    The author is a custom-made balabol, a low-quality blog propagandist.
    Why? Because he is trying to convince us that for the last 15 years the country was led by A. Kudrin and M. Kasyanov, and not by our Great President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin - may the gods reward him for his labors!
  72. 0
    3 March 2016 14: 14
    Quote: spiriolla-xnumx
    The whole liberal establishment wants a well-fed and peaceful life, and we interfere with them. In general, the worse the better. I am grateful to the amers for the sanctions, may they be eternal, and if Putin does not change the government and the country's development course, the electoral mass will wake up and replace it. Only hardships make us unite and understand that we are all people, not cattle.

    I agree with your judgments. Our *elites* are asleep and see the lifting of sanctions, oil will rise - budget sawers will perk up (the risks of lifting in mid-to-late 2016 are increasing). Doing nothing for the long-term development of the country, only stating facts and strengthening propaganda (the West is to blame - we are fluffy and patriotic).
  73. 0
    3 March 2016 16: 06
    Quote: satris
    Yes, "Orsk" worked for 40 years - in 1968 it was bought.

    "Orsk" was purchased in 1966, it still works at my father's dacha, sometimes the milk in the lower compartment freezes.
  74. 0
    3 March 2016 19: 52
    A parody of the title of the article.
    And I keep wondering, why are we still living and living? Advanced civilizations, that is, we, dug everything up, rolled it into concrete and asphalt. We’ve set up a great many birdhouses, we’ll open the window and we’ll smoke, we won’t get high (that’s understandable, you won’t get high before you die), we won’t breathe (how long is there left to breathe, we need to breathe in), smoking factories and factories. They built tanks, missiles, bombs, so that if something happened, there would be a bloody battle, well, you have to defend your dignity and sovereignty. We fly on rattling iron birds, we drive lumbering cars sneezing oil over potholes and pits (why do it better? It’s all the same). With trembling hands they move colored pieces of paper with symbols of past stories and civilizations from pocket to pocket. Around the cities, graveyards and cemeteries are growing at an accelerated pace, you can’t even glance at them. So they came up with a super game of the golden billion, it turns out that this is healthy competition between the species and subspecies of living beings existing on the planet. So this is pure Darwinism! And it’s simpler - he who laughs last laughs... There is such a socio-philosophical science fiction novel by Ivan Efremov “The Hour of the Ox”, there, I read almost about this golden billion back in childhood, it must be ingrained in my memory.
  75. DPN
    0
    3 March 2016 21: 00
    Only a planned economy can pull Russia out of the crisis; only it can feed the population of Russia, but not like the market. The market is beneficial only to OLIGARCHS - capitalists. The market is unemployment, drug addiction and housing in slums.
  76. 0
    3 March 2016 21: 14
    In Russia everything is not simple! a tunnel to Crimea would be cheaper, but then the rollback would be less! there is no point in building a normal economy when you can just take a piece of the money pie! those who make decisions think this way, they are doing well now, and they have money and children settled abroad. and we are their electorate......
  77. 0
    4 March 2016 05: 48
    Then such an economy is worthless!
  78. 0
    4 March 2016 08: 24
    Quote: Diana Ilyina
    I liked everything in your comment, except for this one!
    Quote: Daniel
    And certainly no "mask shows" on the territory of neighboring states and similar upheavals, money loves silence.


    As I understand it, you mean our mythical troops in Ukraine ?! No, I completely admit the presence of our military consultants and the like, but who inspired you that money loves silence ?! Judging by the mattresses, money is loved by those who print it and fight for them around the world, and silence is not visible and close! Yes, right, money likes to be where it is quiet, but where it is quiet, it makes loud all over the planet! And until the mattress covers are destroyed, there will be nothing good. Carthage phishington must be destroyed!

    Carthage, as I understand it, is the USA?...and do you seriously think that it can be destroyed?)))) (I’m not talking about nuclear weapons) - but about economic power...for some reason we believed (from what binge) that the USA this is just a money machine that produces green paper...ALS this is not so....Heavy engineering, aerospace technologies, etc....look how many American brands are used by the WHOLE world....I don’t like US politics, but I can’t compete with this a monster today (and tomorrow) is not realistic
  79. 0
    4 March 2016 09: 35
    Our “economists” in power need to learn economic history, including the section where they talk about such a measure as protectionism. Countries all over the world still use it, although they broadcast curses against it.
  80. The comment was deleted.
  81. 0
    4 March 2016 10: 37
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    Look at many European countries.

    I can’t talk about all European countries, but I can give an example of the territories of the former GDR and its agriculture.
    Former agricultural cooperatives (in the majority) were transformed into LLCs i.e. GmbH. Led by local or foreign SPECIALISTS - farmers, livestock breeders with university education. These agricultural firms, even in crisis conditions, produce and are not unprofitable.
    In Russia, collective farms were destroyed or handed over to temporary workers and speculators, and specialists who understood something in agriculture flocked to the cities or simply drank themselves to death from despair.
    "Realtor" is a buzzword that defines a large group of people who do not produce anything. Maybe “realtor” is important, but you need to produce, and not hang around, goods produced mainly abroad.
    We need to not only talk about “import substitution”, but actually do something!
    This applies not only to agriculture.
    Western sanctions are a reason to think!
    As they used to say there? - “If thunder doesn’t strike, a man won’t cross himself!”
  82. 0
    4 March 2016 11: 32
    Russia will be right for the hundredth time. We don't have extra people.


    There really are no extra people in Russia. Here are the ghoul officials offering people a place to live on meager wages or unemployment; creatures who corrupt youth with drugs and smoking mixtures; The number of liberals muddying the waters and offering to surrender to America’s mercy is not decreasing...

    Just recently, 36 healthy, hard-working men passed away. 36 families were orphaned. Children were left without fathers... Believe me, not everyone will climb a kilometer deep for 30 rubles instead of them... And I didn’t see a single worker with sidelocks either there, at Severnaya, or here, at Raspadskaya. ..
  83. 0
    4 March 2016 15: 03
    Quote: Diana Ilyina
    money likes to be where it is quiet, but where it is quiet it makes noise all over the planet!


    Graham Greene has your back. "The Quiet American" 1955
  84. 0
    4 March 2016 16: 07
    I agree about the Congo.
    No Congo - no civilization (Western type).
    If there is no Iturup Island, then there is no rhenium.
    No rhenium - no super-achievements in the Big Space.

    Let me insert a paragraph from my novel “The Last President”:

    - Reny. The most dispersed element in the earth's crust. It is five times less than gold, and the price reaches nine hundred dollars per gram! The Chilean company Molymet and deposits in Utah almost satisfy the market's needs, but Kuril rhenium is something!
    If the Mormons extract rhenium from copper, spending up to six hundred kilograms of copper-bearing rock per gram, then this enterprise is really worth attention.
  85. 0
    4 March 2016 20: 27
    That’s why, for some reason, among us and some demagogic authors, Saudi Arabia, with its population of 30 million, is perceived as a country of armless idlers, but it doesn’t matter that it is the first supplier of polypropylene to the EU and in general is ahead of Russia in petrochemicals (even if using borrowed technologies), the authors need before hang labels on countries and peoples first, as people who want to show themselves educated study the issue at least on the World Wide Web.
  86. 0
    17 March 2016 13: 49
    What do the Saudis sell besides oil? probably tourist services, and at the same time 32 million Saudis live very well. Russia sells a lot of other things besides oil and gas. It’s not very good to live, but at least 144 million Russians could live well. This is not happening because a clique of country leaders and oligarchs do not want to share their windfall profits

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"