Retouchers at war

31


Now this craft is called processing in Photoshop, and after the war, many photographers hunted by taking precious photos from widows and retouching them at their discretion.

In Russia, this art has come from America. Known for the most durable fake, which "personifies" 16-th American president. In fact, only the head of Abraham Lincoln is present in the photograph. Everything else - the torso, the setting, the globe, the flag - was inherited from US Vice President John Calhona. Who was engaged in this retouching is not known today. Also American craftsmen-retouchers worked actively on the heroes of their Civil War.

It is known that in Russia one of the first to use the method of photo retouching was Sergey Levitsky. He became a court photographer, and with great pleasure he photographed not only the imperial family of Alexander II, but also many famous people of that time. It was Sergey Levitsky who owned several iconic discoveries made by him in photographic work: in particular, he first began to use a combination of solar and electric light in the process of shooting, and was able to develop a retouching technique for the resulting images. But Sergei Levitsky used retouching extremely rarely, primarily for technical purposes. First, he was one of the first in Europe who made a decorative background using retouching. Secondly, he used retouching as a correction of technical blots made during the work. He was a high-class photographer. But many other authors did not possess such talent and began to actively apply the retouching method to correct their blunders. Retouching became so widespread that Levitsky was forced to write a special letter in his professional journal in which he condemned the excessive use of retouching.

But this call was not heard. Retouching remained to live for centuries, acquiring today completely different forms and frames. But the main principle - frame correction - remained unchanged.

So the unique profession - retoucher began to appear slowly. She was imperceptible and irreplaceable. Especially in the 30-ies, when the former comrades in the political struggle, dispersed in their views, one by one disappeared from the political horizon. And in the same way they disappeared by the brush of the retoucher, whose work became akin to the work of the artist.

In the 30 of the last century, Mikhail Gershman became a virtuoso of not only retouching, but also the creation of photographic portraits, the distinctive feature of which was the hours-long construction of the desired image, the desired frame. His work sometimes lasted for hours. For this, he received thanks from Voroshilov. Many 30 military leaders sought to take pictures with Gershman, then send their official photos to all-Union newspapers.

The new trend in art took advantage of many political leaders who were not satisfied for several reasons, their own appearance, as well as the presence or absence of the right people.

Benito Mussolini terribly did not like the picture, where he bravely sat on his horse, which was held by the bridles of one of his many fascist minions. Benito was supposed to be the one personifying his heroic pathos. Of course, the retouchers removed the horse, and in its place drew a landscape.

They tried to retouch Churchill's photograph several times - they cleaned the famous cigar.

But is it worth blaming retouchers in an effort to embellish reality? After all, they worked on the instructions of their superiors and fulfilled their received orders on excellent occasions. Although there were punctures. Most offended by their corrected photos, the authors of the pictures - professional photographers. Years later, when the dangerous time, in their opinion, passed, they tried to tell what changes had befallen their priceless shots. One of the most famous photographs concerning the coverage of the Victory during the Great Patriotic War — the flag over the Reichstag — was also retouched. But did this make it worse? Hardly. Judge for yourself. If in the initial version the red flag was not particularly well looked through against the general background, then in the retouched it became more red, attracting attention.



Yes, thunderclouds were also drawn, but they only emphasized the peculiarity and tragedy of the developing events.

Also, the vigilant editors examined the clock on Abdulhakim Ismailov’s hand and decided to remove it with a needle.

Only three technical interventions. This picture went around the whole world and, of course, fell into the hands of American ideologues, who set the task for their photographers to get the same picture.



The Americans tried to make a similar picture - “Hoisting the flag over Iwo Jima”. But it is unlikely that they were able to convey all the depth, all the tragedy, all the joy that is clearly manifested in Soviet photography. There, excuse me, the US military has turned the "rear" part. One of the American mothers identified her son's butt and even filed a lawsuit, arguing that "she had studied her son's ass well from the cradle too."

During the years of the Great Patriotic War, some front-line photographers specifically instructed retouchers on how to properly handle the image. Thus, the instruction in one sentence, written by the famous front-line photographer Mikhail Savin, who was able to catch a cat's ear in the frame and wrote so that the photo in this place is not retouched, is widely known.
Retouchers at war

The retouchers' affairs in 1985 were well known, when Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev was "smeared" with a birthmark on his head.

In 2011, an unknown buyer paid Christie's $ 4 338 500 for the retouched photograph of the deserted bank of the Rhine (photo by Andreas Gursky). Of course, one of the most expensive photographers in the world, the German Gursky is a worthy successor to the business of retouchers. After graduating from the Dusseldorf Academy of Arts, he does not hide that he uses Photoshop when creating his three or four-meter photographs and paintings. This does not stop his fans. Ukrainian businessman Viktor Pinchuk posted in 2007 for one photo $ 3 340 456.

And here I want to stop. I remembered the terrible in its simplicity and tragedy history an ordinary village woman who retouched a photograph of her only beloved one who did not return from the front.

The herd of variegated rock swayed, the cows rushed together to the water, swaying with a heavy udder, pushing their sides in a narrow, like a trench, coastal descent. So, one after another, they entered the river. And then for a long time, almost a whole hour, they stood motionless, plunged by their necks into a warm river, which saved them from the heat and gadflies, half closed their sad eyes with their eyelids full of bites for centuries. Dear to the village, the cows had time to dry out, they came home dry and clean. They gave the milk to the housewives, waited the coolest heat in the cold stalls, and again Baba Klasha blew the horn, gathered her flock and again drove him to the river, now through the wooden bridge to the other bank. Here, on the river side, there was real grazing. True, it is far from the village, about five kilometers away, but the herbs here were untouched, thickly embroidered with flowers, this is where the rogula delicacy is! The cows grazed in the motley grass, and the woman Klacha sat under the willow bush, near the very river water, and thought her thoughts.

How much she lived in the world, how much she looked at the world around her, so much could not admire the sky and the night stars, early and evening summer lightning, the sun and grass, wheat fields, fields in the blue flowering of flax, in yellow sunflowers. To look and not to look at all this goodness, to live would be to rejoice in this so wisely created world.

“And people for some reason,” she thought, “start wars, kill one alone, even prepare such a wild weaponto shoot the Earth from space. " Listening on TV about wars, Baba Klasha shuddered with fear, or even squeezed her eyes tight, sitting at the TV, so as not to see young boys, women and children dying from bullets and bombs.

And she could not understand only one thing: what kind of people are they who want to fight, who don’t feel sorry for anything and anyone on Earth? Or did they not give birth to mothers? Or do they have neither wives, nor children, nor grandchildren? And if there is, then, it turns out, they are ready to condemn their bloodline to death? Then what kind of people are they!

So Baba Klasha was thinking in the shadow under a palm bush, recalling yesterday’s program on TV, when a gray-haired man with glasses told from the screen how many nuclear weapons were already stored on Earth.

And suddenly, as something heavy is thumping behind her back in the middle of a bush, how the branches of God's fears will crack! Baba Klasha was so frightened that the grandson, Slavik, who had climbed out of the bushes of Dunin, seemed to her at that moment not Slavik, but God knows who.

“Grandma Dunya sent me for you,” Slavik said. - I am going to shoot the cows, and you go to the village. There the photographer arrived, brought portraits.

- Had arrived?! - Baba Klasha lit up her face.

And she began to speak, hastily dressing a white handkerchief on her head, as if preening herself:

- So I will run. I'll run, and you look, Slavichek, do not lose cows. Here's a whip. Do not be afraid.

Catching up with one hand the hem of a long skirt, she safely straddled the bike and quickly twisted her pedals.

Baba Klasha was incredibly glad that the portrait of Grisha was brought so quickly. About three weeks ago, a white boy from a district center declared himself at their little farm. Bees on a red “Zaporozhets”.

I traveled around the village, went to the huts, offered to order large portraits from small cards, wrote out receipts, but did not take money in advance.

On their Forest Lane, all ordered portraits: who is his own, who is his son or daughter, and he and Dunya are portraits of their husbands, Gregory, who died in the war, and Fyodor, who died a year ago.

And earlier, when she was a widow at a young age, and now, in her declining years, Klavdia Danilovna Nazarchuk believed that her friend Duna Starodub had a lot more than her luck in life. Though Fedor lost both legs in the war, he was still a support and help for Dunya. True, not a simple story happened to Dunya and Fedor, but had this happened to her Gregory, and she would have rushed after him to the ends of the earth. And the story was like that.

The war was already over, it was forty-sixth year. She and Dunya have long received funerals for their husbands. Suddenly, Duna receives a letter from an unfamiliar woman. And the woman writes to her that she works as a weigher at the Razdolnaya station, where she happened to meet Dunin’s husband, Fedor Starodub, by chance. He writes that he is alive, only completely legless. What goes on trains in a pea jacket and peakless cap, sings plaintive songs, and people throw money into the capless cap, and he drinks them up, spends their nights wherever they go.

Once I asked a drunk man to sleep in her bed for the night, she let out so that she would not die in the cold, then asked who she was and where, remember the address and surname.

Dunya with crying came running to Klasch. Ten times they read that letter, cried together, decided what to do. Doubts that this is not Fedor, was not: he is Starodub, he is from Bees, he fought in the marines.

The next day, just in the cold fresco, Dunya left the village. And she returned in the spring, along with Fedor.

After Fedor was found, Klasha did not leave hope for a long time: what if her Grisha was alive? Maybe he, like Fedor, was mistakenly considered killed in battle? Maybe she will receive a letter like Duna? She had been waiting for such a letter for years. But it was not.

The forest lane was marginal and short (only eight houses on one side, and on the other pine forest), looked from end to end. And as soon as the woman Klash drove into her Forest and did not see a red Zaporozhets on it, she became alarmed: was she really late?

She flew to her hut with a lock on the door, leaned a bicycle against a brick wall, and immediately saw Manyu Prokhorenko, a former milkmaid who had left her yard, and now a “young retiree”.

“How long has he been a photographer?” - asked the woman Klasha.

- Yes, half an hour has not passed, - answered Manya. And, having guessed why the woman Klasha was alarmed, she began to justify herself: - I forgot that you are grazing today. If you said so. Or maybe Dunya took? - Baba Klasha suggested, and, having left Mania, hurried into a neighboring courtyard.

But she did not find any photos of her girlfriend. Terribly sick heart of an elderly woman. She sat for a long time with her girlfriend, listened to her consolation, but with each passing hour she felt worse and worse. The only card that remained from her dear, beloved husband who died in the war, she foolishly gave the white-haired photographer, broke up with the only memory of her husband, and now sits and does not know what to do.

It was decided to go to the district center and try to find a photographer there. And, maybe, he will turn in their edges? But the days went by, but the photographer was not there. In the district center, where Baba Klasha went, she wandered through the streets and could not find the photographer, nobody knew him there.

Already after this news, she fell into bed for a long time and did not rise until the first frost. And when I went out into the street, everyone suddenly saw how much old Klaš had grown old. She lived in the hope that her beloved, beloved one would still return, and this hope supported her on the most difficult days, did not allow her to let go of power. After all, many widows who have lost their husbands have not been able to raise their darlings from the pool of anguish of suffering.

But I had to live somehow further. And she lived. Often went to the gate, sat up late with the hope of seeing "Zaporozhets" photographer. But he did not come.

So a few years have passed. Older Baba Klasha still sat near her leaning little house and waited. She had not long to wait on this earth.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    2 March 2016 06: 46
    I looked at the photo of the red banner above the Reichstag and asked the question why Ismailov has a watch on both hands, one military man told me that one of them could be a compass.
    1. Riv
      +2
      2 March 2016 12: 09
      So what? It’s like in a war, breaking a watch is not a problem. It could well put on two pieces. Now, if he had three pieces on each hand ... :)
      1. -1
        5 March 2016 13: 16
        my father heard the story of the watch from a direct participant, the TASS photo editor, back in the 70s.
        there were several hours, three or something :-)))
  2. +6
    2 March 2016 06: 59
    That's how Gorbachev stopped retouching, and a joke appeared immediately: what will happen if you hit a birthmark with a brick? The answer is the sea of ​​vodka and the end of perestroika!
  3. +2
    2 March 2016 07: 38
    Thank you, Polina .. wonderful article, read with interest ..
  4. +10
    2 March 2016 07: 38
    A cat with a shot ear, this is certainly a masterpiece, have not seen her before.
    And I wonder if one of the most famous photographs of the Second World War "Kombat" was retouched or not?
  5. +1
    2 March 2016 07: 51
    We must pay tribute to the retouchers. Retouching "silver" (in the sense of real) photographs is much more difficult than modern digital ones.
  6. +1
    2 March 2016 08: 03
    But they were unlikely to be able to convey all the depth, all the tragedy, all the joy that is evident in Soviet photography

    In our photo, the natural result of the tragedy to which the whole country was going, regardless of anything. It contains blood, the filth of war, the tears of mothers and widows and the lives of millions of our citizens who did not live up to this moment. And joy, when someone first heard on the radio "the act of unconditional surrender was signed ..." and the people poured out onto the streets, not yet fully realizing that here it is - Victory!
  7. +1
    2 March 2016 08: 52
    taste and color, as you know ...
    And then I want to stop.

    talking about retouching, one can not help but say about the tragedy of Balthermanz, and about the famous cloud of tigers and much more.
    but you didn’t say anything about it.
  8. +4
    2 March 2016 09: 21
    A strange article, of course. In fact, little has been said about image editing / retouching, no systematization, vivid examples / images - the cat cried. It seems that the first part was only somehow "fastened" to the story, for a seed. As the story seems more interesting, there is almost "nothing" about editing / retouching in the background.
    Can already immediately open a separate section - such as artistic readings?
    1. +1
      2 March 2016 15: 24
      Quote: sevtrash
      Can already immediately open a separate section - such as artistic readings?

      A person just needs to decide to start writing about people without attempting historical analysis.
      and all
  9. +2
    2 March 2016 10: 08
    Great article, and the ending really touched. Thanks, Polina.
  10. -2
    2 March 2016 11: 51
    Here is the famous shot: Lenin and Krupskaya among the peasants
    in the village of Kashino.
    Then the children were left and the adults (dispossessed and deported)
    - removed.
    1. +2
      2 March 2016 16: 47
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Here is the famous shot: Lenin and Krupskaya among the peasants
      in the village of Kashino.
      Then the children were left and the adults (dispossessed and deported)
      - removed.

      smash nonsense
      just Lenin was poorly visible in the group photo
      and the enlarged piece of the photograph spread more widely
  11. +2
    2 March 2016 11: 57
    More Lenin: 1920.
    On the steps of the rostrum Trotsky, behind Kamenev.

    In the photo in 1927 they are no longer ... smile
    1. The comment was deleted.
  12. +5
    2 March 2016 12: 24
    There was Yezhov - and there is no Yezhov!
    1. 0
      5 March 2016 13: 18
      just like in 1984 :-)
  13. +6
    2 March 2016 12: 41
    In my opinion, one of the best military photographs. No retouching.
    1. 0
      2 March 2016 12: 47
      Sumptuously! Breathtaking.
    2. -10
      2 March 2016 15: 18
      The photo of the tank is impressive and real, military.

      But this is impressive, but staged,
      from exercises:
      1. +3
        2 March 2016 16: 53
        Quote: voyaka uh
        The photo of the tank is impressive and real, military.

        But this is impressive, but staged,
        from exercises:

        it looks like schizophrenia will visit you soon in your Russophobia
        you go the right way
      2. 0
        2 March 2016 18: 07
        And even so, it’s still an expressive photo. Propaganda was on both sides of the front. But ours was more intelligible.
      3. 0
        2 March 2016 18: 07
        And even so, it’s still an expressive photo. Propaganda was on both sides of the front. But ours was more intelligible.
      4. 0
        3 March 2016 13: 02
        Well, just hard to look at the wiki?
        “Kombat” is a famous photograph of the Great Patriotic War taken by the Soviet photographer Max Alpert. The photo shows a commander raising a soldier in the attack with a TT pistol in his hand, a few seconds before his death.
    3. -2
      2 March 2016 15: 22
      Quote: sergo1914
      In my opinion, one of the best military photographs. No retouching.

      without retouching. yeah the dead man moves and the sleeves move
      1. +1
        2 March 2016 17: 01
        Quote: Stas57
        Quote: sergo1914
        In my opinion, one of the best military photographs. No retouching.

        without retouching. yeah the dead man moves and the sleeves move

        I don’t agree about the deceased, I don’t see a change in body position

        I agree with the shells - they have been moved, I can even explain why:
        the second photo, where our tank is shown larger - brighter and better, but the cartridges in this version remain behind the scenes, obviously the photographer changed the position of the cartridges and made the feat of the tankers closer for us
        Is this something criminal? in my opinion there is absolutely no, maybe it doesn’t cancel the feat of the tankman himself, moreover, the photographer is great, I think even a dead tanker would agree with such a decision

        this situation is the same as with the story about "28 Panfilov's men" - when liberals foaming at the mouth try to cancel the FEAT of soldiers on the basis of small details
        1. 0
          2 March 2016 18: 15
          Is this something criminal? in my opinion there is absolutely no, maybe it doesn’t cancel the feat of the tankman himself, moreover, the photographer is great, I think even a dead tanker would agree with such a decision

          there is one but-this feat must be recorded as a feat and described in the newspaper, it’s still not some kind of amateur photographer who clicked, but a person who was a correspondent of the TASS Newsreel and Sovinformburo, and that he, -
          - "Well guys, they snapped a beautiful shot and went home
          "?
          and what did not fix the name of the hero who shot the column?
          I do not believe in that.
          then what is this combat episode? and what kind of shooting? why we don’t know about him, why the military commissar TASS M Alpert hid him from us, didn’t name either the name or the regiment.


          Quote: Andrey Skokovsky
          I don’t agree about the deceased, I don’t see a change in body position

          head, hand, look carefully.

          5 years ago argued on this photo
          http://waralbum.ru/6492/
          http://waralbum.ru/40656/

          Well, how to explain the doubts, well, you are military commander, on the battlefield you see 20 Germans killed with a knife, a Russian soldier with a dagger in his hand, photograph all this and calmly go about your business? I do not believe...
          at least - "guys, I took off such a report - a Russian soldier of 20 Germans with a knife, he died, hero!"
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. -1
      2 March 2016 16: 23
      And the tank is not something that is not exactly T-34, but not T-34 at all. Kv it.
  14. -1
    2 March 2016 15: 28
    1943
    July 15
    Cameraman Kazakov, who was the first to meet me, saw a familiar face with a "watering can" and decided to give me a pleasant surprise. He took me aside (for privacy) and confidentially said:
    - The Tiger was brought to the village of N-sky. You can shoot as you like and do whatever you want with it. Do not miss!
    This is especially funny when you consider that for all the days of the fighting, not a single Tiger was shot, although many dozens were shot down. And the editors demanded. But all the tanks were either on enemy territory or on nobody’s land. And about three days ago, one team evacuated the Tiger. The tiger reporters immediately attacked him. They snapped it from all sides, smoked everything around with sabers and fuses. But all outdid Knorin from the Red Star. He filmed, like everyone else, and flew to Moscow. The next day (July 13) in the newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda, a panorama of four Tigers appeared on the front page, and on the second a combat episode with the Tiger. And it was all the same unfortunate tortured one single standard tank.
    Brontman L.K. Diaries 1932 – 1947.


    http://hranitel-slov.livejournal.com/78020.html
    1. +4
      2 March 2016 15: 42
      He-he-he ... the most interesting thing is that in the caption under the photo there is no talk of any "tigers" - they are simply impersonal. "german tanks".

      The editor of "KZ" insured himself absolutely correctly - because in reality in the photo there are not "tigers" and not even "tigers type 4" attributed to them, but "three": Pz III Ausf N from the 18th Panzer Division (c) panzeralex.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. +2
    2 March 2016 21: 37
    Quote: voyaka uh
    But this is impressive, but staged,
    from exercises:

    You are apparently a very offended person, notice not an evil one, but an offended one. Although you want to seem evil. Well, offended ... well, you know.
    These are not exercises, but a real battle. A young officer under the Nazi bullets raises a soldier in the attack. The story of the creation of this legendary photo is in the public domain. Why are you lying? Do not dare to dirty our history with your dirty speculation. You on the promised land do not understand the whole tragedy and heroism of the Russian people in the Great Patriotic War.
    Here's how it was according to the author of this photo:
    The Nazis frantically rushed to attack after attack. There were many killed and wounded. Our very thinning regiment was already fighting off the tenth or eleventh attack. The Nazis climbed straight ahead to Voroshilovgrad, to which there were about thirty kilometers. By the end of the day, the company commander, Senior Lieutenant Petrenko, was wounded. After fierce bombing, with the support of tanks and artillery, the Nazis launched another attack. And then, rising to his full height, with the words: “Follow me! For the motherland! Go! ”, Eremenko carried the company along to meet the chains of the Nazis. The attack was repelled, but the political instructor died.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"