Military Review

UVZ: 20 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles on the Armata platform are currently being tested

110
Twenty combat vehicles on the Armat platform are being tested, reports RIA News a message from Vyacheslav Khalitov, deputy general director of Uralvagonzavod.


UVZ: 20 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles on the Armata platform are currently being tested


«Tanks T-14 and heavy T-15 infantry fighting vehicles are being tested, ”he said on the air of the Russian Service radio News».

Khalitov noted that “the Armata advanced combat tracked platform created in Russia, which implements the four-level protection system, has no analogues in the world and will allow ahead of the leading tank-building countries, such as the United States, Israel, Germany and France.”

“The Armata platform exceeds analogs by 25%, including in terms of security. This is a tank of a different generation ... We made such a qualitative leap forward ... ahead of them, probably, years on 8-10. Therefore, the creation of an example of the type “Almaty” is a repetition, and during this time we will go much further, ”he said.

According to the deputy head of the UVZ, “the systems of the first level of protection make it difficult for the enemy to detect an armored vehicle on the battlefield in the radar, infrared and optical ranges”.

“We use GALS-technologies related to the protection of the machine with a special coating, creating a reflective surface,” he explained.

“The second level of protection allows you to destroy projectiles and anti-tank missiles flying up to tanks. The third level is the dynamic protection system, which destroys the ammunition that has overcome two levels. The fourth level system ensures the survivability of the combat vehicle and crew, ”said Halitov.

He also said that the test vehicles will go into service with the army in 2016-2017.
Photos used:
www.sciencedebate2008.com
110 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Irokez
    Irokez 28 February 2016 12: 08 New
    -16 qualifying.
    It's good. But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.
    1. cniza
      cniza 28 February 2016 12: 13 New
      18
      He also said that the test vehicles will go into service with the army in 2016-2017.


      For staff training is no longer bad.
      1. Giant thought
        Giant thought 28 February 2016 12: 32 New
        +8
        It is a pity that there is no information about the initial test evaluations, but we all hope for a quick and positive result.
        1. Alexey-74
          Alexey-74 29 February 2016 10: 36 New
          0
          I think official test scores will appear just before entering the army ....
      2. Dryuya2
        Dryuya2 28 February 2016 12: 33 New
        10
        he said on the radio Russian News Service

        I listened - I liked it.
        ======
        Igor Korotchenko in the General Staff program on the Russian News Service on February 27, 2016. Armata tanks in service with the Russian army. Production and repair of armored vehicles today.
      3. Voha_krim
        Voha_krim 28 February 2016 12: 36 New
        +5
        “We use GALS technologies related to the protection of the machine with a special coating, creating a reflective surface”
        Polite tank - imperceptibly so creeps up and does not hurt ...
        1. vyinemeynen
          vyinemeynen 28 February 2016 12: 47 New
          -9
          Quote: Voha_krim
          reflective surface

          mirror tank is cool!
          Halitov raves, people rejoice! You might think that the main function of a tank of bunnies from the bushes is to let them go!
          Judging by the photos from the parade, the surface is not reflective (matte), should absorb laser and radio waves.
          1. Homo
            Homo 28 February 2016 15: 20 New
            +2
            Quote: vyinemeynen
            mirror tank is cool!

            You directly sparkled with knowledge.
            "First of all, we use GALS technologies associated with the protection of the machine with a special coating, creating a reflective surface so that in different ranges it was impossible to determine what kind of object it is: both in the radar, infrared and optical ranges", - said Vyacheslav Khalitov."

            "Reflective materials are used to make reflectors and redistribute the luminous flux of light sources by reflecting it in the right directions. By the nature of the distribution of reflected light, specular (directional), directionally scattered, scattered (diffuse) and mixed reflection. "

            http://msd.com.ua/svetotexnika/svetootrazhayushhie-materialy/
            1. vyinemeynen
              vyinemeynen 28 February 2016 16: 25 New
              -6
              Physics at the level of kindergarten I see is not yours! repeat and the imagination for a tank sparkling in the sun (the most complete spectrum) is not enough? Or will this camouflage sparkle be laughing
              they answered me on another site,
              CALS-technologies (Eng. Continuous Acquisition and Lifecycle Support - continuous information support for supply and product life cycle), or IPI (information support for product life cycle processes) - an approach to the design and manufacture of high-tech and high-tech products, consisting in the use of computer equipment and information technologies at all stages of the product life cycle.
              Khalitov simply correspondent trollit say in the case is not particularly what, secretly. That's fun.
              1. Rostovchanin
                Rostovchanin 1 March 2016 14: 37 New
                0
                unlucky for your carelessness
                speech in the article about GALS technologies
                You mean "CALS-technologies (English Continuous Acquisition and Lifecycle Support .."
                see the difference, or so from your idiotic comment in the wilds start?
              2. The comment was deleted.
      4. Tor5
        Tor5 28 February 2016 12: 36 New
        +1
        This is great!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. elmi
      elmi 28 February 2016 12: 15 New
      10
      Yes, the best test is a combat test. But if you check it in the conditions of the strictest secrecy and security, so that in case of what the armata does not get to outsiders, and if the West finds out that the armata is tested in Syria, then they will get out of their skin just to get a sample.
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 28 February 2016 12: 34 New
        25
        Quote: Irokez
        But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.

        Quote: elmi
        Yes, the best test is a combat test.

        Brothers, well, you would have to send everything to Syria, first you have to run in your training grounds and prepare the crews, eliminate the deficiencies and start up the series, but in Syria now the T-72 and 90 are not doing badly. hi
        1. elmi
          elmi 28 February 2016 19: 53 New
          +1
          Quote: vovanpain
          Brothers, well, you would have to send everything to Syria, first you have to run in your training grounds and prepare the crews, eliminate the deficiencies and start up the series, but in Syria now the T-72 and 90 are not doing badly.

          I had in mind in Syria to run in after all the checks and decisions of mass production. The fact that the tank was used in combat conditions gives a huge plus, both for prestige - that it has proved its effectiveness in combat conditions and advertising (although I think no one doubts that the armata is the best tank in the world) I think that the tank should not be sold in the near future, for me not to sell like that at all, let other countries catch up with us. Having sold, we will reduce the time for them to create such tanks, or at least close ones (for example, China copies everything when it hits)
    4. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 28 February 2016 12: 19 New
      17
      Quote: Irokez
      It's good. But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.

      The machine is damp anyway, it can still be bombarded and finished up intensively for two years and then upgraded according to the results, and in real combat conditions this is a risk of losing the crew due to unverified systems, a copy in favor of partners, and reputation damage is great.
      Look at the practice of applying the latest HF in the first months of the war, almost all of them just broke due to the lack of zip. The cars were completely new.
      1. Irokez
        Irokez 28 February 2016 14: 35 New
        -2
        Really it’s impossible to send three tanks to guard the airbase. Everything is at hand, if something is close to the front line and a little break in the trunk.
        Climate - times.
        Communication and on-site system verification are two.
        The psychological effect for all parties is three.

        After all, what kind of advertising immediately around the world and the inspiration to the Syrians that the latest tank in Russia is already at their side. After all, the SU-35 is already being used like the SU-34, which is also considered a new one.
        Caliber experienced - yes.
        Long-range aviation experienced the use of winged ones - yes.
        We also experienced underwater launches from the Caspian - yes.
        And what effect did it have? That's right huge. Even to bring it cleanly and ride through several villages and take a picture against the background of it is already an internal effect of consciousness and intelligence that ignites the desire to destroy terrorism on our land. Well, imagine "Bear-Armatka" (already without a muzzle) fighting side by side with a Syrian against a bunch of "Wolves-Jackals" and knowing the covered rear by a bear and his support is not afraid to mow the harvest of wolf skins.
        The MIG-35 would also not hurt, albeit in its raw form, to show in Syria because they have exactly the MIGs as fighters and they are closer to Sushki, and at the same time hint that this is their future plane to protect the country.
        After all, capitalists do not spare money on advertising and window dressing and this gives its effect even if everyone understands that it is only window dressing.
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 28 February 2016 14: 47 New
          15
          Quote: Irokez
          Really it’s impossible to send three tanks to guard the air base

          Have you decided to play tank games? Well, let's do something ..

          Quote: Irokez
          Everything is at hand

          Yeah .. and spare parts for "tanks" (according to rumors, there were gun barrel breaks, for example .. what will we change for)?

          Quote: Irokez
          run around the trunk a little

          In-in .. and I about that .. only "to run in the trunk" is better .. closer to the plant, nevertheless, no?

          Quote: Irokez
          On-site communications and system verification

          Why is the landfill bad?
          .......

          In short:

          - the car is damp. Anything can (and should) break. You can drive the car on the training ground ... just as you like. "To break."
          - when "guarding the airfield" - one must sit quietly, like a mouse, and drive with a sting. Do you feel the difference?
          - if "something is broken" - a repair base is needed nearby. And it is for Armata. Is there such in Syria? Yes, no, I don’t know?
          - Armata is a fundamentally new car. Do you think the "partners" will want to try to get at least one? Don't go to a fortune-teller - they will. There, these Armats will have to be guarded ... more than the airbase ...

          And with a dozen more considerations.

          The cat Manul finished the "game" .. did you like it? wink
        2. arnulla
          arnulla 28 February 2016 15: 02 New
          +7
          Who should be sent to guard? The tank is not accepted for service? Not even tested? Do you even think about what you are writing? !!
    5. DMB_95
      DMB_95 28 February 2016 12: 37 New
      +8
      The idea is tempting, but it is hardly worth sending Armata to Syria. Each car will have to be protected as the president of Syria.
    6. Maxom75
      Maxom75 28 February 2016 12: 38 New
      +2
      In no case, until we saturate the army within the country of any supplies abroad. I generally think no sooner than 15 years from any export deliveries. Only after the appearance of the next generation can we think about export, but for now supply the modernized T-72 and T-90.
    7. shurik
      shurik 28 February 2016 12: 39 New
      0
      Who to fight with ????
    8. forest park 86
      forest park 86 28 February 2016 13: 02 New
      0
      pass in Kubinka.
    9. GSH-18
      GSH-18 28 February 2016 13: 32 New
      -4
      Quote: Irokez
      It's good. But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.

      Early.
      Moreover, according to our own statements, only aviation operates at our invitation there. Therefore, in the conditions of the strictest secrecy, it would be possible to test in combat conditions the T-50 (PAK FA). That would be powerful! good
      1. Irokez
        Irokez 28 February 2016 14: 49 New
        0
        Quote: GSH-18
        Moreover, according to our own statements, only aviation operates at our invitation there.

        And the T-90, too, by invitation, and "Calibers", "Grads" and other sweets for the bearded were discussed right away?
    10. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 28 February 2016 14: 31 New
      +1
      Quote: Irokez
      But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.

      And the security division ...
      1. Irokez
        Irokez 28 February 2016 14: 53 New
        0
        Quote: Semen Semenych
        Quote: Irokez
        But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.

        And the security division ...

        In Yemen, Abrams was taken prisoner and undermined as unnecessary, and why, why, because there is nothing to do with him either to drag away or to use, and even ours did not bother to get him, because it is simply impossible to take out safely and soundly from the battlefield. And you are talking about Syria and the protection for tanks, because if it is on the field, then it will be burned right away with all imaginable and inconceivable means, or it will simply be beaten back.
        Do not exaggerate Semen Semyonitch, turn on the logic.
        1. Semen Semyonitch
          Semen Semyonitch 28 February 2016 23: 11 New
          0
          Who is interested in "Abrasha"? Yes, by and large, nobody. And behind the "Armata" line would be lined up to China. hi
    11. per3526
      per3526 28 February 2016 18: 09 New
      0
      can immediately drawings to washington
      1. Irokez
        Irokez 28 February 2016 21: 49 New
        0
        Quote: per3526
        can immediately drawings to washington

        It is mandatory to Washington, but only adjusted, so that according to these drawings a steam locomotive is obtained. )))
        1. Cananecat
          Cananecat 29 February 2016 05: 38 New
          +1
          And the file ... do not forget to put the file in the drawings laughing
    12. vell.65
      vell.65 28 February 2016 21: 23 New
      0
      Quote: Irokez
      It's good. But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.

      Let the full tests take place at home first, after all, combat testing is someone else's life again or are you ready to sit at the helm of this car? hi
      1. Irokez
        Irokez 28 February 2016 21: 54 New
        0
        Quote: vell.65
        Are you ready to sit at the helm of this car?

        You know, and you are right. I can’t sit down, and the officers will control Armata or very excellent contract soldiers, and therefore it is not yet possible to teach the Syrian, and if the tanks are there, then our crew is there.
        Here you are right.
    13. ava09
      ava09 28 February 2016 22: 37 New
      +1
      Quote: Irokez
      It's good. But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.

      What for?! You can shoot at various goals and check the defense without possible problems in Syria. But tank battles and confrontations with NATO helicopters, there is still not expected.
    14. Olfred
      Olfred 1 March 2016 22: 43 New
      0
      which (at least) have not yet been tested? were you sane by writing this ??? hi
  2. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock 28 February 2016 12: 09 New
    19
    Until 2020, they promised to produce 2300 Armat tanks. 4 years left before the planned date. I doubt that they will have time. 575 tanks a year is fantastic for us ...
    1. Coconut Tima
      Coconut Tima 28 February 2016 12: 14 New
      +7
      According to Sienko, general director of the Uralvagonzavod research and production corporation, the state arms program provides for the delivery of the army of 2300 Armata units by 2020, however, most likely, it will be adjusted by the deadline: “Volumes will probably remain, but the period will move by 2025. "
      1. Rader
        Rader 28 February 2016 12: 20 New
        +5
        There is one more question. They talk about Armata, meaning only the T-14? Or all the equipment based on this platform? If the second, then not enough, to put it mildly ...
        1. Coconut Tima
          Coconut Tima 28 February 2016 12: 32 New
          +2
          A new generation of armored vehicles based on the Armata platform is undergoing an intensive test cycle. In parallel with the development of the installation of the 152 mm guns on the Armata platform, factory tests of three vehicles of this platform’s line are in full swing: the T-14 tank with 125 mm gun, the heavy T-15 Barberry BMP with various combat modules and the armored recovery and evacuation vehicle ARV machines.
          1. Rader
            Rader 28 February 2016 13: 06 New
            +2
            That's right, 3 cars pass the test: tank, heavy infantry fighting vehicle, BREMka. But I asked about purchases. If you buy T-14 2 pieces - that's good! Very well! Especially when you consider that this is only the first batch and excluding other machines on this platform (and they will be purchased the same, no doubt). If they buy 300k T-1, 14k T-1 and 15 hundreds of ARVs, then this, well ... not to say that it’s bad ... especially when compared with the 3s, but they expected more!
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 28 February 2016 13: 54 New
              0
              It will be purchased exactly 2300 Armata platforms - and this is all together both BMP and Tank and ARVs.
          2. TURAR
            TURAR 2 March 2016 11: 17 New
            0
            Our western "partners" choked on "barbaric")) The names are simply gorgeous.
    2. GSH-18
      GSH-18 28 February 2016 13: 38 New
      -1
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      I doubt that they will have time. 575 tanks a year is fantastic for us ...

      Sergei Pavlovich Korolev very accurately put it in his time about "fantasy": "I prefer fantasy in drawings!" After all, MBT "Armata" itself is a fantasy today.
      The fulfillment of the state defense order for SUCH deliveries is very closely monitored by representatives of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation at manufacturing enterprises. So I have no doubt that the corresponding industrial facilities were prepared in advance according to the delivery plan yes
    3. tulpar
      tulpar 28 February 2016 14: 18 New
      0
      can the numbers of tanks released are classified
  3. ydjin
    ydjin 28 February 2016 12: 10 New
    +1
    Let the enemies think!
  4. Sergey Medvedev
    Sergey Medvedev 28 February 2016 12: 13 New
    +2
    Rather, Armata would be in the army and would rather be mass production.
  5. serg1970
    serg1970 28 February 2016 12: 17 New
    +1
    T-14. And when in 2034 they will create a new tank, will it be T-34 again? It would be necessary to somehow include a century in the name, not? :)

    PS: Although who knows what the Uralvagonzavod will produce in the 22nd century? Maybe ZS-14 (Death Star)? :)
    1. DMB_95
      DMB_95 28 February 2016 12: 43 New
      +5
      The T-34 sounds great anytime. The main thing is to create a war machine worthy of such a name.
  6. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 28 February 2016 12: 17 New
    +1
    Actually the tank of the future, so many degrees of protection and the crew in the cradle. It's time to retire 72.
    1. Rader
      Rader 28 February 2016 12: 28 New
      +4
      Quote: Spartanez300
      Actually the tank of the future, so many degrees of protection and the crew in the cradle. It's time to retire 72.

      First, stamp the T-14 in the required volumes (to create a mobile reserve, and even 2 thousand will not be enough), and then the 72th and at rest, or maybe not wink (Nobody has yet canceled helping brotherly nations! yes )
      1. Deniska
        Deniska 28 February 2016 18: 43 New
        0
        First, stamp the T-14 in the required volumes (to create a mobile reserve, and even 2 thousand will not be enough), and then the 72th to retire, or maybe not wink (Nobody has canceled helping brotherly nations! Yes)


        It seems like it was planned to replace 72 by 90. At least conscripts will definitely not be put on "Armata" in the coming years.
    2. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 28 February 2016 12: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: Spartanez300
      Actually the tank of the future, so many degrees of protection and the crew in the cradle. It's time to retire 72.

      Armata is very expensive, and for many buyers it is redundant, a T90 tank should remain as a mass mobilization machine and for export to poor buyers.
    3. Ezhaak
      Ezhaak 28 February 2016 14: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: Spartanez300
      It's time 72 to rest.

      "Rest", how's that? In Russia, both the T-55 and T-64 stand quietly in the units and wait in the wings. They only dream of peace! One of the Russian storage bases.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 28 February 2016 16: 41 New
        -1
        Waiting in the wings - sending for cutting and re-melting.
        1. Ezhaak
          Ezhaak 28 February 2016 18: 45 New
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          Waiting in the wings - sending for cutting and re-melting.

          They are not very actively debited from their accounts. Quickly only fairy tales affect.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 28 February 2016 12: 19 New
    +2
    IMHO, it is necessary to reduce the crew of the tank to two people. In principle, Armata allows it. The security of the crew is great in it. Alas, the real advantages of our tank can only be tested (God forbid) in a real battle. But the fact that the achievements of our designers have been recognized by all the world's leading tank builders is encouraging. To drag the "partners" into rearmament of such an expensive component as an armored one - but will they pull? How will their tankers feel? Knowing that the Russians have this.
    1. shinobi
      shinobi 28 February 2016 12: 30 New
      0
      Initially, they planned it, but then they decided not to combine the command function. They talked about a crewless version of the tank. A complete robot with artificial intelligence.
    2. Rader
      Rader 28 February 2016 12: 46 New
      +5
      IMHO, it is necessary to reduce the crew of the tank to two people.

      The modern level of automation allows you to do this, BUT ... Unfortunately, the computer will not help when replacing the engine, or pulling the caterpillar ... Last year, in October (but the weather was normal), I had to help a friend: shove an old tracked tractor onto a trailer ... But from the beginning it was necessary to "put on" the tractor ... We (5 people) were tormented for an hour and a half, and it was worth a miracle technique (of the 50s?) To climb the ramp, as the harp flew off again ...
      The service of a tanker is not only direct combat operations, but those servicing their "iron horse", and here it is, without a third pair of hands, it comes out somehow badly. hi
  9. sania275
    sania275 28 February 2016 12: 21 New
    0
    You don’t need to go to Syria to check, maybe by the summer you’ll need it in the southwest direction.
  10. RomanS
    RomanS 28 February 2016 12: 24 New
    0
    If they are experiencing in Syria (which is likely), then who will tell us about this?
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 28 February 2016 14: 03 New
      +1
      Quote: RomanS
      If in Syria and experience (which is likely)

      Nah ... not probablynot at all like that. Just for general reasons (there are a lot of them).

      And so - in Tagil there is such a special training ground. Here they are experiencing ..
  11. APASUS
    APASUS 28 February 2016 12: 24 New
    +2
    It’s certainly not worth dragging to Syria, but you need to buy TOW from the Babaev and fire at Armata, I think there is still something to fire at the SA and Qatar has already provided their fosterlings
    1. Rostovchanin
      Rostovchanin 28 February 2016 15: 55 New
      0
      It’s certainly not worth dragging to Syria, but you need to buy TOW from the Babaev and fire at Armata, I think there is still something to fire at the SA and Qatar has already provided their fosterlings
      Funny you ... why buy when you can take a trophy ....
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 28 February 2016 18: 53 New
        +2
        Quote: Rostovchanin
        You are funny.

        I'm glad I could make you laugh
        Quote: Rostovchanin
        why buy when you can take a trophy ....

        The shelling is planned and the whole test depends on whether the TOW is beaten off or not, the kit is not a kit, with ammunition or repair, a bunch of components that depend more on luck.
        For money, you can buy directly with the bum .......... you understand the east .........
  12. askort154
    askort154 28 February 2016 12: 26 New
    +1
    It was infa that in the US tank building came to "O".
    The only plant left in Daytroit ceased to exist, as the city itself became a ghost.
  13. Vita vko
    Vita vko 28 February 2016 12: 27 New
    +1
    We use GALS technology
    Probably all the same STELS technology.
  14. Masya masya
    Masya masya 28 February 2016 12: 33 New
    +3
    The armor, as before, is strong
    And much for the tank
    The power of the tank troops is great,
    And Russia is proud of you!
    GOOD LUCK!
  15. morprepud
    morprepud 28 February 2016 12: 36 New
    +1
    И fifth level protection, and never having analogues:
    "Here is the Russian Spirit, here it smells of Russia"!
  16. xam0
    xam0 28 February 2016 12: 40 New
    0
    The news is very good, the crews need to be trained for such equipment, so that it does not work like in Syria, where the T-90 was sent for testing in combat conditions. The day before yesterday, the first video with the hit of the TOU in the T-90 was released, the tank survived with flying colors, but the crew (apparently from Iranians) got caught in the eastern doltzbaysky: the "curtain" was not turned on, the hatches were not closed (therefore, the gunner in the turret received a concussion), but the whole crew is alive, the remote control is activated, the tank is not destroyed. If the Armata is even more protected, then it's just a cool car.
  17. yuriy55
    yuriy55 28 February 2016 12: 41 New
    +1
    The main thing is that the very creation of "Armata" is not only the creation of a tank or a heavy platform. This is a change in the tactics of combined arms combat, tactics for motorized rifle subunits and units, the removal of a running infantryman from the battlefield.
    Here are the prospects: (I apologize for the materials of last year)
    In addition to a tank, an infantry fighting vehicle and a repair vehicle, a heavy anti-tank self-propelled gun, a group defense vehicle capable of fighting robots and other equipment will be created on the basis of the Armata platform, Vyacheslav Khalitov, deputy director general of Uralvagonzavod, told Vestnik Mordovii.

    Completely:

    http://searchnews.info/newsrussia/73814-iz-armaty-sdelayut-ubiycu-tankov-i-robot

    ov.html
  18. Skym
    Skym 28 February 2016 12: 42 New
    +1
    See the tank? And he is)))))
    1. MASK
      MASK 28 February 2016 12: 46 New
      +1
      Quote: SkyM
      See the tank? And he is)))))

      So far ... And then we'll see! hi
  19. Rus62
    Rus62 28 February 2016 12: 48 New
    +1
    The gray-haired Ural forges first-class weapons, to the envy of all enemies.
  20. Valera999
    Valera999 28 February 2016 12: 58 New
    -3
    The tank tower is wondering whether 800 mm godfather can withstand or not ??? It looks very cardboard.
  21. BOB044
    BOB044 28 February 2016 13: 07 New
    0
    UVZ: 20 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles on the Armata platform are currently being tested
    It sounds cynical, but why not check it in battle conditions. Let some systems in Syria. I think that you need to wait for any result and draw conclusions. This is our safety and combat ability of the crews.
  22. black
    black 28 February 2016 13: 08 New
    0
    On the basis of Almaty it would be necessary to run something like Terminator. The generals pinched this idea. They feel sorry for the money. Infantry is not a pity.
  23. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 28 February 2016 13: 29 New
    +3
    T-14 at UVZ has already been shot at full. Case-sieve on a small, as always with new products. So security is known. And it makes little sense to send to Syria. While it is necessary to drive these cars in all climatic zones of the country.
  24. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 28 February 2016 13: 47 New
    0
    it would be better if they honestly wrote - they will be purchased for the army after the tests, or procurement will be postponed for later because of the high cost. although now postpone n then the purchase-means there is no time to buy ...
  25. vanavatny
    vanavatny 28 February 2016 13: 47 New
    +6
    In what class of the evening school are students offering to send him to Syria?
    1. Your friend
      Your friend 28 February 2016 13: 59 New
      +6
      Quote: vanavate
      In what class of the evening school are students offering to send him to Syria?

      That would be to send these "proposers" to Syria for testing ...)
  26. lkom11
    lkom11 28 February 2016 14: 50 New
    -3
    Tremble mattress covers .....
    1. Yarik
      Yarik 28 February 2016 18: 45 New
      +2
      Why tremble? Explain.
  27. Mikelanjelo
    Mikelanjelo 28 February 2016 16: 02 New
    +6
    Who did not see
    1. Rossiyanin
      Rossiyanin 28 February 2016 18: 10 New
      0
      Good movie.
  28. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 28 February 2016 16: 03 New
    0
    Of course, I would like to see a full story of the tests and capabilities of the tank, but apparently it may not be soon. In the meantime, we hope that it is really the most!
  29. question
    question 28 February 2016 17: 02 New
    0
    Here they shout, we need more, more! Are we already attacked? No, not yet visible. There will be many of them, NATO will make a fuss, they will come up with their own, they can. Race again? Do we need it? So there is not enough money, not everyone was even compensated for their retirement! Slowly, slowly, wisely?
  30. Yarik
    Yarik 28 February 2016 18: 43 New
    -1
    I haven’t heard about the Abrams at the parade in Washington. But the thing is, at the very least, they are at war. The Armenians were at the parade in Moscow.
  31. PKK
    PKK 28 February 2016 19: 31 New
    0
    Quote: Irokez
    It's good. But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.

    You can’t send Armata to Syria. There is an inferior War. Aviation does not hit, there are few tanks in response, the art is outdated. Therefore, it’s better not to shine until the new tank. There is enough work without Syria. And you can’t send specialists there, very secret ones.
  32. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 28 February 2016 20: 21 New
    0
    Quote: Irokez
    It's good. But here to Syria Armata for a little check, well, at least three things.

    early. as the aircraft were put into operation for a long time, so are the tanks now. complicated technique today.
  33. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 28 February 2016 21: 23 New
    -2
    Quote: GSH-18
    So I have no doubt that the corresponding industrial capacities were prepared in advance according to the delivery plan

    And you doubt it in vain - Sienko knows where and how much money was buried and how much he got from his comrades!
    As they used to say: "such friends for a place, but for a museum!" All their Blah-blah-blah are a verbal fog to cover unseemly deeds. As the saying goes: if you want to fail a business, look for an "effective manager"! Today, however, as in the late dear Leonid Ilyich, personal responsibility is completely absent, the so-called. top managers, for completing the assigned tasks, achieving the desired results for the allocated money. That is why "cut Shura, cut" T-14 - it is golden! sad
  34. Energy
    Energy 28 February 2016 23: 40 New
    +4
    With Armata too much PR, in my opinion.
    It would be better to conduct all the tests, run in, train the crews, establish rembases, send them to the troops, and only then to parades and exhibitions ...
  35. beech
    beech 29 February 2016 04: 11 New
    0
    PR really a lot! And who was caught there when the armata was passed to the adversary !?
  36. Taygerus
    Taygerus 29 February 2016 07: 46 New
    0
    the news is excellent, the main thing is that they run in at the training ground and cure children's diseases, and then to the troops and more, more
  37. Falconmg
    Falconmg 29 February 2016 19: 20 New
    0
    Meanwhile, a bankruptcy lawsuit was filed against Kurganmashzavod http://news.rambler.ru/business/32913957/
    1. minirulet
      minirulet 1 March 2016 14: 58 New
      0
      This is unfortunate guys (((
  38. tank64rus
    tank64rus 1 March 2016 16: 30 New
    0
    Strange things are happening. One thing is clear if real people for whom Russia is not an empty phrase will lead, then there will be Armata and much more. If “effective managers” continue to lead (steal), then there will be no Armata, and there will be no Russia either.
  39. complete zero
    complete zero 1 March 2016 18: 56 New
    0
    it seems that the main value of Armata is not in this ... but in the fact that it is a PLATFORM ... ("Lego constructor") with all the ensuing advantages ... regarding the degrees of protection (2 and 3), active reactive armor will also be applied to Western vehicles, as well as the shooting of anti-missiles, etc.