Military Review

Pistollet Arkady Skachkova

46
Pistollet Arkady SkachkovaArkady Skachkov is the author of the books Pistol's Self-Tutorial on Aimless, Instinctive, Dynamic Shooting in Defensive Movement and The Art of the First Shot. Chairman of the Pistoletchik shooting club (St. Petersburg). The developer of simulators and programs for training in shooting in stressful conditions. The editor of the self-defense section of the "Shotgun" magazine. Author of more than two hundred publications in a dozen Russian and foreign armory magazines. Judge of international competitions of security services and security companies. Judge of the International Confederation of Practical Shooting.


He began studying shooting in the 1995 year in St. Petersburg. Since 1998, during 5 years, I studied in the USA with different instructors. In 2003, he returned to Russia, where he continued to teach shooting skills according to the method: “Trainings of Counterattacks (TREN)”. Engaged in S.N. Putilin (Lipetsk).

Judging by the ad on his website, students learn the following skills:

- quick extraction of weapons from the holster,

- instant shot,

- shooting in motion,

- hidden snatch,

- protection against armed and unarmed attacks,

- shooting with carrying,

- two-plane shooting

- intuitive shooting

- and many others.


But let's get started:

- What is a pendulum, what does it give?

“The pendulum is a system that I first saw in reality when I met S.N. in Lipetsk. Putilin. No one else could shake me so much in the cinema, but in life I have not seen my skills and they go far beyond the framework of hand-to-hand combat. The pendulum is at first glance just a system of exercises, something resembling rocking from side to side with the obligatory holding of tension and rhythm. You do them and watch how something changes in you month after month. Then you add more and more tricks, but their speed and strength grows. In a narrow fighting sense, the pendulum is a system that allows you to increase speed and power.

- With using what?

- Have you noticed that when you notice something with peripheral vision, you react to it faster than when you notice with the front? This is due to the fact that when we notice something with frontal vision, first the information goes to the brain to assess what it is, whether it is dangerous or not, and only then the brain gives the command to perform some action. But when we notice something with peripheral vision, there is no assessment period, we react immediately. By eliminating this evaluation period, the speed increases. This is a schematic explanation and it does not fully reveal the essence of the technique.

- That is, peripheral vision includes instincts?

- I would not like to go deeper, because there may be a wrong understanding. And Sergei Putilin doesn’t like to explain this, but simply says to swing the pendulum. It is necessary to do, and not to talk about it. Try to walk at night in the park or forest, and you will immediately see how your perception will change. You still do not have time to understand what it flashed from the side, and already bounce.

I give the task to my students to shoot at a target, controlling it only with peripheral vision, and they hit the target! How - they do not know, and there is nothing.

- That is, you are a supporter of the principle "To be able to do more than you know"? The main thing to do and do effectively?

- Yes, and everything must be worked out for a long time. The essence of all techniques - turn off the "analyzer". And that is the mind. This at times increases the speed. By the way, such techniques also develop some interesting abilities, but I don’t want to talk about it in order not to be accused of charlatanry.

- And right. It is believed that the Soviet system of hand-to-hand combat was going very quickly.

- I do not agree with this approach and I consider it a sign of quackery - when they promise to teach something for a short period of time anywhere - in learning English, for example. When someone says that in a month 2 will make you a fighter, it means that this person just needs your money. You should always study, study, take time. I rocked the pendulum Putilin 9 months, although, he usually says that it is necessary 6 months. And I downloaded not for 45 minutes, but for 2-3 hours. And some people need to download the 3 of the year altogether in order for them to "get it". Although, not everyone is capable of such. It just happens that a person did something for a long time, then it worked for him, and he forgot about how long he was going. And he begins to think that everything can be done quickly. But it does not happen.

We practiced 5 attack situations every day - and we were already trained people. And in the course of the work, they revealed only 2 skills, which absolutely accurately decide the outcome of the fight: the fastest possible shot first, and instant departure from the line of attack. And more importantly - to combine both. We worked out all possible ways of leaving the line of attack. We must reach such a level that if someone knocked you down from behind, then you were already on the ground with a weapon in your hand, and you had time to shoot. And these 2 skills need to hollow, hollow, hollow ... But this is not art yet, but a craft.

- In this case, you probably need to keep fit?

- No, it's still not a sport. Shooting is good enough to get to a certain level, and then maintain your skills by practicing 15-20 minutes a day. But first you need to come to this, as you can see.

It is very important to be able to shoot not precisely. Not on the front and rear sights and not in the direction of the trunk, but on the sense of direction of the trunk in the hand. This is the only way to get on a moving target not in sporting conditions, where it swings evenly back and forth and does not just travel in the same direction at the same speed as in a regular dash, as in practical shooting - because you can still analyze and calculate the target motion. In the life of the target so stupid and predictable are not. So - I teach shooting 20 for years, and during that time only one person managed to hit the SIGHT from the first time at a moving target, not knowing exactly how it will move. And I think that he did it by chance.

- How do you feel about the system of A. Gavrilov's Battle Intuitive Shooting (which we have already written about)? Are there any similarities with the pendulum of S. Putilin?

- I spoke with both Gavrilov and one of his students, NUMX. I believe that in fact these are the same systems - but this is my personal opinion, and please note this. Just Putilin pendulum melee, and there are small differences from the approach of Gavrilov - in movements and other points. For example, when shooting you need to move more smoothly. Shaking the Putilin pendulum, I began to gradually figure out how to do this with a gun. But there were some inconveniences. And only having familiarized myself with the LSI system, I understood what and how it should be corrected for firing. That is, the system is one, but the goals are slightly different - shooting and "man-made". Because of this, and a slightly different approach. Well, a different explanation. Putilin says that a stretch and a rhythm are needed for a pendulum - without this, it will not work. Gavrilov explains this with the help of his “ghaek” - but in fact it’s the same thing. Or Putilin gives exercises to develop a sense of loss of balance. And Gavrilov gives such an example - go through thin ice and watch the chill in your chest. That is, they talk about the same condition.

You can take the shadow boxing from boxing as an example. Imagine that you are using the same technique for shooting - the base will remain boxing, and the movements themselves will change a little. And it is natural.

- What other similar systems are there?

- There is the direction of KhorA, with whom I personally am not familiar, but I read the book, and I considered it similar. There was also one Cossack Savior.

- What kind of Savior? They are at least 20 now.

- I do not know, it was in 2003 year. I was told that it was Cossack Savior. Then one was known. and now there are dozens of them. It will be the same with everything - we already have a pendulum in St. Petersburg, but not words about Putilin. If tomorrow there will be twenty more pendulum-style mentors, I would not be surprised, but I will not take my word for it.

- How do you feel about Potapov?

- I believe that he collected all the information that can be and well combined it.

- And who did he learn from?

- Ask this question to him.

- Arkady, thanks for the answers!

In the direction of A. Skachkov, principles are applied that are essentially identical to the principles of "Russian style":

1. Situations in which the shooter has to use weapons for self-defense are sudden, varied and unpredictable. Therefore, in order to foster the ability to act correctly in such situations, it is necessary to make every effort so that the training of the shooters not only approaches in their intensity, variety and complexity to real fire contacts, but also surpasses them.

2. Attack situations are more varied than any rifle dogma. The method of training should be based not on technology that will save in all situations of attack, but on the situations themselves in which the shooter may need to apply various weapons possession techniques that do not fit within the boundaries of a single rifle technique.
Author:
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. PKK
    PKK 1 March 2016 07: 02 New
    +1
    The most amazing thing comes when you move to a different time category, at a different reaction time. There is a feeling that you are engaged in a magical secret, closed from the average person. And this is not difficult and does not require much effort.
    1. brn521
      brn521 1 March 2016 10: 12 New
      +3
      Quote: PKK
      And it is not difficult and does not require much effort.

      It's not the same for everybody. Someone's spinal cord picks up similar techniques on the fly. And someone on the contrary, strong immunity.
  2. K-50
    K-50 1 March 2016 07: 21 New
    +3
    About the "pendulum" I read the statement of one specialist from the FSB counterterrorism: "swing, don't swing, but as many times as you need to hit the target, I'll hit as many times. More or less like this.
    What I mean is that if the shooter has a sufficiently high shooting training, the "pendulum" and other dances will only sweat before death, if the shooter is inept, then he will hit the target only by accident and point blank. request
    1. Saling
      Saling 1 March 2016 12: 11 New
      0
      here is a great example, that with real fire contact, the gunman shoots who and what is there and how he leaves the line of attack wink
    2. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 1 March 2016 19: 39 New
      +1
      Quote: K-50
      download, don’t download, but as many times as you need to hit the target, I’ll get so much

      To hit with anything, a bullet, a knife, even a stone, you need to create a connection, a "link" with the goal. Strange, but with some people it is extremely difficult to create a "link". So your acquaintance may not be right, despite all the preparation. But it is quite possible that he is such a strong shooter that he will kill any resistance, then he is right.
  3. Riv
    Riv 1 March 2016 08: 18 New
    +7
    I saw this "self-instruction manual". A useful book, although more for a security guard in my opinion. And not even so much in terms of pistol ownership (if not a lazy person, then you will learn to shoot from a service one and quickly bare the barrel), but rather for the correct reaction. The security guard rarely acts proactively. More often than not, his actions are the answer, so it is very important to anticipate the danger in advance. And about the pendulum - also the point of view of the guard. On the line of dagger fire "swinging" is useless. What pistol, what submachine gun. The result will be the same: kill. And the pendulum should be aimed precisely at not being killed.

    I was taught at one time that the pendulum is what I am. Or my squad, or even a company. And the axis is the enemy (s). The pendulum then swings to neutralize the enemy, and not to suffer. And there is no need to portray the Matrix under the bullets, it's stupid. Even Bruce Lee will not dodge the line. It is necessary to "wind" the thread of the pendulum so that the enemy himself wants to throw down the weapon.

    A simple example: prisoners escaped with weapons. This is the axis. They have a group with a dog on their tail. They keep in touch, do not let them come off, but they don’t get into a fight. This is a thread. And the operational platoon, which receives weapons, ammunition and is transferred where necessary. This is a pendulum. And if the pendulum swings correctly, then the convicts will be imposed, hostages will not be taken and they will lay down their weapons. Less dust, shorter life. To do this, you need to see the whole situation, up to the point that you know all the manholes on the ground. Then everything turns out.

    Doom played? Q2DM1 remember? Who knows the card, he wins. Also a peculiar example of a pendulum. And just jumping under the bullets - this is no show off.
  4. Riv
    Riv 1 March 2016 08: 30 New
    +2
    ... Or one more example: "In August 44th". From my point of view, the ambush at the end of the book is not organized correctly. If the bushes are at a direct shot distance, then why, having stopped the saboteurs, not immediately withdraw the submachine gun squad? Put everyone in the grass with their noses, then apologize if they were caught by mistake. And the major from the commandant's office would have been alive, and the Smershevets had a whole head off, and the saboteurs had been taken.

    Well, okay, they had their own approach there and their own experience. Hence the moral: a "pendulum" is different for everyone, and after reading such self-instruction manuals, remember: you can run into a person for whom you will be the "axis". And even if you even have a pistol in each hand, it will end up wrapping you all the same.
    1. Alexez
      Alexez 1 March 2016 09: 01 New
      11
      As far as I remember the book, Smershevites needed a "moment of truth". And in the option of putting a platoon of machine gunners all in the grass, most likely, they would receive a mountain of corpses and zero information.
    2. Glot
      Glot 1 March 2016 10: 34 New
      +4
      ... Or one more example: "In August 44th". From my point of view, the ambush at the end of the book is not organized correctly. If the bushes are at a direct shot distance, then why, having stopped the saboteurs, not immediately withdraw the submachine gun squad? Put everyone in the grass with their noses, then apologize if they were caught by mistake. And the major from the commandant's office would have been alive, and the Smershevets had a whole head off, and the saboteurs had been taken.


      Nah, they wouldn’t have laid their nose in the grass. Wrong people.
      Instantly attacked this squad, those of them and ... as there the general seems to have said: The military operation gives only corpses? Well, they would have taken them cold and silent.
      1. Riv
        Riv 1 March 2016 11: 01 New
        -1
        And who is talking about the military operation? Wolfhounds were gathered there from all fronts. Could reinforce ambushes at least in the main areas? Probably yes. As a result, after all, all the same, the shooting began and only one saboteur was taken alive.
        But, I repeat, everyone has their own specifics. It seemed safer to get out under the bullets? Well, we got out ourselves. Their work.
        1. Glot
          Glot 1 March 2016 11: 29 New
          +5
          And who is talking about the military operation? Wolfhounds were gathered there from all fronts. Could reinforce ambushes at least in the main areas? Probably yes. As a result, after all, all the same, the shooting began and only one saboteur was taken alive.
          But, I repeat, everyone has their own specifics. It seemed safer to get out under the bullets? Well, we got out ourselves. Their work.


          Ehh, Bogomolov did not have you as a co-author. And then they would explain how it should have been. laughing
        2. kostya_a
          kostya_a 1 March 2016 11: 35 New
          +2
          Read Bogomolov's book "The Moment of Truth", everything is detailed there, what, why and why.
        3. Assistant
          Assistant 1 March 2016 12: 32 New
          +4
          As a result, after all, all the same, the shooting began and only one saboteur was taken alive.


          Two. Of which one was gutted right on the spot.

          Wolfhounds were gathered there from all fronts.


          Can you recall in which chapter this is said? And then somehow I do not remember. I remember, on the contrary, cried that instead of interceptors they overtook a crowd of soldiers from the front who had no idea about the capture of objects alive. Even the chief heroes were given help not by an interceptor, but by a commandant.

          But, I repeat, everyone has their own specifics. It seemed safer to get out under the bullets? Well, we got out ourselves. Their work.


          In the middle of the book they intercepted one (not a group!) With the help of machine gunners. With a natural result.
          1. Riv
            Riv 1 March 2016 15: 03 New
            +2
            "The door to the next room was open, and there were no bunk bunks.
            undressing slept several officers with epaulets of different branches of the army on
            tunics; two senior lieutenants, young and strong guys, sat and
            cleaned the machines.
            - From Moscow ... - managed to whisper to Andrey Khizhnyak, - the whole plane ...
            And the apartment, where the group spent the night more than once, was also occupied ...
            All arrivals were about the same age (twenty
            five to thirty years), as the selection is strong, muscular; except guns
            they had personal machines bandaged with windings on the road. And Andrey
            it dawned on: "Cleaners!"; most likely not just cleaners, but how
            expressed Tamantsev, "wolfhounds".
            The whole plane - in two months of Andrei’s counterintelligence service
            didn't happen. "

            http://lib.ru/PROZA/BOGOMOLOW/august44.txt
            Chapter 53

            Two.

            Yes, I forgot. Nevertheless, they had to be taken in an open collision, with the use of weapons by both sides and could have taken no one at all. Of course, I look from my bell tower: a well-fixed patient does not need anesthesia. Piled up, tied, then search how much will fit.
            1. Saling
              Saling 1 March 2016 15: 24 New
              0
              Dear, "The Moment of Truth" is an ARTISTIC WORK. All this is the author's fantasy. Evaluating it and drawing conclusions is like studying martial arts from Bruce Lee's films or from the 9th company, the tactics of military operations in the mountains. In Soviet times, beginner karatekas did just that. In the place of real preparation, they tried to imitate on-screen characters. wink Time passed, but no one made any conclusions.
              1. gladcu2
                gladcu2 1 March 2016 16: 30 New
                +3
                Sailing
                To fantasize, you need to know something. Within the framework of Bogomolov’s time, he had the knowledge that he described in the book.
                1. Saling
                  Saling 1 March 2016 16: 54 New
                  +2
                  What knowledge Bogomolov had can only be judged by people who served with him or performed the functions described in the book. And then Viktor Suvorov won the same knowledge of the Special Staff of the GRU, which he described in the book wink And all hanging their ears and holding their breath read about "fights with" dolls "And people who were aware of the issue laughed from the author and readers. wink
                  I flipped through the magazine and, reaching the point of hand-to-hand training, when commandos practiced sparring in prisoners, coughed, and then laughed out loud. This is nonsense! Although there is some truthful grain, and I read about it for the first time, but still ... I imagined Zeleny fighting with some tattooed urka, and again I was twisted with laughter. And if Pop forced me to write a compendium on this subject? here it would be possible to carry nonsense! ..
                  - Stop laughing, you zadolbal! - Vova Stepnoy pushed me in the side. - Let's fuck the magazine on me rewrite! I, damn it, stood in line behind you at the "Aquarium". You don't read a shit, you laugh like a horse. Edik Voroshilov read yesterday, so all day, like a madman, he fell from the stool ...
                  - Vova, forget it! it’s written well, but such, damn it, garbage.
                  - What do you understand! He sat at a gas station on the shore, did not stick his nose out, and here - about the special forces! military intelligence elite !!
                  “Yeah, I didn’t stick it out,” I burst out.
                  I still lacked conversations with the school special officer on these slippery topics. "You were warned", "You were instructed" and so on ... A. Zagortsev "Sailor Spn"
                  1. kostya_a
                    kostya_a 1 March 2016 21: 27 New
                    +2
                    Yes, undoubtedly this is primarily a work of fiction with elements of a detective story and some things look very adventurous, but on the other hand, judging from the History of the Creation of the Novel, Vladimir Osipovich very meticulously approached the writing and checked all the facts several times. Even the place was not chosen by chance. And even such petty elements as "Shooting in Macedonian" or Swinging the pendulum are also not accidentally present in the book. Reviews of the novel were very flattering at one time, from famous people. Well, of course, do not forget the soviet censorship with which he had to fight.
            2. Assistant
              Assistant 2 March 2016 00: 16 New
              0
              Chapter 53


              Thank you for reminding me!
            3. Mikhail3
              Mikhail3 2 March 2016 14: 34 New
              +1
              Quote: Riv
              From Moscow ... - managed to whisper to Andrey Khizhnyak, - a whole plane ...

              Do you remember where they were placed? A book is really worth remembering, a good book. This whole plane was smashed in tiny groups across the search territory, and these people, of course, weren’t enough for anything. All that the commander could do was put Alekhine’s group in one of the places where the probability was higher. In one of! And then this was done with some tension, seemingly semi-underground. There was no talk of reinforcing this particular group by anyone else from the specialists and it could not be.
        4. Rivares
          Rivares 1 March 2016 19: 02 New
          +1
          Quote: Riv
          Could reinforce ambushes at least in the main areas? Probably yes. As a result, all the same, the shooting started and only one saboteur was taken alive.

          Two at least. They’d read more closely .. there is an explanation why there was no platoon of machine gunners, and there are also explanations for all your misunderstandings.
    3. AK64
      AK64 1 March 2016 13: 10 New
      +2
      From my point of view, the ambush is not organized correctly in the final of the book. If the bushes are at a distance of a direct shot, then why, having stopped the saboteurs, didn’t immediately withdraw the squadron?

      (1) Spies would shoot themselves
      (2) Organolepticism does not allow to establish the authenticity of documents, but it would mean that they would have to be put in pre-installation and checked for a long time. And so a provocation that could not but be bought.
      1. Riv
        Riv 1 March 2016 15: 09 New
        +1
        So a bad, worthless ambush, if the spy manages to shoot himself. And he must - lie down, blink and spoil the air with fear.

        Not, well, if you hadn’t bought a provocation? If Mishchenko theirs immediately suspected something was wrong and would give a sign to shoot? But he could. Well, what is it - a commandant’s patrol in the middle of the forest? Officer! And one in HB, and the second in the parade ... This is normal, they always check that ...
        1. Rivares
          Rivares 1 March 2016 19: 14 New
          +1
          Quote: Riv
          So a bad, worthless ambush, if the spy manages to shoot himself. And he must - lie down, blink and spoil the air with fear.

          I am sure you would have neutralized everyone! They would definitely choose a place in the forest where a group of unknown composition would come up to you and lay down their arms. By the way, did you often ambush experienced enemy scouts? Share your experience with us readers)
          1. Riv
            Riv 1 March 2016 22: 58 New
            0
            Well, of course. When there is nothing more to object, it begins: "And you yourself! .."
            :)))
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 1 March 2016 19: 46 New
      +1
      Quote: Riv
      Do not immediately withdraw the branch of machine gunners?

      Because in war it doesn’t happen that you have exactly the required forces anywhere. If you read carefully, you would pay attention to two things. First, Alekhine did not have a branch, and it was not possible to give him people; time was considered minutes.
      And secondly, a submachine gun squad? Front-line soldiers at best? The saboteurs would immediately, without talking, begin fire contact, trying to break away. "There are no silent ambushes."
      1. Riv
        Riv 1 March 2016 23: 23 New
        0
        The commandant’s officer was found for him, but it turns out that the submachine gunners were more difficult? .. Despite the fact that these submachine gunners around the cordoned zone read an entire division, they rode in cars.

        Well, the quote from the Strugatsky here is certainly very appropriate. Rumata Esther - he is also a wolfhound and special on pendulums. :)))
  5. brn521
    brn521 1 March 2016 10: 20 New
    +4
    when we notice something with peripheral vision, there is no evaluation period, we respond immediately. By eliminating this evaluation period, the speed increases

    At the same time, the number of accidents increases proportionally.
    1. Saling
      Saling 1 March 2016 11: 21 New
      0
      Like in a joke: Ensign, THINK! - Figley to think, you have to jump! wink
      1. Saling
        Saling 1 March 2016 12: 36 New
        +3
        Judging by the training examples from Skachkov’s book, accidents are one of the essential elements of training. wink
        1. Riv
          Riv 1 March 2016 15: 32 New
          +1
          So with the machine, you can distort the shutter with one hand. But this is pampering. Plus, when jerking the shutter in this way, making a random shot is in my opinion easier than two fingers to piss.
        2. uragan114
          uragan114 1 March 2016 20: 56 New
          0
          Quote: Saling
          Judging by the training examples from Skachkov’s book, accidents are one of the essential elements of training. wink


          I don’t understand in what circus it is necessary to show, distort the pistol shutter with one hand? .. for what?
          Tell people this is generally practical ??
          1. Mikhail3
            Mikhail3 2 March 2016 14: 40 New
            0
            Quote: uragan114
            Tell people this is generally practical ??

            Absolutely impractical. And this is not done to get a real skill at all.
  6. AleBors
    AleBors 1 March 2016 11: 43 New
    +1
    Another guru. The truth is somewhere nearby. Pendulum, goydok and so on. There is benefit in this, as well as in intuitive shooting. I see no harm in that, it is a pity I am not familiar with the methodology of the listed authors in detail.
  7. AK64
    AK64 1 March 2016 13: 15 New
    +1
    Judging by the photo (how the gun holds, and how it stands), it would be better not to read the "self-instruction manual"

    This, and the stand, and the grip, and, most importantly, glasses, similar to the American cops (police) - and most importantly here are the glasses.
    1. Mwg
      Mwg 5 March 2016 22: 11 New
      0
      American shooting system is really nothing
  8. gladcu2
    gladcu2 1 March 2016 16: 23 New
    +1
    Respectfully to the author and specialist.

    But let me ask myself a question. This is who you need to be in order to get into a hole, and suddenly start firing in different directions for an unknown danger.

    Well, I understand the situation when my work is related to power grabs. Well, even in this case, a surprise attack can be foreseen.
    I won’t go deeper, but the article added Skpsis.
  9. Egevich
    Egevich 1 March 2016 17: 17 New
    +2
    a persistent feeling that fetishists are somewhere nearby ... and their main fetish is the expression "swing a pendulum" ... without a sucker and life is bad ... everyone goes crazy in their own way ...
  10. Massik
    Massik 1 March 2016 20: 30 New
    +2
    This is popular in America, but we have no use for it. The guns are dumb.
    1. Saling
      Saling 1 March 2016 21: 15 New
      +1
      That's it. Such, if I may say so, courses must begin with the words: Now you will learn how to get a guaranteed prison term winkif you do not kill yourself during training wink
  11. trantor
    trantor 1 March 2016 20: 38 New
    +3
    Quote: Riv
    And just jumping under the bullets - this is no show off.

    "War is not who is running over whom, but who will change his mind." (c) B. Vasiliev, And the dawns here are quiet.
    1. Riv
      Riv 2 March 2016 09: 54 New
      +1
      Another hot topic: about "Dawns". In fact, the book and the film should have been called "How Not to Fight."

      See for yourself: you have a subordinate unit with extremely dubious combat value. Only you have the combat experience applicable in this situation. Limited applicable - another fighter. Against you - a well-trained unit of the enemy, trained and at times superior to you in strength. You have only one trump card: you are on your territory, and the enemy is on a stranger and forced to hide.

      In such a situation, the only correct thing is the following: to maintain contact with the enemy, in no case to disclose their forces, to notify the command as soon as possible. The foreman did the opposite. He lit up all the forces subordinate to him, sent a single soldier to contact (and it was necessary at least two, even two at a time, to two addresses), which failed the task and finally entered the battle with the enemy. Happy end thanks to the Great Random.
  12. 0000
    0000 1 March 2016 21: 08 New
    +2

    "- Yes, and everything must be worked out for a long time. The essence of all techniques - turn off the "analyzer". And that is the mind. This at times increases the speed. By the way, such techniques also develop some interesting abilities, but I don’t want to talk about it in order not to be accused of charlatanry."
    good

    Stopping internal dialogue is the only way to do this. Everything else is just talk.
    The warrior is aware of this and seeks to end his internal dialogue.

    Carlos Castaneda Wheel of Time


    Stopping internal dialogue is one of the main tasks of magic. wink
    1. Saling
      Saling 1 March 2016 21: 37 New
      +1
      Mage 80LVL wink Points +20 Magic Power wink
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. Riv
    Riv 2 March 2016 10: 10 New
    +1
    Want more Temko for sracha?
    The article contains a phrase that we see more with our peripheral vision than with our direct vision. In fact, we see exactly the same amount, but we do not analyze all the information. Example: there is a tree on your right for two hours. You can see it. Without moving your gaze, define: it is a poplar, or an aspen. Most likely you won't. But if a wasp flies in the same sector, the gaze will immediately be directed in that direction. You even think, "Wasp!" - did not have time, and already look at her. These are reflexes.

    Another example: a safety valve on the steam line is triggered on my block. Sudden loud roar. The lab technician jumps about a meter and barks nearby, and I turn my head slightly to make sure that the steam comes from the correct pipe. It's a habit. The valve works quite often, I am internally ready for this, therefore I do not pay much attention. But if the shutter of the machine gun is twisted twenty meters away from me, I will probably hide before I realize this fact.

    The fact is that the brain processes ALL incoming information. In general, all. But only a small part of it comes to consciousness and after some time. Here the author seems not to be aware of this.
    1. PKK
      PKK April 9 2016 18: 44 New
      0
      There is a threshold of response in our consciousnesses, the consciousnesses of vision and hearing. Further, the reflex leads to actions, and the central consciousness has not yet turned on.