David Nicole on the Mughal Warfare (part of 3)

17
Strategy and tactics

The Mughal strategy was based on a combination of the use of elite cavalry and well-fortified defensive fortresses. At the same time, the Mughal tactics were flexible: they considered that the use of cavalry and war elephants was more effective in the plains of northern India than in the mountains of the Deccan or in the swamps of Bengal. The Mughals prepared their campaigns carefully and relied on superiority in strength. In the 17 century, Jai Singh, speaking out against the Marathas, tried, for example, to capture only those enemy fortresses that he could then hold and use to strangle the Maratha movement.

David Nicole on the Mughal Warfare (part of 3)

Agra was the capital of the Mughal Empire under Akbar.

It was customary to carry out wars during the dry season, although Akbar made an attempt to conduct at least one campaign during the monsoons, despite the floods and heavy rains. Aurangzeb used the big rivers when campaigning in Assam and Bihar. The combined operations of land, sea and river forces eventually became an important component of the military art of the Great Moguls.


Dagger bichwa.


Dagger pichwa: side view.

Army on the march

Among the many things that astounded European travelers of the 16 century, the organization of the movement of troops was almost in the first place. Father Antonio Monzerrat, a Jesuit missionary, wrote that he was watching a huge Indian army on the march and that the sight was very much struck by it. For example, that the heralds were going ahead of the main forces, warning the rulers of the small principalities so that they would not try to resist. And, of course, that the army, going through friendly or neutral territory, paid money for everything.


The Mughal Cavalry in battle, a miniature from 17’s early manuscript. Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

When moving, the army tried to avoid routes across the great plains, where there was not enough water, to avoid the mountains, where the troops were vulnerable to ambush, and where there were problems with crossings — to act with a large number of pioneers who cleared the road and built bridges and rafts. They were commanded by a senior military engineer, and local governors and subordinate rulers were to provide them with boats and building material.


Saber tulvar 17 -18 vv. India-Afghanistan.

The Mughals marched under the cover of the scouts. Those were supposed to look for sources of drinking water, access to fuel, that is, to firewood, and - most importantly, close or far away is the enemy. Signals were given by means of pipes, so that the troops had time to prepare even for a sudden attack.


Siege of the fortress Ratamdor. Miniature from the Akbarname manuscript, about xNumx, Victoria and Albert Museum, London.

Akbar is credited with inventing a new plan for the camp, which was done to make it easier for the soldiers to make it easier for them to navigate, because the camp of many thousands was a whole city where it was easy to get lost. That is why, for example, a high pillar-beacon was placed in the center of the camp on which a fire was burning at night, which served as a guide for the troops. Artillery gathered in one part of the camp, the cavalry in the other, the infantry in the third. Each army had its own "square" in which all important matters were decided.


Indian mace shishpar, most likely from Rajasthan, 18 in., Hilt on the model of the sword of the hand. Royal Arsenal in Leeds, England.

The trusted members of the emperor's family personally inspected the perimeter of the camp every night, and if the guard did not turn up at the post, or he was asleep, his nose was cut off as punishment. Usually, the camp was protected by woven fences of woven branches, and the positions of artillery were sandbags. From the beginning of the 18 century, the camp began to be strengthened with moats and equipped with positions for artillery. The senior bakhshi officer was in charge of drawing up the battle plan. Then he submitted this plan to the emperor for approval, as a rule, the day before the battle.


Indian thorny mace gurz. Albert Hall Museum, Japur, India.

The troops were distinguished by traditional signs for the Mongols, such as for example, with their hangings from yak tails, which had a pagan Central Asian origin. The lion and the sun, depicted on banners, were used by the Mongol rulers of Samarkand, even before Babur began to use them. Akbar distinguished himself with particularly complex symbolism, including several ... thrones used to symbolize the emperor's occupation, an umbrella decorated with precious stones, a brocade canopy, and many different colors of flags.


Indian dagger straight, 1605 – 1627's. Steel, gold, emeralds, glass, textiles, wood. Length with 37.1 sheath, see. Length without 35.4 sheath, see. Blade length, 23.2, see Metropolitan Museum, New York.

Mughal was very developed and military music. The battle started at the sign given by the big drums of the Panbat, as well as by the sounds of horns and battle cries. Other military instruments, including timpani, small drums, cymbals, and various pipes, created a powerful noise field that cheered on their warriors and overwhelmed the enemy warriors. The battle cry of the Muslim troops was typically Muslim: Allah Akbar ("Allah is greater ..."), Dean Din Muhammad ("Faith, Vera Muhammad"). The Hindus, for their part, often shouted "Gopal, Gopal," which was one of the names of the god Krishna.


Indian cast mortar 18 century., Made for Tipu-Sultan in Muzor. Royal Artillery Museum in Woolwich, England.

Babur’s tactical techniques were largely based on Tamerlan’s experience. The army was built according to a certain verified scheme: Baranghar - the right wing, Jamankhar - the left wing, Kharaval - the avant-garde and Gul - the center. Later, scouts, gunners, an ambush regiment, and the “military police” were included here to catch people retreating without orders.

The infantry used large wooden shanty shields widely, which was a further development of Tamerlane's ideas. Only under his cover were crossbowmen, and at Akbar - the musketeers. Most full-scale battles began with an artillery duel followed by attacks by cavalry units, first with one wing of the army, then with the other. The battle usually began in the morning and ceased in the evening if the army hoped to retreat under the cover of darkness. The main goal was to reach and overthrow the enemy commander, sitting on an elephant; if it succeeded, the battle could be considered won!

Other methods of fighting included a feigned retreat with the goal of ambushing the enemy; the deployment of infantry in the defile, the purpose of which was to kill the enemy commander; light cavalry attacks to attack the rear and transports. On occasion, horsemen dismounted to attack the unprotected stomachs of armored elephants with large daggers. By the end of the 17 century, some of the Mughal army cavalrymen had muskets, as well as bows; but the latter dominated, but the former were always lacking. Akbar made an attempt to create a mobile field artillery, which was already under Aurangzeb.

Siege

The art of siege fortified structures (as well as their construction!) Was very highly developed in pre-Islamic India. On the northern plains, fortifications were built on artificial mounds, often surrounded by moats with water or even marshes. In central India, many of the fortresses were built on natural rocks. In Sindh, Punjab and Bengal, where a good stone was scarce, brick was used, while in Kashmir some fortifications were made of wood. Babur brought with him new ideas related to the experience of Central Asia and Persian military architecture. So, when designing Indian fortresses, a lot of attention was paid to ensuring adequate water supply. Interestingly, various engineering tricks were used to counteract artillery, for example, tall bamboo fences and even living plots of the Opuntia cactus up to 20 feet!


The sea fort of Janjira. Was considered, and in fact was for centuries impregnable.


Construction of the fort continued on 22 of the year. Sheer walls sprout right out of the water. In the middle of two freshwater lakes - the stock of drinking war.

They tried to make the citadel stronger by building high walls in several rows, such as in the famous fortress in Agra, which had three walls built with ledges. Towards the end of the 16 century, the towers were not popular, but a strong slope of the walls, covered galleries on the walls, external galleries and "kiosks" above the gate were used. In the 17 century, the fortresses built by the Mughals received semicircular towers with a multitude of small box-shaped machining machines for shooting down. The old walls were reinforced, and embrasures for light guns were made in them. At the end of 17 and the beginning of 18, many buildings began to have a purely decorative meaning.


Huge guns of Fort Janjira. They were there 572! Not every sovereign in the army had so many cannons, but here they were all placed on a small, in fact, island!

Already in 1495, Babur wrote about the possibility of using smoke against enemy miners, who were doing a dig. Often, the defenders flooded them with water. The Rajputs defended the castles from Babur's troops, throwing stones and burning cotton bales on them, drenched in oil. During one of the sieges, behind the iron door leading into the castle, a strong fire was kindled, so the enemy could not touch it and open it. The outer gate was studded with large iron spikes against the elephants, which the besiegers used as live rams.

Catapults at the end of the 16 of the 20th century were still in use; but the guns became the most important means of siege warfare. During the siege of Chitora, a huge Rajput fortress, in 1567, the Mughal had three batteries, plus one large cannon that fired 40-pound stone cores. Interestingly, this massive weapon was cast directly on the spot, on top of a nearby hill, to avoid having to drag it up the steep slopes. Other siege companies included paschs or sandbags; Sarcob or Damdam was a wooden siege tower; in a word, covered trenches were called sabat; Jala - a raft of inflated skins that could carry up to 80 people, narbudan - a common staircase and kamand - a rope ladder; Tours - heavy manteleth.


Akbar's infantry and artillery (Angus McBride's design): 1 - infantry officer, 2 - artilleryman, 3 - boomey (militia soldier). In the distance, oxen carry one of those huge cannons that India was so famous for at that time.

Some of the siege works were simply colossal in scope. Sabbaths are described for ten horsemen riding side by side, and deep enough to completely hide a man riding an elephant. However, in order to successfully complete the siege, even the army of Akbar often had to resort not to arms, and to the power of money, especially if it lasted for several years.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    4 March 2016 07: 36
    Thanks, I hope there will be a continuation? I read it with pleasure .. Once I read about the sea fort of Janjir, but I see the photos in the first ..
    1. +3
      4 March 2016 08: 09
      I have to disappoint you. After all, this is a translation of the book by D. Nicolas of the "Osprey" edition. Therefore, I simply cannot write more. I do not know. And he ran out of text. They're small Osprey books - 35 pages of text. And then the captions under the pictures and historiography. As a result, 48 pages are published in the Main-at-Arms series. Of course, there are books by English-speaking authors on India, including the Indians themselves. But personally, I don't have them.
    2. +1
      4 March 2016 13: 37
      shishpar -bump on the feather -step, as it looks very similar, Sanskrit is a variant of the Russian ...
  2. +2
    4 March 2016 08: 04
    Very interesting article. Thank you, Vyacheslav Olegovich. Great photos.
    The troops were distinguished by traditional signs for the Mongols

    The variant of this name "Mogul", found among some authors, is explained by the absence of a back-language "n" ("ң") in their language (writing), in Latin - "ng". The English, for example, still pronounce this word quite close to the original: "Mongol".

    Author: Bayan Dayanov
    Source: http://shkolazhizni.ru/culture/articles/35130/
    © Shkolazhizni.ru
  3. Riv
    +10
    4 March 2016 08: 12
    Janjira - yes, the pearl of the fortification business. An impregnable, well-armed and ... completely useless fortress. The fort was supposed to cover a nearby port. But the strait between the fort and the shore was silted and impassable for ocean ships. But from the south the port is completely open. Even the sailing ships of the Europeans were maneuverable enough to stay out of the reach of the cannons of the fort.
    But the port did not have a harbor in which the fleet could be based.
    I’m not too lazy to even google a snapshot.
  4. 0
    4 March 2016 10: 21
    Thanks for the fortification. Not much, but at least something.
  5. 0
    4 March 2016 15: 49
    The article is good. It can be seen that the author studied and tried to delve into all the variety of products of the "homeland of elephants". Both weapons and fortifications. The Hindus are keen to invent the Kama Sutra, including in military matters. I was especially pleased that "the fire was kindled under the gate and no enemy could touch it" Uh-huh! In a besieged fortress, there is enough wood fuel for a long time to heat up a vertically standing gate with a height of about 3,5 meters to the temperature of redness of iron? Heat all day so that they can shine for half an hour in the darkness of the night. The siege is a long matter, why are they going to maintain the temperature for at least a day? You, sorry, did you heat a bad bath yourself in order to steam? And this is epic: "thorns on the gate so that the elephants do not break their foreheads" (c). As Sharikov said, "Elephant is a useful animal" (c). It costs money, how many grubs does it drain, while he is being brought up for 5 years, so that he can be in combat? And such a "abrams and armature" of those centuries to let on the spiked gates, so that they would scald it with burning tar and torment everything with arrows? Only the dumb ones are capable. The elephant will come in handy even in the battle on the plain. And the besieging guns did not have cannonballs at the gates instead of torturing animals? I will not list everything. Brightly, fantastically, like dancing "Hare Krishna, Hare rama!" (C). No offense to the author, you just need to apply economic and logical thinking to fairy tales!
    1. +2
      4 March 2016 20: 02
      This is a translation of the book of D.Nikol and no more ... all claims against him!
    2. +2
      4 March 2016 23: 13
      Quote: chelovektapok
      The article is good. It can be seen that the author studied and tried to delve into all the variety of products of the "homeland of elephants". Both weapons and fortifications. The Hindus are keen to invent the Kama Sutra, including in military matters.

      And the besieging guns did not have cannonballs at the gates instead of torturing animals? I will not list everything. Brightly, fantastically, like dancing "Hare Krishna, Hare rama!" (C). No offense to the author, you just need to apply economic and logical thinking to fairy tales!

      The gate was most likely covered by a shaft. Or some kind of design. Shields for example different. Our ancestors were far from fools.
      The spikes on the gate are more likely against rams, different logs ...
      See better how neatly made ancient weapons.
  6. 0
    4 March 2016 16: 01
    It’s funny that after the GREAT DOGS, MOGULISTAN was formed a little to the north,
    And the strange name of the animals appeared in the Kazakh language, although if they were never taken like that, animals were not found among the Kazakhs. This is a Maymyl monkey and at least elephant dust (saw), although I take douglat (dulat), which is some kind of genetic dislike for the inhabitants HINDUSTANA is laughing .
    1. 0
      4 March 2016 18: 14
      damn interesting, on a historical subject, managed to minus. I wanted to read the argument. laughing
  7. +3
    4 March 2016 16: 23
    The sea fort of Janjira. Was considered, and in fact was for centuries impregnable.
    Taken in the 15th century by Muslims (albeit by cunning - in the style of the Trojan War - under the guise of wine merchants), then in the 16th century by military art by Portuguese Christians. In general, the Portuguese, with their literally TINY forces, made such a rustle on all the "inaccessible" forts of India on the coast of Maharashtra that they managed to create a whole network of trading posts and their fortresses on their ruins.

    And once again I was surprised by the Indians (that to the Hindus, to the Muslims) - how much to be a non-sea people, incapable of war at sea, to try to take the island fort by means of undermining from the land !!! And so and not to take it !!!
    1. 0
      4 March 2016 16: 34
      Quote: Warrior2015
      Taken in the 15th century by Muslims (albeit by cunning - in the style of the Trojan War - under the guise of wine merchants), then in the 16th century by military art by Portuguese Christians. In general, the Portuguese, with their literally TINY forces, made such a rustle on all the "inaccessible" forts of India on the coast of Maharashtra that they managed to create a whole network of trading posts and their fortresses on their ruins.

      Now, the Chinese are quietly swearing at the expense of Macau, on the other hand, they, China, have money on the other, Asians are reckless !!! smile The most gamblers are the Chinese and Koreans.
      If you open official casinos in Blagoveshchensk or Vladik, such money will flow.
  8. 0
    4 March 2016 21: 29
    Dagger pichwa: side view.

    ... how can I grab it then?
    It was very visible that these Moguls were warlike.
    The sea fort of Janjira. Was considered, and in fact was for centuries impregnable.

    But Ushakov wasn’t nearby.
    in the famous fortress in Agra, which had three walls built by ledges.

    The most perfect fortifications were built according to the "star" typology.
    Everything new is well forgotten old, the author, if you are not in scrap, an article about ancient and more modern "fortresses-stars" in the world and Tartary)))
    1. +2
      4 March 2016 21: 37
      Well, if that was the case in Tartaria, then yes, of course ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. ICT
      +1
      5 March 2016 09: 30
      Quote: Gunter
      ... how can I grab it then?


      he is more ceremonial than combat

      and as asked above.

      Quote: Kostoprav
      And yes, how does the scourge blade hold? Do not see the stave - soldered?

      most likely riveted forging, as an option
  9. +2
    4 March 2016 23: 06
    Mortira was impressed. The culture of casting is felt
    . Great essay.