Chizhov: All Western accusations against Russian pilots are unproven

27
All accusations against the Russian military, allegedly inflicting air strikes on civilian targets in Syria, are unproven, reports RIA News Statement by the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the EU Vladimir Chizhov.



“No evidence was provided to back up the allegations that Russian air strikes were on any medical or educational institutions,” the diplomat told CNN.

Chizhov also noted that the Russian Federation in Syria is focused on the fight against terrorists, and not on competition with the West for influence in the Middle East region.

“Russia had no intention to compete with the West and fight for influence and certain positions in the region, the Russian Federation is focused on confronting an obvious threat - terrorism, which is primarily represented by the Islamic State terrorist group, as well as Dzhebhat al-Nusra and other organizations, ”he said.

According to the diplomat, “the primary task of Moscow is to ensure the security of Russia and prevent the infiltration of terrorists into the country’s territory”.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    26 February 2016 17: 49
    All very accurately said Chizhov, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye, well done.
    1. +5
      26 February 2016 17: 56
      When a flock of mongers bows a bear, it barks for members of the pack and does not bother about the correctness of the bark and its necessity. By doing this, they cheer themselves up on the wretched, appease the leader’s ears and provoke the patient to the head of a pack member (such as Turkey) to start a bicker! am
      1. +3
        26 February 2016 17: 59
        "Russia had no intentions to compete with the West and fight for influence and certain positions in the region, the Russian Federation is focused on confronting the obvious threat - terrorism ...".
        So it was in the beginning. Now it is more correct to formulate: "Russia had no intentions to compete with the West and fight for influence and certain positions in the region - but now it does. And we strengthen this influence and positions" by honest confrontation with this yig-chuma at the invitation of the legitimate government.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. KCA
        0
        27 February 2016 07: 29
        not everything is so simple ... a few huskies completely drive a bear, just barking and biting their paws and ass, well, what’s the bite of small mongoes compared to a bear, but in the end the bear just falls on the bitten ass and does not even get up the approach of hunters with guns, you must somehow fight the mongrel in advance, do not wait until small bites develop into pain in the ass
    2. +3
      26 February 2016 17: 56
      Vladimir Chizhov. Charismatic man! Look how serious ...
      1. +3
        26 February 2016 18: 01
        All allegations against the Russian military ... are unproven
        This phrase can be BAM or the Trans-Siberian Railway, in small print! As with our diplomats and others, regarding those, the language does not get tired !!! It’s clear what needs to be fixed.
        Vladimir Alekseevich, health to you and strong nerves! soldier
    3. 0
      26 February 2016 17: 56
      Quote: Giant thought
      All very accurately said Chizhov, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye, well done.

      He's certainly great. The worst thing is that no one IS GOING TO PROVE ANYTHING to anyone! The presumption of innocence DOES NOT WORK in politics. So one can blame Putin for all mortal sins - in the downed Malaysian Boeing, in the murder of Nemtsov, etc. It is not forbidden to chat in politics nowadays.
    4. +1
      26 February 2016 17: 57
      This only says one thing:
      The Russian Foreign Ministry is headed by a worthy statesman. His school wink
    5. +10
      26 February 2016 18: 00
      Quote: Giant thought
      All very accurately said Chizhov, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye, well done.

      Yes, and do not make excuses, we must continue to do our job and poke the nose of the same talkers into their own guano and is not shy about it.
    6. 0
      26 February 2016 20: 50
      Quote: Giant thought
      All very accurately said Chizhov, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye, well done.

      It seems that it could be said more clearly: " You're lying! ", leaving amers no room for maneuver
    7. +7
      27 February 2016 05: 13
      And the pilots will add to the crotch. They have already pulled up, "to answer for the market" gentlemen are not in a state
  2. 0
    26 February 2016 17: 50
    Churkin and Chizhov are not relatives?
    1. +1
      26 February 2016 17: 55
      Quote: Dimontius
      Churkin and Chizhov are not relatives?

      They are colleagues in misfortune because they work among inadequate Westerners. They need to give milk for harm.
    2. 0
      26 February 2016 18: 05
      Relatives. Both from Russia. smile
  3. +2
    26 February 2016 17: 51
    On that they and diplomats, without a mat, speak out about a clear blizzard.
    1. +2
      26 February 2016 18: 00
      A good attack of our diplomacy would always be so.
    2. +1
      26 February 2016 18: 01
      Quote: prostofily
      On that they and diplomats, without a mat, speak out about a clear blizzard.

      And I would formulate it in Russian. A week would be translated into accessible English! lol
  4. 0
    26 February 2016 17: 52
    Not one proof, but the stench above the roof, but how to bomb weddings and hospitals under a video camera, only "sorry" and silence. They don't see the logs in their own eyes and try to blacken us somehow, without facts, just unfounded.
  5. 0
    26 February 2016 17: 54
    Moderate barmaley got from TOU-2 on T-90.
    1. -1
      26 February 2016 18: 35
      Quote: Gray Brother
      Moderate barmaley got from TOU-2 on T-90.

      I assume that the tank was in a de-energized state. In this case, its active defense does not work, and the dynamic one is not able to protect against the tandem cumulative charge of an anti-tank missile.
      1. -1
        26 February 2016 19: 19
        Quote: Алексей_К
        and dynamic is not able to protect against the tandem cumulative charge of an anti-tank missile.

        Judging by the fact that the gunner knocked down there was no penetration.
  6. +2
    26 February 2016 17: 54
    It's time to call the West squabbling woman! As they say, if only to grind, if only the mouth would not shut! laughing
  7. 0
    26 February 2016 17: 55
    The identical twins.
  8. +1
    26 February 2016 17: 56
    Unproven attacks on Russia are a miserable lot for Ukrainians and the State Department that joined them.
  9. +1
    26 February 2016 18: 04
    “No evidence has been provided to support allegations that Russian airstrikes were at any medical or educational institution”
    Already how many all sorts of libel is roaming about Russian pilots. What is it for? It seems to me lately that this is wild, green envy. The vaunted advertised Amov airplanes were below average, and even lower, and unfamiliar Russian ones were an order of magnitude higher than them. That shtatovskih generals tear hair from all over, and come up with slander and fiction, simultaneously showing the stolen Russian videos and passing them off as their own.
  10. 0
    26 February 2016 18: 11
    They accuse them because they themselves constantly violate the airspace of Syria. Nobody invited them there, but they fly and bomb anyone they want. Therefore, Russia is to blame.
  11. bad
    +1
    26 February 2016 18: 24
    IMHO-no need to throw beads on each CNN vyser (damn rhyme laughing ) .. where is their evidence? ..
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 19: 03
      Do they need them?
  12. 0
    26 February 2016 19: 38
    It is necessary to water the west with its own slops, accuse him of fomenting war and helping terrorists. Beat these creatures with their own weapons, and our diplomats only hawala accusations and moo in response. Not solid somehow.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"