Military Review

Chizhov: All Western accusations against Russian pilots are unproven

27
All accusations against the Russian military, allegedly inflicting air strikes on civilian targets in Syria, are unproven, reports RIA News Statement by the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the EU Vladimir Chizhov.




“No evidence was provided to back up the allegations that Russian air strikes were on any medical or educational institutions,” the diplomat told CNN.

Chizhov also noted that the Russian Federation in Syria is focused on the fight against terrorists, and not on competition with the West for influence in the Middle East region.

“Russia had no intention to compete with the West and fight for influence and certain positions in the region, the Russian Federation is focused on confronting an obvious threat - terrorism, which is primarily represented by the Islamic State terrorist group, as well as Dzhebhat al-Nusra and other organizations, ”he said.

According to the diplomat, “the primary task of Moscow is to ensure the security of Russia and prevent the infiltration of terrorists into the country’s territory”.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Giant thought
    Giant thought 26 February 2016 17: 49
    +5
    All very accurately said Chizhov, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye, well done.
    1. Major Yurik
      Major Yurik 26 February 2016 17: 56
      +5
      When a flock of mongers bows a bear, it barks for members of the pack and does not bother about the correctness of the bark and its necessity. By doing this, they cheer themselves up on the wretched, appease the leader’s ears and provoke the patient to the head of a pack member (such as Turkey) to start a bicker! am
      1. Michael67
        Michael67 26 February 2016 17: 59
        +3
        "Russia had no intentions to compete with the West and fight for influence and certain positions in the region, the Russian Federation is focused on confronting the obvious threat - terrorism ...".
        So it was in the beginning. Now it is more correct to formulate: "Russia had no intentions to compete with the West and fight for influence and certain positions in the region - but now it does. And we strengthen this influence and positions" by honest confrontation with this yig-chuma at the invitation of the legitimate government.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. KCA
        KCA 27 February 2016 07: 29
        0
        not everything is so simple ... a few huskies completely drive a bear, just barking and biting their paws and ass, well, what’s the bite of small mongoes compared to a bear, but in the end the bear just falls on the bitten ass and does not even get up the approach of hunters with guns, you must somehow fight the mongrel in advance, do not wait until small bites develop into pain in the ass
    2. MASK
      MASK 26 February 2016 17: 56
      +3
      Vladimir Chizhov. Charismatic man! Look how serious ...
      1. Pravdarm
        Pravdarm 26 February 2016 18: 01
        +3
        All allegations against the Russian military ... are unproven
        This phrase can be BAM or the Trans-Siberian Railway, in small print! As with our diplomats and others, regarding those, the language does not get tired !!! It’s clear what needs to be fixed.
        Vladimir Alekseevich, health to you and strong nerves! soldier
    3. Proxima
      Proxima 26 February 2016 17: 56
      0
      Quote: Giant thought
      All very accurately said Chizhov, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye, well done.

      He's certainly great. The worst thing is that no one IS GOING TO PROVE ANYTHING to anyone! The presumption of innocence DOES NOT WORK in politics. So one can blame Putin for all mortal sins - in the downed Malaysian Boeing, in the murder of Nemtsov, etc. It is not forbidden to chat in politics nowadays.
    4. yuriy55
      yuriy55 26 February 2016 17: 57
      +1
      This only says one thing:
      The Russian Foreign Ministry is headed by a worthy statesman. His school wink
    5. 79807420129
      79807420129 26 February 2016 18: 00
      10
      Quote: Giant thought
      All very accurately said Chizhov, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye, well done.

      Yes, and do not make excuses, we must continue to do our job and poke the nose of the same talkers into their own guano and is not shy about it.
    6. Aleksander
      Aleksander 26 February 2016 20: 50
      0
      Quote: Giant thought
      All very accurately said Chizhov, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye, well done.

      It seems that it could be said more clearly: " You're lying! ", leaving amers no room for maneuver
    7. Pete mitchell
      Pete mitchell 27 February 2016 05: 13
      +7
      And the pilots will add to the crotch. They have already pulled up, "to answer for the market" gentlemen are not in a state
  2. Dimontius
    Dimontius 26 February 2016 17: 50
    0
    Churkin and Chizhov are not relatives?
    1. Primus pilus
      Primus pilus 26 February 2016 17: 55
      +1
      Quote: Dimontius
      Churkin and Chizhov are not relatives?

      They are colleagues in misfortune because they work among inadequate Westerners. They need to give milk for harm.
    2. novobranets
      novobranets 26 February 2016 18: 05
      0
      Relatives. Both from Russia. smile
  3. prostofily
    prostofily 26 February 2016 17: 51
    +2
    On that they and diplomats, without a mat, speak out about a clear blizzard.
    1. Penelope
      Penelope 26 February 2016 18: 00
      +2
      A good attack of our diplomacy would always be so.
    2. GSH-18
      GSH-18 26 February 2016 18: 01
      +1
      Quote: prostofily
      On that they and diplomats, without a mat, speak out about a clear blizzard.

      And I would formulate it in Russian. A week would be translated into accessible English! lol
  4. xam0
    xam0 26 February 2016 17: 52
    0
    Not one proof, but the stench above the roof, but how to bomb weddings and hospitals under a video camera, only "sorry" and silence. They don't see the logs in their own eyes and try to blacken us somehow, without facts, just unfounded.
  5. Gray brother
    Gray brother 26 February 2016 17: 54
    0
    Moderate barmaley got from TOU-2 on T-90.
    1. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 26 February 2016 18: 35
      -1
      Quote: Gray Brother
      Moderate barmaley got from TOU-2 on T-90.

      I assume that the tank was in a de-energized state. In this case, its active defense does not work, and the dynamic one is not able to protect against the tandem cumulative charge of an anti-tank missile.
      1. Gray brother
        Gray brother 26 February 2016 19: 19
        -1
        Quote: Алексей_К
        and dynamic is not able to protect against the tandem cumulative charge of an anti-tank missile.

        Judging by the fact that the gunner knocked down there was no penetration.
  6. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 26 February 2016 17: 54
    +2
    It's time to call the West squabbling woman! As they say, if only to grind, if only the mouth would not shut! laughing
  7. Anshe2
    Anshe2 26 February 2016 17: 55
    0
    The identical twins.
  8. atamankko
    atamankko 26 February 2016 17: 56
    +1
    Unproven attacks on Russia are a miserable lot for Ukrainians and the State Department that joined them.
  9. novobranets
    novobranets 26 February 2016 18: 04
    +1
    “No evidence has been provided to support allegations that Russian airstrikes were at any medical or educational institution”
    Already how many all sorts of libel is roaming about Russian pilots. What is it for? It seems to me lately that this is wild, green envy. The vaunted advertised Amov airplanes were below average, and even lower, and unfamiliar Russian ones were an order of magnitude higher than them. That shtatovskih generals tear hair from all over, and come up with slander and fiction, simultaneously showing the stolen Russian videos and passing them off as their own.
  10. Stinger
    Stinger 26 February 2016 18: 11
    0
    They accuse them because they themselves constantly violate the airspace of Syria. Nobody invited them there, but they fly and bomb anyone they want. Therefore, Russia is to blame.
  11. bad
    bad 26 February 2016 18: 24
    +1
    IMHO-no need to throw beads on each CNN vyser (damn rhyme laughing ) .. where is their evidence? ..
    1. Katman
      Katman 26 February 2016 19: 03
      0
      Do they need them?
  12. Redfox3k
    Redfox3k 26 February 2016 19: 38
    0
    It is necessary to water the west with its own slops, accuse him of fomenting war and helping terrorists. Beat these creatures with their own weapons, and our diplomats only hawala accusations and moo in response. Not solid somehow.