General: in case of war, Russia will face with all the power of NATO

224
In the event of hostilities, Russia will see the full power of NATO, the power of all the 28s in the organization’s organization, reports RIA News Statement by the Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), Joseph Dunford.



“If Russia faces NATO, it will face the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries that belong to it,”
Dunford said at a congressional hearing.

"The military exercises that the US is conducting in Europe are part of showing it," he added.

The head of the Pentagon, Carter, said at the same hearings that "the US intention to quadruple its assistance program to European allies (up to $ 3,4 billion) is a signal that the United States and NATO are ready to defend their territory."

“This is all the strength of the defense of the European allies,” he noted. “And we have plans for this,” said Carter.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

224 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +42
    26 February 2016 12: 28
    If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

    You are illiterate, general! Go read the story!
    1. +57
      26 February 2016 12: 31
      In the event of hostilities, Russia will see the full power of NATO, the power of all the 28 member states

      Russia was never the first to attack, but if NATO dares to attack Russia, then for the last time they will see fungi in the sky, let them not console themselves that we will not dare to use nuclear weapons
      1. GDP
        +66
        26 February 2016 12: 38
        Approximately 70% of NATO’s military power is the United States. So at least one USA, even 28 - the difference is small. The result will be one, in case of an unfavorable situation for us - the nuclear armageddon will cover everyone ...

        As Yeltsin said - "We also have heads" :)



        In Russia, at least there is room to move from the radioactive desert, Mother Siberia is big, and where will the surviving Europeans go to live? Will they accept Islam and go to Libya and Syria? They will be loved very much there and many times ...

        Europe, unlike Russia, is absolutely not prepared for a nuclear war, we have entire underground cities full of millions of tons of canned goods, felt boots, jerseys, Kalashnikovs and other vital things. We as a nation will survive, they will not ...
        1. +32
          26 February 2016 12: 40
          Russia will see the full power of NATO
          We saw these! laughing
          1. +28
            26 February 2016 12: 47
            Well, this is not an indicator. But the fact that the US strongest land grouping with enviable periodicity receives cabbage soup in Iraq and Afghanistan, that says a lot. And this enemy has no aircraft and a half-dead fleet of armored vehicles.
            1. +10
              26 February 2016 13: 16
              I recalled: the Chukchi Chinese declared war.
              The Chinese, yes, you're crazy! After all, we are billions !!!!
              Chukchi-yay, where are we going to bury you all .....
              But it’s hard to believe that these donkeys will snatch all as one piece. Indeed, one can easily rake in one’s teeth and how can states simply cease to exist, while popes will sit out over the seas ...
              1. +1
                26 February 2016 13: 39
                Quote: severniy
                while popes overseas will sit ...

                Dad will not sit out, they just irrevocably pass .....
              2. 0
                26 February 2016 16: 17
                ... US and NATO are ready to defend their territory "...

                ... yopt! From whom!? Only if from x "o" trash with priboltikami and from the "fifth column" ... Duc here you are, it’s your own fault, it’s not fucking to grow them ...
          2. +15
            26 February 2016 12: 49

            “If Russia faces NATO, it will face the full power of the alliance, all 28 member countries,” Dunford said at a congressional hearing.
            The main power in NATO is the United States, well, a couple more - three countries can do something. And the rest of the ballast and their protection will need to be diverted resources. And in general, something NATO officials are more and more often howling about aggressive Russia. Russia has become so insolent that it is already on the borders of NATO countries. wassat
            1. +10
              26 February 2016 13: 00
              The main power in NATO is the USA
              Hey Ameripeeds! And what about: "there it is, Mikhalych":
              1. +2
                26 February 2016 13: 15
                It is armed with an 30-mm built-in gun

                And shown on the OLS.
                The final price of F-35 rose

                But 200 was riveted. And the gun is shown instead of the 4-barrel - the 6-barrel.
                Somehow, advertising is more like American laudatory videos.
              2. +2
                26 February 2016 13: 20
                “US intention to quadruple its program of assistance to European allies (up to $ 3,4 billion) is a signal that the US
                will do the dirty work with the wrong hands. Europe is already filled to the eyeballs by immigrants from the Middle East, it remains to strike out and the same chaos as Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria will come in Europe.
              3. -2
                26 February 2016 13: 22
                Throw in hats.
                The four-barreled gun in the picture is six-barreled.
                You can’t be so clumsy
              4. +1
                26 February 2016 13: 29
                Even in the video about f35 it is said about a four-barreled cannon, and in the video there are 6 trunks ....
        2. +12
          26 February 2016 12: 51
          Quote: GDP
          As Yeltsin said - "We also have heads" :)

          It would be better if he had a head instead of a head on his shoulders at that time.
          1. GDP
            +10
            26 February 2016 12: 55
            It would be better if he had a head instead of a head on his shoulders at that time.

            That's for sure ... A bastard killed such a country ...
            1. +8
              26 February 2016 13: 06
              He finished off the country, and began to kill from the 85th.
              1. +2
                26 February 2016 16: 27
                "Perestroika and Acceleration, the Revolution Continues" is one of the most monumental works of Emesagorbachev ... as I remember what we have in school in social science brain zasi "rali, already sick ...
            2. 0
              26 February 2016 15: 43
              That's for sure ... A bastard killed such a country ...
              Fortunately, our country is so large and has such a margin of safety that EBN and the company did not have enough time to destroy everything (which pleases)
          2. +2
            26 February 2016 13: 06
            That's right, one should think not with the head between the legs, but with the head on the shoulders. They do not think that if they start a war, they themselves will meet with all the power of Russia and well-trained troops. fool
        3. 0
          26 February 2016 13: 17
          No one will survive. Even cockroaches, and not just in your head.
          :-)
        4. +3
          26 February 2016 13: 36
          Quote: GDP
          So at least one US, at least 28 - the difference is small. The result will be one

          yeah, I remember we had 28 Baku commissars, buried them in a civilian ..... we’ll do the same, all 28 ....... I am especially pleased with the military power of the Baltic states, Romanians, Czechs, Bulgarians, Germans and other husks .Kol they instead of protecting their women began to dress up in a skirt-type replace in the female field drinks
          1. +2
            26 February 2016 17: 46
            Quote: hert
            I remember we had 28 Baku commissars, they buried them in a civilian ..... we will do exactly the same, all 28 ...

            Actually, there were 26 of them ..
            And 28 is about Panfilov’s heroes. And this is History, it is desirable to write such things more precisely, and more objectively.
            1. 0
              26 February 2016 22: 12
              EG thing is dangerous.
            2. cap
              0
              27 February 2016 18: 49
              Quote: avia1991
              Quote: hert
              I remember we had 28 Baku commissars, they buried them in a civilian ..... we will do exactly the same, all 28 ...

              Actually, there were 26 of them ..
              And 28 is about Panfilov’s heroes. And this is History, it is desirable to write such things more precisely, and more objectively.


              And you didn’t have a chance to put the credit "for proletarian origin", I happened. The soldier was from a rigging platoon, a good soldier, but ... let's say, from the hinterland. There was no UGE then, but the difference between town and country was. .I had to work with the victims of education reform.
        5. 0
          26 February 2016 13: 42
          Quote: GDP
          Will they accept Islam and go to Libya and Syria? They will be loved very much there and many times ...

          They don’t get used to it ...
        6. +1
          26 February 2016 13: 44
          Quote: GDP
          Europe, unlike Russia, is absolutely not prepared for a nuclear war, we have entire underground cities full of millions of tons of canned goods, felt boots, jerseys, Kalashnikovs and other vital things. We as a nation will survive, they will not ...
          let them not console ourselves that we will not dare to use nuclear weapons

          In Europe, especially in the USA, few people know what nuclear war is. It is believed there that after a nuclear war, after serving some time in the bunker, you can go out and start living as usual. Well, it’s clear there, everyone knows what they teach in Western schools — homosexuality, tolerance (God forgive me), and so on. Western miracles. But I am extremely surprised by the reaction of members of the forum, whom I used to consider people to be literate and sober. All these preparations, food supplies and weapons, all this is nonsense. They can help in a natural disaster, but not in a war. Because there will be nowhere to go. Bunkers, this is only an extension of agony. Rising radioactive dust shields sunlight, air currents carry it all over the planet. The plants that need light for life will die first, then herbivores will die, having lost their nutrition, followed by predators. Nuclear winter, with a global drop in temperature across the planet, isotope poisoned air and soil. This is only one aspect. All living things who are lucky enough to survive after the attack are doomed. What relocation, what other clean places? Forget none of this will happen. 0,001% of survivors who die a slow painful death of people, that’s what will happen if a nuclear catastrophe erupts. Think about it the next time you are about to flaunt a nuclear club. hi
          Is it weak to argue minus?
          1. GDP
            +4
            26 February 2016 14: 46
            I did not minus, but still I will answer - The consequences of a massive nuclear strike are still unknown. The same nuclear winter is nothing more than a hypothesis.
            At one time, scientists said that after the use of a thermonuclear bomb with a power of several 10 megatons, a nuclear chain reaction would begin in the atmosphere - this did not happen.
            The world knew power strikes tens or even hundreds of times stronger than the combined nuclear stockpile of the USSR and the USA. Life went on, only a few species perished.
            The effects of nuclear armageddon are greatly exaggerated ...
            The action of nuclear bombs, even the largest ones, is quite local ...
            Yes, the consequences will be terrible, but this does not mean the death of civilization ...
            1. +1
              26 February 2016 15: 29
              However, the dinosaurs became extinct. And it seems precisely because of the cold snap on Earth. Cooling occurred due to the screening of sunlight by dust.
              1. GDP
                +2
                26 February 2016 16: 21
                The reason for the extinction of the dinosaurs was the fall of a huge body not far from the Yukatan Peninsula. The impact power was comparable with the simultaneous explosion of tens of thousands of nuclear bombs. The impact was global on the biosphere of the entire planet.
                the consequence is the extinction of large reptiles, including dinosaurs, but most of the species continued to live as if nothing had happened, and for warm-blooded dawn did come. The same dinosaurs lived millions of years after the disaster
                such a monstrous impact occurred as a result of the fact that the blow was concentrated in one place, which caused a huge emission of ash and dust.

                The nuclear weapons of mankind, even with massive use, are not able to achieve the same effect, and the strikes will not be concentrated, spread over large areas.

                If this happens, I think the climate will really change for the worse, but humanity will survive, and the war will continue ...
                Anyone who is better suited to harsh conditions and has a great will to win will win ...
              2. +2
                26 February 2016 16: 32
                ... this is just the law of evolution and a chain of random coincidences ... after all, after the disappearance of dinosaurs, life on Earth did not disappear and it is not known what else would have survived then ... maybe there would have been no one to argue with in the "Military Review" .. ... crying
            2. +2
              26 February 2016 16: 42
              A small example, it may not be the most successful, but ... August 26, 1883 there was an eruption of the volcano Krakatau. Shock waves 7 times walked around the Earth, created a 36-meter-high tsunami and a tidal wave, as a result of which the darkness of the people perished. This is only one volcano, not the largest. What will happen if countries with nuclear weapons begin to exchange blows? What do you think?
              The action of nuclear bombs, even the largest ones, is quite local ...
              I agree. Will it be possible to localize the consequences? I don’t think so. People have not yet learned how to control air flow and weather. What about tectonic shifts? To be honest, I don’t even want to think what will happen.
              1. +3
                26 February 2016 17: 56
                Quote: novobranets
                novobranets (3) Today, 16:42 ↑
                A small example, it may not be the most successful, but ... August 26, 1883 there was an eruption of the volcano Krakatau. The resulting shock waves circled the Earth 7 times, created a 36-meter-high tsunami and a tidal wave, which killed the darkness of the people. This is only one volcano, not the largest. What will happen if countries with nuclear weapons begin to exchange blows? What do you think?
                The action of nuclear bombs, even the largest ones, is quite local ... I agree. Will it be possible to localize the consequences? I don’t think so. People have not yet learned how to control air flow and weather. What about tectonic shifts? To be honest, I don’t even want to think what will happen.


                Most of the major cities in the Northern Hemisphere will be burned, all megacities of Russia and the USA destroyed, in Europe the same. If not all, then most. Perhaps, of course, other countries will be captured too --- China, Japan, Korea ... Will it be killed and maimed right away? Well, most likely a billion three to four. Africa and South America are not likely to be directly affected. There will be no nuclear winter as such, but the average temperature on the Earth will decrease by 2 - 3 degrees by 1,5 - 2 years. It will be quite tangible. The main scourge will of course be radiation. If 70% of the arsenals of nuclear powers are expended, what radiation background will there be on the planet? Surely there will be attacks on nuclear power plants. It doesn’t seem weak. Well, let it be, with a finger to the sky, right after the war, it will be an average of 1 R / H. Is it a lot or a little? How many people will be able to adapt to this background, and how many will die out? But for sure it will be only a few days. Then most likely it will fall once in a hundred or two hundred. However, the southern hemisphere will also suffer from radiation much less than the northern one. And in Antarctica, maybe this thermonuclear war will be practically invisible. Something like that most likely. And the volcano Krakatau had a very modest eruption, since everything is relative. 68 years before, in 1815 there was an eruption of the Tambor volcano in Indonesia, five times more powerful. And ash was thrown into the atmosphere about 100 km. cube And then in 1815 in Europe there was a year without summer --- in the summer in Europe it was cold rains and even streams froze. Most likely, a full-scale nuclear war, when most of the nuclear arsenals will be used, is comparable in catastrophe as if an asteroid with a diameter of three kilometers across at the time of the impact were being hit by the Earth. What speed does he have, 30 kilometers per second, no less. And what mass and what kinetic energy is released! And if he flies in the middle of some ocean, it will be more destructive than if it crashes into the land. At least 98% of the world's population will die and be crippled. People, rats are not so scared. Most likely, after such a war, mankind will recover to its pre-war state --- in terms of numbers, technology, and other development --- in at least two thousand years. With genetic mutations from radiation and other things. And what they will be, people then --- is unknown. And whether people will be at all, in principle, is also a question. A terrible thing is such a war, the mind is simply incomprehensible to the present pre-war.
            3. +3
              26 February 2016 17: 52
              Quote: GDP
              The world knew power strikes tens or even hundreds of times stronger than the combined nuclear stockpile of the USSR and the USA. Life went on, only a few species perished.
              The effects of nuclear armageddon are greatly exaggerated ...

              And nobody knows the consequences, nor skeptics - nor optimists! And thank God! Because your
              Quote: GDP
              the consequences will be terrible, but this does not mean the death of civilization ...
              - this is also "JUST A HYPOTHESIS" that Tavarischi like McCain and Brzezinski dream to "test in practice! And sober people prefer not to practice! Because Hiroshima and Nagasaki are just REALITY! And at the same time the consequences, despite the low power, Japan still feels!
              1. +3
                26 February 2016 18: 16
                Quote: avia1991
                Japan still feels!

                Radiation, in addition to destroying bone marrow, destroys DNA. Defective DNA becomes the cause of congenital severe, often incurable diseases, and malformations. Japan still faces this, and more often than I would like. That bombing in 1945 hit not only contemporaries, but also their offspring.
            4. 0
              26 February 2016 19: 34
              I agree with GDP

              The consequences of the nuclear conflict were greatly exaggerated - this was one of the arguments for detente. The USSR used to persuade opinions in the West in favor of reducing confrontation - so that the West does not press so hard

              But the West also used our dissidents with the same tale - to surrender everything to the West - to ruin the Union
      2. +7
        26 February 2016 12: 48
        Die like that with music! If such a war begins, it will be too late to look for winners.
      3. +18
        26 February 2016 12: 54
        Call the Yankees, but the experience of Russia suggests that when a "dog wedding" is attacked, the main thing is to bang the leading bitch, and the dogs will scatter almost immediately! America is fucking feminine, isn't it? stop
        1. GDP
          +2
          26 February 2016 13: 09
          If to bang, then it is necessary to bang all at once and Europe first. The Americans do not have a common border with us, but the European Union and Turkey are close by. If we confine ourselves to America alone, after mutual nuclear strikes, jackals from Europe will attack ...
          1. 0
            26 February 2016 13: 31
            If to bang, then it is necessary to bang all at once and Europe first. Americans don’t have a common border with us,
            and the Bering Strait? ..... Russia, of course, is a regional power, but its region is the whole world and the common border from America, Japan and China to Europe and Scandinavia wink
            1. +2
              26 February 2016 14: 32
              we will build a pontoon in one night laughing
          2. +5
            26 February 2016 19: 38
            Quote: GDP
            If to bang, then it is necessary to bang all at once and Europe first. The Americans do not have a common border with us, but the European Union and Turkey are close by. If we confine ourselves to America alone, after mutual nuclear strikes, jackals from Europe will attack ...


            Exactly

            I agree with the GDP again

            The US is isolated, but we are not here

            In the event of such a global conflict - if you exchange blows only with the United States - then there will be a super present for Europe, and for the same Turkey and Japan - no resistance - land in the Far East - capture the bomb - there is no army

            In order to protect the population of the Russian Federation and the Union republics in the event of such a disaster - in response you need to hit all the enemies around
        2. +2
          26 February 2016 13: 24
          One island must be drowned, and all will calm down
      4. +1
        26 February 2016 13: 04
        "... they will see fungi in the sky for the last time ..."
        "They" are more likely to be spores in these fungi.
      5. -13
        26 February 2016 13: 06
        Lock yourself in your basement and use nuclear weapons. Do not speak for everyone!
        1. GDP
          +4
          26 February 2016 13: 13
          And you think if the 3 world war begins, you will have a choice?
      6. 0
        26 February 2016 13: 15
        Nuclear weapons are needed only to deter the United States. Conventional conventional ammunition is sufficient for gay people.
        NATO without the USA is just paper troops! Even the armies of Germany and England are no longer the ones that were 20 years ago ..
      7. -1
        26 February 2016 13: 22
        let them not console ourselves that we will not dare to use nuclear weapons

        Press the button yourself? laughing
      8. 0
        26 February 2016 14: 09
        Quote: elmi
        Russia was never the first to attack

        Finns, Turks, Poles, Japanese, Swedes know this for sure. wink
        1. +2
          26 February 2016 16: 33
          ... Russia does not start a war, it usually ends them wink
          1. +1
            26 February 2016 16: 58
            Quote: 2C5
            ... Russia does not start a war, it usually ends them

            All lovers of beautiful myths would be nice to learn a story. Of course, like other powers, Russia sometimes attacked first, the reasons were different, but this happened.
        2. 0
          26 February 2016 17: 03
          Quote: Vladimirets
          I know about this for sure

          Strange, I do not see the Germans on the list.
          1. +1
            26 February 2016 17: 18
            Quote: Ros 56
            I do not see in the list of Germans.

            And when did we first attack the Germans?
      9. 0
        26 February 2016 17: 30
        let them not console ourselves that we will not dare to use nuclear weapons ........................................ ......................................
        .................................... Correctly drown one unnecessary island of arrogance and 50 years, these dermocrats will be. .to chuh and fart loudly.
    2. +15
      26 February 2016 12: 31
      Russia does not want war, it’s only the North Atlantic hawks who are trying to rekindle it, and if they rekindle it, they themselves will burn it.
      1. +7
        26 February 2016 12: 38
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Russia doesn’t want war, it’s only the North Atlantic hawks who are trying to kindle it

        The "North Atlantic hawks" represented by Luxembourg, Albania and the "Baltic tigers" are especially dangerous. Scary, already horror.
        NATO turns itself on with the "Russian threat" and then calms it down with declarations of its own steepness. However, in the event of a rapid military escalation, as long as the NATO member states comply with all bureaucratic procedures, the forward units of the RF Armed Forces will already be beyond the Pyrenees.
        1. +7
          26 February 2016 12: 55
          Quote: Ami du peuple
          NATO reassures itself.

          Exactly so and not otherwise. Last year, in the Netherlands, fighters were instructed to simulate firing firearms with a bang bang voice during a training exercise. The reason is the lack of ammunition. And what happens if all NATO troops start shouting loudly, "puff-puff"? Will I be scared? Will the diaper get dirty? The answer is NO! When I was growing up, nothing was known about diapers, and now I don't wear them. Unlike NATO warriors.
          1. +2
            26 February 2016 14: 25
            And you can "scare" me with a NATO psychic attack, only in a thong.
            1. +2
              26 February 2016 16: 46
              laughing
      2. +13
        26 February 2016 12: 42
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Russia does not want war, it’s only the North Atlantic hawks who are trying to rekindle it, and if they rekindle it, they themselves will burn it.

        Probably Russia should say to the whole world: do not touch Russia, because it will be sad for you! There is plenty of arsenal, not only for the 28 NATO members, but also for everyone else who opens their mouth on Russia's wealth!
      3. +2
        26 February 2016 13: 24
        and if they light it, they themselves will burn it.

        Cucumbers and tomatoes no longer get off? wassat
    3. +19
      26 February 2016 12: 37
      I do not remember that Russian specialists allowed themselves statements about destruction, about power, aggression. . . why do they think that they show the height of their culture and principles of etiquette when they say so. . . degradation and degradation again. And they own nuclear weapons.
      1. +3
        26 February 2016 12: 42
        why do they think that they show the height of their culture and principles of etiquette when they say so

        Because they are Anglo-Saxons, elected, the best of the best nations in the world, and so on and so forth ...
        Well, they think so. It is not clear why the truth.
        1. +8
          26 February 2016 12: 47
          Scare, then they themselves are scared to hell.
        2. 0
          26 February 2016 13: 26
          But what about the Jews?
      2. 0
        26 February 2016 14: 21
        Political boorish.
    4. +2
      26 February 2016 12: 48
      Quote: Tatar 174
      If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

      Who the hell are you for, just don’t jerk yourself first and everything will be tip-top. soldier
    5. +12
      26 February 2016 12: 54
      “US military exercises in Europe are part of showing this

      We showed, we laughed. We showed our NATO exercises crap.
    6. +1
      26 February 2016 12: 56
      He who comes to us with a sword will die from him!
    7. +1
      26 February 2016 12: 59
      whoever comes to us with a sword will die from him!
    8. 0
      26 February 2016 12: 59
      whoever comes to us with a sword will die from him!
    9. +5
      26 February 2016 12: 59
      Quote: Tatar 174
      If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

      And we hamsters have heaven, with all their might,
      Fight? Well, it’s necessary.
    10. -22
      26 February 2016 13: 04
      He is a Tatar Tatar! Russia has never reached such idiocy to quarrel with the whole world. With its economic weakness and tiny, compared with 28 NATO countries, a population dispersed over vast expanses, it is easy prey. The only thing that holds back the rational environment is the inadequate swinging of nuclear weapons by Russia.
      1. +7
        26 February 2016 13: 10
        Quote: ban1410
        The only thing that restrains a reasonable environment is the inadequate swing of nuclear weapons by Russia

        The only thing that holds back obscene words addressed to you is the threat of a ban from the moderators. "Inadequate swinging", damn it .. Go, wave your cock, "reasonable". Although I deeply doubt that you were taught in childhood, after the process of urination, shake off this organ. So you go in shabby trousers.
      2. +4
        26 February 2016 13: 27
        He is a Tatar Tatar!
        ----------------------------------
        Here I "love" such commentators such as a ban. If only to fart. First, read the commentary, do not be lazy, you might understand that the person quoted from the article, and then commented, and in a completely different way.
        And then, where does nationality, my friend? even if his opinion didn’t coincide with yours?
      3. +1
        26 February 2016 14: 14
        Quote: ban1410
        inadequate waving of nuclear weapons by Russia.

        In a modern environment, it’s just adequate. Yes
      4. +1
        26 February 2016 14: 14
        Filter the bazaar!
      5. +1
        26 February 2016 16: 39
        ... like "millions of beggars with a nuclear club"? Well, you have had enough! And who and when, not counting N.S. Khrushchev, was waving this very club inadequately, eh? You, the prosecutor not with the CENSOR, did you accidentally wander here? Judging by the color of the shoulder straps, yes ... well, you wandered around and sit in your corner and do not fart, do not expose your senile vices and lack of brain activity ... negative
      6. +1
        26 February 2016 17: 08
        Quote: ban1410
        inadequate waving of nuclear weapons by Russia.


        Can you give an example when Russia brandished a nuclear weapon, with evidence?
    11. +5
      26 February 2016 13: 07
      Quote: Tartar 174

      You are illiterate, general! Go read the story!

      Anecdote in the topic:
      The NATO plans to attack Russia went for historical experience-
      Ask the French when to attack? - Not only not in winter, Napoleon attacked - he froze and lost.
      They ask the Turks - not only didn’t we have a war in the summer and tore at sea and on land ....
      They ask the Germans - only not in the fall - the tanks in the swamp will not be able to drown;
      Ask the Chinese - Well, when? - Now attack them a lot of problems and the Power of Siberia and roads with bridges in the Crimea and industry need to be raised ..... They really need prisoners
    12. Tor5
      +1
      26 February 2016 13: 14
      With the saints behind the grave - this general.
    13. +1
      26 February 2016 13: 30
      Quote: Tatar 174
      If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

      An interesting statement of the question is, someone wants to become part of RUSSIA ..... Sweden, Finland, Poland already were, probably they liked it. And all you need to do is to recall the storerooms and form 3-5 new operational brigades of military commanders to maintain order
    14. +6
      26 February 2016 13: 40
      ... for the day of February 25, 2016, the second AMERICAN general speaks for Europe ... HOWEVER !!! laughing
      1. +1
        26 February 2016 16: 43
        ... he doesn’t speak, but just harnesses just in case ... if America as a state and as a continent has a small cord to arrange where they begin to move interestingly? Underground In the EU created by them, in Africa and BV? It seems as though they are not very happy everywhere ... if I am not mistaken. Well, only if underground lol
    15. +1
      26 February 2016 13: 53
      .... only with those that will not manage in advance. I think, apart from the Yusovites and Poland themselves, no one will want to fight with the Russian Federation.
    16. +1
      26 February 2016 14: 02
      An adult is like a man. This general. And he thinks that he is 41 years old. If he already collides. So all poplars and ash and yars will fly to these 28 countries. As if Russia will play shoot-id ... from it forever !!!!
    17. +1
      26 February 2016 14: 39
      Quote: Tatar 174
      Illiterate you general

      Quote: GDP
      at least one USA, at least 28 - the difference is small. The result will be one, in case of an unfavorable situation for us - the nuclear armageddon will cover everyone ...

      That is why it is not even necessary to mumble about the war with the Russian Federation. Danger to everyone.
      Turak, and also the General Staff! laughing
      1. +1
        26 February 2016 16: 37
        The perimeter is called.
      2. +1
        26 February 2016 16: 46
        ... they are there in all the headquarters and the State Departments stupid until retirement in black ... but when "exs" become here they are cut through in life! Kulef, they drove away from the trough, so there is nothing to lose, you can smell wink
    18. +1
      26 February 2016 14: 48
      for Russia to clash with NATO, it needs to move towards that NATO. in the meantime, only NATO is moving towards Russia. so who will run into anyone is another open question angry
    19. +1
      26 February 2016 17: 07
      You are illiterate, general! Go read the story!

      About NATO

      "And you friends, how do not sit down
      You're not good enough for musicians "- grandfather Krylov ...
    20. +1
      26 February 2016 18: 14
      If Russia faces all the power of NATO, then .... we have to give up, the generals are worried!
  2. +19
    26 February 2016 12: 29
    Yes, go ahead. A drum on the neck, a feather in w_pu.

    Although I doubt it, to be honest. Most will have different urgent matters.
    1. +15
      26 February 2016 12: 50
      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/172/lqwg742.png

      wassat laughing
      1. +2
        26 February 2016 14: 52
        This is kicked out of the White House this year on a bench.
  3. +16
    26 February 2016 12: 30
    Excuse me, will Estonia participate? If so, we will give up!
    1. +8
      26 February 2016 12: 33
      I can not agree! EEEE Estonia is serious! Even the submarine ski cavalry from Buryatia will not help us
  4. +14
    26 February 2016 12: 32
    This Kentucky gondola painstakingly scares a hedgehog with a bare ass. We never forgot that the goblet of the European gopota again gathered at our borders. Again, get the hare. Nothing new, everything is as usual.
    1. +11
      26 February 2016 12: 49
      Quote: gergi
      This Kentucky gondola painstakingly scares a hedgehog with a bare ass. We never forgot that the goblet of the European gopota again gathered at our borders. Again, get the hare. Nothing new, everything is as usual.

      Not very politically correct, but the idea is accurate!
    2. +2
      26 February 2016 14: 10
      Well, why so sharply, just a used condom with a bare booty.
    3. +1
      26 February 2016 14: 12
      Yes, this gopota does not disappear anywhere. Everything at our borders is rubbing .... for several centuries ... shaka.ly.
  5. +14
    26 February 2016 12: 32
    Yeah. POWER. POWER even.
    The Baltic states with the Bulgarians, the Bosnians with the Liechtensteinites will stand together, and even Monaco and San Marino will put out their innumerable divisions to defend Europe.
    Someone remind Comrade NATO General that the Bundeswehr’s most powerful European army has less than 300 tanks, of which not all are on track; the English ground army is only 4 (four) divisions; Italians will rather fight for us than against; France has not decided whether it is a full member of NATO.
    All hope of NATO, apparently, to Belgium, Liechtenstein and Slovakia. And joined Albania.
    1. +3
      26 February 2016 13: 13
      San Marino will help with the supply of Lambrusca! :)
  6. +5
    26 February 2016 12: 32
    Well, I'm sure that half will fall off immediately))))
    1. +7
      26 February 2016 12: 50
      Quote: salat
      Well, I'm sure that half will fall off immediately))))

      Especially those where there are radars and missile defense!
  7. +4
    26 February 2016 12: 33
    I think that this general and almost everyone will not see either power or weakness, everyone will be kirdyk. And the aliens will see fragments of the ball. request
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 16: 31
      Well, this is perhaps
      search, the ball will not care.
  8. +12
    26 February 2016 12: 33
    Twice Europe gathered in a crowd to Russia for pi ... mi, it will receive a third time, they don’t teach history at all
    1. +6
      26 February 2016 12: 47
      So the pin.dosy did not participate, therefore they believe that it will be easier than in Afghanistan and Iraq. There they "won" with a bang.
      1. +1
        26 February 2016 16: 30
        Russia is not Afghanistan, it will be larger.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +4
      26 February 2016 13: 00
      Quote: plotnikov561956
      Twice Europe gathered in a crowd to Russia for pi ... mi, it will receive a third time, they don’t teach history at all

      This time, it will not be Geyropa, but the SGA! And to the fullest! Pseudo - the country that created the Pyramid (Mavrodi is resting) will collapse anyway. How long do you pull off the skin, but it won't get longer and bigger! And these creatures will try once again to provoke the whole world to a new war!
  9. +6
    26 February 2016 12: 34
    There were many of you ... Always the West lied and started wars with Russia, such eternal dirty tricks. And always got nuts! Once again, the intimidation attempt reminds a monkey that throws itself at a tiger from a tree. She is scared, but she is a hero in front of other monkeys !
  10. VP
    +4
    26 February 2016 12: 34
    Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania - these are already three countries that will collapse with all their might. If Luxembourg, Albania and Iceland join them, they will simply bury us.
    1. +6
      26 February 2016 13: 00
      Quote: VP
      Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania - these are already three countries that will collapse with all their might. If Luxembourg, Albania and Iceland join them, they will simply bury us.

      Poland, Poland forgot! laughing
  11. +6
    26 February 2016 12: 35
    Enlighten me, only the Syrian VKS group equals the power of how many states (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, etc.) NATO?
  12. +6
    26 February 2016 12: 35
    Seriously? The main power of the alliance is the armies and navy of the United States, Britain, France and Germany. The rest is nothing more than a consumable that will be put ahead for slaughter. In order for us to use up more ammunition.
    But the fact that the US is deploying nuclear bombs in Europe and bringing planes to some NATO countries to equip them with these bombs is suspicious. A single F-16, flown where it is necessary with this bomb, will be a very, very unpleasant target - to shoot down or not to shoot down?
    1. +1
      26 February 2016 16: 26
      It will be exposed to electronic warfare, it will fall and do not need to be shot down.
  13. +3
    26 February 2016 12: 35
    What the Americans find hard to refuse is the ability to make presentations out of the blue. NATO!!! The packaging is beautiful, the promises are sweet. But as far as matters are concerned, everything is very restrained, or even generally withdrawn. We have seen this many times, but there are still "Pinocchio" in the world carrying 5 soldo to a famous country.
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 16: 24
      The last time they refused to support their Turkey, against Russia.
  14. +4
    26 February 2016 12: 35
    And we already faced. In 1941 Results recall?
  15. +3
    26 February 2016 12: 36
    Are these generals not afraid to feel the full power of the Russian Army on their bodies? - Probably, "if something happens", they will "fly, get dressed and rejoice"!
  16. +22
    26 February 2016 12: 36
    Announce the entire list ..... please
    1. +10
      26 February 2016 12: 50
      Announce the entire list ..... please
      that's who fought against the USSR
      Here is a curious archival document - a list of prisoners of war who surrendered to Soviet troops during the war. Recall, a prisoner of war is one who fights in uniform with weapons in his hands.
      So,
      Germans - 2 389 560,
      Hungarians - 513 767,
      Romanians - 187 370,
      Austrians - 156 682,
      Czechs and Slovaks - 69 977,
      Poles - 60,
      Italians - 48 957,
      the French - 23,
      Croats - 21 822,
      Moldavians - 14 129,
      Jews - 10 173,
      the Dutch - 4,
      Finns - 2 377,
      Belgians - 2 010,
      Luxembourgers - 1652,
      Danes - 457,
      Spaniards - 452,
      gypsies - 383,
      Norwegians - 101,
      Swedes - 72.
      but even here not all are listed, so there is experience in battles against "all" Europe.
      1. 0
        26 February 2016 14: 03
        And some freaks from the list were not even taken prisoner.
  17. +5
    26 February 2016 12: 37
    Frightened ... With such power, they really throw us hats. With indecent name. smile
    1. +1
      26 February 2016 13: 02
      Quote: Stroibat stock
      . With such power, they really throw us hats.

      Caps are unlikely, because half of the NATO army in blue handkerchiefs cut. laughing
  18. +7
    26 February 2016 12: 37
    General: in case of war, Russia will face with all the power of NATO
    Grand conclusion! Well, and NATO - with all the power of Russia. Does the general rave about this dream?
    Well then, let him look at least at EU unity in solving problems with migrants.
  19. +7
    26 February 2016 12: 41
    What a warlike generality for mattresses)))
    And they do not even allow other options, except for wars in Europe and Russia. It must be understood that in the event of hostilities, mattresses are not guaranteed a quiet stay behind a large puddle and they will be among the first to be distributed
  20. +5
    26 February 2016 12: 42
    That's right with all the power !!! And all Russian bear will be defeated !! It is simply called: n ..... t and does not blush !! it’s necessary to maintain sprats in their centuries-old pain from the Russian state! The realities are different and he knows them very well! All the same, NATO’s analytics are still functioning! Although if you look closely at the NATO army, then such contradictions will emerge that the general will become bad !!!
  21. +5
    26 February 2016 12: 45
    FT: NATO experts criticized alliance fighting efficiency
    07: 1626.02.2016 (updated: 12: 04 26.02.2016) 728483171
    The armed forces of a number of key members of the organization are harmed by a lack of funding, troops suffer from an acute shortage of working equipment, the authors of the study note.


    RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/world/20160226/1380610623.html#ixzz41GWpcqls
    Decide already, the power of NATO or weakness ...
  22. +4
    26 February 2016 12: 45
    look at the map - the sixth part of sushi. and Pearly more than once throughout Europe
  23. +9
    26 February 2016 12: 46
    With this "power"? wassat
    1. +1
      26 February 2016 13: 59
      In, another fucking ... dusty bag.
    2. 0
      26 February 2016 14: 02
      Who was staring at?
    3. +2
      26 February 2016 17: 27
      Quote: SoboL
      With this "power"?

      The warrior must inspire fear; the same will bring terrible laughter.
  24. 0
    26 February 2016 12: 47
    On this occasion, everything has been said in Munich by the representative of the Russian Federation.
  25. +4
    26 February 2016 12: 48
    The pedicots scream again! laughing
  26. +3
    26 February 2016 12: 50
    And somewhere to bury them all, got their howl!
  27. -2
    26 February 2016 12: 50
    The question is who will fight and for what?
    If for 92 mrd. greens that the Central Bank placed in US bonds, for Miller, Rottenberg, Matvienko and others ...
    WILL NOT GO!!
    PS Mixed with shit Donbass, crippled the fate of people of the whole region and betrayed oblivion!
    Now we have only reports about the blitz krieg in Syria, the hypocrisy of those holding power is over the top!
    1. +4
      26 February 2016 13: 45
      will you sit under your skirt? GREAT MEN'S ACTION.
    2. +5
      26 February 2016 13: 54
      The question is who will fight and for what?
      for Russia, brother. In World War II, too, they did not fight for the Jewish Bolsheviks
      1. +2
        26 February 2016 14: 59
        Yes, and there’s no need to fight, the war will end within 1 hour - but all who survive will be engaged in construction, analysis of rubble and cleaning up the country's territory from radioactive fallout.
    3. +2
      26 February 2016 15: 11
      Quote: Vad65
      The question is who will fight and for what?

      Take away the flag of Russia, darned. negative
    4. +1
      28 February 2016 06: 01
      Well, I'm for the house and relatives. Do you remember the oath? there is nothing about greenery and the central bank
    5. The comment was deleted.
  28. +4
    26 February 2016 12: 50
    Pendos call themselves a “cultural” nation, and behave like that drunkard who sees and understands that he can’t deal with a sober oncoming person. He starts to fidget and wave his hands, hinting that he is as cool as a boiled ostrich egg and what the hell he was not harassed and made no comments on uncultured behavior in society.
  29. +4
    26 February 2016 12: 50
    Quote: Tatar 174
    If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.


    NATO has a thin gut to fight to the fullest with us, they can only bomb the natives, in Europe there are almost no men and women transgender people left alone, they (NATO) are not able to fight until the last, just a darling is not enough
  30. +4
    26 February 2016 12: 50
    Wow, the general scared. Interesting: he himself did not put in his pants from his words? And d and about whom I decided to take on the "show-off", we are already scared scared. But with regard to the states, this is another question, will they be present on the world map or not! negative
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 16: 18
      They will not, the volcano will try.
  31. +7
    26 February 2016 12: 51
    Our people can scold the government, the president, the neighbor, but if anyone gets on Russia, then he will scrape it off from all sides. Look at these faces! They do not even imagine what awaits them. if they turn up! Lavrov correctly said .. DB.
  32. +4
    26 February 2016 12: 54
    Generals became balabol as politicians. Just yesterday, he complained that NATO might not cope with Russia. He cited many shortcomings in NATO's combat readiness, and in particular, one example: in Germany, out of 39
    helicopter gunships, only 10 are in readiness.
  33. +1
    26 February 2016 12: 55
    Throughout history, this fucking alliance has been fighting against Russia, only the names and their commanders are changing am
  34. +6
    26 February 2016 12: 58
    If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

    1.Belgium
    2.The Great Britain
    3.Day
    4.Italy
    5.Iceland
    6.Canada
    7.Lüksembourg
    8Netherlands
    9.Norway
    10.Portugal
    11.US
    12.France
    13.Gretia
    14.Turkey
    15.Germany
    16.Spain
    17Vengriya
    18.Poland
    19.Czech Republic
    20.Bulgaria
    21.Latvia
    22.Latva
    23.Rumnia
    24.Links
    25.Sloves
    26.Estonia
    27.Albania
    28.Croatia

    And who is the power here?
    1. +1
      26 February 2016 13: 02
      Well, most likely Luxembourg and "pribludy". Here is Nata's main power lol
    2. 0
      26 February 2016 15: 01
      Ukraine has been forgotten - it is almost in NATA by "POWER".
  35. 0
    26 February 2016 12: 59
    “And we have plans for this”

    A general without a plan is not a general. But to what extent are people lean - they have eaten mustard felts, they don’t like plans.
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 13: 56
      These are not faces, but physiognomies asking for a brick.
    2. 0
      26 February 2016 16: 16
      These are the plans and light, so as not to be scared.
  36. +1
    26 February 2016 13: 01
    It is possible that the peace plan for the Syrian settlement violated the plans of some concerned departments in the states and not only. And immediately there was a murmur and groaning, bordering on extravagance. Zakharova aptly nailed him with an "anecdote". And we need to take into account the power of NATA, not to give the opportunity to plan their scenario. As it happens.
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 16: 14
      They are well done against the sheep, and against the good, the sheep themselves.
  37. +4
    26 February 2016 13: 01
    And you do not scare, you bastard. Hitler in his time already fucked
  38. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 02
    ... and after that, 26 countries "run out of gas", one will grow a nuclear mushroom, and the remaining power of one, the largest country of the alliance, will scatter when the hamburgers in the sunken supply ships go out! ))))
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 16: 13
      When the volcano wakes up.
  39. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 04
    they will be thrown out with nuclear caps to us. hi
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 16: 12
      Even if the Russian command is destroyed, the perimeter itself, without a command, will work on the goals entered.
  40. +1
    26 February 2016 13: 04
    They’re all scaring, scaring, they won’t calm down in any way! It seems that they do it
    in order to frighten themselves and their population more, well, and to get more money
    in satellite countries and in congress.
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 16: 10
      They scream out of fear.
  41. +2
    26 February 2016 13: 04
    “If all the power of the alliance, all the countries included in it is 28”, encounters Russia, it will encounter the problem of mass organization of mass graves.
    Ukraine has already prepared ditches, it can help.
  42. +2
    26 February 2016 13: 05
    Well, what else can they say? What can only with the help of US troops NATO be able to defend the Lamanche, giving up the entire territory in a few weeks? The people will rightfully be outraged - and then why? So cheeks are inflated with all their might!
  43. +4
    26 February 2016 13: 07
    We joke in vain - the United States and its allies are stupidly more, they are armed no worse than the Russian army (it is clear that not all of them). In addition to the armies of NATO allies, there will also be a lot of volunteers from there. In addition, the United States and its allies (albeit not all of them) have a powerful economy, advanced industry and science. Without our nuclear arsenal, the "Jedi" would have long ago come to us under any pretext (or even without it). They are very tempted to wipe Russia off the face of the Earth. For the sake of such a goal, they would not only sacrifice the Estonian-Romanian-Poles, but would also kill their own in any quantity. In the Citadel of Liberty, this is called "acceptable loss".
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 14: 14
      Do not forget that if something happens the first blow will be on "a powerful economy, advanced industry and science."
    2. 0
      26 February 2016 14: 16
      Duck, nuclear potency is not for the mind.
    3. 0
      26 February 2016 16: 07
      One nuclear strike on a volcano and no USA. The rest themselves will resort to lick the ass of Russia. Read about the perimeter.
      1. +1
        26 February 2016 16: 09
        Quote: cergey51046
        One nuclear strike on a volcano and no USA. The rest themselves will resort to lick the ass of Russia. Read about the perimeter.

        Wow, the beloved Uryakal volcano has not been remembered for a long time)))))))) We will throw their caps and put cotton wool on it and that's all)))
  44. +2
    26 February 2016 13: 07
    The Hollywood film industry has done its job, no memory or brains of these generals, Avatar and more. request
  45. +1
    26 February 2016 13: 09
    Just mattresses have not raked for a long time. Feeling of dullness. And more ... Hide behind the alliance is a manifestation of cowardice
  46. +1
    26 February 2016 13: 09
    If you change the power of weakness, then the title of the article will be correct. smile
  47. +2
    26 February 2016 13: 09
    Quote: sabakina
    If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

    1.Belgium
    2.The Great Britain
    3.Day
    4.Italy
    5.Iceland
    6.Canada
    7.Lüksembourg
    8Netherlands
    9.Norway
    10.Portugal
    11.US
    12.France
    13.Gretia
    14.Turkey
    15.Germany
    16.Spain
    17Vengriya
    18.Poland
    19.Czech Republic
    20.Bulgaria
    21.Latvia
    22.Latva
    23.Rumnia
    24.Links
    25.Sloves
    26.Estonia
    27.Albania
    28.Croatia

    And who is the power here?

    Well, who? "Baltic Tigers", Romanians, Luxembourg, Iceland. But the most fierce of all NATA are, of course, the Albanians!
    1. Riv
      +1
      26 February 2016 13: 49
      The coolest Luxembourg construction battalion ...
    2. +1
      26 February 2016 13: 49
      List of political prostitutes.
    3. 0
      26 February 2016 14: 00
      I remember there is an old film - "300 Albanians"))
  48. +1
    26 February 2016 13: 10
    In the event of hostilities, Russia will see the full power of NATO, the power of all the 28 member states
    The feeling is strange, like that (stupid person) who sees a rake, has already raised his foot to step on them, while he himself has done this several times before, but still, like a mantra, he repeats to himself, yes, but now it will be a little painful, otherwise you look and the rake will break, that's when !!! "Then" - it won't! There will be rakes, either with a proven birch handle, or all-metal - forged!
  49. +3
    26 February 2016 13: 10
    Well, yes, you are 28 ... And we are the army! Where are we going to bury 28 NATO members? Russia has always fought with superior forces, with all of Europe. So what?
  50. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 11
    The statement from the category "A good show is more expensive than money", however, did not pass. Although it may have slipped into NATO ...
  51. +2
    26 February 2016 13: 12
    He wanted to say "Power"!
    And how long will we have to wait until NATO gathers all its “POWER”? HALF a year? Year?
  52. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 14
    Well, yes, of course, in NATO the warrior countries “Horde” - so what? Even though we are alone, yes “We are the Soldier”... drinks
  53. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 14
    Guys, you are missing an important number, 28.
    28, Karl, 28....
    Pamfilovtsev, but at least they were our guys. They fell down, but survived.
    Symbolic, right?
    28 NATO members will also die. All. But they will defend it. Someone...I can even guess who... wassat
    ...
    True, this time the story will end differently than in 1941. Then there was no Yellowstone crater near Moscow.
    Well, Captain America doesn't care about such little things.
    ...
    Someone here said - “..who will come to Rus' with a sword...” and I’ll immediately add from myself - “he is far behind in the arms race!"
    ...
    And now this is becoming very relevant.
    ...
    Whoever comes to Rus' with a sword is far behind in the arms race!
    ...
    Whoever comes with a club will hobble away with it - in the ass!
  54. +4
    26 February 2016 13: 19

    Are these warriors?
  55. +2
    26 February 2016 13: 21
    We need counterarguments. For example, if Turkey starts a military conflict with Russia, the Baltic states will automatically get hit in the face. There is no common border with Turkey yet, but there is one with them. Alliance member? Get it for your comrades. Or something like that. The meaning must be thoroughly implanted in the heads of Western ordinary people that all these bravura speeches of Western politicians and military officers will lead to big troubles for the ordinary ass. And you don't need to be too correct. Morons always mistake politeness for weakness, and a thin physique for weakness, as my friend said, knocking out another jock.
  56. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 23
    When...

    cases... are different
  57. +1
    26 February 2016 13: 24
    The general did not understand that the war between Russia and NATO would be the last war for all humanity...
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 17: 37
      A nuclear war will not be the last for all humanity - other countries will reap the benefits of this war and survive.
  58. +1
    26 February 2016 13: 26
    Gentlemen, you have forgotten our neighbor Ukraine. The United States has great hopes for the cannon fodder of the rebellious "hokland". It seems that it was with their hands and lives that they decided to resist “Russian aggression.” They will force you to work off your independence. Moreover, there is a reason: Crimea, Dombass. After all, the West itself is not capable of action, only these Maidan "CAINS" are ready to crawl out of their skin and bludgeon their brothers.
  59. In case of war, Russia will face the full might of NATO


    It is NATO that, in the event of war, will face the full power of Russia
  60. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 33
    NATO has long been no longer a military bloc, but a commercial project. You could even say "elusive Joe".
    In general, it’s time to release a manual for foreign presidents and the like, containing information about what happened to those who fought with Russia. Give to everyone against receipt.
  61. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 36
    and what does it sound like: “THE POWER OF 28 COUNTRIES...” Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Albania, Belgium, Denmark, Portugal... My legs gave way. I can't write anymore out of fear...
  62. +1
    26 February 2016 13: 38
    The stupid American illiterate general is trying to show off! In case of war there will be no America! Well, how long can America withstand megaton charges on its territory or are they thinking of sitting overseas, naive! For the smart ones, it has long been stated that 50% of the charges are in America, and the rest are in all NATO military bases! I hope there are still smart generals in America!
  63. +2
    26 February 2016 13: 40
    with all 28? and all powerful? Why are the Baltic states powerful? with your great and terrible river inflatable fleet? have you noticed a trend? While these generals are in the ranks, they spout such nonsense, and when they retire, they say completely different things.

    Norway will attack geographical ships with ouds and fishermen.. Romanians on chariots with gypsies, Lithuania... Latvia.. oh my God!? Iceland?! and here is their invincible army (Coast Guard: 130 people, three patrol ships, one patrol boat, one DHC-8-300 MSA aircraft and three helicopters (one Eurocopter AS365N “Dauphin 2” and two AS-332L1 “Super Puma”) ...

    so what do we have next...Estonia...Croatia.....a herd of hamsters that are absolutely dead. USA-Turkey-France-England....everything...the same company that has been around for a hundred and two hundred years back. Don't get used to it.
  64. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 42
    I remembered an old joke:
    In the middle of the Pacific Ocean pops up a Russian submarine, rusty, all in shells. An unwashed, dirty, and so on team is forming on the deck. The commander:
    - Who threw a felt boot into the remote? Everyone is silent.
    - Who threw a felt boot into the console? An American submarine emerges nearby, everything is sparkling, their captain is building his crew. The Americans are in a brand new uniform, in short, "made in America." The American commander brushes a speck of dust off his shoulder:
    - But here in America ...
    “Yes, no more than your America.” Who threw a felt boot into the remote?
  65. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 42
    If this happens, then only memories will remain from NATO! And the USA will hide on their island Buyan and will smile like a Down smile so that they will not be touched further..
  66. +1
    26 February 2016 13: 45
    Another disabled person appeared, this is Joseph Dunford. Judging by his appearance, he doesn’t have much intelligence. Well, McCain, of course, sat in a hole for a long time and got hit on the head with a boot, but this “strategist” can be seen getting hit on the head with a dust bag at one time.
  67. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 45
    The stupid American illiterate general is trying to show off! In case of war there will be no America! Well, how long can America withstand megaton charges on its territory or are they thinking of sitting overseas, naive! For the smart ones, it has long been stated that 50% of the charges are in America, and the rest are in all NATO military bases! I hope there are still smart generals in America!
  68. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 51
    I'm tired of this bragging and lies about Russia's aggressiveness, come to your senses,
    and remember what will remain of your power and the planet.
  69. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 58
    How many countries presented Hitler with their military contingents and economic potential in WWII and where did they all end up by May 1945, American General?
  70. 0
    26 February 2016 13: 59
    there, that the exacerbation began, by the spring, perhaps, the beeps started ringing, the fart probably infected them all there with rabies, just let them stick around, they will be erased from history forever as civilizations, although what the hell are they... civilizations, swindlers and hucksters
  71. 0
    26 February 2016 14: 01
    “This is all the strength of the defense of the European allies,” he noted. “And we have plans for this,” said Carter.

    The general is itching at one point... He really wants to “collide” with Russia. General... But he doesn’t understand.
  72. 0
    26 February 2016 14: 09
    Until these divisions are assembled there won’t be a damn thing left from NATO
  73. 0
    26 February 2016 14: 13
    Is this the “clear signal” that the drug addict promised?
  74. +1
    26 February 2016 14: 20
    Russia will face the full might of NATO
    Yeah!
  75. +1
    26 February 2016 14: 21
    As a military expert, I declare with full responsibility, “there will be little room for EVERYONE!” So ​​it’s better to let smart people fight the Yankers in words. We have a strong diplomatic corps. And the military and special forces will support by demonstrating their capabilities PS It wasn’t enough to move into a bunker before retirement.
  76. 0
    26 February 2016 14: 25
    delirious. You'll understand. Do they want to attack and are they intimidating or are they waiting for our attack and trying to intimidate us? What legend is there in the media from generals and non-generals?
  77. +1
    26 February 2016 14: 41
    "In the event of hostilities, Russia will see the full power of NATO"

    Rather, pale weakness, which is what NATO is.
  78. 0
    26 February 2016 14: 44
    In the event of war, NATO will face the full might of Russia. I think it won’t seem a little to anyone. It will be surprising if this general survives the first 20 minutes after the start...
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 17: 40
      Yes, this general, along with the others, will be holed up in the bunker.
  79. 0
    26 February 2016 14: 52
    Go, uncle, scare your mother. The whole history of Russia is the campaign of all Europe against Rus'.
    And who held the parades in the capitals?
    Europe in our Moscow or RUSSIANS in your Berlin, Paris.
    and further ad infinitum? Europe's memory is weak, just like the backside of the Gay Europeans.
  80. 0
    26 February 2016 14: 57
    Quote: Lanista
    Yeah. POWER. POWER even.

    There are a lot of them - as many as 27 have stuck to the SGA. Therefore, let’s put it correctly: “POWERS”.
    Quote: VP
    Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania - these are already three countries that will collapse with all their might. If Luxembourg, Albania and Iceland join them, they will simply bury us.

    Quote: Wheel
    Poland, Poland forgot!

    And these 27 must be clearly aware that with all our special attitude towards the SGA, we will have to carve out something for them, and those who have hosted the missile defense system - of course, as a bonus - without a queue!
  81. 0
    26 February 2016 14: 59
    "The Power of Nato"?? Don't worry about my slippers!
  82. 0
    26 February 2016 15: 14
    Video about America ;-)

    Gleb Kornilov (Dangerous) - America

  83. 0
    26 February 2016 15: 27
    The painting “For Mushrooms” will take on a new meaning for NATO countries.
  84. 0
    26 February 2016 15: 43
    The Americans again want to fight on a foreign continent, but now a different situation will overtake retribution everywhere. Are the Geiroites and the brave Stars and Stripes ready to die in large numbers, an order of magnitude more than in Vietnam, for example? Good grief generals, let me answer this question for myself.
  85. 0
    26 February 2016 15: 53
    Quote: Gardamir
    Announce the entire list ..... please
    that's who fought against the USSR
    Here is a curious archival document - a list of prisoners of war who surrendered to Soviet troops during the war. Recall, a prisoner of war is one who fights in uniform with weapons in his hands.
    So,
    Germans - 2 389 560,
    Hungarians - 513 767,
    Romanians - 187 370,
    Austrians - 156 682,
    Czechs and Slovaks - 69 977,
    Poles - 60,
    Italians - 48 957,
    the French - 23,
    Croats - 21 822,
    Moldavians - 14 129,
    Jews - 10 173,
    the Dutch - 4,
    Finns - 2 377,
    Belgians - 2 010,
    Luxembourgers - 1652,
    Danes - 457,
    Spaniards - 452,
    gypsies - 383,
    Norwegians - 101,
    Swedes - 72.
    but even here not all are listed, so there is experience in battles against "all" Europe.

    As long as there is no exceptional nation on the list, there will be no end to the bravado tirades.
  86. 0
    26 February 2016 16: 00
    Stupid general! It is NATO that will face the full might of the Russian army and surrender if it has time.
  87. 0
    26 February 2016 16: 07
    General: in case of war, Russia will face with all the power of NATO

    They say: the weak threatens with his fist...
  88. 0
    26 February 2016 16: 16
    All 28 states will fit in Kolyma. not counting the strait to them. Kurchatov between Mexico and Canada...
  89. 0
    26 February 2016 16: 20
    By that clash, and this is not soon, soldiers from all 28 countries will change gender and get confused
    in solving sexual problems!
  90. 0
    26 February 2016 16: 53
    Yes, I beg you... A. Nevsky Yaroslavich already encountered the then NATO both on the Neva and on Lake Peipus. In WWII, in general, everything that was then NATO was aimed at Russia. Napoleon took Moscow and did it help him? Also, NATO gathered everything for the campaign.....I ended my life on the quiche, like food for lice, poisoned. And everyone is obsessed with this same-sex man.
  91. +1
    26 February 2016 17: 07
    Dunford said at a congressional hearing.
    Well done among the sheep, but against the well done the sheep itself!
  92. 0
    26 February 2016 17: 32
    Gentlemen.....look at these. They are in a psychiatric hospital for treatment, but they make statements to the whole world, and many people clap and rejoice.
    And I would like to remind them again and ask how many times have you tried to take over from Rus' to Russia? This time if you try, you will disappear from the face of the EARTH.
    1. 0
      26 February 2016 17: 42
      Personally, they never participated in any war, but only talked about wars.
  93. 0
    26 February 2016 18: 00
    Do they scare us or are they afraid themselves? what
  94. 0
    26 February 2016 22: 00
    Of these 28 states, it is enough to knock out the main three with the first blow. The rest will immediately wipe themselves off and do ku.
    The main thing is to immediately explain this clearly to them, there is no point in fighting in Estonia, it is much smarter to kill England right away.
  95. 0
    26 February 2016 22: 52
    In the event of hostilities, Russia will see the full power of NATO, the power of all 28 member states of the organization, RIA Novosti reports a statement by the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) Joseph Dunford.

    The general does not know the following saying: “the larger the cabinet, the louder it falls.” Already discussed in detail. smile
  96. +1
    26 February 2016 23: 02
  97. 0
    27 February 2016 18: 51
    In the event of war, NATO will face the full might of the Russian army, the Cossacks will again be in Paris trying French... and buns too. angry laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"