Military Review

General: in case of war, Russia will face with all the power of NATO

224
In the event of hostilities, Russia will see the full power of NATO, the power of all the 28s in the organization’s organization, reports RIA News Statement by the Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), Joseph Dunford.




“If Russia faces NATO, it will face the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries that belong to it,”
Dunford said at a congressional hearing.

"The military exercises that the US is conducting in Europe are part of showing it," he added.

The head of the Pentagon, Carter, said at the same hearings that "the US intention to quadruple its assistance program to European allies (up to $ 3,4 billion) is a signal that the United States and NATO are ready to defend their territory."

“This is all the strength of the defense of the European allies,” he noted. “And we have plans for this,” said Carter.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
224 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 26 February 2016 12: 28
    42
    If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

    You are illiterate, general! Go read the story!
    1. elmi
      elmi 26 February 2016 12: 31
      57
      In the event of hostilities, Russia will see the full power of NATO, the power of all the 28 member states

      Russia was never the first to attack, but if NATO dares to attack Russia, then for the last time they will see fungi in the sky, let them not console themselves that we will not dare to use nuclear weapons
      1. GDP
        GDP 26 February 2016 12: 38
        66
        Approximately 70% of NATO’s military power is the United States. So at least one USA, even 28 - the difference is small. The result will be one, in case of an unfavorable situation for us - the nuclear armageddon will cover everyone ...

        As Yeltsin said - "We also have heads" :)



        In Russia, at least there is room to move from the radioactive desert, Mother Siberia is big, and where will the surviving Europeans go to live? Will they accept Islam and go to Libya and Syria? They will be loved very much there and many times ...

        Europe, unlike Russia, is absolutely not prepared for a nuclear war, we have entire underground cities full of millions of tons of canned goods, felt boots, jerseys, Kalashnikovs and other vital things. We as a nation will survive, they will not ...
        1. Pravdarm
          Pravdarm 26 February 2016 12: 40
          32
          Russia will see the full power of NATO
          We saw these! laughing
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 26 February 2016 12: 47
            28
            Well, this is not an indicator. But the fact that the US strongest land grouping with enviable periodicity receives cabbage soup in Iraq and Afghanistan, that says a lot. And this enemy has no aircraft and a half-dead fleet of armored vehicles.
            1. severniy
              severniy 26 February 2016 13: 16
              10
              I recalled: the Chukchi Chinese declared war.
              The Chinese, yes, you're crazy! After all, we are billions !!!!
              Chukchi-yay, where are we going to bury you all .....
              But it’s hard to believe that these donkeys will snatch all as one piece. Indeed, one can easily rake in one’s teeth and how can states simply cease to exist, while popes will sit out over the seas ...
              1. edge
                edge 26 February 2016 13: 39
                +1
                Quote: severniy
                while popes overseas will sit ...

                Dad will not sit out, they just irrevocably pass .....
              2. 2С5
                2С5 26 February 2016 16: 17
                0
                ... US and NATO are ready to defend their territory "...

                ... yopt! From whom!? Only if from x "o" trash with priboltikami and from the "fifth column" ... Duc here you are, it’s your own fault, it’s not fucking to grow them ...
          2. BilliBoms09
            BilliBoms09 26 February 2016 12: 49
            15

            “If Russia faces NATO, it will face the full power of the alliance, all 28 member countries,” Dunford said at a congressional hearing.
            The main power in NATO is the United States, well, a couple more - three countries can do something. And the rest of the ballast and their protection will need to be diverted resources. And in general, something NATO officials are more and more often howling about aggressive Russia. Russia has become so insolent that it is already on the borders of NATO countries. wassat
            1. Pravdarm
              Pravdarm 26 February 2016 13: 00
              10
              The main power in NATO is the USA
              Hey Ameripeeds! And what about: "there it is, Mikhalych":
              1. Wedmak
                Wedmak 26 February 2016 13: 15
                +2
                It is armed with an 30-mm built-in gun

                And shown on the OLS.
                The final price of F-35 rose

                But 200 was riveted. And the gun is shown instead of the 4-barrel - the 6-barrel.
                Somehow, advertising is more like American laudatory videos.
              2. Vita vko
                Vita vko 26 February 2016 13: 20
                +2
                “US intention to quadruple its program of assistance to European allies (up to $ 3,4 billion) is a signal that the US
                will do the dirty work with the wrong hands. Europe is already filled to the eyeballs by immigrants from the Middle East, it remains to strike out and the same chaos as Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria will come in Europe.
              3. ferdiperdozzz
                ferdiperdozzz 26 February 2016 13: 22
                -2
                Throw in hats.
                The four-barreled gun in the picture is six-barreled.
                You can’t be so clumsy
              4. severniy
                severniy 26 February 2016 13: 29
                +1
                Even in the video about f35 it is said about a four-barreled cannon, and in the video there are 6 trunks ....
        2. vell.65
          vell.65 26 February 2016 12: 51
          12
          Quote: GDP
          As Yeltsin said - "We also have heads" :)

          It would be better if he had a head instead of a head on his shoulders at that time.
          1. GDP
            GDP 26 February 2016 12: 55
            10
            It would be better if he had a head instead of a head on his shoulders at that time.

            That's for sure ... A bastard killed such a country ...
            1. Black Colonel
              Black Colonel 26 February 2016 13: 06
              +8
              He finished off the country, and began to kill from the 85th.
              1. 2С5
                2С5 26 February 2016 16: 27
                +2
                "Perestroika and Acceleration, the Revolution Continues" is one of the most monumental works of Emesagorbachev ... as I remember what we have in school in social science brain zasi "rali, already sick ...
            2. 72jora72
              72jora72 26 February 2016 15: 43
              0
              That's for sure ... A bastard killed such a country ...
              Fortunately, our country is so large and has such a margin of safety that EBN and the company did not have enough time to destroy everything (which pleases)
          2. Simon
            Simon 26 February 2016 13: 06
            +2
            That's right, one should think not with the head between the legs, but with the head on the shoulders. They do not think that if they start a war, they themselves will meet with all the power of Russia and well-trained troops. fool
        3. Generalissimo
          Generalissimo 26 February 2016 13: 17
          0
          No one will survive. Even cockroaches, and not just in your head.
          :-)
        4. edge
          edge 26 February 2016 13: 36
          +3
          Quote: GDP
          So at least one US, at least 28 - the difference is small. The result will be one

          yeah, I remember we had 28 Baku commissars, buried them in a civilian ..... we’ll do the same, all 28 ....... I am especially pleased with the military power of the Baltic states, Romanians, Czechs, Bulgarians, Germans and other husks .Kol they instead of protecting their women began to dress up in a skirt-type replace in the female field drinks
          1. avia1991
            avia1991 26 February 2016 17: 46
            +2
            Quote: hert
            I remember we had 28 Baku commissars, they buried them in a civilian ..... we will do exactly the same, all 28 ...

            Actually, there were 26 of them ..
            And 28 is about Panfilov’s heroes. And this is History, it is desirable to write such things more precisely, and more objectively.
            1. asiat_61
              asiat_61 26 February 2016 22: 12
              0
              EG thing is dangerous.
            2. cap
              cap 27 February 2016 18: 49
              0
              Quote: avia1991
              Quote: hert
              I remember we had 28 Baku commissars, they buried them in a civilian ..... we will do exactly the same, all 28 ...

              Actually, there were 26 of them ..
              And 28 is about Panfilov’s heroes. And this is History, it is desirable to write such things more precisely, and more objectively.


              And you didn’t have a chance to put the credit "for proletarian origin", I happened. The soldier was from a rigging platoon, a good soldier, but ... let's say, from the hinterland. There was no UGE then, but the difference between town and country was. .I had to work with the victims of education reform.
        5. Semen Semyonitch
          Semen Semyonitch 26 February 2016 13: 42
          0
          Quote: GDP
          Will they accept Islam and go to Libya and Syria? They will be loved very much there and many times ...

          They don’t get used to it ...
        6. novobranets
          novobranets 26 February 2016 13: 44
          +1
          Quote: GDP
          Europe, unlike Russia, is absolutely not prepared for a nuclear war, we have entire underground cities full of millions of tons of canned goods, felt boots, jerseys, Kalashnikovs and other vital things. We as a nation will survive, they will not ...
          let them not console ourselves that we will not dare to use nuclear weapons

          In Europe, especially in the USA, few people know what nuclear war is. It is believed there that after a nuclear war, after serving some time in the bunker, you can go out and start living as usual. Well, it’s clear there, everyone knows what they teach in Western schools — homosexuality, tolerance (God forgive me), and so on. Western miracles. But I am extremely surprised by the reaction of members of the forum, whom I used to consider people to be literate and sober. All these preparations, food supplies and weapons, all this is nonsense. They can help in a natural disaster, but not in a war. Because there will be nowhere to go. Bunkers, this is only an extension of agony. Rising radioactive dust shields sunlight, air currents carry it all over the planet. The plants that need light for life will die first, then herbivores will die, having lost their nutrition, followed by predators. Nuclear winter, with a global drop in temperature across the planet, isotope poisoned air and soil. This is only one aspect. All living things who are lucky enough to survive after the attack are doomed. What relocation, what other clean places? Forget none of this will happen. 0,001% of survivors who die a slow painful death of people, that’s what will happen if a nuclear catastrophe erupts. Think about it the next time you are about to flaunt a nuclear club. hi
          Is it weak to argue minus?
          1. GDP
            GDP 26 February 2016 14: 46
            +4
            I did not minus, but still I will answer - The consequences of a massive nuclear strike are still unknown. The same nuclear winter is nothing more than a hypothesis.
            At one time, scientists said that after the use of a thermonuclear bomb with a power of several 10 megatons, a nuclear chain reaction would begin in the atmosphere - this did not happen.
            The world knew power strikes tens or even hundreds of times stronger than the combined nuclear stockpile of the USSR and the USA. Life went on, only a few species perished.
            The effects of nuclear armageddon are greatly exaggerated ...
            The action of nuclear bombs, even the largest ones, is quite local ...
            Yes, the consequences will be terrible, but this does not mean the death of civilization ...
            1. Svetlana
              Svetlana 26 February 2016 15: 29
              +1
              However, the dinosaurs became extinct. And it seems precisely because of the cold snap on Earth. Cooling occurred due to the screening of sunlight by dust.
              1. GDP
                GDP 26 February 2016 16: 21
                +2
                The reason for the extinction of the dinosaurs was the fall of a huge body not far from the Yukatan Peninsula. The impact power was comparable with the simultaneous explosion of tens of thousands of nuclear bombs. The impact was global on the biosphere of the entire planet.
                the consequence is the extinction of large reptiles, including dinosaurs, but most of the species continued to live as if nothing had happened, and for warm-blooded dawn did come. The same dinosaurs lived millions of years after the disaster
                such a monstrous impact occurred as a result of the fact that the blow was concentrated in one place, which caused a huge emission of ash and dust.

                The nuclear weapons of mankind, even with massive use, are not able to achieve the same effect, and the strikes will not be concentrated, spread over large areas.

                If this happens, I think the climate will really change for the worse, but humanity will survive, and the war will continue ...
                Anyone who is better suited to harsh conditions and has a great will to win will win ...
              2. 2С5
                2С5 26 February 2016 16: 32
                +2
                ... this is just the law of evolution and a chain of random coincidences ... after all, after the disappearance of dinosaurs, life on Earth did not disappear and it is not known what else would have survived then ... maybe there would have been no one to argue with in the "Military Review" .. ... crying
            2. novobranets
              novobranets 26 February 2016 16: 42
              +2
              A small example, it may not be the most successful, but ... August 26, 1883 there was an eruption of the volcano Krakatau. Shock waves 7 times walked around the Earth, created a 36-meter-high tsunami and a tidal wave, as a result of which the darkness of the people perished. This is only one volcano, not the largest. What will happen if countries with nuclear weapons begin to exchange blows? What do you think?
              The action of nuclear bombs, even the largest ones, is quite local ...
              I agree. Will it be possible to localize the consequences? I don’t think so. People have not yet learned how to control air flow and weather. What about tectonic shifts? To be honest, I don’t even want to think what will happen.
              1. brisk
                brisk 26 February 2016 17: 56
                +3
                Quote: novobranets
                novobranets (3) Today, 16:42 ↑
                A small example, it may not be the most successful, but ... August 26, 1883 there was an eruption of the volcano Krakatau. The resulting shock waves circled the Earth 7 times, created a 36-meter-high tsunami and a tidal wave, which killed the darkness of the people. This is only one volcano, not the largest. What will happen if countries with nuclear weapons begin to exchange blows? What do you think?
                The action of nuclear bombs, even the largest ones, is quite local ... I agree. Will it be possible to localize the consequences? I don’t think so. People have not yet learned how to control air flow and weather. What about tectonic shifts? To be honest, I don’t even want to think what will happen.


                Most of the major cities in the Northern Hemisphere will be burned, all megacities of Russia and the USA destroyed, in Europe the same. If not all, then most. Perhaps, of course, other countries will be captured too --- China, Japan, Korea ... Will it be killed and maimed right away? Well, most likely a billion three to four. Africa and South America are not likely to be directly affected. There will be no nuclear winter as such, but the average temperature on the Earth will decrease by 2 - 3 degrees by 1,5 - 2 years. It will be quite tangible. The main scourge will of course be radiation. If 70% of the arsenals of nuclear powers are expended, what radiation background will there be on the planet? Surely there will be attacks on nuclear power plants. It doesn’t seem weak. Well, let it be, with a finger to the sky, right after the war, it will be an average of 1 R / H. Is it a lot or a little? How many people will be able to adapt to this background, and how many will die out? But for sure it will be only a few days. Then most likely it will fall once in a hundred or two hundred. However, the southern hemisphere will also suffer from radiation much less than the northern one. And in Antarctica, maybe this thermonuclear war will be practically invisible. Something like that most likely. And the volcano Krakatau had a very modest eruption, since everything is relative. 68 years before, in 1815 there was an eruption of the Tambor volcano in Indonesia, five times more powerful. And ash was thrown into the atmosphere about 100 km. cube And then in 1815 in Europe there was a year without summer --- in the summer in Europe it was cold rains and even streams froze. Most likely, a full-scale nuclear war, when most of the nuclear arsenals will be used, is comparable in catastrophe as if an asteroid with a diameter of three kilometers across at the time of the impact were being hit by the Earth. What speed does he have, 30 kilometers per second, no less. And what mass and what kinetic energy is released! And if he flies in the middle of some ocean, it will be more destructive than if it crashes into the land. At least 98% of the world's population will die and be crippled. People, rats are not so scared. Most likely, after such a war, mankind will recover to its pre-war state --- in terms of numbers, technology, and other development --- in at least two thousand years. With genetic mutations from radiation and other things. And what they will be, people then --- is unknown. And whether people will be at all, in principle, is also a question. A terrible thing is such a war, the mind is simply incomprehensible to the present pre-war.
            3. avia1991
              avia1991 26 February 2016 17: 52
              +3
              Quote: GDP
              The world knew power strikes tens or even hundreds of times stronger than the combined nuclear stockpile of the USSR and the USA. Life went on, only a few species perished.
              The effects of nuclear armageddon are greatly exaggerated ...

              And nobody knows the consequences, nor skeptics - nor optimists! And thank God! Because your
              Quote: GDP
              the consequences will be terrible, but this does not mean the death of civilization ...
              - this is also "JUST A HYPOTHESIS" that Tavarischi like McCain and Brzezinski dream to "test in practice! And sober people prefer not to practice! Because Hiroshima and Nagasaki are just REALITY! And at the same time the consequences, despite the low power, Japan still feels!
              1. novobranets
                novobranets 26 February 2016 18: 16
                +3
                Quote: avia1991
                Japan still feels!

                Radiation, in addition to destroying bone marrow, destroys DNA. Defective DNA becomes the cause of congenital severe, often incurable diseases, and malformations. Japan still faces this, and more often than I would like. That bombing in 1945 hit not only contemporaries, but also their offspring.
            4. Talgat
              Talgat 26 February 2016 19: 34
              0
              I agree with GDP

              The consequences of the nuclear conflict were greatly exaggerated - this was one of the arguments for detente. The USSR used to persuade opinions in the West in favor of reducing confrontation - so that the West does not press so hard

              But the West also used our dissidents with the same tale - to surrender everything to the West - to ruin the Union
      2. Maxom75
        Maxom75 26 February 2016 12: 48
        +7
        Die like that with music! If such a war begins, it will be too late to look for winners.
      3. Major Yurik
        Major Yurik 26 February 2016 12: 54
        18
        Call the Yankees, but the experience of Russia suggests that when a "dog wedding" is attacked, the main thing is to bang the leading bitch, and the dogs will scatter almost immediately! America is fucking feminine, isn't it? stop
        1. GDP
          GDP 26 February 2016 13: 09
          +2
          If to bang, then it is necessary to bang all at once and Europe first. The Americans do not have a common border with us, but the European Union and Turkey are close by. If we confine ourselves to America alone, after mutual nuclear strikes, jackals from Europe will attack ...
          1. strannik595
            strannik595 26 February 2016 13: 31
            0
            If to bang, then it is necessary to bang all at once and Europe first. Americans don’t have a common border with us,
            and the Bering Strait? ..... Russia, of course, is a regional power, but its region is the whole world and the common border from America, Japan and China to Europe and Scandinavia wink
            1. strannik595
              strannik595 26 February 2016 14: 32
              +2
              we will build a pontoon in one night laughing
          2. Talgat
            Talgat 26 February 2016 19: 38
            +5
            Quote: GDP
            If to bang, then it is necessary to bang all at once and Europe first. The Americans do not have a common border with us, but the European Union and Turkey are close by. If we confine ourselves to America alone, after mutual nuclear strikes, jackals from Europe will attack ...


            Exactly

            I agree with the GDP again

            The US is isolated, but we are not here

            In the event of such a global conflict - if you exchange blows only with the United States - then there will be a super present for Europe, and for the same Turkey and Japan - no resistance - land in the Far East - capture the bomb - there is no army

            In order to protect the population of the Russian Federation and the Union republics in the event of such a disaster - in response you need to hit all the enemies around
        2. ferdiperdozzz
          ferdiperdozzz 26 February 2016 13: 24
          +2
          One island must be drowned, and all will calm down
      4. Black Colonel
        Black Colonel 26 February 2016 13: 04
        +1
        "... they will see fungi in the sky for the last time ..."
        "They" are more likely to be spores in these fungi.
      5. ban1410
        ban1410 26 February 2016 13: 06
        -13 qualifying.
        Lock yourself in your basement and use nuclear weapons. Do not speak for everyone!
        1. GDP
          GDP 26 February 2016 13: 13
          +4
          And you think if the 3 world war begins, you will have a choice?
      6. vvp2412
        vvp2412 26 February 2016 13: 15
        0
        Nuclear weapons are needed only to deter the United States. Conventional conventional ammunition is sufficient for gay people.
        NATO without the USA is just paper troops! Even the armies of Germany and England are no longer the ones that were 20 years ago ..
      7. Panabebis
        Panabebis 26 February 2016 13: 22
        -1
        let them not console ourselves that we will not dare to use nuclear weapons

        Press the button yourself? laughing
      8. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 26 February 2016 14: 09
        0
        Quote: elmi
        Russia was never the first to attack

        Finns, Turks, Poles, Japanese, Swedes know this for sure. wink
        1. 2С5
          2С5 26 February 2016 16: 33
          +2
          ... Russia does not start a war, it usually ends them wink
          1. Vladimirets
            Vladimirets 26 February 2016 16: 58
            +1
            Quote: 2C5
            ... Russia does not start a war, it usually ends them

            All lovers of beautiful myths would be nice to learn a story. Of course, like other powers, Russia sometimes attacked first, the reasons were different, but this happened.
        2. Ros 56
          Ros 56 26 February 2016 17: 03
          0
          Quote: Vladimirets
          I know about this for sure

          Strange, I do not see the Germans on the list.
          1. Vladimirets
            Vladimirets 26 February 2016 17: 18
            +1
            Quote: Ros 56
            I do not see in the list of Germans.

            And when did we first attack the Germans?
      9. Pirogov
        Pirogov 26 February 2016 17: 30
        0
        let them not console ourselves that we will not dare to use nuclear weapons ........................................ ......................................
        .................................... Correctly drown one unnecessary island of arrogance and 50 years, these dermocrats will be. .to chuh and fart loudly.
    2. Giant thought
      Giant thought 26 February 2016 12: 31
      15
      Russia does not want war, it’s only the North Atlantic hawks who are trying to rekindle it, and if they rekindle it, they themselves will burn it.
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 26 February 2016 12: 38
        +7
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Russia doesn’t want war, it’s only the North Atlantic hawks who are trying to kindle it

        The "North Atlantic hawks" represented by Luxembourg, Albania and the "Baltic tigers" are especially dangerous. Scary, already horror.
        NATO turns itself on with the "Russian threat" and then calms it down with declarations of its own steepness. However, in the event of a rapid military escalation, as long as the NATO member states comply with all bureaucratic procedures, the forward units of the RF Armed Forces will already be beyond the Pyrenees.
        1. Ezhaak
          Ezhaak 26 February 2016 12: 55
          +7
          Quote: Ami du peuple
          NATO reassures itself.

          Exactly so and not otherwise. Last year, in the Netherlands, fighters were instructed to simulate firing firearms with a bang bang voice during a training exercise. The reason is the lack of ammunition. And what happens if all NATO troops start shouting loudly, "puff-puff"? Will I be scared? Will the diaper get dirty? The answer is NO! When I was growing up, nothing was known about diapers, and now I don't wear them. Unlike NATO warriors.
          1. 4ekist
            4ekist 26 February 2016 14: 25
            +2
            And you can "scare" me with a NATO psychic attack, only in a thong.
            1. novobranets
              novobranets 26 February 2016 16: 46
              +2
              laughing
      2. tol100v
        tol100v 26 February 2016 12: 42
        13
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Russia does not want war, it’s only the North Atlantic hawks who are trying to rekindle it, and if they rekindle it, they themselves will burn it.

        Probably Russia should say to the whole world: do not touch Russia, because it will be sad for you! There is plenty of arsenal, not only for the 28 NATO members, but also for everyone else who opens their mouth on Russia's wealth!
      3. Panabebis
        Panabebis 26 February 2016 13: 24
        +2
        and if they light it, they themselves will burn it.

        Cucumbers and tomatoes no longer get off? wassat
    3. Wild_grey_wolf
      Wild_grey_wolf 26 February 2016 12: 37
      19
      I do not remember that Russian specialists allowed themselves statements about destruction, about power, aggression. . . why do they think that they show the height of their culture and principles of etiquette when they say so. . . degradation and degradation again. And they own nuclear weapons.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 26 February 2016 12: 42
        +3
        why do they think that they show the height of their culture and principles of etiquette when they say so

        Because they are Anglo-Saxons, elected, the best of the best nations in the world, and so on and so forth ...
        Well, they think so. It is not clear why the truth.
        1. square
          square 26 February 2016 12: 47
          +8
          Scare, then they themselves are scared to hell.
        2. ferdiperdozzz
          ferdiperdozzz 26 February 2016 13: 26
          0
          But what about the Jews?
      2. 4ekist
        4ekist 26 February 2016 14: 21
        0
        Political boorish.
    4. vell.65
      vell.65 26 February 2016 12: 48
      +2
      Quote: Tatar 174
      If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

      Who the hell are you for, just don’t jerk yourself first and everything will be tip-top. soldier
    5. vovanpain
      vovanpain 26 February 2016 12: 54
      12
      “US military exercises in Europe are part of showing this

      We showed, we laughed. We showed our NATO exercises crap.
    6. bt-50
      bt-50 26 February 2016 12: 56
      +1
      He who comes to us with a sword will die from him!
    7. bt-50
      bt-50 26 February 2016 12: 59
      +1
      whoever comes to us with a sword will die from him!
    8. bt-50
      bt-50 26 February 2016 12: 59
      0
      whoever comes to us with a sword will die from him!
    9. faridg7
      faridg7 26 February 2016 12: 59
      +5
      Quote: Tatar 174
      If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

      And we hamsters have heaven, with all their might,
      Fight? Well, it’s necessary.
    10. ban1410
      ban1410 26 February 2016 13: 04
      -22 qualifying.
      He is a Tatar Tatar! Russia has never reached such idiocy to quarrel with the whole world. With its economic weakness and tiny, compared with 28 NATO countries, a population dispersed over vast expanses, it is easy prey. The only thing that holds back the rational environment is the inadequate swinging of nuclear weapons by Russia.
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 26 February 2016 13: 10
        +7
        Quote: ban1410
        The only thing that restrains a reasonable environment is the inadequate swing of nuclear weapons by Russia

        The only thing that holds back obscene words addressed to you is the threat of a ban from the moderators. "Inadequate swinging", damn it .. Go, wave your cock, "reasonable". Although I deeply doubt that you were taught in childhood, after the process of urination, shake off this organ. So you go in shabby trousers.
      2. guzik007
        guzik007 26 February 2016 13: 27
        +4
        He is a Tatar Tatar!
        ----------------------------------
        Here I "love" such commentators such as a ban. If only to fart. First, read the commentary, do not be lazy, you might understand that the person quoted from the article, and then commented, and in a completely different way.
        And then, where does nationality, my friend? even if his opinion didn’t coincide with yours?
      3. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 26 February 2016 14: 14
        +1
        Quote: ban1410
        inadequate waving of nuclear weapons by Russia.

        In a modern environment, it’s just adequate. yes
      4. 4ekist
        4ekist 26 February 2016 14: 14
        +1
        Filter the bazaar!
      5. 2С5
        2С5 26 February 2016 16: 39
        +1
        ... like "millions of beggars with a nuclear club"? Well, you have had enough! And who and when, not counting N.S. Khrushchev, was waving this very club inadequately, eh? You, the prosecutor not with the CENSOR, did you accidentally wander here? Judging by the color of the shoulder straps, yes ... well, you wandered around and sit in your corner and do not fart, do not expose your senile vices and lack of brain activity ... negative
      6. Ros 56
        Ros 56 26 February 2016 17: 08
        +1
        Quote: ban1410
        inadequate waving of nuclear weapons by Russia.


        Can you give an example when Russia brandished a nuclear weapon, with evidence?
    11. Leviton
      Leviton 26 February 2016 13: 07
      +5
      Quote: Tartar 174

      You are illiterate, general! Go read the story!

      Anecdote in the topic:
      The NATO plans to attack Russia went for historical experience-
      Ask the French when to attack? - Not only not in winter, Napoleon attacked - he froze and lost.
      They ask the Turks - not only didn’t we have a war in the summer and tore at sea and on land ....
      They ask the Germans - only not in the fall - the tanks in the swamp will not be able to drown;
      Ask the Chinese - Well, when? - Now attack them a lot of problems and the Power of Siberia and roads with bridges in the Crimea and industry need to be raised ..... They really need prisoners
    12. Tor5
      Tor5 26 February 2016 13: 14
      +1
      With the saints behind the grave - this general.
    13. edge
      edge 26 February 2016 13: 30
      +1
      Quote: Tatar 174
      If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

      An interesting statement of the question is, someone wants to become part of RUSSIA ..... Sweden, Finland, Poland already were, probably they liked it. And all you need to do is to recall the storerooms and form 3-5 new operational brigades of military commanders to maintain order
    14. 222222
      222222 26 February 2016 13: 40
      +6
      ... for the day of February 25, 2016, the second AMERICAN general speaks for Europe ... HOWEVER !!! laughing
      1. 2С5
        2С5 26 February 2016 16: 43
        +1
        ... he doesn’t speak, but just harnesses just in case ... if America as a state and as a continent has a small cord to arrange where they begin to move interestingly? Underground In the EU created by them, in Africa and BV? It seems as though they are not very happy everywhere ... if I am not mistaken. Well, only if underground lol
    15. Kent0001
      Kent0001 26 February 2016 13: 53
      +1
      .... only with those that will not manage in advance. I think, apart from the Yusovites and Poland themselves, no one will want to fight with the Russian Federation.
    16. urii
      urii 26 February 2016 14: 02
      +1
      An adult is like a man. This general. And he thinks that he is 41 years old. If he already collides. So all poplars and ash and yars will fly to these 28 countries. As if Russia will play shoot-id ... from it forever !!!!
    17. Alekseev
      Alekseev 26 February 2016 14: 39
      +1
      Quote: Tatar 174
      Illiterate you general

      Quote: GDP
      at least one USA, at least 28 - the difference is small. The result will be one, in case of an unfavorable situation for us - the nuclear armageddon will cover everyone ...

      That is why it is not even necessary to mumble about the war with the Russian Federation. Danger to everyone.
      Turak, and also the General Staff! laughing
      1. cergey51046
        cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 37
        +1
        The perimeter is called.
      2. 2С5
        2С5 26 February 2016 16: 46
        +1
        ... they are there in all the headquarters and the State Departments stupid until retirement in black ... but when "exs" become here they are cut through in life! Kulef, they drove away from the trough, so there is nothing to lose, you can smell wink
    18. rpek32
      rpek32 26 February 2016 14: 48
      +1
      for Russia to clash with NATO, it needs to move towards that NATO. in the meantime, only NATO is moving towards Russia. so who will run into anyone is another open question angry
    19. Persistent
      Persistent 26 February 2016 17: 07
      +1
      You are illiterate, general! Go read the story!

      About NATO

      "And you friends, how do not sit down
      You're not good enough for musicians "- grandfather Krylov ...
    20. musorg
      musorg 26 February 2016 18: 14
      +1
      If Russia faces all the power of NATO, then .... we have to give up, the generals are worried!
  2. ArcanAG
    ArcanAG 26 February 2016 12: 29
    19
    Yes, go ahead. A drum on the neck, a feather in w_pu.

    Although I doubt it, to be honest. Most will have different urgent matters.
    1. sever.56
      sever.56 26 February 2016 12: 50
      15
      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2016/172/lqwg742.png

      wassat laughing
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 26 February 2016 14: 52
        +2
        This is kicked out of the White House this year on a bench.
  3. dr.star75
    dr.star75 26 February 2016 12: 30
    16
    Excuse me, will Estonia participate? If so, we will give up!
    1. salad
      salad 26 February 2016 12: 33
      +8
      I can not agree! EEEE Estonia is serious! Even the submarine ski cavalry from Buryatia will not help us
  4. gergi
    gergi 26 February 2016 12: 32
    14
    This Kentucky gondola painstakingly scares a hedgehog with a bare ass. We never forgot that the goblet of the European gopota again gathered at our borders. Again, get the hare. Nothing new, everything is as usual.
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 26 February 2016 12: 49
      11
      Quote: gergi
      This Kentucky gondola painstakingly scares a hedgehog with a bare ass. We never forgot that the goblet of the European gopota again gathered at our borders. Again, get the hare. Nothing new, everything is as usual.

      Not very politically correct, but the idea is accurate!
    2. 4ekist
      4ekist 26 February 2016 14: 10
      +2
      Well, why so sharply, just a used condom with a bare booty.
    3. Kent0001
      Kent0001 26 February 2016 14: 12
      +1
      Yes, this gopota does not disappear anywhere. Everything at our borders is rubbing .... for several centuries ... shaka.ly.
  5. Lanista
    Lanista 26 February 2016 12: 32
    14
    Yeah. POWER. POWER even.
    The Baltic states with the Bulgarians, the Bosnians with the Liechtensteinites will stand together, and even Monaco and San Marino will put out their innumerable divisions to defend Europe.
    Someone remind Comrade NATO General that the Bundeswehr’s most powerful European army has less than 300 tanks, of which not all are on track; the English ground army is only 4 (four) divisions; Italians will rather fight for us than against; France has not decided whether it is a full member of NATO.
    All hope of NATO, apparently, to Belgium, Liechtenstein and Slovakia. And joined Albania.
    1. vvp2412
      vvp2412 26 February 2016 13: 13
      +3
      San Marino will help with the supply of Lambrusca! :)
  6. salad
    salad 26 February 2016 12: 32
    +5
    Well, I'm sure that half will fall off immediately))))
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 26 February 2016 12: 50
      +7
      Quote: salat
      Well, I'm sure that half will fall off immediately))))

      Especially those where there are radars and missile defense!
  7. The black
    The black 26 February 2016 12: 33
    +4
    I think that this general and almost everyone will not see either power or weakness, everyone will be kirdyk. And the aliens will see fragments of the ball. request
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 31
      0
      Well, this is perhaps
      search, the ball will not care.
  8. plotnikov561956
    plotnikov561956 26 February 2016 12: 33
    12
    Twice Europe gathered in a crowd to Russia for pi ... mi, it will receive a third time, they don’t teach history at all
    1. Boatsman_Palych
      Boatsman_Palych 26 February 2016 12: 47
      +6
      So the pin.dosy did not participate, therefore they believe that it will be easier than in Afghanistan and Iraq. There they "won" with a bang.
      1. cergey51046
        cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 30
        +1
        Russia is not Afghanistan, it will be larger.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. tol100v
      tol100v 26 February 2016 13: 00
      +4
      Quote: plotnikov561956
      Twice Europe gathered in a crowd to Russia for pi ... mi, it will receive a third time, they don’t teach history at all

      This time, it will not be Geyropa, but the SGA! And to the fullest! Pseudo - the country that created the Pyramid (Mavrodi is resting) will collapse anyway. How long do you pull off the skin, but it won't get longer and bigger! And these creatures will try once again to provoke the whole world to a new war!
  9. Magic archer
    Magic archer 26 February 2016 12: 34
    +6
    There were many of you ... Always the West lied and started wars with Russia, such eternal dirty tricks. And always got nuts! Once again, the intimidation attempt reminds a monkey that throws itself at a tiger from a tree. She is scared, but she is a hero in front of other monkeys !
  10. VP
    VP 26 February 2016 12: 34
    +4
    Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania - these are already three countries that will collapse with all their might. If Luxembourg, Albania and Iceland join them, they will simply bury us.
    1. Wheel
      Wheel 26 February 2016 13: 00
      +6
      Quote: VP
      Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania - these are already three countries that will collapse with all their might. If Luxembourg, Albania and Iceland join them, they will simply bury us.

      Poland, Poland forgot! laughing
  11. Shuhrat
    Shuhrat 26 February 2016 12: 35
    +6
    Enlighten me, only the Syrian VKS group equals the power of how many states (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, etc.) NATO?
  12. Wedmak
    Wedmak 26 February 2016 12: 35
    +6
    Seriously? The main power of the alliance is the armies and navy of the United States, Britain, France and Germany. The rest is nothing more than a consumable that will be put ahead for slaughter. In order for us to use up more ammunition.
    But the fact that the US is deploying nuclear bombs in Europe and bringing planes to some NATO countries to equip them with these bombs is suspicious. A single F-16, flown where it is necessary with this bomb, will be a very, very unpleasant target - to shoot down or not to shoot down?
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 26
      +1
      It will be exposed to electronic warfare, it will fall and do not need to be shot down.
  13. RomanS
    RomanS 26 February 2016 12: 35
    +3
    What the Americans find hard to refuse is the ability to make presentations out of the blue. NATO!!! The packaging is beautiful, the promises are sweet. But as far as matters are concerned, everything is very restrained, or even generally withdrawn. We have seen this many times, but there are still "Pinocchio" in the world carrying 5 soldo to a famous country.
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 24
      0
      The last time they refused to support their Turkey, against Russia.
  14. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 26 February 2016 12: 35
    +4
    And we already faced. In 1941 Results recall?
  15. PValery53
    PValery53 26 February 2016 12: 36
    +3
    Are these generals not afraid to feel the full power of the Russian Army on their bodies? - Probably, "if something happens", they will "fly, get dressed and rejoice"!
  16. fif21
    fif21 26 February 2016 12: 36
    22
    Announce the entire list ..... please
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 26 February 2016 12: 50
      10
      Announce the entire list ..... please
      that's who fought against the USSR
      Here is a curious archival document - a list of prisoners of war who surrendered to Soviet troops during the war. Recall, a prisoner of war is one who fights in uniform with weapons in his hands.
      So,
      Germans - 2 389 560,
      Hungarians - 513 767,
      Romanians - 187 370,
      Austrians - 156 682,
      Czechs and Slovaks - 69 977,
      Poles - 60,
      Italians - 48 957,
      the French - 23,
      Croats - 21 822,
      Moldavians - 14 129,
      Jews - 10 173,
      the Dutch - 4,
      Finns - 2 377,
      Belgians - 2 010,
      Luxembourgers - 1652,
      Danes - 457,
      Spaniards - 452,
      gypsies - 383,
      Norwegians - 101,
      Swedes - 72.
      but even here not all are listed, so there is experience in battles against "all" Europe.
      1. 4ekist
        4ekist 26 February 2016 14: 03
        0
        And some freaks from the list were not even taken prisoner.
  17. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 26 February 2016 12: 37
    +5
    Frightened ... With such power, they really throw us hats. With indecent name. smile
    1. vell.65
      vell.65 26 February 2016 13: 02
      +1
      Quote: Stroibat stock
      . With such power, they really throw us hats.

      Caps are unlikely, because half of the NATO army in blue handkerchiefs cut. laughing
  18. barclay
    barclay 26 February 2016 12: 37
    +7
    General: in case of war, Russia will face with all the power of NATO
    Grand conclusion! Well, and NATO - with all the power of Russia. Does the general rave about this dream?
    Well then, let him look at least at EU unity in solving problems with migrants.
  19. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 26 February 2016 12: 41
    +7
    What a warlike generality for mattresses)))
    And they do not even allow other options, except for wars in Europe and Russia. It must be understood that in the event of hostilities, mattresses are not guaranteed a quiet stay behind a large puddle and they will be among the first to be distributed
  20. Jan Rudzutak
    Jan Rudzutak 26 February 2016 12: 42
    +5
    That's right with all the power !!! And all Russian bear will be defeated !! It is simply called: n ..... t and does not blush !! it’s necessary to maintain sprats in their centuries-old pain from the Russian state! The realities are different and he knows them very well! All the same, NATO’s analytics are still functioning! Although if you look closely at the NATO army, then such contradictions will emerge that the general will become bad !!!
  21. Masya masya
    Masya masya 26 February 2016 12: 45
    +5
    FT: NATO experts criticized alliance fighting efficiency
    07: 1626.02.2016 (updated: 12: 04 26.02.2016) 728483171
    The armed forces of a number of key members of the organization are harmed by a lack of funding, troops suffer from an acute shortage of working equipment, the authors of the study note.


    RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/world/20160226/1380610623.html#ixzz41GWpcqls
    Decide already, the power of NATO or weakness ...
  22. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 26 February 2016 12: 45
    +4
    look at the map - the sixth part of sushi. and Pearly more than once throughout Europe
  23. Sobol
    Sobol 26 February 2016 12: 46
    +9
    With this "power"? wassat
    1. 4ekist
      4ekist 26 February 2016 13: 59
      +1
      In, another fucking ... dusty bag.
    2. Alexander_
      Alexander_ 26 February 2016 14: 02
      0
      Who was staring at?
    3. BARKHAN
      BARKHAN 26 February 2016 17: 27
      +2
      Quote: SoboL
      With this "power"?

      The warrior must inspire fear; the same will bring terrible laughter.
  24. galakt
    galakt 26 February 2016 12: 47
    0
    On this occasion, everything has been said in Munich by the representative of the Russian Federation.
  25. aszzz888
    aszzz888 26 February 2016 12: 48
    +4
    The pedicots scream again! laughing
  26. niki233
    niki233 26 February 2016 12: 50
    +3
    And somewhere to bury them all, got their howl!
  27. Vadxnumx
    Vadxnumx 26 February 2016 12: 50
    -2
    The question is who will fight and for what?
    If for 92 mrd. greens that the Central Bank placed in US bonds, for Miller, Rottenberg, Matvienko and others ...
    WILL NOT GO!!
    PS Mixed with shit Donbass, crippled the fate of people of the whole region and betrayed oblivion!
    Now we have only reports about the blitz krieg in Syria, the hypocrisy of those holding power is over the top!
    1. Batia
      Batia 26 February 2016 13: 45
      +4
      will you sit under your skirt? GREAT MEN'S ACTION.
    2. strannik595
      strannik595 26 February 2016 13: 54
      +5
      The question is who will fight and for what?
      for Russia, brother. In World War II, too, they did not fight for the Jewish Bolsheviks
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 26 February 2016 14: 59
        +2
        Yes, and there’s no need to fight, the war will end within 1 hour - but all who survive will be engaged in construction, analysis of rubble and cleaning up the country's territory from radioactive fallout.
    3. unsinkable
      unsinkable 26 February 2016 15: 11
      +2
      Quote: Vad65
      The question is who will fight and for what?

      Take away the flag of Russia, darned. negative
    4. faridg7
      faridg7 28 February 2016 06: 01
      +1
      Well, I'm for the house and relatives. Do you remember the oath? there is nothing about greenery and the central bank
    5. The comment was deleted.
  28. pts-m
    pts-m 26 February 2016 12: 50
    +4
    Pendos call themselves a “cultural” nation, and behave like that drunkard who sees and understands that he can’t deal with a sober oncoming person. He starts to fidget and wave his hands, hinting that he is as cool as a boiled ostrich egg and what the hell he was not harassed and made no comments on uncultured behavior in society.
  29. Achilles
    Achilles 26 February 2016 12: 50
    +4
    Quote: Tatar 174
    If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.


    NATO has a thin gut to fight to the fullest with us, they can only bomb the natives, in Europe there are almost no men and women transgender people left alone, they (NATO) are not able to fight until the last, just a darling is not enough
  30. afrikanez
    afrikanez 26 February 2016 12: 50
    +4
    Wow, the general scared. Interesting: he himself did not put in his pants from his words? And d and about whom I decided to take on the "show-off", we are already scared scared. But with regard to the states, this is another question, will they be present on the world map or not! negative
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 18
      0
      They will not, the volcano will try.
  31. TVM - 75
    TVM - 75 26 February 2016 12: 51
    +7
    Our people can scold the government, the president, the neighbor, but if anyone gets on Russia, then he will scrape it off from all sides. Look at these faces! They do not even imagine what awaits them. if they turn up! Lavrov correctly said .. DB.
  32. askort154
    askort154 26 February 2016 12: 54
    +4
    Generals became balabol as politicians. Just yesterday, he complained that NATO might not cope with Russia. He cited many shortcomings in NATO's combat readiness, and in particular, one example: in Germany, out of 39
    helicopter gunships, only 10 are in readiness.
  33. Damask
    Damask 26 February 2016 12: 55
    +1
    Throughout history, this fucking alliance has been fighting against Russia, only the names and their commanders are changing am
  34. sabakina
    sabakina 26 February 2016 12: 58
    +6
    If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

    1.Belgium
    2.The Great Britain
    3.Day
    4.Italy
    5.Iceland
    6.Canada
    7.Lüksembourg
    8Netherlands
    9.Norway
    10.Portugal
    11.US
    12.France
    13.Gretia
    14.Turkey
    15.Germany
    16.Spain
    17Vengriya
    18.Poland
    19.Czech Republic
    20.Bulgaria
    21.Latvia
    22.Latva
    23.Rumnia
    24.Links
    25.Sloves
    26.Estonia
    27.Albania
    28.Croatia

    And who is the power here?
    1. afrikanez
      afrikanez 26 February 2016 13: 02
      +1
      Well, most likely Luxembourg and "pribludy". Here is Nata's main power lol
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 26 February 2016 15: 01
      0
      Ukraine has been forgotten - it is almost in NATA by "POWER".
  35. EvgNik
    EvgNik 26 February 2016 12: 59
    0
    “And we have plans for this”

    A general without a plan is not a general. But to what extent are people lean - they have eaten mustard felts, they don’t like plans.
    1. 4ekist
      4ekist 26 February 2016 13: 56
      0
      These are not faces, but physiognomies asking for a brick.
    2. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 16
      0
      These are the plans and light, so as not to be scared.
  36. Tektor
    Tektor 26 February 2016 13: 01
    +1
    It is possible that the peace plan for the Syrian settlement violated the plans of some concerned departments in the states and not only. And immediately there was a murmur and groaning, bordering on extravagance. Zakharova aptly nailed him with an "anecdote". And we need to take into account the power of NATA, not to give the opportunity to plan their scenario. As it happens.
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 14
      0
      They are well done against the sheep, and against the good, the sheep themselves.
  37. elenagromova
    elenagromova 26 February 2016 13: 01
    +4
    And you do not scare, you bastard. Hitler in his time already fucked
  38. ru0234
    ru0234 26 February 2016 13: 02
    0
    ... and after that, 26 countries "run out of gas", one will grow a nuclear mushroom, and the remaining power of one, the largest country of the alliance, will scatter when the hamburgers in the sunken supply ships go out! ))))
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 13
      0
      When the volcano wakes up.
  39. red joni
    red joni 26 February 2016 13: 04
    0
    they will be thrown out with nuclear caps to us. hi
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 12
      0
      Even if the Russian command is destroyed, the perimeter itself, without a command, will work on the goals entered.
  40. valent45
    valent45 26 February 2016 13: 04
    +1
    They’re all scaring, scaring, they won’t calm down in any way! It seems that they do it
    in order to frighten themselves and their population more, well, and to get more money
    in satellite countries and in congress.
    1. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 10
      0
      They scream out of fear.
  41. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 26 February 2016 13: 04
    +2
    “If all the power of the alliance, all the countries included in it is 28”, encounters Russia, it will encounter the problem of mass organization of mass graves.
    Ukraine has already prepared ditches, it can help.
  42. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 26 February 2016 13: 05
    +2
    Well, what else can they say? What can only with the help of US troops NATO be able to defend the Lamanche, giving up the entire territory in a few weeks? The people will rightfully be outraged - and then why? So cheeks are inflated with all their might!
  43. teron
    teron 26 February 2016 13: 07
    +4
    We joke in vain - the United States and its allies are stupidly more, they are armed no worse than the Russian army (it is clear that not all of them). In addition to the armies of NATO allies, there will also be a lot of volunteers from there. In addition, the United States and its allies (albeit not all of them) have a powerful economy, advanced industry and science. Without our nuclear arsenal, the "Jedi" would have long ago come to us under any pretext (or even without it). They are very tempted to wipe Russia off the face of the Earth. For the sake of such a goal, they would not only sacrifice the Estonian-Romanian-Poles, but would also kill their own in any quantity. In the Citadel of Liberty, this is called "acceptable loss".
    1. Flinky
      Flinky 26 February 2016 14: 14
      0
      Do not forget that if something happens the first blow will be on "a powerful economy, advanced industry and science."
    2. Alexander_
      Alexander_ 26 February 2016 14: 16
      0
      Duck, nuclear potency is not for the mind.
    3. cergey51046
      cergey51046 26 February 2016 16: 07
      0
      One nuclear strike on a volcano and no USA. The rest themselves will resort to lick the ass of Russia. Read about the perimeter.
      1. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 26 February 2016 16: 09
        +1
        Quote: cergey51046
        One nuclear strike on a volcano and no USA. The rest themselves will resort to lick the ass of Russia. Read about the perimeter.

        Wow, the beloved Uryakal volcano has not been remembered for a long time)))))))) We will throw their caps and put cotton wool on it and that's all)))
  44. ivan bogomolov
    ivan bogomolov 26 February 2016 13: 07
    +2
    The Hollywood film industry has done its job, no memory or brains of these generals, Avatar and more. request
  45. GUKTU
    GUKTU 26 February 2016 13: 09
    +1
    Just mattresses have not raked for a long time. Feeling of dullness. And more ... Hide behind the alliance is a manifestation of cowardice
  46. Valter1364
    Valter1364 26 February 2016 13: 09
    +1
    If you change the power of weakness, then the title of the article will be correct. smile
  47. Demon
    Demon 26 February 2016 13: 09
    +2
    Quote: sabakina
    If Russia clashes with NATO, it will clash with the full power of the alliance, all 28 countries included in it.

    1.Belgium
    2.The Great Britain
    3.Day
    4.Italy
    5.Iceland
    6.Canada
    7.Lüksembourg
    8Netherlands
    9.Norway
    10.Portugal
    11.US
    12.France
    13.Gretia
    14.Turkey
    15.Germany
    16.Spain
    17Vengriya
    18.Poland
    19.Czech Republic
    20.Bulgaria
    21.Latvia
    22.Latva
    23.Rumnia
    24.Links
    25.Sloves
    26.Estonia
    27.Albania
    28.Croatia

    And who is the power here?

    Well, who? "Baltic Tigers", Romanians, Luxembourg, Iceland. But the most fierce of all NATA are, of course, the Albanians!
    1. Riv
      Riv 26 February 2016 13: 49
      +1
      The coolest Luxembourg construction battalion ...
    2. 4ekist
      4ekist 26 February 2016 13: 49
      +1
      List of political prostitutes.
    3. Alexander_
      Alexander_ 26 February 2016 14: 00
      0
      I remember there is an old film - "300 Albanians"))
  48. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 26 February 2016 13: 10
    +1
    In the event of hostilities, Russia will see the full power of NATO, the power of all the 28 member states
    The feeling is strange, like that (stupid person) who sees a rake, has already raised his foot to step on them, while he himself has done this several times before, but still, like a mantra, he repeats to himself, yes, but now it will be a little painful, otherwise you look and the rake will break, that's when !!! "Then" - it won't! There will be rakes, either with a proven birch handle, or all-metal - forged!
  49. Horn
    Horn 26 February 2016 13: 10
    +3
    Well, yes, you are 28 ... And we are the army! Where are we going to bury 28 NATO members? Russia has always fought with superior forces, with all of Europe. So what?
  50. emercom1979
    emercom1979 26 February 2016 13: 11
    0
    The statement from the category "A good show is more expensive than money", however, did not pass. Although it may have slipped into NATO ...