Military Review

Components for IL-112V will begin to arrive in Voronezh in April

85
The Ulyanovsk enterprise Aviastar-SP will start supplying components for the assembly of an Il-112 light transport aircraft to the Voronezh aircraft plant in April of this year, reports MIC With reference to the message of the general director of the enterprise Sergey Dementiev.




“The first deliveries to Voronezh will begin in April, the parts have already begun to be made,” said the head.

According to him, “as part of the project, the company began to manufacture panels on the fuselage compartments, hatches and doors.”

Collect airplanes will be at the aircraft factory in Voronezh. For the assembly of military transport workers will be used only domestic parts.

As previously reported, the Ministry of Defense should get 62 such aircraft.

Help newspaper: “Lightweight IL-112V with a carrying capacity of six tons is created to replace the An-24 and An-26 aircraft. The aircraft is intended for transporting and airborne landing of light weapons and military equipment, cargo and personnel. The machine is equipped with a modern digital on-board electronic equipment complex, a "glass cabin". In 2017, it is planned to transfer the first flight model of the IL-112В to the first stage of the state joint tests. ”
Photos used:
KLA, booklet, 2010 g
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Limon1972
    Limon1972 26 February 2016 10: 05
    17
    Handsome, it's time for the old people to change good
    1. seti
      seti 26 February 2016 10: 27
      11
      All is correct. Investing in our aircraft industry, we feed and provide work for our worker. We invest money and get a return on our premeditation. Therefore, we are returning the full production cycle to our country. But the final product is partially possible for export.
      1. Pravdarm
        Pravdarm 26 February 2016 10: 39
        -7
        That is to replace the An-26 should come IL-112, according to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and designers of Design Bureau "Ilyushin." In principle, aircraft are quite similar in their characteristics. Engine parameters - too. The capacity of the IL-112 is 500 kg more. But this is not the weight that can be considered a plus.
        If for the 70s the performance characteristics of the An-26 were very impressive, then the performance characteristics of the Il-112 for the middle of the 10s of the 21st century already look slightly frivolous. In 2011, the military already abandoned the Il-112v, now the topic has been raised again. Is this not the fault of the notorious import substitution program, under which the concerns want to push projects and developments, let's say, not entirely new.
        What is new is good LVTS (light military transport aircraft)
        What and how much can transport trucks carrying capacity of tons 6?
        One car GAZ-66, blank, board. Same old, like the An-26. And why should it be transported somewhere?
        In the cargo and passenger variant, the declared payload of the 44 fighter. We will calculate the weight of a fighter about 80 kg, meaning a well-trained man, and not a draftee with "lamb" weight. A full set of soldiers weighs about 24 kg. This, together with weapons, ammunition, clothing, etc. That is, one fighter with a personal weapon will weigh 105 kg, or even more. 44 passenger x 110 kg = 4840 kg. And this is practically 80% of the board load. According to the staff list, a motor rifle company from 60 to 100 people, from the paratroopers of the company up to 80 people. That is, for one flight it will be possible to transfer an incomplete company, with a minimum of additional armament (MANPADS, ATGMs and others). And throw this company can only be on 1-2,5 thousand km. And this will go from 2 to 5 hours, the speed on the "cruiser" at IL-112 is equal to 480 km / h (in An-26 cruising was 435 km / hour).
        At that time, while we were launching production, then we were taking off another projects from it, Brazil not only danced at carnivals. But Created a new Brazilian medium transport aircraft designed to replace the C-130 Lockheed. Embraer designers created a good car for unpaved areas.
        TTX KC-390 impressive:
        Cruising speed - 920 km \ hour
        Flight range with cargo tonnes 19 - 6200 km
        The maximum weight that takes the car - 23,6 tonnes
        Length of cargo area almost 16 meters, C-130 - 12 meters, IL-112 - 11,3 meters (with a ramp)
        Standard load - 14,5 tonnes
        For comparison, the weight of our BMP-2 - 14 tons, BTR-70 - 11,5 tonnes of SMP-2 «Tiger» - 6,4 tons.
        So what and where and for how much time can throw a 'new' freighter? In addition to half-company of fighters on the field of the big city?
        Although light is incorrect to compare the IL-114 with an average transporters Embraer, we are trying to understand the issue of expediency of such a machine, and replace them AN-26.
        The first aircraft of the Il-112V series will be built at the Voronezh plant by the end of 2016, maybe it will take its rightful place in the ranks of the Russian Military Technical Aviation Commission, who knows ...
        Read more at: http://avia.pro/blog/il-112v?page=10

        Are we red ones or something?
        1. serverny
          serverny 26 February 2016 11: 32
          +8
          Are you an eccentric or pretending to be?
          Copy-paste other people's stupidities and relaying is an extreme degree of degradation of thinking.
          1. Pravdarm
            Pravdarm 26 February 2016 13: 39
            -3
            What's the problem? I could fill the same thing myself, but copied. There is a pure comparison of the performance characteristics of the IL and the Brazilian new Samal. I wondered why we did not develop something modern! Put up an opinion for discussion! You did not say anything about this! Only an insult!
            Not good, Shurik! not good at all!
          2. Ze Kot
            Ze Kot 26 February 2016 16: 11
            0
            Quote: serverny
            Are you an eccentric or pretending to be?
            Copy-paste other people's stupidities and relaying is an extreme degree of degradation of thinking.



            What's the problem ? Comrade is right. Why do the same? A new plane should be better. Faster, with greater payload, with fuel efficiency ...
        2. g1v2
          g1v2 26 February 2016 15: 09
          0
          There are different types of aircraft in the BTA for different purposes. In total there are 13 types of cargo and passenger aircraft, of which 7 are Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. The carrying capacity and performance characteristics of them are different for different purposes. Before the Maidan, the old An 26 and An 24 were replaced by the An 140, which, although it is considered to be a Ukrainian aircraft, but like most modern ones, were assembled in the Russian Federation. The situation has changed and already planes, the rights to which belong to the enemy country. Accordingly, from here they remembered about the projects of transport sludge 112 and passenger sludge 114. Well, what did someone lose, but someone found. KB Ilyushin was very lucky and they will import Ukrainian and old Soviet ANs. And these are large orders, an upsurge, money, the attention of the state for kb. hi
    2. Giant thought
      Giant thought 26 February 2016 10: 45
      0
      Thank God that things have moved forward, and there were a lot of problems, we are now waiting for the first flights and successful trials.
  2. olegfbi
    olegfbi 26 February 2016 10: 09
    +2
    Very good news!
    Beautiful board!
    1. Temples
      Temples 26 February 2016 10: 24
      -1
      And no feed.
      And which side is beautiful left or right?
      1. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 26 February 2016 10: 31
        +5
        Quote: Temples
        And no feed.
        And which side is beautiful left or right?


        Why jerk something? Do not wait, Russia will not die. Norm airplane, no worse than any Boeing-horseradish.
        1. Temples
          Temples 26 February 2016 14: 23
          -1
          Spring is coming!
          Everything will blossom from day to day.
          And you are going to die.
          Not from that think my friend.
          Breathe life deeply!
          But planes, God willing, in the Russian sky, Russians will fly.
          Do not have time to blink an eye. Look here.
    2. seti
      seti 26 February 2016 10: 34
      +3
      How many new projects does KB Ilyushin have. Il Xnumx of various modifications. IL 112 (MTS), IL-214MD-76А (IL-90). He is also developing a TCP for the prospect of increased carrying capacity. It is clear that all this needs considerable and considerable money, but I hope all this will be brought not just to mind but will be introduced into a large series.
  3. Taygerus
    Taygerus 26 February 2016 10: 13
    +2
    Krasava transporter, great news, and the industry slowly went uphill
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 26 February 2016 10: 16
      0
      Yeah, now the budget for the development of new weapons will be reduced and "will go up the hill"
  4. Coconut Tima
    Coconut Tima 26 February 2016 10: 13
    +6
    The fuel efficiency of the Il-112V is 26 times higher than that of the An-2,4 aircraft.
    1. olegfbi
      olegfbi 26 February 2016 10: 15
      +1
      The fuel efficiency of the Il-112V is 26 times higher than that of the An-2,4 aircraft.

      This is not the main thing for BTA! The main thing in reliability and ease of use!
      Although fuel efficiency is also not in last place!
  5. FID
    FID 26 February 2016 10: 19
    +2
    So what is the good news? 62 cars for the Ministry of Defense ... First, there is no contract yet, and secondly, it’s not enough, the series should be big so that the cost is less ... Yes, all hooray, hooray, hooray .... Wake up, people, there’s no aircraft industry, no! Piece orders DO NOT SOLVE problems ... And do not need about the MC-21, until it appears, its niche in OUR SKY will be occupied by BJ and NEO watermelons ...
    1. Temples
      Temples 26 February 2016 10: 26
      +7
      People woke up.
      It's time for you to wake up.
      What's the use of grumbling?
      There is an aircraft industry, there is!
      Maaaaaalenky such, but exists! smile
      In the manger for now, but growing !!!
      1. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 26 February 2016 11: 17
        +3
        But he will remain tiny until the policy of the leadership of the countries remains the same. In the USSR, only domestic aircraft and production of Czechoslovakia were operated. It is time to stop, even by law, the vicious practice of purchasing foreign equipment, and then the aircraft industry will not be tiny.
    2. Engineer
      Engineer 26 February 2016 10: 26
      +5
      Do you know how long it will take to produce 62 cars at VASO? Not a year or two the plant will be loaded with work. And how many snowfields to catch up! What about foreign customers? Think wider than your TV!
      1. FID
        FID 26 February 2016 10: 33
        +4
        Quote: Engineer
        What about foreign customers? Think wider than your TV!

        Foreign customers ??? Are you science fiction? Obviously, you only watch on TV in Russia ... Aeroflot, state airline, on which planes it flies? What are the large domestic a / c fly on our aircraft ???
        1. Engineer
          Engineer 26 February 2016 10: 51
          +5
          And they didn’t tell you on TV that our aircraft are also willingly bought? Yeah, Jules Verne is in a cube, and also an engineer in the aviation industry, who has visited all the large enterprises of our country and not with excursions! And yes, I don’t have a TV set and I advise you to throw it away. And what does Aeroflot and IL-112 have to do with it? What kind of porridge is in your head? The military does not fly on imported aircraft! Kb Antonov actually no! And we have a huge fleet of Antonov aircraft. And what will he make up for? Airbus A-400 and Embaer Ks-390 according to your logic! I'll upset you very much, but no! Because IL-112 is a green light. And when there is no Antonov, then there will be a niche for him on the international market. Thinks wider than the scope of your TV, or buy a widescreen laughing
          1. FID
            FID 26 February 2016 11: 05
            -1
            Quote: Engineer
            Because IL-112 is a green light. And when there is no Antonov, then there will be a niche for him on the international market. He thinks wider than his

            62 aircraft and all? How much will it cost? Are you a native economist? And this is from your taxes ... It's a shame, it becomes for engineers. I visit many enterprises of the former aviation industry, do you personally like the salary of an engineer of 20000? Drive, work ...
          2. avt
            avt 26 February 2016 11: 14
            +4
            Quote: Engineer
            And they didn’t tell you on TV that our aircraft are also willingly bought?

            From this place in more detail and not about military vehicles, but about transport and civilian ones. Especially in light of the signing of a contract by China with Boeing for more than 400 planes, including analogues of the Superbudget, at the same time enlighten about the fate of the "joint production" of the Superbudget with China. I would also like to recall the propeller-driven ATRs, which the Iranians have already bought according to the 20 + 20 scheme and the Bombardier licks his lips at 60 cars.
            Quote: Engineer
            and also an engineer in the aviation industry, who visited all the large enterprises of our country and not with excursions!

            like maybe he also put on glasses!? wassat And continue to fail
            Quote: Engineer
            . And when there is no Antonov, then there will be a niche for him on the international market. Thinks wider than the scope of your TV, or buy a widescreen

            The TV, on which they generally show that the Il-112/114 is still a chicken in the nest, and the same 114th fly off made of TAPiCH backlog in two years, and add certification, but here are the Western analogs ALREADY in the air, including the unflown 21, but the same Kazakhs get the European analogue of IL-112. So even though you watch a TV without pink glasses, then you will definitely see the answer to the SSI questions
            Quote: SSI
            What are the large domestic a / c fly on our aircraft ???

            Quote: SSI
            Foreign customers ???

            But to do 112 and 114, and 214, all you need is one thing - no one will get us out of the ass that hit us, on the contrary, they will try to push them deeper. It’s necessary to get out of the current somehow, and not to crash with a cry of joy after each screw wrapped in metal, you will have to twist a lot of them - you’ll tear your voice off.
        2. gjv
          gjv 26 February 2016 13: 20
          0
          Quote: SSI
          What are the large domestic a / c fly on our aircraft ???

          Yes, unfortunately only 20% of flights are operated on our aircraft. Rest... request
          Quote: SSI
          I visit many enterprises of the former aviation industry, do you personally like the salary of an engineer of 20000?

          Of course, you need to pay at least 50000 engineers and workers. Who and how will be able to "clear (pierce) the brains of" impudent "effective" managers? request
    3. samoletil18
      samoletil18 26 February 2016 10: 35
      +4
      Quote: SSI
      62 cars for MO ..

      You're right. Hope is only in the civilian aviation sector, and there they look at foreign devices not at all from the lack of obscurity and lack of patriotism. Elementary services should be established at the state level with the participation of the UAC, all design bureaus and the accounting chamber.
    4. barclay
      barclay 26 February 2016 10: 47
      +2
      It starts small. There will be the first aircraft, there will be a contract. The plan for 62 aircraft today is more realistic than for 620. They will release 62, and then it will be visible, and plans will be adjusted. In any case, this is already an indicator of positive work.
      1. FID
        FID 26 February 2016 11: 06
        +2
        Quote: barclay
        62 will be released, and there it will be seen

        Example, T-50 ... How many ordered and how much they actually order .... Nobody KNOWS the numbers ...
        1. DenZ
          DenZ 26 February 2016 11: 22
          -2
          Example, T-50 ... How many ordered and how much they actually order .... Nobody KNOWS the numbers ...

          The fact that no one knows the numbers should justify your grumbling?
          1. FID
            FID 26 February 2016 11: 46
            +4
            Quote: DenZ
            The fact that no one knows the numbers should justify your grumbling?

            Do you think I'm grumbling? Do you personally relate to the aviation industry? Anything?
            1. tomket
              tomket 26 February 2016 13: 25
              +1
              Quote: SSI
              Do you think I'm grumbling? Do you personally relate to the aviation industry? Anything?

              This is the question that interests me. in theory, the factories of our aircraft industry, for example, Irkut are loaded with orders, I can’t do it at all. But somehow the pace of supply is not very impressive. The question is, why, having a decent package of orders, do plants not expand production?
              1. PHANTOM-AS
                PHANTOM-AS 26 February 2016 16: 14
                +1
                Quote: tomket
                But somehow the pace of supply is not very impressive. The question is, why, having a decent package of orders, do plants not expand production?

                The whole question is that there is no comprehensive program for the development of domestic aircraft manufacturing, just as there is no program for the development of industry as a whole.
                The current government will not, and is not able to produce anything, except to figure out how to tear the people.
                No one says how many planes are needed, what types, at what capacities to build them, what forces, what shish.
                Everything that is now going at all is going on its knee. The technological and cooperation ties within the country were destroyed, and many factories were completely destroyed.
                All these blah blah blah of our managers are designed for muscular young ladies throwing litter-caps in zombie ecstasy.
                Here are pictures of a defense plant, what could be a mobilization economy, damn it.
                1. PHANTOM-AS
                  PHANTOM-AS 26 February 2016 16: 17
                  +1
                  Huge was the factory
                  1. afdjhbn67
                    afdjhbn67 26 February 2016 16: 42
                    +1
                    Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                    Huge was the factory

                    Vitya is probably not just one village in the Union without them, I remember my uncle lit on it with a body in front of the face, tin))))))
                    1. PHANTOM-AS
                      PHANTOM-AS 26 February 2016 17: 53
                      0
                      Quote: afdjhbn67
                      probably not one village in the Union was not without them,

                      25 tysh worked on it and I am a sinner, including wink

                      here the news came to the Zaputins:
                      On February 26, the Federation Council approved a federal law providing for an increase in excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel from April 1, 2016. According to the Ministry of Finance of Russia, this will increase the federal budget revenues by 90 billion rubles in 2016, and will also provoke an increase in fuel prices by an average of 5 percent.
                      The adopted regulatory act amends the Tax Code of the Russian Federation. In connection with these changes, the excise tax rate per liter of gasoline will increase by two rubles, per liter of diesel fuel - per ruble. angry am
                      1. tomket
                        tomket 26 February 2016 20: 59
                        +1
                        Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                        In connection with these changes, the excise rate per liter of gasoline

                        Thank God I'm on a gas ride.
                      2. afdjhbn67
                        afdjhbn67 27 February 2016 01: 25
                        0
                        Quote: tomket
                        Thank God I'm on a gas ride.

                        I'm on DT here and I think rejoicing or in vain))))
              2. DenZ
                DenZ 27 February 2016 09: 24
                0
                Here is a photo of a defense plant. Feel the difference? When that plant that worked on your photo (and judging by the architecture it was sooo long ago) That plant that was not on this photo yet.
          2. DenZ
            DenZ 27 February 2016 09: 17
            0
            Do you think I'm grumbling? Do you personally relate to the aviation industry? At least some

            Personally, I think that you are grumbling. I have no direct relation to the aviation industry, but I follow the state of affairs. If you do not know how much the T-50 will be (and no one knows), then why once again insert your ignorance into the general tone of dissatisfaction with our aviation industry, which your posts show through? Why? Tell me? To draw the analogies you need? "The boss is all gone." Do not pump! Perhaps you have more to do with the aviation industry than I do, but it is not permissible to doubt its solvency. I am absolutely sure of this.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. barclay
        barclay 26 February 2016 12: 28
        0
        Yes, the Russian aviation industry today is not in the best shape. But this does not mean that you need to throw the hat on the floor and burst into tears from resentment. The task of rebirth is very difficult and complex, which cannot be solved in a short time. But if now we don’t do this on the remnants of what was available, then we can forget about the domestic aircraft industry. In the production of combat aircraft, the pace is also not high. First of all, we need competent, qualified and interested personnel in the workplace, which is sorely lacking. I think that this is the main catch. And this problem must be solved in a revolutionary order.
    5. PHANTOM-AS
      PHANTOM-AS 26 February 2016 12: 40
      +1
      Quote: barclay
      In any case, this is already an indicator of positive work.

      this is fraud. And such articles of intent can be written every day in hundreds yes
      Every day, the duroscope tells me about positive developments, for 25 years now.
  6. PHANTOM-AS
    PHANTOM-AS 26 February 2016 10: 54
    -1
    Quote: SSI
    62 cars for MO.

    Totally agree with you!
    The people do not understand that more than 100 aircraft are needed to transport and drop a division. In the course of a major research exercise conducted in 1986, the operational-tactical formation of the VTA, which included only Il-76 aircraft (125 aircraft), parachuted 5080 personnel and 138 units of military equipment. At the same time, the depth of the battle formation "flow of detachments" was 40 minutes.
    Since1986, the four divisions of the Il-76, which are part of the BTA, made it possible to carry out the combat mission of landing the Airborne Division without involving other types of aircraft.
    And how many IL-76s are being manufactured now? two a year?
    And with these little things, only the nonsense bosses carry lol
    Yes, there are only 67 units, and only in 2017 they will pass the first sample for state tests belay
    What year will the whole party surrender to? what
    Fuck, here it is Putin's modernization.
    1. FID
      FID 26 February 2016 11: 08
      +1
      Quote: PHANTOM-AS
      And how many IL-76s are being manufactured now? two a year?

      Here, here ... I completely agree with you ...
    2. nov_tech.vrn
      nov_tech.vrn 26 February 2016 11: 58
      +2
      what is IL-76 and what is an-26, this donkey eventually transferred an immense amount of people and cargo, do not forget - military transport aircraft are not only, and not so much airborne landing forces, you should not compare sour and sharp
    3. Cook
      Cook 26 February 2016 15: 42
      +1
      What is the massive airborne landing from the light MTC? Where are the shelves equipped only with An-26 aircraft? What are you talking about? This is usually a control group aircraft.
    4. co-creator
      co-creator 27 February 2016 02: 59
      -1
      Quote: PHANTOM-AS
      Fuck, here it is Putin's modernization.

      Listen antiZAPutinets you registered a sect, or so in illegal immigrants? laughing
  7. Stas157
    Stas157 26 February 2016 11: 59
    +1
    Quote: SSI
    So what is the good news? 62 cars for the Ministry of Defense ... First, there is no contract yet, and secondly, it’s not enough, the series should be big so that the cost is less ... Yes, all hooray, hooray, hooray .... Wake up, people, there’s no aircraft industry, no! Piece orders DO NOT SOLVE problems ... And do not need about the MC-21, until it appears, its niche in OUR SKY will be occupied by BJ and NEO watermelons ...

    What is good news? Yes, in the fact that they are finally starting to make a new plane and this is already a reality! I don’t see any problems, there is an engine, a project too, those who do it (factories) have the same thing, and there is a great need for an army to replace Anov! God himself tells us to do in this situation! While 62 aircraft, then more! You look and other countries are interested. What exactly do you propose, apart from criticism? To not do something?
    1. FID
      FID 26 February 2016 12: 18
      +2
      Quote: Stas157
      To not do something?

      I’ve been in aviation for more than 35 years, you are my precious ... All (more than 30 cars) of the Tu-160 passed through my hands ... And you tell me that it’s good that something is being done ... Yes, nothing is being done! 10-20 aircraft is NOTHING! The plane was then promising when it was LOTS of ordering .... And then, MO ordered 20 cars, and then it will be seen ...
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 26 February 2016 14: 02
        +1
        Quote: SSI
        I’ve been in aviation for more than 35 years, you are my precious ... All (more than 30 cars) of the Tu-160 passed through my hands ... And you tell me that it’s good that something is being done ... Yes, nothing is being done! 10-20 aircraft is NOTHING! The plane was then promising when it was LOTS of ordering .... And then, MO ordered 20 cars, and then it will be seen ...

        And what do you suggest? This hour is not the Soviet Union and there are no unlimited resources. What is being done now, in a crisis, I think this is not bad! You, as an experienced person, tell me what more can be done? I do not see.
        1. FID
          FID 26 February 2016 14: 23
          +4
          Quote: Stas157
          You, as an experienced person, tell me what more can be done? I do not see.

          And I don’t see, I ascertain ... I am retired, doing something young ... Where are they ???
          1. co-creator
            co-creator 27 February 2016 03: 01
            0
            Quote: SSI
            I'm retired, doing something young ...

            Well, if you can’t suggest anything how to do it differently, then why this scribble? Tell how bad everything is compared to the USSR and other countries? We already know this without you.
      2. DenZ
        DenZ 27 February 2016 09: 29
        0
        But why make 40-50 cars if it simply is not necessary in terms of combat effectiveness? You do not take into account the fact that those Tu-160s that were 20 years ago were significantly worse in their capabilities than the Tu-160 upgraded ones that our MO ordered. Maybe you should write Shoigu right away and direct him on the true path? And then we are all such fools here, you are one fine fellow, but retired.
  • Altona
    Altona 26 February 2016 10: 20
    +3
    In general, such machines are not only needed by the BTA. It is necessary to revive small aircraft. Because everyone got into a personal car, the transport problem was not resolved. Now how do you think how public transport has been developed and how much its share has subsided now.
    1. olegfbi
      olegfbi 26 February 2016 10: 24
      0
      For civilian needs there is an IL-114
      1. avt
        avt 26 February 2016 11: 16
        +2
        Quote: olegfbi
        For civilian needs there is an IL-114

        No. The 114th passenger, and the 112th ramp transport, they complement each other, rather than competing.
  • Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 26 February 2016 10: 24
    +2
    In a pile of time, instead of IL-112, some figures actively lobbied the An-140.
    1. Locksmith
      Locksmith 26 February 2016 11: 01
      +1
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      In a pile of time, instead of IL-112, some figures actively lobbied the An-140.

      I heard a conversation that Deripaska, the owner of the Samara Aviation, tried to buy from Ukrainians the documents on an.n. they gave them away, and then this catavasia later began, it’s clear now he didn’t rest on one place now.
      1. avt
        avt 26 February 2016 11: 34
        +8
        Quote: Locksmith
        I heard a conversation that Deripaska, the owner of the Samara Aviation, tried to redeem from Ukrainians the documents on an.

        He also hoped for an Iranian contract, they were planning to release 140 of them there, but everything was covered with a copper basin and the 140th would not fly in Iran, but there would be APR and Bombardier. Our Il-114, and Il-112 stupidly do not have time - the Iranians needed airplanes yesterday, and the moment when Iran was under sanctions and it was possible to turn its hands and arrange deliveries and the same Tu-204/214 were drained while rushing about a completely Western Super Budget, which the Westerners would have shoved into Iran, and now they have skillfully cut off the Super Budget from Iran with their very specific air buses, having killed two birds with one stone - they removed the competitor and put their airplanes on thawed money, pouring that money into their own production and began to be the economy.
        1. co-creator
          co-creator 27 February 2016 03: 10
          -1
          Yes, no one in those years would have let us make their planes, which is why they made this super budget.
          Iran is buying Western planes specifically to protect itself from sanctions if they change their minds, loading workplaces is the best way for this.
    2. samoletil18
      samoletil18 26 February 2016 11: 01
      +4
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      In a pile of time, instead of IL-112, some figures actively lobbied the An-140.

      UMMC plans to produce L-410 in Russia. But, the latest modification will be assembled in the Czech Republic, and we have UVP-E of twenty years ago, as it turned out. And the engine is American. According to other sources, NG will nevertheless do it, but the engine is again overseas.
      This aircraft is used by the air forces of different countries. Again the same rake with sanctions and other "offenses"? Reflections began on this topic back in 2012, but then Klimovsk engines were mentioned, except for the Czech N80, and since 2014 there has been no talk about them.
      1. gjv
        gjv 26 February 2016 13: 36
        +1
        Quote: samoletil18
        UMMC plans to produce L-410 in Russia. But, the latest modification will be assembled in the Czech Republic, and we have UVP-E of twenty years ago, as it turned out. And the engine is American. According to other sources, they will still do NG

        There are no new orders for UVP-E and NG either. And therefore, the plant in the Czech Republic was stopped. Only a small team of engineers and craftsmen who go around and finish the assembled NG goes to work.
    3. avt
      avt 26 February 2016 11: 49
      +1
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      In a pile of time, instead of IL-112, some figures actively lobbied the An-140.

      You are confusing something specifically. An-140 is a PASSENGER airplane, and Il-112 is a transport airplane with a ramp. And “Antonov” really wanted to knock money out of the RF Ministry of Defense for the development of a ramp transporter based on the An-140, but didn’t give it a ride.
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 26 February 2016 10: 27
    +6
    Any work is better than its absence. 62 aircraft is a series. No contract? Will be. The fleet of light transporters will still have to be replaced. Dates are out.
    1. samoletil18
      samoletil18 26 February 2016 11: 21
      +1
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      The fleet of light transporters will still have to be replaced

      Yeah. Skolko An-148 and -140 released? Now, we scratch our turnips, and remembered about IL-112, -114.
      1. nov_tech.vrn
        nov_tech.vrn 26 February 2016 12: 41
        +2
        An-148 a total of 39 pieces were released, most of them in Russia, and they continue a little, this year they plan to collect 5 pieces, but this is a different size, it suits the competitors of the superjet and Pogosyan spread rot on VASO during his reign
        1. samoletil18
          samoletil18 26 February 2016 21: 02
          0
          148 to the heap dragged. An -140 so in the amount of 7 pcs. stayed?
  • Zomanus
    Zomanus 26 February 2016 10: 34
    +2
    Still to come up with a domestic engine for corn kernels,
    for small aircraft.
    And what about the topic of the article, so the first planes will work out the technology,
    and then maybe they will start offering abroad.
    1. Captain green
      Captain green 26 February 2016 12: 12
      0
      So I wanted to ask the same thing - do we have engines for these "wings"? Or did the plant remain in (in) Ukraine? Dear specialists, please clarify the question, pliiz ...
  • red joni
    red joni 26 February 2016 10: 38
    -1
    And after they raise the military transport aviation industry, let them prepare on this basis a medium-range civil transport option.
  • Zurmansor
    Zurmansor 26 February 2016 10: 41
    +3
    news, sadly, about anything. so you can write about something every day. there wasn’t even a first flight, only mockups, unfortunately. and, one asks, why rejoice? would not jinx it.
  • Yugan Oleg
    Yugan Oleg 26 February 2016 10: 57
    +1
    And what engines are going to put? The glider is beautiful, the school of Ilyushintsev is noticeable.
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 26 February 2016 11: 27
      +2
      Engines TV7-117 will be, I do not remember which letter. Already in production, in preparation. smile
      1. FID
        FID 26 February 2016 12: 20
        +3
        Quote: engineer74
        TV7-117 engines will be,

        TV7-117C ...
  • sgr291158
    sgr291158 26 February 2016 11: 06
    +1
    It’s time to reanimate your aircraft industry. How much can Western trash be bought up.
  • xam0
    xam0 26 February 2016 11: 10
    -1
    That's what you can’t take away from ours, tau is the ability to make beautiful, reliable and comfortable aircraft. This is already a school! They correctly said: a beautiful plane and flies beautifully.
  • triglav
    triglav 26 February 2016 11: 12
    -1
    A good machine should be.
  • afrikanez
    afrikanez 26 February 2016 12: 02
    +1
    An-24 was the best in the world in its class. I think the Il-112 will be a worthy successor to the traditions of Soviet and Russian aviation. And whoever is against it, let them fly on Boeings. good
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 26 February 2016 12: 23
      0
      Well, it's great that military equipment ALL should be produced by ourselves and not rely on a "good uncle" from abroad.
    2. samoletil18
      samoletil18 26 February 2016 21: 07
      0
      Quote: afrikanez
      And whoever is against it, let them fly on Boeings. good

      Something at the ticket office never asked: "What type of aircraft do you prefer?"
  • Cook
    Cook 26 February 2016 12: 31
    +2
    I don’t understand some excessive pessimism. They don't do anything - it sucks, they start to collect something - again everything is wrong. What to do then? Is our industry capable of producing the required number of long-haul aircraft to replace foreign cars in Russian airlines? Of course, let's legally prohibit the import of foreign aircraft, and we ourselves will begin to travel by train. You take a closer look at the map of Russia, estimate the size, so to speak. Why is it always negative? It is clear that one has to get out of the pit, but one must somehow be more objective and support one's own. How much mud was poured on the SSJ, and meanwhile the “ugly duckling” in the AFL chopped off a large amount of work from the Airbasov. As for the MC-21, you know, I'm not really sure that the A320 NEO and 737 MAX will be dragged in the Russian Federation now, the crisis is in our transportation at the moment. Also, let's not forget that, first of all, the largest airlines in Europe, USA, etc. will be transferred to the new generation of the aforementioned aircraft. It will take a long time to saturate their fleets with new aircraft. Look at Iran's contract with Airbas, deliveries will only begin in 2019. So there is some temporary handicap. We really need a competitive aircraft, in sufficient quantities, and with a developed system of after-sales service, and after its appearance, we can think about legislative restrictions on the purchase of foreign aircraft. Or about other preferences for aircraft manufacturers. As for the Il-112V, there is simply no other way out. An-24/26 has very short flight time left, as far as I remember their release ended in 75/86. Engines are also out of production for a very long time, only major repairs are made. This is not endless. The characteristics of the IL are quite acceptable, coupled with lower maintenance costs, I think it will be a worthy replacement for my dearly beloved Anam, which has perfectly worked out its life cycle. Regarding the lamentations about the low load, etc., then do not forget that this is a light military-technical cooperation, by the way, the internal volumes of the cargo compartment on the IL will be larger. And if you look at what the An-26 is doing in the army and in the navy, it turns out that these are mainly small groups of personnel, mail, wounded, small consignments of cargo, spare parts, etc. It's more connected than a bulk cargo plane.
  • Dimon-chik-79
    Dimon-chik-79 26 February 2016 13: 25
    0
    Wow! Let's hope that this is the first step from the next on the path to the revival of the domestic aviation industry
    1. PHANTOM-AS
      PHANTOM-AS 26 February 2016 18: 07
      0
      Quote: Dimon-chik-79
      Let's hope this is the first step of the next

      so this is not a step - it is intentions request

      Do you even learn the materiel
      Here is the first step:
      The first version of the project involved the creation of a passenger version of the aircraft. To create the IL-112, Il-Bashkiria JSC was created and the financing of the program was to be spent on the proceeds from the sale of Bashkir oil. Serial production of the aircraft was planned to be organized at Kumertau APO since 1994 (with partial re-profiling due to a decrease in the capacities involved in the production of Kamov helicopters). These plans have not been implemented.
      Here is the second step:
      Second Life. In January 2000, the design of the IL-112 began. Completion of the design was expected during 2000, but funding was not organized and work stopped. In December 2004, the aircraft layout and outline design were presented to the Russian Ministry of Defense. The aircraft was developed at its own expense KB them. S.V. Ilyushin, then the project was taken into account in the state defense order (GOZ) plan and the arms procurement program until 2015.
      Here is the third one:
      However, in August 2010, the customer of the aircraft - the Ministry of Defense of Russia - suspended funding and invited the developers (AK named after S.V. Ilyushin) to find extrabudgetary funds for the creation of four prototypes of IL-112.
      Fourth:
      In May 2011, the Russian Ministry of Defense decided to abandon the military transport version of the Il-112 and purchase 7 An-140 cargo-modified aircraft. July 20, 2011 the assembly of the first prototype of the Il-112V military transport aircraft at VASO was stopped.
      Fifth
      In 2013, the Russian Ministry of Defense changed its mind and on 20.12.2013 it was announced that in 2014 a contract would be signed with the UAC for the development of the Il-112V. Contract amount RUB 7.9 billion. Plans to purchase 62 aircraft have been announced and the first deliveries are planned for 2017. On May 14, 2015, Interfax news agency reports that a decision has been made to reduce the first order for the military transport Il-112V. Later in 2015, information about the order of 35 aircraft appeared (source). The contract was expected to be awarded in the second quarter of 2015. Deliveries are scheduled to begin in late 2018 - early 2019. (adjusted to 2019, source).
      Well, etc.
      Wide power strides wassat true?
      source: http: //militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-712.html
  • Crown
    Crown 26 February 2016 13: 47
    +1
    It is necessary to take into account the conditions under which we are starting, we just started to get out of a coma and still stick to our wheels. They didn’t have a collapse of production, they didn’t. What are we arguing about?
  • hobot
    hobot 26 February 2016 15: 27
    +1
    The news is good, hope awakens.