Military Review

The representative of the defense industry: "Doomsday aircraft" will be created on the basis of IL-96

45
The Russian 3 generation air control point will be created on the basis of the improved IL-96-400 aircraft, reports Look with reference to a representative of the United Instrument Making Corporation (DIC).




“Sketch-technical project created. We are awaiting the decision of the military authorities to continue work. In the case of a positive outcome, we will create the most modern object of this type. As the carrier will be used the modified aircraft IL-96-400 ",
said the source.

According to him, "the air control center will be able to work with all the existing and currently created advanced automated control systems of the Armed Forces of Russia."

“It is planned to install a new on-board complex of technical means on the aircraft, ensuring the formation and bringing of management teams to both modern and promising objects of the Armed Forces on the ground, sea and air echelons,” said the representative of the military-industrial complex, adding that the equipment is being created by Polyet included in the corporation.

Recall, February 21 Ministry of Defense announced the decision to order the second "Doomsday aircraft."
Photos used:
russianplanes.net
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 25 February 2016 17: 27 New
    28
    The plane is good, only God forbid that the judgment day should not come.
    1. Mengsk
      Mengsk 25 February 2016 17: 29 New
      +3
      Quote: Dimon19661
      The plane is good, only God forbid that the judgment day should not come.


      I fully support.
      1. MASK
        MASK 25 February 2016 17: 35 New
        0
        Hopefully, on this plane, there will be many different unexpected "surprises" ... Putin is happy with himself in Russian foreign policy and is still confidently behaving ..! So we have something that keeps the West from direct aggression ..
        1. cniza
          cniza 25 February 2016 17: 37 New
          +7
          Quote: MASK
          So we have something that keeps the West from direct aggression ..



          Nuclear triad.
          1. MASK
            MASK 25 February 2016 18: 05 New
            -1
            Quote: cniza
            Quote: MASK
            So we have something that keeps the West from direct aggression ..



            Nuclear triad.

            It’s all by itself .. There’s something that the West is terribly afraid of (in the USSR, various developments were underway, even Sakharov (until it was completely curled) suggested to our military that even their hair was moving on their heads.) They refused ... It seems too dangerous and difficult to control ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Tusv
          Tusv 25 February 2016 18: 09 New
          0
          Quote: MASK
          So we have something that keeps the West from direct aggression ..

          Of course there is.
          With what fright Napoleon decided that by taking Moscow he could dictate his terms to Alexander.
          And about Hitler. We get to the Volga and Stalin surrender.
          Funny, not funny. Why do all kinds of dodges have to prove in millions of lives that they are Thick as a brick.
          Drive for Perky Think like a brick
    2. Giant thought
      Giant thought 25 February 2016 17: 30 New
      +1
      The plane is reliable, let's hope that it is not needed.
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 25 February 2016 17: 42 New
        0
        Quote: Thought Giant
        The plane is reliable, let's hope that it is not needed.

        It would be better if our airlines would need wide-body IL-96-400, of course. Really reliable technology. But the situation in the world is such that the new VPU will not be superfluous.
        1. Tra-ta-ta
          Tra-ta-ta 25 February 2016 18: 12 New
          -22 qualifying.
          It would be better of course ..
          It’s also not clear: why did they choose such a large expensive aircraft ..?
          For example, Gulfstream G500:
          ceiling - 15500 m (IL-96 - 12000 m)
          range - 12500 m (.. - 12000-12800)
          speed - 950. (..- 900)
          If you wish, you can even "disguise" the strat. Bomber into it ..
          1. Ami du peuple
            Ami du peuple 25 February 2016 19: 04 New
            12
            Quote: Tra-ta-ta
            It’s also not clear: why did they choose such a large expensive aircraft ..?

            You were not there, otherwise they would have been advised: "Oh-oh, expensive plane, you can't get enough kerosene." Don't you take into account many tons of equipment? Your business jet has a cargo capacity of 3 tons and a capacity of 19 passengers. Awesome air command post, what. Plus, it's American made.
            1. Tra-ta-ta
              Tra-ta-ta 25 February 2016 22: 48 New
              +1
              Well, create nano-equipment !! We pay you for this s / n ...
              Ato it seems that in addition to the equipment you plan to launch all the generals there ...
              1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Seal
            Seal 25 February 2016 19: 43 New
            +3
            You can stuff so much of all sorts of crap into this one that if it then, while flying over the North Pole, turns on some "crap", the Americans and Japanese will even turn off their electronic flush cisterns in toilets. And blacks in Nigeria will admire the polar lights for the first time in their lives wink
            Again, reliable - like a steam locomotive. There was a case in the Far East, when another snow cyclone came there, the flights were canceled. But the strip was cleaned. Then they stopped cleaning. All "foreign cars" - stand, do not rock the boat. But December 31, full of business travelers from Moscow. Who, of course, would like to celebrate the New Year at home. In short, they talked the pilot out. Let's go look for someone to clear the strip again. But the pilot expressed himself in Russian in the sense that there is no need to waste precious time on this. Otherwise he will not make it to Moscow before the New Year. In short, it took off. On the uncleared runway.
            1. aleks 62 next
              aleks 62 next 26 February 2016 09: 38 New
              +1
              .... But the pilot put it in Russian in the sense that it is not necessary to spend precious time on this. And then he will not have time in Moscow before the New Year. In short - took off. On an uncleared runway ....

              .... And after that, the RP (flight manager), take-off manager - landing, etc. safely landed .... laughing ..... Do not bring nonsense to people .... The plane is not a steam locomotive ... hi
              1. Seal
                Seal 28 February 2016 00: 02 New
                0
                Don't worry don't put wink
          3. ferdiperdozzz
            ferdiperdozzz 25 February 2016 22: 04 New
            +4
            You are an aviation expert. Congratulations.
      2. gjv
        gjv 25 February 2016 18: 18 New
        +6
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Reliable aircraft

        The Il-96-400 aircraft is a deep modernization of the Il-96-300 with PS-90A-1 engines with a thrust of 17 kgf and improved avionics. The fuselage was "borrowed" from the IL-400M. The maximum take-off weight is 96 tons, the payload is 270 tons. Maximum passenger capacity - 58 people. The maximum flight range is 435 km.
        In the photo in the article Il-96-400 RA-96104, which belonged to the Border Guard Service of the Russian Federation, has been in operation since 2009, although in reality the first flight took place at the end of 2011. Currently, conversion to the IL-96-400VPU version is underway.

        Voronezh - Pridacha airdrome (VASO) (UUOD), November 17, 2011


        Originally built for Atlant-Soyuz AK, then they wanted to lease AK Flight. Due to financial circumstances, no company was able to start operation. In 2014, converted for the FPS. Then an antenna fairing appeared in front of the keel. By the way, it will be small. The photo below shows that the RA-96023 Il-96-300PU antenna cowl is much larger. Apparently, the IL-96-400VPU will also be redone for a larger number of antennas.


        Extremely famous photo: Voronezh - Pridacha airdrome (VASO) (UUOD), November 2015
        1. FID
          FID 25 February 2016 18: 26 New
          +2
          Well, you are wrong a / c Flight 2 years flew very well on 400 ... Here, given in your example 96104 in the "livery" of Flight ...
          1. gjv
            gjv 25 February 2016 20: 49 New
            +3
            Quote: SSI
            Well, you are wrong a / c. Flight 2years flew very well on 400-kah ...

            Well, you're wrong, Sergey Ivanovich hi . Yes, AK Polet operated flights on the IL-96-400T. One small detail - there were three of these birds, and all of them were named.

            "Vyacheslav Salikov", RA-96101, in AK Polet from 2009 to 2013, average flight hours 12 hours per month


            "Valery Menitsky", RA-96102, in AK Polet from 2009 to 2013, an average flight time of 51 hours per month


            "Stanislav Bliznyuk", RA-96103, in AK Polet from 2009 to 2013, an average flight time of 75 hours per month

            AC Polet received them under a lease agreement from Ilyushin Finance Co and in 2013 they were returned to VASO.
            And the RA-96104 board was completed only in 2011. Yes, it flew to VASO in the "livery" of Flight, however, it was never put into operation, but remained in storage at VASO. request That’s why I didn’t receive a personal profit.

            However, I am also wrong. Only a few in the other. The RA-2015 shown in the 96104 photo is the final version of the Il-96-400VPU specifically for the FSB (including the antenna radome, which is small), i.e. "old". And the article - it turns out - is about another plane, which does not exist yet. It's just that OPK is boasting about the development of a new set of equipment. And where this equipment will go - only assumptions. M. b. one of the former Poletovsky boards will be reconstructed. Although there seemed to be other plans about them - conversion into passenger ones for Cubana. request
            Or maybe a miracle will happen - finally they will complete the RA-96105.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Michael67
      Michael67 25 February 2016 17: 30 New
      0
      Sheathing him composite "invisible". Like the PAK FA.
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 25 February 2016 17: 39 New
        0
        Quote: Michael67
        Sheathing him composite "invisible". Like the PAK FA.

        How do you imagine this? Open the hatch and immediately see, but here is the full spectrum of all kinds of radiation. Such aircraft will never remain unattended
      2. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 25 February 2016 17: 39 New
        +1
        Quote: Michael67
        Sheathing him composite "invisible". Like the PAK FA.

        What for? In any case, it will be tightly covered by ground air defense and escort fighters. A waste of money, this composite "invisible" for such a board.
    5. Denis Skiff
      Denis Skiff 25 February 2016 17: 49 New
      0
      deferred. in our power.
    6. Tor5
      Tor5 25 February 2016 18: 21 New
      0
      I want to believe that he will show his qualities only in exercises.
    7. samoletil18
      samoletil18 25 February 2016 21: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: Dimon19661
      The plane is good, only God forbid that the judgment day should not come.

      But for such a day, 4 engines are better than 2 even from a dreamliner.
  2. sir_obs
    sir_obs 25 February 2016 17: 27 New
    +2
    Doomsday is when everyone will have to ship a ship? Cogla already get rid of these Hollywood cliches, why do we have so poor language?
    1. SkiF_RnD
      SkiF_RnD 25 February 2016 17: 30 New
      +3
      Judgment Day is a Christian concept, not a Hollywood stamp.
      1. sir_obs
        sir_obs 25 February 2016 17: 32 New
        +4
        The concept in Christianity implies God's judgment, and not a nuclear catastrophe provoked by nerds, which they began to call in everyday life the day of judgment upon the filing of Hollywood idiots
        1. Boos
          Boos 25 February 2016 17: 49 New
          +1
          Ragnarok is more about the topic, the pre-Christian epic is more true than the bible.
    2. tol100v
      tol100v 25 February 2016 17: 44 New
      +4
      Quote: sir_obs
      why is our language so impoverished?

      Our language has not become scarce, but we have a framework of decency! Everything that the "Doomsday plane" carries with it can be expressed in one Russian word: P..dts! Briefly and clearly.
    3. Darth Revan
      Darth Revan 25 February 2016 21: 09 New
      -1
      It is possible otherwise - Exterminatus.
  3. Tusv
    Tusv 25 February 2016 17: 30 New
    0
    God forbid to drink krovushki overseas Fenders
  4. triglav
    triglav 25 February 2016 17: 32 New
    0
    Airplane "I can see everything from above." This name will be better.
  5. Zheleznyak
    Zheleznyak 25 February 2016 17: 37 New
    +2
    Our plane is called "air control point (VPC) for special purposes." A car with a similar purpose is called in the United States "the Doomsday plane."
    "Doomsday" will come for the USA .. If it comes to that, then for us it will become a day of special significance ...
    I still have the confidence that the Anglo-Saxons will delve into the meaning of the name of their aircraft and get out of Ukraine and the Middle East ... There is no need for a re-enactment.
    Doomsday comes, so and so for everyone, and this is enough to live in accordance with the knowledge of this fact.
  6. Paul_
    Paul_ 25 February 2016 17: 37 New
    0
    Big name, I hope we never see this "Doomsday"
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 25 February 2016 22: 41 New
      +1
      Quote: Paul_
      Big name, I hope we never see this "Doomsday"

      no, we won't see, "Perimeter" will suit him when it’s already on the drum ...
  7. Michael67
    Michael67 25 February 2016 17: 46 New
    +4
    Quote: MASK
    Hopefully, on this plane, there will be many different unexpected "surprises" ... Putin is happy with himself in Russian foreign policy and is still confidently behaving ..! So we have something that keeps the West from direct aggression ..

    Something like that ... We have a nuclear club. That's what.
    And Vladimir Vladimirovich said straight from the screen: “We have something to pleasantly surprise our partners with.” He spoke of the variants of a direct armed conflict between the Russian Federation and its "partners".
  8. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 25 February 2016 17: 54 New
    0
    [I]
    Quote: sir_obs
    Doomsday is when everyone will have to ship a ship? Cogla already get rid of these Hollywood cliches, why do we have so poor language?
    [/ i
    I think you are wrong about the ship. It is "when" that neither we nor they will need the ship, alas. Neither We nor they will even say, even if we want: "Peace be upon him." Something like this, and let Hollywood rest - peace be upon him.
  9. FIREMAN
    FIREMAN 25 February 2016 18: 05 New
    +5
    Armed forces of land, sea and air echelons

    I hope soon another train will appear - the railway!
  10. serezhasoldatow
    serezhasoldatow 25 February 2016 18: 08 New
    +1
    Well, the "nuclear suitcase" flying will turn out!
  11. FID
    FID 25 February 2016 18: 12 New
    +5
    There was a / c Polet, she carried cargo ... She had 4 Il-96-400 (trucks), built a fifth plane for them in Voronezh, they flew around the world, twice a week Munich-Shanghai (Hamburg-Shanghai) But here's the bad luck, in our country AirBridge Cargo is also engaged in cargo transportation - Aeroflot's daughter, flies on the B-747 Freiter ... Guess three times what happened to the Polet airline? 96105 (the fifth side, ready) was dismantled, and the rest were offered to the military ... 96104 and 96102 were converted into "salons", 96101 portrayed a refueller, and from 96103, obviously, they would make a VPU ... No more Il-96-400, which is a pity ...
    1. MASK
      MASK 25 February 2016 18: 20 New
      -1
      Quote: SSI
      There was a / c Polet, she carried cargo ... She had 4 Il-96-400 (trucks), built a fifth plane for them in Voronezh, they flew around the world, twice a week Munich-Shanghai (Hamburg-Shanghai) But here's the bad luck, in our country AirBridge Cargo is also engaged in cargo transportation - Aeroflot's daughter, flies on the B-747 Freiter ... Guess three times what happened to the Polet airline? 96105 (the fifth side, ready) was dismantled, and the rest were offered to the military ... 96104 and 96102 were converted into "salons", 96101 portrayed a refueller, and from 96103, obviously, they would make a VPU ... No more Il-96-400, which is a pity ...

      So everything was gone again .... sorry! And we hoped and believed ... (that the bells will ring again)))
  12. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 25 February 2016 18: 15 New
    0
    It was necessary to make such a "birdie" on the basis of that 95.
  13. fa2998
    fa2998 25 February 2016 18: 24 New
    +2
    Quote: Thought Giant
    The plane is reliable, let's hope that it is not needed.

    Yes, the state invested billions in the creation of the Il-86, and its modification of the Il-96. And only to make a few pieces for the presidential administration, and now "Doomsday". Some kind of exclusive. Remember for which president they made a special plane. All fly on serial aircraft, naturally equipped. hi
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 25 February 2016 22: 44 New
      +1
      Quote: fa2998
      Everyone flies on production aircraft, naturally equipped

      the Yankees Board No. 1 also has one name, there is only a fuselage from the serial, everything else is on order and under close supervision, God forbid that ...
  14. xam0
    xam0 25 February 2016 18: 45 New
    +3
    At one time, our designers put such a huge reserve into it that even now the glider is relevant, and with the new engines it’s a song in general. Still in civil aviation such, replacing all imported with your own, in general it would be great.
  15. arnulla
    arnulla 25 February 2016 18: 47 New
    +1
    He would have two more engines instead of four, you see, and civilian companies, they would have begun to buy. Well, at least they would have ours. But it seems that we do not have such engines.
  16. Santjaga_Garka
    Santjaga_Garka 25 February 2016 19: 02 New
    +1
    Cool news - this is where OUR "John Connor" will sit *)
  17. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 25 February 2016 20: 25 New
    +2
    While in Moscow there will be people like shuvalov, manturov, dvorkovich, siluanov, ulyukaev, naebulin, and the like a shusher, we will soon have nothing at all.
  18. In100gram
    In100gram 25 February 2016 20: 25 New
    0
    Quote: Michael67
    Sheathing him composite "invisible". Like the PAK FA.


    It is assumed that he will fly over his territory. Why such excesses? More important is the reliability and lifting capacity of tons of equipment. One way or another the cover will be anyway.
  19. stonks
    stonks 25 February 2016 21: 15 New
    -2
    I do not understand the need to have such a CPSU.
    There is also an automated control system for strategic missile launches in the event of this very "ship". And the command for a global launch will be given not by a MAN with the All-Union Communist Party, but by an automatic machine from launched missiles.
    This was in the open press. But I don’t remember the name of this “dead hand” system ...
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 25 February 2016 23: 27 New
      0
      This aircraft will be part of a guaranteed retaliatory strike system! Extra special communication channels in this case will not hurt.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  20. Zomanus
    Zomanus 26 February 2016 05: 02 New
    0
    Useful thing. At least in terms of accumulating experience in the construction of mobile control systems.
    Still to learn to launch microsatellites from such an aircraft.
    Well, I cleanly worked a couple of days and died.