
In bookstores you can find a lot of works that evaluate the activities of Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin from the positive side, debunk the most diverse “black myths” created about him and his era. Here and a series of books by A. B. Martirosyan "200 myths about Stalin", and very fundamental works of Yuri Mukhin ("The murder of Stalin and Beria", "What is Stalin killed for?", Etc.), the work of V. Karpov "Generalissimo" and many others. others. In recent years, the image of Stalin is increasingly seen on posters, public and private transport, etc. A real shock for many people who believed that Russia was already thoroughly desovetizirovana and detalinizirovana, were the results of the project "Name of Russia", when Stalin almost won a victory. And this is after the period of “perestroika” and 90's, when he was declared a real “bloody monster”, guilty of almost all the troubles of Russia and its peoples.
Stalin, Stalinism firmly entered people's memory, and now not only older people, but also young people are positively thinking about him. For them, the era of Stalin is the time of great victories, achievements, the period of the highest power of the USSR-Russia in the world. And the time of Gorbachev and Yeltsin was the epoch of the destruction of a great power, which maintained stability on the planet, the time of the destruction of almost all the great achievements of the Soviet Union.
“Perestroika” and “reformers” needed to convince the population that the Soviet period, and especially Stalin's time, was “lost” for Russia and its people. They say there is nothing to regret about him, there were only repressions, terror, “cleansing”, millions of vain victims, an exorbitantly high price for the victory in the Great Patriotic War, an “iron curtain”, a shortage of sausage, etc. In their opinion, it was Stalin who was to blame that Russia was separated from the "world community", advanced centers of culture.
Initially, the majority of the population took these “exposures” with interest. But soon works began to appear that, on the basis of facts, figures, proved that anti-Stalinist accusations were often nothing more than bad fiction or fulfillment of a certain social order. Thus, during the years of the “purges” of 1937-1938, for which Stalin was especially hated, the “fifth column” was eliminated; the Germans themselves actually recognized this fact later. The “Trotskyists”, who were destroyed or camped, were the legacy of the dim era of the revolution and civil war period, and they and their owners were not happy about the restoration of the power of Russia-USSR. There is no doubt that Tukhachevsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev, Yagoda-Yehuda and other similar "comrades" were enemies of the USSR and its people.
It was under Stalin that the country was raised from the ruins, prepared for a terrible war of survival, won it and was able to recover so quickly, accelerating for a dash into the future, in the 21 century, that the whole world was simply shocked. The Stalinist system won the most effective system of the West - the dark genius of the Third Reich. Under him, the foundations were laid for the best education system in the world. People believed in a bright future, about the time when there would be no crime (just remember the images of the film “The Meeting Place cannot be changed”, read the Weiner Brothers novel “The Age of Mercy”) and other public vices.
In 1990, the country experienced such a pogrom, which could not be arranged by the hordes of Hitler. Without war, agriculture and industry were destroyed, millions of people died. These facts unwittingly began to lead people to the idea that in Stalin's “damned era” life was better. The country then quickly grew stronger, its scientific, educational, industrial and military potential grew at an unprecedented rate.
Stalin's personality provoked respect in people - he really worked like a “slave in galleys,” according to 14-16 hours a day, he knew how to choose associates for top government posts, did not think about honors, bank accounts, lived modestly.
And everyone saw the result of his activities as a “leader”. Hundreds, thousands of schools and resorts, libraries, museums, houses of creativity, stadiums, factories, power stations, roads were built and opened. He returned a number of territories that our empire lost during the collapse of the Russian empire. And "perestroika" gave without a fight, war "the mother of Russian cities" - Kiev, "the city of Russian glory" - Sevastopol, White Russia. For a single moment, in terms of stories, The “democratizers” tore the great power into specific khanates and princedoms, which the Russian princes, kings, generals, simple warriors, and laborers built for centuries. With one stroke of the pen 8 December 1991, the “glorious sons of the Fatherland” - Boris Yeltsin and Gennady Burbulis (RSFSR), Stanislav Shushkevich and Vyacheslav Kebich (Byelorussian SSR), Leonid Kravchuk and Witold Fokin (Ukrainian SSR) - destroyed a shield and Rahman fighter, he was destroyed by a number of pellies, hepherdians, hepherd watered with the blood of our ancestors. Only in the Great Patriotic War, our civilization lost 27 millions of sons and daughters. Russia was rejected territorially almost in the 17 century.
The heyday of "democracy" according to the Western model led to the collapse of science and education, the degradation of culture and its replacement by surrogates for world pop culture, a difficult situation in medicine. The army of the Russian Federation with great difficulty was able to put out the flames of the Chechen war, although not long ago the Soviet Army was the most powerful force on the planet.
As a result, it was liberals, democrats, desovetizers who were credited with reviving Stalin. They did everything themselves so that the Russian people would not forget it. And even more than that, by their monstrous theft, rampant lawlessness and corruption, "optimization" of basic social systems, the democrats by constant lies have achieved that Russia, the Russian people, figuratively speaking, are now "pregnant with Stalin." For many ordinary citizens, such a person at the head of Russia would have gotten rid of the nightmare of the last 20 years, when the great civilization robbed by the “reformers” found itself on the backyards of the world (when in a country like Qatar, its ambassador was simply beaten) war and dismemberment. That is why, if Vladimir Putin begins to pursue a policy of nationalizing the country's most important industries, restoring the model of a socialist state, clearing the most odious individuals during the period of the domination of liberals, oligarchy, he will meet with massive popular support.