Military Review

Parts of the SSA do not want to negotiate with Damascus without the participation of Jebhat al-Nusra

25
Lebanese TV channel Al-Mayadin cites the statement of one of the representatives of the command of the so-called "Syrian Free Army" (FSA). This person claims that the individual SSA compounds do not agree that representatives of Dzhebhat an-Nusra will not be allowed to enter the political settlement process in Syria. According to the interlocutor of Lebanese journalists, part of the SSA is not ready to lay down weapons and to start the negotiation process precisely because the truce does not affect the "Al-Nusra Front" (for reference: "The Al-Nusra Front" is a group recognized as a terrorist UN Security Council).


Parts of the SSA do not want to negotiate with Damascus without the participation of Jebhat al-Nusra


RIA News cites the translation of the statement by the representative of the SSA command, which, as it turns out, also belongs to one of the most radical Syrian groups - Ahrar al-Sham, which has direct contacts with the Jebhat al-Nusra militants:

Several brigades belonging to the PAS declared that they would not join the truce if it does not apply to Dzhebhat an-Nusra in Syria. There will be no truce without Dzhebhat an-Nusra.


It is strange why Dzhebhat an Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham did not express such an active desire to participate in the process of normalizing the situation in Syria before the start of the counter-terrorist operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces and before the Syrian army and the Kurdish militia cut off the main supply channels from Turkey? .

The interlocutor of the Al-Mayadin TV channel would like to convey important information for him: the Russian bombers are not going to ask for a negotiation process ... And no one will offer twice. If CCA has no desire to negotiate with people, then KABs, OFABs and other weighty “negotiators” will enter into the conversation.
Photos used:
news.vice.com
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Darkmor
    Darkmor 24 February 2016 12: 54
    16
    Well, then we will reduce the number of negotiators, and those who remain will be more accommodating :)
    1. vodolaz
      vodolaz 24 February 2016 12: 57
      11
      Well, everything is very simple: who does not want a truce, he will receive OFAB on his own head)
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 24 February 2016 13: 00
        12
        Several brigades belonging to the PAS declared that they would not join the truce if it does not apply to Dzhebhat an-Nusra in Syria. There will be no truce without Dzhebhat an-Nusra.

        It means that there can’t be any talk to the ground, it can also be sent to the resort.
        1. Pravdarm
          Pravdarm 24 February 2016 13: 01
          +6
          I repeat: "Let them rest from this thought in the sun! PYOKE!"
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. gergi
        gergi 24 February 2016 13: 14
        0
        No one doubted that it would be so. Those who do not want to talk will be silent forever.
    2. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 24 February 2016 12: 58
      +7
      Quote: Darkmor
      Well, then we will reduce the number of negotiators

      Indeed, this oriental bazaar should be thinned out. "Separate parts of the SSA", yeah. To put it bluntly, every illiterate Kurbanbashi with a couple of dozen subordinate stubs and having a "roof" - distant relatives in some London or Paris, considers himself to be a significant political force. Moreover, a force capable of dictating its terms to the UN.
      So what the hell with the beach, sucks! Otherwise, a meeting with the gurus will happen quickly and inevitably.
    3. cniza
      cniza 24 February 2016 12: 58
      +3
      Quote: Darkmor
      Well, then we will reduce the number of negotiators, and those who remain will be more accommodating :)


      But they don’t seem to understand this. They will clearly explain personally.
    4. rpek32
      rpek32 24 February 2016 13: 23
      0
      then they’ll be killed. lol
    5. sherp2015
      sherp2015 24 February 2016 19: 33
      0
      Quote: Darkmor
      then we will reduce the number of negotiators, and those who remain will be more accommodating :)


      Parts of the SSA do not want to negotiate with Damascus without the participation of Jebhat al-Nusra


      )))) Who will be worse? Well then, according to the principle "who did not hide, I am not to blame ..."
  2. kapitan92
    kapitan92 24 February 2016 12: 57
    +8
    "..... And no one will offer twice." ..... "Cut to hell, without waiting for peritonitis!" (Film "Pokrovskie Vorota")
    1. Freelancer7
      Freelancer7 24 February 2016 14: 42
      0
      Kohl top big faces
      Didn’t find a reason for the world,
      Could not agree
      So I'm the last argument.
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 24 February 2016 12: 58
    +8
    individual CCA compounds disagree

    Consequently, they support terrorists and automatically fall under the continuation of strikes.
  4. alex-cn
    alex-cn 24 February 2016 12: 59
    +1
    Such "tricky tails" will substitute the whole negotiation process. Who knows, despite the cries of the West, maybe for the best ...
  5. Masya masya
    Masya masya 24 February 2016 13: 03
    10
    "The Syrian government will regard the groups that did not support the ceasefire as terrorist, according to local media, citing an official source in the Syrian Foreign Ministry."

    Original news RT in Russian:
    https://russian.rt.com/article/150368
    So to speak, the grain is separated from the chaff ...
  6. Stinger
    Stinger 24 February 2016 13: 06
    0
    It's good. They themselves decided on the orientation. Whoever doesn’t hide is to blame.
  7. Hooks
    Hooks 24 February 2016 13: 06
    +1
    They do not want to talk with Damascus, so let them communicate with the Iblis, what problems !? The task is only to expedite this contractual process as much as possible.
  8. square
    square 24 February 2016 13: 06
    0
    Then the negotiations will be conducted by the Russian Aerospace Forces, in the only language that is understandable to you.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 24 February 2016 13: 10
      +3
      All who are fighting against Assad and the people of Syria are enemies and if they do not "think" in the near future and do not go over to his side, it is not worthwhile to really understand the varieties of this "G" and it is necessary to "jam" them indiscriminately.
  9. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 24 February 2016 13: 09
    +5
    IMHO, Putin was counting on this. That the "moderate" opposition will show itself in this way, and it will be possible to smear all the barmaley across the Syrian desert, not taking into account the diversity of flags and stickers that they cling to. Having done well and "partners" who "save face" literally.
  10. meriem1
    meriem1 24 February 2016 13: 19
    +2
    The fewer negotiators ..with their crooked conditions, the cleaner the WORLD will be in Syria !!! Who would scream there, but not to them! Again claim? They do not want to talk, let them go and dig their graves !!!
  11. serezhasoldatow
    serezhasoldatow 24 February 2016 13: 20
    +1
    You do not want a ceasefire? Then we fly to you !!!
  12. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 24 February 2016 13: 21
    +1
    It’s necessary to bring them down and that’s it, look, they do not agree.
  13. Wolka
    Wolka 24 February 2016 13: 23
    +2
    disagree, then in manure, no third is given ...
  14. Great-grandfather of Zeus
    Great-grandfather of Zeus 24 February 2016 13: 26
    +1
    Well, let these individuals prepare for the meeting with the Shaitans, if they do not want to lay down their arms and enter into negotiations. ..
  15. pimen
    pimen 24 February 2016 13: 31
    +1
    here we never need peace talks there. Why bother?
  16. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 24 February 2016 13: 55
    0
    The second part of the Marlezon Ballet in action. Minsk rake-2.
  17. valent45
    valent45 24 February 2016 14: 30
    0
    After February 27th, all who resist will simply be destroyed.
    This is the logic of the agreements. Although the West is already thinking that the situation may go
    in a different way from the agreements, so now there is already a throw-in about a certain plan B.
    Although Plan A has not yet begun. Wait and see how things go on.
  18. afrikanez
    afrikanez 24 February 2016 14: 53
    0
    Damn and these (I don’t even know what to call them) set the conditions. Yes, all of you, it’s time to destroy the hell, but they all blather. angry
  19. The Sparkle
    The Sparkle 24 February 2016 15: 29
    0
    The Armistice Treaty is an ultimatum to all bandits in Syria.
    In relation to the igil and jabhat an-nusra groups, this treaty is not valid, they will continue to be destroyed.
    Whoever disagrees with this will also be destroyed!
    SSA is looking for a problem?)))
  20. Andrew81183
    Andrew81183 24 February 2016 16: 05
    +1
    As from the movie brother "life hangs on a thread, and he thinks about profit"
  21. koralvit
    koralvit 24 February 2016 16: 53
    0
    The opposition, this is called only because it is ready to resolve all internal disagreements with the government through negotiations. And whoever wants to by armed means is terrorists.
  22. Ros 56
    Ros 56 24 February 2016 17: 18
    0
    They do not want to communicate with people, they will communicate with bombs and shells. The fewer people in the negotiations, the more successful the negotiations. Remember Yalta 45, only three negotiators, but how much was enough.
  23. 8140
    8140 24 February 2016 22: 27
    0
    [quote = CERHJ] [quote = Jaromere.
    There is not yet another "brilliant plan" of Putin ... We were pressed by Turkey into a stupid one!Here is a map showing the placement of the 100th Turks’ corps prepared for the invasion of Syria. We tried in vain through the UN to adopt a resolution on Turkey and Syria urgently. The clock was on. And then in case of an invasion, our whole game broke down. We warned that in case of defeat Our troops (VKS, advisers) can use tactical nuclear weapons. In this situation, Article 5 of the NATO Charter on collective security does not work. the Turks themselves become aggressors automatically. But it’s easier for us not to become. because we don’t forgive the use of nuclear weapons. Again, new sanctions. Again from scratch, start in Syria .. so we just decided not to risk it yet. It may be morally and technically not ready. [/ quote]

    As I agree with you. Now we do not have the strength and means 1: 1 (without nuclear weapons) to oppose Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar without receiving unacceptable damage to Russia. A forced truce. I am very worried about our AVOS. I would really like to know who these our analyst advisers are. Who is involved in our foreign policy line leading to pros .. ru of Ukraine and the loss of face in the Syrian conflict. The names of these report writers are probably well known, maybe some of the comrades are double.
    The masses may scream wildly cheers, but if you look closely, it’s not at all a rainbow-colored atmosphere. And these are all the results of 5-7 years of relaxation and smacking in foreign policy.
    I completely agree that the one who does nothing is not mistaken, but at the same time, since the time of Medvedev I have never heard an admission of error. Only for recognition is there a correction.