Military Review

Media: Beijing has deployed military aircraft on the disputed island

32
The Chinese military department sent its fighters to the controversial Woody Island in the South China Sea, reports RIA News Fox News post.


Media: Beijing has deployed military aircraft on the disputed island


Earlier on the same island anti-aircraft complexes were located.

“Chinese fighters like Shenyang J-11 and Xian JH-7 have been spotted by American intelligence on Woody Island (Yunsindao - whale) in the last few days,” the channel said.

Fox News last week reported that "China has deployed several HQ-9 anti-aircraft missile systems on Woody Island, which is one of the controversial Paracel Islands (Xisha - China) in the South China Sea."

This information was later confirmed by the US and Taiwan military departments. Beijing, in turn, reacted calmly to this message - it did not confirm or deny. He only noted that “he has the full right to deploy defense infrastructure on his territory”.
Photos used:
AFP 2016 / Str
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Michael67
    Michael67 24 February 2016 12: 15
    +8
    Well done, our partners from the Middle Kingdom. All nerves to pinch nerves. How much foam will flow out of the State Department? ... it's scary to imagine. The Chinese were offended that they were not the first in the list of dangers among the openers.
    1. Temples
      Temples 24 February 2016 12: 18
      +7
      So they built an airfield.
      So the builders are working.
      Housing for the military five must be built.
      Come out, they live there.
      Who lives that and the island.
      So there is no reason to argue.
      1. Samen
        Samen 24 February 2016 12: 20
        +7
        They squeeze out the "applicants" quietly. For one striped squeeze out of the region! Well done!
        1. cniza
          cniza 24 February 2016 12: 22
          +6
          They begin to be smeared, and the layer turns out thinner and thinner.
          1. Pravdarm
            Pravdarm 24 February 2016 12: 26
            12
            China is like that Vaska: "He listens, but eats!" Gaining mass! And fuck all the squeals! And if something happens, they won't go to Minsk or some Brussels to negotiate a ceasefire! They clearly demonstrate this, warn! That's how it should be! Without companionship!
            1. Ami du peuple
              Ami du peuple 24 February 2016 12: 42
              +4
              Quote: Pravdarm
              That's how it should be! Without coping

              Yeah, only the main Chinese rivals on the disputed islands are the Philippines, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei. Whom do not take - right the greatest military powers. Now compare with our current confrontation between NATO and the United States.
              Russia depressed Crimea, two years ago, if forgotten. And without co-ownership, by the way .. Let me remind you: the entire land area of ​​the Spratly archipelago is 5 sq. Km, Crimea - 27 thousand sq. Km. The difference is more than 5 thousand times. yes How do you say there? "That's how it should be!"
              PS By the way, the Chinese can not afford to return Taiwan - the gut is thin.
              1. Karlovar
                Karlovar 24 February 2016 17: 21
                +1
                Taiwan is de facto (economically) already connected to the PRC ... De jure will happen in 10-15 years ... And the Chinese know how to wait ...
                1. sherp2015
                  sherp2015 24 February 2016 20: 20
                  0
                  Quote: Karlovar
                  .. De jure will happen in 10-15 years ... But the Chinese know how to wait ...


                  Yeah...
                  "If you wait a long time, then someday the corpse of your enemy will float by ..."))
            2. GSH-18
              GSH-18 24 February 2016 13: 17
              +1
              Quote: Pravdarm
              Obviously demonstrate, warn! That's how it should be! Without coping

              About "companionship", sorry, who do you mean? Hopefully not Russia?
            3. Talgat
              Talgat 24 February 2016 18: 07
              +2
              Quote: Pravdarm
              Do not go to negotiate a ceasefire! Obviously demonstrate, warn! That's how it should be! Without coping


              I do not argue, China openly shows its position with all its actions

              And the support of Russia on all foreign policy fronts (as they wrote a lot - in the UN, China and Russia simply agree on positions and always act from the same position) and the confrontation with Yapy and the USA in the Far East

              But in reality - as in chess - the queen never goes on the attack first

              Yes, in the 21 century, it seems that China will be the main enemy of the West - t to no USSR

              But so far, the first blow is still being held by Syria and Iran - without "concomitance"
              Behind them, under a second blow, Russia and Eurasia (if we lose Iran, they will come to us)

              China is still gaining strength, growling. supports both Russia and Iran with Syria, and the Bolivarians - but his open confrontation is yet to come. So he is preparing the rear from the north and west.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. captain
          captain 24 February 2016 13: 18
          +1
          China has resolved the issue by right of the strong. As we say; who first got up, that and slippers.
        4. NORILCHANIN
          NORILCHANIN 24 February 2016 20: 15
          +1
          In this way, the Chinese Russians will squeeze out from the Far East in a quiet.
    2. vovanpain
      vovanpain 24 February 2016 12: 19
      13
      Beijing, in turn, reacted to this message calmly - did not confirm or deny. He only noted that "he has every right to deploy defense infrastructure on his territory."

      China is doing its job calmly and not disgustingly. repeat
      1. cniza
        cniza 24 February 2016 12: 21
        +3
        The US is starting to rush, well, where to run?
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. vodolaz
      vodolaz 24 February 2016 12: 35
      +2
      Airplanes are also infrastructure. And they wanted to spit on the opinion of the United States and its henchmen.
    4. Kibalchish
      Kibalchish 24 February 2016 12: 40
      +1
      Quote: Michael67
      Well done, our partners from the Middle Kingdom. All nerves to pinch nerves. How much foam will flow out of the State Department? ... it's scary to imagine. The Chinese were offended that they were not the first in the list of dangers among the openers.


      Two questions.

      Nothing that he pinches nerves to our ally Vietnam, to whom this island belonged before?

      Where does NATO come from in the Pacific?
      1. Talgat
        Talgat 24 February 2016 18: 10
        0
        Yes, Vietnam is a historical ally of the USSR

        I think this is a headache and the task of Russian diplomacy - to reconcile China and Vietnam - to prevent the United States from including Vietnam in its bloc

        Therefore, the supply of weapons - I'm sure. that China is only glad that Vietnam buys in Russia - t tomorrow it is dependent on the Russian Federation for service and spare parts, etc.

        But if Vietnam starts buying everything in the west - that's it - moving to the opposite camp
        1. Kasym
          Kasym 24 February 2016 18: 45
          +1
          China stepped up on the bulk islands after the United States showed several times that it could block the Strait of Malacca (it is on a par with the Suez Canal), the passage between the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Much depends on this strait for transport links in China. Therefore, I believe that this is the answer of China - it would be strange if Beijing raised its hands. And now this region of the USA is being made a priority for itself. And they will surely militarize Southeast Asia, and put the sticks in the wheels of the Chinese.
          And also Beijing took seriously the Silk Road and the Northern Sea Corridor (they had already escorted ships along it) as an alternative. Few US problems in BV, Afghanistan, North. Africa, DPRK and Ukraine; so even with the PRC they decided to play around - the navel will not be untied from such "stretching" !? The EU has already shown its interests in Asia when it joined the Asian Investment Infrastructure Bank (AIIB). Is the US not afraid to be left without its Eurosatellites? hi
          1. Talgat
            Talgat 24 February 2016 19: 07
            0
            Quote: Kasym
            Few US problems in BV, Afghanistan, North. Africa, DPRK and Ukraine; so even with the PRC they decided to play around - the navel will not be untied from such "stretching" !?


            I’m also thinking about this recently Kasim.

            On the one hand, everything is clear - the GDP and the US military budget are above all limits - almost equal to the indicators of the rest of the world together - the new Rome and the World Ruler seem to print as many unsecured dollars as they like and easily set gold prices for gold, etc.

            On the other hand, their GDP is inflated, resold paper loans to each other - that's the GDP

            That is reality. it’s not from the Internet and dollars - but from cast iron steel, etc., and the population, from living people who are ready to pick up Kalash

            using financial fraud, the United States and the West can accumulate expensive high-tech - but you won’t win war technologies alone - especially since Russia and China are also developing them

            In general, Americans are not as strong as it seems at first glance. The real economies of China and Russia (and especially if we restore the Eurasian Union as a single market) can also "untie the navel" "to the aggressors
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 24 February 2016 12: 21
    +2
    So they are not afraid of the storm? The Chinese Drakosha showed his teeth a little! To spite the "white monkeys" from across the ocean.
    In general, whites in China are not liked because of the word "absolutely". We are all Lao Vai for them. But the Chinese are pragmatic and not fussy ...
  3. Gomunkul
    Gomunkul 24 February 2016 12: 22
    +1
    Media: Beijing has deployed military aircraft on the disputed island
    If there is an airfield, then there should be airplanes on it, what is the sensation?
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 24 February 2016 12: 25
    +1
    The Chinese have long understood that in order to defend something, the political will of the leadership and the strength of the NAC are necessary. Now let others scratch their turnips.
  5. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 24 February 2016 12: 28
    0
    And the places there are beautiful judging by the photo.
  6. DimYang
    DimYang 24 February 2016 12: 29
    0
    That's the way to do it. Put before the fact. You cannot refuse the sequence to the Chinese.
    1. Nosgoth
      Nosgoth 24 February 2016 15: 22
      -3
      Well, the Yankees do the same. Where are your praises for their success?
      The islands are "controversial" and not Chinese, when China would return its own, and not squeeze, so to speak, "common shared property." For example, how one of the residents of the staircase on the floor would have squeezed the entire corridor on the floor for himself, spitting on the others. Is it fair?
  7. Pvi1206
    Pvi1206 24 February 2016 12: 35
    -1
    What is there to argue about if China has military aircraft on the island? It remains either to recognize the status quo or to fight. And the war is not known how it will end for Japan and its US patron ...
    1. Kibalchish
      Kibalchish 24 February 2016 12: 45
      +3
      What does Japan have to do with it, if specifically Vietnam claims to this island?
  8. armageddon
    armageddon 24 February 2016 12: 42
    0
    Quote: Michael67
    Well done, our partners from the Middle Kingdom. All nerves to pinch nerves. How much foam will flow out of the State Department? ... it's scary to imagine. The Chinese were offended that they were not the first in the list of dangers among the openers.

    Hmm ... I would like to remind the words of Alexander 3 "Russia has two allies, the Army and the Navy !!!
  9. chikenous59
    chikenous59 24 February 2016 12: 44
    +4
    Gentlemen, is it worth praising China? The islands are really controversial. You now praise China, which by force has appropriated the islands to itself. But at the same time, you always criticize in a fierce manner when the United States or NATO forcefully achieve their goals. How do you understand? You are against double standards. Or not already?
    1. chunga-changa
      chunga-changa 24 February 2016 12: 56
      -1
      On these islands, all the "applicants" have already built their bases a long time ago, China, in general, has become the last.
      1. Nosgoth
        Nosgoth 24 February 2016 15: 18
        0
        Can I have a list of bases and a map in the studio ?!
        1. chunga-changa
          chunga-changa 24 February 2016 15: 53
          +1
          Have you been banned in Google?
    2. Talgat
      Talgat 24 February 2016 18: 15
      +1
      Quote: chikenous59
      How do you understand? You are against double standards. Or not already?


      Comrades! don't get fooled - the primitive trap of liberals

      Yes, NATO and the USA really had double standards - and it was necessary to point this out in order to destroy their propaganda - they supposedly kill and bomb for the sake of "democracy"

      Secondly, there are no moral standards in geopolitics.
      All countries do that. what is profitable for them
      You, the citizens of Russia, must support what is beneficial to Russia
      If China opposes world aggressors and their mongrels, then this is beneficial to all of us
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. RomanS
    RomanS 24 February 2016 14: 26
    +1
    Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan. And in the very center is now China. A pair of rural islands in the South China Sea, like the Crimea in Black. Interestingly, will there be screams about annexation in the world media?
  12. Ros 56
    Ros 56 24 February 2016 16: 47
    +1
    Whoever got up, that and slippers. It always has been. who do not like complain to the beholder. But he can grab from the Chinese, if he climbs.
  13. Don36
    Don36 24 February 2016 17: 38
    0
    The islands were controversial until there was a Chinese army. Today, the Chinese islands and they can be taken away only by force, attacking the Chinese soldiers. And this is a war with China, I don’t think there will be anyone ...