Military Review

Media: Russia this year will reduce military spending on 5%

72
The expenses of the RF Ministry of Defense in connection with the economic situation will be reduced in 2016 by 5%, the blog reports bmpd With reference to the newspaper "Vedomosti".


Media: Russia this year will reduce military spending on 5%


In its article, the publication refers to a source close to the leadership of the military department, as well as to the interlocutor in the lower house of the Russian parliament. Official proposals to reduce military spending in the State Duma has not yet been reported.

“This is not the first reduction of the military budget since the crisis began. In 2015, military spending was reduced by 3,8%. The costs of the section "National Defense" in the budget-2016 are planned in the amount of 3,14 trillion. rub. (or 4% of GDP), and, on the basis of this amount, the reduction will be almost 160 billion rubles, ”the article says.

"The main part of the costs of the" National Defense "section in 2016 was the cost of the state defense order, i.e., the purchase of mass-produced new weapons, research and development work on the development of new weapons, the repair and modernization of existing power systems weapons. These costs constitute 68% of all expenses for the section, or, according to the assessment of the military economy laboratory of the Economic Policy Institute, 2,142 trillion. rubles, ”explains the publication.

According to a source in the Ministry of Defense, "it is on the costs of state defense orders and will have the main volume of reductions." At the same time, “the cost of maintaining the personnel in any case is planned to remain unchanged in any case,” he noted.

“It will be possible to save the necessary funds in the field of procurement and development of armaments primarily by transferring to the future the development costs of a number of programs, the priority of which is not so high. Similar methods have been used in the past, ”said the source.

In his opinion, "this should be the least affected by nuclear deterrence forces - the cost of developing and purchasing weapons for the Strategic Missile Forces, nuclear-powered submarines with ballistic missiles and strategic bombers, although there are reserves here."

“For example, the need for accelerated development of a mobile railroad missile complex or new strategic bombers (both of the new generation and restoring the production of the Tu-160 bomber) is not obvious, and the pace of re-equipment with new nuclear submarines can be stretched,” the source said.

But most of all, in his opinion, “the cost of a number of expensive conventional weapons systems for general forces, including for fleet и aviationto a lesser extent - into the armament of the Ground Forces. ”

“But the costs of deploying new connections due to the changed strategic situation will not be significantly reduced, this reduction will not affect the operation in Syria. The annual cost of this operation is significantly lower than the planned reduction and is funded mainly from current expenses, ”said the source.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 24 February 2016 10: 22
    26
    "Best Finance Minister" Mr. Kudrin applauds! I remember that it was precisely because of the conflict over defense funding that he was kicked out of the government. And now Alexei Leonidovich's Wishlist come true. The freed up money should be invested in American debt obligations. Right?
    PS BZHRK "Barguzin" sorry. Apparently, we will not see it soon .. As well as the new Tu-160. I’d better not say anything about PAK YES ...
    1. Pravdarm
      Pravdarm 24 February 2016 10: 25
      12
      Well it starts! It's morning on the farm! That's all - LADIES and his "team"!
      then DAM, then not DAM!
      then "TAKE"!
      Freed money
      1. cniza
        cniza 24 February 2016 10: 34
        +9
        “The bulk of expenditures under the National Defense section in 2016 are expenditures on the state defense order, that is, on the purchase of serially produced new weapons, research and development work on the development of new weapons, repair and modernization of existing forces of weapon systems. These expenses account for 68% of all expenses for the section, or, according to the laboratory of military economics of the Institute for Economic Policy, 2,142 trillion. rubles ", - explains the publication.


        Very great hope is precisely on Shoigu S.K., which is reasonable to do.
      2. karpah
        karpah 24 February 2016 20: 02
        +1
        I consider the reduction of the military budget a betrayal. It’s better to transfer people to cards, but increase the military budget. After all, the enemy is at the gate.
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN 24 February 2016 21: 33
          +1
          Quote: karpah
          I consider the reduction of the military budget a betrayal. It’s better to transfer people to cards, but increase the military budget. After all, the enemy is at the gate.

          It is better to "persuade" the oligarchs to dump 5% of their income and increase the WB by 10% ... yes
    2. SS68SS
      SS68SS 24 February 2016 10: 26
      +5
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      "Best Finance Minister" Kudrin applauds! I remember that it was precisely because of the conflict over defense spending that the government was flooded. And now Alexei Leonidovich's Wishlist come true. The freed up money can be invested in American debt obligations. Right?


      Bombs and missiles have probably done enough. But saving on promising developments is a betrayal.
      1. 4ekist
        4ekist 24 February 2016 12: 53
        0
        As for bombs, missiles and even shells, I deeply doubt it. But not disposed of ammunition since the Second World War, probably still abound.
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain 24 February 2016 10: 26
      21
      Quote: Ami du peuple
      Kudrin applauds

      Not only Kudrin, but the entire liberal riffraff, led by Siluanov and Dvorkovich, all the more so now that it smells of war. That's ...... (untranslatable Russian folklore).
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 24 February 2016 10: 35
        12
        Quote: vovanpain
        (untranslated Russian folklore).

        folklore, this is "a birch stood in the field", and here, "an untranslatable pun, using local idiomatic expressions" (C)
      2. brisk
        brisk 24 February 2016 11: 45
        -5
        Quote: vovanpain
        vovanpain (7) Today, 10:26 ↑ New
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Kudrin applauds
        Not only Kudrin, but the entire liberal riffraff, led by Siluanov and Dvorkovich, all the more so now that it smells of war. That's ...... (untranslatable Russian folklore).


        What war? But what do you already have, as if everyone had bumped their heads ... Russia, if anyone should beware, then only Japan with a landing on the Kuril Islands, but in the direction of neighboring China to glance, do not forget that it has 8 times more people, and the sun is strong and therefore not sickly. From there should be covered. All! No more fraternal Arab Syria and other Kurdistan of the Russian Federation and at HEX are not needed !!! Sober up in the end !!!
        1. brisk
          brisk 24 February 2016 12: 08
          -2
          That minus, minus ... A hamster conscious ... A hundred times I will repeat the same. The more you minus, the more my truth will be visible.
        2. your1970
          your1970 24 February 2016 12: 21
          +1
          "If Russia should be afraid of anyone, then only Japan with a landing on the Kuriles," - Japan being in a state of war with the Russian Federation (there is still no peace treaty !!), the landing on the Kuriles will not be able to land, the Russian Federation will strike reciprocal.Taking into account the population density: shoot at any place on the map - there will be a sea of ​​victims. America is not a fact that it wants to fight, there are no fools among the bourgeoisie just to lay their heads without dough, and there will be no quick profits there ......
        3. 4ekist
          4ekist 24 February 2016 12: 57
          +2
          History says the opposite. Gunpowder must be dry and tanks fast.
    4. Corporal Valera
      Corporal Valera 24 February 2016 10: 29
      +5
      Ministry of Economic Development in action! Sequestration is our everything! We’ll cut it off, we’ll stick it there. Trishkin caftan, skm.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 24 February 2016 10: 37
        +1
        Quote: Corporal Valera
        Trishkin caftan.

        and the liberals believe that these are "Pythagorean pants" ...
    5. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 24 February 2016 10: 32
      +4
      Media: Russia this year will reduce military spending on 5%
      5%, this is nothing, but in billions it is minus ships and "armats" ... (by the way, UVZ has very, very bad "health")
      1. mixei
        mixei 24 February 2016 12: 00
        +4
        Well .... by what banquets the head of the UVZ rolls up, you can’t say that the plant is all in debt, that the plant’s employees expect reduction, that customers are breaking contracts because of a delay in product delivery ... well, you’ll think of just ten lemits for evening...
    6. vlad66
      vlad66 24 February 2016 10: 33
      22
      If we cut the salary by 5% for our government and deputies, there will be enough money for the TU-160 and PAK DA and for the Borei.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 24 February 2016 11: 07
        18
        Quote: vlad66
        If we cut the salary by 5% for our government and deputies, there will be enough money for the TU-160 and PAK DA and for the Borei.
      2. weksha50
        weksha50 24 February 2016 11: 17
        +6
        Quote: vlad66
        If we cut the salary by 5% for our government and deputies, there will be enough money for the TU-160 and PAK DA and for the Borei.



        And if you also introduce a luxury tax, which the Duma has not missed for a year ??? Yes, charge it as it should ???
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 24 February 2016 18: 51
          +1
          In this law it is not clear what is a luxury, and if it were adopted in this form, they would already have taxed everyone.
      3. Vadim237
        Vadim237 24 February 2016 18: 49
        0
        That would be enough for the production of 50 Tu 160s - it needs at least a trillion rubles.
    7. Finches
      Finches 24 February 2016 10: 50
      11
      I'd rather cut someone from the Ministry of Finance ... or maybe from the government! I think so, if you reduce the staff of officials, and for the rest, and add deputies of all stripes to them, cut salaries, ., then you can build not one, but five "Barguzins"! After all, the fact that they have been eating for two decades is the main merit of the Armed Forces! Their warm places were paid for with the blood of thousands of soldiers and officers in Transnistria, Chechnya, Georgia ...

      But all this is lyrics - for the current government, if they want to continue to warm assholes at the expense of taxpayers, in no case should one touch social programs - increasing pensions, providing housing for the military, etc.!
      1. 4ekist
        4ekist 24 February 2016 13: 04
        +1
        How do they spend money in the Ministry of Finance in part, I have an idea. Well-worn states, non-sense purchases and inefficient spending of state money ...
    8. Drmadfisher
      Drmadfisher 24 February 2016 10: 58
      +1
      but I don’t think it’s bad (maybe they figured it out with a cut?)
      1. weksha50
        weksha50 24 February 2016 11: 19
        +5
        Quote: DrMadfisher
        but I don’t think it’s bad (maybe figured out the cut?)



        Hmm ... Dreams, dreams ... As the saying goes: "Don't wait!" ...
    9. Vadim237
      Vadim237 24 February 2016 18: 45
      0
      Mostly they will save on the fleet - the construction there is long-playing.
  2. Coconut Tima
    Coconut Tima 24 February 2016 10: 23
    +6
    A source close to the interlocutor, citing a blogger to a newspaper ....
  3. tomket
    tomket 24 February 2016 10: 25
    +6
    So much for you. From Siluanov with Ulyukaev. Do you want new Tu-160 and nuclear missile carriers? Ha-ha. To want, as they say, is not harmful to Comrade Shoigu. As I understand it, the MiG-35 was not put into service precisely because of these two "outstanding economic geniuses."
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 24 February 2016 18: 54
      0
      Weapons are ordered and accepted neither by the Ministry of Economic Development.
  4. Primus pilus
    Primus pilus 24 February 2016 10: 26
    +8
    5% is not critical, if everything is done correctly, the country's defense capability does not decrease.
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 24 February 2016 10: 39
      11
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      5% is not critical, if everything is done correctly, the country's defense capability does not decrease.


      Now you are stuck on the minuses .... laughing Here they do not admit the thought that one must live within one's means. now they will stick on me too. By my own example, I will say that I refused to replace the car this year (the "old" one is already three years old, I will suffer a little - another year), and then I will change .. And what would you do on a national scale?
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 24 February 2016 10: 57
        15
        Quote: gray smeet
        Now you are stuck on the minuses

        For what though, keep the other way around +,
        Quote: gray smeet
        that you need to live within your means.

        If only drivers could understand it with their hands.
        Quote: Ivan Ivanovich
        so on the contrary, they want to sell state. own

        Well, they will not cut their salaries, for this there are working people. hi
        1. VALERIK_097
          VALERIK_097 24 February 2016 12: 00
          0
          I agree, I will carry out the same amount of work, but I will receive 5% less. Somehow I’m not a camouflage. Well, maybe I can switch to salaries from the transaction — what will be the immediate savings, the plan-law does not work in this case.
    2. amirbek
      amirbek 24 February 2016 10: 43
      +3
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      if everything is done correctly

      if you dispossess someone and nationalize something, it will be several times more
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 24 February 2016 10: 50
        +3
        Quote: Amirbek
        Quote: Primus Pilus
        if everything is done correctly

        if to dispossess someone and something nationalize - it will come out many times more


        Already dispossessed in due time, Amirbek. In Uzbekistan, this is not very well (to put it mildly) good. Where is the criterion for whom it is possible to take property and who does not? After all, all millions are earned not in an honest way - a priori!

        And about nationalizing - on the contrary, they want to sell the state. property (example - Rossneft)! laughing
    3. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 24 February 2016 10: 58
      +2
      Yeah, in 2015 by 3.8, in 2016 by another 5, do you think they will not reduce further? If we delay the commissioning of new nuclear submarines, taking into account the 20-year downtime, soon the number of these boats will be piece by piece.
    4. Mera joota
      Mera joota 24 February 2016 11: 17
      0
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      5% is not critical, if everything is done correctly, the country's defense capability does not decrease.

      Do not forget such an important fact as the depreciation of the ruble (import substitution only on paper) and the growth of housing and communal services tariffs, all this leads to an increase in the cost of production and OCD, many projects will have to be cut.
      1. Primus pilus
        Primus pilus 24 February 2016 11: 27
        +3
        You just need to steal less and then you won’t have to reduce it.
    5. weksha50
      weksha50 24 February 2016 11: 21
      0
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      5% is not critical, if everything is done correctly, the country's defense capability does not decrease.



      We, Russia, are on the eve of the war ... We are already overlaid so that there is nowhere to go ... So we need to talk not about "uncriticality", but about the direct betrayal of the country and the people inhabiting it ...
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 24 February 2016 11: 30
        +5
        Quote: weksha50


        We, Russia, are on the eve of the war ... We are already overlaid so that there is nowhere to go ... So we need to talk not about "uncriticality", but about the direct betrayal of the country and the people inhabiting it ...


        Treason of the country and people ...; enemies of the people, say ...
        All (workable) need to work a lot, as our predecessors did during the years of the first five-year plans, and then they did not work - they slaughtered(sorry, but you will not say otherwise)! Is the current generation ready to work this way? I’m not sure ... because I myself occasionally collect people at my enterprise ... If only knocking on the keyboard - then yes, there will be a lot of people there ...
        There is one more point:
        Catch Julio from the state. bodies and to the wall, their property is subject to confiscation.
        1. gray smeet
          gray smeet 24 February 2016 11: 52
          +1
          If anyone is interested, I’ll give you the figures of the first five-year periods (since the first five-year periods have already been affected):

          FIRST FIVE-YEAR PLAN (1929-1932). The gross industrial output over 4 years has doubled. Including: electricity, sulfuric acid - 2,7 times, coal and oil - 1,8 times, steel - 1,4 times, cement - 2, metal-cutting machines - 10, tractors, cars - 30 time. From the speech of I.V. Stalin: “... we have done more than we expected ... the tractor, automobile, aviation industry, machine-tool industry, agricultural machine-building were re-created, the new coal and metallurgical base in the East was re-created ...” In Ivanovo they were built, equipped and equipped The largest melange plant in Europe, the spinning mills Krasnaya Talka and Dzerzhinsky, a peat machine factory, automobile plants in Nizhny Novgorod, tractor plants, and Uralmash were launched ... Trains went along Turksib to Central Asia. By the end of 1930, the country did not experience unemployment. With the beginning of collectivization, equipment came to the village. The country has almost no illiteracy. From the speech of IV Stalin on February 4, 1931: “We are 50-100 years behind the advanced countries. We have to run this distance in 10 years. Either we do it, or they crush us. ”

          SECOND FIVE YEARS (1933-1937). Over the five-year period, the national income has grown 2,1 times, industrial production - 2,1 times, agriculture - 1,3 times. The Ural-Kuzbass, the country's second coal and metallurgical base, was built. In 1935, metro lines were put into operation in Moscow. The Stakhanov movement "For shock labor" was widely developed in the country. In 1937, the Dnieper Hydroelectric Power Station gave the first current, the construction of the Moscow-Volga navigable canal was completed, Papanin's expedition landed at the North Pole and deployed the first polar station SP-1, the crew of the ANT-25 aircraft V. Chkalov, G. Baidukov, A. Belyakov made a non-stop flight from the USSR to the USA through the North Pole. By the end of the five-year plan, 97 out of every hundred peasant households belonged to collective farms. On December 12, 1937, direct and secret elections to the Union Parliament - the Supreme Soviet of the USSR were held for the first time in the country.

          Are we ready to work like that?
          1. weksha50
            weksha50 24 February 2016 18: 52
            0
            Quote: gray smeet
            Are we ready to work like that?



            Unfortunately - no ... And they have forgotten how, and the desire of today's youth ... Only the words remained: "These days will not cease glory" ...
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 24 February 2016 18: 56
        0
        And whoever overtook us in the Baltic states, maybe Ukraine is a really terrible force.
    6. kapitan92
      kapitan92 24 February 2016 11: 23
      +6
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      5% is not critical, if everything is done correctly, the country's defense capability does not decrease.

      I think that 5% is the "first sign" of sequestering the defense budget. Even with this reduction, budget execution looks problematic. The budget includes a price of $ 50 per barrel of oil, and now it is at the level of $ 33-34. It's funny that the initiator of the idea, the Ministry of Finance, refuses to use the word “sequestration”, which is usually used in such cases, and speaks of “budget maneuver”. The cuts in funding are likely to affect expensive projects in the field of shipbuilding, costs will be reduced on a number of expensive systems in the field of conventional weapons for general-purpose forces, including aviation, and to a lesser extent for arming the Ground Forces.
      There is a failure of the liberal economic policy of the government.
    7. midashko
      midashko 24 February 2016 11: 36
      +2
      Now, if the oligarchs reduce their income by 5%, then I agree, they are not critical. But the budget can be increased by 20 percent.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 24 February 2016 19: 01
        0
        What does it mean to reduce the income of the oligarchs - cut their business or something.
    8. aleks 62 next
      aleks 62 next 24 February 2016 12: 16
      0
      .... 5% is not critical, if everything is done correctly, the country's defense will not decline ....

      ... I think if you look well, then these 5% could be found without difficulty in other expenditure parts of the budget .... I will not give examples .... But you can’t save on your army (especially on new equipment) .. ... hi
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 24 February 2016 14: 23
        +1
        Quote: aleks 62 next
        especially on new technology

        The conversation seems to be about freezing some R&D and modernizing some old types of equipment. request
    9. samoletil18
      samoletil18 24 February 2016 13: 15
      +1
      Quote: Primus Pilus
      5% is not critical, if everything is done correctly, the country's defense capability does not decrease.

      on behalf of people close to the feeding trough, I’ll note: it’s very critical, how much will the rollback size decrease (!), now, what (?), will it become less by two mistresses, and instead of a Bentley, my wife will have a smelly behu 740th? And how to live? crying
  5. Ivan Ivanovich
    Ivan Ivanovich 24 February 2016 10: 27
    +1
    We hope that they will not cut it "live" ...
  6. AlexTires
    AlexTires 24 February 2016 10: 27
    +2
    So, Medvedev agreed with Kudrin, what is more profitable to feed someone else’s army ???
    1. castle
      castle 24 February 2016 12: 38
      +1
      Here you are attached to Medvedev. But he, Mr. Medvedev, alone and without gracious permission from the guarantor, he does not dare to fart.
      1. AlexTires
        AlexTires 24 February 2016 13: 59
        0
        Do you sincerely think that each of his own bunch of Medvedev and Co., agree with Putin? Why then is this company needed?
        When many of the most pressing issues are resolved by Putin in a "manual" mode, one should not be surprised if the decision was actually made by the Government's economic bloc without approval.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 24 February 2016 19: 07
      0
      We have already fed foreign armies for a long time with equipment, equipment, and everything else - the truth is at their expense. A 5 percent reduction in military spending will not affect the rearmament of the army as a whole.
  7. Velek
    Velek 24 February 2016 10: 32
    +3
    The defense industry is now fully operational, enterprises are busy for years to come. No need to worry, comrades, that such a move, connected with cutting spending on state defense orders, helps to build and equip new production facilities. We need new shipyards and workshops, we really need them, there are not enough critical ones !!! And these expenses are called differently.
  8. Achilles
    Achilles 24 February 2016 10: 45
    +3
    All our oppositionists only write that all the money goes to the Army, but not enough to the economy. But without a strong Army, they will simply crush us over time, especially since the Army was in such a great decline that if it went further, it would be it’s already difficult to restore, at the moment the Army has begun to get out of this darkness and that’s good, I think from the beginning it’s necessary to create a strong Army then to think about the economy, the West will not allow us to develop the economy anyway, they’re talking to us on an equal footing, but this a fair trend can only be corrected with a strong Army
    1. Mera joota
      Mera joota 24 February 2016 11: 19
      -5
      Quote: Achilles
      But without a strong Army, they’ll just trample us over time

      Hungry Russians?
    2. brisk
      brisk 24 February 2016 11: 55
      -1
      Quote: Achilles
      All our oppositionists only write that all the money goes to the Army, but not enough to the economy. But without a strong Army, they’ll just crush us over time


      For the Russian Federation, 6% of the budget is now quite enough for defense. Because 8% in the present difficult time will already be worse for her people. And in the most prosperous times it is not advisable to raise above 10%. History has confirmed this.
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 24 February 2016 19: 08
      +1
      Only China can trample us and no one else.
  9. pts-m
    pts-m 24 February 2016 10: 47
    +1
    something is vague. Is it an open secret used, or are they simply rubbing people in their ears so that they live more modestly? Who are we fooling around with? themselves? or on foreign islands in banks there is no place for investments?
  10. minus
    minus 24 February 2016 10: 47
    +6
    It is possible to reduce by 30 percent without any damage. BUT!!! If the sawflies and thieves of the defense budget to the highest degree ....
    1. Mera joota
      Mera joota 24 February 2016 11: 20
      +1
      Quote: Minus
      It is possible to reduce by 30 percent without any damage. BUT!!! If the sawflies and thieves of the defense budget to the highest degree ....

      they will not raise to the holy hand ...
  11. vglazunov
    vglazunov 24 February 2016 10: 47
    0
    I do not understand these liberalists how to save on the defense potential of Russia and invest in treasury, i.e. to the US defense industry. Who is in power, patriots or traitors?
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 24 February 2016 11: 22
      +1
      In these conditions, when we are under sanctions and various terrorists and aggressive regimes such as the US, the EU, Israel, Turkey, and so on "frolic" around our country, it is impossible to reduce defense spending.
      And if there is not enough money to increase the tax on the rich, let all these Friedman Khans and the like Rotenbergs and Vekselbergs shell out.
      1. Chisayna
        Chisayna 24 February 2016 12: 09
        +1
        To "shell out" them, a revolution is needed. And if there is a revolution, then "these" will again be in the forefront. A vicious circle. The best remedy for "them" is 37 years. But, as the guarantor said, we will not have 37 years. "these" hang on the neck of the working people. How, the guarantor himself, guaranteed their safety.
        1. weksha50
          weksha50 24 February 2016 18: 53
          0
          Quote: Chisain
          The best remedy for "them", 37 years old.


          But then the people's commissars, prime ministers, ministers are needed not like Medvedev-Siluanov and the like ...
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 24 February 2016 19: 12
          +1
          Nor will there be any revolutions - they have already passed all this, people are busy with their own affairs - they are working, and coups and idiots are only needed for idiots.
    2. Wheel
      Wheel 24 February 2016 12: 10
      +1
      Quote: vglazunov
      I do not understand these liberalists how to save on the defense potential of Russia and invest in treasury, i.e. to the US defense industry. Who is in power, patriots or traitors?

      Take a look who is in the consultant auditors of our ministries so as not to ask stupid questions ...

      Central Bank: PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit (PwC) auditor. The developer of the risk management system is Oliver Wyman.
      Ministry of Finance: KPMG, Deloitte.
      Ministry of Economic Development: KPMG, Deloitte.
      Russian Ministry of Industry: PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte.
      The Federal Property Management Agency, the Ministry of Education and Science: PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
      Department of Education: PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
  12. weksha50
    weksha50 24 February 2016 11: 06
    +3
    "" It will be possible to save the necessary funds in the field of procurement and development of weapons, first of all, by transferring the costs of developing a number of programs to the future, whose priority is not so high"...

    Unfortunately, we do not have NON-priority programs for the rearmament and equipping of the army and navy ...

    And the reduction of these costs is again a blow to industry in the person of the military-industrial complex, to science ... Everything is interconnected ... And, in fact, the USA and NATO are achieving such a result - reducing our spending on weapons ...

    Hell, after all, there is an opportunity to get money, but only some people don’t have a desire ... And Siluanov again whines about a lack of money for anti-crisis measures ... All this is babble ...
  13. Ilya77
    Ilya77 24 February 2016 11: 17
    +3
    Yeah, but we have $ 90 billion in US debt, and in November we invested $ 6 billion (that's almost 500 billion rubles) whose economy are we feeding? Do you see any money from them, if they are already cutting the defense industry, what will happen to medicine and education? Completely translate into self-sufficiency?
  14. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 24 February 2016 11: 30
    0
    It's a shame. We are just starting to get on our feet, and here again crutches are slipping. To not run fast. The mind cannot understand Russia ...
  15. SG11
    SG11 24 February 2016 11: 55
    +2
    eh, the State Duma would reduce. percent so 100. and the building (s) to the centers of children's creativity to transfer
  16. Dimontius
    Dimontius 24 February 2016 12: 27
    +3
    revenues fell $ 100 billion from one oil industry. Is Medvedev to blame? Sheikh in Arabia or the Emir in Qatar, everyone is sitting together and cursing Medvedev and Siluanov? And nothing that we also decided to play the leading roles in the game "throw out the slate for the common good"? Given such realities, only 5% of the sequestration of the defense industry, this is fucking patriotic. Here I even read about PAK YES that people are not happy with its non-financing. SERIOUSLY?? Do you even understand that people just started to live normally (not all, but for the most part) in the last 10 years? We sighed a little, bought some clothes, felt like a strong nation again. I understand that it's always cool to fly uphill, only when they don't try to cut the cable car to hell with you.
  17. Chisayna
    Chisayna 24 February 2016 12: 48
    0
    Who started living normally? Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, of course they have oil and gas. And other regions? Local in Surgut, their hari will be turned off by visitors from other regions. They are fried for oil and gas.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 24 February 2016 19: 14
      0
      Who started living normally? - Almost everyone who does their job.
  18. Mercenary
    Mercenary 24 February 2016 12: 58
    0
    It’s better to withdraw money from Rusnano, which has not been doing anything for 7 (seven) years, as grandmas invest in foreign banks, washing them for wages (no wages are paid at the factory) for remuneration (which award is also not good?), Chubais, Serdyukov and other thieves and their families!
  19. Shm
    Shm 24 February 2016 14: 28
    0
    And Chubais and all kinds of Abramovich’s funds there, as long as you want, then the country needs more than a hundred dollar billionaires. 99% Jews who took control of everything in the 90s, so return everything to the state, nationalize and then there’s enough money for everything, 160 billion rubles are hundreds of tanks and dozens of aircraft that we now need so much. This is a betrayal in this situation to cut the defense budget.
  20. regdan
    regdan 24 February 2016 14: 45
    +2
    Some blog (which by the way I found out only after reading this article) reported referring to "Vedomosti" which some source reported to the MO. Damn dear edition of Military Review, explain why there is such a FUFLO print?
    ps Citizens commentators, do you know this blog? Answers can be written simply Yes or No ...
    1. MASK
      MASK 24 February 2016 20: 22
      0
      Quote: regdan
      Some blog (which by the way I found out only after reading this article) reported referring to "Vedomosti" which some source reported to the MO. Damn dear edition of Military Review, explain why there is such a FUFLO print?
      ps Citizens commentators, do you know this blog? Answers can be written simply Yes or No ...

      Yes, we know ... So what?
      1. regdan
        regdan 25 February 2016 07: 44
        0
        only one ... hmm well that's all ...
  21. Old26
    Old26 24 February 2016 20: 46
    0
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    PS BZHRK "Barguzin" sorry. Apparently, we will not see it soon .. As well as the new Tu-160. I’d better not say anything about PAK YES ...

    Well, now "Yaroslavna's crying" has begun. Guys. Nobody cancels primary programs. BZHRK is still at an early stage. There was no BI yet. And if it enters the database not in 2020, but in 2022, nothing terrible will happen. Moreover, there is immeasurable work and not only on the rocket. The new version of the TU-160 and PAK DA are also not priority products. Now let them at least modernize the TU-160.

    Quote: karpah
    I consider the reduction of the military budget a betrayal. It’s better to transfer people to cards, but increase the military budget. After all, the enemy is at the gate.

    If you translate it into cards, then you can really get a lot inside. Incl. and "riot". Moreover, the enemy at the gates is mostly seen exclusively by jingoistic patriots. Those who are adequate understand that there is nothing super scary in the situation and, most importantly, to maintain stability, and not to enter cards

    Quote: 4ekist
    History says the opposite. Gunpowder must be dry and tanks fast.

    Is he soaked now? And the tanks are rusty and slow-moving? Do not blame history in this case. What good mind would go to war on a nuclear power with such potential ??
    1. 4ekist
      4ekist 24 February 2016 22: 17
      0
      If you take a closer look at some of the "gentlemen", then there are not so few of them, invalids on the head.
  22. Old26
    Old26 25 February 2016 19: 17
    0
    Quote: weksha50

    Unfortunately, we do not have NON-priority programs for the rearmament and equipping of the army and navy ...

    There is. And a sufficient number. For example, such a missile system as the Barguzin. If it goes into service 2-3 years later, nothing will change at all.
    Or the same TU-160M2. EMNIP production is planned from 2020. what will change if it goes into service in 2022 or 2024. Or PAK YES. It’s not at all clear what it will be.
    But to upgrade the old TU-101 under X-102/95 is necessary. As well as upgrade, for example, TU-160 to version 160M.
    And so you can go about many programs. Let better-developed plans for construction and modernization be implemented. And long-term plans - they can wait a bit.

    Quote: weksha50
    And the reduction of these costs is again a blow to industry in the person of the military-industrial complex, to science ... Everything is interconnected ... And, in fact, the USA and NATO are achieving such a result - reducing our spending on weapons ...

    Hit? in principle, there is no blow. Several terms are shifted to the right, but not completely canceled