Military Review

Media: the Obama administration rejected a plan to provide regular bombardment of IG facilities in Libya

31
The White House rejected the plan of the military department, providing for regular air strikes on the IG in Libya, and the deployment of American special forces there, reports RIA News Post publication Daily Beast.


Security forces in Libya

The main goal for the air strikes was to become the Libyan Sirte - the birthplace of the former leader of the country, Muammar Gaddafi. Currently, the city is hosted by bandits.

“The administration showed little enthusiasm,” an unnamed Pentagon official admitted to the publication.

Earlier, French and Italian leaders made belligerent statements about readiness for intervention in Libya. In this regard, "some representatives of the Pentagon believe that President Barack Obama would like to see these countries at the head of this military campaign," the newspaper notes.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pravdarm
    Pravdarm 19 February 2016 10: 05
    19
    rejected the plan of the military department, providing for regular airstrikes on IS in Libya
    Sure. Why bomb your own.
    Libya, in short, now make the capital of the IG!
    Ah, Muammar, your country was torn to pieces after you! The jackal is diabolical!
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 19 February 2016 10: 07
      +6
      Media: the Obama administration rejected a plan to provide regular bombardment of IG facilities in Libya

      Ash stump: IG has not yet spread throughout Libya! smile
      1. Michael67
        Michael67 19 February 2016 10: 07
        +3
        Well, yes, they will bomb the city again. Together with him they hope to bomb terrorists. This was announced in advance. The bloody show continues.
        1. cniza
          cniza 19 February 2016 10: 11
          +7
          They just don’t know what to do and this is not banter, but they really don’t know what to do - the computer does not give out a solution.
          1. Pereira
            Pereira 19 February 2016 10: 32
            +3
            I know what to do.
            A nontrivial solution is needed.
            It is necessary to lure Russia there. Thereby, 2 results can be achieved:
            - ISIS will be destroyed,
            - Russia can be blamed for the destruction of Libya, having removed all responsibility from the West.
            True, a lot of organizational, political, military, financial problems arise here. But all this is solvable.
            There is only one unsolvable problem - the trouble with fools is not so great in Russia that you put your head in a noose for money.
            However, when we finish with Syria it will be possible to pay attention to the neighbors. But only when the situation is ripe, on our terms, and only when the general people are completely screwed up.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. vovanpain
          vovanpain 19 February 2016 10: 22
          10
          Quote: Michael67
          Well, yes, they will bomb the city again. Together with him they hope to bomb terrorists. This was announced in advance. The bloody show continues.

          It’s just that Libya is not being bombed by the Russian air forces and there’s nothing to blame. One word is jackals.
      2. andre
        andre 19 February 2016 10: 10
        +5
        Yes, obamka is already "demobilized", I remember this state, when no one cares, that's home! The main thing is not to think of some kind of "demobilization chord" soldier
      3. Now we are free
        Now we are free 19 February 2016 10: 29
        +7
        In fact, the question is much deeper than simply unwillingness to give the US Air Force the go-ahead for another "Carpet Democracy" ...
        The cream of ISIS and other Nusr is brought to Libya from Iraq, Syria, Egypt, etc. they are brought by ships of Turkey and other countries accountable for the operation to "Rescue the terrorist gene pool" as you understand the United States. Why Libya?
        1. Direct proximity to an old European who is still showing signs of life.
        2. Oil-rich areas of Libya
        3. The ability to spin another Arab storm is good, there are states nearby where you can recruit ordinary consumable units in addition to those who have already become elite and have gained rich experience not only in waging war BUT! institutions, etc. that we can observe now in Syria on the territory of ISIS controlled.
        4. The ability to blackmail (threatening ISIS locusts) against such countries as Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia and generally deepen ISIS further to Africa in the direction of Niger, Chad, Sudan (and not far from Somalia laughing ). By the way, Egypt and Algeria have rather large and technically well-equipped armies, so if the Libyan porridge brews and the civil war in Algeria and Egypt begins to smolder, the United States will make another gesheft by bombing its own breeding ISIS locusts and pretending to be rescuers coming to the rescue ... living standards of the population in countries such as Chad, Niger, etc. will allow ISIS to recruit so many "Cannon Infantry" (ready to fight for a bowl of soup) that the ISIS numbers and internationalization that we have seen in Syria and Iraq will seem childish ...
        In general, the United States will not bomb Libya, as it is currently their incubator reserve. Not only that, they think they will not allow other countries to cauterize the next head of the hydra of world terrorism. (Well, perhaps the bombing of the desert as the United States and its satellites did) in Syria and Iraq.
        The positive thing is that the Syrian and Iraqi "Elite terrorists" of the United States will move from Syria and Iraq to Libya, away from us and from our friendly Syria / Iraq, allowing the Russian savior bear to put its paw (in the form of naval / air force bases) in the Middle East and as I said earlier, reduce terrorist traffic in the CSTO across the near borders.
        The negative point is that another bomb is being placed under Europe (and given the number of poor Africans who, by and large, need an idea and food), and this bomb will be more terrible than the notorious "Arab Spring" ...
    2. VNP1958PVN
      VNP1958PVN 19 February 2016 10: 08
      +4
      Yes, let them get divorced there, then Libya will ask the VKS ...
      1. Nord2015
        Nord2015 19 February 2016 10: 25
        +1
        Quote: VNP1958PVN
        Yes, let them get divorced there, then Libya will ask the VKS ...

        That's when the Western "peacekeepers" will appear there, you have to save the bearded from evil Russia.
      2. Pereira
        Pereira 19 February 2016 10: 34
        +5
        There is no one in Libya to ask for the videoconferencing.
        Only one person can do this - the son of Gaddafi. But he is in prison and he faces the death penalty. So Libya is now an ownerless territory.
    3. DMB_95
      DMB_95 19 February 2016 10: 14
      +1
      Unfinished igilovites will need to be dumped somewhere from Syria. Barak Husseinich carefully prepares them for security Libya.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    4. vkl-47
      vkl-47 19 February 2016 10: 14
      0
      from Syria he will move to Libya. Now it’s not Racca their capital will be Benghagi
  2. The black
    The black 19 February 2016 10: 05
    +5
    Yes, you write this! How can a mother kill her child! What is the bombing of igles? laughing... Obama is absolutely a beast or something to raise a hand on a bloodstream?
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 19 February 2016 10: 07
    0
    According to Turkish media, there are 17 Turkish Air Force pilots among those killed in the February 22 terrorist attack in Ankara. most of those killed in the explosion of a military bus are Turkish Air Force pilots.
    Not in the subject can, but God is
  5. RUSS
    RUSS 19 February 2016 10: 07
    0
    "Obama is a sucker, but he has a hint, a lesson for good fellows"
    I hope that subsequent US presidents will not repeat the mistakes of this lop-eared president.
    1. The black
      The black 19 February 2016 10: 14
      +2
      I hope that subsequent US presidents will not repeat the mistakes of this lop-eared president.
      You are an optimist smile ... He will not repeat his mistakes. He (and most likely SHE) - will make new ones. smile .... Something I do not see among real candidates to take the post of president of the United States of people who are capable of constructive, equal dialogue with Russia.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. RUSS
        RUSS 19 February 2016 11: 13
        0
        Quote: Black
        Something I don’t see among real candidates to take the post of president of the United States of people who are capable of constructive and equal dialogue with Russia.

        What about trump?
    2. field engineer
      field engineer 19 February 2016 10: 24
      +1
      And where does the US presidents?
    3. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 19 February 2016 10: 40
      +3
      Quote: RUSS
      "Obama is a goof, but it contains a hint-good fellows lesson “I hope the subsequent US presidents will not repeat the mistakes of this lop-eared president.

      Yes, what is there to repeat? They, his mistakes, will have to fix another ten years)))
  6. MuadDib
    MuadDib 19 February 2016 10: 07
    0
    It seems to me that they calculated the feasibility of the event and came to the conclusion that there would be no dividends. Or, option number two, left Libya for the next president. To gain points from the electorate.
  7. zyablik.olga
    zyablik.olga 19 February 2016 10: 09
    +2

    The main goal for the air strikes was to become the Libyan Sirte - the birthplace of the former leader of the country, Muammar Gaddafi. Currently, the city is hosted by bandits.

    Sirt is one of the main Libyan ports from where the oil is shipped. Of course, it would be strange if the Americans began to bomb it. This is business, and nothing personal ...
  8. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 19 February 2016 10: 09
    0
    As always they want to do everything with the wrong hands.
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 February 2016 10: 11
    +4
    Earlier, bellicose statements about readiness for intervention in Libya were made французский and italian leaders

    France was the main mass-entertainer unleashing the conflict in Libya. And now it blows warlike bubbles, but so far no sense is visible. Breaking does not build.
  10. Trailer
    Trailer 19 February 2016 10: 11
    +2
    And what to bomb in Sirte? So he was bombed in 2011 under zero?
  11. triglav
    triglav 19 February 2016 10: 28
    +1
    Did the lop-eared step back? That's right, otherwise they will not let him spend his time.
  12. V.ic
    V.ic 19 February 2016 10: 30
    +1
    “Barack Obama would like to see precisely this country at the head of this military campaign,”

    Who doubted that the USA would not expose its intimate place, the opposite of the mouth of the speakers.
  13. Lanista
    Lanista 19 February 2016 11: 10
    +1
    Fools, as Otto von Bismarck said, learn from their mistakes.
  14. Papapg
    Papapg 19 February 2016 11: 12
    +1
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    Quote: RUSS
    "Obama is a sucker, but there is a hint to good fellows in him." I hope subsequent US presidents will not repeat the mistakes of this lop-eared president.
    Yes, what is there to repeat? They, his mistakes, will have to fix another ten years)))

    At Abamka, my mother was sick with the zika virus, you can not say otherwise. Obvious things, events are sometimes issued from such a perspective that there are no other excuses besides Zeke.
  15. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 19 February 2016 11: 25
    0
    America begins to save on everything in a row, the steepness is over! Now it’s time for them to think not to play in the box, and not to engage in world leadership.
  16. Berber
    Berber 19 February 2016 12: 11
    +1
    Libya, in the end, will still be our problem. Everything that mattresses muddied, they muddled primarily against us. Sooner or later we will have to intervene. This should be included in geostrategic plans, since we are not a regional power, but a global one. This raises two questions.
    1. How to do this with the least loss?
    2. Who to rely on?
  17. afrikanez
    afrikanez 19 February 2016 15: 15
    +1
    To hide behind the backs of the French and Italians - they are always there, with a great deal !!! They brought up the country and now they don’t need it. But what about American world order? angry