Taking into account such prospects, the unrest and scandals in the Rada speak about strengthening the position of the Bandera radicals who are in favor of the demolition of the “occupation regime” of Poroshenko-Yatsenyuk. After Yatsenyuk kept himself in the prime minister’s seat with Poroshenko’s presidential assistance, they will curse together.
Poroshenko made a big mistake, leaving Yatsenyuk, hated by the “revolutionary masses”, in the prime minister’s office, but at the same time calling for a “complete reboot of the government”. And who strongly advised this to him? Such half-heartedness is unacceptable, especially in the conditions of an acute political crisis. After all, Yatsenyuk will turn into a convenient base for attacking Poroshenko. Especially since he fired his stubborn tin soldier, Prosecutor General Shokin, to resign. In aggregate, this foreshadows Poroshenko’s quick political catastrophe.
Another important consequence of the parliamentary storm was the transition to the open and even radical opposition of former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko with his Batkivshchyna party: “The party and faction consider it unacceptable to be in this pack, which has no chance to reform and reboot our whole life” .
The “opposition bloc”, on the contrary, is becoming pro-presidential, it seems he was the one who saved Yatsenyuk from retirement, leaving the polling station in time. Poroshenko forms on the basis of the oppo-bloc in parliament, as it were, of the new “regionals”, forgetting that these same people recently betrayed ex-President Yanukovych. This is what gave Saakashvili a reason to talk about the "oligarchic coup" in the Rada.
Tymoshenko’s transition into opposition was preceded by the formalization of the political tandem of Tymoshenko-Nalyvaychenko, which received a high blessing on the eve of Washington itself. Perhaps this is a blessing at weaning of power in a relatively honest way with Poroshenko, by some clever combination in the style of Ostap Bender.
Nalyvaychenko, after all, when he was head of the Security Service of Ukraine, he collected a whole suitcase of compromising evidence at all, and he honestly warned everyone about it. Obviously, Yulia and “Batkivshchyna” will provide this project with a political roof, and Nalyvaychenko - a power one, since he is the curator of DUK Dmitro Yarosh.
The situation is interesting: all Poroshenko's henchmen and henchmen are under battle, they are accused of corruption and other terrible sins. And not only the opposition accuses, but also Western experts like ex-minister Aivaras Abromavicius. The latter was supported by the entire diplomatic western army in Kiev ...
All the preparatory steps have been taken, it remains to blame for the corruption of the president Poroshenko. Who will strike this brunt? Abromavicius? It may well be that he hinted at his press conference that some decisive events would occur before the end of February ...
The blockade of Russian truckers has shown that the real power on the ground, especially in the western regions of Banderia, no longer belongs entirely to Kiev. She also showed the possibilities of “social activists”, their high organization and discipline.
During the alleged spontaneous blockade, there were no serious excesses with drivers, not a single truck was looted! These public figures clearly with military discipline, they carried out the order and were warned about the responsibility for its violation. These are all very bad signals for the Kiev regime of "internal occupation", do not forget this definition of Poroshenko's true Bandera.
In general, President Poroshenko is rapidly turning into Yanukovych, and the political situation in the country will be premathanded, only “peaceful protesters” will be with weapons... The political barometer in the Verkhovna Rada also clearly shows the storm: Tymoshenko not only untied the spit, but also entered into strange relations with Nalyvaychenko, the former head of the Security Service of Ukraine and the CIA agent, and does not hide it.
The last counterplay for Poroshenko is the urgent resumption of the war in the Donbas, to send everyone to a new war. However, this is too obvious a move, and besides, it is unlikely that it will be possible to raise troops on the offensive in rainy February-March, and the militia will help with this. The last bastion of Peter in Kiev is the SBU with Gritsak. However, it is not known how resistant it is to the pressure of ambassador Jeffrey Payette?
Poroshenko’s half-hearted decisions in the style of Yanukovych led him to become an ideal candidate for the role of a scapegoat or moor. Moor Poroshenko did his job, the Moor has to go ... And it will be much better for the Moor, otherwise, because his "leave". On good, Poroshenko is time to prepare a spare airfield, it is not too late, though, it is not clear where? Who can give him shelter? It seems that the only option is to run to the Lukashenko’s man, to support the Minsk process ...
What does all this mean in a Hamburg account? By demolishing the corrupt “Poroshenko regime”, Washington shuts down the Ukraine project and throws its remnants to European hyenas. Follow the actions of Poland: Churchill called it the very hyena of Europe.